What burning question would you ask Neil, Chuck, and Gary? 🤔
@immunitycorrupts3641
9 ай бұрын
if I only had 1 question to ever ask Neil and Chuck. Do either of you want their to be alien life out there? either answer why or why not?
@julianthegodmusic
9 ай бұрын
There’s a lot of theories as to how the universe came about. But WHY did it come about
@ericreid8111
9 ай бұрын
If you couldnt be a scientist, pro athlete, and comedian, what would you have been?
@ASIRA89
9 ай бұрын
What would happen if, instead of compressing matter until a black hole forms, you'd instead increase "tension?". Would a tiny rip in space form? Would nothing happen? Is it even possible to "decrease gravity" to the same degree as we can increase it? (that's all one question btw lol)
@Highlyskeptical
9 ай бұрын
In addition to Energy, what other books would you recommend to restart civilization?
@Jacob-Simonsen
9 ай бұрын
So blessed to be able to listen to this man, where I want, when I want. With new great episodes almost daily.
@izzanirfan2534
9 ай бұрын
Science made it possible
@phoule76
9 ай бұрын
gesundheit
@calico27
6 ай бұрын
This!!
@NoThankYouToo
4 ай бұрын
He’s a complete fraud.
@KaseeSmith
3 ай бұрын
@@izzanirfan2534no it didn’t. Ideas don’t sprout legs and arms and create things
@pdxmusl1510
9 ай бұрын
I want an episode where neil asks chuck questions! 😀
@joseimpact
9 ай бұрын
in another universe this is already happening 😅
@flashahhasavedeveryoneofus2824
9 ай бұрын
@@snowice8816fr 💯I stopped watching for like a year bc of that
@pdxmusl1510
9 ай бұрын
Idk. I think Chuck understands more than you think. And it would be neil asking. So no black jokes being asked. Black joke responces.. probably. But none asked.
@michaelccopelandsr7120
9 ай бұрын
"If you ate yourself, would you disappear or grow twice as large?" - Pinky
@ryanb6658
9 ай бұрын
Exactly!
@kanishkaveediyabandara3028
9 ай бұрын
Man, this episode is so good! This type of wholesome entertaining can literally lift your spirits up! Please keep doing more episodes like this where Chuck gets to ask his burning quests and lose gaskets.
@jeffffff12
7 ай бұрын
I think that's the best part of the show! And Neil's laugh!
@debramiller3548
8 ай бұрын
For this 70 year old with a bone head 12th grade education? I’m so happy to be listening and some what comprehending what is being “taught” here. This type of education needs to be taught from kindergarten through 12th grade. Change the antiquated teaching mythologies to real education that children learn important lessons ✌🏼💖
@haggleboggle
9 ай бұрын
Please do make this a regular thing. Maybe around the new year? Make Gary and Chuck write down their questions as the year goes along.
@Iammrspickley
9 ай бұрын
Make them default members of the StarTalk episodes. 🥳
@erkinalp
9 ай бұрын
No no around April 1.
@abstract5249
9 ай бұрын
Once a year is too infrequent. Maybe a monthly thing? Biweekly? Something like that.
@ligh7foo7
9 ай бұрын
First week of the new season. Approx 4 times a year
@zemopr7024
9 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😅😅😅
@eric.varillasfemss5708
9 ай бұрын
This was one of the BEST episodes I’ve ever heard! I think it’s because Chuck and Gary both hear so many great questions all the time, they are able to distill their own questions down to their essence and really get Neil thinking and explaining things explicitly. I also love their genuine fascination and reactions to Neil’s answers! I love watching Chuck lose his mind and how incredible the universe is! Priceless!!! Keep up this awesome work guys! I would LOVE to have this format be a semi-regular thing!
@peglegjim57
9 ай бұрын
Nowhere else, and with no other individuals, are these subjects covered in a way that inspires side-splitting laughter. Thank you, Gentlemen. 🙏
@RandomMusingsOfLowMelanin
4 ай бұрын
Every official video with Dr.Tyson and Chuck Nice, its actual digital gold!
@a.N.....
