Now you need to look at Philippines and US battles over the Philippine Sea and Islands.
@hanrenfighterjet
2 күн бұрын
US wont help the phillipines. no profit in it unlike taiwan
@timonsolus
Күн бұрын
@@hanrenfighterjet : Wrong. US and Philippines now have a formal military alliance. US is just as committed to the defence of the Philippines today as it was back in 1941.
@hanrenfighterjet
Күн бұрын
@@timonsolus USA had the same formal military alliance. with Kabul. LOL
@timonsolus
Күн бұрын
@@hanrenfighterjet : Yes - until Trump betrayed the Afghans by making a deal with the Taliban. In accordance with his philosophy of “America First - and to hell with everyone else”.
@grimreapers
Күн бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/zGyVk6eipH2hn2k
@wlan246
2 күн бұрын
Reading the video title, my first thought was, "Why would the U.S. help China attack Taiwan?"
@DadaduduxD
2 күн бұрын
Imagine if China and the USA teamed up or formed the G2 which was something actually going around in discourse in the early 2000s lol
Because Communism is stupid. Due to the fact that humans are greedy. Why is it that those in leadership roles are wealthy, and 'The People' are enpoverished? The idea is wonderful, but it will Never work because there are evil/greedy humans in the mix! Bureaucracy is the Most heinous thing that humankind has ever done to fuck their own successful civilizations! Started with good meanings and, so far, has failed Every time! Even the U.S. has started down that path. It is a Human condition. Or, everyone could accept the gift of the World's Lord, Savior, and Redeemer Jesus Christ! But to each their own.
@veryanonymous5423
Күн бұрын
That's just how OP Taiwan really is. Need to team up, obviously
@Four9sFineJewelry
2 күн бұрын
It’s insane to me that KZitem would demonetize your channel. You’re showing a video game. No blood. No nudity. Not sex. Hardly any cursing.
@TheStormpilgrim
Күн бұрын
Come to think of it, the cursing has diminished quite a bit over the years. It might go away entirely when he gets an upgraded PC.
@unskilled822
Күн бұрын
its r3tarded bcoz there are other youtubers who literally dont do anything other than watching someone else doing stuff, its literal stealing content but yeh theres nothing wrong with that, in comparison, this takes a lot of effort, programming, testing, the simulation is so complex to a point where you may even use it before an actual attack to a positive result but thats youtube for you, they censor alot of non insults, will refuse to pay to actual content creators but they'll pay handsomely to the brain rot creators
@FreedomFox1
Күн бұрын
I’ve noticed that videos about conflict with Iran and China get demonetized pretty routinely. I’m guessing it’s one of those things the US only wants approved news sources to discuss
@blueskies1237
Күн бұрын
@@Four9sFineJewelry if you dig into KZitem a little bit, you’ll find that Google is a company run by children for the benefit of those children.
@vjdsjgc123
16 сағат бұрын
Wait KZitem demonetized Grim??
@blademaster2390
Күн бұрын
Can we all stop to appreciate that one F-5 that survived all the way to the end, and was, from the looks of it, leading the charge to shoot down one of the Chinese AWACS at the end? Like…those things entered service in the ‘60s.
@140theguy
Күн бұрын
F5 has always been a Goat.🐐
@xpk0228
Күн бұрын
ROCAF F5s lived a great life. They were here back when we had absoulte air dominance over the strait, before the 90s. We were launching F5s and F104s to intercept as soon as PLAF mig 21s left mainland.
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
Wow, just wow...
@ohboah320
2 күн бұрын
The F16's taxiing to take off have unburdened themselves from what has been
@AIM-120D_AMRAAM
Күн бұрын
They must have grown up in a middle class family
@coreymoyers5771
2 күн бұрын
Did you give up on Rumble? Their search functionality is garbage, but I would suffer through it to help you monetize your videos.
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
It worked Ok but you don't really get any $ from it at all which is sad. Maybe I'll re-visit it at some point.
@peedypxblo
2 күн бұрын
NO F-22 ???! 😩
@Hurricayne92
2 күн бұрын
Are there any based in the Phillipines? I was sure there are only 35s in Okinawa. They cant take off from carriers right?
@Yorktown_ll
2 күн бұрын
F-22 does not take off from carriers only f-35 and older jets
@Variable-2-actual
2 күн бұрын
F-22's are land based jets not equipped for carrier operations. They'd have to come from Japan or the Philippines if they are there. Or Alaska. They could probably get there in 5-6 hours if needed.
