Thanks sir you are great this case law is crist and clear😍🤩
@ksrinivasarao8437
Жыл бұрын
You said at one point of time (at 3 minutes of the 5 minutes video), both the companies are of England. My understanding is both the companies are German Companies. Ok, if Continental tyres is an enemy company (because of shareholders and Directors are Germans), what is the outcome ? It was Continental tyres seeking payment of its supplies. Probably because its employees who are English must be paid their salaries and for other expenses. If the House of Lords says, the England Company has enemy character, does it mean, they cannot get their trade debt/payment from Daimler ? You should conclude the matter on these lines.
@financialhappiness5976
2 жыл бұрын
As shareholders were German the case was ruled in favour of Daimler as during that period war was going on between German and England
@user-vq2uy2wd2q
6 ай бұрын
how clear it is Thanks sir
@anuradhaayush3786
2 жыл бұрын
Suprrrr clear explanation sir...thank you so muchhh sir..
@gauravnathan5701
Жыл бұрын
It is not void ab intio, it was void contract
@aryansoni6020
2 жыл бұрын
U r awesome sir 👍👍👍
@demonskull9474
Жыл бұрын
Amazing 😍👍
@vinayakpawar2965
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir 😇😇
@divyasinghrajput
2 жыл бұрын
Amazing sir 😍😍
@tuhin2183
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir💗
@arunmenon9836
3 жыл бұрын
what if only half of the shareholders were german? then how would the judgement be?
Пікірлер: 19