2 ай бұрын
What is that name dude 😂
@RandomMusingsOfLowMelanin
2 ай бұрын
@@a.N..... hehe, it humbles me that you noticed it Vitiligo: Vitiligo is a skin “condition” where our own immune cells start killing melanocytes (things responsible to make melanin) Melanin is the compound that gives skin its color. So people living near and near to equator have more and more melanin and therefore they get more and more deep colored (ofc this is evolutionary advantage, This is also because sunlight triggers melanin growth) People with vitiligo (~1% of people) have spots on their skin that are white because there is no melanin in those spots because our immune system killed the melanocytes Manush : That just means human in bangla language(bangla language spoken in west bengal, India, Bangladesh and many more places) Also this immune system thing is in my case, there might be other reasons why melanocytes can die
@vtksolid9127
2 ай бұрын
Bro I love chuck he makes it like it’s me there in The conversation … one of the best podcasts going around on all platforms ❤
@Faisals_Adventures
9 ай бұрын
I am so glad to see this channel grow and have 2.7 million subscribers. Chuck’s interactions have really leveled up. He used to be as lost as I was. In my eyes, this channel is a big dea already, but I hope he gets hosting gigs for all science related shows in Netflix and all TV networks.
@mollycinelle6046
9 ай бұрын
💯 % right, he really does get good at it
@sharayalynice
9 ай бұрын
same!
@BeamMonsterZeus
9 ай бұрын
This is a strong episode. Much more grounded and approachable than some others I must say
@tannhauser5399
5 ай бұрын
I think because some of those questions have been asked for a... long time in a way. And have been out there, as human mind has been pondering those kind of questions for a while. 1. Like double slit experiment. Recently I also watched Tom Campbell and his youtube video: "Anu Physics Experiment and the Implications for Everyone". Maybe slightly wrong example, as that has a different spin and conclusions, but a lot of people has been wondering about it for a long time. 2. Communication in space. Interesting question reagarding communication in deep space, and traveling. A while back Brian Aldiss wrote a book, about generation ship, called "Non Stop". Interesting concept there, and what may happened after several generations, when the ship is traveling in space for a long time, and where there is no communication with Earth. All in all, a good episode, no question about it.
@sharayalynice
9 ай бұрын
my fav combo Neil & Chuck .. and I lovee when they add Gary 🙌🏾 sooo funny so informative I love it!
@waliky2002
8 ай бұрын
I don’t know but we are blessed to have Neil talking about these amazing mind blowing ideas.
@Joekary5
8 ай бұрын
Let's please have an episode of cosmic queries with Chuck answering questions to the best of his knowledge.. With the support of Neil of course
@ceaarmarmolejo-zw2kb
9 ай бұрын
This was an awesome episode. Everyone needs to see this. The video felt like a minute long. it was that damn good. Many thumbs up guys. I love the content!
@dsj82
9 ай бұрын
I love how Neil answers . The way he explain things from the bottom and eventually at some point comes to the actual question.
@bjs001001
9 ай бұрын
I can't believe that's DJ Chuck Nice from back in the day. Right on, brother. So cool to see him in this discussion.
@rjrnj1
9 ай бұрын
You are one of only a few I could listen to for an inordinate time regardless of whether I understand what you're saying or not. 🥰
@tlhome7565
3 ай бұрын
My kids and I love these vids. It inspires them to look deeper. Thank you soo much for these memories with them.
@KeldonA
9 ай бұрын
Chuck is the most enthusiastic physic student on the planet right now
@EmpyreanLightASMR
9 ай бұрын
I won't deny that lol but he also doesn't have to learn equations and solve physics problems on exams. He's excited about the surface of the topics.
@frenchyproductions9692
9 ай бұрын
@@EmpyreanLightASMR Nothing wrong with that. Not everyone can be an astrophysicist, but it's still integral to make sure laymen are involved in some way.
@EmpyreanLightASMR
9 ай бұрын
@@frenchyproductions9692 Agreed, I wasn't saying there's anything wrong with it. Anyone getting excited about physics is in for a good time. I've recently been thinking it would be cool to see Chuck go through a physics course, just to help him better appreciate the topic. It wouldn't dampen his enthusiasm, it might even elevate it. But it's not necessary.
