*Inspire* : Give your *Overkill* minions *Reborn* Trump: *Gets brain aneurysm*
@admiraltonydawning3847
4 жыл бұрын
Even better: *Adapt* your *Overkill* minions.
@MmKayUltra1
4 жыл бұрын
Start of game: add reborn to your adapt pool
@kalkinzinsunpraiser1548
4 жыл бұрын
@@admiraltonydawning3847 Even better: Inspire : Give your reborn minions overkill : adapt your overkill minions
@0IIIIII
4 жыл бұрын
It is pretty confusing, in a real game it could be difficult to quickly read the card and understand what it does. Flavor of a convoluted card is also bad
@jonahascoli917
4 жыл бұрын
Kalkinzin Sun Praiser adapt your spellburst minions not your overkill minions
@AntoineBandele
4 жыл бұрын
I miss inspire.
@VoresD
4 жыл бұрын
Game is pretty uninspiring without it
@blueblue6111
4 жыл бұрын
Go wilf
@allhailderpfestor4839
4 жыл бұрын
Idk why they no longer use enrage and inspire when they still occasional use their effecys
@henrybottomsworth
3 жыл бұрын
TGT was the worst expansion in all of hearthstone in my opinion so i dont miss it at all
@claytonnewlon3747
3 жыл бұрын
@Antoine Bandele I didn’t expect to see my Avatar and Hearthstone fandoms collide haha.
@Burred11
4 жыл бұрын
What happened to "I will treat old keywords as if they were a part of the set the keyword came from"?
@Pikaton659
4 жыл бұрын
Or how about bothering to look at the icon of the cards at all? He only did it once here when it mattered on other cards. There was one properly marked Grand Tournament card, which he ignored being so and the Overkill card was Rastakhan's Rumble, which introduces a different issue in the fact that it was Dual Class.
@quirda77
4 жыл бұрын
Idk I think its kind of boring way to look at the card. Trump doesn't make these vids to often and I like to see these new ideas and how they would interact with newer decks and the different archetypes that evolved since. Also it just feels weird to say ok pretend all these new cards didn't exist and you didn't know about what future cards would say, now think back to a time during which you weren't even playing this game to a meta where this keyword was used and i will now rate it based on that. Trump seems to actively not be trying to dock inspire cards solely for having inspire which was the origin for why he placed that treat as the set rule to begin with is also why he probably stopped doing it.
@misterbin00
4 жыл бұрын
Since the actual game is bringing up old keyword effects I think Trump must also adapt this way.
@Alter292
4 жыл бұрын
I actually really like the flavor of Talent Recruiter. That one flavor-wise takes full advantage of the word inspire. I enjoy it a lot!
@shael4866
3 жыл бұрын
IDK, trump might forget
@tEspur
4 жыл бұрын
Trump: silence belongs to priest and demon hunter *sad Keeper of the Grove noises*
@genzo454
4 жыл бұрын
and Earthshock
@mancubwwa
4 жыл бұрын
@@genzo454 hoot hoot (a random Ironbeak Owl appears)
@panzerschliffehohenzollern4863
4 жыл бұрын
Spellbreaker: Am I a joke to you?
@mancubwwa
4 жыл бұрын
@@panzerschliffehohenzollern4863 I hate to break it to you, but spellbreaker was hall-of-famed
@connortodd4538
3 ай бұрын
@@panzerschliffehohenzollern4863 "Your magic will *not* save you!"
@Saphronite
4 жыл бұрын
Dr. Frankenfin was clearly a Murloc but it didn’t have the tribe tag
@IlyaKargin
4 жыл бұрын
They probably ignored this because otherwise it would activate itself as a murloc
@FardHast
4 жыл бұрын
@@IlyaKargin Have the text as "another murloc" like Primalfin Lookout.
@Kouterry
4 жыл бұрын
Its actually a race tag, in BG if you try to put a buff on the wrong creature type the game says Race. so its a Race, not a tribe.
@Bogiukas
4 жыл бұрын
This is a bit of a dilemma for the development of the card. Dr. Frankenstein was a man who made a monster. Shouldn't it, therefore, be a non-murloc that creates a murloc? But why does the card have such a good "evil scientist murloc" art then? But let's be fair, they probably just forgot.
@mancubwwa
4 жыл бұрын
@@Bogiukas but he doesn't create a murloc, he turns murloc into a monster (amalgam). So it fits perfectly.
@jackfelder2560
4 жыл бұрын
I hate the way hearthstone handles keywords. If a thing doesn’t need a keyword, don’t give it one. And if you create a keyword, use it consistently! It makes no sense to introduce a keyword for one expansion and otherwise write it out. You can argue that they’re doing t for flavor, but it’s overcomplicated and confusing.
@alexholker1309
4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Refusing to reuse keywords is terrible design: inconsistent wording implies inconsistent mechanics, which is bad for clarity.
@kamma333444
4 жыл бұрын
Plus, you can hover over a card to see what the keyword does. It's not like MtG, where you would have to actually memorize all the keywords. It's such a lazy excuse for a digital card game. Let alone if a card looks at a keyword for whatever reason.
@urielvilu
4 жыл бұрын
lol do you remember the "give a friendly minion *charge* it can't attack heroes this turn"?
@caret_shell
4 жыл бұрын
Keywords are a safety mechanism for unintended consequences. When Blizzard publishes a set that works around a certain keyword, the set of cards affected has clear boundaries, and they know exactly which interactions it will affect. If all keywords were replaced with generic text, there would be a greater likelihood that new powers will accidentally apply to older cards in unbalanced ways. Keywords seem like a perfectly natural way to control the scope of interactions, as well as to focus the theme of a set and to transition away from old themes and smoothly onto new ones.
@Swank96
4 жыл бұрын
What kind of arbitrary shit is it that you have to quotas on new mechanics and keep printing them continuously? Itd be so bloated and boring if every set had every mechanic.
@PenguinWithInternetAccess
4 жыл бұрын
I mean that custom card is still a better tribute to the series than everything J.K Rowling did those past few years
@copyrightstrike4666
4 жыл бұрын
Wizards used to teleport poop out of their bodies instead of going to the bathroom. They'd shit their pants repeatedly, only to flick their wands and make the poop go away while cleaning their undies. Fun stuff.
@joabpelling462
4 жыл бұрын
It’s funny because when I went through the subreddit 3 hours ago I saw a dual class card called Harry Potter
@richardbertrand9939
4 жыл бұрын
@@copyrightstrike4666 i mean if I could shit my pants and magic it away I would.
@thedkboyz
4 жыл бұрын
Dumbledore has a long foreskin. Very loose and wet
@22pokemaniac22
4 жыл бұрын
Kvothe Windrunner uot
@Demintika
4 жыл бұрын
*Start of game* : Get a random *keyword* from the past.
