God bless this mans skill at instantly pronouncing names
@RobertsIsaacP
3 жыл бұрын
it reinforces his skills at summarizing and rephrasing their arguments... sandel is good at what he does
@bhavinshukla428
4 жыл бұрын
Prof. Sandel is a master surgeon peeling of layers of our reasoning one by one patiently..... amazing :-)
@thomasn.4015
6 жыл бұрын
There are only a few persons in my life, who inspired me like Michael J. Sandel. Well worth seeing!
@Aravinthmech
4 жыл бұрын
True. He is a legend
@kumarageperera1243
3 жыл бұрын
I do agree with you.
@rwakoojosam4804
4 жыл бұрын
Michael Sandal is my greatest of all time
@ugapelusa
3 жыл бұрын
His Only Presence Give Him An Air Of Strength, Patience, Goodness and Wisdom: Invites To Reflection On Our Own Capacity To Listen... Great Professor And Human Being...
@dinnerwithfranklin2451
5 жыл бұрын
Another great show. Michael Sandel always gets the best from the audience and always leaves me less sure of my positions than when I start. That is awesome!
@Nahid1347
3 жыл бұрын
I feel so much love, respect and gratitude for this man. Such bright delightful knowedgeable person / academia and what easy way of talking through his deep knowledge. Thank you. So pleased to have known you virtually. Hope to get to meet you so sometime. Perhaps in angel kinder time in the USA or anytime in the UK. ❤️⭐️🙂
@sandeep10
2 жыл бұрын
Profession Michael Sandel is so engaging and energetic in his lectures that inspire us in many ways!! thank you for this another awesome presentation!
@jimmyliu4614
3 жыл бұрын
It’s valuable to revisit this wonderful discussion at different stages of life.
@johnbaker7102
3 жыл бұрын
1:40:40 Michael Sandel’s stance on this question. Your welcome, and such a great point.
@user-du2of3lh1g
3 жыл бұрын
Man if i had a teacher like this growing up i would have been more driven to become educated growing up!!
@cdnest
Жыл бұрын
It is also important to know that the food bank is not a government institution. It is organized by private individuals, only volunteers work there and the food is donated by supermarkets. The state has nothing to do with it. In addition, refugees and foreigners in Germany receive a lot of money, some of which is sent to their home countries. Then these people go to the food banks to stock up on groceries. It may be new to many in the world, but many German pensioners are starving! German politicians prefer to give the money abroad, billions at that! Instead of giving it to your own people (by that I mean the population in Germany). Bad schools, bad nursing homes, low pensions that now also have to be taxed. In Germany you work 45 years to end up in poverty in old age.
@stevor.1385
4 ай бұрын
That is not a picture that is by any means objective. Like many other countries the division of capital in Germany is diverse and there is a relevant gap between the richer and the poorer people. But the question on how to deal with the distribution of limited resources was widely discussed in the video and the answer to just give it to your fellow people - if you carefully listened - must seem to be a far to simple answer.
@rolfkrayer5710
6 жыл бұрын
this video should be mandatory for every decent human being... why only 7,500 views
@shijosrhythms3318
3 жыл бұрын
Michael Sandal..one of the great political & economics philosopher of our time..
@makeHimknown3
2 жыл бұрын
He is truly a scholar and a great Moderator
@i2mediatv726
2 жыл бұрын
the differences between helping a family member over a stranger is morally sound only if the help is sustainable.
@ozwaldperkz7649
3 жыл бұрын
It's very nice to here you Mr. machael Sandel .
@mystory7960
3 жыл бұрын
St Paul's Cathedral, This is Brilliant, very encouraging presentation regardless Of ones "beliefs".
@monicawaigwa8215
Жыл бұрын
One of the best lectures I have ever watched.
@read1communications
5 жыл бұрын
Justice is a principle that truly need greater decrement for the common good.
@nataliasl2920
3 жыл бұрын
How many of you are as annoyed as me by people constantly trying to change the focus of the conversation? "We haven't talked about..." "There hasn't been enough of a discussion of..." "I want to talk about..." "We should focus on the other idea..." I wish they could concentrate on the subject that the moderator is trying to pick apart, and don't try to change it to their own agendas, just because one thinks that what is populating the mind is worth attention.
@SemperRight
2 жыл бұрын
Agreed. It was also interesting to see how many of the votes were explicitly self-serving.