@emark8928
7 ай бұрын
@@EmpyreanLightASMRTo be fair, Chuck has done exactly the same amount of academic research as Neil in the last twenty years.
@EmpyreanLightASMR
7 ай бұрын
@@emark8928 Neil reads papers and keeps up with a ton of peers, so I give him a pass for not focusing on one subject for a year
@jaymzs8221
9 ай бұрын
Something Neil said sparked a thought with me. What if light speed was not finite, but was instant. Imagine how that would change our whole view (or lack of view) of space? We could not look “back in time”. We would only see what is happening in that moment. Thank goodness light is “slow”.
@EmpyreanLightASMR
9 ай бұрын
There's articles you can google on how the speed of light may have changed since the beginning of time. (More specifically, that the speed has slowed down to what it is today.)
@kavorka8855
9 ай бұрын
I almost lost my stomach from laughter, Chuck is to blame 😂 and I learned soooo much! Happy New Year, Startalk!
@andrews8031
7 ай бұрын
You must be easily amused.
@LordOfThePancakes
5 ай бұрын
Nerd
@alexcharow7282
14 күн бұрын
Content like this is why I love KZitem. Thank you for taking the time to produce this.
@daveken9936
5 күн бұрын
KZitem has nothing to do with the production of anything that you see on it. They just are a parking lot for videos that they exploit.
@richardolson9732
3 күн бұрын
I’ve always heard the double slit experiment thing described as “when we look at it” instead of “when we shine light on it”. I wish they would use the latter - it clarifies things better. Thank you, Dr Tyson, for explaining that here.
@eddiecampbell3514
9 ай бұрын
This was by far a pretty great episode as well.. you guy's always knock it out the park because I'm sure there are those of us listener's and watcher's that also may have formed the very same questions in their mind from time to time so this was great to have them both actually ask their own questions and of course Neil always give thoughtful answer even if its somehow short as possible to save time or a truthfully answered question that says, quite frankly that even Not just Neil doesnt know but a whole planet of folks that hadn't come with an answer for a question that may never been asked or thought of or neil simply admits "idk, next question" lol i love it either way because its good that folks try to learn and sometimes there really isn't an answer because whe haven't found out yet, not that we haven't tried, bit that we just havent a clue and dont know how or what to measure for the answer to be revealed in the end.. we're all human, even the really smart ones.. lol love this show and just that single book alone that Neil showed everybody, "Physics of Energy " will have many nonstudents reaching for it to find out if its an interesting subject to learn and i agree that it would absolutely be a fun area to gain some knowledge and maybe even test ourselves against our previous knowledge if any to the newly learned knowledge gained. I love the contrast sometimes and of course love that physical learning process as it develops differently for each different thing and you get a better overall understandings for all those questions we may have had along the way. I love the learning process no matter the way because it always a curve to it and the speed of it changes as well too because some information cane be pretty dense and vast compared to other things that may be true objectively or may otherwise be seeming to be true but actually the opposite sometimes.. its always funny how that plays a tricks on some of our minds until we can actually really fully grasp exactly how vast of knowledge that can be gained and also applied too in the end.. that's just great and i love watching it unfold and really come to everyone learning man boy dont we all love Sir Chucks mind being blown at time hahaha love the show and even Gary has some good ones as well..❤❤😂😂🎉🎉
@psychomd1939
9 ай бұрын
Being from the deep, dark past of electronic communication (having been a Ham radio operator back in the 1950s), allow me to correct a very minor, error of no consequence. "Over and out," was from the movies and those copying the movies. Technically, it was either "over" or "out," not both. You either ended the communication or returned it to whoever was on the other end for them to respond. You allowed the other party to continue or to end the communication. If the other party was finished, they could tag it over if they had nothing else to say and allow you to continue or end the communication, depending on whether you were finished. Over.
@Denver_Risley
9 ай бұрын
It's amazing how things work. It's also amazing that anything works at all.