@luminemusic9430
4 жыл бұрын
I don’t even play hearstone any more And I still. Watch this series
@BK557SC
4 жыл бұрын
I dont do either but this clickbait was too strong.
@stryke-jn3kv
4 жыл бұрын
Yep, down to this, Vicious Sindicate, and Trolden only now.
@fredriddles1763
4 жыл бұрын
@Light Helios Ditto. Funnily enough Trumps videos got back into Legends of Runeterra after I quit all card games for a long while xD.
@febothesir
4 жыл бұрын
same bro
@benroberts1052
4 жыл бұрын
But... this was so obviously a joke.
@dietaube6898
4 жыл бұрын
The way keywords are handled is ridiculous. "Oh noes, we cannot have too many keywords in our cycle, otherwise the tiny ratbrains of our customers will fry!". Meanwhile nobody gives a shit in Wild.
@robm6726
4 жыл бұрын
Wild is where the real long time players reside. Our old cards do not become worthless and keeps cost down.
@keivarae26
4 жыл бұрын
I know right trump is sort of wrong
@prussia9255
4 жыл бұрын
This is the same guy who, in the same video, said it's ok for cards like Zephyrs to exist. A card you essentially have to google to understand and use properly at a high level. It's pretty clear he just blindly follows Blizzard ideology on card creation.
@ishga1407
4 жыл бұрын
@@prussia9255 Blizzard's design philosophy affects how likely a card could actually make it into hearthstone, regardless how good or bad such philosophy is. Trump likes to dock design points for cards that aren't likely to make it into hearthstone, hence why even a Harry Potter or League of Legends flavored card would be a concern for him.
@prussia9255
4 жыл бұрын
@@ishga1407 He doesn't consistently do that, and if he did he would reference it more often. He's said that a few time in the series, sure, but I mean even look at this video. He rated the priest-paladin duel class card low in design because it gave paladin silence, when the card "coerce" exists, which gives warrior combo. Silence is available in multiple classes and in neutral whereas combo is probably the most class unique keyword in the game. If coerce can exist, how is that card not able to. Besides how can you rate cards off Blizzard's design policy when it's constantly changing. There have been plenty of expansions where Blizzard tore down previous rules about class identity, giving minion classes, keywords, etc, to classes that never had those things. By that logic, Trump should never be able to say something is not in theme for a class. Besides, Blizzard contradicts themselves constantly. Trying to keep things simple for new players and then printing Zephyrs is probably the best example.
@loknaz97
4 жыл бұрын
I dont see the problem with having old Tags on cards, its just a way to shorten the amount of card text needed to explain an effect. Trumps only problem with most of the cards seem to be that the Tag is there, no that it has the effect.
@masterplusmargarita
4 жыл бұрын
It's more of a problem with accessibility. Imagine being a new player coming into the game as it is now, except Dragonbane says Inspire. It's the only card in standard with the keyword, so you're not going to know what it does until you mouse over for the tooltips, which is not necessarily something a new player would know to do. Keywords only make sense when there's a lot of cards that have them. It's why "Enrage" got turned into "does X while damaged".
@thealmightybeaver9977
4 жыл бұрын
@@masterplusmargarita correct me if i'm wrong, but doesn't it say somewhere in the tutorial that you can hover over cards to see what they do?
@prussia9255
4 жыл бұрын
@@masterplusmargarita "which is not necessarily something a new player would know to do" I guess they're screwed then because there are plenty of evergreen and set specific keywords they're going to have to learn anyway.
@Dexiteo
4 жыл бұрын
New players already need to learn what Battlecry, Deathrattle, Combo, Discover, Divine Shield, Freeze, Lifesteal, Outcast, Rush, Charge, Secret, Silence, Stealth, Spell Damage, Taunt, Overload and Windfury do (+ current keywords). Adding a few more is not going to change anything
@31codyskater
4 жыл бұрын
@@Dexiteo it does reach a point of critical mass of being too much at a certain point. yes there are lots of keywords but there is difference of say 20 keywords to say 50. and when you have a set with one random one off cards with a keyword then it kinda is pointless for standard players to learn another whole keyword for some one random card. and then do that again for most sets and maybe even multiple times for just one card that has it. heartstones thing is that it is very user friendly and easy to jump into so the lower the bar you can set for new players the better. as a veteran player you can just go ya thats one of those things i know no big deal but when your new learning all these new things at ounce can be over whelming. that's one of the main problems with yugioh.
@jeromefournier9667
4 жыл бұрын
Keyword creep is the absolute most idiotic reason to turn short consistent wording into long inconsistent wording I have ever heard... seriously it's like saying "Damn we have too much technology, we have to stop using some of it because it's too complicated!" just asinine.
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
No, it isn't. Having one standard legal card with a certain keyword is no more intuative for a new or casualplayer, than just describing what the card does, particularly when it doesn't use the flavor from the set the keyword originated in. And it just makes it more confusing, when you don't know what the keyword means. Every TCG understands this, which is why they don't use non-evergreen keywords in their new sets.
@somerandomgamer8504
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS Inspire might as fucking well be evergreen, since so many sets have hero power interactions. Shit like Magnetic and Echo, fine. But Inspire? Fuck right off with "After you use your Hero Power".
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
@@somerandomgamer8504 That's another question, whether they should make it evergreen, but then there should be at least a handful of cards per set that have it. And it's flavor is pretty specific to TGT, so I wouldn't personally want that.
@jeromefournier9667
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS It's even easier for a digital CCG, you can just put a pop up description in the card collection, hell you can put it in during thew actual game if you want AND most of the cards action are done by the game, that limits a lot of what the player need to understand about an abilities mechanics.
@enjoshi-godrez8775
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS Your argument is well and truly eviscerated by the fact that you can hover over or click a card to read its key words. You literally dont have an argument, go home.
@MeBomb1
4 жыл бұрын
In regards to Talent Recruiter, it has the TGT icon behind the text, implying the card would be something that released alongside the Inspire keyword. Didn't Trump say something about that before and mentioned that, if the icon was appropriate, there would be zero issues with the keyword/design?
@somerandomgamer8504
4 жыл бұрын
Trump is about as consistent as Blizzard.
@roycohen9627
4 жыл бұрын
Lmao i commented this on the stream when he reviewed those cards and he said he doesn't care it has the TGT set icon
@roycohen9627
4 жыл бұрын
*that it has
@prussia9255
4 жыл бұрын
@@somerandomgamer8504 true
@31codyskater
4 жыл бұрын
ya but here he was saying how he is changing that rule cause honestly trying to pretend what the card would be like in a years old meta is pointless. he basically said i won't dock points from it for the key words anymore by pretending they are not key words. and he does honestly have a valid point if we like it or not that their are certain rules in place about keeping a certain level of simplicity in heartstone by not having too many key words at 1 time. people being able to change their mind on how they do things isn't a crime and can be for the better and in this case i think it's definitely for the better.