@AndyMillerPhotoUK
Жыл бұрын
I enjoyed this discussion - but note that the views of those on the stage were entirely biased by the fact that this population was entirely made up of liberal arts students - none of whom pay taxes, work support families, and most probably few have assets that would be used to fund their generosity or will ever pay back their student loans.
@mujdawood7892
2 жыл бұрын
How would a rich nation like Germany or Great Britian end up in a situation where its citizens require to use food banks.
@Jingking1981
5 жыл бұрын
It is very surprising to me that nobody voiced a more Utilitarian point of view. For me, Social Security is not the security for those in need. It is exactly the opposite. Let's assume that there are some people below poverty line in the society. Then, those who are doing better economically are in a constant danger of being robbed, conned, or subjected to whatever worse fates. Thus, paying tax to support a Social Security system is to "buy security for everyone, especially for those who doing better economically". It is also likely the cheapest way to buy such security. From this point of view, I think it is obvious that Social Security has to cover even illegal immigrants. Because if the system only covers only a fraction of the poor people, then it will fail to "buy security" for those who pay tax, therefore defeating its purpose.
@khjewels
5 жыл бұрын
we need more social security checks and food stamps.
@robinsss
5 жыл бұрын
you have to have a social security number to receive social security...………………………………………..that would eliminate illegal immigrants
@mercedesholmes7878
4 жыл бұрын
I agree with your basic premise although the poor are not uncivilized animals who will attack other humans if not fed well. I have lived with and among nearly every socioeconomic level at different stages of my life and my personal experience favors the poor having a far stronger commitment to morality and integrity There is a fairly solid amount of anecdotal evidence amassed at this point that seems to show a negative correlation between privilege and altruism or civility. On a separate note though, the talk among GOP politicians about cuts to social security is particular onerous for the simple fact that social security is not a hand out or gift from our government. We have all had a tidy sum removed from every paycheck we have ever earned. We make a payment from our earnings that is earmarked to pay for social security. We do not receive refunds of the amount we overpay. The money is ours, not the governments. The system was configured so if you worked at least 10 years you fully funded your social security benefits. Now consider the number of years the average American actually works in their lifetime. If your personal social security allotment is considered fully funded after 10 years but you continue to work for 30 years beyond that point . You will continue to pay into the social security pool for those 30 years. The majority of Americans also contribute for 30 years beyond their full funding point. There should be a surplus of funds available for caring for the minority who were not able to work 10 years to earn their allotment. Instead they are telling us that there is not even enough left for those who paid into the system their whole lives and in most cases paid in far more in their 30 - 40 years of working than they will ever be paid in benefits. So where did all of OUR money go?.
@koutoubyavision4738
4 жыл бұрын
true but the question is not whould you support but in the case you cannot support everyone which ones get the priority. however dont forget that this crowd is from a church so charity does not differentiate, unlike politics.
@KD-oz8ci
5 жыл бұрын
The students are too sensitive to political correctness and not participating/ contributing well to the discussion.
@ebywonder3507
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah! You're right. Harvard students would have had a more objective and rational responses to the professor's question. Too many politically correct students on the stage.
@johnbaker7102
3 жыл бұрын
I agree, they are more emotional and a lot less rational in their arguments compared to some of the audiences in other videos of Michael Sandel
@tatuloa
3 жыл бұрын
The nature of correctness , prevents one from the risks of slings and arrows., hans thin skin...
@dananskidolf
3 жыл бұрын
@Desinformation aus Russland im Bundestagswahlkampf Well, some apparently deem the local history to play a role in the morality and that's interesting - I'd want to know, when does it stop playing a role, and why would it make a difference? One guy felt that it was Germany in particular that should be careful about this type of bias, but I don't really think the lessons of Germany's history are to be simply ignored by the rest of the world because "it wasn't us that done it". Nationalism to the point of delusions of supremacy is still present in many places. As for missing/evading the point, I think particularly towards the end some of the students just got too comfortable saying whatever came into their heads even if the conversation had long moved on. Still, many things came up that were well expressed and on topic, so good on them.
@hiheloByby6902
4 жыл бұрын
Imao 20:38 the Guy has been Raising his Hand for an hour
@ellielyndon1645
3 жыл бұрын
LMAO 😭😂
@psychicspy
3 жыл бұрын
Your children would disagree that you as a parent have an equally moral obligation to help another unrelated child with comparable needs.
