My point in this video is that the battle rating is still not as I would have hoped, and is a bit of a let down for me. The Stalingrad assault rifle engineer event squads however are a terrible idea for new players, for reasons stated in this video. Join the discussion over on Discord (discord.gg/major) or on Twitch livestreams later today (www.twitch.tv/majormcdonalds)! 💬
@ihatehandleupdate
10 ай бұрын
Call me conservative but I like the old MM system better than any of these. You can choose what maps do you want to play, you can choose which weapons you want to bring and it keeps the game somewhat fresh seeing all sorts of weapons everywhere. Regarding new players, I think it's part of the experience to get smacked a little when starting. You eventually get better, so do your weapons. I fought through 4 campaign's "low tiers" and I never felt like getting matched up against an AR or a better MG is unfair. The thing that matters most in this game is skill. If you play decently, you can carry a match with kar98ks against top tier thompsons for example. My opinion on the update summarised: Tech tree: Gud, Matchmaking: Bad
@Landonistic
10 ай бұрын
I completely agree I like the old system but I can see some benefits for the tech tree
@1NA.trooper
9 ай бұрын
@@LandonisticI agree whit all of you the new enlisted is bulshet
@matejjakopic7797
9 ай бұрын
Ok. Good for you. I agree with starting and getting smacked. But when you play 5 games a day and every time getting matched with ragtag grup of 3+T above you? Whay would enybod enjoy these?
@ihatehandleupdate
9 ай бұрын
@@matejjakopic7797 literally a skill issue
@JoesCornerstadios
9 ай бұрын
They listened to wrong people
@janslavik5284
10 ай бұрын
I'll say the same thing about Stalingrad engineers as I said under Quadro's video: Who actually cares? I'm a Stalingrad pack owner, I wouldn't mind if the ability to equip ARs was taken away just as much as I don't care that we'll receive the event squads. It's only 1 squad of slightly better engineers for each faction without any game-changing ability and there is so much fuss about it. Where was the outrage when there were events for fricking flamethrower weilding paratroopers or Moscow AA trucks, none of which will be obtainable for future players. Hell, F2P players can't even get a single ordinary paratrooper squad. But no, a squad of 5-6 dudes with AVSs and Sturmgewehrs is the problem. This sort of argument should have been made when the first paratrooper event happened, not a year after.
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
And where was outrage against premium squads being able to spawn as Engineers with ARs or Smg or lmgs (like extremely powerful fedorov mg or as-44?) yeah nowhere. So AR engies should be included and the event should be returning every year during Enlisted Anniversary like WT's Maus.
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
Enlisted player's are the biggest cry baby's
@lukekalisz1817
10 ай бұрын
They should have a separate "authentic" mode that only put the weapons/squads on maps they should be. This would allow there to be a balanced mode for people who care less about authenticity and an authentic mode for people (like me) who care about that.
@janslavik5284
10 ай бұрын
Yes, and it would end up just like Lone Fighters and Custom battles, dead in a few months. The point of this merge is to consolidate the playerbase, not divide it even more.
@Pandacorps
10 ай бұрын
So true. This might be a bit controversial, but I actually enjoy playing the battle rating system as it is currently. I liked playing boltaction rifles against stgs when I first started playing the game. In all I thougtht that the current system is much more historically accurate as in reality, you would often face enimys with much better or worse equiptment, and also I love being able to play with bolt action rifles and than quickly switch to a fg 42 in the same battle, it adds much more diversity. Also i hope that they increase the number of squads that you can take into battle from 4 to something like 6 for regular players without a premium account
@pineappledonut5011
10 ай бұрын
I totally agree I enjoy the game as it was I enjoy being able to select that campaign I want to play or play against high tier at low tier because of the reason you stated.
@imperialbill6925
10 ай бұрын
I agree I maybe 12 max slots for each preset and event squads and premium getting there own slots would be amazing.
@Garrus.Vakarian
10 ай бұрын
Agreed, the complainers have ruined this game.
@Pandacorps
10 ай бұрын
Id also like to add that enlisted currently is one of the only games were starter equiptment can oneshot players that have grinded the entire game. It really isnt that unbalanced
@ricardoestevez2466
9 ай бұрын
What about putting tier selection to the old campaingn selection. Early war tier 1to2 tunisia for example. Late war 4to5 normandy
@Scarface-uv6kw
10 ай бұрын
what is with the take that the assault engineers shouldn't be added since they will be attached to a limited time event. By that same logic paratroopers shouldn't have been introduced because they too were tied to events that many people missed and new players wont be able to get. The point of event squads is that they are exclusive and a reward for the players hard work. They wont just give them away for free. And who knows they may add a premium assault engineer squad in the future just like they did with paratroopers. Additionally, they will likely be attached to br's 4 and 5 so its not like new players will be able to use them anytime soon and this would just maintain the high rating automatic weapon spam. In my opinion it really isn't bad at all and I think Darkflow made a good middle ground.
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
All ARs are of tier V so it won't matter at all since you have most op premiums, free weapons like fedorov + as-44 and gold order weapons which goes against those AR engies, i think mate overreacted by a ton with this video.
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
Bad players that can only seal club with there pay to win shit don't want new players having anything but they don't realize with the merge there gonna be fighting other sweats no more seal clubbing time to get gud
@moustache6622
10 ай бұрын
I could be wrong, but I think custom matches are going to increase in popularity after this merge goes through... either that or a lot of people will start playing the game less, assuming they don't end up just quitting the game entirely.
@bestblueRO
9 ай бұрын
I also liked this game a lot. Playing now for 2 years, after this "update " Is awfull. 9/10 matches is just lose. Don't get me wrong I am not the best but either not a noob. Uninstalling and move on. They also not give an answer to my issue from 6 days ago.