@Sunluvr1
13 күн бұрын
Chuck and Gary are such great co hosts - so much better than most others on other podcasts .
@VirtuosoVII
6 ай бұрын
“… where everything you say is delayed a half a second before the person replies you can’t, for example, interrupt them.” This is a major problem for Neil 😂
@ParadiseDB7
4 ай бұрын
Grow up. You're not funny
@cyberwolf6667
9 ай бұрын
I had to watch this twice!! I love it even more the second time Chuck, my brain is exploding, each time I listen. Your not alone Thanks to all of you Great show!!!
@stevepaul59
9 ай бұрын
Couldn’t have said it better. 👍
@WorldifySanity
8 ай бұрын
*you're
@petersage5157
9 ай бұрын
Giorgio is the Italian cognate of George. (I'm surprised I didn't even have to look that one up.) It's been suggested that the reason Brian May put his academic career in astrophysics on hold was because Galileo let him go. :p Hey, maybe StarTalk might be able to get Brian as a guest.
@MB-pm7jx
9 ай бұрын
I really enjoyed this video. I appreciate having an informed but non-scientist asking specific and interesting questions. Please do make this a reoccurring show!
@andrewtaylor-fq5vg
8 ай бұрын
What a great episode! Fantastic questions and comic interludes that makes you smarter and entertained. I loved it. On a side note, great thanks to Dr. Neil for the double slit experiment explanation regarding how photons interfere with electrons turning them into particles, not consciousness!
@davidatherton399
4 ай бұрын
Neil. How large is the universe? Neil: "yes"
@theMightywooosh
9 ай бұрын
Happy New Year everybody! Thanks for all the great videos
@EricRoss57
9 ай бұрын
".....went down a geek hole..." Too friggin' funny! 🤣
@d.h.2745
4 ай бұрын
I know I know
@oaguilera81
9 ай бұрын
This was an amazing episode. I loved it. Do it may be three or four times a year. It would be so cool.
@johannhuman532
7 ай бұрын
Great show! About the double slit experiment, I guess we have actually some explanation. It is that the electron has a probabilistic presence rather than a punctual position. And this probabilistic presence behaves like a wave in a vacuum. Until the particle interacts with something, there are situations where it can spread in space. So a more specific answer could be that the electron doesn't really interfere with itself, but its density of probability does interfere with itself.
@simonkristensson3077
Ай бұрын
I loved this episode! I think most question you answer from fans are so basic and repetitive and has been answered like hundreds times before and can be found from a simple search online. I would find it much more interesting to hear more burning questions and debates you have with colleagues about the uncertain things that are not yet fully understood by science. I find that much more stimulating. Thank you for a really good show!
@MerlinsDrAgon
9 ай бұрын
**The electron interference pattern doesn’t change simply by looking it at, it changes where you take the measurement - whether you decide to measure it or not**
@doug9172
2 ай бұрын
My brain hurts
@humanform5354
9 ай бұрын
Could NOT think of a better way to end the year for Star Talk. Cannot thank you guys enough for this 👏👏👏
@creaminmycookie
9 ай бұрын
Absolutely one of my favorite episodes! you guys are awesome
@EmpyreanLightASMR
9 ай бұрын
What is going on with your username and channel image lmao gotta admit, I was curious
@creaminmycookie
9 ай бұрын
@@EmpyreanLightASMR tbh I forget it's even that lmao it's been my gamertag on Xbox for forever it's just supposed to be funny lol
@EmpyreanLightASMR
9 ай бұрын
@@creaminmycookie It is, it's hilarious. I thought it was about coffee... then I did a double take and it said "cookie," and then it's either super naughty or ... an Oreo cookie lmao. No, it's a great name!
@sstacks8962
5 ай бұрын
Don't ever change what you guys have created excellent shows always appreciated
@kristiangreer5407
9 ай бұрын
I just wanna say I was here. 👏🙏 these discussions (not just this video but all star talk videos in general) have taught me so much. Thank you Neil and Chuck
@lindafox1679
9 ай бұрын
I love you guys! A great way to learn. Thank you❣️
@brianalper1825
9 ай бұрын
I LOVE it when you guys mix it up like this! Four letters: E P I C 🤩🤩🤩 (And “thank you”; keep bringing the fun!) Happy New Year!! 🥳💥🌄🎆🎊
@lurx2024
9 ай бұрын
Love you Neil, love you Chuck, and Gary O’Reilly makes a great addition to the discussion panel. I like it.