@Walterion
4 жыл бұрын
9:27 one of the design stars had enough of Trump's explanation and went on vacation.
@chidzhustle3570
4 жыл бұрын
3:23 but if the original card said “be REBORN in the Phylactery” trump would’ve said “it’s too confusing” and dock points for design
@ascii_9727
4 жыл бұрын
Well... Has he ever done that? The closest I can think of is when he docks points off of matrioshka carts that do too many things
@fledbeast5783
4 жыл бұрын
AsCii_ Yeah, with I forget which, but it was some pirate. Whenever a pirate died they “join the crew” and whenever this minion died the crew would be unleashed, which trump really didn’t like
@jamesgaiser5982
4 жыл бұрын
That card said something to the effect of "Whenever a pirate dies while this is in your hand, it joins the crew. Battlecry: summon the crew." It could just be "Battlecry: summon all pirates that died when this card was in your hand." The flavor text made it longer and more convoluted instead of shrinking the text.
@ishga1407
4 жыл бұрын
There are also some cards with this type of texts he did not dock points for. It really comes down to if he finds them intuitive or not
@riverbirch2631
4 жыл бұрын
poor rusted reimpforcement, losing a star midway through without being acknowledged, the star lost to time
@andurea3009
4 жыл бұрын
Honestly that card is pure hot garbage, i think it would never see play even in a Mech-based meta
@raver377
4 жыл бұрын
you overlooked one of the issues with dr frankenfin: it says "if youre overloaded and control A MURLOC transform IT into..." shouldnt it be "battlecry if youre overloaded transform one of your murlocs into a..." with the original effect it doesnt hint at the fact that its targeted or random. cards that have any text with "IT" are never requirements its always "if you draw a card transform IT into.." or "if you play a ... give IT ..." etc but "IT" doesnt work as a requirement in the card text. if you have multiple murlocs does it transform a random one? is it targeted? does it transform all murlocs on your board? the card doesnt say
@TheAce12570
4 жыл бұрын
You're right, it's worded super poorly. I actually thought it transforms Frankenfin himself at first.
@theodoremurdock9984
4 жыл бұрын
It should say “Battlecry: if you’re overloaded, transform a friendly murloc into...”. The fact that you have to have a friendly murloc to target should just be implied, like it is for any other targeted battlecry.
@raver377
4 жыл бұрын
@@theodoremurdock9984 yes thats exactly what i meant. i didnt mean that it should say target in the text but that it should indeed be implied like all battlecries are was my point
@keivarae26
4 жыл бұрын
It doesnt feel like a legendary murlocs need better murlocs
@TheAce12570
4 жыл бұрын
Keivarae Badie both Murloc Paladin as well as Murloc Shaman are pretty weak right now, neither would be overpowered with the addition of a card like this.
@dragonkingofthestars
4 жыл бұрын
I seriously don't get why you don't like reusing old keywords. They should be used all the time, Dragbon bane Should be inspire, BECAUSE THAT'S IT'S EFFECT, and to keep it simple,
@ColgatetheTogekiss
4 жыл бұрын
I mean, he doesnt take off points from it, they're just a dead keyword for one reason or another. If blizzard printed those cards, they wouldnt have the keyword
@dragonlogos1
4 жыл бұрын
It is so there is only a few keywords at a time my guess is that the devs actually try to keep only something like 10 keywords in standard at a time so they rotate the whole keyword (i mean they limit deck slots under similar reasoning) but I think that trump misses the idea of Sequel expansions If you think we are never returning to ungro and Adapting again you’re crazy.
@derrilazkia1002
4 жыл бұрын
A lone "inspire" Keyword in a set full of spellburst would definitely confuse newcomer
@Jbob1917
4 жыл бұрын
@t'3' isnt the point of having a virtual card game to allow things like hovering over a card to see what it does? Seems like an easy solution🤔
@Bodaggnsalod
4 жыл бұрын
Imagine being new to Hearthstone and having to learn like 20 keywords at once.
@L0LWTF1337
4 жыл бұрын
We are reaching levels of clickbait that should not be possible!
@emmah1408
4 жыл бұрын
Yup
@h3110legomaster
4 жыл бұрын
mans is just tryna chase the bag
@andremaldonado7410
4 жыл бұрын
I mean is it really clickbait tho? We got a horcrux card reviewed did we not?
@user-kb7kf4vu2u
4 жыл бұрын
Hey, if it helps my boy Trump pay the rent I'm cool with it
@enzoaugusto1577
4 жыл бұрын
Idk, people say anything is clickbait. The title is obviously a joke, or did anyone really think jk would sue custom hs?
@vitordarksider
4 жыл бұрын
Since the amount of card text is a problem, using "inspire" is honestly better than "after you use your hero power". Imo Dragonbane should just have inspire too.
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
But casual players or people who didn't play back aren't gonna know what inspire means, thereby adding confusion and keyword cluttering, by adding a keyword to a set for only one standard legal minion.
@SomersBugtopia
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS When you hover over a card in your hand, on the board or in your collection it teaches you the keywords. That would also only confuse a small amount of players who don't use the function and for some reason just ignore a new keyword only once for each of those people. I'd gladly take a single mistake from oblivious players and have a cleaner design space that opens up more card text and more ideas.
@SomersBugtopia
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS This exact design limitation is why we have a comically confusing card with Charge for Warrior. Imagine if that whole line of text with all those bizarre interactions just said "give a minion Rush" What's more confusing?
@JohnyFirst
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS When you hover over cards, keywords are explained in small boxes next to them. If you can't figure that out, maybe don't play games :/
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
@@JohnyFirst stop being a dick because you cant understand a game design concept
@TheNegronomicon
4 жыл бұрын
Keywords should definitely be used because the game has tooltips for them when you hover over a card. As long as cards don't have more than two then it should be fine.
@mattgopack7395
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I don't understand the argument that 'Keyword Bloat' is a problem (especially since you can just hover over it, like you say), but adding in vague wording that doesn't even show up on a hover isn't. The argument makes a lot more sense in a physical card game, but then you wouldn't want the latter either. They should just re-use the keywords when they pop up.
@slashsight6577
4 жыл бұрын
@@mattgopack7395 I mean heck, on a technicality Battlecry is a keyword as well, and so is Rush and Charge and Silence and Lifesteal and Taunt. They're not a part of a specific set but still, they're keywords. They prevent a wall of text on a card if you want a specific effect that aligns with others of its kind. And besides, Inspire is used as flavor for the cards, like we even see on one of the cards here. Dragonbane is just a weapon, it cant be inspired, and Extra Arms has a ton of uniqueness.
@adammat13
4 жыл бұрын
@Korbin Wasilewski Battlecry, deathrattle and other such keywords are called evergreen keywords, meaning that it's decide that these keywords will see print in basically every set. (Charge is a exception since rush has taken it's place) And if you are going for the flavor argument then the "horcrux" card should not have inspire either since a book/item cannot be inspired
@quantummidget
3 жыл бұрын
Al'Akir enters the chat
@magikmilk2343
4 жыл бұрын
Dude needs to get over his fear of old keywords. Microknight and Talent Recruiter were both designed for a competition where the secondary challenge was to be "The Grand Tournament" related... so Inspire was valid for the design.