@JoesCornerstadios
9 ай бұрын
I uninstalled this week. Its ruined
@Puflong217
10 ай бұрын
I'm sorry I don't understand why the M2 carbine is acceptable for allied engineers but Mkb42 is toxic for Axis engineers. Not to mention the Russian engineers, rifleman, flame troopers, and AT soldiers all have access to ATV 40( think short magazine BAR for the whole squad). Mkb42 good gun but not the best by any means
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
Anti-Axis bias that's all, they think just because Ger has the best tanks it's acceptable for the Axis to not get any good new weapon that could counter Fedorov/AVT-40 (FG42 II is inferior in every way) and M2 Carbine spam, remember the Soviets got AS-44 as the counter to STG44/45 while we got nothing, m2 has no counter besides GO Conders which will disappear forever at some point so not really especially since US can take 3x 9 trooper squads with m2 carbine while you can only have 4 Conders. If you don't like playing tanks as the Germans there are not much point in playing as that nation if others can do everything but much better. New players won't have access to MP717(r) so one less counter to the Soviets.
@jerryjuutalainen1783
10 ай бұрын
As i mentioned multiple times already merge is game killing update. It destroys the ease of adding content in the future, makes the grind even more unbearable, destroys players trust especially the paying ones. Heck a better solution would be to go completely PvE than whatever this is. A BR/Tier system also devalues many premium squads as well and the thing i personally likes about the game way asymmetric battles. If merge goes through in any other way than to simply merge progression or allow for cross campaign progression the game will just turn into an unfun desertion simulator.
@misserjuan9136
10 ай бұрын
Unpopular opinion, but if all they did was change the progression system and left everything else alone, then it would be perfect. I have just as much fun getting mopped by teams as i do mopping teams. Its just a fun game and it will prolly never be perfect. Cheers
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
Same good take
@MartinMartin-bh4ke
9 ай бұрын
You enjoy an early MMO not a modern day open world strategy game this is supposed to be a war game, this just morons running into a spot not caring about losses. fortnite in a WW2 jacket, absolute disgrace like flame stickers on a hatchback to make it go faster
@S3D77
10 ай бұрын
Battle rating is not a good system, just make everything available everywhere and make the determining factor skill, not the gear you have.
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
No thanks i don't want to play every match against chinese cheaters because i have 2.5+ KDR, SBM killed Cod and i don't want another game to be killed by that commie 50% WR invention.
@bbcmotd
10 ай бұрын
This was a stupid test, but we absolutely, definitely need historical map restrictions after the merge
@Apocman
10 ай бұрын
In my opinion, some factions would struggle with the new tech tree and the tier items as most of their more useful equipment like the type 99 and type 93 flamethrower for the Japanese. The mp40,mp38,panzerfaust and the beretta m1 for the Germans .The panzerfuast (again) svt38 and it's sniper version for the soviets. And the 2 versions of the browning and the bazooka for the western allies. The main reason why I said they would struggle is because they are mostly gonna struggle getting this items as they have a chance to get into tier 4 and 5 servers. You could say that they can get into tier 1 and 2 servers but there is a lesser percentage of them getting into this servers as a lot of new players usually are stuck in this tier 1 and 2 servers and making them full. Another possible problem is more experienced players getting into tier 1 and 2 servers by changing equipment from tier 4 and 5 into 1 and 2 .This possible problem could make many newer players leave the game and making it unfun. :( Update: It has been a few days after the update and the problems I stated somewhat happened. Number one, tier 3 equipment players just leave servers that are tier 4 and 5 while they stay in tier 1 and 2 servers ad that is a new problem as they have way better equipment then tier 1 and 2 players and the lower tier players have to sweat so much just to be able to win. Another problem is the insane unbalancing of factions since the USA/UK and the German factions are extremely overpowered than the other 2 factions being the Soviets and Japanese faction. Also tier 4 and 5 is nearly unplayable if its in Normandy allies since you don't have much counter to heavy tanks like tiger 2 and Jagdpanther. This problem in Normandy has cost a massive outrage due to many allied players having nearly 0 counter to this heavy tanks. The only 2 counters seen is paratroopers and bombers. Many players in the community have recommended adding a allied heavy tank like the M26 Pershing tank as it could be a late game tank for the allies. That is all the problems I have seen in the game so yeah bye bye
@_der_Bayer_
10 ай бұрын
I think we should keep the Stalingrad engineers, because the Americans and the Soviets can use full auto weapons on engineers, only the Germans can't use full auto weapons on engineers,(Soviet and American bias) and as a new player you also can't get op stuff like the Gewehr 43 Kurz and it is not pay to win at all, i don't have premium, full access or any premium squad, but i have stalingrad engineers because they are also available for free to play players so my recommendation is either change fg 42 1 and 2 so it start with full auto and has 1 magazine more but engineers can't use assault rifles or remove the ability for Soviet and American engineers to use full auto weapons and engineers can't use assault rifles or only german engineers should be able to use assault rifles ( because they are the only ones who can't use full auto weapons) and don't give 2 OP engineer sqauds to players who bought full acces because that is really pay to win ( stalingrad engineers are not really pay to win) If i say full auto i am talking about weapons that START with full auto because changing fire mode takes you about 2-4 seconds after you spawn with a squad and i said nothing about japanese because they don't have tier 5 stuff
@Taylor59595
10 ай бұрын
thats the biggest oddity to me, everyone's up in arms about stalingrad engineers and yet you can already put automatic "rifles" on everyone in all of the end game campaigns.
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
even setting up FG42 to the auto won't help that it has inferior stats to the AVT-40 and m2 Carbine. People been talking that axis has the best guns but it couldn't be further from the truth. STG44 always been outclassed by the Fedorov and now AS-44, FG42 is worse than AVT-40 and M2 Carbine, all Axis smgs besides MP717(r) are inferior to the Soviet/US counterparts, Kiraly has too much of a recoil compared to PPSh-41 and Drum thompson to be usable unless you have premium Kiraly that can have 2x recoil perks (p2w much?) or Suomi premium that can compete with those guns. I really don't like how they hide those counters behind paywall or gold order weapons like Conders that are still limited to just 4, while Soviets can spam PPPsh-41 drum and US M2 Carbines/Drum Tommies all day.
