Imagine going back to 1942 and telling Admirals Nimitz and Yamamoto about all this. The JSDF, _stealth jets that can frickin' hover,_ and the close relationship between Japan and the US.
@MercenaryX10A
3 жыл бұрын
My guess is that they would be less surprised than you might think.
@BlooD_RaVeN_MkII
3 жыл бұрын
Yamamoto did not want to fight the U.S. I think, if you were to tell him what is going on today, he would of smiled.
@kyurenm5334
3 жыл бұрын
@@BlooD_RaVeN_MkII aaand then you mention anime. And then he goes like "they will need to evaporate our cities before I will let this happen", and now history make circle.
@snagletoothscott3729
3 жыл бұрын
"How the hell did they get those?" We, uh, sold it to them" "What!?" "Yea, to help fight China" *"Whaaaaatttt!!???"*
@OMG2SEXY
3 жыл бұрын
Yea, I can imagine the look on their face if someone from the future told told them whats it’s like in 2021. Nimitz and Yamamoto faces would look like Pikachu surprise face! 🙀
@Nealikus
3 жыл бұрын
Kaga.... That's a name I haven't heard in a long time.... A long time.
@GM-fh5jp
3 жыл бұрын
+1 Internet point if that's an Obi-wan reference...
@liquidh6344
3 жыл бұрын
Since Midway obviously
@clmk28
3 жыл бұрын
@@liquidh6344 hahaha good one
@Vermilionleader
3 жыл бұрын
Imagine if the supposed "we may need more of these" are named soryu and hiryu.
@loboheeler
3 жыл бұрын
I was surprised they were allowed to name new warships after WW2 IJN warships. They even use the IJN naval battle flag.
@guest6398
3 жыл бұрын
Unbeknownst to the world, the Japanese call it a “helicopter carrier” because in battle it transforms into a giant helicopter shaped like a dinosaur.
@skoshman1
3 жыл бұрын
That's just stupid. It's a secret heli-carrier that turns into a Mecha-Godzilla. It's the Mogami-class that turns into a dinosaur. Everyone knows that! ;)
@pracylopgonzer3176
3 жыл бұрын
No, I think you’re confusing it with Mothra
@shirolee
3 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHA
@kentarthur8329
3 жыл бұрын
that some Command & Conquer shyt HAHAHA
@AlphaWolf789
3 жыл бұрын
why can i picture that now lol
@jerichothirteen1134
3 жыл бұрын
As an Aussie I feel better knowing the Japanese have a carrier. How the world has changed.
@juliemunoz2762
3 жыл бұрын
they have 600 tons of plutonium stored from their plutonium reactor and can build 5000 nuclear weapons in short order if they deem the need.
@danjohnston9037
3 жыл бұрын
The Irony Of The New Century
@paulbedichek2679
3 жыл бұрын
The whole world is safer after Aus announced they would acquire nuclear power submarines from UK and US. No carrier the Chinese have now or could build in the next 20 years would be the equal of the Japanese carrier with F-35's,I wonder if they plan to acquire the carrier version the F-35C.
@bbreksa514
3 жыл бұрын
Darwin🤔
@Ryzen776
3 жыл бұрын
Any country near China should be armed to the teeth, just so they don't get any idea.
@b.elzebub9252
3 жыл бұрын
I like how Binkov always ends every video with the message that only peace can bring us all together. Lets hope the Japanese or anyone else for that matter never have to actually use their weapons for real.
@USSAnimeNCC-
3 жыл бұрын
Agreed but when you got nation like US and China who want more geo political power over the other because they don't want to share also yeah China is sus and don't questionable thing but let's not forget how the US is a hypocrite in the freedom and democracy when you look at it history recently and since 1950s
@tinto278
3 жыл бұрын
The sooner we go to war with china the better we will be. Wait another 10 to 20 years it might be to late.
@Wargunsfan
3 жыл бұрын
Binkov sounds like Neville Chamberlain in 1938. And the Chinese are playing the role of NAZI Germany. That worked out so well.
@tinto278
3 жыл бұрын
@UCuBVehJj5hkKxGMrOWOxbmQ Not much fighting with rifles if we have a war against china. Just be a lot of button pushing.
@Wargunsfan
3 жыл бұрын
@@edgelord8337 Crash airplanes into tall buildings and you get invaded.
@MachineCode0
3 жыл бұрын
Japan: Hey guys it's not a carrier, it's a "helicopter destroyer" World: Oh yeah what's it armed with? Japan: Self defense weapons, and helicopters only >for now< World: What was that? Japan: Nothing, look we named it Izumo class because its a "destroyer" but bigger than a cruiser, so we used the name of an old cruiser for it, everybody does that now. World: hmmmm . . . Japan: Fuck it, lets reuse an aircraft carrier name for the second one and just put planes on it World: Unsurprised face.
@daralcampbell2171
3 жыл бұрын
Kaga was a BB first
@euaf-crimson1730
3 жыл бұрын
@@daralcampbell2171 sounds like the first stage for a Dark Souls boss fight
@MachineCode0
3 жыл бұрын
@@daralcampbell2171 I don't think she was ever completed as a BB though, she was launched months before the Washington Naval treaty and then finished as a carrier iirc.
@MachineCode0
3 жыл бұрын
@opisex Also Japan: We'll build nukes next, don't make us do it, we can knock em out by next tuesday, don't test us!
@andreworiez8920
3 жыл бұрын
@@MachineCode0 They don't need to.... They have allies with ICBMs.
@MB-en3ij
3 жыл бұрын
The mention of another Kaga aircraft carrier sends goosebumps.
@thepapamoon6006
3 жыл бұрын
At least they are on our side this time lmao
@ranni9536
3 жыл бұрын
@@thepapamoon6006 true lmao
@ranni9536
3 жыл бұрын
We don't want another World War...
@NotKelloggsCornflakes
3 жыл бұрын
@@thepapamoon6006 They were on our side in WW1...
@ramenseie2481
3 жыл бұрын
@@ranni9536 yes nobody wants WWIII, but the Tension in Asia is too much, it will inevitably happen. preparing for the first strike to retaliate. the question is When will it start or how prepare are we when it comes. Im Asian I might get Drafted when that time come. just thousands KM away. If no Nukes poor neighboring countries can fight , too bad poorer countries don't have counter ICBM they just relied on Allied nation like the US & UK (former colony).
@richardstarkey2247
3 жыл бұрын
Now they just need some carriers named Akagi, Soryu, Hiryu, Zuikaku and Shokaku.
@sgt.future7134
3 жыл бұрын
Midway and the coral sea won't like that
@stanl2005
3 жыл бұрын
perfect target practice for guided missiles.
@JoergSi
3 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for the launch of the new Japanese "Troops-Transporter" Yamato!
@imjustthere9343
3 жыл бұрын
That thing never fought it was too expensive lose
@HoshikawaHikari
3 жыл бұрын
The 'hotel'?
@celsetialarchives5909
3 жыл бұрын
And the next gen pilot assisted guided missiles
@killerso_0138
3 жыл бұрын
Your forgetting the japanese "supply ship defence" Musashi
@haleyalitz9976
3 жыл бұрын
@@mhoadievdelapaz3703 ruled the pacific before it sank.
@SirShadowman
3 жыл бұрын
Some designer in Japan: "Lets name this one Kaga, what harm could it do" Some ww2 vet in midwest us: (Fires Up old P-38 Lightening)
@Wargunsfan
3 жыл бұрын
You mean fires up old Dauntless dive bomber.
@stab74
3 жыл бұрын
Should've named the other one, Akagi.
@andreworiez8920
3 жыл бұрын
Except his grandson... Or great-grandchildren is flying the F-35s off its deck. The fighter aircraft are ALL US Marine Corps.
@Poctyk
3 жыл бұрын
@@stab74 Akagi is not a province. JMSDF names their "helicopter destroyers" after provinces. Although naming one "Kaga", instead of literally any other province name was taking piss. Might as well call another one "Shinano".