@hamstarr100
5 жыл бұрын
Observations:mens answers are more pragmatic womens more utopian, as a whole the university mindset or atleast the sample here is very out of touch with the realities of how the world works and the extent of finite resource and benevolence
@Iwasneverevenhere
4 жыл бұрын
this discussion is not about how the world works. It's not exactly about practical feasibility, either. This is a discussion about moral values. It is about how people think we should act. A lot of moral philosophy ends up being either very complicated to apply in practice, or not resting on a solid foundation. But justifying your own viewpoint as "it's how the world works" is obviously not a solution, as the status quo is arbitrary and often unfair and simply accepting it eliminates any possibility of change. Enlightenment thinkers obviously didn't describe how the world worked back then either. You could probaby describe some of their theories as utopian as well. But their theories shaped how the world works today. So today's "utopians" might well shape how the world will work in the future.
@monikagarnys5504
4 жыл бұрын
Men are too simple to understand women. Sorry.
@ard1805
4 жыл бұрын
S. Q. Scameron Like whether or not it’s morally ok to eat people. We’re not advocating for it if we believe that it isn’t morally wrong.
@ard1805
4 жыл бұрын
MONIKA GARNYS Sure thing “all caps”.
@patrickmugalula4210
2 жыл бұрын
I agree with the poll answers but I suspect lots of the people on the stage are not being honest because this is a public place and they want to be seen to answer in a particular way. Perhaps anonymous polls would be more effective to get truthful (and representative) answers.
@dannyyoung6950
Жыл бұрын
That our western culture and nation have been successful to the point of allowing abstract conversations like this in a world of wants needs and that is often brutal should call into question yhe cosmopolitan view espoused by so many on stage feeling guilty or their privilege
@husnumurat
4 ай бұрын
This recording was filmed when there was no war in Europe. Five years onwards I am puzzled how companies are allowed to act stateless. If they have access to markets where consumers are, they have an obligation to their respective societies
@agendafocus
5 жыл бұрын
= For the Love of Truth & Wisdom }}} t.y. from Canada Sept. 2019
@mountainmarvels8240
Жыл бұрын
Ever the optimist. all efforts should first be put into proactive solutions including immediate collection programs from local communities to facilitate all, even if just a bowl of soup for today, but if having 'not enough to go around ' is the immediate reality, one has to remember that the 'state' (german government or other) has the right to ask you to 'give your life in defense of the nation', and basic reciprocity suggests that 'sustaining' or 'feeding' the citizen, over the foreign national, as a priority, can be rationalized.
@gariochsionnach2608
2 жыл бұрын
... as human beings are social animals, who exist and NURTURED and cultured (cultivated) in layers of social bodies: family, the local community, the town/city, the nation ... so may be our moral responsibilities are proportional to quality of the nurturing we received from these layers of society, but with the proviso that in terms of 'inter-social' conflicts, the lesser / localized social body should give way to the larger / more universal social body ...
@gavinmc5285
Ай бұрын
If the general will of Rousseau begins at country for virtuosity then the individual has already been subsumed under state. Perfectly excuted consistency in the Montesquieun universe may be ideal (as end to end absolutist moral logic) but life isn't like that - even if aspects of life can (or could, could have) be[en].
@silone20101
6 ай бұрын
Prof. Michael says, that those or a person doesn't know with foreigners then should you don't want to love them. If you like them because your mind thinking about expanding their business cultural, why not educated yourself then try to do business with them?
@ChaudhryRajinderNijjharJatt
3 жыл бұрын
St Paul didn't carry the Bible in his hand but he Preached the Gospel from the core of his heart where it gets written in the holy spirit, which is common sense. So, the Bible dead letters have nothing to do with the Christianity of heart.
@sencanboz2645
3 жыл бұрын
Among so many well-presented arguments from participants I think one argument that's been made was in my opinion the most realistic one, and also contemporaneous straightforward. A nation state & biology matters as a trigger for making prejudice decisions when it comes to hiring or benefits, especially so in countries like Germany with tied historical heritages of the post-war era. Again, it tremendously depends on generation and age. For example, most German younger adults have more gentle world perspectives on anti-semitism than older people do. I am honest with you. For example, if I were to choose between two applicants with a grade 1.9 and 2.3, respectively, I would rather hire the guy with a grade 2.3. Not just merely because of their inheritance but because they as a foreigner and probably a victim of hate had gone through a lot in terms of endurance, trials, allegation, trepedation, speculation etc. They deserve a chance. Of course, Germans come first to get hired cause "I have been grown up and raised in Germany. From a moral point of view, I feel that I have a self-induced obligation to fullfil cause I feel like I am part of the German society and more importantly I am working for a German company." There is no other choice to make than that is how I feel about.
