I have always tried to reconcile Egyptian history with the Bible and this made it so clear! I had to listen to it again second time.
@protorhinocerator142
6 ай бұрын
Egypt has edited its own history. In Genesis we see one man, Joseph the son of Israel, save Egypt from extinction by famine. He was one of the wisest people in the Bible. If not for Joseph, Egypt would have died. He should have been hailed as a hero or one of the Founding Fathers or something. Right at the beginning of Exodus, some 400 years later, nobody remembered Joseph, not even the Pharaoh. Millions of Israelites in the land, but the reason they were there in the first place had been erased over time. Egyptians were careless with their own history. Exodus 1:8 Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph.
@desativadoofficial
6 ай бұрын
@@protorhinocerator142 I believe they knew Joseph (because the king mentions he fears the Israelites joining their enemies and going back to Canaan, which he uses as a reason to enslave them).
@johntomlinson-j6x
6 ай бұрын
Simcha Jacobovici and James Cameron Made an Extensive Documentary series About 2 years ago on KZitem, Called, The Naked Archeologist. Starting with the Exodus and leading through many Biblical stories. Stripping away these preconceptions. Starting with the Jewish Bible as Simcha's source. It fascinated me for weeks. Much of it suitable for children but some a little scary. revealing New archelogy, and stripping away some of the old Biblical biases
@protorhinocerator142
6 ай бұрын
@@johntomlinson-j6x Also check out Patterns of Evidence: Exodus. Archaeological proof of Joseph, the great famine, Moses, etc.
@steveOCalley
6 ай бұрын
@@desativadoofficialWhat was the cause for the enslaving of the Hebrews?
@kevinkleinsasser9387
6 ай бұрын
Ancient Egyptians were notorious for not recording their failures or loses.
@steveOCalley
5 ай бұрын
And how do you know?
@bibbulmun777
5 ай бұрын
@@steveOCalley there is reputable documentation to support this. Take Rameses II in his temple at Abu simbel, for example. On the walls he records a sweeping victory against the Hittites. But elsewhere there is ample documentation to show that he actually signed a peace treaty with them. This is also a good reason why they would not record the annals of a slave nation on tombs etc. Try watching the full video.
@steveOCalley
5 ай бұрын
But your statement doesn’t hold water. There’s nothing particularly Egyptian about slanting their stories to favor the ruler in power. No matter what, Egyptology is an expert’s job. Making a video doesn’t imply that level of expertise. And if you favor the idea that the absence of stories is itself a story is itself a story, think again.
@bibbulmun777
5 ай бұрын
@@steveOCalley Talk about playing the man and not the ball. How dare you discredit when you have not even bothered to check out how much he has written or produced on the subject. Your own assertion is demonstrably fact free in itself. As an example, Rameses II temple at Abu Simbel is replete with him vanquishing the Hittites. Yet elsewhere there are records of them signing a peace treaty with the Hittites. And the fact they don't mention their enemies adds weight to the fact they would not mention the Hebrews. They leave the names of the enemy kings unnamed on monuments as to not speak 'life' into their names. See creation.com/egypt-chronology, an article that is also replete with references to support what I've just suggested. While this is one video, how much have you written, filmed or produced about Egypt. Bates mentioned that he's been there many times and liaises with academics in Egypt!
@bibbulmun777
5 ай бұрын
@@steveOCalley @stevevaughn8428 Talk about playing the man and not the ball. How dare you discredit when you have not even bothered to check out how much he has written or produced on the subject. Your own assertion is demonstrably fact free in itself. As an example, Rameses II temple at Abu Simbel is replete with him vanquishing the Hittites. Yet elsewhere there are records of them signing a peace treaty with the Hittites. And the fact they don't mention their enemies adds weight to the fact they would not mention the Hebrews. They leave the names of the enemy kings unnamed on monuments as to not speak 'life' into their names. See creation dot come and type in egypt-chronology. The first article is also replete with references to support what I've just suggested. While this is one video, how much have you written, filmed or produced about Egypt. Bates mentioned that he's been there many times and liaises with academics in Egypt!
@JohnMackeyIII
3 ай бұрын
The gospel is foolishness to those that are perishing 😮
@amyhenningsgard8618
Ай бұрын
❤The Gospel ❤️The Truth ❤️ The Lord Jesus Christ
@tastysidewalk4676
11 күн бұрын
My people will perish for lack of knowledge
@jdmills123456789
6 ай бұрын
This is the second great argument for Amenhotep II as the pharaoh of the exodus. I think it makes way more sense than Ramses the Great.
@yourssincerely442
6 ай бұрын
The documentary of Tim Mahoney "patterns of evidence the exodus" from 2014 lays it out quite clear that Ramses wasn't the Pharao of Egypt in the time of the exodus. He's really a Hollywood pharao. Although he did exist later on in history
@izziebon
5 ай бұрын
It does. But I think Amenhotep III is far more likely, with his second-born son Akhenaten.
@jdmills123456789
5 ай бұрын
@@izziebon interesting. Do you have any sources for that as a theory that I could check out?
@izziebon
5 ай бұрын
@@jdmills123456789 See the 200-page book ‘Amarna and the Biblical Exodus’ by Dirk Schroeder. Based mostly on the 382 ‘Amarna Letters’ (English translations of the relevant bits are in one of the chapters ) and lots of other physical and circumstantial evidence.
@Taharqo.saved.the.Hebrew
4 ай бұрын
Are you saying moses parted the red sea killing a Egyptian Pharaoh and the Pharaoh's Army , but the Ancient Egyptians didn't document this event that would have been life changing and prove to the Egyptians the power of God , 😂😂😂😂 Christianity is funny
@Reg_The_Galah
6 ай бұрын
Awesome! Incredible how archaeological discoveries further confirm biblical events.
@michaelabbott9080
6 ай бұрын
We know that the Bible contains references to actual historic places,people and events..There is no issue with that,but that fact in itself does not confirm the magic bits,it does not confirm any of the so called miracles Inc the resurrection. If in 5000yrs time an archaeologist discovers a Spiderman comic..and further research shows him the NYC actually existed,that it had lots of very tall buildings and that The inhabitents spoke English...Those facts cannot be used as evidence that Spiderman was real.
@Reg_The_Galah
6 ай бұрын
@@michaelabbott9080 so just like the story of evolution and cosmology.
@PJRayment
6 ай бұрын
@@Reg_The_Galah "so just like the story of evolution and cosmology." Huh?
@Reg_The_Galah
6 ай бұрын
@@PJRayment never you mind
@PJRayment
6 ай бұрын
@@Reg_The_Galah "never you mind" I'm not allowed to ask what the basis is for your comparison? That seems rather arrogant.
@englishgentleman3551
4 ай бұрын
I’m not religious but I love these stories of Jesus and the ancient world.
@terrancelancaster5789
17 күн бұрын
I'm pretty sure you do, but these stories are inaccurate. They're just stories. It might be the greatest story ever told. But it's not the greatest truth ever told. It seems is that the Roman Catholic church failed people. If you need to hurt the truth, ask us the Hebrews. Not jews And not israelite We are 3 separate people. We don't believe in the same things.