@marvingulanes5577
3 жыл бұрын
Then mid 2025 Japan would sea trial the SHINANO
@FST606
3 жыл бұрын
Greeting from Japan. In many topics of modern Japanese combat ships in the English-speaking world, these ships are called "destroyer". But in fact, the Japanese government and JMSDF do not classify their ships as actual destroyers. In Japanese, these ships are called "goeikan" officialy, and many Japanese people do so. If you translate it directly, it means "escort ship"(but the nuance is closer to "combat ship"). However, for some reason, it's translated as ”destroyer” on many English webs like wikipedia. This is probably because the ship numbers of these are DD-XX. Izumo class ships are also designated as DDH-XX. Or perhaps The Ministry of Defense introduced these as "destroyers" casually in its English official web without thinking. However, in any case, its just customary. There is no deep meaning. In my opinion, The Japanese government has no definite intention of making its carrier ownership ambiguous to the international community. Also, Japan has no treaties with any countries that restrict the ownership or operation of aircraft carriers, unlike Russia.
@legatvsdecimvs3406
3 жыл бұрын
I thought "kaibokan" was "escort ship"? Either way as you said it - it is the "DDH" code which means - "destroyer with helicopters" in US/NATO ship code, like DDG - "destroyer with guided weapons".
@shanemcdowall
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info. Always good to get local Intel.
@GenocideWesterners
3 жыл бұрын
@储有奈 He just said that russia is restricted by the Montreux Convention which does not allow aircraft Carriers and submarines to transit through the Turkish straits. That is the reason why then soviet and now Russian carriers are classified as heavy aircraft carrying cruisers and why the submarine element of the permanently deployed soviet 5th eskandra was provided by the northern fleet instead of the black sea fleet.
@orneryokinawan4529
2 жыл бұрын
@储有奈 yeah and they're junk.
@looinrims
2 жыл бұрын
@ryanb Chinese ships aren’t junk bro, this isn’t the 1850s
@mkms685
3 жыл бұрын
These countries who are overreacting about Japan's acquisition/conversion of Aircraft Carriers were utterly stupid and narrow-headed. Aren't they aware of the present situation within the Asia Pacific region? It isn't Japan who is the biggest threat here. It's China! China's already possessing 2 full-size Carriers. Note the word... FULL-SIZE. Compare to Japan's converted ones. Is it still a crime for Japan to rearm themselves for their own self-defense and stability of the entire Asian region? Come on, guys. This isn't the year 1931 or 1941 for you guys to fear Japan. It's already 2021! Get over it!
@GabrielLopez-mo2xo
3 жыл бұрын
Litterally everyone is over reacting because we are hype Japan will be able to help us more against China only talkies and Chinese shills dislike this move
@luxeternity
2 жыл бұрын
It wasn't Japan that frequently enters SEA airspace and waters recently. That was PRC
@陳博穎YouTube
2 жыл бұрын
I take a wait-and-see approach
@arsyadidris6349
2 жыл бұрын
@@luxeternity exactly bro.
@arsyadidris6349
2 жыл бұрын
Not to mention north korea casually flinging their experimental ballistic missiles in Japan’s direction. And then we have the russian pacific fleet doing exercises north of hokkaido. Problems from three directions.
@primastanislaus9184
3 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting for Kaga to get her refit for CV operations and have join training with USN around Pearl Harbor that'd be some strong message in historical context.
@tommyhunter1817
3 жыл бұрын
Perhaps the Kaga will make a port call AT Pearl Harbor. In 2031 or even better, 2041.
@primastanislaus9184
3 жыл бұрын
@@tommyhunter1817 Yeah, maybe even sooner if US-JP keeps doing joint training.
@jerryle379
3 жыл бұрын
@@tommyhunter1817 you do know Izumo same as kaga visit Hawaii few year ago right ;)
@Spymaster001
3 жыл бұрын
it would be even better if both Kaga and enterprise was dock side by side
@andreworiez8920
3 жыл бұрын
Are you aware that the F-35s operating from its decks are ALL United States Marine Corps? Japanese ships, American aircraft... That is a hell of a statement.
@1988thefreeman
3 жыл бұрын
I look forward to seeing the enterprise and the Kaga side by side 🙂
@zachboyd4749
3 жыл бұрын
Their namesakes were bitter enemies, but now they’ll sail side by side as allies.
@snagletoothscott3729
3 жыл бұрын
"It's like the Wasp class, but it has a center deck elevator" *Makes loud Dauntless noises!*
@orneryokinawan4529
3 жыл бұрын
Whistling Death of the F4U. My grandpa was terrified of that plane. We saw one at a museum and told a story saying hearing that supercharger open up through the wing cowlings was a dance with death he'd experience again and again.
@chloekaftan
3 жыл бұрын
seeing as america protecting taiwan from china is doubtful, and also failed to protect hongkong from china, its appropriate that japan actually starts to do the peacekeeping in southeast asia, america is unreliable and only act when their interests align, unlike japan who actually live in southeast asia and benefit greatly from the maritime silk road and chennai vladivostok maritime corridor, as the only country in SEA advanced enough to protect the southeast its a perfect time for japan to start being allowed to build aircraft carriers especially since america can't be trusted to do their damn job, america has no right to enforce restrictions on japan if america doesn't even want to mobilize the 7th fleet to defend taiwan. if taiwan falls, then china has control over all maritime trade routes in the southeast, i'm sure i dont need to explain why that would be a bad thing for the world economy as unstable as it currently is
@mkms685
3 жыл бұрын
@@chloekaftan To think of it, Taiwan is the "modern Poland". I am also thinking about the same scenario that both Americans and the Aussies would do nothing to save Taiwan is a sudden Chinese blitzkrieg striked the island. That's why it's very favorable for Japan to rearm itself since it would be Asia's "last bastion" just like Britain if everything's lost within the region. Japan would also most likely to be the staging point for both the Americans and Aussies to conduct both bombing and amphibious operations to invade China.
@stCOMMANDER_TE
3 жыл бұрын
Kaga is back and Enterprise is being built (3rd General Ford class) Hopefully when these two meet it will be better than last time…
@edwardcho8559
3 жыл бұрын
Gerald R. Ford was a president
@AMNG1994
3 жыл бұрын
Japanese logic: These aren't aircraft carriers! These are just destroyers. With a flight deck. And can launch aircrafts.
@Edax_Royeaux
3 жыл бұрын
American logic: These Alaska-class ships aren't Battlecruisers, they're just large cruisers! That's longer than most Battleships. Armed with Battleship guns...
@nicolasheredia956
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that's how politics work You can't build aircraft carriers? Put some missiles on them and call it a "Aircraft Carring Missile Cruiser" (AKA Russia's aircraft carrier) Can't build rifles? Just call them carabines and you're good to go (Germany in 1920-30) It's actually pretty easy to avoid certain restrictions
@HoshikawaHikari
3 жыл бұрын
WW2 Japan: These aren't battleships or cruisers, they're 'aviation' battleships and cruisers, oh, and then there are also a few 'aviation' submarines too XD
@AMNG1994
3 жыл бұрын
@@nicolasheredia956 Can't commit war crimes? Call them accidental drone strikes haha.
@ottersirotten4290
3 жыл бұрын
@@nicolasheredia956 Cant build anti tank rifles? just produce 20mm armour piercing hunting rifles(also Germany 1920-30)
@MrAwsomenoob
3 жыл бұрын
"Bitch how dare you still live!!!" Enterprise and kaga meeting each other again.
@andriys.1860
3 жыл бұрын
I was hoping I'll find such a comment
@arturobayangos1223
3 жыл бұрын
Sir Binkov Japan has 50 years of war experience building carriers, destroyers and submarines. They did not copy unlike the neighbor which bought decommissioned carrier now Liaoning, copied and modified and reproduced. Made in Japan steel is better than its neighbor, Sire.
@bukansiapa9619
3 жыл бұрын
-100000000000000 social credit😤😠😡
@richardscathouse
3 жыл бұрын
Seventy-five years ago. They are all dead. Today, they struggle to out together a Toyota Corolla that doesn't have ten first year recalls. 🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭☠🙄
@AWaBfantasy
3 жыл бұрын
Everyone gangsta, until the empire unexpectedly returns.
@arlecchinosimpyes7534
3 жыл бұрын
But this time they ally with US
@rodfel2001
3 жыл бұрын
@@arlecchinosimpyes7534 It's a marriage of necessity ... once the husband is down, the wife will be raped and or dismembered ... sad reality of war ...
