now we need to see the fight between all the ejected pilots on the ground
@orpheus280
5 ай бұрын
Someone should set it up in ARMA. Regrouped teams of pilots with pistols fighting in a 100 square mile battlefield 😂
@jmjones7897
4 ай бұрын
USAF Pararescue 10/10 wrecks y'all
@spiderenigma2803
4 ай бұрын
@@orpheus280 the thing with America they drop with m4s lol
@StephenJohnson-jb7xe
3 ай бұрын
Bare knuckle fisticuffs.
@hypeflexington7081
Ай бұрын
Do they? Where does the m4 get stashed when ejecting?@@spiderenigma2803
@ArchAngel-FJB
5 ай бұрын
These battles should have some sort of AWACS protection. The AWACS, being the eyes in the sky for each side, would see the attackers coming for them and would immediately vector planes to intercept them or would at least have AA assets covering them. Both sides would know how important it is to keep these assets alive.
@jamieminnell7316
4 ай бұрын
its cool to see with russia having the starting advantage and having the awacs advantage they still got shat on
@killerblingxbl
4 ай бұрын
See, you say that, but Russia lost three (four?) AWACS to a country with barely any air force or AA.
@theendoftheline
4 ай бұрын
@@killerblingxbl maybe maintenance and training are important too? good catch ;)
@jamieminnell7316
4 ай бұрын
@@killerblingxbl no i was saying it was an unrealistic advantage that russia would have more awacs but it didnt matter cause they still got graped
@michaelmiller2200
3 ай бұрын
16 su57 combat ready 21 total
@robertwood9532
2 ай бұрын
I don't know why but I get a kick out of it when he calls us viewers. Makes me feel nostalgic I think.
@alanlueth1134
5 ай бұрын
Simba going after the AWACS immediately and exploiting the logic of the AI adds nothing to the scenario and only diminishes it. Adding some AA fire to protect the bases and/or AWACS would at least add a risk vs reward incentive to go after the strategic assets.
@Guildelin
4 ай бұрын
In a real battle you should bet your ass the awacs would be a priority target.
@Kumpelblase397
3 ай бұрын
@@GuildelinYeah, and they would dedicate Defenses to the Awacs...
@angel102ify
3 ай бұрын
@@Kumpelblase397 Ukraine says hello.
@Kumpelblase397
3 ай бұрын
@@angel102ify TBH, this was destroyed by Air Defence. And at the Edge of the Maximum Range of these. Nobody thought this was possible and the Russians thought they were safe.
@bzipoli
12 күн бұрын
awacs is literally what everyone will go first tho. previous battles (real battles) didn't had this because.... they didn't had AWACS? or at least ot wasn't so important. no major awacs presence in kosovo, no major presence in iraq, georgia, etc etc nowadays everyone will FOR SURE be going for it. and they should be heavily defended, in general. but doesn't mean they won't be engaged. same for AA. if you're talking about realism, why wouldn't the US just send a lot of tomahawks to overwhelm their SAMs and finish it? (not considering SEAD) you need to understand this is not great representation of reality 1:1. the military runs this on specific computers and even then, there are generals on both sides (teams) organizing the troops. this is just war-related fun for entertainment.
@RT-qd8yl
5 ай бұрын
I guess it would all depend on how much of their air force could actually start their engines and function, which is iffy.
@RazorsharpLT
5 ай бұрын
Have you SEEN the massive landwhale of a Russian pilot that ejected over Ukraine? And they make fun of Americans for being fat... lmao Not only are their aircraft inferior - their pilots are worse than most commercial pilots in the US
@5Andysalive
5 ай бұрын
I love that in Red Storm Rising Clancy constructs a reason the Soviets have half a year to get their military working before they start the war. It's nothing new apparently.
@subjectc7505
5 ай бұрын
They literally fly sortie daily into Ukraine 🤦🏾♂️
@Archer89201
5 ай бұрын
Well that goes to all the militaries in the world, half the brand new F-35s are down with maintainace issues according to the airforce due to reliability issues.