@refuse2bdcvd324
6 ай бұрын
The Bible has been used by many archeologists as primary source material in understanding artifacts being unearthed in the Middle East today. So people who reject scripture are denying documented history.
@jordazmo19
6 ай бұрын
Unfortunately those people don't care about what's true, they're utterly in denial, completely brainwashed and only interested in what makes them feel justified in their denial of and rebellion towards God. It's sad to see people who think of themselves as SO smart be SOOO incredibly foolish and downright silly. It's one of the things the demonstrates that it's NOT an intellectual issue, it's a heart issue.
@refuse2bdcvd324
6 ай бұрын
@@jordazmo19 100% correct!
@nhoj924lll
6 ай бұрын
@@jordazmo19 Remember there are 3 kinds of Believers Un believers make believers and believers, The unbelievers are obvious.The make believers are not, the believers almost Always humbly mostly quietly go about their existence
@refuse2bdcvd324
6 ай бұрын
@@all_bets_on_Ganesh we don't have to rewrite history, biology, astronomy, or any other discipline in science in order to accept scripture. The parts of these disciplines that disagree with scripture are purely theoretical.
@cieslaolsztyn8266
6 ай бұрын
@@all_bets_on_Ganesh said you see the video? You mean he is all wrong?
@expressoevangelism80
6 ай бұрын
Where do you think the Israelites picked up their celebration of Passover? The menu of the Passover meal is so specific that it cannot be denied that is it all very relevant for what would happen next. I think it is such a beautiful ‘coincidence’ as to how that same Passover was used as the gateway into God’s new covenant with mankind. When Jesus cried out:- ‘It is finished.’ That was the sign of the final stage for us all.
@JesusistheonetrueGod
3 ай бұрын
Genesis 3:15 ESV [15] I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel."
@williamtotherow3367
16 сағат бұрын
I thought he cried out "Lord why have you forsaken me" or Forgive them for they do not know what they do" which is it?
@expressoevangelism80
9 сағат бұрын
@@williamtotherow3367 I’m sure you’ve checked. He said a few things whilst he was suspended on the cross, as you probably know. It’s easy enough to check. His last words form the cross were:- ‘It is finished.’
@expressoevangelism80
9 сағат бұрын
@@JesusistheonetrueGod I seem to have missed your point. Did you mean to attach it to my observation?
@williamtotherow3367
7 сағат бұрын
@@expressoevangelism80 Not true, each gospel has it different "Jesus last words are different depending on which Gospel you read.
@SK-bw2cv
6 ай бұрын
Bible archaeology is so fun. I love this stuff!
@wefinishthisnow3883
4 ай бұрын
I'm glad you enjoy it. Would you care to share what archaeological evidence supporting the Bible you have found so far?
@JesusistheonetrueGod
3 ай бұрын
@@wefinishthisnow3883 watch expedition bible, and also watch this video
@stellarspacetraveler
16 күн бұрын
@@wefinishthisnow3883 Google the hundreds of archaeological finds in Israel that verify what is written in the Bible.
@williamtotherow3367
16 сағат бұрын
There is none.
@anarchorepublican5954
6 ай бұрын
📚🧐...when I was in High School in the 1980s, the mysterious foreign "Shepherd Kings" or "Hyksos", were thought to be Indo-Europeans- related to Anatolian Hittites...now we know they were actually Levantine (Canaan) Semites...they even had a King named "Yakob" or "Jacob".....
@sophiawilson8696
4 ай бұрын
They were ran out of Egypt!
@anarchorepublican5954
4 ай бұрын
@@sophiawilson8696 ...Yes... they were called "the Shepherd Kings" or Hyksos...they were expelled (and enslaved) by Egyptians around 1400 BC ... shortly thereafter "Habiru"(Hebrew) raiders and "Nomads(Shasu) of YHWH" begin to show up in Canaanite Royal Records...
@Beyonder1987
4 ай бұрын
Hyksos were not Indo European and no relations to Hitties. Hyksos were Semetic people who originated in the Syria and later migrated and conquered parts of Egypt
@iamdarinlee
2 ай бұрын
Hitties and Canaanites are both of Ham… Hamitic people. How do people keep changing their origin to Shem/semites? This is lazy logic and lack of knowledge.
@jonatasmachado7217
6 ай бұрын
Excellent case for biblical accuracy
@rokytomy8165
6 ай бұрын
I am an Egyptian Copt, and I can say that the children of Israel were part of the Hyksos group, who declared themselves rulers of Egypt and considered themselves pharaohs. This period lasted for about 400 years, from the Thirteenth Dynasty to the end of the Seventeenth Dynasty, and they controlled the northern part of Egypt, while southern Egypt remained under the rule of the Pharaoh kings. The originals, and from there, the process of liberating Egypt from the Hyksos began. Pharaoh Kamuza died fighting them, so Ahmose’s daughter undertook the process of expelling them from Egypt, and he succeeded in doing so until what is called the Land of Israel now, and the era of the Eighteenth Dynasty began in the year 1500 BC.
@bibbulmun777
5 ай бұрын
Not so. This comes from Josephus who is demonstrably wrong on that fact. If you are a Christian then you should be taking a Bible first approach. Nowhere does it say that the Hebrews were Kkngs in the land. Only Joseph who was elevated to Vizier. Watch the whole video as it explains the Hebrew presence.
@steveOCalley
5 ай бұрын
I have great respect for the first Christians, of which the Coptic Christians are a less-known branch in the West. I believe it’s *rude and arrogant* to the point of *apostasy* to tell Coptic Christians how to worship.
@bibbulmun777
5 ай бұрын
@@steveOCalley goodness gracious, you are so argumentative. No one is telling him how to worship. I mentioned that he is referring to extrabiblical resources to derive an unsubstantiated opinion. And you certainly don't know what apostasy means. BTW how many Coptic Christians do you know. I've been to Egypt five times for research and consider many my friends. And some of them are Egyptologists. They certainly would not agree with the original comment about the Hyksos and the Hebrews being one and the same. As I said, this came from Josephus and extrabiblical source. Do your research instead of just trying to score cheap points.
@phylli777
5 ай бұрын
This makes some sense in that Joseph was the second senior most after Pharaoh. During his time of leadership, the Israelites must also have been privileged and also many in positions of leadership. Their enslavement came AFTER the death of that pharaoh.
