This was a hell of a video to research, went digging in a lot of places - but am glad to have got all this info consolidated into one place - hope you enjoy it! Feel free to join our Discord community! - discord.gg/WCevgcufwJ Consider supporting us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/AviationDeepDive
@AndreJourdan
Жыл бұрын
J'ai connu le dernier pilote du Late631c'etais Un voisin et je recherche son fils.jlou.Andre.
@jeffreymcdonald8267
Жыл бұрын
Well done. Thank you.
@markbowles2382
Жыл бұрын
Wow, never heard of this one - but give the brave fr ench credit - it was a very bold time in engineering where bigger meant better - also they had to double down on capacity after already conceiving their design - politics killed many great airplanes of that time, not just in France.
@ethanboyd7843
Жыл бұрын
Downloaded it for pc and mobile just for this channel.
@ethanboyd7843
Жыл бұрын
What was the helicopteroid commercial craft that got in a vortex state and rolled over atop a manhattan building killing ppl on the ground and ending commercial helo service in the city to this day? I wanna say it was like a hybrid vtol to airfoil thing. Weird name. Would be a great topic for a vid! I'll support that.
@psymons9133
Жыл бұрын
Sad about the copy right issue... But a MOST interesting and well researched topic. Enjoyed it very much.
@ShamanKish
Жыл бұрын
Adam and Eve were kicked out of Eden for copyright breach.
@ronaldvrooman9695
Жыл бұрын
@@ShamanKishThey knew too much.
@vanCaldenborgh
3 күн бұрын
@@ShamanKish Yeah, Eve got sewed by Apple.
@ShamanKish
3 күн бұрын
@@vanCaldenborgh 😆🤗
@ceejay960
Жыл бұрын
As a fan of big flying boats, particularly the Boeing 314, I'm surprised that I've never heard of this plane. It was truly beautiful! If I were a billionaire I would build a modernized replica of it. Good job on the video and thank you for telling the story of such a rare bird.
@southlondon63
Жыл бұрын
Check out the mighty Sunderland derived from the Empire flying boat, more designed for Coastal Command actions but used well after that .
@thhomasmarks
Жыл бұрын
I live 43 minutes from McMinnville oregon and am going to see H Hughes' massive wooden Hercules or Spruce Goose coined by its critics. It cost a whopping $350,000 000 in today's dollars.
@redblack8414
14 күн бұрын
@ceejay960 Typically American. Totally ignorant of what is going on in the rest of the world.
@alainfournol6786
Жыл бұрын
Congratulations for the big research work ! this plane is special to me since my grandfather worked at Latecoere on the building and then maintenance of the 631, and he sometimes talked to me about it (by the way I knew nothing of the Boeing 314, just the opposite to most people here). It is a big pity that it lacked anti-ice boots, this is not understandable (even my own plane built 1974 has several). I learned a lot about that beloved plane thanks to your work. I had still pictures from my grandpa, but it is the first time I see videos of her. Little detail : the newspaper in the video is from from the victory of 1918, not the defeat of 1940, but I prefer it like that ;-) Big Thanks to you, continue the good work !
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the comment, why - that's incredible that your grandfather worked on the 631!
@JosephDawson1986
Жыл бұрын
I saw this and had to comment. In the 1930s my great grandfather was a maintainer for the docks , as well as the aircaraft, for the Boing 314. They made stops in Maine for fuel and to load American passengers.
@alainfournol6786
Жыл бұрын
@@JosephDawson1986 Hi Joseph, our grandDads (or great grands) were lucky to work on such pieces of history ...
@davidgapp1457
Жыл бұрын
An important video. This is an outstanding presentation which keeps alive the memory of a remarkable, if under-developed and under-tested aircraft. Many thanks for the time and effort poured into making this documentary. Very much appreciated.
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@loiclaronche5675
Жыл бұрын
At last ! A video on this forgotten but beautiful aircraft. Thanks a lot
@bigantplowright5711
Жыл бұрын
That is a new one on me! Everyday a school day. Excellent.