@subjectc7505
5 ай бұрын
@@Archer89201 right, not only that but logistics and if enough pilots are available. People love crapping on the VSK, when they're dominating Ukraine right now with glide bombs. Plus NATO just came out and debunked Ukraine analytics on their losses. Russia only lost 10% of their air force, aside from two A-50s and allegedly one Tu-22M, they're still going strong and just delivered a batch of new Su-35S's.
@TwoGamingDudesMovies
5 ай бұрын
Simba’s puzzy move of swinging around to take out the AWACS is so predictable, it’s becoming boring.
@jonathankenton7182
5 ай бұрын
It’s pu$$y not puzzy. I’m just messing with y’all. Hilarious comment.
@rat2244
5 ай бұрын
Definitely a sweaty nerd that takes his role too seriously
@AvrilToxic
5 ай бұрын
I reacted the same way Cap with the grass. First time I seen it myself, awesome stuff!
@ryanerickson8138
5 ай бұрын
Cap could use comms to redirect human fighters towards other human players who try to do the AWACS end around run.
@timothymckean2875
5 ай бұрын
You guys are awesome! My background is Infantry so I know little about piloting in a dogfight however I think by staggering the Americans it added a little game advantage to the Americans. Less aircraft to be killed by Russian missiles initially, as AI just shoots large number of missiles and end up wasting a lot of them. So I think the slow rate of Americans getting airborne was to their benefit.
@exAirMover
5 ай бұрын
When cap said "oww look at the grass being blown by the jet", I started imaging the smell of the burnt Avtur 😊
@aztec0112
5 ай бұрын
After reporting the spam bots, there aren't any comments.
@RT-qd8yl
5 ай бұрын
With as "advanced" as KZitem's algorithms etc are, you'd think they could figure out a way to just delete every account with an ass in the pfp. I call them ThotBots.
@bpop2148
5 ай бұрын
The state of KZitem in 2024...
@aztec0112
5 ай бұрын
@@bpop2148 Each video has more of them too. Was only 1-2 per, now it's up around ten so far on this video
@bpop2148
5 ай бұрын
@@aztec0112 It has for sure gotten a lot worse yea...
@RazorsharpLT
5 ай бұрын
@@bpop2148 It's mostly the state of "Mention anything NATO vs Russia" and you get plenty of Russian spambots.
@toddbrewer683
Ай бұрын
The overview is critical. Thanks boys. Another outstanding sim. Liked the description of the SU-34 as "Duckhead". I have always thought of them as a "Platypus".
@dylandarnell3657
5 ай бұрын
"Roughly as good as Chinese stealth, I would say" oof, talk about damned by faint praise
@grimreapers
5 ай бұрын
lols
@HowIsAsh
5 ай бұрын
@@grimreapers are you retarded or retarded
@Bababoy6969
5 ай бұрын
U do realise both China and Russia use American stealth tech when Yugoslavia shit down the f117 they gave parts to China and Russia which both modernized
@miriamweller812
5 ай бұрын
Stealth doesn't work against a real army. And no, targeting is no problem. When the air defense sees the aircraft, it's absolutely enough to guide the missile close to it, the missile will do the rest on sight, stealth doesn't help you anymore at this point.
@yomama629
4 ай бұрын
@@miriamweller812 if that were even remotely true then every country in the world with the means to do so wouldn't be pursuing stealth aircraft, and yet they are. You clearly know nothing
@intotheaether341
5 ай бұрын
The sound of this battle on those hills must have been terrifying
@paulhope3401
3 ай бұрын
As its a simulation, I can personally guarantee that no one died or shart themselves.
@kristiansandsmark2048
5 ай бұрын
In Scandinavia we are merging our air force response. Was wondering if you would like to do a simulation where Norway, Denmark, Finland and Sweden fighting against the russian arsenal?
@rustysutton
4 ай бұрын
just imagine a big flash and a huge mushroom cloud there you go
@extraordinarytv5451
5 ай бұрын
There are so many F-16s that it would be hard for the Russians not to get overwhelmed. Imagine if had been the F-35 fleet (including exported and sold ones there have been over 1,000 made, yikes!)
@subjectc7505
5 ай бұрын
Russia wouldn't get overwhelmed.