@steveOCalley
5 ай бұрын
@@bibbulmun777 Well bless your heart! 💜 Aren’t you special! Well, the Coptic Christians knew what apostasy meant, as they were in the realm of Julian. As for history of Egypt, I’m sure you have watched many documentaries on the subject, filtered of course for your entitled certainty of righteousness. All your Coptic Christian friends-have they actually uttered the words you have assigned to them, or did you scan their minds? Have you tried to bring them to Jesus? I am not so arrogant as to claim all knowledge of a Christian community that existed a millennium before your ancestors gave up idol worship. You do. I merely suggest that you try some humility in correcting the wayward Copts. I don’t mind how much you exalt yourself as an authority. Be my guest. And Josephus, a political agent seeking to Hellenize the Jews, a goal of the Pharisees and Paul, is a dangerous “extrabiblical source” whose clear actions all his life was focused upon the Jews and their incorporation peacefully into Rome. Perhaps the Copts lived and grew their Christianity through all these times, and may have felt less warmly towards this “Jewish apostate” whatever that word means. Clearly the move of Christianity other than towards Asia Minor was just an unintentional scattering of lesser “Christians” uninterested in the Pauline/Pharasaical traditions. I would not know as much as you do on the matter. Ritter 1866: _Josephus is, however, to be used with great care. As a Jewish scholar, as an officer of Galilee, as a military man, and a person of great experience in everything belonging to his own nation, he attained to that remarkable familiarity with his country in every part, which his antiquarian researches so abundantly evince. But he was controlled by political motives: his great purpose was to bring his people, the despised Jewish race, into honour with the Greeks and Romans; and this purpose underlay every sentence, and filled his history with distortions and exaggerations._ Did Christianity attain its greatest moment in taking over the Roman Empire? Or just when that little boy was born in Bethlehem?
@chrischarles9213
6 ай бұрын
Good teaching sir 👍🏾,...watching from across the pond ✊🏾 🇯🇲
@rehobothbaptist9776
5 ай бұрын
Same 👍🏴
@96tolife
6 ай бұрын
This was the most encouraging and confusing video I've seen in a long time. Thanks.
@MalcolmFanis
5 ай бұрын
I totally agree with u. So many questions were going through my head.
@OTSunny.
4 ай бұрын
🙄
@alexseeto2251
5 ай бұрын
Interesting to note that the most prosperous dynasty of Egypt was 18th so God really did bless Joseph and Israel
@marihanoclarke8657
5 ай бұрын
100%
@zion-jabezrobello7853
4 ай бұрын
The isrealites was dark skinned
@petermorton301
4 ай бұрын
Lies
@idread3523
4 ай бұрын
No
@inlonging
25 күн бұрын
@@zion-jabezrobello7853 who cares
@amandarae2403
4 ай бұрын
I'm just a regular person and I went down the rabbit holes and came up with all this same information, just like the man speaking. Once you know, you know.
@newcreationinchrist1423
6 ай бұрын
00:42 amen! It is a battle of worldviews. The secular worldview vs the Bible worldview.
@steveOCalley
6 ай бұрын
What do world views have to do with archaeology?
@PJRayment
6 ай бұрын
@@steveOCalley "What do world views have to do with archaeology?" Archaeology discovers artifacts. Worldviews provide the frameworks into which you try to fit those facts.
@calmdown2876
4 ай бұрын
Invite esteemed author Anthony T. Browder on your show to discuss Egypt. If you want a real scholar on the subject of Egypt invite Anthony T. Browder.
@idread3523
4 ай бұрын
Nah he's off too. Invite Ralph Ellis instead
@calmdown2876
4 ай бұрын
@@idread3523 Tony Browder has been study Egypt all of his life. Tony Browder has been excavating in Egypt for about 50 years. You can say whatever kind of foolishness you want to but Tony Browder is supremely qualified to teach, lecture and discuss the Nile Valley region of Africa.
@idread3523
4 ай бұрын
@@calmdown2876 - I'm specifically talking about the bible and Egypt and I don't believe Tony would be correct because his point of view would be off. I've read many of Tony's books. Been it comes to specifically Egypt and the A bible, I stick to Ralph Ellis. Check out his lectures on here. That's all I'm saying
@calmdown2876
4 ай бұрын
@@idread3523 The Bible has been tempered with by europeans who were atheist. The bible has been messed up every since europeans got their hands on it. You cannot go by the bible in it's current revised editions. King James was literally an atheist and mentally unstable. Tony Browder's work on Egypt and the Nile Valley is accurate. I have the blood of The Pharaohs running though my veins. I am not kidding.
@v1e1r1g1e1
6 ай бұрын
The Ipuwer Papyrus is an ancient Egyptian manuscript written in hieratic script, 378 cm x 18 cm, residing in the Dutch National Museum of Antiquities in Leiden, Netherlands. Its official designation is Papyrus Leiden I 344 recto. It is dated towards the end of the Middle Kingdom. It mentions a series of disasters that correspond very closely with the Ten Plagues mentioned in Exodus. Read it. Then come back and comment.
@KenJackson_US
6 ай бұрын
Do Egyptologists date the events consistent with the 1446BC exodus?
@desativadoofficial
6 ай бұрын
@@KenJackson_US Egyptologists doesn't seem to agree with anything
@michaelabbott9080
6 ай бұрын
@@desativadoofficial So people who have spent their academic careers studying ancient Egypt at the worlds top universities and institutions do not,as yet, have all the answers...but your unverifiable 2000yr old magic book does ...
@desativadoofficial
6 ай бұрын
@@michaelabbott9080 What does my reply have to do with yours? You want attention, take it.
@PJRayment
6 ай бұрын
@@desativadoofficial "So people who have spent their academic careers studying ancient Egypt at the worlds top universities and institutions do not,as yet, have all the answers.." Correct. There is considerable disagreement about the chronology. "but your unverifiable 2000yr old magic book does" Nonsense. First, it has been heavily verified. Second, it's not magic. You're just being nasty there. Third, it was written at the time, so would be more familiar with the events than Egyptologists today trying to put the bits together.
@Avery-Mac
4 ай бұрын
The Egyptians not mentioning millions of Hebrew slaves is like American plantation owners not mentioning all the slaves they owned.
@keithgale1641
6 ай бұрын
Fantastic thanks ❤
@pharoah-ahmose6075
4 ай бұрын
They were not white. Ancient Egyptians were black Africans
@matthewmckay7068
4 ай бұрын
😂 exactly!!! Some how he began to ramble about black history and culture without stating the obvious ....that they were Black .. 😂😂 I know that was tough to do for the whole interview lol
@iamdarinlee
2 ай бұрын
The whole time I’m just like “look at this white man talk about our history” 😂
@skunkape5918
Ай бұрын
Ramesses had red hair
@pharoah-ahmose6075
Ай бұрын
@@skunkape5918 -just google’Africans with red hair’ but that’s not the point.The point is that dyeing hair red is an African culture found throughout Africa.it’s common among Ethiopians,Eritreans,Somalis,the Masai of Kenya etc.
@fioschannel
6 ай бұрын
Very interesting and instructive talk. Thank you Gary.
@honahwikeepa2115
5 ай бұрын
The Bible is pure Antithesis. Take it away and right and wrong carry the same value at some stage. Like our current Postmodern Post-Christian day.
@AntonsClass
5 ай бұрын
This was very interesting. It does make a lot of sense that the Pharaoh was not a native Egyptian, but one of the Hyksos rulers of Lower Egypt. I never understood why the Pharaoh would be so willing to give land to these foreigners from the Nearest. This actually makes sense.
