I'm glad they were able to represent all four colors of magic in this game.
@matthugenberg8869
4 жыл бұрын
Justin is right. Commander is a quality on the card that cannot be taken away. It is not an ability and not text on the card. If it did, it would not be able to go into your command zone because it wouldn't be your commander anymore.
@oliver5732
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah and that can lead to some weird things, like if you manifest your Commander, it still deals Commander Damage
@joshuasnyder4101
4 жыл бұрын
Technically in oathbreaker you have to control the plameswalker that is your commander. If it loses that typing then you cant
@papernes
4 жыл бұрын
joshua snyder The rule says you just have to control your Oathbreaker. Jace, Wielder of Mysteries in in play, under Jon’s control. Regardless if it’s a land. Your Oathbreaker follows the same rules as commander, except you choose a Planeswalker rather than a legendary creature.
@buggy65x
4 жыл бұрын
If you Imprison in the Moon my commander, and I animate the land with an awaken spell and it hits you, that will count as commander damage. The "physical card" is your commander. It's the same reason why token copies of your commander don't deal commander damage.
@TyranitarStudios
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Justin!, your constant effort on the thumbnails should be an example to the other 3, however at this point I have lost all faith in them )': Maybe asking for shirtless Steven is to much...
@whirlwindsky
4 жыл бұрын
I think Jon has once MAYBE twice, but ya big credit to Justin for having fun with the thumbnail pictures.
@tomcadden8054
4 жыл бұрын
Did Jeremy saying "Let me win so I can continue to get lucky every night" just go over the heads of the other guys?
@ec-pc3122
4 жыл бұрын
They didn't get it because theyre still virgins lol
@kingfuzzy2
3 жыл бұрын
You do know Jon just had a baby right?
@tomcadden8054
3 жыл бұрын
@@kingfuzzy2 I wrote that over a year ago!
@kingfuzzy2
3 жыл бұрын
im okay with that ( :
@Kazz1187
4 жыл бұрын
Bless Stephen green, taking all the beatings and drawing all the hate
@AhmedM1247
4 жыл бұрын
Justin: "We can all rub our beards together" Everyone: rubs their beards. Me: rubs my beard with them.
@dino-wer-kuh3498
4 жыл бұрын
saffron olive: gets lost in his beard
@AhmedM1247
4 жыл бұрын
@@dino-wer-kuh3498 🤣🤣🤣 that beard is majestic
@badenglish_84
4 жыл бұрын
Ahmed Mohammed , anyone else get a vision of them standing in a corner rubbing their faces on each other..........
@Preachamain
4 жыл бұрын
Okay, I've been actually super into oathbreaker for the last 6 months and my absolute favorite walker-spell combo I've found is: Saheeli, Sublime Artificer and Start Your Engines. (and then almost every vehicle in magic)
@nomoreowo5808
2 жыл бұрын
I like tibalt and jeskas will
@sakuranegi577
4 жыл бұрын
If the enchanted permanent is a land and has land types, it retains those types even though it loses any intrinsic mana abilities associated with them. Imprison is different from alpine moon. alpine moon removes the land type
@papernes
4 жыл бұрын
Ruochong Song Imprisoned in the Moon says it loses all other card types. Tron would be shut off, cause the tron lands care about card type not card name.
@sakuranegi577
4 жыл бұрын
@@papernes imprison in the moon doesnt say that. My first paragraph was copied from card ruling
@collins957
4 жыл бұрын
@@papernes the tron lands care about the name, all three lands don't have any extra card "type" their type is simply "land"
@SoggyWaffles.
4 жыл бұрын
@@collins957Don't each of the tron lands have "Urza's" and whatever specific name they have as their land type? mtg.gamepedia.com/Urza%27s#Mine
@kennystorgel686
4 жыл бұрын
@Mason Collins tron lands cared about names in the older rulings, but newer rulings say that Mine, Power-Plant and Tower are the nonbasic land types of those lands. However as @Ruochong Song mentioned, if the enchanted permanent is a land and has land types, it retains those types. Imprisoned in the moon only removes all card types other than Land type.. those types are Creature, Enchantment, Artifact, Instanst, Sorcery and such..of course it works only on permanents but yeah..so tron is still online
@seanclark4071
4 жыл бұрын
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, I enjoy Justin imitating his commander
@jonathanalbee8127
4 жыл бұрын
From a magic judge blog regarding various effects from eldritch moon: Although the enchanted permanent loses all other card types, Imprisoned in the Moon doesn’t make it lose any subtypes, such as “Urza’s” or “Tower” [CR 205.3i]. Therefore, when Nicole’s other two lands look, they will still see that she controls an Urza’s Tower, so they will produce 2 each. The Tower loses its Urza land ability and has only the ability granted by Imprisoned in the Moon, so it only taps for 1.