@knight1706
5 ай бұрын
@@subjectc7505Yeah, the hundreds of 5th gens launching fox-2’s disagree’s with ya’.
@subjectc7505
5 ай бұрын
@@knight1706 Keep dreaming broski. It can only happen in video games.
@dgthe3
5 ай бұрын
@@subjectc7505 Oh do tell us how the mighty Russian airforce could not be overwhelmed by a 3:2 numerical disadvantage against an air fleet comprised entirely of stealth aircraft. This'll be good to hear.
@subjectc7505
5 ай бұрын
@@dgthe3 only in video games would that happen. Russians always operate within their defense radius and as you can see in Ukraine, neither side is unable to takeoff without their RWR beaming from a track radar. It's not the middle east broski. You'll push back the Russians but overwhelm is an understatement.
@SolNacht
5 ай бұрын
That was a good scrap, far more entertaining than Gen 5 vs Gen 3 or 4.
@layneanderson9582
5 ай бұрын
Also thought the F-16's could have a hard point with a split Aim-9 missles to have 2 sidewinders on a hard point. times 2 for each wing and we could have 4 missles instead of 2.
@Slipknotyk06
5 ай бұрын
Does DCS have a way to replicate the F18 Growler? That would be a fun mission to see if you can make SAM sites fire at nonexistent targets.
@sgs521
5 ай бұрын
I get F-35's, F-18's, and F-16's over my house mostly. But I'm about 2 and a half miles north of Lockheed and a joint reserve base. It'd be nice to see an F-15 or something else once in a while. Occasionally a raptor is seen but rare these days.
@QuantumS1ngularity
4 ай бұрын
Why i can't find the previous video with entire US air force vs entire Russian air force?
@johnwycough1955
5 ай бұрын
Good watch!!
@sarttee
4 ай бұрын
not likely f-16s could take on mig 29 and su-27s but the 0 su 35s would be a issue
@davewebster5120
5 ай бұрын
I would call the F-16 the most successful fighter jet of all time. It does everything cheaper than everything else. It's a damn shame the F-16XL never picked up traction. Those delta wings would have pushed it to a new level.
@drew004jc
3 ай бұрын
and all the maintainers went out and had a beer while awaiting parts
@petermayer8977
3 ай бұрын
I feel like you really missed an opportunity to play the Team America theme as the F16s were taxiing out
@MrCastodian
5 ай бұрын
F-16 C/D do not use AESA radars, they have APG-68 (V)10 Pulse Doppler radar, US F-16 in real life is old, obsolete and have no AESA.. They are all inferior in all parameters against SU-30, SU-34, SU-35, SU-57 and Mig-31. In all versions of this fight Russian fighter would get the first shot fired and lots of first kills. Mig-31 would be a monster against F-16 when they could rise to max altitude and send all of their missiles against F-16 before they are detected and F-16 would have problem to intercept them on that high altitude before they gain max altitude themself. SU-57 would kill all AWACS before all this started, return home, rearm and killing more, and no, SU-57 is not super stealthy, it’s not, just that F-16 radars are obsolete. F-16 detected all Russians fighters way way and way to early, half of them would be shoot down before releasing a missile. The entire fight was made in a way to give USA an edge and removing all Russian edges in the form of long ranged missiles, altitude and radars.
@THESocialJusticeWarrior
3 ай бұрын
Chaff and flairs are worthless? Didn't seem to help.
@Krhys1
5 ай бұрын
Looks like a vast amount of the initial Russian missiles were launched against very few F-16s in the chokepoint.
@clangerbasher
5 ай бұрын
More proof that the F-16XL is the greatest plane 'we' never had.
@totalNERD-eo7wx
5 ай бұрын
Aaand that is the best plane we never had because we had the option of having the F-15E instead
@beardoe6874
3 ай бұрын
There are two less SU57 now...
@mrlodwick
5 ай бұрын
Thank you chaps.