@quentintin1
Жыл бұрын
the biggest issue that led to the 631 poor reputation was certainly the circumstances that surrounded the prototypes N°1 had a short testing phase before the germans squirreled it away N°2 never was properly tested and was used a the first production plane in the context of a reindustrialising France, the testing phase was shortened to it's bare minimum, leading to host of issues to remain undiscovered until it hit the users (an issue shared by many state-run programs in the 50's)
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Yes good points, I think the nature of the early development really handicapped the aircraft.
@freddiecunningham2860
Жыл бұрын
Why ppl don't survive plane crashes?
@duglandp
Жыл бұрын
@@freddiecunningham2860 High speed against solid objects has never been a good idea for human beings
@mesalab3781
Жыл бұрын
@@duglandpIn the words of a wise man ''Its not the speed that kills people, suddenly becoming stationary, thats what gets you.''
@duglandp
Жыл бұрын
@@mesalab3781 Fair enough
@ThreenaddiesRexMegistus
Жыл бұрын
Victim of being a pioneer. Beautiful looking plane though. Great video!👍🏻
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thankyou!
@Travis_22
Жыл бұрын
The fact they didn't have any de-icing or anti-icing systems on their aircraft makes me shudder. RIP to the lost.
@AwesomeAngryBiker
Жыл бұрын
Was icing even considered back then 🤔?
@pcka12
Жыл бұрын
@@AwesomeAngryBikerWW2 bombers had it
@kyleb3754
Жыл бұрын
Or Wi-Fi !!
@steffenrosmus9177
Жыл бұрын
@@kyleb3754who needs that ? Those planes flew so low that you could watch the landscape to kill the time.
@steffenrosmus9177
Жыл бұрын
@@pcka12also some types of fighter planes.
@xvdd1
Жыл бұрын
It is interesting that the 631 overlapped the Sanders Roe SR 45 which never went into service because the demand for flying boats had waned due to more airports being built for land based aircraft so putting the 631's safety record aside it would have been redundant anyway just like the SR 45.
@anareel4562
Жыл бұрын
It's really cool that the Mars is still used today as forest fire fighting equipment
@walterrudich2175
Жыл бұрын
They are no more in service
@rescue270
Жыл бұрын
Both surviving Mars were withdrawn from service and put up for sale some years ago. Hawaii Mars was flown to AirVenture Oshkosh a few years ago and put on water pickup and drop demonstrations, probably in an effort to attract buyers. I believe they now both been donated to museums. Almost certainly they will never fly again.
@anareel4562
Жыл бұрын
@@walterrudich2175 I thought they still had 2 out in BC
@peterwright4647
Жыл бұрын
@@anareel4562one is for sale now on trade a plane. Waiting on my lotto numbers Lol
@walterrudich2175
Жыл бұрын
@@anareel4562 but they put them out of service in 2015 or so
@Paladin1873
Жыл бұрын
This makes two plane in a row I've never heard of. Great work.
@davidholmgren659
Жыл бұрын
A beautiful aircraft of which I knew very little about. Great presentation... Thank you very much.
@justinrovers1
Жыл бұрын
I was expecting REXS hanger, the art looks sooo similar. He’s a little more in-depth but this is a good video as well
@UncleManuel
Жыл бұрын
Out of all the flying boats this is definitely the most elegant... 😎😎👍👍
@MrTerrymiff
Жыл бұрын
It is a pity that there is no film of take-offs or landings showing the deployment of the wing floats.
@raywest3834
Жыл бұрын
The most beautiful flying boat I've ever seen. Sounds like the specs change may have had something to do with the later problems. A tragic story, well-told. New subscriber.
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@thomasbaker6563
Жыл бұрын
A Sunderland looks better
@deejannemeiurffnicht1791
27 күн бұрын
I can't believe I've never heard of this plane before. Well done putting this one together there!
