Yes, bredren! Many of us don't know and reject Christianity as "a conquerors religion" and go back to the God's of kemet. But it was never God's intention
@judithdouglasbey5444
9 ай бұрын
❤❤❤I carry my book of Enoch everywhere I go.....
@user-rl7by8pr7h
8 ай бұрын
I have three books to total everything that is said to be in the Ethiopian Bible, but when I just heard a mere 30 minutes ago that Christianity began in Africa/Ethiopia I didn’t need anyone to convince me the truth of it, it just makes sense. When I informed my son, who I thought wouldn’t believe it, he also believed it without question!
@johntait5141
2 ай бұрын
G'eez - oldest language. Area of Kenya, present day Ethiopia, Eritrea - the garden. Tafari- descendant of David and Menelik Those derogatorily called Falashas- of the tribe of Dan. The works of the creator - earth and all the animals, plants, ocean, etc- Truly next level, which it why it makes sense when one says humble thyself. Give thanks
@jordanlionofjudah3904
9 ай бұрын
Ethiopian Bible rules 📣 the original bible think about it - Like the original Porsche - like the original Chuck Berry - like the first of anything means it's the most valuable the purest form the most sought after - like the original Apple Computer - it's the first Cadillac or the first Gibson guitar you get the idea Jesus is christ and the Ethiopian bible is the closest representation of his works.
@shirlspark_stardust
9 ай бұрын
Good evening Brothers Great Owl and High Priest Tafari perfected love in our Father God His son Yahusha Ha'Mashyach and the Holy Spirit 💚💛❤😊🙌🏾
@MichaelBnothere
7 ай бұрын
I just discovered this channel and I aam so glad that I did.
@sonyafoster8337
9 ай бұрын
You're right my brothers,I know that the bible was tampered with.
@donfrancis956
8 ай бұрын
Yo , you two are the true meaning of rastafari,fi real much respect always.
@abdonmanuelmartinezmartine7217
9 ай бұрын
Christianity was in Ethiopia and many people practiced it but it was not the State's Religion until the 5th Century with Ras Ezanas who had received a preaching from an Egyptian Orthodox missionary while Rome was over Egypt at that time.
@sugerlipsxjamiewright4170
8 ай бұрын
I feel that it is important too stress That the bible is a gide in the sense that each holy book teaches that it is our actions that best repsent us how we treat one another that is what counts . I believe that.
@randyvaughn8810
3 ай бұрын
Totally agree. We blame God no matter what WE do down here.
@donfrancis956
8 ай бұрын
The wisdom and the teachings you two guys give us is true and real,jah- maker (Jamaica).
@raspin263
8 ай бұрын
May Yashua and YAHWEH bless you both for bringing forth the truth to our Rasta people. Those who worship man will only inherit the spirit of man Those who worship Yah will inherit the spirit of YAHWEH creator!❤ Perfect Love ❤
@twinpyramid5985
9 ай бұрын
Blessing brothers Jerome and Ramon, 💯🔥🔥🔥Perfect ❤Love
@babarazamsucks
7 ай бұрын
I found out about this Bible just now myself. Uploaded a month after this was uploaded coincidentally so not too long ago.
@chanteldivine565
7 ай бұрын
Praying all is well and we see anew video from you all soon!! Blessings Always!!🤗💯💯
@linkhansen5785
8 ай бұрын
PERFECT LOVE !BLESSED THE GREAT OWL AN HIGH PRIEST TAFARI GIVING THANKS AGAIN BLESS. ❤
@setaparttoserveYahauh
9 ай бұрын
I would love that prayer
@stacy-annsmall3503
9 ай бұрын
Perfect love my brother’s
@donfrancis956
8 ай бұрын
Blessings I and I ever faithful ever sure.
@abdonmanuelmartinezmartine7217
7 ай бұрын
Yes Brethren I have been Meditating on this created from the soil...Adamite God is the one also coming from the same world He created ...Eternal in His own Eternity like Elijah , Enoch, Melchezidech, Abraham it is what it has come down now too today..
@THEDOB254
5 ай бұрын
Yow ! Give thanks always. My spirits guided me to here and boom ! What a special connection to every topic. ❤️
@shirlspark_stardust
9 ай бұрын
The Ethiopian bible is the world oldest bible proven fact the Gospel started in African Acts 8verses 26-40 hallelujah 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
@christmanlotsigadspirit5583
7 ай бұрын
Respect my brothers.... I've been absent from the channel for a few weeks now.... Things are a bit hectic on my side but am still busy applying for a good job. But may Christ be with us forever.