@scottmUTCS
4 жыл бұрын
Lesson learned: ALWAYS kill Jon if you have the chance. ALWAYS.
@HalberdierHyperion
3 жыл бұрын
This continues to be true and they still haven't learned.
@arbhall7572
Жыл бұрын
@@HalberdierHyperion We got a guy like this in my pod. Hes easily the best player with an excellent collection. We spend the entire drive home saying "we got to gang up on him and press him." But every week. An opportunist provokes all out war and "that guy" owns the table every week. . Ill stop doing it when it stops being funny.
@vader1137
4 жыл бұрын
Imprisoned in the Moon is an enchantment that says: "Enchanted Permanent becomes a colorless LAND with 'add {c} to your mana pool' and loses all other card types and abilities" That been said, the permanent been enchanted, in this case Jace, Wielder of Mysteries would stop been a Planeswalker with loyalty abilities, and become a colorless LAND with this ability named "Jace, Wielder of Mysteries" Jon still had control of his commander, and therefore in the minute 48:35 of the discussion, he could actually cast Paradigm Shift if he wanted to, becuase regardless of the actual status of Jace as not been a planeswalker, it is still under the owner's control.
@saraceenpsycho2859
4 жыл бұрын
Please please please give us some more oathbreaker content. This game was great! :D I would love to see more of it.
@mikelteson1342
4 жыл бұрын
Kinda excited for some oathbreaker content
@FlexFrosty
4 жыл бұрын
The 20/20 token should be bearded Jeremy.
@GregDorn
4 жыл бұрын
1:05:09 I believe under rule 800.4a that when Stephen left the game, the effect of Oko's ability which says "exchange control", would end. This returns the Prophet to Jeremy. The food token was owned by Stephen and so it is exiled when he leaves the game. I might be mistaken, but every reference I checked seems to state that Prophet would stay in the game and return to it's owner's control. If not, I would like to know the rule that counters this.
@GunbladeKnight
4 жыл бұрын
Not owner's specifically, but the previous controller unless that controller has also left the game.
@GregDorn
4 жыл бұрын
Yes, previous controller. So when Jeremy made a big deal that he should get it, and made his attack with that intent, and then lost because he didn't get it back, it was a pivotal mistake
@GunbladeKnight
4 жыл бұрын
@@GregDorn "Owner" is a specific game term meaning either "Person who started with the card in their deck" or "Person under whose control the token was created."
@GregDorn
4 жыл бұрын
@@GunbladeKnight Terms are important and I was lazy and used "owner" instead of controller. I corrected my post, but I appreciate pointing that out so others aren't confused by my post.
@razielthedamn4301
4 жыл бұрын
Yes, all permanents of Steven are exiled (including elk-food that he owned cause he created it), then control effects end and if there is a previous controller of them, they go back. If not, go to exile.
@ameliaburton5313
4 жыл бұрын
Jon and I share very similar Oathbreaker decks. Mine is Jace, Wielder of Mysteries, Treasure Hunt and 58 mismatched islands. Very similar sentiments
@tajicbladeofthelegion5474
4 жыл бұрын
Guaranteed turn 5 win if opponents can't get in the way?
@Fyrwulf
4 жыл бұрын
It's really not, though. Yours is a glass cannon combo deck and his is a control deck with a combo finisher.
@nicholasfarrell5981
4 жыл бұрын
Alex Larsen I'm working on a version that uses cards like Dreamborn Muse and Psychic Corrosion, so I can mill my opponents out from time to time.