@TeViiNz
2 күн бұрын
@@Hurricayne92 I pretty sure theres a few f22s at kadena in Okinawa. I dont think they are officially stationed there but I believe theres always a few on the property.
@MartinSparks-ef9gr
2 күн бұрын
F-22 was rosterd in for vacation .
@banditkfk1463
2 күн бұрын
Every day that starts with words "hello valued viewers" can't suck 😂
@dsong2006
2 күн бұрын
JH-7 is from the late 80s to early 00s and is actually probably the first borderline 4th gen aircraft of any type that China produced. It's wasn't a great aircraft by any parameters but still serves the "anti ship bomb trunk" role relatively effectively even today.
@Archer89201
21 сағат бұрын
With the tiny number of Ukrainian Su-24s with Stormshadows still being a pain in the ass for Russia 2 years in war , those 100 plus JH-7s with cruise missiles are still a valid threat
@spinmaster4348
2 күн бұрын
23:57 And Taiwan has its own SM-2 capable Kidd/KeeLung class that you excluded and are capable of intercepting supersonic cruise missiles. Taiwanese Perrys and could launch Hsiang Feng AShMs as well, which comes in with land based version and is totally missing here also. This can also be carried by some modern Taiwanese corvettes, which are armed with amraam-like TC-2 missiles and will be able to intercept some supersonic AShMs too.
@spinmaster4348
2 күн бұрын
16:06 Taiwan has acquired at least 600 pac3 interceptors from US by 2024, with newer batches coming in as MSEs. And there are at least 3 TK3 regiments deployed as of now, with newer THAAD-like improved versions underway.
@blademaster2390
Күн бұрын
Not to mention the fact that Taiwan (or at least the US CSG in the area) has Arleigh-Burke Destroyers, which are capable of carrying and launching SM-3 ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missile) interceptors. So…zero reason for every ballistic missile fired in phase 1 of this scenario to hit their target, and multiple reasons for most (if not all) of them being intercepted outright.
@Idontwantahandle6669
Күн бұрын
@@blademaster2390patriots don’t work as well as advertised. The Russian MOD has uploaded numerous videos of single Iskander missiles destroying Patriot sites. This is more realistic than you want to accept.
@aligator2150
Күн бұрын
@@Idontwantahandle6669 They don't work at all, 3 patriot missiles couldn't intercept a single Su-34... that is more a fat bomber than an agile fighter.
@clivereid
Күн бұрын
@@Idontwantahandle6669 Source? The only one I've seen hit launchers that were being transported, I.E. not active.
@voidtempering8700
Күн бұрын
@@blademaster2390 Taiwan doesn't have any Arleigh burke destroyers. Where did you get that information from?
@dobster5819
Күн бұрын
Well done on 400k Grim Reapers, thanks Cap and Boys.
@kdaltex
2 күн бұрын
LRASM needs a terminal phase booster to sprint to the finish at Mach 2
@EstorilEm
2 күн бұрын
I it just needs a more accurate stealth model in terminal phase. They wouldn’t get picked off like that.
@kdaltex
Күн бұрын
Itd be cool to see them test our ideas. Better stealth or boosters. Drone missile carrier ships networked with aegis, etc
@Jack_Over9000
2 күн бұрын
Cap hates that Super Bogs won the day, I bet!😆 Thanks for all the effort you put into these, it shows, I've seen some of the old ones. "This is the last one of Taiwan I'll ever do", famous last words, Cap 2024.
@ianmackenzie212
Күн бұрын
Not being an ass. Just fyi super bugs as they are super hornets. Hornets=bugs
@qfinck
Күн бұрын
@@ianmackenzie212 The Hornets have been called Bogs on this channel for years. You can dig into older videos and find the reason why but Bogs not bugs here.
@Jack_Over9000
Күн бұрын
@@ianmackenzie212 Yeah it's a play on words and a meme on this channel. Because the FA-18 is so easy.
@MrWhiskers65
2 күн бұрын
400k subscribers! Congratulations 👏
@ChristopherMallonMusic
Күн бұрын
Funny part is the boring talky part is my favourite part of the videos.
@trev8591
Күн бұрын
He should be called "Dong Long" to give him a bit of kudos with the Chinese airforce. That must have taken hours and hours to get ready, thank you, Cap! One of the Testes!