@ARyderK
9 ай бұрын
Been waiting to learn more about this
@abdonmanuelmartinezmartine7217
8 ай бұрын
Ethiopia also influenced India the River Ganges got it's name from an Ethiopian Emperor named Ras Ganges , it is also believed this is where we got the name Ganga for herb from because it grows freely along that River, it is also a river that when people would pass away they would just let their bodies flow down the river.
@markm8904
4 ай бұрын
Yes brother hope your well 🙏🏿been while since you've posted are on another platform..
@JordanGordon8
8 ай бұрын
Perfect love 🙏
@MichaelBnothere
7 ай бұрын
Where can I find an accurate translation to study from. I am seeking more and more truth.
@athiswartbooi2817
8 ай бұрын
Thanks be to God, rich in mercy.
@ErikBlack-dy9ip
6 ай бұрын
Shalom Brothers Perfect Love 🙌💪👍💯
@abdonmanuelmartinezmartine7217
8 ай бұрын
Very interesting what you are saying about the Lord's prayer....Amharic, Arabic, Hebrew and Aramaic are all Semitic languages.
@rasjudah2106
8 ай бұрын
Praying all is well brothers. 🙏🏿 💪🏿
@nicolewilliams7594
8 ай бұрын
Hey brothers. Been a while. Hope all is well. Blessings 🙏🏾💪🏾💜
@H-youtube7
8 ай бұрын
The KJV wasn't the first English translation. Remember it's a spiritual book, not an encyclopedia or a replacement for a clean heart.
@neshiajacobs325
3 ай бұрын
How do I get an Ethiopian complete Bible? I can’t find one anywhere in the USA.
@ramthian
7 ай бұрын
Hallelujah xx❤❤😊🎉🎉🎉
@benjimabo99
8 ай бұрын
Got muh vibes
@lanleejosephine
Ай бұрын
How can I get the Ethiopian Bible?
@sbmcbaker
5 ай бұрын
#193👍. 🤓.
@peterjones6014
8 ай бұрын
Give tha is for a wonderful talk. Few things come up though I dont innerstand, I see Ethiopian bible more original version except for maybe aramaic fragments from Dead Sea scrolls , but you say Africa is adamites ? Is that a good thing? Adam and eve were cursed weren't they? Yeshua Messiac was last son of Adam , came to break that line to save from sin and create new line where we all can be inheritors of Christ ? And are you saying through Ethiopia, christianity had reached all africa, Americas and Asia before Europeans got there ?
@JohnnyJackson746
6 ай бұрын
Why did abraham leave ishmael in the wilderness ?
@rtee4086
9 ай бұрын
Yes, The Ethiopian Bible is one of the oldest complete Bible, ( How does that improve the lives of Africans around the world ? ), it was written in an ancient dead language called Ge'ez, which is no longer spoken widely, The Bible was Translated into Ge'ez sometime around the 5th to 7th centuries, it contains all the writings of the Apocrypha, that are not included in the canonical version of the Protestant Bible, it has more than 100 books, However, The Ethiopian Bible Does not have the last 12 verses of Mark's Gospel ( The first Gospel ), No resurrection appearances, There isn't a surviving original copy of any Bible, what we have are copies of copies of copies, You've mentioned the book of Acts, This book has been discredited as a work of apologetic historical fiction, Nevertheless, its author ( traditionally Luke, the author of the Gospel, Luke's wanton fabrications, including his use of Josephus to make his story seem more historically informed, and his complete rewrite of history to reverse the facts reported directly by Paul, and his overt attempts to make his books look like histories, Examples, ( Luke 1:1--4, & 2 :1--2, and 3:1--2 ), These passages pretty much establish that he is not honestly reporting the facts as he knows them, he is trying to create facts and sell them as truth, The book of Acts begins by contradicting the other Gospels, even Luke's own Gospel, by telling us After his resurrection, Jesus '' presented himself alive to them by many convincing proofs '' and that he appeared to them over the course of forty days read ( Acts 1:3 ), and that he orders them not to leave Jerusalem, because they will be baptized with the Holy Spirit '' Not many days from now '' ( Acts 1:5 ). Even though Jesus has stuck around for 40 days teaching them further about the Kingdom of God, The clueless disciples still don't get it, One day, They ask him if this is the time he will restore the kingdom to Israel, He replies that it is not for Them to know the timetable that God has set, but they will receive power once the Holy Spirit comes upon them and that They will be his witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, And to the ends of the earth. Having said this, he is lifted up before their very eyes, '' And a cloud took him out of their sight ( have you notice that none of these miraculous events ever seem to be witness by a single none believer ? ), Biblical scholars today don't take Luke's book of Acts seriously As genuine history, There are many reasons why they don't, And this is not confined to secular scholars, Though they have less qualms about saying so directly, While even Christian biblical historians ( reluctantly ) acknowledge this, while they tiptoe around the ugly fact that it is only