@TheCoyote808
4 жыл бұрын
Commander is an attribute of the card. So if casting requires control of his commander, even if it was an Elk token, he still controls his commander. Commander damage from manifested commanders is handled the same way. So unless Oathbreaker has different rules for commanders, then Jon can cast his signature spell while Jace is a Land because he controls his commander even if it is a land.
@AufziehMeister1
4 жыл бұрын
Ok there's a random god in this selection. Me: it Fiblphip, isn't it. Kyle: Of course it is.
@Reaperherpderp
4 жыл бұрын
Jeremy is such a mouse and swayed to easily.
@YaoBao1
4 жыл бұрын
Preach. Either that or his threat assessment game needs some SERIOUS tutelage, cause ignoring the player with a lab man effect, less than five cards in his library and a very manageable life total for a green deck seems like VERY poor threat assessment in my book.
@Milika666
4 жыл бұрын
Waiting for the Steven Green come from behind sweep. Edit: I am disappointed....
@soron703
4 жыл бұрын
Sole possession of last gets killed first again. I wanna see those negative pts. RIP Green
@Kazz1187
4 жыл бұрын
#teamgreen
@askloglog
4 жыл бұрын
Jeremey for being such a smart guy you make a lot of decisions that hurt my head...
@DrArmadilloPhd
4 жыл бұрын
If the enchanted permanent is a land and has land types, it retains those types even though it loses any intrinsic mana abilities associated with them. For example, a Plains enchanted by Imprisoned in the Moon is still a Plains, but it can’t tap for , only for .
@NotoriouslyADD
4 жыл бұрын
Format looked fun. Not sure if this is the best place to put this, but a future spin on the Commander format: Alternate version partners. Example: Neheb the Worthy and Neheb Eternal as partner commanders.
@tcarlos210
4 жыл бұрын
Imprison in the moon does cancel the ability for the land to tap for two but it keeps it's name, the other two lands look for that name and they would see it so they would still tap for two. Alpine moon works against the tron lands because it hits all three. Edit: So Imprisoned in the Moon wouldn't be that great in this situation.
@jb87rell
4 жыл бұрын
You're conclusion is correct but not the reasons. The urza lands don't care about the name they care about the sub type. Imprison doesn't change the subtype but Alpine does.
@tcarlos210
4 жыл бұрын
@@jb87rell Sorry, yes, you are correct. I misread the wording on the cards when making this comment.
@Pavipants
4 жыл бұрын
#KEEPTHEBEARDALIVE Jeremy do it for ms noell
@austinblankenship7631
4 жыл бұрын
Jeremy's list is near exact to the one I've ran forever, except i run snow lands/into the north as other ways to get depths. Much better in on one than in a pod ;)
@LordWerwath
4 жыл бұрын
Oko's effect would return prophet back to jeremy when stephen dies. Jace becomes a planeswalker again. Efectively oko ultimate is the same ruling as agent of trechery.
@Aang139
4 жыл бұрын
It has the same ruling as any take control effect, the only time the card would just get exiled is if the owner of the card had never controlled it to begin with. AKA if you cast the card like through thief of sanity
@RyuPlaneswalker
4 жыл бұрын
This was covered extensively in the twitch chat, The Card gets removed from the game. Per Oko's Gatherer. The effects of Oko’s second and third abilities last indefinitely. They don’t expire during the cleanup step or if you or Oko leave the game. Oko’s third ability doesn’t expire if the creature you take has its power raised above 3 later. The Agent of Treachery ruling is dumb and the judge who did it should be demoted because that ruing goes against every other ruling in similar effects. (The Aura Enchantments are the exception to this rule because They do transfer control back when they leave play)
@Aang139
4 жыл бұрын
@@RyuPlaneswalker It's not dumb, it's how every other control effect works? Oko shouldn't work any differently
@RyuPlaneswalker
4 жыл бұрын
@@Aang139 Every other control works like the Oko Ruling I linked except ones that require a permanent to be active, such as Control Magic or Dragon Lord Slimugar. The Agent of Treachery Ruling is flat out wrong.
@vipper57779
4 жыл бұрын
@@RyuPlaneswalker well damn. I mean I won't argue with gatherer but in that case OKO has the dumb ruling because all other control effects revert back. Damn you Oko for still making our lives difficult lol
@2236UmbrellaCorp
4 жыл бұрын
You guys are great. Thank you.
