Thanks for watching everyone! If you are enjoying my videos from the National Museum of the USAF, please click the thumbs up button because they're not getting many views and I'm reliant on the advertising revenue to help pay for these videos (because I don't want to do product placement). Cheers!
@robertspence831
10 ай бұрын
The F-101, what a beauty!
@chippercorgi2247
10 ай бұрын
Awesome to see a tour of this plane, it feels like one of the less well-known jets, but I've always loved the design. Also, watching this video I realized the F-101 first flew in 1954 while the spitfire first flew in 1936 and the F-15 in 1972.... just 18 years apart in either direction. It's amazing how fast things progressed.
@rayschoch5882
10 ай бұрын
My dad was a primary test pilot for the prototype XF-88. Everyone was disappointed with the initial speed of the 88, which topped out at about 750 mph with the original engines, but new engines cured that particular problem, and the resulting redesign became the F-101. When other manufacturers emphasized single engines during the '50s, McDonnell stuck to two engines as a pilot safety measure (as well as a performance booster).
@mirthenary
10 ай бұрын
This was the first model I remember my brother making
@anandmorris
6 күн бұрын
Ooh i had an airfix voodoo. Beautiful design.
@timwingham8952
2 ай бұрын
Seriously good looking aircraft.
@historyinbitesizedchunks5857
10 ай бұрын
Always liked this aircraft, it is very underrated and not talked about often.
@user-tn1vc1xz5d
10 ай бұрын
I love planes designed by humans and not computers. They may not cut it in today's world but they are more characterful and some were beautiful.
@SaturnCanuck
10 ай бұрын
Thanks Paul. As I mentioned before, the Voodoo was one of my favourite aircraft, and thanks for mentioning our version, the CF-101 Voodoo. I have fond memories of these flying, seeing them at the Canadian International Airshow, and of their massive afterburners with a loud “crack” and a long flame out the back. Not many people know Canada used them with the Genies, thus the RCAF was a nuclear power, and the one in the Canada Aviation Museum in Ottawa has one attached to it. And why not come up and see for yourself!
@DigbyOdel-et3xx
10 ай бұрын
Yes, the CF-101B in Canadian service was a cool jet. Saw ones from 409 sqd. "Nighthawks" out of CFB Comox perform at many Abbotsford Air shows during the 1970's and early 80's. Besides the RCAF using Genie Rockets on our Voodoo's through till 1983. From 1961-1968 our CF-104 Starfighters in Europe were tasked with a nuclear ground strike role, using USAF supplied nuclear free fall bombs. And for a short time we had BOMARC nuclear tipped surface to Air missiles. What this means is that through much of the 1960's Canada's RCAF was totally nuclear capable.... I bet most Canadians don't know this.🤔 The Voodoo was a first rate interceptor through the 1960's and 1970's. For the RCAF it was tasked with the role the CF -105 Arrow was to be. I know us Canadians have a fondness for the Avro Arrow, but honestly the CF-101B performed in the interceptor role as good as the Arrow would have and had longer range. No it did not replace the lost jobs once the Arrow was cancelled but it came pretty cheap. We bought 65 Voodoo's for the cost of building the 'Pine Tree' radar defense line , which was south of the DEW line.🤔
@SaturnCanuck
10 ай бұрын
@@DigbyOdel-et3xx Thanks for the reply. She was a great plane. And I agree with EVERYTHING you said - if you get my meaning
@johnt.4947
9 ай бұрын
The F-101 was/is always a favorite jet fighter of mine. It looks what we used to say "bad assed". I was a USAF jet engine mechanic stationed at Langley AFB, VA in the early '80's. Twice I was fortunate to see CF-101 taking off. (I assumed they were there for TAC conferences?) You are right about the AB. When that single stage lit off, a loud BOOM came across the ramp. It was incredible!
@spitfirenutspitfirenut4835
20 күн бұрын
The 101 in this video is ex RCAF, has the spotlight on the port side below the cockpit.
@uss_liberty_incident
9 ай бұрын
Your videos are a treasure, and are documentary-quality. Never stop being excellent.
@PaulStewartAviation
9 ай бұрын
Cheers!
@gavinhawkin6632
10 ай бұрын
It’s like Christmas morning every time you put a new video up. Matey boy!!!!
@Alexmay111
10 ай бұрын
I ended up coming across a fuel sprayer for the J57 afterbuner at a museum here in Canada. It's now a display piece at home.
@clamshacker8263
10 ай бұрын
First time I saw one up close my impression was it’s huge 😮
@TroyMorePhotography
10 ай бұрын
Remember a CF-101 doing a winter takeoff with afterburners from CFB Winnipeg. Spectacular sight!
@PaulStewartAviation
10 ай бұрын
An incredible sound too!
@DigbyOdel-et3xx
10 ай бұрын
@@PaulStewartAviation Yep and the notable double thud sound as each afterburner ignites was way cool too.
@DamonJackman
10 ай бұрын
Loved the video! It's great to see this era of jets in so much detail, thank you!