historical fiction. Secular readers ( like myself ) don't seem to have trouble taking most of Acts with a grain of salt, To start with, There are plenty of mythological features; Jesus physically ascending to Heaven, repeat appearances of angels ( and the Lord himself ), several enemies struck by sudden death; Peter and Paul preforming miracle after miracle, including both raising The dead Peter in ( Acts 9:36--41 ) and Paul in ( Acts 20: 9 ), There are many points in Acts where an incident about Paul is completely contradicted by what Paul himself actually tells us, in every case where there is an overlap between Acts and the genuine letters of Paul, '' Luke '' the writer of Acts has twisted the facts, or flatly made new ones up, for example, Following his conversion, Paul tells us he did not confer ( take council ) with anyone, he immediately left for Arabia and returned to Damascus afterwards, he said, it was another three years before he went to Jerusalem read ( Galatians 1: 15--18 ) Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Cephas ( Peter ) and stayed with him for fifteen days, verse 19, I saw none of the other apostles, Only James, The Lord's brother. Before that Paul was unknown by face to the churches of Judea ( Galatians 1 : 22--23 ), But in Acts chapter 9 Paul is well known to the Jerusalem church and is interacting with them continuously from the beginning, even before his conversion, Instead of going to Arabia, in Acts he heads directly back to Jerusalem to report for duty to the church leaders there, The writer of Acts is trying to paint the quarrelling factions of the early believers, like Peter and Paul as one big happy family, it is clear, that the author of Acts wanted to stress the unity between Judaism and Christianity, and Paul's close relationship to the other apostles, even if he had to Lie to do it, Despite centuries of Christian insistence that Luke is among the finest historian of all time ( after all, he would have to be, since they think he got his information from Paul, Who wasn't an eyewitness either ), he continues to make mistake after mistake in his borrowings from Josephus and from Mark, Then there is the Three Rebel Leaders mentioned in Acts, Judas the Galilean ( Acts 5:37 ) Taken from Josephus Jewish Wars 2.117-8, and Antiquities of the Jew 18 : 1--8, Theudas Acts 5 : 36, Taken from Antiquities of the Jew, 20:97, And the Egyptian ( Acts 21:38 ) Taken from JW 2:261-3, and Antiquities of the Jew 20 : 171, What are the odds ? that Luke just happens to bring up these three men at all ( no other Christian author does ), and he just happens to name three rebel leaders, and all three just happen to also be named by Josephus in his books, even though Josephus says there were many such rebels, we can see why Luke the writer of Acts would be tempted to make use of these three rebel leaders, Josephus was writing for a Roman audience, if the Romans knew any Jewish rebels, it would be these Three men, Josephus uses them as example of what good Jews are not, And Luke name them specifically as examples of what Christians are not, Josephus gives us Judas the Galilean, A Military rebel, Luke gives us Jesus the Galilean, a peaceful teacher and healer, It's interesting to see how Luke also downplays Jesus' use of violence in cleansing the temple, instead emphasizes his role as teacher ( compare Luke 19 : 45--48 with Mark 11:15--18, Matthew 21:13--16 & John 2 : 13--6 ), And Josephus specifically showcase Theudas and the Egyptian as impostors, ( False Messiah's ), Luke had good reason to want to disassociate his Messiah from these two, recently popularised to the Romans by Josephus as villains, Finally, even the mistakes that Luke makes contains Clues that he is stealing from Josephus, When Luke brings in the famous Pharisee leader Gamaliel and invents a speech for him in Acts 5:34--39, please read this passage, Two problems; First of all, Theudas' rebellion was not some time ago, For Gamaliel, That revolt hadn't happen yet, and was still fifteen years or so away, ( 44--46 C.E. ) What's more Judas the Galilean did not rise up '' After him '' That had happen back in 6 or 7 C.E. How did Luke manage to bungle so badly, pre-dating one revolt 40 years and reversing the correct order of both ? he did it, by blindly following Josephus, copying Josephus, When Josephus mentions Theudas in Antiquities 20..97--102, he follows up by Talking about the fate of Judas the Galilean's sons, and then recaps the actions of Judas himself ( associating him with the census, or taxation), just as in Acts 5:37, So Luke the writer of Acts repeating this very same incorrect sequence, which makes sense in Josephus but not in Acts, it is a clear sign of copying, There is also telling mistakes with the Egyptian, Luke has him leading an army of 4,000 Sicarii into the wilderness or desert, The knife-wielding Sicarii 's were Jewish assassins who attack their Roman enemies, Ninja-style, and then slipped away under the concealment of the city crowds, Not in the wilderness, but in the cities, But the bigger problem is that Josephus doesn't link The Egyptian with the Sicarii, Though he mentions both in exactly the place, ( JW 2.258--61, & JA 20.167--9 ), the same place where he also mentions other rebel figures who led people into the wilderness, unlike the Egyptian, who led his followers to the Mount of Olives,