@The_Breaded92
4 жыл бұрын
Man I love these guys but sometimes the salt is too much to handle. 😂
@neorazor1403
4 жыл бұрын
The salt in this episode is MUCH less than it normally is.
@ttuts9082
4 жыл бұрын
@@neorazor1403 compared to the past, this season has been VERY salty and very anti-Stephen
@Joshbobjovi
4 жыл бұрын
@@ttuts9082 wait. I thought the theme of Commander VS was Salt and Stephen hate
@tsho6131
4 жыл бұрын
Stephen Green: World’s Greatest Impressionist.
@RazorbladeDog
4 жыл бұрын
"Now Jeremy, he dazed my negate and I said ok." is the kind of Justin banter I love
@DanRobotMan
4 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure Jeremy should have gotten Prophet back when Stephen died, as it was a control spell/ability. If I am wrong, would some one be able to explain why?
@vipper57779
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah I'm pretty sure Justin had that totally wrong. Jeremy should've lost the elk and gotten back prophet since the elk was created by Stephen and leaves with him and because prophet was control magiced. Only way the creature wouldn't have gone back is if it had never existed under Jeremy (i.e. bribery or reanimation)
@hstuken
4 жыл бұрын
He doesn’t - it goes into exile/outside the game because there isn’t a continuous effect keeping Prophet on Stephen’s side so when he exists the game all permanents he controls are removed from the game, including Prophet.
@Illuxx777
4 жыл бұрын
@@hstuken That's not how it works. If a permanent was ever under the control of its owner, but changes control for any reason, it would return once the thieving player died.
@erfunk
4 жыл бұрын
@@hstuken The permanents a player _owns_ are removed from the game, along with any _effects_ they own. This includes the control change, so Prophet is still in play and slides back to Jeremy. It's different if it entered play under the dying player's control, and would be exiled with them as there is a second pass to clean up anything still under their control once their stuff disappears.
@hstuken
4 жыл бұрын
Eric Funk That’s not how rule 800.4 works in this instance. There are no effects giving him control of Prophet (e.g. Act of Treason) he merely has control therefore when he dies, all his permanents leave and if there’s anything left under his control after that, which Prophet would, those are exiled too.
@ericmartin6388
4 жыл бұрын
Yay! Oathbreaker representation! I love Oathbreaker!
@nicholasfarrell5981
4 жыл бұрын
Eric Martin same here. I wish it got shown on KZitem more often.
@neorazor1403
4 жыл бұрын
Glad to see these guys actually having fun and not being salt mountains
@joshuasnyder4101
4 жыл бұрын
Stephen green build mono blue devotion aggro with fphtlpb. It’ll be funny when you defeat all these gods
@henryjones8636
4 жыл бұрын
Any way to see Jeremy's post-Theros Villainous Wealth Commander list?
@nicholaswawruck7223
4 жыл бұрын
Okay what did I miss? Hour of Devastation was countered. Should have Kozilek maintained it's indestructible?
@joesamsally
4 жыл бұрын
@Director Kyle. The score splash screen not having a beard on Jeremy seems like an error. Can this be fixed?
@nickgalletti632
4 жыл бұрын
I'm confused or lost but at 21:25 Justin destroys one of two food tokens. Stephen doesn't remove it but later uses one for life gain and turn the other one into a elk and and then eventually takes Jeremy's Prophet. Witch changes the outcome of the game. I understand the issues of ruling on cards and abilities but when something is destroyed it should leave the battlefield. Or did i miss something.
@antonlukkarinen2648
4 жыл бұрын
What are you talking about? He destroyed Lotus Petal
@nickgalletti632
4 жыл бұрын
I though he told Stephen to destroy the food token not the Johnathan's lotus petal. Thank you for clarifying
@nicholasfarrell5981
4 жыл бұрын
Awesome, Oathbreaker!
@reighbenearlwystenm.labill536
4 жыл бұрын
Jeremy Noel looking like a zaaaaaddy!! 💜💜💜
@MrRenaz
4 жыл бұрын
same here/ no notification !
@inearthed454
4 жыл бұрын
game start 13:20
@fenixmeaney6170
4 жыл бұрын
Jeremy would have kept the prophet It didn't etb on Stephen so it defaults to previous controller
@tray9012
4 жыл бұрын
Excuse me but could you guys do a commander planechase?