@LeoChen-v6z
Күн бұрын
I think china also has a modified copy of "DCS" and ppl on bilibili has made videos about china vs the US and china almost always wins. The bilibili channel plays what is called DCS but the shaders and shit does not look like DCS but it does look VERY similar.
@thetinker
2 күн бұрын
These sims are interesting, thanks! I wonder if it would work for you to record the sim at reduced speed, then playback at regular, adding commentary at that point.
@wlan246
Күн бұрын
i thought of that too, but imagine the poor guy having to re-record, or at least re-dub, his comments as he speeds it back up...
@thetinker
Күн бұрын
@@wlan246 Yea, whatever ends up working bettor for him; I just thought if it avoided having to redo it multiple times, because it crashed halfway or whatever(which sounded like what was happening to him), that could be better for him. Then only having to voice over once...
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
It would yes BUT because I'm not running it live I'm pretty sure the commentary will be stale and boring.
@thetinker
23 сағат бұрын
@@grimreapers Thanks for doing these! Please don't take these as a criticism; I just like trying to think of things that may help. You have a good point there, it could. The reactions to seeing it the first time are often the best! One way around that I suppose would be someone else recording it in slow mo and/or joining for the normal speed post commentary so you or them are seeing it for the first time. Could be complicated one way or the other. I'm sorry these end up being such a technical challenge and I'm glad to be able to see them whatever way works out for you. Thanks :)
@groorg24
Күн бұрын
But all those US drones sleeping on the bottom of the ocean...🤫
@RedneckRapture
Күн бұрын
This battle was an unmitigated disaster for the Chinese. Given the casualties that happened in this battle, it’s safe to assume that China’s not going to be able to land troops on Taiwan, having failed to neutralize the US task force in the area nor the Taiwanese Air Force. Even if the Taiwanese Air Force was wiped out like their SAMs were, the fact that there’s still a US presence in the area, combined with the Chinese PLAAF losses, means sending over any troop ships would result in their sinking. The remaining Chinese ships would also need to leave the area very quickly because they’re primary targets for the US Navy at that point. With how many pilots were killed in the fighting as well as the missile attack against a US carrier battlegroup, China would be at war with the United States after this battle and Taiwan would be an excellent staging area for US forces to fight China from.
@hughmungus2760
Күн бұрын
the US carrier would be in a dire situation after this battle because its liteally in spitting distance of like, the entire PLARF which would be unloading everything they have at the carrier from land based launchers. Even if the fleet defense can shoot everything fired at it. china simply has too many missiles and would quickly run down the VLS on the carrier escorts Whats not being modelled is the vast numbers of PHL16 GMLRS strikes on taiwan which would dwarf the number of ballistic missiles china has, these would be peppering taiwan's airfields every few minutes effectively shutting down the taiwanese airforce.
@RedneckRapture
Күн бұрын
@@hughmungus2760 Good luck with that. Most of Taiwan's airfields that would be used in the event of war with China are buried in their mountains. Largely untouchable by Chinese missile forces unless they go nuclear. You didn't know that Taiwan essentially has two hollowed out mountains serving as airfields that house hundreds of their aircraft? Course you know what else isn't modeled in this scenario? HELIOS, which has been steadily added to US Navy ships as they cycle in and out of port since 2022. China would have to nearly exhaust its ASMs in order to sink that carrier battle group since resupplied fighters could shoot down those older ASMs alongside the ship based SAMs and the HELIOS, and then the entire rest of the US Navy's a week, at most, out. Course that won't happen because China will need its Air Forces elsewhere, as it'll start being attacked from Guam, Japan, South Korea, and have B-2's and, soon, B-21's penetrating its airspace from the US while B-52's and C-17's unload missile attacks from over a hundred miles offshore.
@hughmungus2760
Күн бұрын
@@RedneckRapture underground airbases... think about that for a second. Thats not practical because planes still need a runway to take off and having them fly through a hole in the side of a mountain to take off and land avengers style is ridiculously dangerous. No at best the hangers might be covered by a mountain but the hanger entrances can still be stuck, while the runways themselves are completely unsheltered. Ship based lasers are barely capable of handling subsonic drones much less supersonic and hypersonic antiship missiles in any significant volume. They are at best a cheaper, more accurate CIWS: a last ditch defense when all other layers have failed. They're not going to save you if your VLS cells have been depleted. The rest of the US fleet would have to trickle in from across the world and reach the theatre of battle while the entire chinese navy (as well as airforce and rocket force) is sitting right there. The local numerical superiority of the chinese firepower will make it impossible for any US surface vessel to get anywhere near the chinese coast. B2s or no, the US will be forced to use standoff weapons against china if it wants any chance of its bombers surviving. The PLAAF is fighting over friendly airspace where it has total air supremacy while the US cannot hope to escort its bombers over chinese airspace with fighters just because of the ranges involved. The US only has maybe 10,000 standoff weapons that are usable (aka non-nuclear) while the number of military, industrial and logistics targets in china number in the millions. Pentagon wargames have time and time again shown that the US just runs out of ammunition when fighting any real war with china. Hell when you look at ukraine, after 2 years of long range strikes the Russians still hasn't managed to knock out their power grid despite tens of thousands of drone/missile attacks. What chance does the US have against a continent sized country like China?
