More advanced SMB functionality and support for SMB 2.1/3.0/3.1.1 is available through the rose-storage package available at mikrotik.com/download
@MagneticTaco19
Жыл бұрын
Please make a video describing rose storage. I couldn't get everything working with it.
@andljoy
Жыл бұрын
SMB1 should never ever be used anymore.
@Jerrec
Жыл бұрын
True. SMB1 doesnt make much of a difference at home. Most important is that you dont use SMB1 with Windows XP or below because of Eternalblue. MS has perfectioned to say SMB1 is not trustworthy because of Windows XP. But if you use SMB1 on Windows 10, you dont have much more issues as with SMB3. More problematic are old printers. Anyways, SMB1 on ROS 6 or 7 should be quite ... unproblematic. But the CPU's in routers arent very performant. Thats an issue with SMB 2.1 and 3.0.
@barbariancohen
Жыл бұрын
@@Jerrec SMB1 is deprecated pretty much everywhere; like shown in the video, samba defaults to v2 minimum, and Windows behaves similarly. If you have Windows 10 or never, and don't use SMB1 during the first 15 days after the installation, it will get disabled. The solution is really to use v2 or newer. It won't necesarilly increase CPU usage, the encryption and signing are still optional. But it is a better designed protocol, with no security holes. Promoting SMB1 still is a pretty face-palmish.
@ON3RVH
Жыл бұрын
@@Jerrec SMB1 is ALWAYS INSECURE. The nature of the protocol and lack of encryption makes it so that it is insecure, regardless of OS.
@furmek
Жыл бұрын
Some questions (that will most likely never get an answer from MT) - Does this service listen on all interfaces - including wan? - SMB1 - are you serious?! - SMB is not for large files - why? It does support file transfer resume. SMB is bad on networks with high latency but I don't see a problem moving multi GB files around using that. - How about implementing https (not only http) on SwOS and support for passwords longer than 12chars. Where are you going with those weird features? I don't see people asking for that stuff on your forums... oh wait I forgot... you don't look there.
@RB01-lite
Жыл бұрын
By default SMB is enabled for all ports and you can limit it to specific ones. However the service will not magically jump over a firewall.
@xl7941
Жыл бұрын
But why hAP ax² does not have a USB port😢
@FinlayDaG33k
Жыл бұрын
Some speculation from my side is that it has to do with heat and the form factor of the hAP AX2.
@mauriciolealdesouza
Жыл бұрын
try not to do the commands at the bottom of the screen. Because when watching the video with subtitles, the subtitles are above the command line.
@iounios_italia
Жыл бұрын
SMB 1?? 😰
@RB01-lite
Жыл бұрын
ROS supports v1 and v2.002
@Jerrec
Жыл бұрын
I guess they dont want the CPU Load of SMB 2.1 and newer. Though SMB1 is not an issue at home for most users. Eternalblue is fixed. And Windows perfectioned to say SMB1 is unsafe because of WinXP and Eternalblue. Please keep in mind, that SMB3 may be much more secure, but also much more CPU heavy which those routers cant handle. If you use ROS as full NAS; you do something wrong. For fast file access, it work, though I dont like it either.
@FinlayDaG33k
Жыл бұрын
This is quite nice in combination with RAM disks (if your router has the RAM for it). Allows you to get files (eg config files) from A to B without burning through NAND or requiring a dedicated NAS.
@Jerrec
Жыл бұрын
I want to point out that EVERY usualy Linux Destro disables SMB1 by default. There is no need to flame KDE or Manjaro for it. Grated, Manjaro is crappy, but they did it right here. I understand though, that SMB above 2.0 adds much CPU load you dont want and use old SMB versions. But this also happens with GNOME. And you quite often mixed up KDE with Majaro. KDE Plasma is just a desktop. I use KDE since SUSE 6.0
@barbariancohen
Жыл бұрын
Windows 10 disables SMB1 too, if not used during 15 days since installation. Windows 10 release newer than 1709 disables it by default. Linux distributions with Samba were actually late-comers there ;). The only operating system that still supports SMB1 by default is Mac.
@RB01-lite
Жыл бұрын
Actually Manjaro Plasma inherits some SMB bugs from KDE, that it does not get with other environments, but KDE is still the best one.
@j7ndominica051
Жыл бұрын
Since the smb server was crashing my router in 6.10, I don't want to touch it again even if it probably now works. Even on Windows, I've always had problems connecting to another version of Nework Neighborhood and usually receive a general error "access denied" or similar. I don't need to load the file on the fly into a program, I prefer FTP, which is not as sensitive to latency.
@drumaddict89
Жыл бұрын
why do you still do not support SMBv3.1.1 ? or NFS (without rose package)?
@Supermunch2000
Жыл бұрын
It would be great if Mikrotik routers could mount SMB shares - it would make running TheDude a lot easier.
@FinlayDaG33k
Жыл бұрын
I assume you mean to have the TheDude files on say a NAS instead? If that's the case, I'd rather see NFS support since MT devices run on a customized version of Linux. NFS works a lot better on Linux than SMB does from my experience.
@barbariancohen
Жыл бұрын
They can - via the rose-storage package. Not only SMB, but also NFS, iSCSI and NVMe over TCP.
@LG42LD750
Жыл бұрын
simple and elegant
@davidlandry3487
5 ай бұрын
What is Winbox?
@idoiteveryday
Жыл бұрын
Thank you. Please tell me if it is possible to specify the path to the folder on the MikroTik itself when exporting the configuration from the MikroTik? I have a folder rаm need to save configs in this folder and not in the root of the drive.
@RB01-lite
Жыл бұрын
Create a tmpfs folder and specify it's name as file location, there is a video on that.
@dan__________________
Жыл бұрын
Whats interesting is this works better than it does on Windows...lol
@PrestonBannister
Жыл бұрын
Yeh. You folk make some great network gear, but ... this feature needs a bit more time in the oven. The current SMB3 protocol, Linux, and Samba have some *excellent* support for wire-speed file transfer (even over 10Gbps and faster). You need a new-enough (last few years??) version of Linux. Current Samba is always a good idea (and why not?). Also you want to consider disallowing SMB1 (as we do not want MikroTik featuring in a future CVE).
@jasonserrano8693
Жыл бұрын
is it compatible with windows?
@mikrotik
Жыл бұрын
yes, also with other operating systems
@nick9323
Жыл бұрын
SMB is real nice, but why not through container with all libs required ?! And even then "net appliance" might have at least 16gb of RAM, no !?
@Christos9
Жыл бұрын
A firewall must have a small attack surface, by removing services not adding new ones.
@mikrotik
Жыл бұрын
By default, routerOS blocks all incoming connections. It does not matter how many services you have running
@ON3RVH
Жыл бұрын
@@mikrotik that does not make it secure... it allows everything from the LAN and an attack can happen as easily from the LAN as from the WAN. A router should never run SMB, should never run docker, ...
@D9ID9I
Жыл бұрын
Yes, buy new and shiny ax2 and not be able neither file share neither use usb modem, neither run containers! All hail great hardware decisions!
@k4qdex
Жыл бұрын
smb1? really? we in 2023
@Lann91
Жыл бұрын
lmao this one gotta be a troll
@lickitysplitted
Жыл бұрын
This is a terrible idea. Out of all the method to share and transport files you chose smb and even degraded it to smbv1.
Пікірлер: 40