@nicholasfarrell5981
4 жыл бұрын
tray9012 I'd like to see Oathbreaker Planechase.
@ay0and0jay
4 жыл бұрын
“That’s a real card” - Jeremy Noell. Should be on a shirt
@matthugenberg8869
4 жыл бұрын
Jeremy gets back profit. If something is stolen and a player controlling it dies, it gets goes back to the player if the card was stolen from the battlefield. It gets exiled if it is put into play from the graveyard, exile, or library.
@lordsoth1267
4 жыл бұрын
The effects of Oko’s second and third abilities last indefinitely. They don’t expire during the cleanup step or if you or Oko leave the game. Oko’s third ability doesn’t expire if the creature you take has its power raised above 3 later. direct quote from gatherer... the effect of oko breaks the ruling (like a lot of cards in magic) even if YOU or oko leave the game you still will control it. and all permanents and spell effects you have on the stack are exiled at death.
@Bladerxdxi
4 жыл бұрын
Ist Marit Lage token indestructable?
@badenglish_84
4 жыл бұрын
Wow, we are actually playing relatively competitive powerful cards on VS this time around.
@DatainBS
4 жыл бұрын
It would be easier to binge watch if there was a playlist for the commander vs. shows on the channel
@SCGCommander
4 жыл бұрын
There are playlists located on our KZitem page which can be found here: kzitem.info
@cbwsoe
4 жыл бұрын
I was really hoping the 8th god was going to be Elspeth. Would have been such a story win.
@abehasinski2622
4 жыл бұрын
54:50 why didn't jeromy tap out to remove as many counters from dark depths on justin's end step. then untap again on jon's untap step with prophet of kruphix?
@flonaise
4 жыл бұрын
I run Simic Nissa with her Triump, and being able to get the Urza lands is just ridiculous.
@CoreyHowardPowerHour
8 ай бұрын
Team Suarez needs t-shirts that say "Hold on I didn't say it resolves. Nah you can have it I don't care"
@henryolavisaarijarvi6594
4 жыл бұрын
Stephen needs to build the Fblthp combo deck with proteus staff.
@francescogulisano2917
4 жыл бұрын
Crim needs to go to Jon for some lessons about diverting people's attention from them in a game of commander
@shrek2ondvd985
4 жыл бұрын
Crim would still be killed first
@francescogulisano2917
4 жыл бұрын
@@shrek2ondvd985 well, he didn't die first on Game Knights, so... He's improving, maybe
@MongooseTrianglez
4 жыл бұрын
@@francescogulisano2917 That's because he wasn't a threat!
@francescogulisano2917
4 жыл бұрын
@@MongooseTrianglez well, even on most commander clash episodes he's not a threat
@vipper57779
4 жыл бұрын
When did they get rid of the "killing last place first loses you a point" rule? Kinda getting dull watching last place lose over and over. Not just because I'm team Green but because its now effectively a 3 man competition now.
@theRealTyanStrategy
4 жыл бұрын
Wow of course John wins. Why dont they ever take him out?
@christophervelasquez2063
4 жыл бұрын
That's my boy John!! Get that win! Climb that points ladder!
@Tastedterror
4 жыл бұрын
Meh... too much salt for my taste. Literally this season has been nothing but salt, I think you guys need a break cause I feel a lot of hostility between each other
@Goscalyon
4 жыл бұрын
How is Jeremy fetching everything but basic Forest lands with Nissa's Triumph? 51:50
@whirlwindsky
4 жыл бұрын
The spell says if he has Nissa out to search for 3 Lands. Since it doesnt specifically say forrest for the "Nissa is out" half he can search for any 3 lands.