@robertschultz9623
5 ай бұрын
Abraham also traveled into Egypt for a time, it's possible he is the "Hyksos"
@Ogofor3913
4 ай бұрын
At least there should be one or two CLEAR EVIDENCE that a certain people called the Israel exited in Egypt after staying there for over 400 years and leaving so dramatically. In fact, Merneptah stele showed that they were just an ethnoreligious group somewhere in Canaan among more established, advanced societies. And this stele was made long after the Exudos supposedly occurred. The truth is clear on this one.
@davidwestfall4336
6 ай бұрын
Great! More historical & archeological evidence showing the validity of the Bible! I love the Truth.
@davidwestfall4336
5 ай бұрын
@vhawk1951kl Yes, Jesus, the Messiah, the single seed promised to Eve. In Genesis, YHWH shows through Abraham many from throughout the world would be saved. As you read on through Genesis, Exodus, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, the Samuels, Kings, Chronicles, Psalms (esp. 22), Isaiah (esp. 7, 14, 52-53), Micah 5. That's an extremely brief mention of material to review for the Messiah. When Jesus - actually Joshua, but Greek translated to French-Influenced English brought Jesus - walked and talked among us, there was NO New Testament. The gospels (good news) and letters explain and display how the promise of the "Old Testament" was fulfilled.
@spencerchabvonga3841
5 ай бұрын
The Egyptians were notorious for recording their own victories only and not of their enemies.
@frankedgar6694
4 ай бұрын
And the Egyptians would claim victory where there was no clear victory. The battle against the Hittites resulted in both sides claiming victory.
@yahadyashabbat9364
4 ай бұрын
Meneptah Stele.. ancient Egyptian records speaks of King David of Israel
@charlesdikenson744
4 ай бұрын
There was no ancient Egypt
@frankedgar6694
4 ай бұрын
@@charlesdikenson744 Sure, kid. That explains why you can read about them from a variety of sources. Their enemies wrote about them often. But sure. You nailed it. Sure you did.
@johng1732
4 ай бұрын
@@yahadyashabbat9364 you are completely wrong about that Stele. Not sure where you get your information from. That Stele was written centruies before David was even born. So how would it have anything written about David? It does recount a victory over a group of people called Israel. But It mentions nothing about King David as I previously stated that Stele was made CENTURIES before David's birth
@TickedOffPriest
6 ай бұрын
I never even thought to look there.
@MarcelinhoTheRock
5 ай бұрын
Thanks for this, incredible interview and really enlightening.
@efaleafine
6 ай бұрын
This is a very interesting perspective. But there are other possibilities as to why Moses (he wrote Genesis) referred (only one mention Genesis 37) to him as the Potiphar the Egyptian, maybe there was another well known Potiphar who was not an Egyptian so Moses wanted to make sure they knew which one he was talking about.
@donomar8517
4 ай бұрын
Israelite and israeli are two very different things
@jjw56
6 ай бұрын
Every civilization in the world knew the king of Egypt by name in their language. Bible can’t name a king when something pivotal happens in their history? It just seems strange that’s all
@PJRayment
6 ай бұрын
"Bible can’t name a king when something pivotal happens in their history?" Can't? Or chose not to?
@jjw56
6 ай бұрын
@@PJRayment I say the writers of the Bible could not. I believe there’s one instance it does and it names a king from 25th dynasty. The story is probably factual or based on fact, but most of the good book is a collection of stories handed down and borrowed from older cultures. And because of that point I believe the Bible is one of the greatest pieces of literature written. Nothing magical or supernatural.
@PJRayment
6 ай бұрын
@@jjw56 "I say the writers of the Bible could not." Clearly that is the explanation that you prefer, but that means nothing. "most of the good book is a collection of stories handed down and borrowed from older cultures." Evidence please, and not just evidence for similarity, but that the other cultures _are_ older and therefore couldn't have got it from the Bible, or the same source. "And because of that point I believe the Bible is one of the greatest pieces of literature written." Copies are usually inferior to the original, but you're saying that the copy is better? For example, the Bible gives different dimensions for the length, width, and height of Noah's ark, and those dimensions have been shown to provide for a very stable vessel. Whereas the Gilgamish Epic's ark had the same values for all three dimensions, making it a very unstable cube! "Nothing ... supernatural." Evidence please.
@jjw56
6 ай бұрын
@@PJRayment wow … and Jonah ate the whale.
@cosmictreason2242
5 ай бұрын
@@jjw56were the Romans after him unable to identify commodus? Or chose not to?
@Sekou156
4 ай бұрын
These people are fighting hard to make the Bible true but sadly it's a fairytale book. Egyptians do write about enemies victory. That's why we know about Hyksos occupation . So no Hebrew no Exodus
@vuyonkosi209
4 ай бұрын
Do we agree that Jesus was brown skinned ⁉️
@renemelendez3272
4 ай бұрын
Of course he was. So were 90% (or more) of the rest of the people from that area. Whoever argues this fact is blind or doesn’t know how to read!!!
@eileenjared
4 ай бұрын
Like any other Middle Easterner and the color most of the world while population today. Because we all come from 2 humans Adam and Eve.
@agenosam362
4 ай бұрын
Mary would have to have been brown. What was king David's color? Maybe somewhere along the way there was an intermarriage that resulted into Mary's family being brown. Or just one of her parents. Then Jesus would be brown. Jess are not brown generally. Soooo 95% no
@agenosam362
4 ай бұрын
Even then. The information is unimportant
@nathankimmett8803
4 ай бұрын
Most likely yup. One thing we are 99.9% he was not white lol
@stefanlouw6395
6 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation and interview!
@kimchiwasabee
4 ай бұрын
One would assume,they would've noticed n mentioned the pyramids in the torah/OT,eh?? Hard to overlook them. 🤷♂️
@davidjenkins2429
6 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@matthewmckay7068
4 ай бұрын
White Isreaites in Egypt 😅 Ancient Egypt, Ancient Nubia were Black People ☻️🖤 The first deity was Ptah
@juliekeeney1538
6 ай бұрын
Everything fits with the Bible if you view it in the right way.
@yahkimyisrayl6886
4 ай бұрын
Actually according to Bible there was a King of Salem who was a priest of the Most High Elohim. So the Egyptians would have also known who The Most High Elohim. Remember Abraham went into Egypt too.
@Baseball4lifer
6 ай бұрын
This is wonderful and answers so many questions as to why Joseph and his family were given the best of the land. That always struck an odd chord for me and I couldn’t figure out why!! Thank you for the clarification!
@daviddrew3372
6 ай бұрын
Forget Ramses . ( Not him). But look into Hapshetset and Shenmut. The Ipwyr lament papyrus and the people who lived in a the city of Avaris ( latter called Ramses) known as the Hyksos . The. Read up on the Lachish letters ( among the cuneiform tablets found in the library of anken Aten and their references to the Hapiru and Abir and their alliance with Hittites against Tyre , Lakish, Damascus etc. oh, and also the two reliefs in hieroglyphics which refer specifically to the wandering people who belong to Jehovah.
