Ukraine-Russia Series: Air-Launched SM-6 vs Moscow: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2Gxrz5udiYZ4ipw Ukraine F-16s vs Kerch Bridge: kzitem.info/news/bejne/s4-Pp2Ssr6KWZ4o ATACMS Missile vs Russian Bases: kzitem.info/news/bejne/136N3XVqgqqUi4I Ukr Hits S-400 & Sevastopol: kzitem.info/news/bejne/062iq5dvqZN7daw F-16s vs Russian Cruise Missiles: kzitem.info/news/bejne/o4Zp0ZprqIGWrXo F-16s vs Odessa Blockade: kzitem.info/news/bejne/t4Ro1YmrrZuonqw A-10 Clear Minefields: kzitem.info/news/bejne/op6Z1Iyfg5aEZH4 US-Supplied Cluster Bombs: kzitem.info/news/bejne/uGqXuJpvpWeneoY F/A-18 Hornet vs Su-35: kzitem.info/news/bejne/z4io04lnrqJzpKA F-16A MLU vs Su-35: kzitem.info/news/bejne/p36utoGwbn-Zl34 Patriot vs KH-47M" Kinzhal: kzitem.info/news/bejne/pGOnl6iNpX6ZY34 Eurofighter vs Su-57: kzitem.info/news/bejne/sKSB24psa2dqlqA Rapid Dragon 2 vs Black Sea Fleet: kzitem.info/news/bejne/1H6KrX99apWKmJg MALD, Storm Shadow & AARGM-ER: kzitem.info/news/bejne/xWymlo2PmIiCjY4 Storm Shadow vs Russian SAMs: kzitem.info/news/bejne/lq2AtpZ4epxhioI Iskander vs Various SAMS: kzitem.info/news/bejne/rK6ux5yFi4F1dXY HIMARS vs Russian SHORADs: kzitem.info/news/bejne/pX9s332qaZmgg3Y Storm Shadow vs Kerch Bridge: kzitem.info/news/bejne/tql-x218nmRqmn4 Rapid Dragon vs Black Sea Fleet: kzitem.info/news/bejne/06yLuqBssZyppI4 Ukraine With JDAM-ER: kzitem.info/news/bejne/xZuN1IJnbGNqi6w UK Typhoons vs Su-57: kzitem.info/news/bejne/sKSB24psa2dqlqA F-22 Raptors vs Russia President: kzitem.info/news/bejne/p5mj2mahnZeTqX4 Air Force One vs Russia: kzitem.info/news/bejne/qnqMu4CKsqyUeKw AGM-179 JAGM vs 2S38 & T-90: kzitem.info/news/bejne/l2OcnnuAs6qYaHo SEAD & ATACMS vs Kerch Bridge: kzitem.info/news/bejne/qYBms5utkauVrI4 IMP US Strike vs Black Sea Fleet: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2YmLp52Kj6l6aaQ HIMARS ATACMS vs Kerch Bridge: kzitem.info/news/bejne/1ouVuYSgaXqCmqQ Sa-11 Buk Firing Sea Sparrow: kzitem.info/news/bejne/1nil2K2re3qXdYY US Strike vs Black Sea Fleet: kzitem.info/news/bejne/rIOtv56AoJqCnHY Rus SEAD vs Modernized Patriot: kzitem.info/news/bejne/p5ql35qBoJOAgXo Rus Bombers vs Modernized Patriot: kzitem.info/news/bejne/lY9vnGWqhYB2ZG0 JDAM vs S-400 Network: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2IZq2Zp6gF9hZHo Kinzhal vs Pac-3 & IRIS-T: kzitem.info/news/bejne/ymZ94JaXo3thoIo F16 or Gripen for Ukraine?: kzitem.info/news/bejne/umOhnWWkn5OhZ4Y Mig-31 vs NATO Black Sea AWACS: kzitem.info/news/bejne/13yF4J6Na2d6p34 R-37M Long Range Shootdown: kzitem.info/news/bejne/jmmCsXuCbalqhGk Drone Swarm vs NATO Defense: kzitem.info/news/bejne/2Hp4tYeacqN0d6g Patrio PAC-3/IRIS-T vs Missiles: kzitem.info/news/bejne/r2uQnmWfkGqKgY4 MANPAD/IRIS-T vs Russian Missiles: kzitem.info/news/bejne/r2-In3uLj5WFrKA AGM-158C LRASM vs Sevastopol: kzitem.info/news/bejne/qHqQ1XiIoXt6haw A-10s Operating in S-400 Nets: kzitem.info/news/bejne/lnitrKCbrJllZaQ Modernized Su-27 vs Su-35: kzitem.info/news/bejne/mKKisniwnoZjdag Modernized F15/F16 vs Su-35: kzitem.info/news/bejne/joql4Ih-m3OJiag Can Su-57 Defend