@Goscalyon
4 жыл бұрын
@@whirlwindsky Thanks for clarifying, I always read the card as 3 instead of 2 because I have gotten so many of those cards. So I have put the triumphs away when building my planeswalker deck, but now I might just add it to my decks :)
@whirlwindsky
4 жыл бұрын
@@Goscalyon I understand 100% Whenever I read cards that have similar effects to a lot of others (in this case cards like Rampant Growth, Nissa's Pilgrimage, etc.) my brain almost does an "auto pilot" type thing, and it causes me to under or over evaluate cards, until I go to play them or have them played against me and I have to reread them. Lol
@Goscalyon
4 жыл бұрын
@@whirlwindsky The thing is I had the card in my pre-release deck (although without a Nissa planeswalker) XD I guess thats why I ignore the 2e halve :P
@whirlwindsky
4 жыл бұрын
@@Goscalyon oh hahaha fair enough. I've done similar with other cards.
@harshpeter
Жыл бұрын
Yeah sometimes i rewatch episodes because i miss Jeremy. Pretty sad of me :D
@nicholasbarnhill9425
4 жыл бұрын
Imagine literally wanting lab man as your commander
@FreshLeafyVegetables
4 жыл бұрын
I haven't laughed as hard at Commander Vs as when John called Stephen dumb in that high pitch voice. What a meanie face.
@atomikboos1
4 жыл бұрын
How did he not pair Bolas with Elderspell?
@colemansmith6063
4 жыл бұрын
game starts 13:15
@shayneweyker
4 жыл бұрын
from magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/news/comprehensive-rules-changes-2019-09-27 110.2b and 800.4c If I steal your creature then lose the game, you get it back since you're its default controller. If I steal your spell then lose the game before it resolves, you get it back since you're its default controller. But if I steal your spell, and it becomes a permanent, then I lose the game, you didn't used to get it back. That's changed to line up with other effects that change an object's controller, though, if I take something from you that you never controlled (with Bribery, for example), it still gets exiled if I lose the game.
@Illuxx777
4 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure this covers Oko's control effect. 800.4a. When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game, any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end, and all spells and abilities controlled by that player on the stack cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time he or she left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game. Example: Alex casts Control Magic, an Aura that reads, “You control enchanted creature,” on Bianca’s Wall of Wood. If Alex leaves the game, so does Control Magic, and Wall of Wood reverts to Bianca’s control. If, instead, Bianca leaves the game, so does Wall of Wood, and Control Magic is put into Alex’s graveyard. Example: Alex casts Threaten, which reads, in part, “Untap target creature and gain control of it until end of turn,” targeting Bianca’s Wall of Wood. If Alex leaves the game, Threaten’s change-of-control effect ends and Wall of Wood reverts to Bianca’s control.
@lordsoth1267
4 жыл бұрын
The effects of Oko’s second and third abilities last indefinitely. They don’t expire during the cleanup step or if you or Oko leave the game. Oko’s third ability doesn’t expire if the creature you take has its power raised above 3 later. Direct quote from gatherer.... you die its exiled.... oko is broko
@Rocjhead118
4 жыл бұрын
But are you living the life bearded Jeremy would want for you.
@calebjohnson5452
4 жыл бұрын
It's not that you're bad at magic Jeremy, cause you're not! Its just that you normally never do anything exciting. However this week, you did some exciting stuff! Worthy of a bearded player. Keep the beard! Keep the beard! Keep the beard! Keep the beard!
@noahmurtha4036
4 жыл бұрын
Soooo didn’t Jon cast paradigm shift illegally? He didn’t have his commander out
@scifoncra6376
4 жыл бұрын
yes, if the Urza's Mine is imprisoned in the moon, the other 2 Urza lands will still produce extra mana because Urza's Mine is in play. yes, if Jace is imprisoned in the moon, he is still -there- and, in fact, he's still in play and controlled by Jon. Meaning he can still cast his oathspell or wtv the name is. I have to mainly blame twitch chat for being typical twitch chat, but that's not fair for poor o' twitch chat.
@halophilicnc6473
4 жыл бұрын
Re; losing player and control effects. Oko's effect is a control effect so that get's removed when the Oko owner leaves the game. The creature goes back to the previous controller. Effects that put creatures/permanents directly into play from zones that are not the battlefield (Bribery, Rise of the Dark Realms, etc) do not create control effects. Those permanents are exiled when the owner leaves the game. How many groups get this wrong in EDH is frustrating because it's very often relevant. Also, letting Jon win was incredibly Jeremy. From now on "Jeremy" will be my adjective for narrow-sighted bull magic that takes absolutely nothing into account except what just happened to the player.