@britishneko3906
3 жыл бұрын
and then the Yamato is made with AA and aircraft
@andreworiez8920
3 жыл бұрын
One important distinction. Although the ship is Japanese the AIRCRAFT are all USMC
@ret7army
3 жыл бұрын
JDF purchased same aircraft, F35Bs as USMC but owned by Japan
@kingwarrior5028
3 жыл бұрын
Is that a bad thing
@Griblin1
3 жыл бұрын
@@kingwarrior5028 no why would it be a bad thing
@AlphaAurora
3 жыл бұрын
Is this a temporary arrangement? JMSDF has F-35Bs
@andreworiez8920
3 жыл бұрын
@@AlphaAurora they dont yet sale was autherized last year. I just learned of it.
@markmierzejewski9534
3 жыл бұрын
Japanese elder looks to the sea. A single tear rolls down his cheek. A faint whisper from the past.. "Tennōheika Banzai"
@gabbyprincip1575
3 жыл бұрын
"yeah we can't do that anymore grandpa, we'll bankrupt the country if we do kamizake attacks with f-35s"
@qarmatianwarhorse6028
3 жыл бұрын
I didn't come here to feel 😢
@krellio9006
3 жыл бұрын
@@gabbyprincip1575 😁
@oldkid8811
3 жыл бұрын
@@christosvoskresye on that note it is about time Japan builds their own nukes. China has it coming.
@gascogne3622
3 жыл бұрын
@@gabbyprincip1575 XD
@dominickefrim3088
2 жыл бұрын
Happy for Japan. As an American it feels good to see our allies fielding state of the art fire power. It makes the US stronger to have allies that can hold their own. 🇺🇸
@forzared101
Жыл бұрын
Imagine being that F-35 B pilot, landing the first aircraft on a Japanese ship since the end of WW2.
@Joe-ie1mi
3 жыл бұрын
So this ship is sorta "Midway" between a pure helicopter assault ship and a pure Aircraft carrier? hope they build more than 4...
@horacefields736
3 жыл бұрын
I believe these are radar equipped. So, they should actually work.
@edding8400
3 жыл бұрын
Ahum. I see what you did there :)
@StArShIpEnTeRpRiSe
3 жыл бұрын
With 6 they got a "Pearl".
@brucenadeau2172
3 жыл бұрын
japan only has 2 the other 2 helicopter destroyers are smaller
@georgebarnes8163
3 жыл бұрын
Same as the old Invincible class ASW
@dougtso4126
3 жыл бұрын
Yes they did, and that's just the first one, more to come.
@michaelmurphy779
3 жыл бұрын
Good on them. They might need them with the way China is arming itself.
@Chosen_Ash
3 жыл бұрын
Good they need to repeat ww2 after China thinking to much of them selves
@thomaszhang3101
3 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmurphy779 I mean, isn’t competition good for innovation? It will be interesting to see what this round of arms race offers the civilian market a decade from now.
@tritium1998
3 жыл бұрын
@@Chosen_Ash You mean surrendering with the same flag and losing more islands as compensation? The resourceless islands are struggling with their debt and stagnation to build the smaller carriers as it is.
@speed150mph
3 жыл бұрын
Am I the only chuckling at the irony that soon a United States Marine unit is going to be training people on board a carrier that shares a name with one of the ships that bombed them at Pearl harbour, the Marshall Islands, and Midway.
@faithnfire4769
3 жыл бұрын
Is it irony? Or poetic justice? The grandchildren of those who tried to kill the US Marines, now serve alongside them. Kinda cool
@primastanislaus9184
3 жыл бұрын
Its no irony, its just international politics and cooperation at work. The fact that people can move on, for the good like how the USA helped the UK in both World Wars or for the bad in how an Ally in WW1 became an enemy in WW2 because they don't get taken seriously in the interwar League of Nations (look up Race Equality proposal and how Woodrow Wilson fuck that up if you interested in how fast international politics can change)
@romanbuinyi
3 жыл бұрын
Lol, 500 years ago people could have been relieved from service, be recruited by other side and fight former allies a week later, and you are talking about war that happened 80 years ago(4 generations).
@user-xm5cj5js2d
3 жыл бұрын
大日本帝国万歳 🇯🇵 from JAPAN Land of The Rising Sun ☀︎ 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇳🇱🇨🇦🇳🇿🇦🇺🇮🇳🇹🇼 ありがとう 我々は日本国を自衛するために復活します
@iamaloafofbread8926
3 жыл бұрын
bringing the imperial Japan out of retirement for 1 more round.
@djozenkoski472
3 жыл бұрын
If the need arises we will fight side by side like brothers to defend each other! 🇺🇸🤝🇯🇵
@user-xm5cj5js2d
3 жыл бұрын
@@djozenkoski472 どうぞよろしくおねがいします🇺🇸🤝🇯🇵
@wiryantirta
3 жыл бұрын
I suppose this is one of the impact of the existence of F-35Bs. Previously navies that don't usually think of operating naval fixed wing due to not having full sized carriers or how the gap capability of a standard fixed wing fast jet to i.e Harriers didn't make fielding Harriers worth it. Now a "light carrier" can field a VTOL jet that isn't that far down in capability to a standard F-35 (other than slightly decreased speed/range/payload).
@Gerwulf97
3 жыл бұрын
Well said. They are a gamechanger.
@brucenadeau2172
3 жыл бұрын
it has the same speed as f 35a the deceases are range and payload
@YuiFunami
3 жыл бұрын
the downside is the price of f35 b is huge
@tonysu8860
3 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Even Western allies who have "ski jump" carriers mainly flew STOL aircraft like Harriers which had almost no range or payload but was all that was available for decades. For a long time now, if a Harrier ever confronted a modern, frontline fighter it would be in pieces within seconds of detection so could operate only against very low level, limited opposition. The F-35B may still be a compromise but is far closer to what you'd expect of a fully capable multi-mission front line fighter that should more than hold its own against even advanced defenses.
@termitreter6545
3 жыл бұрын
@@tonysu8860 Frankly, I doubt that the F35B will fare any better against a modern stealth-fighter than the Harrier would do against an F15. The F35B was criticised for its slow speed and limited payload as well.
@ThatsMrPencilneck2U
3 жыл бұрын
This is nothing against Binkov. Binkov is cool. I just find it funny that the comment section is full of Chinese anti-West comments, while KZitem is banned in China.
@apolloaero
3 жыл бұрын
Have you not heard about China's 50 cent army? They get paid 50 cents per post or comment spreading ccp propaganda. Well it's 40 cents now I think
@appa609
3 жыл бұрын
The comment section is full of Americans and Indians cheering literally anything that opposes China.
@apolloaero
3 жыл бұрын
@@appa609 We don't oppose China, we oppose the ccp. And the Chinese people suffer under it's rule more than anyone else
@ecpgieicg
3 жыл бұрын
erhh, every time I scroll down I see the opposite...
@thomaszhang3101
3 жыл бұрын
This comment cannot be any more biased lol, 40% of the comments are WWII jokes and 60% are American/Indian anti-China posts.
@evilsmileyface90
3 жыл бұрын
Admiral Yamamoto as a Protoss Dragoon: I Have Returned Kamikaze pilots as Protoss Corsair: It Is A Good Day To Die
@ranni9536
3 жыл бұрын
A StarCraft reference!? Damn, I haven't heard of one in a LONG time...
@Jewel122580
3 жыл бұрын
@@ranni9536 *"Not enough minerals"*
@ranni9536
3 жыл бұрын
@@Jewel122580 *Nuclear Launch Detected*
@Jewel122580
3 жыл бұрын
@@ranni9536*"Kirov reporting"*
@ranni9536
3 жыл бұрын
@@Jewel122580 "*More work?*"
@pracylopgonzer3176
3 жыл бұрын
To be truthful Japan, specifically IJN was a very innovative pioneer in the development of aircraft carrier & carrier tactics. I am curious to see future carriers from Japan and any innovative changes they may employ once they have experience to draw upon. They are, after all a seafaring nation & intelligent & innovative. Yea I’m looking forward to see in what direction they will go with their carriers.