@maxchenmusterhausen5311
4 жыл бұрын
The moment a guy wishes to remove keywords and lay out long texts because "too complicated" where as good card-games always rely on keywords. Magic is using them since forever, they serve a clear purpose and magic doesnt even have a floating digital text-box for you to read up on what any given keyword does because its mostly a physical cardboard game. lets be real here: if hearthstone really gets to "complicated" because someone has to read a keyword in game in a round with an opponent, you can pack the game and leave it. its implies you never read a card your opponent is playing, which is...what card-games are and you can never expect anyone to know every card. By that logic, no card should ever have text again. It just boggles my mind in terms of design to condem keywords. This is not a game for babies, mostly grown or young adults are playing it - and they are fukkin able to read.
@calebbarnhouse496
3 жыл бұрын
bigger then that he literally says they should just make the text longer and more confusing to make it better
@TheProgenitor
4 жыл бұрын
The flavor of Turn Undead is actually exactly how the ability works in DnD 5e. It silences (frightens) target undead, becomes Destroy Undead when specific conditions are met, and it's Twinspell because Clerics have 2 uses of their Channel Divinity, which they spend to use Turn Undead. The paladin flavor is still bad though because paladins don't have Turn Undead.
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
Frighten and Silence are very different things, probably more akin to making it dormant for 2 turns. And I kinda agree with the Destroy Undead part, except the condition is it having a Deathrattle effect, instead of say, its mana cost.
@nickdumas2495
4 жыл бұрын
Surely Turn Undead doesn't also deal heavy damage to living creatures like that card does?
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
@@nickdumas2495 Exactly.
@TheProgenitor
4 жыл бұрын
Alright let's not nitpick this too hard lmao. Turn Undead traditionally *only* affects undead creatures, but its not like Hearthstone has an Undead tribe. And even if it did, if this card only affected such a tribe, it'd be worthless. You gotta bend the knee somewhere along the line to synergize with the game mechanics
@nickdumas2495
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheProgenitor I'd suggest "Destroy all deathrattle minions", or perhaps "remove deathrattles from all minions on the board" to come at it from the other direction. Simply leave the normals alone but increase the power of the anti-deathrattle idea.
@nandoPluister
4 жыл бұрын
But the creators added the right expansion logo as if it was a card from that expansion. If they use the wrong expansion sure, but this was just nitpicking
@mehakwahla5633
4 жыл бұрын
Inspire: Adapt your Echo minions Trump: Dies
@MikeCOYS
4 жыл бұрын
Sometimes Trump's reviews are way too harsh, and quite bias. Some of the cards rated poorly would easily make it to the game, and also there are way more busted cards in the game right now.
@Barely_Edited
4 жыл бұрын
Not sure exactly what you mean by biased here? How is he biased against these cards I’m sure trump would happily admonish blizz for some of the cards already in the game as well lmao, he’s not rating these on how likely they are to be in the game either
@MikeCOYS
4 жыл бұрын
@@Barely_Edited Bias as in instead of rating it fairly and neutrally, he sometimes decrease the rating because it doesn't suit his taste. No, he's just using the cards from the game as a point of reference, not for the likelihood for it to be added to the game.
@quirda77
4 жыл бұрын
You do know reviews are biased right? Cause it has his opinion put into it? and because of that he's allowed to choose how he rates the cards. If he doesn't want to review them based on likeliness of being added he doesn't have to or need to. Also you say you want his rating to be fair, but he tries to use current in game cards as a standard to validate his ratings so that don't seem completely arbitrary so I don't get how they are unfair when he tries to stay consistent with how he judges them. He even stopped taking points off outright for having inspire and just judge the card based on howfavorable it seems and how well the card is designed.
@ishga1407
4 жыл бұрын
You do realize custom card reviews are all about his opinions, and are supposed to be biased towards his taste? That's kind of the whole point?
@MikeCOYS
4 жыл бұрын
@@ishga1407 Sure, to a degree. Imagine you just had the best pizza in your life, but instead of rating it 5 stars, you gave it 4 stars because 1 of the pepperoni wasn't positioned in the spot you'd have liked. I mean, I get it but doesn't take away from the fact that it's still harsh. Don't forget, 1 star is worth 20%, that's a massive deduction for something so minor.
@trillong
4 жыл бұрын
I think if Mage can have a combo card, then paladin can have a silence card. I don't really understand that critique of turn undead.
@omega6superpower125
4 жыл бұрын
also shaman have a choose one card now...(druid stuff)
@tarille1043
4 жыл бұрын
On Turn Undead: "Silence is a Priest and Demon Hunter thing" Earth Shock, Keeper of the Grove and Ironbeak Owl disagree. Also, 2 neutral cards with Silence (Light's Champion and Shieldbreaker) depict *Paladins*
@vanblod9338
4 жыл бұрын
And what about the overloaded druid/shaman card? Or the combo rogue/mage card? If blizzard officially prints cards that share a mechanic *one* class gets, I think Turn Undead is just fine.
@thebigyes8482
4 жыл бұрын
Tarille I believe the OG spellbreaker is also a paladin
@cuttsy204
4 жыл бұрын
Could an alternative to the card be: deal 4 damage to a minion, if it kills a minion with death rattle, negate the effect
@vanblod9338
4 жыл бұрын
@@cuttsy204 I think that is too hyper-specific for a class card. It'd be great on a neutral card though. Battlecry deal 4 damage to a minion, if it dies do not trigger any deathrattle effects or something. Gotta totally redesign the card to be a minion tho!
@arturogarrido7324
4 жыл бұрын
@@cuttsy204 nope, 1 mana deal 4 damage is insane, even more with twinspell
@robertlupa8273
4 жыл бұрын
"Hearthstone cards should be limited to 4 lines of text" *laughs in other languages*
@gabrielcolodner4482
4 жыл бұрын
Blizzard should use the keywords that they already make, for me at least, doesn't have any sense make a keyword and later just write the whole text when a keyword is used for that, reduce the amount of text
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
Having one standard legal card with a certain keyword is no more intuative for a new or casualplayer, than just describing what the card does, particularly when it doesn't use the flavor from the set the keyword originated in. And it just makes it more confusing, when you don't know what the keyword means. Every TCG understands this, which is why they don't use non-evergreen keywords in their new sets.
@gabrielragum
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS I mean, there is a popup that explains the keyword for a reason... I also don't see a problem with having keywords in this case. What I find most confusing is the few inconsistent cases, like Charged Devilsaur, whose's text is "Charge. Battlecry: can't attack heroes this turn", which is essentialy rush, but with some hidden mechanics, like when you copy it, you can actually go face in the same turn.
