Thank you - one of the best explanations I have seen on DIC
@LateNightVideozz
9 күн бұрын
My God that was a really good explanation. Thank you
@yixuanshen8366
2 жыл бұрын
Dude, you are saving my life
@tarunkumarpalli7580
2 жыл бұрын
Wow dude, its so, clear to understand
@potharlaanil5621
2 жыл бұрын
I salute for your explanation..
@nourelhoudabenyahia257
2 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation!
@phamdung3884
Жыл бұрын
This really is a simple explanation. Thank you so much! ^^
@peterallen8573
11 ай бұрын
Good explanation.Thank you.
@keshaxLOVEx
Жыл бұрын
very useful thank you
@moneeralhalabi1272
Жыл бұрын
Great work
@christeenamathew8606
2 жыл бұрын
crystal clear 🤟
@riyaroy7386
Ай бұрын
Thank you
@pak2966
7 ай бұрын
Are the two Nomarski prisms exactly the same (just inversed) or do they differ?
@gregvisioninfosoft
9 ай бұрын
Does anyone here have broad experience using DIC? I was hoping I could ask a question. I am trying to understand this in a general manner. From this video at 0:06 timestamp, we see that two (I assume 'matched') 'DIC Nomarski Prisms' are required. One below the sample, and one above. Apparently there is no concept of a single one-size-fits-all 'DIC Nomarski Prism. As when I look at actual part numbers, for example in the Olympus microscope line, there are several of these: U-DIC-10, U-DIC-20, U-DIC-40, U-DIC60, and U-DIC100. What I notice in the differing catalog numbers is what appears to be the 'Magnification' is different. This implies the DIC Nomarski Prism is somehow 'optimized' to a given magnification. My first question is - what actually causes these DIC Nomarski Prisms to be different in their manufactured characteristics? In other words, if one were to hold both a U-DIC10 and compare it to a U-DIC20 - how exactly would they be different?
@anindita6913
2 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@shivanin8708
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!
@CHAMPIONSBio
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot bro .....
@nihalhathaway4089
Жыл бұрын
thank you very much! Isn't the condenser after the polarizer, between prism and stage?
Пікірлер: 24