@marcglebocki6444
6 ай бұрын
Gary is such a square
@onebadtryhard1831
Ай бұрын
Need more of this I’ve been addicted to the show for some time
@anthonyjohndemaria185
9 ай бұрын
Great episode! I tune in frequently. I learned a new thesis of time. Thank you.
@francisjohnson665
9 ай бұрын
Love this show . ❤
@ismailnyeyusof3520
9 ай бұрын
Neil’s really special, a wonderful combination of brilliance, humour, humbleness and just enough edginess to be extremely attractive. The way he laughs and speaks about fundamentals is unmatched and he’s certainly an outstanding member of the pantheon of great scientific human beings that include Carl Sagan, Arthur C. Clark and Isaac Asimov. Of course there’s more but these names are at the top of my mind!
@PaulStSmith
9 ай бұрын
Hey, Neil, how would communication work in deep space if we could use quantum entanglement?
@TheMonkeydood
9 ай бұрын
Information cannot be sent faster than the speed of light
@2psnopod
8 ай бұрын
If i could pay to send a message to astronauts id say we have been trying to reach you about your satellites extended warranty 😂
@alexanderwim3139
Ай бұрын
The best show in the Universe! After the Big Bang, it's the most intriguing thing to watch.
@jc4418
9 ай бұрын
That light behaves like a particle and a wave
@StephenRayWesley
9 ай бұрын
But not at the same time only when observe it
@AndiRAin1
9 ай бұрын
Time is awesome. Love it.
@StephenRayWesley
9 ай бұрын
How long have time and you have been together
@xxzerobalaxxx229
7 ай бұрын
I appreciate you all You all always do my day you all smart and funny i love watching the trust and approval you guys have to each other
@よしとん-z6p
8 ай бұрын
Oh I enjoyed how passionate they became for their burning questions! Thank you so much Neil for explaining in layman’s terms!
@SkainzWorld
6 ай бұрын
The jokes and intellect. This channel is the only place i feel normal 😂 appreciate everything you guys do ✌🏿🖤🌅
@MsSunstoned
8 ай бұрын
I love this format. Hello everyone. Thanks for sharing. I'm with Chuck on Space Force.
@adhithyasrinivas8309
18 күн бұрын
Absolutely love Chuck's mental breakdown at 32:20 😂😂 He reacted for all of us
@andreprayer9530
2 ай бұрын
From this episode I have two questions , first the speed of light is the fastest thing in the medium of the universe but the universe is spreading faster than that, so what is time doing at that speed if it stops at the speed of light, moving backwards? Second question, when a particle is behaving like a wave , going up and down, what force is actually giving it those directional changes? It goes from moving straight, then hight by other particles when observed and changes to a wave pattern. Simply asked Why and how a wave and not just a directional change from the impact, why a wave/ back and forth/ zigzag motion? And what is controlling the predictable directional changes?
@calico27
5 ай бұрын
When Chuck's mind blew.. so did mine, and I wanted to jump up and down, screaming like him! This is awesome.. why isn't everyone running around screaming, trying to make sense of this!!!!
@R1CH130
9 ай бұрын
On the question about the size of the universe and the observable universe to us, I always wonder where the centre point of the big bang is! Also, how close are we to the centre, where the big bang took place? I guess we'll never know, but its always fascinated me! The idea that we could be relatively close to the centre, with even distance to the edge of the universe in all directions, or we could be right out towards the edge so that the universe is one direction, could expande many many more times further, than it does in another!
@extravagantpanda7962
9 ай бұрын
There is no center of the universe or any one point where the big bang happened. Think of the universe at the moment the big bang began as the surface of a very tiny sphere (not necessarily accurate but this is just an analogy). The big bang is just the rapid expansion of this sphere (like blowing up a balloon). The surface expands at each point in all directions simultaneously, and there is no one point anywhere on the surface that can intrinsically be called the center.