@johnt.4947
9 ай бұрын
This is my favorite century series aircraft. Very capable looking, or as I said in a previous reply, what we used to call "bad assed."
@johnt.4947
9 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@PaulStewartAviation
9 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@TheHobartAviationFan
10 ай бұрын
👍 nice one
@PaulStewartAviation
10 ай бұрын
Thanks ✌
@DigbyOdel-et3xx
10 ай бұрын
I was at the Abbotsford Air show on August 12 1973, when CF-101B tail number 101019 exploded at the top of its afterburner used climb out ( one of the four aircraft in the display) probably around 15,000 ft. I was only a tot but remember like it was yesterday. A sunny day, blue sky and bam like that a big orange flash. I first thought it was a cool effect, but seconds later I knew it was not with two parachutes and and smoke with smoking parts falling back to the ground. It all fell into a corn field. Both crew lived but apparently suffered some burns.
@zackaryshipard8572
10 ай бұрын
Kool video
@josephpiskac2781
10 ай бұрын
Paul I think the NORAD SAGE Computer should have be recognized. I believe SAGE could not only remotely fly the interceptor though also fire it's weapons. Truly an A.I. pilot and SAGE is credited with making the intercept mission viable. I know little about the Delta Dart and look forward to your presentation.
@benshakespeare268
10 ай бұрын
Lots of interesting design features in this tour. Good stuff 👍
@allgood6760
10 ай бұрын
Thanks for this 👍✈️🇳🇿
@fletchb2937
10 ай бұрын
Waiting for you to do one on that F106 behind you.
@PaulStewartAviation
10 ай бұрын
Yep that’s coming :)
@YYZ-SRQ
10 ай бұрын
It amazes me the huge leap in advancement that these century series had. Go back just 9 years (1945) and the fighter was a single prop piston engine with the exception of just a few early jets that came in limited usage towards the end of the war. These century planes could easily break the sound barrier which was only achieved in at the end of 1947. Today, airforces are mainly equipped with advanced versions of fighters that were introduced 50 years ago (F16, F15, F18). Seems that the pace of innovation and development is nothing like the 1950's which is amazing considering design was via slide-rule engineers and drafting tables as they thought outside the box. And yes the F22 and F35 are tech marvels but the pace of development is at a snails pace.
@staralliancefan1245
10 ай бұрын
Another interesting video. Why did it have the two engines with all of the other century jets had just one?
@akabill79
10 ай бұрын
Love you vids Paul
@Bad_Karma1968
10 ай бұрын
As always a great and informative blog Paul
@PaulStewartAviation
10 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@user-tn1vc1xz5d
10 ай бұрын
Neil Armstrong flew the Century Series as a project pilot.
@caspercat39
10 ай бұрын
Great video as always 👍
@adrianw7011
10 ай бұрын
Good video, some interesting details and close ups, really highlighted the proximity of the exhausts and the intake designs. Look forward to the next?
@koh_ling
10 ай бұрын
👍👍 great work!
@damienwilloughby
10 ай бұрын
Hey Paul 😁
@PaulStewartAviation
10 ай бұрын
Hi!
@bluebarron351
10 ай бұрын
Interesting video. It seems that Mcdonnell were being a little pig headed keeping the two engines when everyone else was moving to single engines? Extra weight, thirst and for little benefit?
@PaulStewartAviation
10 ай бұрын
It is interesting that many others did move to one engine. The F-15 and 14 didn’t, though. I wonder if the navy were keen on two engines due to the over-sea flying??
@NoName-ds5uq
8 ай бұрын
I believe the CF-101 was the only nuclear armed Canadian aircraft. Genie missiles were shared by the US, I believe initially under US control, but later transferred to Canada for a period. Yeah, my details are sketchy at best! 🤣
@tickmagnet
10 ай бұрын
nosewheel could use some air
@zoperxplex
10 ай бұрын
There is an aphorism in the aviation industry that says "If it looks good, it is good". I think this plane follows that aphorism.
@thefrecklepuny
10 ай бұрын
Look how compact the B-58 is compared to the B-36 at the start of this video!
@DG-jq7il
10 ай бұрын
I'm sorry, but shile not often included in the century series,, the F117 and the F111 were definitely century series jets, and they both were twin engined jets
@Bushy_P
10 ай бұрын
does the F-111 count as a century series fighter?
@PaulStewartAviation
10 ай бұрын
Good question, but no. 😂
@DigbyOdel-et3xx
10 ай бұрын
Don't forget the F-4 Phantom was originally called the F-110 Phantom.
@margarita8442
10 ай бұрын
did woman fly dis darlinks ?
@capitolabill1921
9 ай бұрын
The AIR-2A is a rocket, not a missile.
@PaulStewartAviation
9 ай бұрын
My mistake
@snakevenom56
5 ай бұрын
wtf when did you record this, went i went this week they had the f-101 or some other thing like it right against the starfighter and had the U-2 hung from the ceiling
@PaulStewartAviation
5 ай бұрын
Sept last year
@Toby-pq7dr
10 ай бұрын
I went flying with you one time Paul do you remember??? Aka Mark Hannum 🥸
Пікірлер: 62