@18890426
3 жыл бұрын
My guess is that they will create something more innovative
@yixuanouyang7676
3 жыл бұрын
@Crus Harold Also America: Proceeds to commission over 20 carriers within 2 years
@dzakiassuhud1825
3 жыл бұрын
The designation tho, "Multi purpose Destroyer" lol
@orneryokinawan4529
3 жыл бұрын
Well in all fairness, it will destroy and kill and that's what it was made for lol
@imreallynoob8311
3 жыл бұрын
Russia call their carrier aircraft cruiser
@2710cruiser
3 жыл бұрын
I didn't know they "redesignated"
@blkmgk16
3 жыл бұрын
It's like saying creative use of game mechanics instead of using cheaty exploits
@2710cruiser
3 жыл бұрын
@@blkmgk16 How about a missile cruiser that so happens to have design provisions to support naval aviation operations... Just to pass through Bosphorus Strait XD
@Irfan87
3 жыл бұрын
Deutsche Marine be like : "Looks like the band is getting back together boisssss".
@levinaugust3331
3 жыл бұрын
Deutsche Marine is a joke nowadays
@Dinitroflurbenzol
3 жыл бұрын
@@levinaugust3331 Das ist leider SOWAS von wahr
@termitreter6545
3 жыл бұрын
@@levinaugust3331 The WW2 german navy wasnt exactly impressive either. The only thing it had going for itself was a massive Uboat-Fleet. Heck, the difference between UK and German navy might actually be smaller now than it was back in WW2, with the exception of nukes.
@liquidh6344
3 жыл бұрын
You mean the Kreigsmarine?
@michaelarmbruster586
3 жыл бұрын
Kriegs marine had a few good ones Graf spee,scharnhorst,prince Eugene and other's, and the surface raiders
@Chloe-bn8so
3 жыл бұрын
Japan: we can't make aircraft carriers so let's just make helicopter carriers. *purchases jets that are capable of virtical landing*
@alcostello6114
3 жыл бұрын
I sincerely love the Japanese. I hope they repeal article 9 so the real fun can begin.
@rms1034
3 жыл бұрын
Good. Stronger Japan is a stronger friend and Ally to the US.
@Andrew-is7rs
3 жыл бұрын
As long as Biden is not in power yes
@FireFlanker1
3 жыл бұрын
until they need resources... and some sun on a nice island
@chrisliu5581
3 жыл бұрын
The ally who got nuked twice by us
@rms1034
3 жыл бұрын
@@chrisliu5581 irrelevant. That was done decades ago when they were enemies. Different time, different Japan. Britain and US were enemies in the past aswell but now are staunch Allies. Most Japanese know the US is a huge contributor to their post war economic miracle, and is largely responsible for their regional stability and defense agaisnt destabilizes like north Korea and China.
@chrisliu5581
3 жыл бұрын
@@rms1034 so basically you really need to stop being a such biosed speaker. Yes that is decades ago, but this specific part of history contributes massively to the tension in this region, where you need to do more research really. Also yea, about that defend from north Korea and China thing, may i ask you who started most of the wars in the past 50 years? Who has most number of off shore military bases around the world? Do not tell me they were there for peace keeping you'd be childish to say that. The military budget of the USA is more than the sum of the rest of the top ten other countries. You guys simply make up an enemy, and splash all the propaganda so that the Western controlled weapon dealers could make a benefit. Don't forget you are living on a land that you earned by genocidal massacre, yea, true, that also happened few hundred years ago, but, do you really think those Dead native Americans could just forgive you? Also those kinds been dugged out from under the schools in Canada? Also in South China Sea, you are urging the countries in the region to comply with UNCLOS and USA itself did not ratify this treaty, it just sound like you are so used to be the world police so that whatever you believe are correct has to be correct.
@DUBEE43
3 жыл бұрын
Knowing the JAPANESE, that ship is IMPECCABLE......
@Corsuwey
3 жыл бұрын
Absolutely! Taiwan is a sovereign country and Xi "Pooh" JingPoop with his pathetic CCP will lose!
@DUBEE43
3 жыл бұрын
@@Corsuwey TOTALLY AGREED BROTHER
@oklahomahank2378
3 жыл бұрын
And reliable and fast, as someone who has a Toyota car and a Honda motorcycle.
@DUBEE43
3 жыл бұрын
@储有奈 Your point?? If you have one....
@DUBEE43
3 жыл бұрын
@储有奈 And I dont care what you DOUBT, so move ALONG now.....🙄
@MastermemesXD
2 жыл бұрын
Next: Japan self defense force built space battleship Yamato
@looinrims
2 жыл бұрын
Multipurpose weapons carrier****
@JariahxSynn
2 жыл бұрын
I kinda want that...
@sq_rabbit6310
2 жыл бұрын
The end of the world
@赵亮-m9y
2 жыл бұрын
Kaga is back!
@falco5429
2 жыл бұрын
Kaga 2
@titanx8199
3 жыл бұрын
China: tries to dominate the world Germany, Italy and Japan : Guys we are getting the Team back together
@hansthegermansoldier7550
3 жыл бұрын
Russia: just like old times
@kurtlianddemesa6028
3 жыл бұрын
Poland: **Crying** Pls... Don't bully me...
@hansthegermansoldier7550
3 жыл бұрын
France: ah shit here we go again
@어우야-i2v
3 жыл бұрын
S.korea : We only watch Japan
@fluffyseal8782
3 жыл бұрын
Russia and China: Cute
@DoubleBourbonBaconCheeseBurger
3 жыл бұрын
A fine addition to that anime about military planes and ships as anime girls
@noahnoah2747
3 жыл бұрын
the aeromorphist conspiracy strikes again
@brainletmong6302
3 жыл бұрын
Which of the 7 kansen animes on the market are you talking about? Or the 3 upcoming ones? Or is it part of the 21 spinoffs or the 78 non-animated game only kansen ones? The market clearly isn't oversaturated enough.
@euaf-crimson1730
3 жыл бұрын
He knows too much.
@tavernburner3066
3 жыл бұрын
sadly none of them include ships not from ww2.
@SGT676
3 жыл бұрын
Azurlane?
@mattblom3990
3 жыл бұрын
The Izumos were always meant to be converted to true carriers and naval enthusiasts knew this from the beginning. Japan was ensuring they had the design and tech knowhow to maintain fleet carrier capabilities.
@rodfel2001
3 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately for them Carriers have become obsolete and they will be the very first "juicy targets" once everyone will come to blow ... You can display all the aegis system in the world in order to repulse a swarm of incoming missiles, but one single sub can wreck havoc your fleet. Why? Because there is something call THE SOFT UNDERBELLY, and it is the attack subs that will fight to the death in order to send it to the bottom. And until you do not develop a real effective under water radar that will be able to detect deeply submerged subs, there is nothing you can do to protect your sea cuffins from the underwater cruise missiles and the 200 miles per hour speedy torpedoes ... Don't send our kids to the Navy : They'd be dead after boarding ...
@Funica11
3 жыл бұрын
That's the only method to cheat the eyes of USA/UK, China, Russia that are forcing us to abandon our armed force.
@paulbedichek2679
3 жыл бұрын
@@rodfel2001 The US controls all the worlds oceans ,especially in submarine warfare ,we track every sub of theirs every time and they never track a submarine of ours ever, add in UK and Aus. Now the Chinese do have credible threats to carriers , their land based missiles, that is why in times of conflict the carriers stand off from shore by some distance. Good for the Japanese to assume some responsibility,they are a maritime nation and need a strong navy, it doesn't hurt they work closely with the Us,UK,Aus and many others,remem when the Chinese built up a reef and fortified it? The Japanese have hundreds of much bigger islands ,big enough for air strips and they work with the US to fortify ones that cause the most consternation to China. Lots of other nations I didn't mention Indonesia,Maylasia ,Phillipenes all unite to counter naval threats by China which has poor relations with every country it borders, even Russia.
@rodfel2001
3 жыл бұрын
@@paulbedichek2679 The US knows how to track submarine so well that the Swede had managed to score several direct hits on one of their super carriers, and the strawberry on the sundae : a chinese sub did surface in the middle of a full US naval drill ... isn't it pathetic to contemplate how delusional we have become about our armed forces, even though we've had had our share of defeat for the last sixty years? Since when have we won a war just by ourselves against a major foe? ...