@semperfidelis271
3 ай бұрын
a fair fight is nice in a game but a massive mistake in war
@t.r.4496
5 ай бұрын
I would like to see this same mission ran with F-15s
@TheGobin
5 ай бұрын
f15's would do better than the f16's until they run out of missiles
@grimreapers
5 ай бұрын
US only has about 400 F-15s so they'd get smashed :(
@AnExtrovertPaints
5 ай бұрын
That's... not how statistics works. 'Roughly even' kills, but that's 4/5 of one force compared to 1/3 of the other force--that's a massive difference. Russia launched a lot more weapons and downed similar numbers to the Americans and meanwhile most of the RU forces down vs a sizeable amount of Americans left. That's a one-sided battle, my boys.
@toyrunner87
5 ай бұрын
Could you do the mission from Iron Eagle in memory of Louis Gossett Jr?
@j4s0n39
5 ай бұрын
33:32 Was Dark flying around with his gear down?
@sgs521
5 ай бұрын
Definitely looked like it was down. Maybe he dropped them to try to slow/ pull a last ditch evasion?
@arakuss1
5 ай бұрын
Since the AI is stupid about protecting the AWACS human players should not be allowed to target them. The purpose of this simulation is suppose to be, at least I thought, was to see if the F-16s could take out the whole Russian air force or not. It was not hey lets have a human player take out the AWACS which are not guarded and won't be by the AIs
@gibbousmoon35
5 ай бұрын
Possibly the most valuable thing a human could do would be to fly CAP for the AWACS
@BryKKan1
4 ай бұрын
There's a problem with your setup here, which should actually make the F-16 missile much more impactful. You excluded the bombers, and planes that aren't "front-line capable". In reality, such planes would be intended to launch at the same time, and come through to destroy the F16 airbases and/or other HVTs, while they're busy engaging the fighters. You would end up having to engage them as well, possibly even in priority over fighters in some cases.
@oso1165
5 ай бұрын
Simba ruining it as per usual
@Mikey-vn4ye
3 ай бұрын
Poor taxpayer, they are down by 8 billion $$$
@INTJRECLUSE
4 ай бұрын
So the point of this unrealistic simulation is that if Russia had every possible advantage and all of their aircraft actually were operable and russia actually had that many operable A2A missiles, they would still lose?
@tgsgardenmaintenance4627
5 ай бұрын
Doesn't the MiG-31 have gatling gun??
@matsv201
5 ай бұрын
Where do i find the Russian airforce vs modern US aircrafts?
@SkyGlitchGalaxy
4 ай бұрын
If it can't, the simulation is completely broken. 😂
@michaelmiller2200
3 ай бұрын
1100 r-77m vs 1400 aim -120d3 Isn't even dumb
@wandameadows5736
5 ай бұрын
Your extremely naive thinking Wiki isn't biased.
@trentvlak
5 ай бұрын
It's been a slog trying to post a comment while dodging the nanny ai that won't let them through.
@leepatterson5710
5 ай бұрын
I would like to see a version of this with a French-led coalition (Poland, Baltic states, Nordic countries) against Russia as the French are pursuing confrontation with Russia as a matter of national policy (you can read their 2023/2024 public documents).
@Nightwatch-et9hb
3 ай бұрын
Here's a thought for you. You've had America v China v Russia. You've had U.K doing the same. Why don't you try Russia V China? There should also be room for Russia v Japan.
@jakobholgersson4400
5 ай бұрын
Could you see if Russia could beat the Swedish Air Force right now? That means using only the aircraft that neither are tied up in Ukraine or the aircraft they need for territorial defense.
@PanaGringoBarefootBass
5 ай бұрын
How about trying this with first just the 1978 USN F-4's VS USSR inventory and then just 2001 USN F-18's VS Russia.
@Driveby-Viktum
5 ай бұрын
Stop screwing with the computer outputs by using a human to emasculate the opposing force. (AWAC end run is implausible and would not happen in a 4th gen). if you have Humans in these large scale mainly COMPUTER simulations, make the AWACS off limits.
@AELINIC
4 ай бұрын
the russians would have won if they had only the R77 and not the 27, so unfair lmao
@SmithandWesson22A
5 ай бұрын
Where is Violet?