@andurea3009
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS well in Hs it's a bit different, since you can read the effect of the keywords on the side of a card. Also, your statement that TCGs never reuse old non-evergreen keywords is partially untrue; In MTG, for example, they reused a mechanic called "kicker"(a very old mechanic that they used sometimes during the game's history) in the last expansion (Zendikar's Rising)
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
@@gabrielragum Sure, I know almost all the keywords in Magic the Gatherng's 20+ year history, but that's because I'm a dedicated fan. But they don't return a 20 year old obscure mechanic's name, just because a standard legal card has a similar ability. And the same goes for HS. There's no reason to return old keywords, if it's only for 1 card in standard.
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
@@andurea3009 Indeed, as a SET mechanic, not for a singular card. If they just had a random card with kicker that would be weird, but having kicker return on 20+ cards makes a lot of sense.
@Nooctae
4 жыл бұрын
Hearthstone would be a better game if Keywords never went away and we just kept them along the way. It's such a stupid reasonning to push them away. Mechanics are mechanics. >
@Hephaestus_God
4 жыл бұрын
Why do you not like Inspire over the "After you use your heropower"?... I think it is way better as it declutters the text. I never did like the spelt out version. I think every keyword should be in the game at once, even if you put them in it is not a lot compared to other card games, and is not that difficult to learn.
@GameWiz1305
4 жыл бұрын
I think your criticism of old keywords doesn’t hold up. You even show evidence why keywords are necessary when it takes the place of lines of text. The whole point is to simplify the card text.
@sunbleachedangel
4 жыл бұрын
Because that's exactly why card games add keywords, to use them exactly once and never use them again or sometimes use them but as clunky text. Team5 genius strikes again
@TrimutiusToo
4 жыл бұрын
Talent recruiter actually has tournament watermark so inspire is fine
@roniusadethel9768
4 жыл бұрын
Look, in Hearthstone if you don't know what a keyword does you mouse over it. A new player will have no idea what Rush and Charge do, they learn by reading the tooltip on the card or playing the card and seeing what it does.
@Barely_Edited
4 жыл бұрын
Having craploads of keywords isn’t helpful when the keyword is only appearing one or two times in standard Having the only standard card with _Inspire_ being Dragonsbane is just weird and unhelpful. Keeping keyword bloat down lowers the entry barrier for the game and doesn’t negatively effect anything. Maybe MAYBE it could change when it rotates but it’s just as easy to not force newer to players to mouse over every card with an old mechanic. It also works thematically for having sets centre around a keyword. A squire can be inspired by your hero - a giant crossbow cannot...
@chaisemaurice8150
4 жыл бұрын
Right? It's not MGT where I need to break out the guide when I run into a new keyword. They need to remember, having a digital format doesn't mean finding more and more ways to generate cards.
@derrilazkia1002
4 жыл бұрын
@@Barely_Edited Yeah for flavor reasons, I agree. For Dragonbane, your hero power function as a command for the Dragonbane crew to shoot. A Ballista can't be inspired indeed.
@Luna-wf5ok
4 жыл бұрын
The only thing Rowling hates more than that card is trans people
@SuperEggsNBacon
4 жыл бұрын
Luna TRUE
@hanyuzhu7276
4 жыл бұрын
Based Rowling
@AvelineMelena
4 жыл бұрын
"You could just replace this with the full text" But that's dumb ! It's better to just have a keyword for real, they're not hard to remember, there isn't a billion of them.
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
his whole point is that if you do that then eventually theres a ton of them and many of them represent very few cards in standard, making them hard to remember
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
Using the Inspire keyword in a standard legal set, when it would be the only card in the format with that keyword, wouldn't make any sense, and would be confusing for casual and new players.
@azalakhir918
4 жыл бұрын
@@RasmusVJS About 9/10 custom cards wouldnt make sense if they were added in without other cards that fit its theme.
@RasmusVJS
4 жыл бұрын
@@azalakhir918 But this is still relevant for the ones that do.
@Depressed_Spider
4 жыл бұрын
It's completely retarded. How many more cards with elusive does Blizzard want to print until it actually becomes a keyword instead of a long text? There's a keyword for ONE card: Counter. Only one card has that. Be smart, be like Blizzard. Don't just say "Draw". Instead, say "Add the top card of your deck to your hand".
@rarristar
4 жыл бұрын
Honored Veteran 5 Mana. 5/4 *Rush,* *Echo* *Inspire:* *Adapt* this minion. *Overkill:* Give this minion *Reborn.*
@anon.8971
4 жыл бұрын
Mage, warlock and priest card
@gigachad982
4 жыл бұрын
No
@TrueWizard88
4 жыл бұрын
Transfer student also has inspire.
@CountFab
4 жыл бұрын
Only if you are playing wild can that occur, and in wild there is no such thing as limitation.
@bloodranger1188
4 жыл бұрын
Also that’s the direct flavour of the card
@promethiamoore6462
4 жыл бұрын
This doesn't have enough likes
@smit24gaming52
4 жыл бұрын
"Silence is only priest and Demon Hunter" Ironbeak Owl- "what the fuck?"
@corymargarucci
4 жыл бұрын
Trump makes me so mad with the old keywords. In one episode he said he'd "assume the cards are being printed in that set" and this was in like one of the first 20 or 30 episodes. I do not understand why he does not treat these cards as if they were just in that set like he said. He could then take of for design if they have like conflicting keywords, but he made the code himself and does not follow it.
@genericname4053
4 жыл бұрын
I think a better name for the first card would had been “Kel’Thuzad’s Phylactery”. Edit: I stopped the video too early. Lol
@TheRigby19
4 жыл бұрын
since it’s a warlock card “The Soulstone” maybe? Warlocks do use soulstones to res themselves as well as it costs them to make the soulstone beforehand
@Master0chan
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheRigby19 phylactery is a common fantasy naming for something that contains (part) of your soul and can be used for resurrection.
@ah2522
4 жыл бұрын
The Turn Undead reasoning is BS. If he can't imagine paladin silencing, why can Druid overload in the current meta then
@remyllebeau77
4 жыл бұрын
Stop complaining about keywords and demand that Blizzard remain consistent instead of renaming keywords.
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
i feel like people really dont get that having more keywords doesnt inherently make everything more clear. trump talks about "keyword bloat", which basically means having so many keywords (many with few cards each) that it can because overwhelming and confusing to remember for players that arent extremely dedicated. they can always hover over the card, but as a game designer, you want to minimize the amount of time players are confused over things they've learned before. it's inefficient game design.
@TheCloudCirrus
4 жыл бұрын
More inefficient than limiting every mechanic to 5 lines of convoluted text? Or more inefficient than having cards that literally don't explain what they do? Magic has a lot of keywords, and it works. Hearthstone has the upperhand, being a digital game and having the option to have keywords explained by just hovering over cards.