@iamasmurf1122
3 жыл бұрын
@@rodfel2001 actually its Australia that tracks submarines for the U.S , pine gap in the middle of Australia is what that is , without Australias pine GAP the U.S wouldnt know squat , and the reason is geographically Australia how it is with its low cloud formation makes it the best country in the world for doing this
@wyattbedard2194
3 жыл бұрын
Everybody gangsta until it’s spotted heading for Midway....
@Pikkabuu
3 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't that be Hawaii first?
@myreactiontothatinformatio6344
3 жыл бұрын
Nah pearl harbor will be the first then nuke
@blueduck9409
3 жыл бұрын
I am glad to see it. Over the decades, Japan has become a trusted and respected friend to the United States. Its time Japan has its own air craft carriers. I hope it worries China.
@andrewtaylor940
3 жыл бұрын
Now now, we all know these are not “Aircraft Carriers” they are “Helicopter equipped Destroyers”.
@jerichothirteen1134
3 жыл бұрын
Still more of a carrier than the Chinese ones I reckon.
@jamesnewcomer4939
3 жыл бұрын
'Helicopter equipped destroyers' equipped with jet fighters!
@greybirdo
3 жыл бұрын
The Brits did the same thing with the Invincible class, calling them 'Through Deck Cruisers' when Aircraft Carriers were in bad odour in the UK in the late 1970's.
@PhoenixT70
3 жыл бұрын
That operate V/STOL jets.
@PhoenixT70
3 жыл бұрын
@@jerichothirteen1134 The _Liaoning_ can launch Shipwreck antiship missiles and operates conventional aircraft rather than V/STOL. _Kaga_ is meant to be a pocket carrier.
@slimeydon
3 жыл бұрын
As long as they don’t cruise to Oahu in December and transmit Climb Mount Niitaka on a Sunday morning we’re good.
@P4Tri0t420
3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@royhuang9715
3 жыл бұрын
That for sure won’t happen. Cause now US fleet is based in Japan. So the first target will be US 7th fleet docked at Yokosuka and Sasebo.
@rohitkothari3890
3 жыл бұрын
Even if that happens, its fine. World war 2 is practically what made us the king of the world. We benefited the most from it than any other Nation. If Japan hadn't dragged us into the war, world would be a different place and much worse.
@JoeBLOWFHB
3 жыл бұрын
Nah... we're good Hiroshima would come A LOT earlier in this war and it would keep coming.
@rcgunner7086
3 жыл бұрын
I think they're more worried about events in the South China Sea and closer to home.
@weirdstuff_tm8942
3 жыл бұрын
the second carrier is called "Kaga"... They are really going for the nostalgia factor, huh
@shinkicker404
3 жыл бұрын
Wait until they bust out Akagi as well.
@britishpersonwholikesgerma908
3 жыл бұрын
@@shinkicker404 And then Amagi comes along right after Akagi and even manages to become the same class as Akagi as they would've been in the 1920s
@Shiny49GER
3 жыл бұрын
As a German I also wished our Government would've spent the money wasted for the new Berlin Airport onto an Aircraft Carrier called "Graf Zeppelin II" for our intimidating fleet of 4 combat ready Eurofighters in total. Would probably had lower costs and more use than the airport and would 've been built faster.
@PhoenixT70
3 жыл бұрын
@@Shiny49GER No offense, pal, but Germany has never had a truly first-rate navy. Why would the politicians ever want to start now? (That was sarcasm, by the way, I would love to see a German first-rate navy)
@StreamSonic
3 жыл бұрын
Summarized "Kancolle" in a nutshell.
@pinecone3334
3 жыл бұрын
And it’s American Planes and the Japanese Navy // Coming together at last!
@joeyphaahla
3 жыл бұрын
They’ve been allies for yrs
@pinecone3334
3 жыл бұрын
@@joeyphaahla I think you missed the reference, my friend
@dm9078
3 жыл бұрын
Coming together again. Just differently 😉
@FreedomDefender07
3 жыл бұрын
"... and the biggest difference between the Izumo carrier and the Wasp carrier is that the Izumo can transform into a giant robot."
@stevej3483
3 жыл бұрын
Hai! So desu!
@coltinyancey6420
3 жыл бұрын
We could see a Wasp and Kaga operating the same aircraft. What a world we live in.
@tommyhunter1817
3 жыл бұрын
And by probably sailing together.
@andrewfischer8564
3 жыл бұрын
@opisex i believe hes noting a historical irony. as their name sakes faced off in ww2
@coltinyancey6420
3 жыл бұрын
@@andrewfischer8564 exactly, was admiring the irony for youtubes algorithm. Didnt expect any responses on the comment
@coltinyancey6420
3 жыл бұрын
@opisex tis all good, im the opposite. I have a stronger grasp of historical events than modern navies. I would have said Enterprise, but i dont actually know offhand if there is a currently commissioned Enterprise.
@Spymaster001
3 жыл бұрын
@@coltinyancey6420 I think there is
@VersusARCH
3 жыл бұрын
"The Japanese Navy got their first aircraft carrier since WW2 on December 5th." ... I suspect that date was chosen because she could sail from Tokyo to within a striking distance of Oahu in 2 days...
@leprechaunbutreallyjustamidget
3 жыл бұрын
Oh no my boats!
@hauuau
3 жыл бұрын
But it's October now. Where that "December" thing is even coming from?
@MAKO_192
3 жыл бұрын
@@hauuau 2020 probably? But 76 years from the end of WW2. I think there is a mistake.
@gorilladisco9108
3 жыл бұрын
Damn plot twist.
@powderskier5547
3 жыл бұрын
One thing I know for sure is Australia has Japan's back and Japan has Australia's back
@hackman669
3 жыл бұрын
@Phil Smiley Nguyen Let the games begin!!! S Asian Nato vs Red Army!!!
@SG003
3 жыл бұрын
They're calling a sword a kitchen knife
@jonathanmichaelsmith9012
3 жыл бұрын
This is great.
@jefferyindorf699
3 жыл бұрын
A VERY large kitchen knife .
@Joseph-yh8gn
3 жыл бұрын
Google "Japanese tuna knife", thing's basically a katana
@JYF921
3 жыл бұрын
Binkov, you should move your "only peace brings us all together" statements to the beginning, everyone needs such a reminder right now
@MrBurns-tf4if
3 жыл бұрын
We are past that point. You need to get ready for what is coming. We cannot control it now, but we can prepare as much as possible.
@binsarr9761
3 жыл бұрын
that statement is obselete,if we kept peace the other faction will use that time to make more influnce.
@markdexterespino5480
3 жыл бұрын
Well peace are fought for evident during the course of our history.
@k00lkidz4
3 жыл бұрын
no
@lamalien2276
3 жыл бұрын
I'm getting really sick of everyone acting like a pansy. Logically speaking, you should avoid destructive and unproductive conflict. But when conflict comes, or you are tasked with being the one to crush your nation's enemies, it doesn't instill confidence to blubber like a baby. Sure, you get brownie points for being a good little boy and regurgitating politically correct talking points, but what good is all your hip swiveling when the shtf? I wish men would just act like men again and not like overdomesticated simpering puppies.
@jonathanryan9946
3 жыл бұрын
Oh come on, we all know the planes are just temporary until they get their Gundams built.
@edwardcardozo8325
3 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah
@Riverbed_Dreaming
2 жыл бұрын
‘See, it’s not an aircraft carrier because we named it a destroyer’
@DivusMagus
3 жыл бұрын
Encouraging to see allies growing in strength. The best thing to prevent war is to make peace cheaper then the price of war.
@xirensixseo
3 жыл бұрын
i wonder when they'll name a capital ship Echigo, after the province held by the Uesugi clan during the Sengoku period. It would be pretty fitting for the Japanese Self-Defense Force to have a large ship named as such, since all the Uesugi wanted was to be left alone and at peace
@johnbui6530
3 жыл бұрын
Wait until Ichigo releases his bankai.
@JC-uz3ey
3 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting for Yamato II, Musashi II...
@xirensixseo
3 жыл бұрын
yall are weebs
@tritium1998
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah well the Western colonialists helped the Emperor take over the whole archipelago by wiping out the shoguns and samurai.
@johnbui6530
3 жыл бұрын
@@tritium1998 What does that have to do with Ichigo's bankai?