@sencanboz2645
3 жыл бұрын
It's all about gathering together relevant information about hot debated issues, of which one piece of information is 'justice' for obvious reasons.
@ahmedbaradwan6619
Жыл бұрын
Hiring based on qualificatio rather than nationality if we believe in progresing
@vukasinvasic8924
2 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@gautamsharma045
4 жыл бұрын
38:00 that's awesome 😂
@psychicspy
3 жыл бұрын
Foreigners have no claim to the social services of another country even if they have been invited into that country. The benifits they receive are a gift, not a guarantee and the needs of the citizens of the host country should always come first. It is the citizens who have paid into the system that provides the benefits. Not the foreigners. To behave otherwise is to invite a flood of "refugees" all looking to cash in on your generosity.
@angeljr.tarranza5083
7 ай бұрын
Humanitarian Obligations
@ahmedbaradwan6619
Жыл бұрын
اعتقد بأ الاهمية يجب ان تشمل كل من يسكن المانيا بطريقة شرعية بعيدا عن أي إنتمائية دينية أو سياسية أو عرقية
@pradeeppandey7228
5 ай бұрын
🙏
@gcase08
4 жыл бұрын
I get suspicious when an appeal 'for the greater good' or "common good" is made. It always means that one or more individual's life, liberty or property will be sacrificed in order to achieve the "greater good". That is not good in my opinion, especially for those being sacrificed. If someone volunteers without coercion or threat to sacrifice themselves for the greater good then I say fine but it never should be forced on anyone. That is tyranny of the majority which is not uncommon in Democracies and dictatorships. A democracy is like two wolves and one sheep voting on the dinner menu, ie, tyranny of the majority. A free republic is two wolves and one sheep voting but the sheep is armed with lethal force. It keeps things on a level playing field.
@jojomojojones
4 жыл бұрын
Yet you’re cool with forcing people to earn money to live? While others are given the power to rewrite the rules in their favour, forever securing their positions as arbiter of value and the deserving? Do you even believe in solidarity and benevolence of the fortunate? Your views are outdated Industrial Age justifications for a lack of humanity.
@gcase08
4 жыл бұрын
jojomojojones Silly collectivist twaddle.
@lovkeshjangra674
4 жыл бұрын
@@gcase08 you are blessed... Hahaha
@golgumbazguide...4113
Жыл бұрын
Explore Golgumbaz with Guide Jahangir
@sergkapitan2578
3 жыл бұрын
What about All kinds of manipulative people, who can pretend to be needy???
@gislainelee3181
4 жыл бұрын
Anybody else wonder why these mic runners had to use stick to point at people? Why cant they just take it off and hand it out to people? So distracting.
@Teekles
Жыл бұрын
At 43 minutes currently. I think of the organization of the human body and think that citizenship is somewhat like being apart of a human organ. Individual cells all contribute to the overall success of the human and this is of course a critical point that humanists and globalists espouse. Still, liver cells can not replace the job of heart cells or neurons. If they are able to give sustenance or prevent harm of each other despite being in different organs, this is also valid and important. Differentiation is good and necessary and yet most of the time it's more sensible for one liver cell to support another than it is for a liver cell to support a kidney cell, yet without all of them working together the system will fail. Without this diversity, the whole human can not function and in a way world citizenship would turn us back into amoeba. And yet the stem cells that can dedifferentiate into other cells as needed through out the body akin to refugees are also critically important and further bolster diversification and function of each organ. Ultimately without different cultures and peoples, uniformity would be a demise -- and still we are all part of the same greater organism totally entwined. A bit of a paradox, yet with a simple solution: if we all play are parts perhaps we can survive long enough to *evolve*!
@pacajalbert9018
3 жыл бұрын
prosím rozoberte ekomicku právo od Moderne nad vlády a kolonizácie
@afrijacoub6835
3 жыл бұрын
Well done sir
@86Ellinas
2 жыл бұрын
Where did you find all these "students"? Isn't it peculiar that almost 99% had the same opinion about national identity?