@rtee4086
8 ай бұрын
Luke and Josephus Story Parallels, Continuation; As mentioned before, Luke is the only Gospel writer who even claims to be writing history, and more than any other Evangelist, Luke includes references to current events and Famous individuals of the early first century, conspicuously, Virtually every incident or famous person that Luke mentions turns up somewhere in Josephus' writings, And in very telling ways...These are mostly from two books of Josephus; his twenty-volume history of the Jewish people, Antiquities of the Jew, and his account of the Jewish War with Rome in the years 66 to 70 AD/CE, The Jewish War, many of these features in Luke-Acts provide solid evidence of borrowing or copying from Josephus, Luke mentioning the census under Quirinius ( Luke 2 : 1 ) is taken from The books, The Jewish wars 2.117-8, and Antiquities of the Jews 18.1--8, This raises suspicion for these reasons, First of all, no other ancient author except Josephus wrote about this census, Josephus himself only used it as an excuse to introduce his evil villains, So it's dubious that it should turn up as a key event anywhere else, This is especially strange since only Josephus connects the census with the Zealot rebel leader Judas the Galilean, And Therefore, it is peculiar That Luke should do so too ( Acts 5:37 ). This is clearly part of Josephus' literary artistry, How did Luke then, come to associate the Egyptian, incorrectly, with The Sicarii ? if he did so independently of Josephus, The coincidence is extraordinary, it is even more remarkable because Sicarii is a Latin term for assassins, Josephus seems to have been the first to borrow this word and make it A technical term for the Jewish rebels in his Greek written narrative, That Luke should use the same word, and similarly combine or conflate The Egyptian with the other impostors mentioned by Josephus in the very same passage As leading people into the wilderness, show further copying, This mistake by Luke is only found out by people who read the works of Josephus and the Gospel of Luke with the Acts of the Apostles, in Antiquities of the Jews 19.343-52, King Herod Agrippa 1st died while attending a festival in Caesarea, On the second day of the Bash or the festivities, he wore a fabulous robe of pure silver, which shines spectacularly in the morning sun, The bedazzled crowd hails him As a god, and he basks in their adoration without rebuking their flattery, Naturally, The Lord God won't accept this, and promptly smites him with agonising stomach pains so severe he dies five days later, Luke make some changes to this account by Josephus, giving Herod his just punishment during a public address to a delegation from Tyre and Sidon;; Luke said, '' On an appointed day Herod put on his royal robes, took his seat on the Throne, and delivered a public address to them, The people kept shouting, it's the voice of a god, and not of a mortal ! And immediately, because he had not given the glory to God, An angel of the Lord struck him down, and he was eaten by worms and died, '' read this in ( Acts 12:21--23 ), Although Luke's story differs in some details, the strange point of mentioning Herod putting on his royal robes, without making the connection obvious, is suggestive of plagiarising, Otherwise why bring up the robe at all, In Acts 24: 24--26 Antiquities of the Jews 20.143, Luke has more of his fun and game, When he introduced Marcus Antonius Felix, The governor of Judea ( 52-58 C.E. ) into the story, Felix and his Jewish wife Drusilla send for Paul, Who discusses '' Justice, self-control, and the coming judgment , '' For some unexplained reason, This talk terrifies Felix, and he quickly sends Paul away, at no time in their discussion did Paul ever mention the resurrection of Jesus or faith in Christ, which dominate the book elsewhere, There is no word from Luke why Felix's wife Drusilla even warrants a mention. As with Agrippa, The backstory is to be found in Josephus's writings, Who reported that Drusilla was the wife of the king of Emessa before Felix seduced her away and took her to be his own wife, To add to the scandalous fun, Drusilla was also The sister to Agrippa and Berenice, Josephus also tells us that Felix was cruel to the Jews and he was notoriously corrupt, A Fact Luke also picks up on by having Felix hoping that Paul will offer a bribe to be release from being locked up, ( Acts 24:26 ), even as fiction, The historical deeds and fate of Jesus would be crucial rhetorical material for both the prosecution and defence in all of Paul's many trial's, They should have