@NowayPlucko
23 сағат бұрын
Dude.. it just is a simulation with a lot assumptions and simplifications. This has very little to do with reality which is infinitely more complex. So pipe down on the conclusions you seem to want to see. 😂
@RedneckRapture
21 сағат бұрын
@@NowayPlucko Not going for conclusions, going for people to go back and forth with on this to waste a bit of time in pleasant debate while doing defensive driving classes, bro.
@FleetDefenderRA5
2 күн бұрын
CAP made the correct comment: suppose all this happened at once? Could the computing power of the various units handle it? There would be planes, missiles, drones, decoys... I am guessing they stress test all the computers to see what happens... but there would be an unimaginable number of contacts to manage.
@Bloodwhiner
Күн бұрын
It is so hard to wrap your head around the height and speed of the missile intercepts. Two items the size of a small car hitting each other at 30-40 miles away traveling at mach 4. Such a scenario was unfathomable just a few years ago. And those will be obsolete in another decade or so as laser and railgun munitions mature.
@DangerRussDayZ6533
Күн бұрын
The US sends more than 30 billion to Ukraine quarterly. That's a drop in the bucket.
@andyyang5234
Күн бұрын
This is just one battle, though admittedly there's unlikely another one of the same scale. My main gripe would be that both sides know this would be _the_ battle, so China is more likely to send a larger portion of their navy/air force over from other sectors to participate. The number is probably a huge underestimate compared to a battle IRL.
@pike100
Күн бұрын
@@andyyang5234Wouldn't the USA also send over a larger portion of their Navy and Air Force? After all, America can't allow Communist China to take over Taiwan's extremely valuable chip industry.
@honeyforce996
Күн бұрын
1 trillion dollars every 100 days
@shaunholt
2 күн бұрын
Four people: 1st!!! 😃 Seven people: 2nd! 🙂 🙄🙄🙄
@nathancovell6033
Күн бұрын
I went on this quest 😂
@jacobtrapp3772
2 күн бұрын
You kind of do have control over what way the planes take off from the runway. I've found if you want them to take off a certain way you have to use the weather tab. Make the wind go in the right direction for a good head wind, so the opposite way they will take off, then it works most of the time. The biggest problem is the AI just NOT doing anything half of the time.
@grimreapers
Күн бұрын
I've heard people say about the wind before but for me it never seems to make any different?
@vipondiu
2 күн бұрын
Thanks for taking the time to create this wonderful simulations, these are my favorite GR content!
@Meatcyclops
2 күн бұрын
Let’s get an I9, 4090 Ti, 990 pro ssd, and some high speed 128gb ram
@grimreapers
Күн бұрын
Yes plz.
@grav4315
2 күн бұрын
Hey Cap, hypothetical question. If you ran the simulation on slow speed could your pc handle having all the assets at once? I am thinking you could pre record the video and then react to a sped up version.
@Variable-2-actual
2 күн бұрын
He should get a server for each force but I don't think he's got the money for that.
@unskilled822
Күн бұрын
problem is too many IA script running at once and constantly reacting to the environment will create huge fps lags, you can however set it to spawn 100 enemies, when the hundred dies then you spawn another 100 and so on; i wonder if quantum processor computers would be able to simulate this without any lag at all that would be awesome and allow the making of huge battles where thousands fight each other
@duanemckinley9353
Күн бұрын
@@unskilled822 The problem, as I understand it, is that DCS is designed for single core rather than multi-core and modern CPUs get their performance largely through having many cores. A modern gaming laptop often has 24 cores (with an i9-13900hx for example) but DCS won't make use of it resulting in 10% or so of the CPUs potential performance. On the high-end workstation CPU, you can get up to 96 cores, but DCS will have little to no performance improvement because of old software engineering.