@olawalejunior7940
5 күн бұрын
41:33 "Cause you weren't born" Neil casually roasted Chuck there 😅😂
@EnchiladaBoulevard
7 ай бұрын
I'm buried under a veil of coming on senses. It feels to me like people in this area are conflicted about privacy v. secrecy while they're yearning to announce something they don't all want to, or don't feel they should announce. My poking at others has gotten a lot of clarity but not enough. In my opinion, if the situation runs around in metaphor and begets sides at one another's inputs, then too much secrecy is wreaking havoc. I'm here because I grew up in this spot so I don't want to abandon who were always here. I'll stay here no matter what feelings and I'll hold on together until I'm 85, like my mom did. If anybody hurts my feelings I'll stay true to them, anyway.
@KaterinaTalantliva
6 ай бұрын
the sweetest video ever!!!! thanks for noticing them!
@christopherblaisdel
7 ай бұрын
Dr Tyson, Isn't it true that if we had faster than light communication, either via subspace or a wormhole, and we used it to communicate with someone traveling near the speed of light away from us, and therefore time for him was moving slower, that he could experience the communication before we sent it? And doesn't this break in causality indicate that faster than light communication is in fact impossible?
@novaambience
9 ай бұрын
On the Epiphany episdoe on Spotify. I recognized the idea to x-ray a passing person, that same question I asked when I was a Kid or Pre-teen, you know you offer a lot of Exclusives that are indeed ignored or forgoten by the inter-national control program.. did you know that there are people that "ride a wave" of knowledge because they knew more underneath... those that don't have scientific money making skills that still help you think...same line of work as Neil Degrasse.... I knew a lot just like you. Wish it was easier to meet with your kind as well... Thank you for the endless support.
@torstendiekhoff
9 ай бұрын
@Prof. Tyson, love your insights on science! Quick burning question: At the equator, time is both faster (being further from Earth's center) and slower (due to higher velocity around Earth's center). Which effect is more dominant? Thanks for making science so engaging!
@evhwolfgang2003
9 ай бұрын
Keep listening, Chuck!
@aryangoswami7512
12 күн бұрын
What you said in the double slit experiment is that the particles interact with each other to cause the wave to end, but that has been debated for the last 100 years because the measuring device is made of particles, so the potential interacts with the potential. Human beings are also made of particles, meaning you cannot deny consciousness
@MsDsn420
5 ай бұрын
Think I am misunderstanding the time/ space graph analogy. Say time=x and space=y , at the speed of light... Why would(n't) the y and x be parallel (=)? Time is constant (As far as we are concerned) and speed of light{ls} is defined, so even at ls there is still a distance. Otherwise, travel to the past would simply be achieved "faster than light"( ftl) travel... Because y (on the graph) woud turn back on itself and supersede y. Am i seeing this wrong?
@orzogra2390
10 күн бұрын
I believe that is correct. Neil has mentioned before that from the point of view of a light particle, at the very same moment it is emitted it collides with a it's target. This is due to the effects of time dilation, which says that as speed increases, time slows. So basically, a photon does not experience time because it's speed becomes a hypothetical straight line perpendicular to the time axis, meaning it only has a velocity or speed and does not experience the passing of time. And theoretically, yes, if we were able to move faster than the speed of light or find a particle that does so (hypothetical tacheon) then that particle would be travelling backwards along the time axis, meaning it is going into the past. That is my understanding of the whole thing.
@ThizzRyuko
2 ай бұрын
I love rewatching episodes
@jimmyers4890
9 ай бұрын
To think about Galileo's experiment with finding the speed of light he didn't have the equipment to measure it. I think the same could apply when people think that a particle instantly moves from one place to another. It's not instant it's just moving so fast that we don't have the equipment to measure it.
@KaityWorldXYX
6 ай бұрын
Thank you Mitch, as Always!!
@garyluciani1082
8 ай бұрын
Interesting, instructive and very entertainig for someone like myself who has a surface level understanding of the questions asked here.