been arguing over the facts of Jesus' ministry, teachings, miracles, The facts of his alleged death and the fate of his body, The charges against him and the significance of his conviction, and Whether he was still alive and at large, And what he was instructing his spiritual soldiers to do, That Luke wouldn't even Think of this when he was inventing these tales is hard to explain, especially since he provides us with speeches, Not just From Peter but also from Paul ( As in his Antioch Church speech read Acts 13:14--52 ), it's difficult to know how much to make of the fact that all of those very important details have mysteriously vanished from Luke's report, despite these trials of Paul is collectively the longest and most detailed series of trials hearings in Acts. As so often in Biblical studies, There are several possibilities, and little certainty available as to which, if any, is correct, Did Luke fabricate Paul's trial, the way he did virtually everything else, We may never know for certain, but it appears more likely, if this is correct, Then it's here in these isolated passages that we are catching glimpses of the real historical Paul, A man who did not preach the human Jesus of the later Gospels, but a cosmically dying and rising Christ known only through revelation and scripture. The biggest vanishing act in Acts is that of Jesus himself, but he is not the only one, In fact, If we are taking the book seriously as real history, it is extremely strange that so many of the characters simply just Disappear from the historical record entirely, And if Acts was real history, There is no plausible explanation for their mass departure, Here are the list of some of the most noteworthy disappearance in Acts; ( 1 ) Pontius Pilate, of all the names on this list, Only Pontius Pilate has physical evidence to support his existence, This is not entirely coincidental, since of all The names on this list, only Pilate was a real person, And once we get to Acts, even Pilate is no longer on the scene, he's only mentioned as a side note in speeches by Christians echoing Luke's Gospel ( Acts 3:13, 4:27, 13:28 ) ( 2 ) Joseph of Arimathea, like Pilate, once his part is done, Joseph of Arimathea, who we are told is a wealthy and influential Jewish leader, suddenly disappear from the story, so does his suspiciously named hometown ( to this day Arimathea cannot be found anywhere ), ( 3 ) Simon of Cyrene and his sons ( 4 ) Alexander and ( 5 ) Rufus, Mark goes out of his way to mention Simon & Sons by name ( Mark 15:21 ), and ( Luke 23;26 ), but none of them ever appear again, raising suspicions They are just symbolic insertion, ( 6 ) Mary, her sister ( 7 ) Martha and her brother ( 8 ) Lazarus, see ( Luke 10:38--42 & John 11:1, 12, 17, ) Lazarus is a crucial figure in John's Gospel, So it's quite odd that he doesn't appear in any other gospels or Acts. That is, unless John simply made him up, Then it makes perfect sense, ( 9 ) Nicodemus ( John 3:1--9, 7:50, 19 : 39 ), Likewise, The Pharisee Nicodemus play's a major role in the Jesus story, the passion story, But only in the fourth gospel, He appears nowhere else, suggesting he is solely a creation of John's, ( 10 ) Mary Magdalene, Though her role and her importance starts in Mark and grows in every other gospels, She apparently has no part to play after the curtain has come down on the Gospels, From Acts chapter 2 on, not a single one of these people ever does or say anything again, They just vanished, and their departure or lack of further involvement is never ever noticed by most, or explained, And there is another major group of the disappeared in Acts, ( 11 ) The entire Family of Jesus, Luke tells us Jesus' mother Mary and his brothers were among the first to join the Jerusalem church see ( Acts 1:14 ), But after Christianity goes public on the Day of Pentecost in Acts chapter 2, They all immediately and completely vanish into thin air, Mary is never mentioned again, She never does or say anything, is never spoken to or heard of again, We aren't even told where or when she lived or died, She literally disappears from history, As if she never existed. They are never mentioned again, Generations later, Two of them will have epistles written in their names, But according to Acts, They had no role at all to play in the history of the Church, and are never heard from again, No one even seems to be aware they exist, Then Jesus's alleged earthly Father Joseph, He having already disappeared from the story years ago, While Jesus was still a Child of twelve, ( his last appearance is in Luke 2:48 ), Maybe he had died, Though this is pure speculation, since no one ever mentions his death anywhere, A Fact which itself is very strange, Since the Gospels don't care about Jesus' sisters ( Mark 6:3, & Matthew 13:56 ) perhaps we could put their neglect down to Biblical misogynism, But the complete disappearance of Jesus's mother and brothers ? That baffling for Christians To explain.
@rtee4086