@grimreapers
Күн бұрын
That probably would work yes, but it's hard for me to commentate on that type of setup if you know what I mean.
@sshumkaer
Күн бұрын
The only question to the puzzle is, WILL USA HELP TAIWAN. If so the answer is easy YES.
@bluetech2809
Күн бұрын
I don't think the US would help Taiwan. I think the push to move semiconductor tech and production away from Taiwan is precisely so that we won't have to help Taiwan. I know that sounds terrible for Taiwan (and it is) but I just don't see the US risking nuclear war over a tiny island when NATO won't even directly intervene against Russia (which is arguably far weaker than China).
@mburland
Күн бұрын
Nic Cage returns in the long awaited sequel: Gone in 180 Seconds
@EvilGPT
Күн бұрын
That anti missile system was battered so badly it's texture was blown off 😮
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
oof
@bulldoguk2086
Күн бұрын
In reality, China would have moved in assets from other commands to assist.
@good4politics
Күн бұрын
Capt, you may not know this but you need to see a vocal/singing specialist/coach. At least part of your problem is you are likely pushing the tone/frequency lower than your vocal chords can support. At a minimum a singing specialist can help you change how you talk in ways that will reduce stress on your Larynx. You may not like what they recommend but your have a problem that must be addressed. You have to manage this on IT's terms rather than your preferences. GOOD LUCK
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
Thanks but I think I've found out whats going on with my voice. Please hit me up in Discord if you want to chat.
@mrlodwick
2 күн бұрын
Great job Capt!
@bladeslicemaster5390
2 күн бұрын
Thanks for the hours spent putting this together Cap!
@MTBScotland
2 күн бұрын
you need to get a threadripper
@QuentinStephens
Күн бұрын
I understand the server software is still largely single-threaded.
@ddddddddd574
Күн бұрын
"You need to listen to the brief or it wont make any sense" Also "nothing has changed so im not going to go into detail"....
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
lols
@timonsolus
Күн бұрын
The ace Chinese pilot's name is actually Wang Long.
@hf117j
Күн бұрын
He tried to warn his buddy about the Americans behind him by shouting his name. But all he got out was "Sum Ting Wong"
@pike100
Күн бұрын
@@hf117j IMO, this kind of joke is racist - from a patriotic American.
@-aepo-
Күн бұрын
@@hf117j they also shouted out "Ho Lee Fuk," and "Bang Ding Ow!"
@hf117j
Күн бұрын
@@pike100 As an Asian American. Cry over your own cause, not someone else's. My grandma is from korea, met my papa during the korean war. Meals at her place were usually rice and bulgogi. She had a five gallon bucket of soy sauce and a pallet of rice bags like 3 feet high. Up to the kitchen counter. She gave me bowl cuts til I was 12 ish and stopped letting her cut my hair. When trump was elected, I was called numerous mexican slurs. Because apparently some people think only Mexicans have that shade of skin. Speaking of. When I wasn't with my grandma or parents, I was with who I consider my other family. A Mexican family with 12 kids, 2 biological and the rest adopted. I got to experience riding in the trunk of the suv with two other kids, looking out the back window as Gasolina by daddy yankee played. Then on top of that, I had one white friend and mostly black friends through high school. As far as racism goes. Learn the nuance between a joke, learn the few words you don't say. Otherwise screw off
@pike100
Күн бұрын
@@hf117j I stand by what I said; that was a racist joke. We should be better than that.
@bc3713
22 сағат бұрын
Tough to call it a sim when one side is airborne and the other is just taking off
@billwhoever2830
Күн бұрын
About The Numbers: You used 33% of the aircraft and ships on both sides except for the USN 7th fleet, you should have removed some of the escort destroyers to account for the smaller anti ship strike coming from China. You only used 10% of the Ballistic Missiles that took out 33% of the Taiwanese SAMs, would the rest 23% of the BMs attack the airports? Such an attack would happen so fast that most of the jets that are not already in the air wouldn't be able to take off due to destroyed runways. About The US Carrier Group: In reality the USN 7th fleet wouldn't be that close to the island because after the battle the fleet would be depleted of JETs and SAMs and would be an easy target for Chinese bombers. In case to have any chance of remotely stopping a Chinese landing operation at least 3-4 US carrier groups would be needed both to be able to absorb the amount of missiles the Chinese fleet will send and to have enough ships-missiles-aircraft to survive the aftermath of the battle. The US flight groups are supposed to perform bombings on the Chinese landing ships too which are an extra task that would be happening at the same time. The Chinese Fleet might even attempt a direct attack at gunfire range if they can catch up to a partially damaged Carrier.