Russia From F-22/35: kzitem.info/news/bejne/pmOlqWeEoKp0bGk IMPROVED Stealth vs Russian Bombers: kzitem.info/news/bejne/qp2tsotqkn2niYo Ukraine Using Hellfire Missile?: kzitem.info/news/bejne/1JVnv3x6jZ-Bg6w US Harpoons vs Russian Navy: kzitem.info/news/bejne/sJ-by2xpfImDlno Ukraine Using APKWS?: kzitem.info/news/bejne/p3iuvG2PrnOXlKw Ukraine US HARMs vs Russian S-400: kzitem.info/news/bejne/xomvq4OOrJyIom0 Patriot/NASAMS vs Supersonic Missiles: kzitem.info/news/bejne/ymennal6npufdGk Fulcrum/Flanker vs Foxbat/Super Flanker: kzitem.info/news/bejne/o56OzKyZcmZ7dIo NASAMS vs Russian Cruise Missiles: kzitem.info/news/bejne/0YB_xZZvbpyro6A Russian KH-47M2 vs Polish Air Force: kzitem.info/news/bejne/xKSovKynhWeibKw Su-27 & Drone vs Snake Island: kzitem.info/news/bejne/tZWluKOLa3OqmaQ Su-25s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: kzitem.info/news/bejne/06-MnGmYjnyrpaw NATO Eurofighters vs Crimean AWACS: kzitem.info/news/bejne/pp-AmJh8i5pqaJw Patriot, Gepard & Gripen vs KH-65: kzitem.info/news/bejne/u56uyqaEo5uYZJw A-10s vs Russian Convoy At Kyiv: kzitem.info/news/bejne/o2aqwKOlaad9m2k USN Tomahawk Strike Kerch Bridge: kzitem.info/news/bejne/kaymz2yue6uYiW0 USAF Stealth Strike Kerch Bridge: kzitem.info/news/bejne/qoCYzG14nKqfqmU Ukrainian Jets Strike Kerch Bridge: kzitem.info/news/bejne/qm5826Grk4SWdWk F-22 Raptors vs Russian Fighters: kzitem.info/news/bejne/pKWjuJejq6l7iqA Raptor/Eagle vs Super Flanker: kzitem.info/news/bejne/zJunv6GrjHegYG0 USAF Bombers vs Mariupol Defenses: kzitem.info/news/bejne/wnmpyKOFgGKCiGk Ukraine Bombs Snake Island: kzitem.info/news/bejne/o45sn2qDhJaclW0 Stealth Fighters vs Russian Bombers: kzitem.info/news/bejne/06-jn2Sgp4N1pnY Sinking Of Moskva #3: kzitem.info/news/bejne/r3-g1a1_opeArY4 Sinking Of Moskva #2: kzitem.info/news/bejne/1KSgzJagmHeoimk Sinking Of Moskva #1: kzitem.info/news/bejne/o66tzmqDgH57gZg Russia Nukes Britain: kzitem.info/news/bejne/07ChmmmIf4OodG0 Ukraine Uses Danish F-16s: kzitem.info/news/bejne/km2Gz5-oqWKClI4 Ukraine Uses Polish Mig-29s: kzitem.info/news/bejne/23mfmqh3gqymgoo Russian-Britain Missile Attack: kzitem.info/news/bejne/261_rZqXm6ire3Y Ghost Of Kyiv: kzitem.info/news/bejne/uqiZ2myMbaBiYIo Belgorod Raid: kzitem.info/news/bejne/zoev0YiurWiXp6w Eurofighter/Fulcrum vs Super Flanker: kzitem.info/news/bejne/roavr52mfpqYhWU US Strike vs Odessa kzitem.info/news/bejne/rJuftXyds5uUaY4 Russian Helo Rocket Lob: kzitem.info/news/bejne/kmdurZt9p4KQpoI Russian Su-25 vs US Patriot SAM: kzitem.info/news/bejne/wqmmnG2QfZGlgmU Understanding Russian SAMs: kzitem.info/news/bejne/s2quuqyCh4yJlqw Ukrainian Jets Road Operations: kzitem.info/news/bejne/yXim4IWeoqCBlaw Russian 40 Mile Convoy: kzitem.info/news/bejne/t6iVk2Z8hZSddaA Flanker vs Super Flanker: kzitem.info/news/bejne/t4V324N8hXx4nmk
@eatshitpitt1990
7 ай бұрын
Saw a clip from one of yalls videos on task and purpose. Was pretty awesome lol 👍👍👍
@grimreapers
7 ай бұрын
That's pretty cool!
@christophero55
7 ай бұрын
Link please.
@smileygladhands
6 ай бұрын
That dude is pretty cool and knowledgeable.