@raydesmond6712
Жыл бұрын
Wow, I realised you have the correct markings for the crashing aircraft at 13:54 F-BDRD . Kudos! Nice attention to detail
@collin6238
Жыл бұрын
I'm an aviation enthusiast but I never knew about this beautiful bird thank you for the video
@mikejankowski6321
Жыл бұрын
Your final thought was going to be my comment - that at least one should have been preserved in a museum. All such rare items deserve to be so memorialized.
@old_guard2431
3 күн бұрын
So, weather. Early in my Coast Guard career I was on a High Endurance Cutter (think lightly-armed frigate) doing Ocean Stations, also called Weather Patrols. We had three a bit over 1/3 of the way across the North Atlantic and the Europeans ran three on their side. We ran a navigation beacon, chased weather balloons twice a day to keep them on radar as long as possible, did oceanographic work. And were there. One mid-Atlantic passenger seaplane ditched successfully near a Coast Guard Cutter. (Bermuda Sky Queen, 1947, Ocean Station Charlie) The program was surplus to requirements by the time I was involved (1970-72) - the civilian airliners had better navigation equipment than we did, and the aircraft doing transatlantic flights were much more reliable than in the early days. It was discontinued in 1974, and a lot of our ragtag fleet of Navy-surplus WW2 seaplane/PT boat tenders, destroyer escorts and the like got a much-deserved retirement. (My ship was built in the 1960s and still soldiers on in the Philippine Coast Guard.)
@MarceloBorba-t5m
Жыл бұрын
High quality video. Thank you.
@CFtablet
11 ай бұрын
The Brazilian diplomat and composer/singer Vinicius de Moraes ("The Girl From Ipanema") was in this flight between Rio de Janeiro and Montevideo that had an emergency.
@illuminem
Жыл бұрын
The newspaper headline shown at 6:10 did not announce the defeat of France in 1940, as narrated, but the defeat of Germany at the end of WW1 in 1918. Other than that, very interesting information on French aircraft technology in the 1940s.
@alainfournol6786
Жыл бұрын
exactly, you are right and I was about to write about that ! however it is more heart warming to read that than the newspaper of june 40... keep it unmodified 😁
@overbank56
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this great video. I've loved flying boats for a very long time. I wish these giants of the sea were still flying
@ArmySigs
Жыл бұрын
Yes, imagine taking one of those old flying boat trips across the atlantic in that sort of luxury - what an event! Of course not in any of the ones that crashed :)
@ethanboyd7843
Жыл бұрын
Fantastic work man.
@backho12
Жыл бұрын
A very well done video! Thank you so much
@timsarchery
Жыл бұрын
I hate how KZitem puts copy right down it destroys hard working people like yourself I'll like and subscribe just for that to but I really like your videos very informative and interesting and always well researched great work
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thankyou!
@NebulaM57
Жыл бұрын
Wow, this was great! I'd never heard of this aircraft. Well done sir!
@stockseer
11 ай бұрын
Very well done presentation; I'm a bit of an aviation buff (we were neighbors with Olive Ann Beach and the Wallaces who ran Cessna in the 1950's; and Rutledge who ran Boeing Wichita) and I never knew this story of the French flying boat. Incredible that one has not been preserved for posterity. I appreciate your work on this.