@Amexel
2 күн бұрын
JH-7 first flew in 1988... not 1950's aircraft lmao, but idk if they even exist in DCS so prolly don't matter for this
@corvanphoenix
16 сағат бұрын
I blame them for demonetising you as they are trying to turn everything into generic crap just to make it easier to sell ads.
@CLGL9-yv8kh
2 күн бұрын
Why would you give the US 6 Arleigh Burke III's? If all the assets are divided by three, then that would imply the US sent 18 Arleigh Burke III's to this battle when only 1 has been built in real life. Also, the Chinese would 100% attack Taiwanese airfields here and I see you're still having the Chinese ships carry land attack missiles which they can't use in this battle, which is even more ridiculous than usual as there are land targets to attack here.
@AmirShafeek
2 күн бұрын
Go through most of the videos involving the chinese if the Americans arent given a buff of some kind its always a close call if not a loss for America.
@EstorilEm
2 күн бұрын
@@AmirShafeeksounds realistic to me 🙄
@xterra4hire
2 күн бұрын
@@AmirShafeekhahaha. Thats rich
@AmirShafeek
2 күн бұрын
@@xterra4hire something can be rich and true at the same time so no argument from me
@jkull173
Күн бұрын
“In real life” 😂😂😂
@lodis5811
5 сағат бұрын
i guess the chinese wouldnt attack runways in their first strike, and the f35 would just know when the strike happened and to be at taiwan instantly.
@stargixxer7125
2 күн бұрын
Great work Cap, always appreciated by the VV's!
@cuz129
Күн бұрын
The amount of work you put into these simulations is incredible. Thank you and your team!
@jeremyjackson8196
2 күн бұрын
I thought capt was going to apologize to the CCP for a second.
@thetruth1
Күн бұрын
As far as the computing overload, you could run the simulation at half speed and then double the speed in editing. (Quarter then quadruple?)
@ROTNReaper
2 күн бұрын
That patriot radar isn't a patriot radar... that's more of the new LTAMDS with 360 capability
@grimreapers
Күн бұрын
Yes I noticed that also.
@timbaskett6299
Күн бұрын
FYI Cap, I always watch the "Talky Bits" 😂.
@a24396
2 күн бұрын
Yes... It could.
@JonTan-z3e
16 сағат бұрын
no offense but why are we ignoring the massive amounts of ballistics ,cruise and anti ship missiles with hundreds to thousands of kilometer range?
@knightonwarbeck1969
2 күн бұрын
un-CAP-PED Greatness. Not sure if anyone else feels the same when I say your formation flying is the highlight for me. The shenanigans and everything else is good but the tight formation flying is the real highlight for me. Perhaps this is engrained in me watching your 1160 Mile Long Distance Strike video, with fully loaded Tomcats closely together, then having a another jet like the Flanker scoot up along side, joining you, and we get to see the differences between the jets or, a little Green Button with its puny engines trying to breathe fire. So, always a pleasure when you and Simba and all the fellas squeeze together for the in or egress. Very nice to see formation landing as well. Cheers.
@alphgeek
Күн бұрын
Playing this scenario in CMANO took weeks off my life.
@SuperiorAutocraft
14 сағат бұрын
Run simulation at 0.5x. Watch KZitem at 2x. Problem solved.
@klarsen100
Күн бұрын
what are your PC specs? maybe we can gofund some new parts!
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
AMD5900X 3080 32gb
@philm3509
Күн бұрын
Wonder if America or China has quantum computers that can run a full simulation, I’m sure one or both do?
@ChrisBrocksmith
Күн бұрын
CAP is running the Boeing Super Computer!
@diojiabunai
2 күн бұрын
Amer'ca is the best! We'd be happy to take England back with a slight change to the relationship dynamic. Whadd'ya say UK... Wanna be *our* colony for a while?
@ivorharden
2 күн бұрын
Well, the politicians in the UK seem adequate compared to those running for president, so.....
@timonsolus
Күн бұрын
Not until the MAGA cult is history. Bring back the old 1990's / 2000's GOP (Grand Old Party) with a sensible leader similar to John McCain. Until then, the Republicans should not be in power.