@spinmaster4348
7 ай бұрын
8:43 The maximum speed of SM-6 has never been said to be mach4, calculated using simple rocket equation and the propellant mass of mk104 and mk72 motor the maximum speed of sm6 is easily over mach6 even when launched from sea level. Wikipedia is always the last thing to use as a reference when it comes to military stuff.
@willwozniak2826
7 ай бұрын
Mach 3.5
@phoenixrising4073
7 ай бұрын
@willwozniak2826 shutup and go back to your cubicle.
@apolloaero
7 ай бұрын
What equation do you use? I'm genuinely curious, and how accurate is it?
@willwozniak2826
7 ай бұрын
@@apolloaero the US Navy has specifications in it....the manufacture Raytheon RX has some of the specifications....well how fast is 1.03 km/s? I stink at math....😫
@amizaur3marcinostrowski186
7 ай бұрын
The SM-6 missile does not have to use all it's fuel for boost-only, so for reaching max possible speed. The SM-2/SM-3 airframe most probably has restrictions that not allow it a hypersonic flight (think of things like melting the nosecones and fins, exceeding temperature limits for airframe and so on). Most likely it boosts to about Mach 3.5-4 and uses the remaining fuel either for sustaining thrust or for a second impulse after some time - in the interception phase or just to extend the range. Maybe the massive booster propels it to designed cruise speed and the whole main missile rocket engine is configured for long sustain, or a multiple impulse work. For an air launch most likely the booster would not be used, only the main missile body and engine. 22:19 22:20 22:21
@dougroberts3840
7 ай бұрын
Dark's not the only one here from Michigan, I'm also from Michigan, born and raised and still living here....Woo Hoo Dark.
@christophero55
7 ай бұрын
10:08 really interesting insight into the making of these videos/the idiosyncrasies of working with DCS to make these complex scenarios. I think it is as much an insight into Cap's personality as it is into how the videos are made though. He often mentions hours of work trying to get various things to run correctly. I have a hunch that this is as much about Cap's brain fixating on understanding the problem as it is about finding a solution. In this example he eventually just has the flight of F-16's despawn and a new one spawn in. He could have implemented this pretty quickly but he spent three hours trying to figure out WHY the F-16's kept blowing themselves up before doing it. A stubborn curiosity. Like most personality traits it can be either advantageous or disadvantageous depending on the circumstances. Cap's (and others who have this trait) stubborn drive to understand could lead him to keep working on something when others would have quit, leading him to solutions (maybe better solutions) others never would have attained. On the other hand he might also be inefficient, spending far to much time trying to figure out why something isn't working when he doesn't need to or where there isn't much hope of finding an answer anyway. The beauty of this type of variation in human traits is that a community might have both types of people working on a problem- one that will solve it quick and get things running again, and another who will keep working until the problem is thoroughly understood and can implement an even better solution down the road. This is one of the things that make humans so adaptable and successful as a species. We have very complex variation in how we think and this means that more often than not we have a person/persons especially suited to take on any problem that arises.
@gundamator4709
7 ай бұрын
It would be very interesting to see this VS the PL-17 in air to air. When launched from 30k feet at mach 1 I think it would get a huge boost in range.
@mattt525
7 ай бұрын
Hey Cap! I have a video idea for you. I love the videos when your humans don't know the entire situation. So I was thinking of you giving a group of humans a certain objective and having them decide what assests they want to use. And you as the other side. They will have access to small amounts of intelligence and have to use that to build an attack around that. Hope that makes sense cheers Cap! Also thank you for the videos I hope someday I will get a DCS set-up and maybe get to play with y'all someday!
@bzipoli
6 ай бұрын
i think this might be more feasible now with the Olympus mod. it would be a great video (i believe they're doing something kinda like this, but figuring out how)
@ivorharden
7 ай бұрын
Fantastic video yet again. I love this channel.
@brianwittrupjensen5188
7 ай бұрын
love the content Cap. 🙂
@El__Leche
7 ай бұрын
hey cap! really cool video! thanks for all the effort you put into these. I have a battle suggestion: With trouble brewing in Venezuela, would be really cool to see a battle between Venezuela's Su-30's vs Brazil's Gripens
@Ricqu
7 ай бұрын
I was away for a long time, but hearing your cheerful tone voice on these videos calms me down.
@trev8591
7 ай бұрын
Just seen GR got a credit in "Task & Purpose" for your JDAM work!
@MattWaller04
7 ай бұрын
That’s awesome!
@colinboneham7387
7 ай бұрын
I’d love you try the same mission with the F15EX & then with the F35 too see which one can get the job done
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
Ukraine will never get F15s or F35s
@user-sq6is6xc4k
7 ай бұрын
I live in Michigan too Dark----Love watching all of the fun stuff y'all do.
@flyjym2276
7 ай бұрын
If it’s Moscow that’s being attacked, I’d have assumed pantsir and s350 sites would have also been integrated as well into their defense?!