@AmpSkillz
4 ай бұрын
He says pyramids were ancient tombs… when we never found a tomb or grave inside of a pyramid ever. Tells us all we need to know about his credentials
@skueky
4 ай бұрын
Isn't there buriel chambers in the pyramids?
@AmpSkillz
4 ай бұрын
Nope
@skueky
4 ай бұрын
@@AmpSkillz The Great Pyramid of Giza was the of tomb Khufu, a pharaoh. Look it up if you don't believe me.
@AmpSkillz
4 ай бұрын
no mummy of a pharaoh has ever been discovered in any of the 138 pyramids we have located so far.. it was originally speculated they must be tombs for Pharaohs about 100 years ago and unfortunately no new prevailing accepted theory has replaced that. They claim all the bodies must have been stolen by looters yet we have found many completely sealed “tombs” completely undisturbed that had no bodies. It really makes no sense.
@AmpSkillz
3 ай бұрын
@@skueky no mummies or remains have been found in a pyramid and yet they have found many fully in tact “tombs” that have never been looted or unsealed that are completely empty boxes/caskets. There is no actual proof that it was Khufu’s tomb other than his name found written inside.
@ezesolomon3996
4 ай бұрын
Why didn't the writers of the Bible mention the Hyksos which were known in history? Who were the writers of these stories
@James-oj6ck
6 ай бұрын
Very good research and very convincing.
@daharris41
4 ай бұрын
First admit everyone was black and then you will be able to move forward with an honest conversation
@mohammedsuleman580
3 ай бұрын
@@daharris41 who cares if they were black, white, Indian, or whatever race?
@daharris41
3 ай бұрын
@@mohammedsuleman580 apparently I do
@mohammedsuleman580
3 ай бұрын
@@daharris41 get this poison out of your system, it will keep you out of the kingdom of God
@newcreationinchrist1423
6 ай бұрын
Thank you CMI! Watching now 😊🙏✝️
@SmilingChocolateStrawber-tl1nw
4 ай бұрын
A lot of claims, no evidence. His reason the valley of the kings is erroneous!
@tryme3969
6 ай бұрын
They're called the pyramids now but what were they called before that?
@nobarakugisaki356
5 ай бұрын
Good question And why is there no mention of pyramids or the sphinx in the Bible account of Moses
@cosmictreason2242
5 ай бұрын
@@nobarakugisaki356why would there be? They were ancient at the time
@lyndonkirkland9459
5 ай бұрын
Mir
@thomasaverti
5 ай бұрын
If the pharaoh in Genesis 41 was Hyksos, he might as well have believed in some Canaanite polytheistic pantheon such as the storm god Baal. The God in Genesis 41:38 in the original Hebrew was written as Elohim. Did the pharaoh a Hyksos really recognize the deity monotheistically?
@henryschmit3340
6 ай бұрын
Excellent.
@MrFreezook
5 ай бұрын
It would be incorrect to say the word "Pharaoh" at this supposed Hyksos time (which I am not against ie I don't deny that P. Joseph was at the time of the Hyksos) Simply because the term Pharaoh only began to be used as reference to the king himself and not the whole Palace, starting from Akhnaten (19th dynasty) While previously it the original word Pharaoh which is "Pr aA" was only used in courtiers' titles and nothing else, referring to the High Palace. because Pr aA originally meant the high palace or the great palace. So the Bible got the naming wrong. it should have been king. Also if the speaker in this video 9:22 supposed that the king was not a Polytheist or adopted the ancient Egyptian belief, then the least thing he should do is not to call himself Pharaoh. Coz the term itself is liked with creed and the creed of the other Pharaohs including The Pharaoh of Moses. & hence the term "Pharaonic" is now used. The Quoran Got it right. It's written "king" during the time of Joseph. Also another correction to a laughable mistake: The MerenPtah Stele does not say the Nation of Israel it mentions a list of nations indicated by their names followed by a determinative sign describing the names as Nations or countries, BUT when it came to the word Israel it does Not have this determinative , and it has another one which is used for "people" so it means Israelites Not the Nation or country of Israel in any way shape or form. + MerenPtah was mentioning those Nations & made an exception to the Israelites which is not writing the "foreign land sign" determinative, but instead wrote the "People sign" (which is a sitting man nest to a sitting woman in addition to the III 3 stick for plural) so it can be interpreted as Nomads or people without a specific land.
@inlonging
25 күн бұрын
The Quran got it right? The Jewish scriptures are at least in the BC years 😂😂😂 someone writing 2000 yrs later is not the authority on this
@kenwebster5053
6 ай бұрын
The "experts" are tied into Champollion’s chronology which is incorrect. Therefore, they find no evidence that fits that time line. However, David Rohl has developed an evidence-based timeline that resolves a lot of timeline issues and places the Israelites in and at the time of Avaris & it was abandoned just prior to the unopposed Hyksos invasion & subsequent Hyksos dynasty. That places the Exodus concurrent with the fall of the Canaanite cities, including Jericho. Is he correct? Well, I don’t know. I think he admits he probably hasn’t got everything correct, but he has proposed it for examination & discussion, with a view to further modification to see if it truly can stand up. However most just want to tear him down with personal attacks & assaults on his professional integrity. Well, that isn’t scholarship is it and it tells me they can find no real evidence-based objections to his chronology, if they could, they would state them, instead they engage in personal attacks. There are 2 other major chronologies to consider though & while I find the subject interesting, I am certainly not a scholar on the subject. Sometimes I wonder if these “professional” Archaeologists just want to please certain political & religious factions in the region to secure archaeological permits.
@ibrahimelmasry-z3k
6 ай бұрын
عزيزي السجلات المصريه لايوجد فيها اي شيء عن موسي او يوسف التاريخ المصري سجل كل شيء عن حياه الاجداد اكلهم وملابسهم واحزانهم وافراحهم وحروبهم والوقت الصعب والثورات لكن لايوجد اي كتابه عن موسي موسي لم يكن في مصر الكتاب المقدس ليس دقيق هو حكي اشياء ليست حقيقيه
@bryonstevenson1084
6 ай бұрын
@@ibrahimelmasry-z3k There's evidence they just want to deny it
@steveOCalley
6 ай бұрын
@@bryonstevenson1084Who are They?
@bryonstevenson1084
6 ай бұрын
@@steveOCalley Again Try a guy named Josephus, Pliny the younger etc start there .
@steveOCalley
6 ай бұрын
@@bryonstevenson1084so Flavius Josephus and Pliny the Younger wrote that there was no Moses or Jesus? Where? Huh?😊
@johndouven6642
4 ай бұрын
"Lords of Avaris" by Daivd Rohl, is a very good book to read. Mr. Rohl has produced a "shorten" Chronology...and it is interesting how much aligns with the Biblical Record. Also, he presents the idea that, many "kings" were kings of regions within Upper & Lower Egypt. The Bible states more than once that Hebron was built 7 years before Zoan in Egypt.