@tannertaylor9432
10 ай бұрын
The whole engineers with semi autos thing makes no sense to me. You can already give engineers M2 Carbines and FG 42II.
@vevcris9063
10 ай бұрын
About your rant concerning Assaulter-Engineers, that problem can be seen for all event squads and just because of that they shouldn't be added? For example, I started playing Enlisted right after the "Silent Hunters" event ended and didn't get that MP-40 Silenced squad but I would really have liked to have it. What can I say? Though luck. So just because new players won't be able to get them is the reason they should just be removed? This will happen with every event squad and then what is the solution, to never make event squads? Lastly, if you'll play the Engineers with ARs you'll face others with weapons similar in power so it won't affect the gameplay.
@MajorMcDonalds
10 ай бұрын
My point (which I also wrote on screen in words) is that any event squad with some unique/special mechanics should be always obtainable SOMEHOW. What I am referring to here are paratroopers (of which there are only 2 premium squad paratroopers and all others (including some soviet ones coming) are event squads, meaning new players will NEVER get them unless they shell out $80 for just 1 of them for 2 different factions. And then engineers with this new assault rifle mechanic as well, as it's brand-new. If they were always obtainable somehow it would be fine, but they aren't. Silent Hunters squads don't have any unique mechanic really that is actually pretty game-breaking, they are just cool squads, so no there's no NEED for them to come back to the store etc unlike the others. Hopefully that makes sense
@Taylor59595
10 ай бұрын
and yet here we are with event paratroopers every three months, there's no way to get Tunisian paras, and they are very powerful. even if it shouldn't be this way the precedent is already set and until we get gaijin market integration, its not going to change. given the existing precedent I would prefer to keep my engineer squads and not give them up. on top of all of that, having one extra squad with assault rifles is not going to be this major substantial difference that some people seem to think it will be. with out the engineers I can put on two assault squads and toss on premium assault squads, same thing. or I can spawn my assault squads die, and then take two min sized squads kill them on spawn and spawn my assault squads again. you aren't protecting anyone by making them a limited item and they don't add substantial power in the same way the paratroopers do, as paras literally have different game altering mechanics that are only available through them. finally new players unless they buy premium squads will never once not ever see these engineer squads because the use TIER FIVE weapons. so no I reject the concept that it adversely affects new players per all I stated above.@@MajorMcDonalds
@Khrysussy
10 ай бұрын
100% agreed@@Taylor59595
@Samuel_613
10 ай бұрын
It would be nice if the paratroopers would just be the last infantry squad to unlock in the tech tree.
@thedarknessshallprevail9085
10 ай бұрын
paratroopers are trash anyway
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
@@thedarknessshallprevail9085 they are better engineers than the engineers since they can build rallies anywhere on the map
@thedarknessshallprevail9085
10 ай бұрын
@@Dregomz02 you mean those parachutes that show the exact location of where they're going to land so some random tank at the edge of the map can wipe the squad in a single second? What matches are you guys playing?
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
@@thedarknessshallprevail9085the matches where the para troopers cap the point as soon as the match starts and your team can't even get to the point yet
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
@@thedarknessshallprevail9085the matches where the para troopers cap the point as soon as the match starts and your team can't even get to the point yet
@lukekalisz1817
10 ай бұрын
The event system is unnecassarily tedious. I was on track with the moscow atr squad event, just one day before getting the wz.35 (one of three polish weapons in the game) and my internet went down. I really wanted that squad, and would have gladly payed the gold amount had I known I wouldn't have been able to get it for free. But since my internet was down i was unable to even pay for it. Now the event is over and i can't even give them money for it. Honestly I would be fine if they just let you buy the stuff after the event.
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
Welcome to GAAS games, if you miss on few days then you may say good bye to the rewards. WT was the same for the past 10 years so don't expect for them to wait for your crappy internet to go back online.
@imperialwyvern
10 ай бұрын
Regarding the Stalingrad Engineers, the devs should do one if the following: 1. Give Engineers all assault rifle usage. So its not P2W. 2. Give out Assault Rifle engineers event squads twice a year. 3. Add Engineer III's with a upgrade that allows them to use assault rifles. And make them available for everyone.
@maineiacman
10 ай бұрын
That would just enable assaulter spam, which will not be good.
@imperialwyvern
10 ай бұрын
@@maineiacman There already is assaulter spam.
@x-Bandit-x
10 ай бұрын
It's not p2w when it's given for free
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
They will be Tier V anyway due ARs so it doesn't matter if all engies would be able to carry ARs or not.
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
@@maineiacmano but flamethrower spam is fine and paratrooper with one hundred round drum spam is fine 😂😂
@imperialwyvern
10 ай бұрын
Also add map selection to the game. War Thunder has it, and the majority FPS out there. People don't want to play on bad maps or maps they don't like. Myself included.
@AKX-DTGRSMP
10 ай бұрын
A misconception. Pretty sure the "mainly" part is talking about putting tier 1 and 2 in Berlin against other tier 1 and 2. It doesn't make sense for a Italian vehicles in Berlin but they did put the mp3008 at a low tier, a Berlin exclusive weapon.
@MajorMcDonalds
10 ай бұрын
Not from what I have been told. There is currently no way to play tier 1 Berlin or Normandy games, at all, apart from this possible tiny chance to get into one of those games, which will likely be against tier 5 players, because there weren’t enough people queueing or something like that
@AKX-DTGRSMP
10 ай бұрын
@@MajorMcDonalds wait. Then how does one use the mp3008? Or are we putting a desperate weapons in stalingrad? Not that anyone would use it.
