I watch a lot of physics type videos out of curiosity ( but I have no science training ). The structure of your videos are very interesting and easy to follow. The topics you choose and the connections you highlight are fascinating. Your accent means your speed of talking is slightly slower and this adds greatly to the ease of processing what your saying. The graphics really add to conceptually understanding each point you make. What I am saying is that I love your channel and have subscribed and that I cannot understand why you are getting almost no one watching. These are fantastic videos. Please please keep them coming, they are as good as anything else on KZitem. Thank you for all your effort.
@paschalislois4337
2 жыл бұрын
Very well done man! Para poli kalo video! Bravo!
@prational
6 жыл бұрын
Outstanding video! After watching this video I have a very good understanding of Lambda and dark energy. Thanks so much.
@The_man_himself_67
4 жыл бұрын
Well, you're not Bob Eagles, but still very good. Many thanks, perfectly pitched. New sub!
@ankitbishnoi
6 жыл бұрын
best video of all you-tube videos i ever seen! thanks very much making such a video
@kustomweb
6 жыл бұрын
Excellent, you are what KZitem is all about
@Jason-gt2kx
4 жыл бұрын
This is what the internet should be about. Sadly misinformation with spin and social media have made the internet bad
@csullivan626
2 жыл бұрын
Ugh I wish.
@conjurors-prelude
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this excellent explanation! I am a mathematician but I never studied physics. I'm trying to understand what all the variables in the friedman-lemaitre equations represent through my own study and I've fallen down the rabbit hole of Einsteins equations, all because I'm trying to understand why we believe that the universe is "flat". I've noticed other youtubers incorrectly define the dimensionless constant k (which can either be -1, 0, or +1) as some physical measurable degree of 1. This made no sense to me, so I've been researching friedman's equations. It turns out that using the normalized cosmological constant results in three scenarios: either k=-1 leads to a negatively curved surface, k=0 leads to a vanishing surface, or k=1 results in a positive curvature, all because we are dealing with normalized vectors in space. I apologize for the long comment, but your excellent explanation in this video finally tied everything together for me.
@cogen7996
4 жыл бұрын
thx man....
@zainabalshammari
3 жыл бұрын
I really like this video thanks
@teol.886
2 жыл бұрын
I guess this mystery boils down to finding a way to unite QFT and GR. Hopefully that would give us an answer.
@vikramgupta2326
4 жыл бұрын
One of the better explanations I've seen. Uh yeah, that is a big problem.
@raphaelthoma7521
5 жыл бұрын
Your accent spells: Greece Είσαι ωραίος ρε φίλε. Απλά, λιτά κι απέριττα. Και like και subscribe!
@pattern2054
4 жыл бұрын
Βόρειος ή Νότιος; Για να σε δω... Γεια σου φίλε, ευχαριστώ! :)
@ellycarasic3754
3 жыл бұрын
@@pattern2054 και εγω το καταλαβα . μολις σε ανακαλυψα! ειναι τελεια τα βιντεο που ανεβαζεις!
@Auston-m3c
Жыл бұрын
What if the the cosmetolical constant is the equation explaining the the speed of everything colliding together at an unknown point to create a new big bang that everything then moves and colliding at our known big bang point and it all just moves back and forth energy is never destroyed but this may explain how it can be created tell an infinite amount
@Auston-m3c
Жыл бұрын
Till an infinite amount*
@rana123470
6 жыл бұрын
Great video, Your voice and accent make it even more credible
@omsingharjit
5 жыл бұрын
Plz , you are best at explaining physics mathematically , keep it up for other cosmological theory's :)
@omsingharjit
6 жыл бұрын
i wanna ask , that , just like Darkenergy has that Cosmological constant ∆ , does any constant are available for Darkmatter ??? just like 1.5*10^-9 ???????
@jacquesd5781
6 жыл бұрын
I don't usually grammar police - but holy f*ck dude, fix the description...
@robertjennings7282
2 жыл бұрын
The only thing worse than mathematics is chicken scratch mathematics.