@squiremc
Күн бұрын
Thank you for the considerable work required to make this happen. You are a master of this simulator and your fairmindedness in the treatment of attacking and defending forces is the main reason for the very entertaining character of your videos. I am always concerned the allies might not prevail and this keeps me on the edge of my seat. Your videos are an everyday watch for me. Please keep up the good work!
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
thxx
@geekpoet7443
2 күн бұрын
CAP, I suggest you don't run any apps that monitor performance because they will eat up resources trying to track everything.
@grimreapers
Күн бұрын
This is an in-game app so doesn't use any resources I'm pretty sure.
@hughmungus2760
Күн бұрын
Having F35s take off one at a time from LHDs is much more realistic anyway since before they'd all vertically take off which they can't do IRL
@yetanotherstronk
Күн бұрын
There being a few mins after launch during which the ballistic missiles are detectable, could the batteries be truck mounted and essentially scatter in all directions in the event of unstoppable incoming that appears aimed at air defence? Perhaps the modern missiles take unpredictable trajectories until the last few seconds, to keep their targets unclear?
@ivorharden
2 күн бұрын
Viewington here
@Archer89201
22 сағат бұрын
The chinese have about 100 Su 27SK, 100 Su-30MK and MK2 and 24 Su-35s , those are not negligible numbers but about the size of most medium ranked air forces in combat aircraft. Also an attack on Taiwan would see more than just a single theatre command and would see the aircraft get reinforced form other commands. Also 300 JH-7s can launch cruise missiles and anti radiation missiles too like the Ukrainian Su-24s are doing with stormshadows.
@sp00f64
2 күн бұрын
No apologies necessary Cap!
@sergeantklein6026
2 күн бұрын
These are the best!
@scottsommers5994
Күн бұрын
Hi Cap there is old series called Dogfights that might the team might be interested in recreating
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
I remember it!
@TheRdwyer
11 сағат бұрын
Using all available forces,. could have been an awesome 3 part series, since realistically no country would commit their entire military, certain pct would be kept in reserve.
@thereble101
Күн бұрын
2:10 According to The War Zone Taiwan has currently 141 F-16s fully upgraded to the V standard with a further 66 newly built Block 70 jets on order all of which are equiped with APG-83 AESA radars.
@MilitaryTechNerd006
2 күн бұрын
Recommend a threadripper, 4090, and 64gb of ram
@Reniconix
Күн бұрын
In another video a while back he mentioned the mods they use can't make use of multi-core processing, it causes tons of bugs, so a threadripper would be a waste of money for them.
@MilitaryTechNerd006
5 сағат бұрын
@@Reniconix damn that suckz
@chrisshriner7222
Күн бұрын
If getting demonitized is such an issue, why don't you start up a Patreon to help support your efforts. You've got 400k subscribers...pretty sure quite a few of those enjoy your content enough to put a few bucks towards helping you make more of it.
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
roger will push Patreon.
@matthewkern3619
2 күн бұрын
Why did Taiwan do well? Xi no longer has the "Mandate of Heaven." Look that up.
@MrYaxalot
Күн бұрын
Is it a computer power issue or is it a core dcs issue with the counts of objects in game?
@timonsolus
Күн бұрын
Computer power issue. CAP doesn't have a £10,000 PC.
@TheRaginCajun6
Күн бұрын
Where's my old ship the USS Blue Ridge? Haha. It has two CIWS that could help also towed sonar array😉
@canadagooses
Күн бұрын
the HHQ-9B is WAY over modeled cap. The missile is based off of the s-300 missile which fairs terribly against modern cruise and ballistic missiles.
@voidtempering8700
Күн бұрын
It doesn't fair horribly against cruise and ballistic missiles. The flight characteristics of the missile is fine, it's just that Russia lags behind in radar and computer technology. China doesn't.
@pike100
Күн бұрын
*fares, not fairs
@hughmungus2760
Күн бұрын
comparing the HHQ9B to the original S300 is like comparing the SM6 to the original SM2 from the 80s it was based off.
@Sebastian-rr7de
Күн бұрын
Very interesting. Also thanks for all the old tutorial vids. I'm a new player and they've been super helpful
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
Pleasure.
@JamieMays-e3q
Күн бұрын
anybody else afraid of Cap in charge of the military
@jimmaccauley
Күн бұрын
Nope. Well.... which military?
@Ozymandias-r2v
Күн бұрын
Looks suspiciously like Cyprus.