@tommyhunter1817
3 жыл бұрын
US Marines landing on Japanese carriers. Friggin’ awesome.
@Wargunsfan
3 жыл бұрын
Now I've seen it all. Nimitz must be rolling over in his grave.
@tommyhunter1817
3 жыл бұрын
@@Wargunsfan Better than the other way around. LOL
@sctm81
3 жыл бұрын
@@Wargunsfan in the art of war no enemy or ally is enemy or ally forever. The man was right.
@Edax_Royeaux
3 жыл бұрын
@@Wargunsfan Nimitz was an aide to an Admiral when Japan was our ally in WWI. I think he'd understand what it's like to have a Japanese ally.
@daryl4307
3 жыл бұрын
Then: Japan Kamikaze pilots landing on US carriers and destroyers.
@sharkbait6631
3 жыл бұрын
I am glad to see the Japanese navy back.the world is not as used to be. Peace and stability has to be maintain. In the Asia pacific region, the return of a Japanese military capability will keep the balance in the region.
@Wbliss
2 жыл бұрын
Not so fast, Japan can rearm itself anytime it wants, and dumb enough to make the wrong moves in that region, and it will have to contend with Russia, China, both Koreans which it knows would be all over her islands. The US is just using Japan as a buffer which it could manipulate easily as Japan cannot make any moves without looking over its shoulders to see if the master is really behind it.
@vandrosia
2 жыл бұрын
@@Wbliss Great analysis, Einstein.
@patrickcloutier6801
3 жыл бұрын
Production of Japanese aircraft carriers is a step in the right direction. China was probably the first threat the Japanese had in mind, when planning construction. Ironically, with China throwing its weight around the Pacific Ocean and beyond, the US and Australia seem to have more confidence about Japanese possession of aircraft carriers, than the Japanese themselves do.
@qr8440
3 жыл бұрын
Aye, as an Aussie I second this notion. An apt description Patrick.
@kmk8168
3 жыл бұрын
I just wish they wouldn't use it to enforce their absurd claims to Korean and Russian islands
@pepleatherlab3872
3 жыл бұрын
I think they're just leery of overstimulating the Budo fighting spirit of Japan. It didn't turn out so well last time. Sadly, it'll probably become necessary regardless.
@steviesevieria1868
3 жыл бұрын
@@qr8440 it’s also time to better arm Taiwan.
@kaijuslayer3334
3 жыл бұрын
Japan: *launches the Izumo as a aircraft carrier* Also Japan: “But wait! There’s more!” *launches the Kaga as a aircraft carrier*
@jackjones3657
3 жыл бұрын
The days of WW2 are long over, with a completely different political and national environment in Japan. They now need a very robust and up-to-date military to keep the very aggressive bully tactics of Ch!na in check.
@nickriley4609
3 жыл бұрын
Japan should have whatever it want in a military...though I'd understand if them not wanting a nuke...however many Japanese have considered acquiring nuclear weapons..not as many as us and Russia but within reason...depends on the need or want as they are expensive and dangerous to store/maintain readiness of..overall this is a good achievement and step in they right direction for a modern japan givin aggressive china 👍🇯🇵
@whitekingbleach9720
3 жыл бұрын
They started modernization since 2014, that isn't a long time relatively...
@ErraticFaith
3 жыл бұрын
Don't be deceived. Our defence force is vastly capable and honored to serve friendship with 7th US. Together we will achieve success. I have no doubt of it.
@yiuhhsinggou3666
2 жыл бұрын
This time, it is a force what helps defending freedom and democracy.
@dextercochran4916
3 жыл бұрын
US: Would you sail to the ends of the earth and beyond to fetch back peace and stability and our precious freedom? UK: Aye! Australia: Aye! US: If you would brave the weird and haunted shores in red China, you will need a navy who knows those waters.... Japan: *So tell me, what's become of my ships?* 😈
@the_legendary_vin
3 жыл бұрын
Lol
@LoremasterYnTaris
3 жыл бұрын
I love this so much.
@tritium1998
3 жыл бұрын
Your freedom ended up in China?
@walden6272
3 жыл бұрын
So you have Joe Biden, Boris Johnson, and Scott Morrison vs Xi and Putin That's like Three Stooges vs Goku and Vegeta. LOL
@Deno2100
3 жыл бұрын
@@tritium1998 The US is always losing it freedom. Then they have to go back and fetch it with their military industrial complex. Its a bizarre phenomenon.
@nomad9563
3 жыл бұрын
Glad to see Japan making moves to protect it's people and sovereignty.
@Agent_Riot-2000
3 жыл бұрын
One important thing to remind here: The project once known before 2011 as 22DDH, was conceived as an evolution from the previous class of helicopter carriers, the Hyuga-class (Hyuga and Ise). Officially at least, there were no plans for F-35Bs, and the most possible acquisition for it were the Ospreys. But the overall design was done taking into consideration that, in case F-35Bs were purchased, the carrier would need only some modifications. In the meantime, it would focus heavily on anti-submarine warfare, as well as other related operations. Compared to other comparable American carriers, this class was not built for amphibious operations. So in fact, it is some sort of carrier that was built not to be deployed abroad (because of constitutional limitations), but to secure the surroundings of Japan, and adyacent "seas of interest". If Japan were to build a full-fledged AC, it would first need to overcome sluggish constitutional discussions. Of course, we are no longer in 2012, but public opinion will be key for that to happen one day.
@henrybancroft9039
3 жыл бұрын
I like to see a fellow expert. :)
@termitreter6545
3 жыл бұрын
It does make you feel like this was planned all along, though.
@randomka-52alligatorthatis34
3 жыл бұрын
Aircraft Carrier? No, no, no, my dude. That's not an Aircraft Carrier! Not at all! It's a Multipurpose Destroyer, that's what it is! \s (For Context, Japan can't operate Aircraft Carriers due to their Constitution that was made after WW2 for obvious reasons. They are only allowed to have Defensive Weapons. ACs are considered Offensive Weapons and in order for them to get that they need to change their Constitution as OP has pointed out.)
@jimrobinson6478
3 жыл бұрын
Too bad The Imperial Japanese Navy lost at Midway.
@Agent_Riot-2000
3 жыл бұрын
@@randomka-52alligatorthatis34 I know about the constitutional matters. But even if it's not the case, Japan would doubtly need such a full-fledged carrier. Once the Izumo-class modifications are completed, and possibly new ones were to be added (a prospect, nothing announced by now), they are more than enough to defend Japan. Unless Japan is worried about the need to defend interest all the way to Africa and the Americas, there's no need for it. A dispersed carrier force it is better suited for them, without much costs. But who knows, things may change sooner than expected
@privatebandana
2 жыл бұрын
Japan casually building its own aircraft carrier with ease while Russia and China are struggling with it, lol.
@bombarderoazul
2 жыл бұрын
China doing well actually, and their carrier is 3 times bigger than Izumo.
@privatebandana
2 жыл бұрын
@@bombarderoazul You mean the steam powered carrier with a ramp? Whew, impressive.
@bombarderoazul
2 жыл бұрын
@@privatebandana no, their type 003, which should enter service next year, it's about 85,000 tons, and yes they have older Russian one,, which is well maintained And a newer copy, 002, which is new at least.
@altergreenhorn
2 жыл бұрын
@@privatebandana All of the US carriers are steam powered! Your point is what?
Maybe they'll make a Heavy Aircraft Cruiser, as the Soviets said to pass through the Bosphorus in Turkey
@thekraken1173
3 жыл бұрын
Good
@anarchyandempires5452
3 жыл бұрын
30 carriers boys, the allies now have 30 freaking carriers!! Hoorah baby!!! By the way it's freaking crazy that the Kaga, Queen Elizabeth and Enterprise are all going to be fighting on the same side, it's like real world Naval fanfiction right here!! The fox Girl, the Young queen, and the deadly huntress, the 3 super rare girls!!!
@oldkid8811
3 жыл бұрын
we need them. The battle of Hainan is going to be HUGE!
@Top_Weeb
3 жыл бұрын
It's so weird to cheer on war like it's a game. It's not.
@anarchyandempires5452
3 жыл бұрын
@@Top_Weeb we don't chear the war, we chear for our victory.