@baraskparas9559
3 жыл бұрын
QFT needs to be abandoned in favor of particle theory that interacts rarely, like the neutrino.
@subashs4565
3 жыл бұрын
What if i pump all the dark energy in to mars core
@asteromorphs1230
3 жыл бұрын
4:27 The universe is 70% dark energy. Not 68.3% dark energy.
@renantebiscante
4 жыл бұрын
This is a stupid show one day people will know there is no dark energy and cosmic acceleration
@djstud1987
2 жыл бұрын
And people still argue why god and science can coexist
@natmc8040
6 жыл бұрын
I love your work; thank you for the video.
@4or871
2 жыл бұрын
I try to combine the cosmological constant and the schrodinger solution on the planck scale. I used planck units. At the end I went back to SI units to compare with the measured vacuum energy density (0.63 10^-9 J/m^3.) Combine: 1) Einstein, cosmological constant 2) Schrödinger solution 3) Planck units Result: - vacuum catastrophe solved? 1)Einstein, cosmological constant Λ = (8π 𝐺 ƐΛ)/(𝑐^4) Planck units: G=1 c=1 Λ (6.1871424 10^34)^-2 = (8π ƐΛ [planckEnergy/planckVolume^3] 1.1056 10^-52 (6.1871424 10^34)^-2 = 8π ƐΛ 0.001149 10^-120 = ƐΛ 0.1149 10^-122/ ƐΛ = 1 2)Schrödinger solution, n=1 (ℎbar^2 𝑛^2 𝜋^2) / (2𝑚𝐿^2) = E Planck units hbar=1 n=1 m= mplanck =1 L= Lplanck=1 0.5 𝜋^2= E 1= E/0.5 𝜋^2 3)Einstein, Cosmological Constant = Schrödinger solution 0.1149 10^-122/ ƐΛ = 1 = E/0.5 𝜋^2 0.1149 10^-122 0.5 𝜋^2= ƐΛ Eplanck Eplanck =1 0.1149 10^-122 0.5 𝜋^2= ƐΛ 0.567 10^-122 = ƐΛ [planckEnergy/planckVolume^3] 0.567 10^-122 1.9561 10^9 /(1.61625502 10^-35)^3= ƐΛ [J/m^3] ƐΛ = 2.627 10^-9 J/m^3. Measured: 0.63 10^-9 J/m^3. I am looking forward to your response.
@antoniosousa984
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you!! Love your videos!
@caseycasper28
6 жыл бұрын
I have these physics ideas I want to explain but I am not a mathematician so I am trying to explain them the best I can. Assuming no Big Bang and If the retarded equation of electromagnetism vibration accounts for photon duplication via speed to a position in our past and the photon reenters our field through outside gravity pull but it takes an ultra long time because the force of gravity is so weak and mass moving at the speed of light to a black hole also enters the past doing the same thing as the photon proven by Maxwell's equations and if my visual description of the particle accelerator results are a visual equivalent to the statistical mathematics of the retarded electromagnetic equation and photon duplication to the past and that photon does reenter the field via outside gravitational forces and mass does the same as the photon when it enters an event horizon could that concept explain anti-matter and dark matter as Ultra Energy Mass that requires extreme amounts of time to slow by outside gravitational forces to enter our field? Could the energy lost required to speed the mass and duplicate the mass towards light speed assuming the mass also forms outside the event horizon because the change in speed because of the near freezing of the surrounding black hole mass and this effect causing it to exist outside the event horizon, if these ideas are true could they account for black hole evaporation and substitute a big bang theory? How does the observable Universe fit with relativity and quantum field theory? How does the retarded electromagnetic vibration equation related to the photon relate to the idea mass is formed via black hole gravity pull to light speed and the two equations for quantum field and relativity? Black holes send duplicated mass into the past where it enters the field via outside gravitational pull and the force required to duplicate mass accounts for black hole evaporation most of the Universe is moving at ultra mass speed where that mass will slow somewhere in infinity and the black hole will evaporate but somewhere in infinity the ultra mass speed will exist as what we see in our universe and change into stars equal to an infinite change of form from mass duplication to black hole evaporation back and forth. how would that fit into relativity and account for the visible movement of the Universe and is this system equal or expanding? Did the universe if infinite start as an equal amount equivalent to a black hole and another particle or one particle or a photon or a finite amount of balanced mass that perpetually changes form from our field to black hole to Ultra Mass Energy? Without judging me, could somebody please comprehend these thoughts and articulate them so someone could find a way to test and prove them?