@IAMhassentyou
6 ай бұрын
Amen 🙏 God bless you
@hrhtreeoflife4815
5 ай бұрын
Q Heber = Hebrew Land of Goshen in Egypt Q❤
@Cutty007
6 ай бұрын
Wonderful!!
@josemiguelbaez8112
5 ай бұрын
Ahmose in the Ancient Kemetic language means, “Begotten of Yah” but wait how can the ancient Egyptian worship Yah, Iah, Aah who is Yah of the Hebrews of which Yahweh is composed of Yah and from which you get the name, Havayah, which means, Existence How can the Ancient Kemites and the Hebrews served the same Power that brought creation into existence from Nothing
@jackspoerner8852
6 ай бұрын
A fascinating watch is "Patterns of Evidence. Exodus"
@jbw3
5 ай бұрын
Explain why before I rent it? Is ameniII implicated as the pharaoh of the exodus?
@izziebon
5 ай бұрын
@@jbw3 The ‘early’ chronology is presented most expertly in it. The technology is very important in trying to work out who is the Exodus king was.
@cesariglesias297
5 ай бұрын
So where in Exodus is the name of the ruler that Moses know personally in the Egyptian court? We got Egyptian texts of Paid sick days and physicians at work: ancient Egyptians had state supported health care but who care about the Egyptian texts?
@TheBillABCTV
6 ай бұрын
The bible is true.
@prasanthyerramsetti9257
5 ай бұрын
Then quran is True Torah is True every religious book is True
@TheBillABCTV
5 ай бұрын
@@prasanthyerramsetti9257 Not so mate.
@prasanthyerramsetti9257
5 ай бұрын
@@TheBillABCTV this is called hippocracy... Bible is just history of Israelis not that you think religious book... It's just history of jews nothing to do with other countries... There is no phylosophy
@gabrielleangelica1977
5 ай бұрын
@@TheBillABCTVThe Bible is fiction.
@LawlChosenOne
5 ай бұрын
@@prasanthyerramsetti9257 Mohammad was a false prophets
@blibs67
3 ай бұрын
At that time, Egypt wasn't even called Egypt, to start with...
@samchs222
6 ай бұрын
I am about to start listening to this. From what I have read from historians, the Egyptians did not document any history that made them look weak.
@kevinkleinsasser9387
6 ай бұрын
That is correct.
@steveOCalley
6 ай бұрын
@@kevinkleinsasser9387Based on…?
@kevinkleinsasser9387
6 ай бұрын
@@steveOCalley Based on known fact and history.
@steveOCalley
6 ай бұрын
@@kevinkleinsasser9387How do I know you’re not completely fabricated this tale?
@kevinkleinsasser9387
6 ай бұрын
@stevevaughn8428 I'm not. I get it from historians. But don't ask me for names. If I see a subject I'm interested in on KZitem or wherever, I have a listen or read.
@WalterRMattfeld
28 күн бұрын
(03 September 2024) How does one identify the Egyptian and Biblical Context of the Exodus? Note the events appearing in the Bible's Exodus then see if there is in Egyptian Annals a parallel. If a parallel is found, then we have a match-up between Egypt and the Bible. Bible Events: (1) A large group of non-Egyptians is expelled from Egypt. (2) This group is residing in Goshen, the north eastern Delta. (3) This group is headed for Canaan upon being expelled. (4) Pharaoh changes his mind and pursues after Israel. (5) Pharaoh catches up with Israel. (6) A battle ensues between Pharaoh and Israel. Egyptian parallels: (1) Pharaoh Ahmose I expels thousands of Asiatic Hyksos from Egypt ca. 1550 BC. (2) Hyksos are concentrated at Avaris in northeastern Delta (the Bible's Goshen). (3) Hyksos return to their homeland, Syria/Canaan. (4) Ahmose I changes his mind and pursues after the Hyksos. (5) Ahmose catches up with the Hyksos. (6) Ahmose engages the Hyksos in a battle near Gaza at Sharuhen. THE KEY EVENT FOR ME: (4) PHARAOH CHANGING HIS MIND AND PURSUING ISRAEL AFTER SHE HAS LEFT EGYPT IS MET WITH AHMOSE CHASING AFTER THE HYKSOS WHILE THEY RETURN TO CANAAN. The Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (ca. 70 AD) in his History of the Jews opined that Manetho's mention of a Hyksos Expulsion was probably the Egyptian version of Israel's Exodus under Moses. I understand that Josephus was right, because of the above "match-ups" in the Egyptian annals of Pharaoh Ahmose I. Recently, Professor Donald B. Redford , an Egyptologist, opined that the Hyksos Expulsion was what was behind Israel's Exodus (cf. pp. 412-413. Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times. Princeton University Press. 1992. pp.412-413 "There is only one chain of historical events that can accommodate this late tradition, and that is the Hyksos descent and occupation of Egypt...in fact it is in the Exodus account that we are confronted with the Canaanite version of this event...In sum, therefore, we may state that the memory of the Hyksos expulsion did indeed live on in the folklore of the Canaanite population..."
@petermorton301
3 ай бұрын
The ancient Hebrew's were never slaves in ancient Egypt/Kush
@masada2828
Ай бұрын
The Pharaoh of Moses (1446bc), perished at the Red Sea crossing, his first born son, perished, his government & army were drowned, the Egyptian economy was destroyed. Egypt was left without a King while his widow had to appeal to the Hittites for a husband to give her an heir.
@SpotterVideo
6 ай бұрын
The real Mount Sinai has now been discovered in Arabia. (See Paul’s words in Gal. 4:25) The land of Midian is found on old maps in Northwest Arabia. Jethro the father-in-law of Moses was a priest of "Midian". Did the name "Moses" come from the name of a Pharoah named "Thutmose"? (There are several KZitem videos about the real Mount Sinai in Arabia.) Recently a small Lead “Curse Tablet” was discovered at Mount Ebal, which proves the Israelites had a written language during the time of Joshua. An Egyptian scarab of a Pharoah was also found at this site.
@jeyaandraiah8948
4 ай бұрын
The Egyptians claimed Mount Sinai was theirs. You're right. I'm gonna do some research on this. thanks.
@James-u6i9f
14 күн бұрын
Atheist gets help from SOME modern technology. GOD'S PEOPLE'S GETS KNOWLEDGE FROM BIBLE... which is true and always BE.......
@NeheC7
6 ай бұрын
Not true: The unbroken African Kings list never shows any Nysut Bty (Pharaoh) who was drowned. The Israelite Stele is of misread and Hyksos means foreign rulers not a group of Hebrews. Slaves never built anything in Kemet (Egypt) this was a natural building project actually recorded. We can actually read the Mdw Ntr (Ancient African Hieroglyphs.) So-called Hebrews wrote themselves into African history much later..
@PJRayment
6 ай бұрын
"The unbroken African Kings list never shows any Nysut Bty (Pharaoh) who was drowned." Given that neither this video nor the Bible claims that one was, what's your point? "Slaves never built anything in Kemet..." Again, who claimed that they did? The claim is that they made bricks, not that they built things with them. "So-called Hebrews wrote themselves into African history much later.." No, the Bible is a record from the time.