@KimJungDwayne
3 жыл бұрын
Crazy thing about this is that this carrier along with its strike group is with 2 US carrier strike groups and 1 UK carrier strike group off the coast of taiwan right now
@JosePineda-cy6om
3 жыл бұрын
Not just that. Japan built a military base in an island of the ryukyu archipielago, some 800km southwest of okinawa, like 200km northeast of taiwan. The Taiwanese were *delighted* by this! They know japan would come to the rescue if CCP invades
@victorcharlie5054
3 жыл бұрын
@@JosePineda-cy6om partnered with the news that us troops have been training on Taiwanese soil which the Chinese said would be the red line to war It’s getting hot in here
@tritium1998
3 жыл бұрын
@@JosePineda-cy6om Plenty of Taiwanese also hate the separatists and the obvious overseas enemies of China though. Does Japan really want what happened last time with the same flag and lose more islands as compensation?
@JosePineda-cy6om
3 жыл бұрын
@@tritium1998 Dude, Japan's there to stop the CCP from rolling over the island. They'll not try to take Taiwan back as part of a renewed empire. Why should they? Public perception of Japan is highest in Taiwan among all other East Asian countries. Taiwan and Japan do plenty of commerce and tourism with each other. What would they gain from trying to annex Taiwan? Nothing, and they'd lose a lot. The military base is there against a mainland invasion. That's it. That's all there is to it.
@KimJungDwayne
3 жыл бұрын
@@victorcharlie5054 really hot i expect armed conflict imminently. Taiwan sent out S.O.S to all countries to help
@franktaddie2325
3 жыл бұрын
Good to see the Japanese navy on a come back and this time they are on our side.
@RobGM2
3 жыл бұрын
Their carriers are super clean. As a Navy guy, I would have wanted my ship to have been that clean. Their deck division must be damn good!!!
@orneryokinawan4529
3 жыл бұрын
Unlike you slobs, we are like this back home toom
@nimay13
3 жыл бұрын
It's new, of course it's clean. Give it time. Heh.
@Averageyoutubeenjoyerr
3 жыл бұрын
@@orneryokinawan4529 that's rude
@revivrevalchn3503
3 жыл бұрын
It's japanese's, what do you expect.
@lars1701again
3 жыл бұрын
@@orneryokinawan4529 Yeah but as it was proven in WW2 you cant win a war. So would you rather have a clean ship and lose naval wars or be a bit sloppy and win them?
@clivedoe9674
3 жыл бұрын
As an American, seeing all our Allies getting these new weapons makes me feel a little safer.
@SCH292
3 жыл бұрын
Just like the Taliban. Lol
@clivedoe9674
3 жыл бұрын
@@SCH292 I doubt the UK, Australia, or Japan are going to collapse into anarchy any time soon.
@sisyphusvasilias3943
3 жыл бұрын
The lack of self awareness is breathtaking
@世界莫慌南波灣來了
3 жыл бұрын
funny give them nuke
@USSAnimeNCC-
3 жыл бұрын
Except the ones who live in area the are in tension that stuff is basically next door I don't think Japanese, Korean, NK and Chinese that aren't into the propaganda, form taiwanese to Philippines feel safer being around nation playing a deadly game of chicken doesn't matter if the weapons are old or new nobody is going to be happy with WWIII
@renaissancenovice7202
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it's time to let Japan off the leash to remilitarize. It'd be really handy right now to have a noteworthy friendly military in the area.
@Astorath_the_Grim
3 жыл бұрын
Damn I've made this exact comment before. Great minds think alike.
@kevinw2592
3 жыл бұрын
they're not on a leash. They wrote into their constitution to cap military spending.
@paulbedichek2679
3 жыл бұрын
Go nuclear. We want a strong friend.
@hackman669
3 жыл бұрын
@@paulbedichek2679 The French might have a few extra subs they could lend you.
@エカチェリーナ2世-z6o
3 жыл бұрын
I'm very happy because this comment section is positive to Japan. In Japan, there are many people they want to disarm Japan and stop defend . One of the woman in Japanese parliament once said " I was born in China and now I am Japanese but my spirit belong to China. I want to contribute China." I never thought all Chinese people are bad. I hope good guy change China and Japan and China become friendly. Sorry for my poor English.
@Deaglan753
3 жыл бұрын
All good mate we got your back this time togerther for victory
@rodfel2001
3 жыл бұрын
Japan should be prepared to join the BELT AND ROAD initiated by China, for sooner or later, Asia will replace the United States and Europe as the largest economic bloc on the planet surface. Japan should draw a lesson from the nuclear attack it ruthlessly was the victim, and advise the US to try to compete instead of trying to bring the world down with it. The US can still compete and rule the world if it stops behaving like a bully and rather helps heal all the evil it has done. The problem is that the US can't compete anymore, and it's losing ground so fast that in two decades it risks to be downgraded to a third world country. The US must follow the rules that tells it to lean the fat of corruption and find your economic and financial health back otherwise, be eaten from the inside out by your own population ... you know, when the body is starving, it eats itself ... and now the US population is starving ...
@rodfel2001
3 жыл бұрын
I don't think so ...
@notdolandark
3 жыл бұрын
You don’t need to taking in English anymore KZitem will translate you’re words for you
@エカチェリーナ2世-z6o
3 жыл бұрын
@@notdolandark yeah I know but I want to talk with my own word, not the translate
@fritzstudios8571
3 жыл бұрын
Japanese Admiral: "Midway is a thorn in our side..., Oh I meant Beijing", sorry sorry old habits"
@pac1fic055
3 жыл бұрын
Next: Akagi, Hiryu, Soryu.
@companyman4713
3 жыл бұрын
Zuikaku and Shokaku after that.
@elykeom1
3 жыл бұрын
Zuiho and Shoho next!
@Willzy800
3 жыл бұрын
Kido Butai!
@ibnu9969
3 жыл бұрын
Me waiting for a completed Shinano
@Ozraptor4
3 жыл бұрын
Soryu already exists in the JMSDF as an attack submarine.
@andrewsmall6834
3 жыл бұрын
This will be the same with the Australian navy, our Canberra class light carriers could EASILY be made to carry the F35B.
@jecos1966
3 жыл бұрын
Those ships are not heated resistant
@mikeneufield2855
3 жыл бұрын
true yes ,werent they , your navy or govt talking about altering the Canberras for that ? I wish Canada would get something like that , an LHD type platform .we could with a bit more or some effort , but the liberals dont like spending that kind of money on defense, and make it hard even when the Conservatives are in power .. * smh
@GM-fh5jp
3 жыл бұрын
@@jecos1966 neither were the Izumo class until their recent refit to harden the decks for F35 operations. Canberras could (and SHOULD) undergo the same refit ASAP.
@barrylinkiewich9688
3 жыл бұрын
@@mikeneufield2855 We could really use a couple ships to augment our current military's main focus of peace keeping and disaster relief. And a helicopter carrier would fit that role very well, we use helicopters for both peace keeping and disaster relieving and the helicopters would really need an escort in hostile airspace so a few F-35s would suit.
@andrewsmall6834
3 жыл бұрын
@@jecos1966 All of the issues have been assessed and both the Canberra class LHDs could be reconfigured to carry VTOL aircraft and it would not cost a vast amount and it would not effect the ships capability much at all. If you would like to see a full break down, there is a video doing just that on the channel hypohystericalhistory
@aceofspadesguy4913
3 жыл бұрын
“Guess who’s back”
@not_hAck3r
3 жыл бұрын
Kamikaze
@Idahoguy10157
3 жыл бұрын
It going to be surreal when the Kaga goes into Pearl Harbor with it’s F-35’s! Admiral Nimitz may roll over in his grave
@edding8400
3 жыл бұрын
Or....he's smiling down from the heavens with great pride.
@GM-fh5jp
3 жыл бұрын
Admiral Yamamoto studied extensively in the United States as a younger man. I'm sure he would be looking down and smiling with quiet satisfaction and approval.
@Idahoguy10157
3 жыл бұрын
@@GM-fh5jp …. I concur on your opinion
@nickthenuker7916
3 жыл бұрын
@@GM-fh5jp he also didn’t really want a war (or at least a protracted Total War) with the US, so seeing them now as allies would also be fitting
@Edax_Royeaux
3 жыл бұрын
Admiral Nimitz was an Admiral during WWI when Japan was our ally. I think he'd understand the concept of an alliance.