@daigriffiths399
Жыл бұрын
The GR-2600-A2A engine was also used in the Boeing Model 314 'Clipper' and was a known oil guzzler at anything up to 7 US quarts per hour. The aircraft may have looked pretty but its design left a lot to be desired. The loss of a prop from overspeed suggests that the aircraft was not fitted with prop feathering; Hamilton Standard developed prop feathering for the B-314 so it was available and proven technology. So were de-icing boots; Goodrich made them for the B-314 (Boeing made a big fuss about the 'world's biggest deicing boots' in advertising) so they could have been made for the 631. The big barrel-shaped thing between the two pilots is a ship's gyropilot ('ship' as in big metal thing that floats) . The Sperry A-1 gyropilot designed specifically for aircraft had been available since about 1920 and the A-2 was available from about 1932. Both the A-2 and A-3 (1937) gyropilots were fitted in the B-314. So why didn't the Latécoère 631 use deicing boots and an aircraft-specific gyropilot? I'm going to guess "it's American - we're got to use something that's French". Lastly, the B-314 carried almost twice the payload (75 passengers) for around two-thirds of the 631's range on two less engines (2700 miles). It also weighed in at 2.5 tons less than the 631 (41.5 tons gross). The French had the B-314 (and the British Short Brothers C-class 'Empires') as a starting point but (it appears) chose to ignore obvious safety features when designing the Latécoère 631. The iced-up Latécoère 631 inflight shots are from MSFS? Thank you for a well-researched and informative video. I thought I had it bad when researching the B-314 but compared to the Latécoère 631 I had mounds of information.
@davidjones332
Жыл бұрын
The most likely reason for the lack of any de-icing gear (apart from the fact that it was a very new idea) was that flying boats in general tended to operate at quite low altitudes (typically around 5000 feet), and these boats were intended to operate in Equitorial latitudes. It was probably thought that the risk of icing was very small and did not justify the extra weight of the kit.
@harrymattah418
Жыл бұрын
Idiot if diplomatic. Racist if not.
@jeandelacroix6726
Жыл бұрын
Much guessing, and a lot of missing. The big pylons between the pilots isn't the autopilot (they had a Alkan autopilot based on the SAMM autopilot made for previous bombers). The big thing in the middle is the navigator's compass (whcih also acts as pilot's backup compass) with some shared wing compensation commands for pilots. France hs autopilots since the 30s with Jeagers and lkn types available. Why would they not want a Sperry gyropilot when they used Wright engines and not Lioré engines (used early on the prototype) that had the same average power output. The Alkan autopilot was probably more adapted or more easily adaptable given they could easily call the engineers . (Example, same happened during the procurement process of sniper rifles in the 80s. British Accuracy Int and Verney Carron were both shortlisted but as they could repeatedly tale the Verney guy to the range to test the proto and tell him what they wanted modified (and go for beers after each session) while the Accuracy Int guys were not willing to move much) The Ratier props had auto feathering, however they had resonance problem with the engines that vibrated too much. I ackowledge that the almost inexistant deicing system was quite the problem.
@daigriffiths399
11 ай бұрын
@@jeandelacroix6726 I'm a bit late but thank you for the follow up and the additional information.
@JasonMcCord-qk3yb
Жыл бұрын
I never even knew this aircraft existed! So beautiful, it was, and now has gone the way of the PBM Mariner. (Though at least there exists one non-flying example of the Mariner in a museum.)
@guaporeturns9472
Жыл бұрын
Love the big , multi-engined prop planes… the more engines the better
@Dilley_G45
Жыл бұрын
Do X - 12 engines
@guaporeturns9472
Жыл бұрын
@@Dilley_G45 absolutely. Love it
@American_Jeeper
Жыл бұрын
Well-researched, well-outlined and very well-presented. Also, excellent French pronunciation. Liked and subscribed!
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@brendonrutherford5118
Жыл бұрын
Yip your "French" pronounciations were not merely good but were beauitful even though I don't speak French myself!! Lovely language but still making my mind up on the people themselves!! (ugh)
@markbradley2367
Жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Thank you for producing this. I've always been fascinated by flying boats ,particularly this one as it looked very elegant. Sadly, the old saying that if it looked right then it flew right clearly didn't working this case !