@rajanmaurya5393
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for presenting the complex idea simply crystal clear way.
@kpx722
5 жыл бұрын
unimemverse
@KaliFissure
Жыл бұрын
By my reading, the cosmological constant represents both the amount by which the universe is crushed by gravity over given time period, and its reciprocal, the Ricci flow-through rate, the replenishment rate to compensate for this gravitational densification* in neutron decay cosmology we accept this flow and explain it. neutrons which eventually contact event horizons, because limits, become the vacuum flux for a single moment, then re-emerge from lowest energy density points of space, deep voids, where they decay into amorphous atomic hydrogen. neutrons decay into a proton, an electron and an antineutrino. a proton old electron is hydrogen. the decay from point particle to gas is a volume increase of 10⁴⁵. this is the expansion necessary to compensate for gravity. the initial decay product, amorphous atomic hydrogen, doesn't have a stable orbital electron so can't emit or absorb photons.dark matter. neutron decay cosmology. *made up word but meaning is clear.
@michaelkahn8744
Жыл бұрын
Alternative Explanation of Dark Matter and Dark Energy - 4-D Hypershere model of Universe can easily explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Void and even the reason why the measurement values of Expansion Rate are around 70 km/sec-Mpc Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. The problem of modern physics is they're trying to explain everything with particle physics and the physics is being cornered more and more to the dead end. To escape the dead end, they invent or design another imaginary particle in vain instead of trying to revise their way to approach to the problem. I agree to that idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Antigravity, Void... all these are just joint effects of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - Cited from www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy
@typingwithmyaxe4808
Жыл бұрын
dark energy and dark matter is the same stuff if there is enough vacuum pressure caused by energy density around then the stuff behaves as dark matter if there isn't then the stuff behaves as if it had negative energy density it's accelerating the vacuum outwards of itself, and not towards itself as it is in case of any positive energy density is what the stuff is ? no have aint an idea, it's something connected with the vacuum itself the vacuum is a field, it's quantized and it has some extraordinary properties
@basedboy
Жыл бұрын
Looking at the units of lambda (J/m^3): how is Joules calculated? Joules consists of mass, but how can there be mass in a vacuum?
@snrao1
4 жыл бұрын
Great video. But it doesn't make sense if you don't mention that Einstein's equations without cosmological constant predicted that the universe will "either expand or contract". Not just contract.
@aizaimran947
4 жыл бұрын
Sameeran Rao doesn't the negative sign after solving the equation mean that the universe would contract?
@nellvincervantes6233
3 жыл бұрын
Static universers would blow their minds but Flat Earthers would explode their body when they see this vid.
@bm-xi4bw
3 ай бұрын
Is the universe flat what if it's another shape? you need an new metic tensor?
@GeodesicBruh
5 жыл бұрын
Haha good question
@jacobplaylists
2 жыл бұрын
Sailor Moon brought me here, surprisingly!
@theobromino4962
6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. Easy to follow. How can QFT be so way off against experimentally observed by magnitude 122? Indeed a problem. What a discrepancy. Could you also provide similar explanation (easy to follow) in regards to dark matter? Love your work & accent. Your 'speak' makes me want to listen closely. Bravo.
@chandrabhanthakur9451
4 жыл бұрын
If Lambda denote the density of dark matter in vacuum, and universe is expanding then how is it possible to have a constant value of cosmological constant?
@rationalbelief4451
3 жыл бұрын
Need more videos
@C-man553
Жыл бұрын
Fascinating
@MrPimmetjepom
6 жыл бұрын
Good work! Subscribed! I hope that you get some more attention soon, you deserve it for sure.