@HiraethRestorations
10 ай бұрын
The MP 3008 and other Volksturm weapons fill a unique niche in the game right now. It sucks but it’s the first smg in Berlin, to be replaced as soon as something better(MP 40) is unlocked. To keep that niche, it would need a high BR and low tier. This has the benefit of opening up Berlin maps to new players if they really feel like trying it, even once. It also would give new players a feeling of accomplishment. “Awesome, I already unlocked a Tier 5 weapon. Buy me premium, mommy!” If they do away with that niche use, there’s pretty much no point in having it in the game. Because…. it sucks lol
@x-Bandit-x
10 ай бұрын
Tier 5 vs tier 5 would be the absolute worst end game experience ever
@Spykitty358
10 ай бұрын
I feel like BR rating works when it's tanks. But with Infantry i don't think it's as big of an issue. I personally like the random matchmaking system because you never know what to expect. But there's that new player argument which i also agree with.
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
And planes too you don't want HVAR and 250kg/500kg bomb spam in low-mid tiers. It will be weird not seeing PPSh-41 drum in Moscow i'm fine with vehicles having much higher tiers.
@youthawe123
10 ай бұрын
what gets me is were still restricted (for example) all the MKBs we have are now useless cause we wont be able to use them on moscow or stalingrad maps anymore why would we use them when we can use MP43s or STG 44s? they still need to work out some kinks imo. and the stalingrad enginners thing they need to do the event every 4 months or once a year to make it fair for new players. what there doing with the merge right now is a step in the right direction they just need to work out the kinks
@croma81
10 ай бұрын
Im War Thunder survivor(!) BR system means tier 3 weapon users will be sealclubbed by tier 5 guys in every single match. No exceptions. WT BR means always uptiered. Tier 1-2 user never gonna find matches or wait for 15 mins in queue. To prevent empty lobbies they will add Japan to Tunisia and Germans to Pacific, USA to Moscow etc... just like in the War Thunder. RIP Enlisted...
@SkywarpG1X
10 ай бұрын
So far my my only issues so far. Are the lack of map selection.
@privateryan1944
10 ай бұрын
The biggest mistake since the Stalingrad Campaign imo
@dquod6.096
10 ай бұрын
L opinion
@dquod6.096
10 ай бұрын
@Erick.02 When?
@STRYKER1467
10 ай бұрын
Stalingrad wasnt that bad, it was actually extremely good super fast grind and everything is getting unlocked extremely fast very well invested 20bux.
@dquod6.096
10 ай бұрын
@@STRYKER1467 It’s a scummy marketing tactic I’m happy they took it out but the merge is gonna be dope asf they just have to keep updating it & it will be fine.
@joshjonson2368
10 ай бұрын
@@dquod6.096 you crying them into taking it away just gives ppl less opportunities to grind for stuff, so stop your incessant bitching
@NeilSmith-y3x
10 ай бұрын
I have a mixed line up in all campaigns and always use the lebel squad for example. The whole point of playing is to unlock gear but now that seems less important unless it’s to play new maps that will now be locked out to new players. Every new player as of now has instant access to an assaulter squad with smg so I don’t see why they are focusing on new players with bolts as it’s so quick to level the fist level squads anyway. An experienced player will still stomp a new one with tier one gear as there’s a lot to learn with squad management playing vehicles etc so that still doesn’t solve the new player issue. The only problem with the game right now is unlocking multiple items in different campaigns.
@Boss24601
9 ай бұрын
Honestly i’ve had more success with bolt than any automatic. Its 1 shot and very accurate. Good players can stomp anyone. Sounds like the people complaining are just kinda bad.
@TanksAreCooler
10 ай бұрын
Dude if the engineer event happens and you miss out use Normandy m2 carbine engineer squads to give a similar effect.
@mrfluffsalot8587
10 ай бұрын
Another issue will be map frequency. If the maps are all equally weighted, I don’t know if there will be enough data to do more map reworks or not. The main map I want reworked, if it ever does, is Kahif Cave Village.
@helevu9162
7 ай бұрын
playing with tier 1 equipment against tier 3 is a pain
@sparrowsbewertungen6930
9 ай бұрын
I enjoyed the old system actually... It was challenging sometimes.. but you could manage when you had skill
@mrsenate5269
10 ай бұрын
I think the best bet would be for matchmaking to be based on your rank +/- 1 rank. The map being locked to tiers is fine, they just need to add more maps. Kursk, Battle of the Bulge, Sicily, Burma, Philippines, Khalkhin Gol, and maybe even China and Korea. There’s a lot of options to choose from.
@matejjakopic7797
9 ай бұрын
I would play the game if matching would be like you said. But it is not and I am deleting the gam. It is not fun when you are getting your ass kicked 8/10 matched with groups of veteran players.
@makutarix1769
10 ай бұрын
I still think replacing campaigns with Early and Late Theatres would be better and then keeping it at four factions. This would keep the divide the playerbase PERMANENTLY between 8 rather than 12 (currently) and 4 (new merge). A middle ground that reduces player spread, maintains a degree of historical authenticity, and allows the addition of future content without increasing the player split. It will stay permanently at 4 factions across two eras, so 8 queues (again, it is currently at 12). The four factions are: - Western Allies - Soviet Union - European Axis - Imperial Japan You can add extra nations to within those factions as they are the four main blocs. The theatres are Early (39-43) and Late (44-45). Italy would be split between both. Perhaps Stalingrad might be the same as well as other 1943 locations/events. when you choose a faction, you choose to either matchmake in the Early Theatre Queue or the Late Theatre Queue where you will be matched up against an appropriate faction on an appropriate map. Examples of Early Theatre maps: - Tunisia - El Alamein - Moscow - Guadalcanal - Stalingrad - Italy (1943) Examples of Late Theatre maps: - Berlin - Normandy - Okinawa - Operation Market Garden - Italy (1944) - Battle of the Bulge
@imansgaming
10 ай бұрын
I do hope they open all maps to the tiers like you said.
@rockandgru7719
10 ай бұрын
Good thing that they are listening and trying to find middleground, they could always just ignore and put that update, so, the game is in good hands, they are trying and making test servers, which is pog Also I agree with you
@matejjakopic7797
9 ай бұрын
Listening doesn't mean they actually do it. Matching sucks and I am done hiting 3+T above.