@seainobrien2261
Күн бұрын
Grim, would it be at all possible for you to redo the Ukraine Russian battle using what we know now about how shockingly bad and overrated Russian military equipment is? Also, knowing that at least 40% of Russian ordnance is either faulty or just not working , could this be modelled in DCS? Anyway, loving your work. Thanks
@LplusRatioLol
2 күн бұрын
@18:17 11 SAM batteries cost taiwan only 24 million? Sounds very wrong
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
Those are just the missiles fired. I didn't add cost to the actual sites.
@Hurricayne92
2 күн бұрын
A computer that could run this, probably even at full size, likely does exist it's just that it also lives at an NSA black site.
@lolmao500
2 күн бұрын
I wonder if the new game coming soon from Microprose, Sea Power : Naval Combat in the Missile Age, with a lot of mods could do realistic simulations... better than DCS??? Hmmm
@grimreapers
Күн бұрын
I am interested about this.
@ferrimusbueller
Күн бұрын
Cap: “Clickbait Dogfights” 😂😂
@SirJaxxSirJaxx
Күн бұрын
Hey Cap, another great sim considering the parameters in which you were restrained. Although I seriously doubt China could launch a sneak attack on Taiwan like this.
@jasonc5781
7 сағат бұрын
Little did capt know, "wing loong" is the name of an actual UAV (think "temu predator drone") sold by china (mainly to the middle east).
@mrstrommchannel
Күн бұрын
Cap, always appreciate the effort you and your team does to make these videos. I enjoyed the series and will keep watching.
@teresaharmon4405
Күн бұрын
Another great video Cap! Wish you well and a cure for your voice problem!
@OkijiMorsuq-zu8ct
2 күн бұрын
If a video Idea, could the LARSM be used as a quick sink bomb so the planes don't have to go in danger close
@hughmungus2760
Күн бұрын
I dont think LRASM can handle hitting the water and travelling under the surface. They'd just breakup on impact.
@leyvirose875
2 күн бұрын
@grimreapers... You're always saying stuff like "I have limited processing power on my PC", etc. What specs are you running? Is it _maybe_ time for an upgrade?
@grimreapers
23 сағат бұрын
AMD5900X 3080 yup will have to.
@Snowwie88
2 күн бұрын
Maybe it's time to upgrade to a serious server pc, with lots of CPU power and ram. Not the bog standard consumer pc, but a real server with 64 cores or something, with an AMD Threadripper and 192GB of ram or more. 🙂
@donbrown1361
Күн бұрын
Good job guys. Your explanations are on point. Your hard work to bring this forward is awesome❤
@usem_and_losem937
2 күн бұрын
What about anduril's new lrasm jr.'s, apparently, you can put their new missiles in the rapid dragon deployment with 200 mile range, but the bombs are just smaller. Look it up.
@everseeker
Күн бұрын
submerines really need to be modeled. The number of SM2s and their distribution would be seriously impacted by their launch platforms dodging and weaving thru ssm and torpedos
@occamraiser
Күн бұрын
youtube/google are demonetising with a level of enthusiasm that smacks of self-serving profiteering.
@jimmaccauley
Күн бұрын
Your comment has been demonetised as it breaches community profitability.
@thegreyhound1073
Күн бұрын
I think "JEFF" would be a much closer analog for the F-CK.
@Jack_Over9000
Күн бұрын
That's what I thought too.
@xpk0228
Күн бұрын
well F-CK does have lower weight than the JF-17 (6500 vs 8000kg) with the same level of thrust (both around 84KN). So it would probably break supersonic easier due to slightly better T/W ratio and less drag in general (see top speed M1.8 vs M1.6 for jeff)
@tedlasalvia9668
2 күн бұрын
Get a new powerful PC with at least a single 4090 :)
@schlix101
Күн бұрын
Truth be told though... Why would you send your own fighter fleet into an incoming Chinese fighter fleet if there are no incoming bombers who threaten your planes that are staying on the ground? Think about it... If you keep your fleet on the ground then the incoming fighters have no targets to shoot at and would be rendered virtually pointless. Unless there are also bombers who threaten your stationary fighters on the ground, just to take the bait. But, I of course also fully understand why your are doing it this way, which is for the fun of it...
@xpk0228
Күн бұрын
china does have bomber and strike aircraft with percision weapons. if we let them gain air superiority then they will start bombing superiority
@dony210
Күн бұрын
CVN 73, USS George Washington is replacing Ronnie.
Пікірлер: 374