@blainesitter9110
Ай бұрын
Lol , next try the F4 or the AV 8B . until US lose . isn't that the game you play ?
@rogerrolex6981
4 ай бұрын
They could be easily destroyed by some reversed, engineered alien airships with magnetic pulse weapons😂😂😂
@donaldstark373
5 ай бұрын
Which Wiki page did you use to total up these fleets? The numbers aren't consistent with en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_military_aircraft
@nonombre7159
4 ай бұрын
Im gonna say probably.
@kidongput3342
5 ай бұрын
Your videos are biased so much that it never fails to to amaze me
@ShroomFreak
5 ай бұрын
Not a " Fucking " chance !!
@WolvesValleyFarm
5 ай бұрын
Lol. Wiki not being biased for or against anyone. That's a joke right?
@bikedoc4145
3 ай бұрын
Russia should take this to heart because it would be way worse for them in real life 🤣
@walkaz
5 ай бұрын
No Saved you 20mins
@ImWithTeamTrinity
5 ай бұрын
The Americans lost almost double the value in hardware for just a few extra kills, it may seem like a win but I suspect the accountants would disagree.
@gibbousmoon35
5 ай бұрын
They're home-grown product on both sides, so to fully evaluate that you would need to adjust for relative spending power. Maybe monetary loss adjusted for relative GDP?
@STURYANPHUAYEWLIANG
5 ай бұрын
I mean the thing is the US does not solely have F-16s, so real losses will be much much lower
@markscion
5 ай бұрын
As ww3 breaks out, Cap watches grass waving, probably been smoking it 😜
@akiali2632
3 ай бұрын
So America gets 'punched' up missile numbers while russia's r 'punched' down? 😅😅
@Andres66Cali
5 ай бұрын
Gr8 Fun Kids!
@phillip13fox
5 ай бұрын
I will never understand why you make anyones PILOTS equal in skill to US airmen... NO OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD puts as much training and flight time into their pilots as the US nor do they have nearly the amount of ACTUAL COMBAT TIME. If you look at it..
@RomanianReaver
4 ай бұрын
Nice premise. Nothing in US air force inventory can counter the Mig-31BM.
@Dimitris_Datseris
5 ай бұрын
Please guys don’t say “ first”
@qlf91s62
5 ай бұрын
First
@fulcrum2951
5 ай бұрын
Second
@Dimitris_Datseris
5 ай бұрын
@@qlf91s62 good one 😂
@Nealetony
5 ай бұрын
Firstest
@dragondude6984
5 ай бұрын
Third
@smokeyjoe1034
5 ай бұрын
Could the entire Russian Air Force be defeated by just the US F-16 fleet? No, it can't.
@janofdelft
5 ай бұрын
Been concerned about your frequent illnesses - do get seen to, please.
@lukasprentow8990
4 ай бұрын
No
@nityoditchoudhary7904
4 ай бұрын
Bro Pak f16 lost to Indian mig 21 so.....
@Laerei
5 ай бұрын
Next time put F-22 escorts on the AWACS just to spite Simba xD
@grimreapers
5 ай бұрын
lols
@Vapor0040
5 ай бұрын
I support Simba spite, how did he not fly an F-16 in this mission? LOL
@5Andysalive
5 ай бұрын
@@Vapor0040 took one for the (small) team?
@maksymsliazin4742
4 ай бұрын
This battle doesn't count. You didn't include SU-47
@ausinasmith96
4 ай бұрын
@@maksymsliazin4742pfffffft
@exidy-yt
5 ай бұрын
How ironic that the first Russian plane killed in a massive 4th gen vs 4th gen furball was the ONLY 5th gen stealth fighter in the battle!
@ivorharden
5 ай бұрын
It makes you wonder about the "stealth" aircraft
@kuunoooo7293
5 ай бұрын
It really are the engines, when it gets its real engines is extreemly stealthy @@ivorharden
@ivorharden
5 ай бұрын
@@kuunoooo7293 what are the real engines?
@Laerei
5 ай бұрын
@@kuunoooo7293 Right.
@140theguy
5 ай бұрын
@@ivorhardenMakes you wonder about Russian stealth. The US's stealth actually works.