@Taylor59595
10 ай бұрын
no I bought Stalingrad I want to keep what I payed for. making them an event squad is literally the best compromise available. also for map matchmaking, generic locations like Moscow are fine to play with any era of weapons but berlin is too iconic, the maps are too clearly berlin, so no i dont want early war only matches in berlin.
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
Yep i want my AR engies, Moscow is already super generic it should be playable at all BRs, while Berlin and Normandy already are instantly recognizable as historical setting, they should add Leningrad and few other map-campaigns to make map rotation more varied.
@Samuel_613
10 ай бұрын
I'm glad they didn't totally abamdon historical accuracy
@watchmebarelywrite
10 ай бұрын
They need a high tier and low tier for both early war and late war. EXAMPLES: -Equip Kar98K and MP 28, go to Moscow/Stalingrad low tier. Equip Carcano M41 and Beretta M38(20), go to Tunisia low tier. Equip Kar98K Kriegsmodell and MP 3008, go to Berlin/Normandy low tier. -Equip Gewehr 41 and MP 34(o), go to Moscow/Stalingrad mid tier. Equip Armaguerra M39 and Beretta M1, go to Tunisia mid tier. Equip Gewehr 43 and MP 40, go to Berlin/Normandy mid tier. -Equip ZH-29 and Kiraly 39M/MkB 42, go to Moscow/Stalingrad high tier. Equip ZH-29 and Beretta M38(40), go to Tunisia high tier. Equip FG 42 and StG 44, go to Berlin/Normandy high tier.
@danikos18
10 ай бұрын
I personally was very disappointed at first, now I see some hope. Still tho my favorite campaign is Moscow allies and as a player that maxed out the campaign I have the best weapons and stuff. But if this system goes through I will never play Moscow because top level players will only play in Stalingrad and Berlin.
@russellcoight9376
10 ай бұрын
I started playing this game like 3 days ago and had 0 problems killing sweats using the level 1 weapons. Definitely a skill issue. The only problem is not getting anti tank off the bat.
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
Good man every body just wants everything handed to them now
@russellcoight9376
10 ай бұрын
Skill issues@@spencersecrest6001
@youtubeuser9090
10 ай бұрын
Why don’t they just keep the system they have right now? It seems a lot better than all of the proposed ideas
@MajorMcDonalds
10 ай бұрын
For many reasons, but mostly it's to simplify queues. If they keep adding campaigns as they work right now (which I assume is what they would do), the playerbase would keep being split further and some campaigns would be empty whilst others popular. So by "merging" into factions, it simplifies the queues, and people can play on any "theatre of war" including ones they may add in the future without adding more queues
@TimberWolfeVids
10 ай бұрын
I would prefer a blend of old vs. proposed new. I’m currently focusing on Western Allies in the Pacific. Once l max level the theatre, I’ll most likely move over to Normandy. Now here’s the part where I like the tech tree system. 90% of what I unlocked in the Pacific…now I have to unlock the same weapons AGAIN. Maybe go with the new idea of tying everything to faction somewhat as proposed, and mix that with McDonald brought up…campaigns based on tier level. The main issue with the current system is a “T5” player is in the same game as a “T1” player…plus the multi-map grind. IMO the latest proposal doesn’t actually fix this…just a dirty, nasty band-aid with questionable adhesive.
@isaacrhodes4617
10 ай бұрын
I'm gonna miss campaigns tbh
@DomagojSkiljan
10 ай бұрын
I agree with a simple tier vs tier, also I think every couple of months we shuld have an event like the pacific one where everybody played a premade team - fair for new and old players to grind squads and decoration
@DomagojSkiljan
10 ай бұрын
By team I mean squad composition
@tannenberg5972
4 ай бұрын
The BR system broke the game for me. Actually, the entire update as a whole. BR, weapon research, campaign merge, it's all a big pile of dogshit, but especially the BR. I unironically haven't played this game since then. Which is a shame because I really, really loved it when it released. Can't count the hours I spent defending Moscow. Was on the verge of *finally* unlocking the PPSh-41, then boom. Now I'm stuck on Berlin if I wanna play with the good stuff. Fight King Tigers in a BT-7, no thanks. You can't use historical 41 equipment in 41, you get uptiered to 45. For once I was gonna be on top (I'm usually not very good in shooter games) and dominate Moscow with PPSh-41, DP-27 etc. Honestly the biggest let-down and overall disappointment I've ever experienced personally in gaming. Shame to see such a good game be ruined. Fuck you, Gaijin
@paradoxofperfection8965
10 ай бұрын
I feel like if they did a tech tree system for each campaign and when you unlocked a weapon in one campaign you'd get either to unlock it in another campaign or have your progress boosted significantly in the other campaigns with that weapon rather than merging all the campaigns and having all this unique equipment and units without their original homes. It's almost impossible to retain the quasi-authenticity Enlisted had with a merge, the separate campaigns were a selling point for me and I feel like if we introduced a battle rating and tier system to the campaigns individually and found some way to merge progress in campaigns that shared weapons and equipment, it would be better for the game.
@maineiacman
10 ай бұрын
I do not want to see Tiger 2s in Moscow and Stalingrad, same with ISes. Also your idea to bring back event squads every year is terrible idea. One way to balance powerful squads is by making them rare, so the battlefield is not full of them. Paratrooper squads being premium or event only is a good way to keep them from dropping into every objective in the game. Hopefully Enlisted will get a player to player way to sell rare event squads to each other like WT.
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
Paratroopers already drop into every objective because of Pay to win cucks your just scared of other players being on a even footing so you can't seal club now you'll get matched with other sweats 🎉
@tomislavvranjkovic9210
10 ай бұрын
My idea is playing tier 3 (German), oh the suspense
@genjack8632
9 ай бұрын
The best system:room system. Open up a room or join a room of your choice. Ranks and player profile will be publicly displayed for everyone's information. Use room name to specify a niche playstyle(bolties or specific tier), the tier thing can stay, but just as a reference. BR system unbalanced? Balance it YOURSELF!