@92HazelMocha
7 ай бұрын
They do.
@miriamweller812
7 ай бұрын
Obviously. Also: you don't want to see the answer...
@bzipoli
6 ай бұрын
please consider all as entertainment purposes, not it's "military accurate" because not even DCS itself is. point is to have fun within a scenario "based in reality"
@XTXImperator
7 ай бұрын
I think you got the whole approach to this the wrong way. If you are going to emulate an Ukrainian version of a Kinzhal strike, you should go the whole way. Use MiG-25's and convert them to fire ATACMS like SU-24's are firing Storm Shadows/SCALP's. The MiG-29's/F-16's can fire the SM-6's as decoys since the MALD's that you are using are just simply too slow.
@billisaacs702
7 ай бұрын
Well you at least proved the concept of launching those darts by air. Nicely done. Next, I wonder if you would do a similar mission but with F35 support for SEAD? I bet that would get through.
@darrencorrigan8505
7 ай бұрын
Thanks, Grim Reapers.
@jmtpolitico80
7 ай бұрын
Cool Mission!
@ediko77
7 ай бұрын
Interesting mission! super!!!
@up4open
7 ай бұрын
Same mission with Paveway via drone targeting to enemy runway, to chainsaw into HARm or RTB into HARM to SM-6 with fighter screen till extract. I thought it was interesting that the Russian Data Link apparently was allowing SAM to fire without local ground radar suggesting use of Cluster.
@corvanphoenix
7 ай бұрын
Cap flying so close to that bot was freaking me out.
@jsublett8871
7 ай бұрын
This was cool. I'm still waiting for you to do my request of doing a mission from the end of the iron eagle movie 😆. I know it takes a while to set these things up but it will be really cool if you get a chance to do it.
@lukethompson3672
7 ай бұрын
kzitem.info/news/bejne/t2tunKqHp594hpg
@Zachattack-ot2un
7 ай бұрын
Please do air launched SM-6 on the B-1R
@grimreapers
7 ай бұрын
It doesn't fit, I believe the bays are too short, same with F-35 bays.
@EagleFighterJet
7 ай бұрын
good video
@MrNakedweasel
7 ай бұрын
I have long wanted you to do an air-launched SM-6 video. But I'd like to see you use it with a modern us navy airwing, versus a near peer rival, against their aircraft and ships.
@92HazelMocha
7 ай бұрын
Sm6 is a blast frag warhead, it won't do any serious damage to any sizable naval vessel.
@gundamator4709
7 ай бұрын
@@92HazelMochatake out the radars and put the vessel out of action.
@92HazelMocha
7 ай бұрын
@@gundamator4709well for one, sm6 isn't designed to be difficult to intercept because it is itself an interceptor. Secondly, ships have multiple radars located all over, on modern vessels they're located on different sides of the ships. Even if you could get an sm6 to hit a ship's radar directly, that's far from taking it out of the fight. The reason we dont do this is because if you can get an SM6 through, you can get an actual antiship missile through and ships need those sm6's for defense.
@MrNakedweasel
7 ай бұрын
@@92HazelMocha As the US Navy has specifically requested that the SM-6 have an anti surface capability, and has explored using the Standard Missile form factor for anti-surface warfare, and the fact they've been successfully used to attack surface ships for decades, would probably indicate you are wrong. Would it be a waste to use them versus a carrier? Probably. But if they are employed in combination with other dedicated anti-ship weapons, it might be what's needed to take down a very difficult target. Particularly if they are targeting masts and superstructure, because that's what their seeker would be able to see. I would not want to be on anything smaller than a carrier, if I was being attacked by a vessel that could strike me with SM-6.
@zaneroskoph7460
7 ай бұрын
I have the sneaking suspicion that the SM/F-15 flight was a concept test for ballistic/semiballistic missile interception using something else. Such as a stealthy, high-endurance platform whose networked sensor capabilities have been repeatedly brought up as a plus.
@jetfighter200
7 ай бұрын
UAF F16 would be old A/B variants so i doubt they can carry any state of the Art weapons and questinable is also that they know the exact locations of russian air defenses
@odakyuodakyu6650
7 ай бұрын
Do Venezula/US next. (before the US does Venezula for real in January!)
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
3 front wars - US loves to maximize wars for MIC $$$ ugh
@odakyuodakyu6650
7 ай бұрын
@@dexlab7539whats MIC?
@olelien252
7 ай бұрын
The kill on Cap was FF btw, dunno if you catch on later in the video
@apolloaero
7 ай бұрын
Doesn't the SM-6 have a 370 km range at least? Or is that only when it does surface to surface? Ik the SM-2ER had a 370 km range when it got upgraded, and it had the same set-up as the current SM-6 with the booster.