@aahanimation
4 жыл бұрын
You don't know the power... of the Dark Side
@turtlep.9782
10 ай бұрын
Greek accent detected 🤌
@pattern2054
10 ай бұрын
Yep
@khonosthaijibon-3945
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you :)
@alimohammedkapdawala6201
3 жыл бұрын
Einstein hair is amazingly drawn...
@omsingharjit
6 жыл бұрын
first of all i welcome you as new great Physics teacher . , because i found you by this video !! your Explanations is so easy to understand for bigners like me . Thanks for your this move :) :)
@kobiromano6115
5 жыл бұрын
Aren't you confusing dark energy (expansion) with dark matter (extra mass)?
@willschadt9011
5 жыл бұрын
E=MC^2. Energy and matter can be used interchangeably.
@omsingharjit
5 жыл бұрын
Plz , you plz show how it's calculate 10^13 for quantum flax and 1 . 5* 10^-9 for dark energy by observation of expansion , I wan to know the trick that convert the observation of expansion into number of energy Density like 1.5*10^-9
@aidenwatler7153
6 жыл бұрын
Can you do a few videos explaining general relativity?
I wish i understand the math that goes with physics but i have reason to belive were over looking Leech Lattices
@krischalkhanal2842
3 жыл бұрын
Your voice is just like Einstein
@claudiosaldivia5646
4 жыл бұрын
Remember that Einstein it's the biggest plagiarist of all time that formula belongs to Henry Poincare...
@richardmarcus3340
4 жыл бұрын
The CC problem, lol. The only problem is the interpretation of the equations and measurements. I can't believe with all the brilliant men is the science fields, none of them can see the problem. They're really letting me down the past few years.
@z0gdave505
5 жыл бұрын
there is no reason to assume that everything that is, lies within the known universe. i dont get it, what am i missing something here? what reason(s) for why invoke D.E. as a mystery and not just assume everything falling outwards due to gravitation and the rate of acceleration a measure of the density of the wider foam outside of our sub-bubble?
@frankdimeglio8216
2 жыл бұрын
The ultimate unification and understanding of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY manifest as F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Here's the proof. This also explains why objects (including WHAT IS THE FALLING MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS clearly and necessarily F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. ON THE CLEAR, EXTENSIVE, SENSIBLE, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND UNIVERSAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly PROVEN TO BE F=MA ON BALANCE: Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma IN BALANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, it makes perfect sense that THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GREAT. I have explained the cosmological redshift AND the supergiant stars. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! By Frank DiMeglio
@frankdimeglio8216
2 жыл бұрын
WHY AND HOW E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY AND CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE: Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. C4 is the proof of the fact that E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. This explains the fourth dimension. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.) The EARTH/ground AND what is THE SUN are CLEARLY (on balance) E=MC2 AS F=ma. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy.) The sky is blue, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Great !!! This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! (This ALSO perfectly explains why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, HALF of the galaxies are "dead" or inert; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !! IMPORTANT !! Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Consider the man who is standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Accordingly, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course). Moreover, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is perpetual motion, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Therefore, it is correct that the planets will (very, very, very slightly) move AWAY (ON BALANCE) from what is THE SUN !! Moreover, I have ALSO CLEARLY explained the cosmological redshift AND the "black holes". GRAVITATIONAL force/energy is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. NOW, ON BALANCE, carefully consider what is THE SUN. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. SO, again, it ALL does CLEARLY make perfect sense; AS BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS go hand in hand. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma on balance. GREAT !!! By Frank DiMeglio
@aremdezmar996
5 жыл бұрын
It seems that in the end Space-Time could always have existed, and there's no need for a Big bang theory to explain why Galaxies are separating (moving) from each other, right? When I heard that the space is expanding, on what is it doing so? I understand that they say it is expanding because Galaxies are separating from each other, but if the explanation for that is Dark Energy/Matter case solved.... Particles might also have always existed...
@dragon2k1
5 жыл бұрын
Best video I've seen explaining the cosmological constant problem.
@billiecrouse8002
5 жыл бұрын
Am I wrong in thinking that Lambda may be represented by a whole number?
Пікірлер: 78