@MichaelSporbert-p5i
11 күн бұрын
I would like to know how can the matter in the universe end because of inflation of space? They say everything will end and the universe will just be empty and cold. I always thought that matter couldn’t be destroyed. So can you please explain this to me.
@andrearaimondi882
9 ай бұрын
Chuck’s questions are 🔥
@joeyinfn
4 ай бұрын
Lol Gary’s eyebrow raise when Neil says it’s his day after just cutting him off😂 21:10
@GAMEOVERTBH
9 ай бұрын
Chuck needs his own KZitem channel 👀 ❤️
@metroIex
9 ай бұрын
Great episode guys! Thanks
@MrTigerBubba
9 ай бұрын
Nice episode, yet there is one thing that Neil often underlines here about the Double Slit Experiment which puzzles me a bit and that is the "light-that-shines-on-the-electrons-when-you-look-at-them- is-responsible-for-their-particle-behaviour" - statement. From what I recall this experiment has been conducted in all sorts of environments to exclude the fact that any physical (intended as in physics) interaction could have an impact on the result...like for example recording the experiment through cameras and watching the results only AFTER the experiment has teaken place, in which case light or the presence of the human eye ON THE SCENE has nothing to do with the outcome. Like the the schrodinger cat "theory" speculates: events get determined once you measure them regardless of your presence (hence physical intercation) with the elements....which leads to the assumption that consciousness does have something to do with the outfolding of reality. Am I missing something here? ( I know I am of course...but...am I?) Luv the show btw. Cheers
@Morpheux1
9 ай бұрын
Cameras need light to record
@MrTigerBubba
9 ай бұрын
@@Morpheux1yep, they surely do 😂 yet the 2 different results ( lines vs wave pattern) occur in same light condition as I recall. The only differnce that triggers the lines is the observation (even recorded) to verifico which slit the particles travel through. So light has basically nothing to do with the differnt outcome as it doesnt change. I think that the proof to this is can be found in the delayed-choice quantum eraser where the result of the esperiment gets basically updated (going from wave to lines) in the very same test hence same light context
@d.b.cooper1
Ай бұрын
oof amazing all the way to the very end too. love it. discovered this over the past month & I'm hooked!
@Daniel-x6h3c
6 ай бұрын
Now a question occurred to me. If a supernova occurs, does the explosion of a star send matter in every direction, or does it continuously move away from us from which the speed it was going before it exploded, or does it send matter back towards us regardless of the speed at which it was moving away, and how are galaxies moving in our direction unless the universe did not come from a single point? Wouldn't everything appear to be red shifted, even the objects that are behind us from a singular point because of the speed at which we are moving away from?
@a.thiago3842
6 ай бұрын
For what i know, only the edge of the universe is moving fast than the speed of light. That's why the old galaxies at the border are redshifted. I mean, only the fabric of spacetime is moving faster than the speed of light and it's totally possible, remember that. The corpses and everything will never beat the speed of light. Our neighbors are indeed getting closer to us, but all the rest don't.
@gabrielacovay
9 ай бұрын
Dr. Tyson doesn’t believe consciousness impacts the double slit experiment. But I would like to genuinely understand why that’s not possible. The observer impacts the experiment by observing. An observer is conscious.
@extravagantpanda7962
9 ай бұрын
The word "observation" does not mean "a conscious observer literally looking at the particle with their eyes". In the case of the double slit experiment with electrons, this is not even possible as we can't directly see electrons. Rather, it just means "some interaction with the particle that results in its wave function collapsing to a 'pure' state", where "pure" here means a non-superposition state (when we "observe" or "measure" the particle, it has to be in some definite state). The actual interaction occurs at the subatomic level with the measuring device (whatever it happens to be), not due to a human projecting "consciousness rays" out of their eyeballs. The results of the experiment are identical regardless of whether a human or any other conscious being is present
@jimpiaz9537
6 ай бұрын
I've got a question. They've recently ( last decade ) started leaning more heavily on the notion that a detector involves itself with the electron before it enters the slits. My question is, is the detector reaching out somehow to interact with the electron, or is it passive? Or does the electron offer up information regardless of whether or not something is detecting? Or does it offer up information only when being detected? My other question is WHY !!!!?????