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheCloudCirrus im confused why you think that limiting cards to short text is inefficient. it's the exact opposite. quickly being able to grasp the basic idea of a card is core to why hearthstone works so well. zephrys wouldnt be nearly as good of a design flavor wise or gameplay wise if it perfectly explained how it worked in detail. im not how to even respond to your point about magic. it "works"?
@SoftSpott
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheCloudCirrus Magic does this same thing though, so your example is moot. Key words that are set specific are always tied to that set unless its made evergreen. Theres nothing confusing about Dragonbane having "inspire" spelled out, and having it say inspire would actually be more confusing and less flavorful when inspire hasnt been in standard since 2016.
@romeocasido5723
4 жыл бұрын
So hearthstone won't try to redeem themselves from the failed inspire mechanic? It's dead forever? Great concept but it really was way underpowered. Non factor
@cameronsprague101
4 жыл бұрын
It's strong with demon hunter. If they printed modern cards with inspire ladder would be more of a slog. Also murloc knight crushed it in arena.
@TheMasaMume
4 жыл бұрын
Turn Undead: Deal 4 damage to a minion, if it had a deathrattle silence it. This way, it feels better in theme and also limits the silence effect to the "undeath" inside of the minion.
@owenperkins9234
4 жыл бұрын
That's just a better holy smite by an insane amount. Machine gun priest would auto include that in their deck.
@TheMasaMume
4 жыл бұрын
@@owenperkins9234 mayb, but machine gun priest is dead, because its not standard no more and its strong enough to break anything in wild, it would be a strong pick, but then again the easy fix for machine gun priest in wild is just reverting the revert on raza :P
@owenperkins9234
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheMasaMume yeah but the amount of value you get of of this one drop is insane. More damage then holy smite plus you get another one? 8 damage in board control for two Mana seems insane.
@TheMasaMume
4 жыл бұрын
@@owenperkins9234 oh, you fell for a misconception, my suggestion gets rid of the twinspell, also yeah i missed that its a 1 mana card and blanked it as a 2 mana spell
@owenperkins9234
4 жыл бұрын
@@TheMasaMume yeah I guess I assumed it was still there. I think without the twinspell it would be a perfectly fine card for that.
@bereisgreat
4 жыл бұрын
I really disagree on Trump’s criticism of Title Defender. Overkill only procs on your turn, so during the opponent’s turn, they have 5 or more mana to deal with a 5/2 minion with DS, that’s really not that difficult to destroy, as we’ve seen with Goody Two-Shields. It’s only 1+2 damage to take this out. It’s true that you can’t deal with this through stats in tempo alone, but that’s not how HS is played right now. Also, less important is that it’s supposed to be from the Rastakhan expansion (hence the watermark), so the keyword is fine, the double-class is what makes it wrong.
@ishga1407
4 жыл бұрын
Goody Two-Shields is not that difficult to destroy, but it's a really strong card. Change it into "Everytime you cast a spell, gain Divine Shield" makes it op because of the snowball potential, despite still being not that difficult to destroy. Paladin can buff Title Defender just a few times to demand a target removal drawn by your opponent.
@bereisgreat
4 жыл бұрын
@@ishga1407 I think that one costing 3 mana (and sometimes coming down on turn 2) and the other costing 5 mana makes a huge difference. I agree that it's strong though
@GreggDoerOfGaming
4 жыл бұрын
talent recruiter would be busted in wild - machine gun priest would get free card generation and just nuke people down from full to nothing.
@ottosan969
4 жыл бұрын
I don't think they need that considering Spawn of Shadows and Pen Flinger are already doing that job.
@GreggDoerOfGaming
4 жыл бұрын
@@ottosan969 I mean yeah, but those cards both require other cards to get infinite value. That would do it with just itself.
@HighLanderPonyYT
4 жыл бұрын
16:40 99% ripped off of another card. 5/5 design and card of the week... th0nk
@becausecontextmatters5260
4 жыл бұрын
I think the Microknight is intended to work with damaged 1 health minions since paladin also has a Reborn synergy. So this card works in both Salhet's Pride decks and Making Mummies quest decks.
@matd2892
4 жыл бұрын
Keyword bloat is a cop out in a digital card game that when you hover over a card it tells you what the keyword means. Keywords are to save space on cards. Ridiculous.
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
thats not true. if you have a keyword on like 2 cards in standard (such as the 2 inpsire-like cards in hunter right now), many players likely wont see it enough to remember, and they'll have to hover over it multiple times, ultimately wasting time as opposed to just writing it out.
@Orjahlian
4 жыл бұрын
@@lillieofthevlly I really don't get that argument. It implies most players have the memory and/or understanding of an insect, and ignores all the way more complicated concepts such as Zephrys. Hell, with all the changes to Zephrys I'm not even always sure what I'll get without setting up painfully exacting circumstances and I'm a TCG/hearthstone vet.
@matd2892
4 жыл бұрын
@@Orjahlian also see nerf yogg, no word changes. Have to go to an OUTSIDE the game source to find out about nerf. Same when it was buffed. Also see any hero or quest that gives special things. I've had to look up cards while in deck editor because I don't know what certain effect do. And those aren't even hoverable and readable. OUTSIDE the game.
@Evan_Schaefering
4 жыл бұрын
@@Orjahlian I agree with you but Zephrys isn't a good example. It took some people ages to figure out that he only offers cards from the basic and standard sets. The card text was vague enough to cause confusion.
@justinparker7712
4 жыл бұрын
I really don't like Trump's criticism of bringing back old keywords, I really hate that HS abandons old keywords in favor of newer ones. You don't need to evergreen the keywords, but there's no reason why a strong, standalone Inspire minion shouldn't come back, it doesn't mean Inspire has to be meta again (nvm it never was) but you know what I mean. I think old keywords can be maintained in the "filler cards" of each set. You can't just keep coming out dozens of new keywords and never touch old ones in perpetuity unless you want less and less clever and original mechanics.
@neonoir__
4 жыл бұрын
Imagine talent recruiter in modern day raza priest in wild. Yikes
@keivarae26
4 жыл бұрын
Which minion would of been good maybe it would of been bad
@Maddenzie
4 жыл бұрын
first. i had no idea this was a thing. rating user made cards. this is awesome! loved it. 2nd. im conflicted regarding keyword use. the whole point is to save card space and not write the whole thing out. inspire = "after using hero power". i know it would suck to brand new noobies to not know. but isn't there an explanation that defines all keywords when you hover over the card? that should be enough and imo ALL cards should be streamlined to use their keywords and save space.
@AquaLantern
4 жыл бұрын
I just don't get it. WHY do you hate old key words? It's so damn perplexing to me. "This keyword is fun!" *rotates out* "REEEEE, GET IT AWAY FROM ME, AAAAAAGHGHDHAGSGHGDS!!!"
@bireland2012
4 жыл бұрын
The Horcrux Battlecry: Make your Hero gay.