@theiceman447
5 ай бұрын
I really wish you would give the awacs escorts because it seems that nobody pays any attention to them once the game starts and your missiles don't work as well without them
@MiklaDfar
5 ай бұрын
The end around on the AWACs is not realistic as the AWAC would vector fighters to intercept.
@rnash999
5 ай бұрын
It is ridiculous too as this is a can X beat all Y and not can a non command and control fleet beat them and so on. Of course the side without AWACS is crippled and will be worse off.
@mattgangel1
5 ай бұрын
And he does it every time. Super annoying
@andrewtv9873
5 ай бұрын
Agree. Silly and not in the spirit of the event. Stopped watching the moment the second one went down.
@gunner-qf9eh
5 ай бұрын
@@mattgangel1 So if you know he does it EVERY TIME like you claim, why are you still here clicking, viewing, commenting, which directly supports the channel, regardless if your analysis is positive or negative?
@killingyouwithlogic5808
5 ай бұрын
@@rnash999 I agree 100% Its like what they do to the F-22's at Red Flag events they put them in damn near impossible mismatchs and give them limits to use and then when 1 is taken out the world acts like the f-22 is now crap! Its Truly useless to judge based on a senerio where one sides has there hands tied tells us nothing!
@rat2244
5 ай бұрын
Someone remind Simba that he doesn't sound as cool as he thinks he does
@BeasantN
3 ай бұрын
So the main 4th gen a-a fighter is the F-15. The F-16 is a multi role Aircraft and so not the best they have as 4th gen. What about other 4th gens being in there like the F-14 and the F-18. I_f you're going to do everything on the FSR side it'd only be fair to use all the US fighters. Otherwise it's disingenuous. I forgot to add. The FSR air force is well under trained as compared to the USAF and They have way less combat experience and exercise experience than the USAF so if they are set ans anything other than rookies then again very disingenuous. Also with all the FSR corruption the paper FSR air force isn't the same a combat ready air force. It will be well less than on paper. This has been proven in Ukraine, where they regularly hit the wrong targets.
@xXE4GLEyEXx
5 ай бұрын
I love these videos! Also just wanna say thank you for keeping the spark going... recently the F-4 preorder stuff arrived which prompted me to redownload DCS, then one thing followed an other and I am playing through a gazillion of my dust collecting modules and using your videos to re learn the startups and systems... and now added VR on top of the mix... yeah I am lost to the simulator xD And the F-4 is not even here yet. Just wanna say thank you for the content and the inspiration to fly more :D
@grimreapers
5 ай бұрын
Pleasure
@russellfisher2853
3 ай бұрын
Simba should be on the American side. Is their even 10 57's that will fly? I think an even start, and the same number of bases, would have made a huge difference. No American going after Russian AWAC's I think Simba is already feeling himself, with the easy kills, you really probably don't need to help him, with missile amouts, and distance to him. Lol
@jasonvick55
5 ай бұрын
If we’re using futuristic missiles then shouldn’t the U.S. be able to use the AIM-260, due to it becoming operational in 2024, and being two stage like the R-77M; which like you said, is also futuristic. Any thoughts by anyone?
@RazorsharpLT
5 ай бұрын
Honestly the US would win, and that would be boring. They have to handicap themselves to give Russia a chance. Let's say - they don't want any of the new, future missiles to land in Russia to give them an edge.
@grimreapers
5 ай бұрын
They didn't really need it TBH.
@jasonvick55
5 ай бұрын
@@grimreapers very true. Thanks Cap!
@jasonvick55
5 ай бұрын
@@RazorsharpLT makes sense. It would most likely be a slaughter. Lol
@chrisstopher2277
5 ай бұрын
I'm not sure how long I've been subbed to your channel but it's pretty amazing you've put out a video everyday I've been subscribed and it's been multiple years. I think a couple years before covid. My brain is faulty though so I could be off by 5 years.