8 ай бұрын
Continuation; In short, the narrative we have in Acts is so unrealistic, it cannot have been based on anything that actually happened. it's what Luke wishes to have happened,, maybe what he wants people to believe happened, but it is certainly not what happened, For instance, right from the beginning, Luke's history of the Early Christian movement shows some bizarre lapses, The first is Jesus himself, From the moment Christianity first goes public in downtown Jerusalem and throughout all the other chapters spanning three decades of Christian history, At no point in the story do either the Jewish or Roman authorities ever appear to know that Jesus's body is missing, let alone that he was alive and walking around for 40 days, No one from either authorities heads to the empty tomb to launch an investigation of tomb robbery or body snatching, both severe death penalty offences back then, because if The Christians were really pointing to the empty tomb as proof of Jesus' resurrection back then, They would have been the prime suspects, Joseph of Arimathea, was the last person known to have had custody of the body, He would have been the first one hauled in for questioning, Instead, once his part is done, this supposedly wealthy and influential Jewish leader vanishes completely from the story, As if no one knew anything about him.. Or As if he never existed at all, But if he couldn't be found, and he didn't confess to getting rid of the body, Then The Christians would be next in the dock, because there is no chance that Pilate or the Jewish Sanhedrin would buy any claims of a resurrection or ascension ( And there is no evidence they did ). Still, let's assume there really was an Empty tomb and Jesus followers were reporting that he had somehow escaped his execution, that he had reappeared to his followers, and then disappeared, in other words, Jesus an escaped traitor and dangerous rabble rouser who claimed to be the true king of the Jews was still at large. In that case, Pilate would have been compelled to haul in every Christian and Their accomplice and interrogate every possible witness in a massive manhunt, And like the Romans, if the Sanhedrin thought they had failed to kill Jesus, They simply would have redoubled their efforts to make sure they did the Job right the second time. Yet none of this happens, No one ask where Jesus is hiding or who aided him, No one is at all concerned that there may be an escaped convict, False Messiah and pretender to the Throne, Obstructionist of Roman law and Judgement, Dire threat to the Jewish authority, Still alive and well somewhere, and still giving orders to his followers, Why would No one care that the Christians were claiming They took him in, Hid him from the authorities, and fed him after his escape from justice, Unless back then they weren't claiming any such thing ? This is enough to confirm Acts' account of events is a fabrication, Assuming any of this story was true, The Christians should have been the main suspects for the crime of grave robbery, However, although Acts records case after case of them being interrogated in trials before both Jews and Romans on other offences ( e.g. Acts 4, 5, 6--7, 18:12--17, 23, 25, 26, etc. )never once in this entire Church history are Christians ever suspected of, Or questioned about, grave robbery, it's as if there was no missing body to investigate, No empty tomb known to the authorities, So The Christians can't really have been pointing to to an empty tomb as proof of their story, if they had, They would have been questioned about it, innocent or not, Yet Acts shows there were no disputes at all regarding what happened to the body of Jesus, Not even false accusations of theft, Or even questions or expression of amazement, Even when Peter, in his first street sermon, brings up that King David died and was buried , and his tomb is with us to this day ( Acts 2:29 ) he fails to make the glaringly obvious appeal to Jesus' tomb actually being empty, and no one there affirms or challenges the fact, it simply doesn't even comes up, A Few chapters later ( Acts 4:16 ), When Peter is on trial for healing a cripple, The whole town is amazed and the Sanhedrin is bewildered and perplexed because they can't cover up a miracle of this magnitude, But why isn't all of Jerusalem buzzing about Jesus having just returned from the dead and ascending into heaven ? Likewise, Twice when Paul is on trial ( Acts 22:30, 23:10, and 18:12--17 ) The Roman official in charge knows nothing about any charges of grave robbery or body snatching, or even of Jesus's role in Paul's case, Instead, in both incidents they note Paul is only accused concerning matters of the Jewish religion, he's not charged with anything deserving death or imprisonment under Roman law, ( Acts 18:14--16, & 23:26--35 ),
@mr.renaissancemts4083
8 ай бұрын
Bible says Antioch were the first christians
@H-youtube7
8 ай бұрын
Please can you give references to some of the knowledge quoted.