@safaali2184
5 жыл бұрын
as esh nation-state have the commitment esh nation have its commitment to its people
@nour1584
3 жыл бұрын
the black dude in white at the front is hilarious, his reactions are so funny
@nancymohass4891
3 жыл бұрын
Wish prof.S. Would also ask , don’t we all need to ask ourselves ,this Q:what are the reasons of immigration and poverty …..is it going too far on polices ?!?!
@chuelbongan5584
2 жыл бұрын
여기서 배출되는 인재들이 세상을 움직일 것이라는 생각이 들자 마음이 풍요로워진다.
@chanpol321
5 жыл бұрын
competition vs hand-out approaches?
@ahmedbaradwan6619
Жыл бұрын
علما بأن ٩٠٪ من الاجئين اتو من دول غنية بخيراتها إلا أن حكوماتهم تنهب خيراتهم وليس هناك توزيع عادل في أوطانهم
@cdnest
Жыл бұрын
Is it an advantage to be born in Germany? Most certainly. But these advantages did not fall from the sky, they were hard won by our ancestors. By hard work, I don't just mean physical work, but above all mental work. Just ask someone who comes from another country if they would feed someone else's child rather than their own. It is unbelievable how far removed these young people are from the reality of life, from real connections, from pride in their ancestors and from pride in themselves. Germany, for example, is the country with the most volunteers in the world. Volunteers work for free, for example in food banks, in clubs, in the fire brigade, in the rescue service, as lifeguards, in hospitals... We are the world champions in donations, up until 10-20 years ago we were still taking care of people on the street , by interfering when they argued, when they did something wrong. With the advantages in Germany comes the fact that we are the most productive workers in the world! We offer free education to everyone, from tradespeople (which you even get paid to train for) to doctors and rocket scientists, the training is free! In Germany we pay the highest taxes and duties in the world (Belgium excluded, but they have a different tax system) And how much of these taxes and levies reaches the citizen, who pays for everything? Always less.
@glossyminimo
4 жыл бұрын
I love how some of these people think
@공정환-n1q
20 күн бұрын
Garcia Margaret Clark Jason Martin Donna
@future2976
3 жыл бұрын
Talking about giving British workers more preference in British companies is wrong and it should be skills which should be considered while giving jobs. My question is what will you do if you are wealthy businessman and you have one child who you know is not worthy of taking your business in his hands and will ruin everything you gained so far after your demise .On the other hand you have one manger or any employee of yours who is smart, skilled and taken your business on exemplary growth. Who will you choose to give your business in hands of.
@nelsongonzalez4533
2 жыл бұрын
I wonder 🤔 what Jesus would have said 😂 if he and his disciples were taking part in this discussion?🙄 All I know is that in this world there's nothing that comes by easily and free ... except what nature provides like free air, water and sunlight. A good Christian would sacrifice anything morally and unconditionally for the sake of moral principles to help others in needs.
@АЛЕНОЯАПАЛЛИ
2 жыл бұрын
Preferences should be given to those who have skills and knowledge, but if the skills and knowledge are equal, then company has to give preference to the citizen of the country. The country that has no obligations before it's own people is good for nothing. How to build the patriotic nation? Value your people and acknowledge them. Be respectful and helpful to the foreigners but make jour priorities right.
@limagoncalves8153
5 жыл бұрын
When Michael Sandel ask to a German girl about welfare payment and basic needs if it's correct to give it to people in need regardless of the nationality is too much pressure. It's not ease to respond as a citizen. 😥
@konormccracken
4 жыл бұрын
@ 01:02:07 I love you
@RoyStubbs
5 жыл бұрын
Democracy is not given and Freedom not given. Living and severing God Democracy and Freedom will be earn by people. By living with God and following the rules of country.
@andrewche4399
2 жыл бұрын
Utter at 19:14 is a hero
@anandshinde6707
4 жыл бұрын
Philosophy of all time great leaders of world such as Nelson Mandela. Mahatma Gandhi. Mother Teresa should be accepted to solve such issues.
@Nippless247
2 жыл бұрын
Whats happening in America makes me sad.
@burtingtune
Жыл бұрын
Nobody gave a good rebuttal of Muhamad's family analogy.
@hamrazahmad850
3 жыл бұрын
Who's notice guy in the front row closer to Chinese face girl raising hand on every question?