@zacharywilson7146
5 ай бұрын
35:11 "Foxes are in the hen house, now!" Funny because the Soviets actually had an OTH Radar with the NATO Reporting Name "HEN HOUSE"
@AllTradesGeorge
5 ай бұрын
I wonder how much of the swing in numbers was due to the slower launch rate of the F-16s. It would also explain the lower number of American missiles fired, and it wouldn't be the first time one of these battles ended up being won by the slower-launching force still having offensive capabilities after the faster force had burned through their armaments in an initial surge.
@Zargabaath
3 ай бұрын
This guy always manages to fuck up the most simple shit when setting up a simulation. Give the Americans 2 less airfields and no carriers. By the time the Americans had 3ish planes in the sky the Russians already had like 30+.
@JLH111176
5 ай бұрын
if only I could have got to AWACS sooner must be a reason they hide in the back like that so that can't happen
@hf117j
5 ай бұрын
Yup. They're a long range radar. Far as I know they aren't armed
@ivorharden
5 ай бұрын
Are you Simba?
@JLH111176
5 ай бұрын
@@ivorharden no
@TheClanAdventures
5 ай бұрын
Wiki not biased. are you interested in buying a bridge. could do you a good deal.
@zezoo2107
5 ай бұрын
Next video Growling Sidewinder vs Grim Reaper
@LukeBunyip
5 ай бұрын
I'm only here for the rewenge
@AxlePlaysGames
5 ай бұрын
I’m sure Grump is missing the F-16 action
@matsv201
5 ай бұрын
what this really show is how incredibly superior human players is (well skilled human players). And that can probobly be extended to good or bad trained real fighter pilots
@yejdjek3320
4 ай бұрын
LOTS OF RAGING RUSSIANS INCOMING
@nich7622
15 күн бұрын
You'd rather say laughing russians? This one-sided conveniently winning cartoon deserves nothing but good laugh.
@dylandarnell3657
5 ай бұрын
When did you do the "USAF vs Russian Air Force" fight referenced in the beginning? I'm not seeing that in your recent videos.
@jasontoney9886
4 ай бұрын
The F16 holds a 92:13 kill/loss ratio, stated by UN Military Command......But It is undoubtedly a game changer for undeveloped countries...sure ...will it defeat the RAUF ...Hell no its holds a great kill Ratio ...but when you look deeper, its only vs sub 1999 and prior enemies ...VS +1999 equipped enemies it touts a abysmal 12:28 kill/Loss ratio
@crashcrain
5 ай бұрын
Sims are as one sided as the program writer, they leave out the human elements, also ground anti-air. If I was flying a F-16 into Ukraine airspace or Russia I would be keeping it at tree top and hunting upwards, deliver payload and return to the deck returning to base. You simply cannot give radar a long enough window to acquire and this can only be achieved by flying low and fast.
@Musix4me-Clarinet
5 ай бұрын
Man. I wish you could feel better. I hate that you can't break free of this, Cap.
@gibbousmoon35
5 ай бұрын
LOL I'm guessing you mean hope, not hate
@Musix4me-Clarinet
5 ай бұрын
@@gibbousmoon35 Oh my. Thanks. I adjusted it.
@edwardmyers8782
3 ай бұрын
How fucking ng far do you think you could go mach 1.8 before running out of fuel and awacs always have sentry aircraft.
@nomikomaryu5049
4 ай бұрын
I want to say the reason it stayed even was the fact that the Russians were wheels up before the F-16's at least thats what it seems. If i'm correct in that it might've given the Russians a better chance at the starts when it was a few F-16's vs the majority of the Russian Air-Force (relatively) giving an initial Russian advantage (even though the Su-57 already did give a slight advantage which was showed by the the 57 immediately getting a couple of kills before being locked on). Then as the F-16's starts to gain traction in the fight enough to let other F-16's up in the air which also allowed the F-16's an advantage of still having munitions in comparison to the already winchester and retreating Russians. I will say i loved seeing the extremely slimey and slippery evasion that the F-16's were able to do (dodging at one point 4-5 missiles at once and still surviving) and it kind of proves why its one of the best aircrafts in the world. I would love to see the same thing however with the F-15's to see how kuch of a difference if at all it would be for the F-15 to F-16 and actually compare to who is truly better in air superiority
Пікірлер: 695