@smallebige
10 ай бұрын
I think the tier three system is pretty dumb tbh Like make tier threes fight tier threes and not 4 and 5s you’re just asking for trouble
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
They gotta let seal clubbing happen 😢
@poggingmilk9452
10 ай бұрын
Me after the update with my one gold order weapon in Moscow:
@NapoleonTotal
10 ай бұрын
OK major, I agree with you with most of the stuff. I just slightly disagree with you on the premiums. Yes the events squads (some of them are op), but that doesn't mean enlisted should hand them out. Or in other words how is enlisted going to reward people who play daily, or older players? Overall I just think these event squads should just be special, but NOT overpowered. Ie, enlisted should give us para squads, but also give it to player players with an event, and limit them to only two, which they seem to be doing. Overall the events squads as of right now are not broken (except for the Vickers and Fg 42 paras). They just need to make sure more event squads are given out, and they are balanced.
@RainmakerLTU
7 ай бұрын
Good Lord what stopped them from configuring MM to BR I to play explicitly against BR I, BR II against BR II only and so on. After that dividing, MM should calculate and divide players by ranks into Sergeants, Lieutenants - Captains, Majors and Colonels - Generals. By this point there probably will be not enough hooman (lol) players to fill 10 slots for each team, so that are bots for. And this dividing of players should be most fair, because with more or less equipment, players can compete only with their skill. And nobody will cry: "How can I fight with starting rifle, against enemy with next in line upgraded rifle". That is for basic, available for all researcheable equipment. For Premium weapons and all other equipment, if player in team A brought to battle Premium piece of equipment, for team B MM should pick other player (or bot if player can't be found) with the same or similar by type (weapon-weapon, tank-tank, not weapon-tank or tank-plane etc.).
@justpur33xposur35
10 ай бұрын
I might get some backlash for this but looking at the Russian tech tree, I’d like to see the avs 36 be at rather tier 3 or 4, or have it be a still be a tier 5 gun but the Russian guns that existed in all periods of the war like the avs, ppsh ppds and dp and dt be cross tier meaning they can be on any tier but what would determine if they go to Berlin or not is if they have the IS tanks in their rotations.
@justpur33xposur35
10 ай бұрын
But then have other tier 4 or 5 weapons like the mg34 and beretta 40 round be in all 3 periods of the war. The Americans tier 5 guns like the Thompson be in all tiers, etc. basically any top tier weapon that existed in all periods of the war become universal, but tier 5 weapons like both the fg42’ that I’ve only been in Normandy and Berlin stay in those 2 campaigns. But the mg34 can be in all campaigns and the 42 be in every except for Moscow.
@dmdj8588
10 ай бұрын
Bro AVS-36, AVT-40 retired before the start of the eastern front.
@justpur33xposur35
10 ай бұрын
@@dmdj8588 the avs was I guess yeah but the avt 40 was first fielded not until late 1943
@dmdj8588
10 ай бұрын
@@justpur33xposur35 all of AVTs were converted to SVT40 config before summer of 1941
@justpur33xposur35
10 ай бұрын
@@dmdj8588 just looked it up. Avt 40’s we’re ordered in may 20th of 1942. Reached the troops by July of 1942
@donnym3415
10 ай бұрын
I don't find this game unbalanced or "pay to win", just curb stomping and seal clubbing are extremely bad. I can get top leader board with bolts against STGs or Tommy squads/BARs/Johnson rifles/Etc more often than not. But I can get annihilated too, but it's like 70 good/30 bad for me. This may just be my experience, but yeah Love the video though
@jordangreenwade2931
10 ай бұрын
I don't understand why not say keep the campaign system add the tech tree and not allow certain equipment to go to certain campaign like the Stg to Moscow etc. I just don't see a point for the br changes plus you keep your squads in the various campaigns and just equip them and arm them as you pls.
@mrsanatra1
9 ай бұрын
If i cannot choose between pacific and normandy, this game is done for me. I dont care about the other stuff, i just enjoy those 2 and dont want to be FORCED to play something else. Same with game modes, best one is invasion. Domination is garbage and (forgot the name of the mode) planting the bomb is trash if your team got off the short yellow bus which 9/10 times they have.
@MartinMartin-bh4ke
9 ай бұрын
You are forced to play a game mode, forced in shit or too OP teams, enticed with shitty XP boosts that you lose when you desert cause the match is pretty much over before it started
@mrsanatra1
8 ай бұрын
@@MartinMartin-bh4ke I uninstalled the game. The merger did EXACTLY what I didn't want. Ive been stuck in Berlin hell for about a week with my team being off the short yellow bus and the other team STACKED with Marshalls and gold ranks. Smh whoever thought this merger would be good in their company should be fired. Now the game is random modes, random maps with random players usually losing for 30-45 min.
@MartinMartin-bh4ke
8 ай бұрын
@@mrsanatra1 I criticized the game in game and got a chat ban 🤣 i dont know wtf they are doing but it is baaaaaaad
@mrsanatra1
8 ай бұрын
@@MartinMartin-bh4ke Their social media people are terrible, any negative comment gets your comment removed or you banned. Lame and shows how weak the people involved are bro. I liked the game before the merger, but it sucks now
@gonkhoasteau2691
10 ай бұрын
i dont think your idea is the Best Matchmaking solutions, I will play Tier 3 all the time to have more fun
@dquod6.096
10 ай бұрын
There will still be a lot of maps idk what your talking about each campaign has at least 2 or 3 maps & they are most likely going to keep adding battles such as France, Kursk, etc
@retiredbritphilippines4722
10 ай бұрын
I’m new, so Tier 2 items are 2 star weapons, Tier 2 troops and tier 2 vehicles ? And where does it show your Battle Ratting ?
