Honestly - In the business cases I've set up around Copilot, it doesn't require a lot of effectiveness to to do ROI on like 3-4 months even with a lot of licenses. Problem is - that the "time" saved from everyday optimization, isn't going back into the CFO pocket and that return on "more time for value adding work" will take a long time to show it's face 😅
@brightideasagency
2 күн бұрын
I think this is the key point. If you're lucky you find the salespeople with Copilot are just selling more, but in a lot of situations the return just isn't this straightforward. This is why I feel those more subjective outputs are valuable - do users *feel* this tool is helping them? Is it making them happier or more engaged? And how convinced are we that these sort of changes result in benefits down the road? My take is that these are the most important benefits, but many CFOs probably would have to be convinced. On the other hand though - showing a $30/mo impact with average salaries where they are isn't a high bar if that's the floor of what we need.
@wildfotoz
Күн бұрын
@@brightideasagency training is important. Without proper training, most people won't find it useful. Companies need to roll this out in small groups instead of all at once. Start with a pilot group and ramp it up from there.
@wildfotoz
2 күн бұрын
You answered the question in the first 2 minutes. People are using it on average of 1.2 hours per week. So, if someone is making more than 6.25 per hour, it's paying for itself because it costs 30 per month.
@brightideasagency
2 күн бұрын
It’s important to notes though that this time saving figure comes from Microsoft’s own research. Many organizations want more surety than just believing the selling points from the vendor.
Пікірлер: 6