@UnexpectedInquisition
7 ай бұрын
It would be cool to see some very realistic scenarios for Ukraine, in terms of number of aircraft and ground defense of each type, and relative location base on what is known via currently public info. Simulated strike on the Kerch bridge, etc. With weapons they are known to have access to or be sent.
@brosephscags5745
7 ай бұрын
24:10 was that friendly fire? lmao looked like you got slapped down by a AIM120
@bladeslicemaster5390
7 ай бұрын
Educational
@deadmeat8754
7 ай бұрын
Nice
@MonarchNF
7 ай бұрын
I don't know how I would go about requesting something, but I have seen this SM-6 picture before as well as the articles about air launching the AMRAMM-ER (from the NASAMS 3) and comparing these to the AIM260 you guys have modeled. My limited understanding is that the AIM260 is designed around the form factor of a AIM120 so that internal stowage for F22s and F35s will not decrease missile count BUT there were other long range missiles under design and development that were larger and heavier that were not limited by such constraints. You guys have done a lot of work with NASAMS 3 and the AMRAAM ER, AIM260 and the SM-6 and I was wondering if it were possible to bolt all three of these to an F15 EX and compare and contrast them regarding range, speed, terminal kinematics, etc... Thank you for your time sirs!
@tkopp10976
7 ай бұрын
Seppuku is the word you were looking for
@Wolfe351
7 ай бұрын
you send in SM6 as a HARM and drain the defense with something like Stormshadow's or the US Stealth cruise missle coming in behind after in a staggered time on target attack before the defence can reload
@miriamweller812
7 ай бұрын
Moscow got hundreds of air defense systems. Good luck draining these.
@Strykenine
7 ай бұрын
SM-6 is a big ol' chonker when you strap it to an aircraft.
@Uselessnoobcow
7 ай бұрын
Hi Cap, have you seen the new PL-17? It would be cool to see a wargames episode including it
@Wyomingchief
7 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂 Yeah don't believe the CCP propaganda
@92HazelMocha
7 ай бұрын
@@WyomingchiefWhat part of that was propaganda?
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
PL-17 is freakin huge
@AusExplorer
7 ай бұрын
Cap, would it be possible to use the decoys to present as a flight or wing of strike aircraft [B1b? F-15? has to be some high danger/risk level aircraft] and cause the enemy to scramble their aircraft early and waste their fuel hunting down the decoys and then send the real attack in once the enemy can no long afford to engage due to low fuel? Those decoys can present as all sorts of aircraft on enemy radar, right?
@mattt525
7 ай бұрын
I believe there are serveral new classified weapons with this ability. Also several different development programs for decoy missles/drones that can project several contacts. Even a tow behind radar decoy for anti missle capabilities. Again I have only heard of these being in development and not heard of such weapons being used ect ect ect. But yes you could deploy another group to come from another direction to pull attention away.
@grimreapers
7 ай бұрын
That's a pretty good idea. Not sure if the AI will fall for it but worth a go.
@mattt525
7 ай бұрын
@@grimreapers Is it possible to have both sides AI setup by each side? Cheers!
@dennisvandermarkt8263
7 ай бұрын
Live in Michigan. Dark go man
@PreceptorGrant
7 ай бұрын
That seppuku bug sounds as though DCS thinks the missiles are still attached to the aircraft, so when the SM-6s get intercepted and destroyed it's taking the plane with it.
@jacobbeckley5292
7 ай бұрын
Hey cap, is there any way those SM-6's can be mounted in a B-21's Bomb bay? And if so, how effective would they be?
@jcadlols
7 ай бұрын
Or a B1-R
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
Unlikely, B21 is just too small
@jacobbeckley5292
7 ай бұрын
@@dexlab7539 What About a B-1 lancer?
@hphp31416
7 ай бұрын
yes
@HTKxLTVesta
Ай бұрын
Looks like the US Navy was spotted with a SM-6 (without the booster) mounted on a F/A-18E Super Hornet. 😅
@renzy7393
7 ай бұрын
You guys should do a carrier / air battle between BRICS and US / European Union
@BoraHorzaGobuchul
7 ай бұрын
Considering it's about as realistic as a UK vs US engagement, and those had been done, why not?
@hphp31416
7 ай бұрын
20+ carriers vs 2?
@delbancroft9339
7 ай бұрын
Darth is from Michigan... rolling hills of where?
@zahnatom
7 ай бұрын
i've always wondered why they dont just put those ship missiles on aircraft like ESSM as well for example
@readhistory2023
7 ай бұрын
AGM-158C LRSM (stealth) with a 200 nautical mile range. It's been service since 2018
@Spicy_Italian_Sausage
7 ай бұрын
@@readhistory2023 I believe he is referencing putting ship launched sams onto aircraft, not anti-ship missiles.
@phoenixrising4073
7 ай бұрын
Isn't the essm a sparrow variant? I don't know the history of the sea sparrow. Damn I should probably Google that but speculating is so much more fun because when you're right it makes you look smart. Run on sentences don't, however.