@slim-op8bi
4 жыл бұрын
I actually thought the Rowling comment was a quip about her being horrendously transphobic xD. mby a bit to wake for hearthstone reddit :P.
@GaussianEntity
4 жыл бұрын
Blizzard should make Inspire a mainstay keyword. Change my mind.
@FizzleDrizzleYuh
4 жыл бұрын
Pretty much every inspire card was never played in the expansion it was introduced. It was a dead keyword from day one
@vitordarksider
4 жыл бұрын
@@FizzleDrizzleYuh inspire was way ahead of it's time, nowadays the two best face hunter cards have inspire
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
its not used often enough for that to save players time overall
@GaussianEntity
4 жыл бұрын
@@FizzleDrizzleYuh That's because every Inspire card was intentionally made weak because of the "fear" of snowballing. Oooo so scary. You could buff every Inspire card and they still wouldn't see play (with some exceptions).
@GaussianEntity
4 жыл бұрын
@@lillieofthevlly I kinda want the keyword to force Blizzard to do interesting stuff with it. The way I see the keyword, it's like text that would read "Once per turn (usually), spend 2 mana to do something." It would definitely push away from all this Battlecry obsession this game has had since launch at the very least. Also, I just want to see that little flag animation on a viable card dammit. The closest to a viable Inspire card we got is Spawn of Shadows and Lowly Squire. And those cards aren't even that fun to play.
@henchman1366
4 жыл бұрын
i dont know why is he mad at these Keywords, the Title Defender is in that set with other overkill cards so youre booing them for nothing
@radon_2432
4 жыл бұрын
Trump forgets that hand buff warlock could be thing :D which works well with rusted reimpforcement.
@6GenGamer
4 жыл бұрын
Ehem. Priests should not have access to divine shields? Oh wait, we have dual class cards. Same for freeze in rogue and etc.
@fgregerfeaxcwfeffece
4 жыл бұрын
Just call it Phylactery, it's effectively the same but older then Rowling.
@thewatchwander
4 жыл бұрын
5:25 this would be OP with Raza Shadowreaper anduin. It's a better recruiter
@lepkember6913
4 жыл бұрын
My personal feedback would be to change the "Horcrux's" name to "Phylactery" which is closer to Warcraft lore, and works similarly to a Horcrux.
@godlyvex5543
4 жыл бұрын
crazy, that's exactly what trump says in the video
@lepkember6913
4 жыл бұрын
@@godlyvex5543 oh shit I missed that. Just checked it. My bad lol
@miraclemax6241
4 жыл бұрын
I strongly disagree with Trump's keyword ideology. Keywords exist because they're cleaner than explaining everything on every card. There aren't that many keywords and players aren't stupid. I'm confident we have the space in our heads to understand old keywords- Wild players have no trouble with it. And even if you happen to forget, just hover over the card and see it explained to the side. There's no reason to cycle out keywords in favor of slapping an entire extra sentence on to many cards.
@Mansellto
4 жыл бұрын
Keywords aren't cleaner because a keyword is a mechanic in itself. Even if a keyword did nothing, it is still a mechanic that has design utility. For example, a minion could have the keyword 'Keyword' which does nothing, but another card could say "Give your Keyword minions +10/+10". Separating the keyword from the effect allows more design freedom.
@LeCatization
4 жыл бұрын
When reviewing Dr Frankenfin did trump froget there exists a one drop murloc that has overload? Apart from that typical murloc archetypes in shaman typically include overload cards for board buffs or burn spells.
@hugeheadliang
4 жыл бұрын
I don’t think eating dual-class cards low because it breaks color pie is fair. I mean, check your own preview dual-class card, equality effects was never given to any non-paladin card before
@Rikkis309
4 жыл бұрын
The hating on old keywords is stupid, you can just hover over the card anytime and see what it does if you cant remember them. Imagine if Discover was left to just League of Explorers set, game would be so much different. (Lifesteal and Rush too)
@Hawkster52
4 жыл бұрын
Except he's rating the cards on if they'd actually be printed. Those keywords are never coming back unless Blizzard does some type of wacky throwback set. If you just want cards reviewed regardless of printability then that's not what Trump is doing.
@wz9573
4 жыл бұрын
Bad keywords can stay dead, sure - no one wants to see Joust again. Nothing wrong with the odd Inspire / Reborn / Dormant card here & there though. Wouldn't even mind a couple of Invoke / Magnetic. There aren't anywhere near enough keywords yet for "keyword bloat" to be a thing. Encouraging the designers to not re-use old keywords means they will make new ones every time. Thereby reaching the "bloat" point earlier. Dragonbane is a perfect example of needlessly complex card description. 6 words to say what could be said in just one word. I propose we change River Crocolisk to a "non class specific creature of the beast type that deals 2 damage upon attacking or being attacked & can sustain 3 points of damage before dying".
@Rikkis309
4 жыл бұрын
@@Hawkster52 I didn't mean Trump alone. I dont see why Blizzard themself dont use them. Would make many cards a lot clearer.
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
there's a difference in that all 3 of those keyword see consistent use on cards. having just a few cards in standard with 1 keyword is probably gonna mean a lot of people will need to hover over to read them multiple times, ultimately becoming inefficient for the time of players on average.
@Rikkis309
4 жыл бұрын
@@wz9573 Joust wasn't even a keyword weirdly, but yeah, I'm sure no one misses that mechanic. I agree those other Keywords have a place in game and should be used a lot (reborn instead of deathrattle with sticky minions, many mechs should have magnetic etc.)
@dylancunningham1028
4 жыл бұрын
His comment on turn undead. Doesn’t paladin and warrior share a card give three attack and divine shield?
@eisgnom7383
4 жыл бұрын
On the condition of damaged, which is a warrior mechanic. The devil lies in the details.
@monarkev
4 жыл бұрын
Dylan Cunningham Giving Attack is both Warrior and Paladin. The overlap is damaged/divine shield
@prussia9255
4 жыл бұрын
There's also the card coerce. Combo is much more rogue than silence is priest. Druid, shaman, demon hunter and neutral have silence, only rogue has combo. I'm fine with people disagreeing with Blizzard's card design ideology but A. Trump basically never disagrees with Blizzard which is one thing I dislike about this series B. At least mention the card
@eisgnom7383
4 жыл бұрын
@@prussia9255 again with the damaged condition. I know, it amazes me to, but it is on the card.
@prussia9255
4 жыл бұрын
@@eisgnom7383 you're talking about a different card entirely, I'm talking about the card coerce. And I have no idea what you're saying anyway.
@justadwarfwithgigantism9718
4 жыл бұрын
Instead of naming the "The Horcrux" card "Kel'Thuzads Phylactry", maybe "Gul'dans Soulstone" instead, as it is more fitting of a Warlock (from a WoW perspective). Yeah I know Gul'dan didn't have a soulstone, but perhaps another named warlock, or perhaps just "Soulstone"? Though that might not sound quite legendary enough.