@unamusedpanda857
4 жыл бұрын
Prophet of Kruphix shouldve returned to Jeremy's control.
@cameronbumgarner121
4 жыл бұрын
No it doesn't
@unamusedpanda857
4 жыл бұрын
800.4a. When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game, any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end, and all spells and abilities controlled by that player on the stack cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled.
@unamusedpanda857
4 жыл бұрын
If itd been taken with bribery itd be exiled. But since it entered under its owner control it should return.
@MultiAsdag
4 жыл бұрын
The only cool thing about oathbreaker is the "commander spell" I don't like having 20 life though it seems red would dominate.
@RedMoonArcade
4 жыл бұрын
Kick a man when he is down.. Fblthp, haha
@shrek2ondvd985
4 жыл бұрын
I was hoping to see justin play something along the lines of Sorin vengeful bloodlord and buried alive.. But i guess nicky b is alright
@legoose4598
4 жыл бұрын
Oko should've only had 10 counters on it when he mad the first food into an Elk. Making it possible for Jeremy to attack and Kill Oko without swinging out and losing anything. Again Green cant seem to read his cards 🤷♂️
@KawRoach3s
4 жыл бұрын
Justin had a better chance to win by killing Jon... The chance of Jeremy playing a hasty creature that dodges removal was low.
@4Refros
4 жыл бұрын
2:25 Justin’s talkin about what we in the business call the mcdarby special
@michaelwoodyard7995
4 жыл бұрын
You didn’t tell me to like, comment, subscribe, or binge. I don’t know what to do with my life now.
@chickenrichard5024
4 жыл бұрын
Hey they played my Jace deck. Woot woot
@Snorlax237
4 жыл бұрын
Didn’t even get the notification
@kenjames91680
4 жыл бұрын
is it me or have they done oath breaker before
@nicholasfarrell5981
4 жыл бұрын
kj no. They did 100-card decks with planeswalkers/signature spells, but I don't think they played actual Oathbreaker before.
@kenjames91680
4 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasfarrell5981 ah ty
@nintendonut999
4 жыл бұрын
1:31:20 - Here we see the continued tragic downfall of Stephen Green
@TheMrBigShot96
4 жыл бұрын
RIP bearded Jeremy
@ecos889
4 жыл бұрын
All saw on the screen was one oko and 3 3/3 elks
@Illuxx777
4 жыл бұрын
Jeremy looks hot with the beard.
@parranjohnson9587
4 жыл бұрын
Lol Kyle's an evil genius!
@Zephyri0n
4 жыл бұрын
Just get Proteus staff for fblthp and you win #TeamGreen @RedNeckWins
@BentTimeAndSpace
4 жыл бұрын
WE NEED MORE OATHBREAKER
@bdawg8877
4 жыл бұрын
Trash format.
@jb87rell
4 жыл бұрын
Why? It's a fine little format but it's been on the decline for awhile plus there's way way way less variety.
@nicholasfarrell5981
4 жыл бұрын
Ben agreed. I think it's fun to watch. Though next time, they should take Jon out first.
@fredthered98
4 жыл бұрын
Yay! It was a homonculus!
@ec-pc3122
4 жыл бұрын
I think it's silly that you all sit in the same seating position every game. Knowing that you're always the turn before or after a certain player every game allows you to build your deck around the other 2 decks. Also imagine Jonathan played counter magic every game, I would HATE to be Stephen, being the turn after the control player untaps is gross
@graveno17
4 жыл бұрын
For the algorithm
@brianmontgomery4649
4 жыл бұрын
Return of Archenemy:Green. Yet again Stephen is targeted by Jeremy due to Jeremy being subservient to Justin and Jon. Grow a pair man.
@Rebornhell
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah whats up with that, we all knew what Jon had in his hand/deck, and Jeremy still chose to swing at Stephen with Ms. Lage. That and the constant kicking the man while he is down got me this ep. #TEAMPARNELL
@7MukuroRealm
4 жыл бұрын
Ah, yes, subservient Jeremy, the one who attacks Justin for 13. You can argue Jon, Justin's not making a compelling case that he's a conspirator.
@18almason
4 жыл бұрын
Poor Steven... I wish he'd actually win some games this season.
Пікірлер: 206