@92HazelMocha
7 ай бұрын
Weight. Those missiles are very very heavy. A single SM6 weighs 3,000 lbs, 10 times more than an Amraam.
@yournamehere9928
7 ай бұрын
@@phoenixrising4073 Eh, not really. The initial ESSM variant, Block I, mated the Sea Sparrow guidance section to a completely new 10" diameter rocket motor, but Block II now replaces that with a new guidance section that adds ARH and is now also 10" in diameter, making it uniform with the rest of the missile body. Block II has virtually nothing left in common with the legacy Sea Sparrow, other than retaining SARH homing.
@MattWaller04
7 ай бұрын
Could you use SM-6 as an AWACS killer?
@Anarchy_420
7 ай бұрын
CH Please create the SM-6 Block 1B🙏👍
@EE-dm9uv
7 ай бұрын
Sm-3 pls
@willwozniak2826
7 ай бұрын
That would be interesting.. they say one of Israel's F 35s took out a cruise missile in the air....not sure what Israel uses for air launched missiles.
@kskeel1124
7 ай бұрын
SM-6 is 5 million dollars per missile...😂
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
No worries - the US is only $33,000,000,000,000,000 in debt 😂
@Smokeyr67
6 ай бұрын
Seppaku was the word you where looking for
@jakeup4tune
7 ай бұрын
Michigan 👋🏽
@ObiWanShinobi917
7 ай бұрын
The SM-6 just isnt designed for tactical SEAD missions. Its designed to intercept incoming threats, mainly aircraft, but also missiles, and also has the added capability of striking a surface target. However, its not a stealth missile, and it doesn't have any onboard EW suites to help it get past interceptor missiles. It makes up for this by being insanely accurate (crazy good seeker), maneuverable, and pretty much immune to jamming. So its best used against softened targets that are not defended by interceptors, or are only lightly defended. An air launched SM-6 wouldnt really be an SM-6 anymore. It would be fundamentally redesigned with onboard EW suites, a low observability profile, and probably a dual-stage platform. It would just be a supersonic JASSM or LRASM with less stealth and longer range. Which we dont really need... because the JASSM already has massive range and is stealthy, and the LRASM is designed for ships. And both of them work incredibly well. Im sure the Navy fooled around with SM-6 on aircraft as a way to test whether it was viable to use aircraft loaded with SM-6 interceptors as an extra layer of defense against incoming missile threats. I can see their idea being to stick a couple SM-6's on Carrier Group patrol aircraft, and have them in thr air so that if a threat is detected, the aircraft can fly out to and engage the threat themselves before it enters the carrier groups attack envelope.
@joshualincoln7191
7 ай бұрын
I am from MI as well Dark. Northwestern Lower Peninsula. You?
@McAllisterCo
7 ай бұрын
Why didn’t Ukraine just launch the sm6 from safely inside its borders? It’s 300 miles from the border to Moscow? Not that there’s any need for this scenario since the cheap drones hit Moscow just fine.
@foshizzlfizzl
7 ай бұрын
I hope you know that those cheap drones, you probably heard in your propaganda about, are launched from inside Russia few kilometers away from their target?
@testgame2742
7 ай бұрын
@@foshizzlfizzlthats simply not true. The beaver has the range. Problem is it costs 250k and moscow is full of ew assets
@blademaster2390
7 ай бұрын
@@foshizzlfizzlso…you’re saying Ukraine has forces within a few kilometers of Moscow and Russia cant deal with them?
@rebelliousfew
7 ай бұрын
@@blademaster2390Ever heard of Pro-Ukrainian partisans? There are some inside Russia that launch attacks from within Russia with cheap, crappy drones. Do you honestly believe that any drone would make it all the way to Moscow without ever being detected? Moscow is surrounded by EWR and EW equipment, and it’s foolish to suggest any drone would make it 300 miles to Moscow without ever being intercepted by something.
@rebelliousfew
7 ай бұрын
@@testgame2742It is true, actually. No drone would make it 300 miles to Moscow without ever being detected. Moscow is saturated in EWR and EW equipment, along with plenty of SHORAD.
@gibbo_303
7 ай бұрын
moscow irl has about 20-30 S-400s protecting it
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
Ukraine has only a couple of Patriots at most
@taelorpickel2830
7 ай бұрын
Probably a little bit more. It also has Panstirs and S-350s. Not to mention S-300VMs.
@samedmundson6470
7 ай бұрын
Yup....that does look like Michigan.
@jmtpolitico80
7 ай бұрын
Thanks CAP for this specific mission. Cause Ukraine is now asking for F-18s. They are not approved yet but we are expecting they will be approved. As of now it's just the F-16s and Gripens! The Gripen side is very much a hush hush, but they will be coming around the same time as the F-16.