@rhymeswithmoose228
4 жыл бұрын
I think something with phylactery is good, horcruxes came after they were made up and are basically the same thing
@justadwarfwithgigantism9718
4 жыл бұрын
@@rhymeswithmoose228 Aye, but from a WoW perspective phylacteries are more connected with liches and necromancers, where as soulstones are used by warlocks.
@rhymeswithmoose228
4 жыл бұрын
@@justadwarfwithgigantism9718 Fair enough, I really don't know WoW lore
@dozenDevil
4 жыл бұрын
5:30 But that card IS from The Grand Tournament, so it's fine with Inspire as a key word.
@alexlouis3289
4 жыл бұрын
i mean really "horcrux" isnt even unique to j.k. rowling. its basically a phylactery from dnd lmao.
@ksilebo
4 жыл бұрын
A big reason why i hate Yu-Gi-Oh! Card-Game nowerdays is the fact that you need to read a whole Bible of text to understand what the card is doing.
@josephsoh2079
4 жыл бұрын
Yah same that I came over to game where there are keywords
@Benjy52
4 жыл бұрын
I disagree with the Horcrux. 3 cost 0/2 is really powerful, and will work like a pseudo ice block. I also think Soul Separation should be a 3-cost. 2 cost is MUCH too powerful for resurrect priest
@shael4866
3 жыл бұрын
11:26 lol, combo on dual rogue-mage card
@sylphsylph2118
3 жыл бұрын
for tittle defender it could be fixed easilly by removing the divine shield part from the initial minnion ,that way you would have to use something to make it survive the initial assault and make it something basic otherwise
@Phagocytosis
4 жыл бұрын
"Sometimes flavor just cannot handle into gameplay." - Trump, 2020.
@joe-nb4du
4 жыл бұрын
guys i have a question what happen to CUP HEAD SERIES they suddenly stopped I was enjoying Trump playing the game
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
id guess at the very least it continued on twitch so there might be VODs there? probably less entertaining than an edited video though since cuphead has so much failing in it.
@joe-nb4du
4 жыл бұрын
@@lillieofthevlly i guess it could be possible I will go ahead and search his vods ty :3
@monarkev
4 жыл бұрын
Don’t worry, JK Rowling will just tell the HS team to make Anduin gay or something.
@ishga1407
4 жыл бұрын
The light shall burn you!
@PinkFloydBootlegs
4 жыл бұрын
Horcrux: 3 mana 0/4 Warlock weapon. Inspire: Gain 2 durability. when you take lethal damage, you heal equal to this weapon's durability and destroy it.
@weedAndTransRights
4 жыл бұрын
You take damage beyond 0 though
@susiegremlin369
4 жыл бұрын
dr frankenfin seems fine to me, murloc decks typically run several overload cards, ive seen lightning bolts and sludge slurper and lava burst and lightning storm and lightning bloom. i wouldnt say you have to build your deck around it, it just slots into murloc shaman archetype
@FlynnWinch
3 жыл бұрын
i realy like thoses videos, but i'm still not ok with the keyword dilemna, can't we just use them ? good keywords are ok to see again, its not like old keywords would break new ones ...
@pakoRC1
4 жыл бұрын
Notification squad!
@rusPiglets
4 жыл бұрын
17:05 Why reborn would be good here? Soul is a new 1/1 unit, so giving it reborn just makes be reborn as a 1/1. Am I missing something?
@Skitigdread
4 жыл бұрын
The fun part with the horcrux is that you will sometimes get to see the opponent die, come back to life and die again in the same turn :D
@flyingtoastr
4 жыл бұрын
Trump: Can't give Paladins Silence, it's not in their toolkit. Also Trump on the same card: It doesn't matter that Twinspell isn't in the Priest toolkit.
@seaofscissors
4 жыл бұрын
he did bring extra arms literally seconds after though
@prussia9255
4 жыл бұрын
Trump is just so pro-Blizzard, he only allows them to break class identity, which they constantly do. Other classes besides priest have silence. Is it really too far to give one dual class card with silence to paladin when the class it shares the card with is infamous for the silence mechanic?
@Gebirges
4 жыл бұрын
Rusted Reimpforcements is stupid op in Wild Handlock lol You can go Turn 2 into Mountain Giant
@yoseftreitman7226
4 жыл бұрын
*sees Puppetmaster Lazul* Majordomo Executus: "Now's my time to shine"
@elementsgaming2411
4 жыл бұрын
The inspire ones have the grand tournament symbol on them
@lillieofthevlly
4 жыл бұрын
only one of them does
@Skarlon
4 жыл бұрын
You stopped caring about cards being from the set the icon is from, huh?
@samseward1374
4 жыл бұрын
I'm not hearing a good reason why Paladins shouldn't have Silence. Also there are other classes that have access to Silence other than Priest and Demon Hunter.
@unfortunateTimetables
4 жыл бұрын
Yayyyyy so happy to see more custorm card content again :)
@nightphoenixv
4 жыл бұрын
I rarely Dissagree with trump and usually guess what he's gonna say before he reveals it..... and today is no exception. perfect analysis I agree
@ktktktktktktkt
Жыл бұрын
I have no issue with the specificity of Dr. Frankenfin. It's just Murloc overload synergy which already exists and even if it didn't, overload and murloc are both shaman class identities. However, the power level is clearly way too high. You can turn a 1/1 murloc token into a 4/4 charge and it has vanilla stats. This would be OP even in today's game. Also, this should probably be a murloc for design purposes although this makes it even stronger.
@ImaginaryMdA
4 жыл бұрын
Oh, I thought the card would be "Trans women are women".
@water2770
4 жыл бұрын
Yep... can't have all those keywords. Would be confusing to new players as which new player could remember all the keywords in rotation along with keywords whose initial expansion rotated out? Yep we don't need Magnetize, Overkill, or Adapt. Also excuse me new players let me introduce you to our game mode battlegrounds which is really free to play and easy to get into. Featuring all our favorite keyword mechanics such as Magentize, Overkill, and Adapt... More amazingly is that they created new cards with Overkill and one new card Amalgadon with Adapt. I feel like if battlegrounds can use a keyword standard should have free reigns to use it to as confusing new players with the keywords should not apply.
@Xgya2000
4 жыл бұрын
I'd love to salvage the Horcrux myself. Make it cost higher (4?6? 8?) Reads: If your hero would take fatal damage on your opponent's turn, destroy this instead. Deathrattle: Equip another Phylactery at the beginning of your next turn. Now your opponent has to lethal you twice in one turn because the Phylactery keeps bringing you back, which is cool and unique. The opponent's turn clause is so you can still die to fatigue. It does sound weak-ish on paper, but it's still very flavorful. It at least forces your opponent to develop two threats, no matter how small.
Пікірлер: 736