@FieldDebby-o5h
11 күн бұрын
Johnson Jessica Hernandez Kevin Thompson Richard
@pacajalbert9018
3 жыл бұрын
Pozeral som film 📼 kde Adolf Hitler na otazku investora mal od povedať či robotníci sú pripravení zomrieť treba tomu filmu rozumieť a ne zmilit si to tak ako na začiatku WW 2
@ashuu3
5 жыл бұрын
my quote - If I knew something useful to me but prejudicial to my country I would reject it from my soul. If I knew something useful to my country but not to the other country I would try to forget it If I knew something useful to humankind but prejudicial to non-humankind I would regard it as a crime because I’m human being or rather I am necessarily a animal while I am a Human being only by chance
@FlowerGary-t3e
10 күн бұрын
Thomas Laura Davis Larry Hall Donald
@ДмитрийВербицкий-у7д
14 күн бұрын
Clark Amy Walker Betty Thomas Sarah
@amrayoup2978
6 жыл бұрын
the analogy made, that tries to equate the affinity and biological bond in family to the relation between state and its citizens, is not correct and misleading. a state should not differentiate between its citizens based on arbitrary reasons such as ethnicity. the moment the state accept a person to become a citizen of its own with all the obligations that entitles such as paying tax and respecting the law; the relationship should be reciprocal and the citizen should expect to receive the same rights that state offer to everyone else equally. A mother has an obligation to her children dictated by the biological rights, the same way the state will have to its own citizens dictated by the reciprocal obligations and rights and not due to arbitrary reasons that divide people based on their origins. the main point here is the definition of citizenship and it should not be accepted to have different degrees of citizenship. Therefore parents have a duty toward their kids before any others kid, the same way the state has to its own citizens before any others citizen but while the kids gain this benefit from their parents through biology, a person will acquire this obligation from the state through citizenship and not be affected by arbitrary factors.
@pacajalbert9018
3 жыл бұрын
prosím ako možné porovnať USA bespesčnost ktorá není sama od seba bespečna
@normancline3
4 жыл бұрын
human rights is it a fundamental human right to family to pass a man's seed forward the fight to protect my only begotten grandson from government taking charge against parental objection if I could get and opinion if a man has a fundamental right to family ?? please get back to me on this question thank you and much respect to michael thank you sir .
@Andrea-br4gv
6 жыл бұрын
There is no ideal world! This questions motivate debate, but they are not realistic in real practice! As for Socrates he was accused of corrupting the young...
@dinnerwithfranklin2451
5 жыл бұрын
As someone who has watched some of Sandel's lectures and read a couple of his books I think that you have hit on his purpose exactly. He has for over thirty years attempted to increase public discussion of those things that we all intuit are important and yet we do not talk about. The very debate is the goal. So, job done!As for Socrates perhaps you should read a paragraph or two beyond the charge. He was corrupting the young by teaching them to examine their own positions and opinions and by extension those that society decreed should be accepted without question.
@cdnest
Жыл бұрын
Man sieht sehr deutlich, wer ohne jegliche Beziehung aufgewachsen ist. Das völlig freie Individuum denkt nicht an seine eigene Familie zuerst, es hat gar keine enge Beziehung zu den eigenen Eltern, oder Geschwistern. Die "neue Jugend" will auch keine Kinder mehr... Ich bin total erschüttert.... wohin soll das noch führen ?
@shofmanki
4 жыл бұрын
The fossil fuel industry should pay for all of these services in any and all countries. The wars that are being staged to protect petroleum extraction is a major antecedent to the creation of refugees. It is not the citizens of any one country that are responsible for their plight but big oil and other selfish libertarian activities. Our responsibility as citizens is to pay more attention to what politicians we are electing and for us to select representatives that supports policies that do not degrade our planet or the lives of other people.
@pacajalbert9018
3 жыл бұрын
Kto aktivoval WW 2⃣ mimo Európy
@nirmalscaria8206
5 жыл бұрын
So, am I the only one who came here after class by Atish Mathur sir?
@tangoz811
4 жыл бұрын
Who?
@TheHologram3299
Жыл бұрын
Jesse is based. Doesn’t help that 3/4 of this audience aren’t British
@jakdevaney594
5 жыл бұрын
The amount of lightbuld heads shaking their filaments.
@pacajalbert9018
3 жыл бұрын
S ktorou vojnou sa dá porovnať WW 2 ktorá mala byť konečnim riešením
@mikrzido8923
3 жыл бұрын
Arian german vs german citizen?