@willwozniak2826
7 ай бұрын
SM 6 dual block IA can be launched by the Army now from the Mobile launchers. Interesting putting them on fighter jets....👉👉 F/A 18
@jmtpolitico80
7 ай бұрын
@@willwozniak2826I am not saying they are going to do that. But it is a possibility in the future.
@willwozniak2826
7 ай бұрын
@@jmtpolitico80 Would be a smart move by The Americans......
@jmtpolitico80
7 ай бұрын
@@willwozniak2826 yes it would!
@willwozniak2826
7 ай бұрын
Oh I'm sure they will do it @jmtpolitco80.....🙂
@R3dd_1247
7 ай бұрын
Terrible formation flying today cap..😂 all jokes ❤
@user-jg7qw6bn1t
7 ай бұрын
The F-18 is from VX-31 the dust devils out of Naval Air Weapon Station China Lake. Dust Devil Mission Conduct safe, effective, and efficient flight test; representing the needs of our fellow aviators serving in Navy and Marine TACAIR squadrons. Support other test organizations with highly skilled personnel and specially configured aircraft. Provide highly skilled and capable search and rescue support for our aviators and community within the 2508 range complex and Point Mugu Sea Range.
@wmk4454
7 ай бұрын
I can't tell the difference between SM2 and SM6 send help
@Zachattack-ot2un
7 ай бұрын
SM 2 is semi active homing, SM 6 is active homing
@grimreapers
7 ай бұрын
Externally I think they are identical or similar because they have to fit the same ships etc.
@bzipoli
6 ай бұрын
cap i just realized you sound so much like that engineer guy
@ExiledPiasa
7 ай бұрын
hehehe... 420 and still climbing... hehehe
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@user-2410
7 ай бұрын
Air launched SM-6 that hits land… why would this even be a thing?
@DeusEx1977
7 ай бұрын
It likely wouldnt since the SM-6 is ludicrously expensive, but the "Standard" series of missiles (SM-1, SM-2, SM-3 and SM-6) has been used as the basis of an anti-radiation missile. Look up up the AGM-78 Standard ARM.
@AbdAlhaleemBakkor
7 ай бұрын
Consider using S350 in combination with S400 ....
@Wolfe351
7 ай бұрын
the Standard missile started out as Tartar RIM-66, during Vietnam they developed the air launched AGM78 Standard ARM anti radiation missle en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-78_Standard_ARM
@marcosavila8215
7 ай бұрын
16:35 dont do it!!!!
@user-og4vk6mc9i
7 ай бұрын
for teh algorithm!
@kskeel1124
7 ай бұрын
Why doesnt the west have an anti-radiation missile with a long enough range to safely engage the S-400?
@grimreapers
7 ай бұрын
They do: AARGM-ER - kzitem.info/news/bejne/xWymlo2PmIiCjY4
@miriamweller812
7 ай бұрын
Which one of the hundreds of launchers? And that's just S 400.
@taelorpickel2830
7 ай бұрын
Cause in reality they really don't have much in terms of that. Russia has anti-SEAD capabilities. It ain't Iraq bud.
@terencyowens9491
7 ай бұрын
This... But with SM-6 launched from bombers.
@user-fp2gr4ic3x
7 ай бұрын
IRL i am sure??? usa has "something" to stop friendly firing.
@Istandby666
7 ай бұрын
You stated the sm-6 has a range of 150 miles. Then you state it can seek over the horizon. Obviously 150 miles is over the horizon.
@superflyguy4488
7 ай бұрын
So a mission about the SM6 that didnt feature any SM6 action. Selection and Maintenance of the Aim is the key Principle of War, just not DCS videos.
@ricardofrancescato8000
7 ай бұрын
Answer: NO!
@UnitedStatesofAmorica
7 ай бұрын
Yo what?
@ItzRetro2019
7 ай бұрын
what’s the point of sending decoys after the sm6😂
@grimreapers
7 ай бұрын
Fools the Mig-31 radars.
@jax_cph
7 ай бұрын
who is saying they might not get the F16?. the once promised they will get. additional Denmark is going to sell some additional F16's to Argentina. which is very weird since US has plenty they could sell themself, instead of asking Denmark to sell some. but I guess that's geo politics beyond what we are privy to know. US is ofcause trying to reduce China's influence in South America, they don't want to see chine's figthers sold to Argentina basically.
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
Nope, the war will be over loooonnnnggg before Ukraine gets F-16
@josvercaemer264
7 ай бұрын
Is Moskou really the best protected area😂areal wise
@grimreapers
7 ай бұрын
Depends if wiki is telling the truth or not lols.
@92HazelMocha
7 ай бұрын
Yes. Well documented going back to the cold war. It's part of the reason the B2 exists.