@Chrislyn-u5e
6 ай бұрын
With regards to the apparent mispronunciation of the early Egyptians identifying the people conquering the surrounding provinces as Abrews or Habrews I believe is actually accurate and not a nick name as Gary suggests. There's some evidence & some that believe that earlier Hebrew dialects had no e-sound and was a later addition. Thus it's entirely possible that the Egyptians merely called the Hebrews what they called themselves nl. HABROOS (עִברִית). Even now, the spelling stays exactly the same regardless of pronuncing the he- or ha- sound which is otherwise determined by the context...
@brockdalton8641
6 ай бұрын
Outstanding! Thank you 😊
@RustyWalker
3 ай бұрын
No, but some Semitic groups were. There could never have been 3 million of them though along with all their livestock. That just isn't possible. The story could be a historical reversal of the expulsion of the Hyksos, ie, when they told the story later, they changed the fact that they'd been driven out to that they'd escaped slavery. The Hyksos were not slaves. They were Semites who ruled a corner of Egypt until they were forced to leave. I'm not aware of another group at that time period who fits the bill
@eileenmacdougall8945
6 ай бұрын
This is amazing information. Thank you.
@giovanni545
5 ай бұрын
Revelation 14:12 King James Version 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.
@khutsolewela2864
5 ай бұрын
the more i research this topic ,the more am skeptical i become! are they talking about religion or History ?
@Nixijokenzi
Ай бұрын
@@khutsolewela2864 both. History is just what has been recorded from the past. Religion is about belief. Religions are historically recorded. It is amazing what was recorded in the Bible.
@selpingos
6 ай бұрын
minute 19:11 tp 19:53 does not make sense because the 10th plague happened after Moses confronted Pharaoh. And the first born son would have been the first born of the Pharaoh that Moses encountered not the second born son. Please explain
@b_korthuis
6 ай бұрын
Normally the first born son becomes Pharaoh. However there is archeological evidence that the firstborn son of Thutmoses III died in his teens. Therefore the second born son Amenotep II was made king. And Amenotep II's firstborn son also died early, which means that if Amenotep II was Pharaoh at the time of the Exodus, he would not have died with the firstborn at the 10th plague. But his son would have died, causing the second born son to be the next Pharoah. Hopefully that clears up what this guy is saying a little better.
@selpingos
6 ай бұрын
@@b_korthuis ah thanks Brian but in the video it was mentioned that first born died in the 10 plagues. Thats what got me confused
@PJRayment
6 ай бұрын
@@selpingos "... in the video it was mentioned that first born died in the 10 plagues." No, that wasn't said. Yes, if you don't listen closely you could easily think that (as I did), but listening again, that's not what he said. He said that _if_ Thutmoses III's firstborn became pharaoh, he _would have_ died in the plague, but he didn't die in the plague, so we can conclude that Amenhotep II was not the first born. Which it turns out, was the case.
@bibbulmun777
5 ай бұрын
And Amenhotep II's first born son did not inherit the throne and could have died in the 10th plague.
@REktSigMa
5 ай бұрын
Of course the Israelites were in Egypt. How do you guys think Hagar got with Abraham's family? Hagar was the Egyptian princess.
@blackjaguarlord
5 ай бұрын
One question I've heard is, "Why aren't the pyramids mentioned in the Bible, especially if they were built (at least in part) by Israelite slaves?"
@Tiimeh
5 ай бұрын
Great question!!! And it is!!! Check out the pyramid of Saqqara. It is a pyramid which was used for MASS GRAIN storage. Check out Josephs story in the bible and youll join the dots. Ron Wyatt also disovered the chariots underwater and the true Mt Sinai ,AKA Jebel Al Lawz (does the word "Lawz" remind you of anything?). Now look at where the 'top experts' believe mt sinai to be and i will let you decide for yourself.
@cosmictreason2242
5 ай бұрын
They were not built by Hebrew slaves. They are hundreds of years earlier
@nob.s.top5comparablesb370
4 ай бұрын
🙌🏿🙌🏿
@Jenigami
4 ай бұрын
because they are only recording what is favorable to them
@nob.s.top5comparablesb370
4 ай бұрын
@@Jenigami Thank you! Well said!🙌🏿
@naturalstrongman81
8 күн бұрын
One particular Egyptian, Imohepth was 3,000 years old but the scorpion king predated him at least 2,000 years.
@lionmaster2845
5 ай бұрын
GOD IS ALIVE FOREVERMORE & HE is working in HISTORY... his explainaripn MAKES SENSE and ACCURATE... history is GOD'S footprints not in the sand...but in human civilization... GOD has SPOKEN thru this VIDEO!
@Jenigami
4 ай бұрын
there is no god in the bible
@geelb-fe7ef
4 ай бұрын
Would you Care to explain how exactly was Joseph the saviour of Egypt?
@coxfordGamer
Ай бұрын
That's easy God give dreams to the king that none of his men could tell, but Joseph did because of God revealed it to him and he told the king. Genesis shows us the story.
@geelb-fe7ef
Ай бұрын
@@coxfordGamer LoL,, The story where Joseph (no 'J' in the hebrew language) pitched his plan to pharaoh to buy up all the grain to cause a shortage in order to set the price. It's called commodity trading. How does starving people so you can get rich save them? 🤔🤔
@coxfordGamer
Ай бұрын
@geelb-fe7ef Joseph did not buy it the people did unto their money ran out then they sold for food, then they served for it.
@alicesimmons252
5 ай бұрын
Wonderful! Enlightening! Blessed! TRUTH! Thank you 🙂
@tbjr1127
5 ай бұрын
I just moved home to pay off debt over the next year. I gave up a good job to do so and I’m now living in a small town far from the beach in the cold but it’s just for a year and I’ll be better off for it.
@petermorton301
4 ай бұрын
The 4⃣ Hamitic-African's women's in Jesus/Yesus bloodline is Rahab, Tamar, Ruth, and Bathsheba. According to biblical anthropology and biblical scholars
@garyjaensch7143
15 күн бұрын
There is an astonishingly large number of Egyptian drawings etc that show giant people with little people, Emily teeter of Chicago University is curious why the ancient Egyptians worshiped kings , then later idols, Bible explains that, Emily is also curious why magnificent stone beer urns suddenly disappeared and rough clay ones suddenly appeared for 500 years, a worldwide flood only 8 people left and technology disappearing would explain that perfectly, and Bible says they had Iron before the history written by conquering Britain, and Dominic goerlitz ( athiest) confirmed this when he found iron plate and magnetite traces in the Giza pyramid, He like most who speak the truth got expelled, Dominic also proved the Egyptians ( or the Syrians that were mentioned in this video Hyksos) travelled to the Black Sea, he built a reed boat and did it? Well worth wondering why Egyptians are carved on the Hoysaleswara temple in India as well?? Anglican, catholic Muslim, Hindu conquerers have hidden history maybe??? Jesus did not kill his enemies that killed him, or do violence to any man ,we are supposed to follow his example, conquerers certainly don’t, do they? Proverbs 20:22 “Say not thou, I will recompense evil; but wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.” Romans 12:17 “Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.” Psalms 90:4 “For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.” 2 Peter 3:8 “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.” 1 Peter :2:21 “For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously: Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed. Matthew 10:16 “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.” 1 Corinthians 14:20 “Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in understanding be men.” John 13:34 “A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.” Luke 3:14 “And the soldiers likewise demanded of him, saying, And what shall we do? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither accuse any falsely; and be content with your wages.” Isaiah 53:9 “And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.” 1 Thessalonians 5:15 “See that none render evil for evil unto any man; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all men.” Proverbs 20:22 “Say not thou, I will recompense evil; but wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.” Romans 12:17 “Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.” Hosea 12:10 “I have also spoken by the prophets, and I have multiplied visions, and used similitudes, by the ministry of the prophets.” 1 John 2:6 “He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked.”