@H-youtube7
8 ай бұрын
Where does the reference to Ethiopia being Africa, Americas and Asia appear, '3 Ethiopias'? There is more genetic similarity between Africa and Europe than within Africa
@ISOHOE
8 ай бұрын
...Greets ❤🙏...With the greatest of Raspekts you have not shown ANY SOURCES to validate much of what you have said. 4,th AD Christianity is officially adopted.Prior to this The Peoples were PAGAN .. Frumentius is of Lebanese or Syrian ethnicity and the Saints were of Turkish / Roman and other Nationalities. The Ethiopian Bible is translated from the Greek Septuagint. You can't show any Ethiopian sources of that time or Sources outside of Ethiopia to prove I Incorrect .
@ISOHOE
8 ай бұрын
..The I dem is Free to Venerate n Praise what you like .However when it comes to dealing with the Historical aspects " Truth " and not " Urban Myth " is paramount. The Ethiopia mentioned in Scripture is not the Ethiopia of Today. It Is Kush modern day Sudan... Ethiopia in Antiquity was a generic term of " burnt faced people's"Herodotus that occupied the Land ..Are you familiar with the Religious practices history of the People who populated the Land when K Ezana converted ..
@VINEMCKOY
8 ай бұрын
❤💛💚❤️💛💚❤️💛💚
@MJessicaB
7 ай бұрын
was rastafari created by a freemason please respond
@sarahbreedlove8483
8 ай бұрын
Bible King James Version (1611)
@Winter74575
6 ай бұрын
But Frumentius was not Black( African) either and although you see pictures of Jesus looking black in Ethiopian drawings they don’t really believe he was black, they know he was Jewish and would’ve looked how the Jewish people actually look. The point is Frumentius is not much different from the white peoples you talk about as far as the information we have about him.
@peterjones6014
8 ай бұрын
...also you say Mary Magdalene followrs were a cult, but she was Yeshua closest disciple, and prophecy about hwre going back to book genesis 40, silver chalice found in sack of tribe of Benjamin, San Graal , or Sang Royal, her following flourished in Provence in south France and had popes outside or Rome and called themselves Church of Love, and rejected Roman church, they were brutally murdered , for it , I reckon they has alot the true teachings right there and Mary name means salty sea, God is the sea of love ...I reckon there is something in that , cult isnt necessarily bad, it where word culture come from right ...
@telasmshinges6850
8 ай бұрын
♾️👁️🗨️〰️🔔🕙❤
@abdonmanuelmartinezmartine7217
8 ай бұрын
No one can see the Arch I ment...
@rasadobe7448
6 ай бұрын
Armenian Bible is also a old Bible Rastafari
@ethantrajkovski
2 ай бұрын
Not quite because codex Sinaiticus, codex Vaticanus, codex Alexandrinus are older bibles than the Ethiopian Bible. Sorry but please stop spreading misinformation.
@user-ys8gk2mr5u
23 күн бұрын
All i can say sellassie i is not God
@summernegroid62
5 ай бұрын
Is there any surviving copy of the ancient Ethiopian Bible today? I need one
Пікірлер: 63