@prettyokandy230
10 ай бұрын
I still don't understand removing Stalingrad engineers' ability. It would only matter for higher battle ratings anyway and this way you still get the problem that in the future new players don't have access to it...
@multifister47
10 ай бұрын
New player, still learning. For clarification, you’re saying that if I equip a single 3-star smle rifle on one of my dudes, then I will be gambling with either the bottom of the barrel new players, or dudes that have months of play time?
@funniestduck
5 ай бұрын
I can’t believe that this is the reason all my tier 3 things suck, why don’t they just make tier 3 players go up against tier 3 players? I’m sick of my m4a2 not being able to penetrate the king tiger thats sitting in the out of bounds area on Normandy
@mihaisirbu1
9 ай бұрын
This update is CANCEROUS, i used to play with G43 engineers, kar snipers and i only had 2 op weapons on assault squad: stg 1942 prototype and cödners. Sometimes i clubbed noobs but usually i was paired with enemies on my level. Ever since this update im ALWAYS in tier 4-5 and getting DESTROYED by 1000+ hr vets that insta kill me 3 seconds after i spawn, sometimes i feel like there are a ton of aimbot hackers. I resorted to camping and guerilla tactics to get BARELY 1kdr when i used to get 4+ consistently
@Sirvalian
2 ай бұрын
I really miss that game, tried it again and the merge just ruined it for me, not even close to what it was anymore. Hopefully someone will create something similar in the future.
@lorak95
10 ай бұрын
BAD IDEA the new system. I think exacly the same as you do at min 7:00. Le everyone play at anycampaig with any tier, just make a matchmaking with players, not maps.
@lancerking1600
10 ай бұрын
the players with automatics are the T800 from terminator
@diegoballesteros2924
10 ай бұрын
Are they going to remove the jagpanther? It is not on the German tree
@anothergermanmain
9 ай бұрын
BfV may not have accuracy, but it has the BEST customization I have ever seen. You can make absolute God soldiers in there. It's awesome.
@anothergermanmain
9 ай бұрын
You have access to all the drip you could imagine to unlock in that game.
@HX1997_
10 ай бұрын
I will never be able to accept those assault engineers. And Japan only has a ridiculous type hei lmg to match an assault rifle. And instead of making those assault engineer squads an event squad darkflow should make them unlockable by completing few achievements. So that people don't have to fear of being left out.
@n_nils3056
10 ай бұрын
Me who just unlocked a Tier 4 weapon in Moscow but mostly got Tier 2/3 weapons: *Chuckles* I'm in danger
@torbjrnsteinsland8985
10 ай бұрын
Sounds like a new event is coming, and I have a lot of time. 😈
@torinjones3221
10 ай бұрын
Honestly I bought the Stalingrad pack for the flamingo not the Assault Engineers. I didn't even realise they had the ability to equip assault rifles until like a year later when it was announced during those merge updates lmao.
@Obamos04
10 ай бұрын
I already regret starting to play enlisted just now...........
@JimNulTis
10 ай бұрын
Yeah im not fond of the whole maps based on weapons. It'll just become extra work the devs have to worry about every time they add new weapons or update existing ones. And honestly i was expecting the battle rating thing is gonna be like war thunder (i.e. tier 1 v t1 and 2, tier 2 v t1, 2 and 3, t3 v T2, 3 and T4 etc.) But no. T3 becomes a gamble
@HerrFresh
10 ай бұрын
I was just about to unlock the Panther G too :( . Screw this update.
@anothergermanmain
9 ай бұрын
Despite equal chances for maps being good, each individual weapon should still be considered when matchmaking. I can garuntee that almost nobody wants to see StG and AS44 spammers running around in Moscow. We need to just be given a set of maps for each tier (that would make sense based on our gear, so basically kar98 homies could end up anywhere, which is great) and then based on your mP choice, TRY to match you with people on those maps. You're a kar98 guy who likes Normandy? Put this guy with tier 1 allied mains. You're an avs enjoyer who'd rather be in stalingrad? Bet. Because, the sovs and Germans get a large map spread at EVERY tier, so they would work fine. Then, the low tier Americans can also fit in in all three campaigns. So as far as low tier goes, this would work. As you get into high tier map choices could be tad bit slim, but it would still work, protecting balance AND historical accuracy while also giving map choice
@Jayw251
10 ай бұрын
I don't care about tech trees. I want to play against and with competent players and see what evolves out of that. Yesterday I met a guy who plays like me. We won 14 games in a row. We just ran em over.
@Mordu83
10 ай бұрын
I hope they add a feature so uniforms can be pre setup so that I can use the same squad on different maps and the camo auto switches to suit that map. So am not running snow camo in the desert
@Bigbacon
8 ай бұрын
most players would never be able to achieve the goals to get free squads like that anyway. Its the same as most other free2play games, free stuff is really only for the people who sit there and play 8 hours of day. the only outlier here is Mechwarrior Online.
@_dimitri_1242
10 ай бұрын
They do this so that KZitemrs can make content on their game and I'm all up for it
@samuelelliot6156
10 ай бұрын
7:00 Japan don’t got full auto rifles 😢
@maineiacman
10 ай бұрын
Keep the campaign system, with cross campaign unlocks using a common currency and nation based xp
@TimTaine
10 ай бұрын
We do 100% need matchmaking, but I don't understand why it's tiered. Why not just assign every item an individual battle score and balance everyone's total/average battle score. Adds variety and flexibility, but cuts the spam. You could even make it exponential - your first tier 4 item for example contributes 10 points to battle score, second is 15, third is 20 and so on. Then balance matches based on score. To some people extent I don't really care so much about which campaign weapons turn up personally - I'd rather just have more variety of maps in rotation and balanced teams.
