Thank you so much for putting your effort to into making these videos. I wouldn't have had this much confidence for the upcoming AP physics exam without you!
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
So glad to help give you confidence. Best of luck on the exam!
@nipungorantla5760
3 жыл бұрын
OMG THANK YOU SO MUCH MR.P MY AP PHYSICS EXAM IS NEXT WEEK AND THIS WAS JUST A LIFE SAVER FOR CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING!!!!
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
YOU ARE WELCOME!!!!
@nipungorantla5760
3 жыл бұрын
@@FlippingPhysicsNO WAY YOU RESPONDED! Ahhh...wait. Is this Mr. P, Billy, Bobby or Bo? Actually, doesn't matter, let me take this opportunity to poorly deliver a physics joke! "Two cats slide down the roof. Which one hits the ground first? The one with the smaller 'mu'".
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
ha
@hafsahassan394
7 күн бұрын
Excellent water rocket and skates demostration!
@tetraizor
3 жыл бұрын
The parts with the derivation and changing-mass were the most mind blowing things ever! Thanks.
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I particularly enjoy that part myself!
@verberaunt
3 жыл бұрын
Sen AP alıyor musun?
@cemre3633
3 жыл бұрын
Haydaa
@tetraizor
3 жыл бұрын
@@verberaunt Genel olarak fizik ilgimi çektiği için izliyorum, AP ne oluyor tam olarak? Üniversitede gördüğümüz klasik mühendislik fiziğinden bir farkı var mı?
@verberaunt
3 жыл бұрын
@@tetraizor Abi sen üniversiteli misin?
@Nitstar6174
3 жыл бұрын
yo, here commenting to popularize this channel.
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
Nitin YT, I know I can always count on your support. Thanks!
@universebeyond4827
3 жыл бұрын
A fabulous Video.... as Always!! Thank you #FP😇 Though Not physically.. Its wonderful to join the class of you all...😄
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
It was lovely to have you in class!
@entertainingsouls7956
Жыл бұрын
U r channel deserve more than a million subscribers 😭✨🔥
@keerthanasatheesh9639
3 жыл бұрын
Hey Mr. P wonderful video again. Some suggestions here: I think the reason more people don't gravitate to your channel is because of how you read from a script and it can sometimes come off as unnatural. Other KZitem teachers also read from a script but I believe they make it seem natural more. After watching a recent casual video you posted about yourself, I realized how good your natural and spontaneous words are! We need more of that side of yours, Mr. P
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
Can you give me an example of an education channel (not edutainment) which is not a powerpoint or Khan Academy style where they seem more natural than I do?
@keerthanasatheesh9639
3 жыл бұрын
@@FlippingPhysics Here's a few: Brian Mclogan, Tyler Dewitt, Michel van Biezen, Yay Math, Eddie Woo and Seema Dhawan Arora Chemistry. There is also Bozeman science but maybe he's more presentation style too I think you teach a bit more like Professor Dave Explains, whose videos are amazing but sometimes it can come off as unnatural. (check his older videos like this one kzitem.info/news/bejne/kn2fwK55s5-AaIY) Maybe its because you look directly at the camera a lot? Idk Hope this helps Mr.P. Would love to see your channel grow. You completely deserve it:)
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
What I find funny about this comment is that I have also received a couple of comments recently suggesting I get a teleprompter and read from a script. (I actually do have a teleprompter and read from a script.) So, who knows. I'll just keep making great educational videos.
@jamesdpterodactyl3068
3 жыл бұрын
Ayyyy great video! What do you think of the ligma physics equation?
@Jacob.Peyser
Жыл бұрын
Newton’s original second law of motion ΣF=dp/dt is only valid when ṁ=0, because if ṁ≠0, then ΣF=d(mv)/dt=ma+ṁv. Assuming momentum conservation (i.e. ΣF=0), that would imply ma=-ṁv. However, that equation does not respect Galilean relativity; for instance, in the example of a rocket, propellant/mass is continuously ejected from the rocket at some exit velocity relative to the rocket, thereby causing an acceleration in the opposite direction of mass ejection by Newton’s third law of motion. In such a system, ΣF=0. Applying the equation just derived, ma=-ṁv, further implying that a=-ṁv/m. Except, as mentioned, the acceleration is due to the propellant moving with a relative exit velocity, not the velocity of the rocket (as depicted in the equation). And so there is a contradiction. The problem is that generally, ΣF≠dp/dt. If ṁ≠0, then the correct formulation of Newton’s second law of motion is ΣF=ma+ṁc, where ‘c’ is the relative velocity between the ejected (or even absorbed) mass and the accelerating body. I learned this the hard way when attempting to derive the rocket equation the ‘easy way’ by using Newton’s (invalid) second law of motion, only to be puzzled when my result didn’t match up with the actual rocket equation.
@gopal7694
3 жыл бұрын
Sir your video of polarisation was awesome but i have some doubts: 1)you said that wall doesn't get charged by induction it gets charged by polarisation but in induction polarisation happens so can't we say that it is charging by induction? 2)what should we say the can is charged by induction or polarisation or confuction?
@783c
4 ай бұрын
Underrated tysm 😭
@Channel-dp3wc
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome
@johanfrancis2001
3 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU
@jetpix
Жыл бұрын
Thankyou a load sir.
@julielangenbrunner9212
3 жыл бұрын
Rocket looks great!
@julielangenbrunner9212
3 жыл бұрын
Video looks great too! Newton's own words are super confusing, though (he seems to use "alteration of motion" and "motion" interchangeably!). I'd ask him for a rewrite, personally.
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
I'll see if I can contact him for you. Perchance do you know his Twitter handle?
@agk5667
3 жыл бұрын
👍
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
😬
@MrBeklager
3 жыл бұрын
As a rocket scientist I gotta say this was a well put together video!
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks?
@Hanuman120
3 жыл бұрын
👍
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
😬
@verberaunt
3 жыл бұрын
Me: OMG I have to study the Conservation of momentum and click youtube Mr.P:Just a second!...
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
Glad to help!
@abinashbastola1771
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for teaching me Physics this year!
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
Happy to help!
@rithvikyagnamurthy6560
3 жыл бұрын
Yet another brilliantly done video, great job!
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback!
@bzunderdog695
Жыл бұрын
Quick question, so because of the water rocket example: water having negative momentum and the rocket having positive momentum. Is the reason for the mini explosion in the middle at the paused freeze frame time a result of both momentums being equal and opposite to each other? Like because of Newtons 3rd law F12 = -F21 the system of the objects overall forces are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction, does this result in the mini burst of water between the rocket and water system. I understand what was said in the video (TYSM your videos are godtier) but I am just curious what specifically caused that mini explosion if the Systems momentum is conserved.
@isaacmulak958
Жыл бұрын
0:56 petition to rename Newton Seconds to "Uhhhh"
@natureslover6453
3 жыл бұрын
These days I have doubt in this topic and finally today I am satisfied .💞thanku.
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
You are welcome.
@adithyabhaskara4107
3 жыл бұрын
Around 0:24, there seems to be an edited jump cut in which you say "Mome-[CUT]momentum," I believe this was in error? However, this is very minor and it is extremely easy to understand.
@adithyabhaskara4107
3 жыл бұрын
Looks good otherwise!
@FlippingPhysics
3 жыл бұрын
Actually, that is just me stumbling over a word. I decided a few months ago to be okay with mild stumbles over words like that. I think it makes me seem more human. Thanks for checking out the video!
@adithyabhaskara4107
3 жыл бұрын
@@FlippingPhysics Absolutely, that makes sense, thank YOU!
Пікірлер: 56