@taelorpickel2830
7 ай бұрын
@@grimreapers Wikipedia isn't the most resourceful. As of now, nobody can gain any truthful outlook on how good Moscow defenses are. I assume they would be great though.
@good4politics
7 ай бұрын
Still asking for some sort of battle with drop tanks. If you can hit things with your drop tanks, you can hit anything. 🤣
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
Mr Putin was quite happy with that mission
@silenterection
7 ай бұрын
Keeeeeeeeev
@dexlab7539
7 ай бұрын
I think you mean Kiiiiieeeev?
@svenskdod
7 ай бұрын
Would rapid dragon be able to hit Moscow though 🤨
@tom23rd
7 ай бұрын
Cap, have a cuppa chamomile, breathe buddy, breathe 😅 Were they ever gonna beat S400? Nah, but they'd've given the kremlin something to think about. Rent free in Putins head? Priceless. Nice fight yall
@fluff_ruff
7 ай бұрын
MiG-29 air launched HIMARS!!!!!!!
@BerndBarsch
7 ай бұрын
If you like to have a nuclear answer try this !
@ChannelMrCouchPotato
7 ай бұрын
It’s KYIV, not KIEV
@willwozniak2826
7 ай бұрын
Interesting mission..the Army can now launch SM 6 from the mobile launchers now...and America's new Precision Strike Missile is being delivere to the Army..👉 I didnt know the Navy put them in the F/A 18.....China better be watching....👉🏻
@wst8340
6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@DAVIDGREGORYKERR
7 ай бұрын
The Ukraine Air Force are getting the F16 as they have been training their pilots in the states then they will return to Ukraine and they will be getting a few A10-Thunderbolts.
@miriamweller812
7 ай бұрын
Lol, really? Why do they want to trash those A10s? Those got zero chance to survive.
@taelorpickel2830
7 ай бұрын
A-10s? Really?
@skullofserpent5727
7 ай бұрын
Funny. Probably soon enough this scenario will become reality in caucasus region.
@riparianlife97701
7 ай бұрын
The US Marine Corps now has a truck-launched Tomohawk. Ukraine could launch those at the Kremlin from the Polish border.
@alphaastro3068
7 ай бұрын
That’s not gonna happen
@willwozniak2826
7 ай бұрын
@@alphaastro3068The Army has tested SM 6 truck launched missile......we shall see...it would be used on Guam if they do it.
@riparianlife97701
7 ай бұрын
@@alphaastro3068 I know. Ukraine can only launch their own, homebuilt missiles at Russia. I can dream, though.
@taelorpickel2830
7 ай бұрын
Doing so would risk mass carpet bombings and the plausibility of tactical nuclear warheads being deployed. Aside from this being a fantasy (i.e. never going to happen) Russia will further escalate if Moscow is ever hit.
@frua97
7 ай бұрын
Is Moscow well protected? Drones and a rogue Russian army were able to reach it.
@andrrunov
7 ай бұрын
Классно, ф 16 уварачиваются от всех русских ракет, которые пролетают в метре и не взрываются ахааххахах . Отличные настройки))
@user-fn2ce2oj8n
7 ай бұрын
KYIV! not kiev, kiev is russian transcription... since Kyiv is Ukrainian capital it would be right to write and pronounce "Kyiv"
@TheValiantZero
7 ай бұрын
I think Fire did okay, he started going West but got a missile alert and he reacted realistically by defending.
@Firedad376
7 ай бұрын
Appreciate the support, but I did reverse east and west in my head, but then I realized I did not have the fuel to run burner away from the 35's, had 3 sticks left and thought I could buy us some separation by turning them cold.
@chuckfarley4130
7 ай бұрын
Growling Sidewinder and Longshot have shown time and time again how American produced aircraft are cannon fodder to Russia's high tech AA missiles, namely the R-37M. Hypersonic, twice the range and supermaneuverable and cant be avoided... at incredible speeds. No way F-16's could get close to Russian borders with Russian MIG-31's looking on. Also, too...The S-400 Russian tech FAR surpasses anything ever developed by paltry western science. /s yo
@up4open
7 ай бұрын
Yeah, and Russia is doing a 3 day special military operation and winning.
@miriamweller812
7 ай бұрын
@@up4open Kid, Russia never talked about any kind of time line, Was always the NATO idiots and you social media Nazis. You fall for your own propaganda.
@justme7347
7 ай бұрын
I notice that you still have this awful habit of flying fare to close to other aircraft jigging about your risking hitting your own friendly aircraft
@somebody7337
7 ай бұрын
2 should do for today? Add what is supposed to be there a least make it realistic it feels like you're trying to give the ukrainians a way to win by limiting the Russian strength bruh just make the video correct please
@rebelliousfew
7 ай бұрын
Very interesting concept and scenario, but it’s highly unlikely such an attack would be attempted. The risk of political and military escalation would be too risky to perform.
Пікірлер: 255