@spencersecrest6001
10 ай бұрын
Why do we need matchmaking go play on a leap pad or get gud
@milchbrot0608
10 ай бұрын
I think the map should be based on the faction you play like it is now. If you play Japan you get pacific maps and if you play he germany you get German and Soviet maps
@Mordu83
10 ай бұрын
Higher tier squads could have longer respawns times,
@dovagin544
10 ай бұрын
IMO they should merge weaker tier three weapons into tier two, and stronger into tier 4, then just make it one and two, four and five
@Taylor59595
10 ай бұрын
it only looks bad for now, when they add more mid war campaigns then tier three will get fleshed out more and we will probably get more tiers. ie berlin will become 5-6 and then mid war will be more like 3-4 etc. but thats not obvious to most people yet since they havent added any more new locations or campaigns this year.
@genjack8632
9 ай бұрын
major being not based for the first time. entirely not true. go play a few round of t2 t1 soviets and then you will realize the system is doomed. While the system in theory will make the matches fairer PROVIDED there are enough player so that uptiers / downtiers don't happen so often, this is enitrely not true AT LEAST for the soviets. You consistently face a wave of mp40s, impact grenade spams, and freaking Pz IVs 😅 and no matter how hard you try you simply can't win when 5 out of 10 teammates are bots, 3 out of 10 teammates are just ....hopelessly brain dead(no offense, only about their skills in Enlisted), and the rest 2 of your teammates are finally competent enough and are trying hard with you together. And the germans? You will see 5 of them will be competent players, 3 of them are gold ranks , and the rest 2 of them will have that insane 2 year login name deco. 😂 I am sorry, but the merge is not working for me. I know it might be working for others, but not for ME. Also, It's ridiculous how abundant smgs and downtiered t3 mp40s are when playing soviets t2, and it honestly makes bolt actions, my favorite weapons not viable. Play low tier they say, enjoy bolties they say, I can't believe I fell for this ridiculously laughable claim before the merge😅 So no, the merge is not working for me, no, absolutely not.
@christophermckenzie7064
10 ай бұрын
Major will the pacific engineers be the same as Stalingrad because i bought the pacific pack before they removed it??
@Capta1n_thunderYT
10 ай бұрын
We need more campaigns like Sicily,west Germany,and Poland
@Dregomz02
10 ай бұрын
Italy with Greece maps would be cool for cool vistas, Poland early war vs both low BR Axis and Soviets, early France war with Brits against the Germans and Ardennes/Hurtgen forest maps, plus Leningrad, Kharkiv and Kursk.
@Capta1n_thunderYT
10 ай бұрын
@@Dregomz02 I forgot about Greece
@knightfox429
2 ай бұрын
Has this system been changed since I am a new player and am wondering whether or not to follow this advice
@Krow9000
8 ай бұрын
This game is absolutely unplayable for new players. All the veterans Generals with their Fully upgraded gear enter Battle Rating 1 fights ALL DAY with their BR3's and WRECK new players into the ground in a matter of minutes. An absolutely AWFUL experience
@MajorMcDonalds
8 ай бұрын
It is not “absolutely unplayable” - veterans with tier 3 gear entering tier 1 is not a problem at all, because the increase in power from doing so is exceptionally minimal and you can’t notice it at all. I can EASILY shred BR 3 guys with BR 1 equipment. And then there’s the trade-off of them ending up in tier 5 games half the time by playing tier 3. The only partial exception to this rule are tanks - I can see how tanks are a bit of a struggle tier 1 vs tier 3, but it’s a combined arms game - use a plane or a soldier to blow it up, or flank it to pen the side or back
@sparrowsbewertungen6930
9 ай бұрын
Tech trees is anice thing.. but.. i still want my historical battles
@dj_deroni-o5222
10 ай бұрын
for me i just want only one thing different. and thats gunplay honestly after several hours of playing enlisted for me its major bullshit when there is a assault rifle or even LMG with no recoil and you can use it like a fucking SMG pushing buildings with little to no effort but yea thats just my opinion.
@COVID--ls6xf
2 ай бұрын
1:17 as an avid warthunder player i firmly disagree
@carelesscribo3072
4 ай бұрын
I play tier 3 but i leave the tier 5 games, dont care if thats a wussy way of doing things fix the matchmaking and id be more prone to stay.
@sonje2121
9 ай бұрын
"Assault Rifle for Stalingrad Engineer only is P2W" I have better question. Why the hell Engineers can't use Assault Rifles? Even Mortar man could use assault weapons in Normandy Test anyway.
@MajorMcDonalds
9 ай бұрын
It’s because it would make assaulters, and even medics, useless. Engineers are just better versions of these, and if they can equip the same weapon, then there’s no reason to use the others in favour of engineers
@sonje2121
9 ай бұрын
@MajorMcDonalds I get the point, but I don't think it would make them useless. The point is: US Engineer can also use M2 Carbine which has high RPM and damage, just like StG44. Actually, every US rifleman can arm with those automatic rifles. And soviets also can arm with AVS-36 anyway. It also has high RPM and higher dmg compared to assault weapons. Germans can also arm with FG42(changing fire type is pain in ass thou). Every single normal riflemans can just use regular automatic rifles instead. Even engineers can. 9 riflemans with AVS-36/M2 Carbine is fine but engineers with StGs are Op? It seems not right, doesnt it? I'm not saying giving SMGs to engineers. Just Assualt rifles. SMG has advantages compared to StGs. Higher RPM, and ammo capacity. Every match when i played as German at Stalingrad, i preferred german captured PPshs instead of MkBs. I don't think giving StGs makes assault useless. SMGs are still powerful. And it makes them as poweful breacher Thank you for the reply btw.
@p50tek
10 ай бұрын
Not T2 and T5 will be best to play as top of their tier. It will bo only T5, becouse T1-2 games will aslo have players with T3, so T2 will not be top tier in that matchmaking. I dont know why they dont want to make just normal battle rating matchmaking like in warthunder, and separted queue for more historing setting gamplay on maps.
@onewayroad3765
10 ай бұрын
I have already unlocked tiger2. After the merge do I have to unlock it again like I'm back to zero?
Пікірлер: 264