@russiansoldier7938
3 жыл бұрын
Japan names one of the carriers “ Kaga “ Very interesting
@tonysu8860
3 жыл бұрын
It's not the only WWII carrier name repurposed for modern vessels... Do a search on the other carrier names, you'll find several.
@Edax_Royeaux
3 жыл бұрын
Kaga is a province. It's like the US naming a ship USS Marine, doesn't mean we're trying to invade Cuba again.
@hgbugalou
3 жыл бұрын
It is amazing to me we went from surprise attacks, killing each other by the thousands in the cruelest ways, and nuclear holocaust to Japan allowing US planes to land on her ships. We are now two of the closest allies on the planet. It took a very long time, but other countries have fought longer for much less. I think mutual respect was gained on both sides post WW2 and we found out our two countries aren't so different. I am glad to have Japan as an ally to the US now.
@rapidsqualor5367
3 жыл бұрын
Like US, they are motivated by their freedom. Like US, they want to help Taiwan.
@Sandhill1988
3 жыл бұрын
@@rapidsqualor5367 And help Taiwan we must!
@willrobinson9767
3 жыл бұрын
They are useless just like Taiwan....
@richardscathouse
3 жыл бұрын
What ally? Japan is an occupied vassal
@richardscathouse
3 жыл бұрын
@@rapidsqualor5367 What freedom?
@castleromeo3150
3 жыл бұрын
The boys are back in town
@FlyxPat
3 жыл бұрын
The UK just completed two fleet carriers. Australia and others have LHDs that could be converted to light carriers. At this rate America's allies will be building carriers faster than the CCP. I do wonder how Chinese crews will go up against American and allied ones. Allied forces have a couple of centuries of naval tradition and experience and decades of refining carrier ops while the Chinese have none. I suspect it will be like the French and Spanish trying to fight the British in the Napoleonic wars. The other thing it reminds of is the dreadnought race between Britain and Germany. All the money for those German ships turned out to be pretty much wasted.
@alexanderzippel8809
3 жыл бұрын
Who says China uses its Carriers. Sweden already has near undetectable Subs. Only a matter of time until China will utilize this and use German WW2 tactics. Submarines, even now with better Sonar/Radardefences are dangerous
@FlyxPat
3 жыл бұрын
The CCP is welcome not to use its carriers. All that money is wasted then. As for subs, the West has more, and better. The CCP's old ones are almost useless. HMS QE detected them on its recent trip.
@alexanderzippel8809
3 жыл бұрын
@@FlyxPat Cool that the Brits detected them. The US did not. And China will probably use its Carriers AFTER the Subs have Bernd destroyed or have achieved somewhat of Navaldominance
@FlyxPat
3 жыл бұрын
Not for a couple of decades yet. Maybe after 2050.
@joshuabonilla3491
3 жыл бұрын
Carriers aren’t the end all , they are very expensive to maintain and repair. China has air bases on land cheaper then a carrier and can hold more planes. That’s even if a war even happens. Far as we know people are just wasting more money.
@TheQuarterrat
3 жыл бұрын
The Japanese should have waited 2 days more before commissioning it.
@markmierzejewski9534
3 жыл бұрын
@Omar Khurshid Taiwan independence day.
@TheQuarterrat
3 жыл бұрын
@Omar Khurshid They commissioned it on December 5th...
@andraslibal
3 жыл бұрын
That would have been something :))))
@EroPantherH
3 жыл бұрын
What do you mean carrier? They're -helicopter- multi-purpose destroyers damnit!
@gwydionrusso3206
3 жыл бұрын
To be fair the designation for Carrier (CV) does translate to something along the lines of fly cruiser or flying cruiser so a light carrier would be a fly destroyer or flying destroyer
@termitreter6545
3 жыл бұрын
@@gwydionrusso3206 Man, the Fly Swatter has come a long way!
@OperationEndGame
10 ай бұрын
I guarantee Japan will be building a larger CV as a follow-up to the Izumo class
@HIHIHJIHIHIH
3 жыл бұрын
You know we need a Remilitarized Japan and a Unified EU ARMY/ Hey Germany pour more money in military please... I just hope the Italian's won't suddenly switch sides again lol
@kmk8168
3 жыл бұрын
South Korea with nuclear ICBMs, problem solved
@steviesevieria1868
3 жыл бұрын
@@kmk8168 also Taiwan
@steviesevieria1868
3 жыл бұрын
@@kmk8168 except they just need to be short range, not intercontinental. Just enough to reach the main areas of China and N Korea.
@weishi9804
2 жыл бұрын
@@kmk8168 soul will be toasted, forget what happened between 1961 to 1962.
@Hubba404
3 жыл бұрын
Japan: “Why are you talking about carriers, these are destroyers with benefits!”
@westrim
3 жыл бұрын
They like them flatt.
@fishpilotgaming1591
3 жыл бұрын
It's about damn time. Now build more
@Sandhill1988
3 жыл бұрын
First crush China.
@britishneko3906
3 жыл бұрын
@@Sandhill1988 next make Yamato class and super Yamato class super battleships
@waterpann
2 жыл бұрын
no wonder why i keep getting modern carrier image when trying to search for the "kaga aircraft carrier"
@normanarmslave5144
3 жыл бұрын
If Japan decides to build a literal aircraft carrier, then thats the real deal
@HiyoruMikiyazoya
3 жыл бұрын
*glares in kamikaze*
@normanarmslave5144
3 жыл бұрын
@@HiyoruMikiyazoya well... the origin of the kamikaze came from the IJA air wing. and theyre known to be the most radical in the IJ military so...
@jarrodskufcagaming5203
3 жыл бұрын
@@normanarmslave5144 so you confuse the JSDF with the IJA. you atr stupid
@voidperception
3 жыл бұрын
@@jarrodskufcagaming5203 chill the fuck out man. he said "if"
@normanarmslave5144
3 жыл бұрын
@@jarrodskufcagaming5203 uhmmm wut?
@rodrigodiazelcid697
3 жыл бұрын
Kaga ,Hiryu ,Soryu loading..... The kidobutai is back
@streetcat3411
3 жыл бұрын
China is awakening Godzilla, who has been sleeping for 76 years...
@FRFFW
3 жыл бұрын
Under the pacific sea ofc
@fluffyseal8782
3 жыл бұрын
Godzilla? China will slap em right and Russia will slap em left
@ErraticFaith
3 жыл бұрын
You assume Russia will back China. Hmm. An interesting if somewhat misguided impression.
@Chicken_cocknballsoup7376
3 жыл бұрын
@@fluffyseal8782 ironically, Japan has defeated them both before. Without a doubt, Japan will be a major player in the war
@davehill5764
2 жыл бұрын
@@fluffyseal8782 Both China and Russia are hugely ambitious nations with gigantic war machines. I’m sure (given time) they will see each other as potential competitors more than they will see Japan as such.
@liesdamnlies3372
3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes. “It’s just in case Americans need somewhere to land…don’t mind the hangar and F-35s we’re getting for ourselves. Totally unrelated.”
@early7strikeland996
2 жыл бұрын
Everyone is gangsta until Japan started hiring pilots
@Emilechen
2 жыл бұрын
and then Tokyo get boombed by Chinese bombers and hypersonic miasiles,
@mitchi8638
2 жыл бұрын
@@Emilechen Then China will be crushed by America. Happily ever after.
@emintey
3 жыл бұрын
The worlds first 27,000 ton destroyers.
@thorin1045
3 жыл бұрын
well, if they keep the no cv policy, we could end up with a 40K+ ton destroyer, or even a nuclear destroyer nearly 100K ton, hope they at least will be willing to name those star destroyers or something similar :P
@starsilverinfinity
3 жыл бұрын
@@thorin1045 wave destroyers? star doesnt quite fit
@syqjaky1196
3 жыл бұрын
Remember ,There is not Japanese Navy ,Only now Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force
@Mikearoniandcheese
3 жыл бұрын
And the Japanese Coast Guard for defensive purposes.
@wilsoncortes1562
3 жыл бұрын
I got a lot of respect for Japanese people they got a great democracy great people
Пікірлер: 7 М.