@rhondaenglish4022
Ай бұрын
My ancestors are screaming for justice against crimes against all nations religions !!! Stop evil. Please. One NATION PRAYING for humanity's sake. ❤. Power prayers for all nations children. We've seen enough. ❤.
@litianaraibevu1217
5 ай бұрын
I believe what the bible says Hebrews 😅were in Egypt
@josiepens4480
4 ай бұрын
No they weren't. It's all an elaborate story.
@netsiteing
5 ай бұрын
Recommend looking at “Patterns of Evidence” film series and look at few lectures by Egyptologist David Rohl on the topic
@JRTIGER07
6 ай бұрын
❤ *Praise the LORD* ❤
@terrancelancaster5789
17 күн бұрын
Thanks for saying our names, right? Yes, we are the Hebrews, We were never slaves in Egypt. And the man you called Moses who is Moshe, well he was actually Akhenaten I hate to say this ,but white people don't know our history please stop telling my family history ask us please and thankyou.
@toxicblackwidow9841
4 ай бұрын
Another biblical channel tailored to meet the expectations of believers...
@lifeabundant3
5 ай бұрын
Blind brains......
@harryharry87
4 ай бұрын
The guest refers to ancient Egyptian but doesn’t address their ethnicity… Who were the indigenous people of Egypt? Look up the hieroglyph for the word face….!! And see what you find….why would a Hyksos Pharoh present Joseph with a Cushite(black woman) as a wife. Biblical scholars always refer to ancient Egyptian architecture but what about their medicine, pharmacology and mathematics and writing system. And how about Egyptian laws of Myaat…(they predated the Ten Commandments) or the facts that abstinence from pork and circumcision were Egyptian customs. And there was also monotheism in Egypt. Remember the Israelites only numbered about 70 people when they arrived to Egypt. They remained there for 400 yrs…. That’s a long time….They numbered in the millions when they left…..
@ka-sekham2439
4 ай бұрын
Egyptians called them Aamu. That means Aramean Asiatic 😂 Aamu was the contemporary term used to distinguish the people of Avaris, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, from Egyptians. ... Contemporary Egyptians during the Hyksos invasion designated them as hikau khausut, which meant "rulers of foreign countries", a term that originally only referred to the ruling caste of the invaders. Aamu was the contemporary term used to distinguish the people of Avaris, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, from Egyptians. Egyptologists conventionally translate aamu as "asiatics" The Jewish historian, Josephus, in his Contra Apionem, claims that Manetho was the first to use the Greek term, Hyksos, incorrectly translated as "shepherd-kings However, today the term Hyksos has come to refer to the whole of these people who ruled Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt's ancient history, and had to be driven out of the land by the last ruler of the 17th Dynasty and the earliest ruler of Egypt's New Kingdom. Josephus claims to quote directly from Manetho, who's original history is lost to us, when he describes the conquest and occupation of Egypt by the Hyksos: "By main force they easily seized it without striking a blow; and having overpowered the rulers of the land, they hen burned our cities ruthlessly, razed to the ground the temples of gods...Finally, they appointed as king one of their number whose name was Salitis." Some of this rings true, while other parts seem not to be. It appears that the Hyksos left much of Egypt alone. It is clear that Avaris (Tell el-Dab'a) was occupied by a people who exhibited specifically non-Egyptian cultural traits. We find this in the layout of the town itself, the houses, and particularly the burials, which were intermixed with the living community, unlike those of the Egyptians. While we know that the Hyksos established centers, as their influenced gradually moved towards Memphis along the eastern edge of the Delta, at Farasha, Tell el-Sahaba, Bubastis, Inshas and Tell el-Yahudiyas, very little of this particular culture has been found at other Egyptian sites. At the same time, the Hyksos living in Egypt have been described as "Peculiarly Egyptian".
@gissie391
Ай бұрын
Yes cause Aram is Syria ,it would be superb if the scribes kept old names and wrote a glossary im always wondering where Nabstians came from and old names like Tubal cain etc were.A book about "propheten "tells me about a sarcochphogas?for Joseph ? Im going back to look at book again.
@BornAgain87
25 күн бұрын
They never found a body in pyramids they were from the people before noah I reckon because the pyramids of giza are out of this world and there was a civilization then that build industrial civilizations. The Egyptians adopted them pyramids and built a new civilation. Because the pyramids of giza could not have been built with ropes and ramps.
@BahaaEldeen2008
4 ай бұрын
With all do respect; Old Egyptian history, The Tawrah and Bible are true and correct, but the stories of the holy scripts happened in a different lands, maybe Yemen. There is no pharaoh, Moses, Joseph or Abraham ever lived on the land of old Egypt. No evidences in Sinai, Red Sea or under the Al-Aqsa! Israel scientists been looking since 1967 for any shred of evidence. Misraeem or Misr is not Egypt.
@kofiarthur3749
5 ай бұрын
White People have badly pronounced all Ancient Egypt (Kemi) Black Pharoahs names. He pronounced "Arm ho sey (Ahmose) as Amose, they pronounced Ramseyounu as Ramse, Akufu or kuufu as Kufu, Aken ten as Akhenaten, Kari kari or keri keri as khakeri, Amofa as Mhofah, San kara as Sankhara, Asare as Asar etc They were wrong they tried to change the names to sound non African
@martinsibeanusi4317
4 ай бұрын
Yes it does because the Exodus happened and the Bible didn't explains much about the happenings in Egypt. The Ancient people of Egypt said the upper and lower Nile were one and then the lower part was conquered by foreign people called hyscos. They were the ones that enslaved the inhabitants of lower Egypt which goshen falls under. Pls Guys don't forget that the Children of Jacob became indigenous to Egypt through the help of Joseph. The identity and name of I zara eli (you answered the most high) corrupted to Israeli was formed and this led to the Exodus. The children of Jacob, Sumerians, Jebusites, Edomites, Hivites, Amorites and ancient Egyptian all left during the Exodus. The Modern day Arabs are the descendants of the Hyscos which are of Turkic origin from the caucaus mountains. They came through the levant conquering mesopatamia and its evirons. The eventually conquered lower Egypt.
Пікірлер: 1 М.