@MidnightRambler
3 жыл бұрын
Democracy worked..Trump was elected and brexit,
@sudaneseintellectualprogram
2 жыл бұрын
religions can not define family and needy out side of biology.
@breakaway2x
3 жыл бұрын
At 24:00 when Puck (is her name?) speaks, she's totally giving off the vibe that she's an LBGT community member. That's why she thinks family doesn't matter or children coming before strangers or borderless nations. People speak and believe whatever they "are". So she doesn't have a husband, or children of her own cuz she's an LGBT, so OF COURSE she's going to be against standing up for putting families first over strangers. She doesn't have one of her own! Her family is made up of other non-blood related family as her family. People failed to see this very important fact! You ask a question to an orange, you'll get an orange answer. You ask the question to an apple, you'll get an apple answer. I totally disagree with her thinking because I am not LGBT.
@pcaso
3 жыл бұрын
Ask her to renounce passport and take a passport where one cannot travel. Her struggle ends where real struggle for those countries
@dananskidolf
3 жыл бұрын
I agreed with a lot of what Puck says morally speaking (though I have major reservations in practice) and I'm just some straight dude (cis, if you must know) who loves his family (yes, blood-relatives and all). This rather violates the assumptions you make. Also there isn't really a reason why in this day and age (and location) that someone couldn't have a family for whatever reason you're assuming for Puck here. So it follows that you're wholly mistaken about where this line of thinking is coming from. It's not so hard to see how people like me and Puck might think this way. Remember we're talking about morality so a lot of what you feel for your family should just be disregarded as biology (not that it's unimportant, just that the debate focus was the morality, and biology tends towards genetically selfish motives). I concede there's also a huge reciprocity factor in these relationships (especially to your parents), and there are clear societal expectations - you could hurt them more by helping someone else as they would assume you'd help them preferentially. But I think taking your family obligations to an extreme is a negative thing from a moral standpoint, partly for consequentialist reasons, partly as universal compassion, and partly as a preference for my autonomy over selfish genetic bias. BTW, Puck is a cool name - made me think of Midsummer Night's Dream and homages thereof.
@robinnautica9773
Ай бұрын
Yes this woman has no idea. I swear nobody will actually feed a stranger before their own hungry child or wife/husband in an actual crisis.
@johnnysprocketz
5 жыл бұрын
The idiocy on stage is the result of 30 years of affirmative action.
@ard1805
4 жыл бұрын
The world has and always be a fight between doves and hawks. None will ever win because neither philosophy works on its own. We need assholes who think they’re better than others, and we need people who don’t care if they are and just want to help. Neither side will ever win, for long.
@NISasquatch
Жыл бұрын
A lot of wokies in London
@TheNoblot
2 жыл бұрын
system problem greed is not on the object but the subject, therefore answers & question are related to a system education which is totally objective, however money is material & spiritual, when a woman marries a rich man for money, she is not thinking of the paper but rather what that paper will get her as material benefits, her ego will become inflated when others see her with a pink diamond. The crown uplifts her ego she gets the espiritual benefits of money 💵 her fears will diminish, money give her support over those that have less & she will feel better off, however it is not a guaranteed of health neither survival.
@PoliticalEconomy101
5 жыл бұрын
Socialism is the best system that can harmonize particular identities with a universal identity, special interests with the common interest, and the local with the global. Socialism is for one economy, one class, one culture, and one identity, yet we still need local communities and nation states to effectuate socialist goals. Liberal pluralism is antagonistic and corrupt and should be abandoned.
@yengsabio5315
5 жыл бұрын
Like, say, in North Korea?
@LaoDan13
9 ай бұрын
@@yengsabio5315 Like, say, in Denmark!
@anandshinde6707
4 жыл бұрын
Priority should be given to most needy and hungry. Humanity should be above all even nationality.
@lseul8812
4 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a globalist push that might be characterized as tyranny by others. Care to explain your opinion further? Such priority would certainly sacrifice the rights and liberty of some even many that worked for those resources.
@thephilosophicalagnostic2177
2 жыл бұрын
The common good is incomprehensible. Why? The needs and desires of tens of millions of people are incomprehensible. Sandel is making the same mistake all statists make. He assumes some brilliant, caring person out there can lead us to the common good. Can't happen.
@andrewma7965
5 жыл бұрын
Nothing the students say makes any sense at all. Only Michael Sandel makes sense.lol.lmfao!!!
Пікірлер: 267