@a.thiago3842
6 ай бұрын
I wish i were a physicist. But for everything i ever read or watch, physicists cannot explain that, doesn't matter what, unfortunatelly! Even if you let the particle hit the back wall first and then measure it, it will give you different results. If you measure it before hitting he wall and then measuring it after hitting the wall, it will give you different results.
@Jeff-z3l3q
7 ай бұрын
"Mr Tompkins in Wonderland" is another must-read!
@user-tc1fw5ms5s
9 ай бұрын
Any episode w Chuck is going to be a great one, and Gary is a great addition too! Happy new years fellow StarTalk fans!
@RedNomster
9 ай бұрын
It's crazy that deepspace communication is so impossible that it'll actually be more tangible to have an advanced A.I. version of whoever we're needing to communicate with right there in our ship. Like, houston would be chatGPT3000, because an immediate (albeit possibly ill-informed response) would be more more effective than waiting months for an outdated response. Interesting. There's some concepts like that in the media, but generally it's because there's nobody left to communicate with (i.e. WALL-E), rather than they're simply too far away.
@fingerjackets4619
4 ай бұрын
What's up Neil Here is a thought regarding the double slit experiment/ Let me know what you think: Think of the similar water experiment where you can actually see the waves of water interfering with each other. Scattering on the far side/far wall. Now think of the double slit light experiment. Imagine there are waves of energy passing through the slits at all times you cannot see. The universe is full of energy (everywhere, all the time). As this energy is passing through these slits. This interfering wave pattern is always present (we just can't see it). As you send each particle of light through each individual slit. They follow these random wave patterns through the slit, and end up on the back panel. Wherever the interfering waves of energy may lead them. Hence the scattered pattern on the far wall. Now, when a detector is put in place. You are actually placing an object which is emitting an alternating magnetic/electric field into play. Which is why we get an alternating response from the detector. The alternating field is enough to disrupt the total scattered effect first seen. Which is why when the detector is turned off. The scattering of photons revert to following the streams of energy that are always present/flowing through the two slits....... Another way to think of it is.... : Think of the water experiment again. If you have totally calm water, with no waves. Then you put a piece of paper, or a boat into the calm water. When you send the boat towards the slits. The boat, or paper will pretty much go where you send it (as it travels, there will be some disturbance caused). Now, if you create a disturbance in the water, where the detector is located. You are creating waves/a current in the water closest to the nearest slit. Think of those waves created, as waves energy. This energy, or waves of energy is attracting the paper, or boat in that direction/the direction of the current. Similar to a drain. Or perhaps a river where one half is moving slowly, and the other half has a faster flow of water. The boat, or paper will want to move towards, or follow the current/energy which is moving faster. If said current alternates. The boat, or paper will also want to alternate its chosen path. One time it may pull towards the detector. The next time it may push............ I was watching this video: Quantum Reality: Space, Time, and Entanglement (kzitem.info/news/bejne/o3yoqKZuqIeHi4o) @ 15:23-15:27 you can almost see the wave patterns actually coming together/forming from the "output from the device", the speaker is referring to..."before" their laser has even been turned on...
@foxshot97
5 ай бұрын
chuck is the only person i know of who reacts to this stuff the way i feel like everyone should. people are way too calm when they describe the nutty way the universe works. everyone should be blowing a gasket the same way chuck does🤣
@dimpap404
4 ай бұрын
Even more brilliant than usual. Thank you Neil🎉
@bikerides-kf6qe
7 ай бұрын
The WHOLE thing about the "Understanding Spacetime" question is confusing, because we are NEVER still in space. We are ALWAYS moving in space. MAYBE he meant relative space, but that is not really space SPACE. Is it? Thanks, and blessings.
@joseimpact
9 ай бұрын
what a great episode and im half way through watching it
@jeffxanders3990
4 ай бұрын
I think Chuck is right about time in that it's not what we think it is. It has to have a direct relationship to our electromagnetic, mental being.
Пікірлер: 2,2 М.