Congrats! I wish you to get more and more subscribers! I try to report about you to people. I don't have friends, that's why I can't ask nobody to join you. All the best to you!
@manavkhatarkar9983
Жыл бұрын
Happy New Year Mark! Congrats on hitting 8k subs. Btw do you have any plans about starting a podcast where you call philosophers, logicians and discuss various philosophical topics particularly one's pertaining to logic and epistemology??
@marioksoresalhillick299
Жыл бұрын
awesome idea
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Thanks! I thought about a podcast, not sure I can fit an extra thing into my life! But I do like the idea of interviews, I’m hoping to do some on KZitem this year.
@dominiks5068
Жыл бұрын
Happy new year to one of the best philosophy channels on KZitem! Stuff I'd love for you to cover: philosophy of time (presentism vs eternalism, A-theory vs B-theory), are there abstract objects and is classical logic the one true logic
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Happy new year to you too! Great list of topics - lots of metaphysics!
@marioksoresalhillick299
Жыл бұрын
Max Stirner. jk You probably do not know that much about him. But if you do, it'd be cool to see one! 😸Have not watched any of your videos in a while actually, but this reminded me of your channel so am planning to do a deep dive. Thanks for all your work, and well done at reaching 8k subs!
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Is he the anarchist? Not sure I’d do the ideas justice. Thanks for the support this year!
@marioksoresalhillick299
Жыл бұрын
@@AtticPhilosophy This is from a while ago, but in a way yes - many of anarchist (including myself) see him as essentially an anarchist. Others of different politics interpret him in different ways acc to their own political ideologies. Apologies for the late response, have been very busy and wasn't looking at comments.
@MatthewMartinDean
Жыл бұрын
re: topics I'd like to see The pluriverse & possible universes, both Kripke-style and Lewis-style. If there was ever a topic made for recreational youtube philosophy it was the pluriverse.
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
haha ok, good suggestion!
@traceurGeorge
Жыл бұрын
Congrats on the 8,000 subs, (its actually gone up a little bit since you published this vid) if only channels like yours had the millions of subscribers that other KZitemrs have, the world would be a lot more interesting place! The stuff on Wittgenstein sounds great! I would love something - maybe a multiple part series would work good, on technology and/or the philosophy of technology, starting with the Ancient Greeks, then too Heidegger and then maybe some reflections or analysis of the modern day technologies we all use and how they fit in? It seems we live in a pretty technology mad world, yet KZitem and the podcast world seem a little devoid of examination of the philosophical kind of social media and smart phones etc!
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Wittgenstein coming soon (ish)
@milenahoffman1870
Жыл бұрын
Happy New Year sir. Your video's usually trigger more questions than answers. If you have time for requests: What would be your personal view on the modal ontological argument (it is possible that god exists, , therefore it is necessary that god exists).
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
I think it's a valid argument with a false premise. God (on at least some conceptions) exists necessarily if at all, so if he possibly exists, he exists, so exists necessarily. That reasoning uses the B axiom of modal logic, which is hard to deny. But I think he premise is false: God isn't possible in the right sense to make the argument work: he isn't *metaphysically* possible. He may be imaginable, conceivable, or possible for all we know (although I personally reject the last: I think we can know he doesn't exist). But imaginability or conceivability do not imply possibility. Plenty of conceivable things aren't really possible.
@animore8626
Жыл бұрын
Hi Professor Mark, happy new year! I've got a few questions I guess that have been popping into my mind recently that I'd love to hear your responses to. I'm not sure if you've done a video or answered a comment on this before, but I'd love to hear your take on the moral realism/anti-realism debate. What camp do you tend to fall into? And a bit of a more technical question involving logic, I'm a bit stuck on the difference between a model and an interpretation. As far as I'm aware, an interpretation in e.g. first-order logic is something that supplies us with a domain of discourse, the extensions of all our predicates, and the referents to all of our constants. But how would that differ from a model? Is a model just an interpretation that makes certain formulas true? Thanks so much, and a very happy new year to you!
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Moral realism for me. Interpretations and models are basically the same: “interpretation” refers specifically to a first-order language, “models” also applies to modal & other logics.
@rastgo4432
Жыл бұрын
Great channel, thanks for your efforts, It'll be awesome of made videos on different philosophical schools from ancient Greece to modern day philosophy, also on different philosophers, their common ideas and differences.
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Good suggestion! History of philosophy isn’t my strong suit, so I’ll probably be selective in what I cover.
@johnmckenna801
Жыл бұрын
Wittgenstein and more Logic; I'm in!
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Great!
@anteodedi8937
Жыл бұрын
Regarding atheism, I would like to see an assessment of the diversity of atheistic views of reality. Many people think atheism is confined to materialism/physicalism, but that's a blatant error by my lights. Examples would be atheists/naturalists like David Chalmers, Thomas Nagel, Galen Strawson.
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Atheism can go with any view of reality, so long as it doesn’t have god or gods in it. In that sense, atheism is quite a minimal and specific thesis, not really a worldview at all. It’s a big deal in religious societies, but not metaphysically a big deal.
@frankavocado
Жыл бұрын
Happy New Year, and cheers for all the thought provoking work. I reckon that Wittgenstein is pretty much always a work in progress.
@AtticPhilosophy
Жыл бұрын
Thanks! And to you too.
@tomholroyd7519
Жыл бұрын
If you read almost *anything* about philosophy or logic on the web, there is an implicit bias towards binary logic. That sucks
@tomholroyd7519
Жыл бұрын
Binary logic is broken, riddled with paradox, and you can solve all of it with only 3 truth values
@tomholroyd7519
Жыл бұрын
We need to get rid of the implicit bias in philosophy that there are only two choices
@milenahoffman1870
Жыл бұрын
@@tomholroyd7519 How about "we need to get rid of the implicit bias that there are ALWAYS only two options"?
Пікірлер: 30