@jeanbonnefoy1377
Жыл бұрын
6:25 strangely enough, this picture of a SE200 dates from 59-60 judging by the Renault 4cv and Dauphine clearly visible parked under the left wing. Anyway, kudos for this video, the Laté 631 being one of my all time favourite planes, certainly one of the most beautiful ever, even with a fate on a par with the sadly infamous British "Empire of the Clouds" R101 airship. Btw, kudos for your excellent pronunciation of French names (at the one and only exception of Amphitrite to be pronunced /AmphitrEEt/ ): it is such a rare feat with English spoken videos. But being a Greek, I guess you certainly know something about languages. As said from a retired translator and interpreter.🤗
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info, and appreciate the kind words - means a lot! Should have known to say Amphirite like that… ah well, next time! 😁
@TheYumChannel
Жыл бұрын
Been waiting for a video in this aircraft
@callenclarke371
Жыл бұрын
Excellent content about a fascinating (and dangerous) aircraft. Well done.
@JStryker7
Жыл бұрын
Damn the wings coming off is brutal
@terry351
Жыл бұрын
What an amazing history, thanks for putting all this effort tomake it!
@simonf8902
Жыл бұрын
Excellent French pronunciation. ❤and a very nice voice too.
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thankyou!
@burntsider8457
Жыл бұрын
An interesting story well told,
@ronjon7942
11 ай бұрын
Starting a lecture with a Martin M130 is so AWESOME! Those were some clips I’ve not seen before.
@goldgeologist5320
Жыл бұрын
This reminds me of the Howard Hughes Spruce Goose. But in metal. You should compare size.
@Firebrand55
Жыл бұрын
Never heard of it.....but I have now, thanks to this excellent vid.....well researched and narrated, an absorbing insight int, for me, the Aircraft That Never Was. i can't agree that it was 'beautiful; the nose reminded me of Jimmy 'Schnozzola' Durante!...11/10.
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! It appears the looks are a bit more divisive than I thought!
@alainfournol6786
Жыл бұрын
the nose reminds me my Beech Baron 58 so I love it !
@kenhufford8425
Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much!
@TheRumbles13
4 күн бұрын
Liked and subbed. Thank you for all your hard work.
Жыл бұрын
Fine documentary
@jasonworden8209
11 ай бұрын
That is one of the coolest planes I've ever seen. I love the nose!!
@Anabsurdsuggestion
16 күн бұрын
Great video. Well done, fascinating story.
@propman3523
Жыл бұрын
Great job!
@williamr3840
Жыл бұрын
Yet the faults leading to each crash were different in each case. It's not as if the design had a common flaw that reoccured in all the planes. I think the faults may have been down to wrong assembly, inadequate maintenance -- or even wrong maintenance. A number flew for years before any problems. One crash was due to ice build up, which is nothing to do with its design, but more to do with it not being a required specification (or even something fitted to this kind of plane at the time).
@ronaldbayne1431
10 ай бұрын
Fascinating. Good video and excellent narrative. Thanks Rmb
@johncillis3431
Жыл бұрын
This was an interesting aircraft I did not know much about until it was added to Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 as an add-on for sale. Your video adds to my knowledge of an aircraft that might have been in wider use were it not for WWII, then it was made obsolete by the DC6 and Lockheed Constellation. I have flown across the Atlantic 16 times as an air passenger, the Pacific twice and the Caribbean four times, always thinking of these old aircraft as I flew in jet aircraft and their contribution to aviation. Like the Hindenburg, there were tragedies, but civilian aviation has become so much safer over time I think of these tragedies in context and those like you who create videos teach about that context which I avoided during 500,000 miles of business travel and 100,000 miles of personal travel. I found more danger on the ground, as they say, although when I learned to fly in '06 I realized the importance of the pilot in an in-flight emergency, I have been in ground aircraft emergencies and one low fuel in flight emergency because of fog, but I felt calm, knowing I was in the hands of fate, and knowing fate can sometimes keep us calm in a vehicle emergency.
@CRUZER1800
Жыл бұрын
Very interesting story... Just goes to show the high cost of advancing aircraft technology in the earlier days. Thank you for posting... Russ
@ashifabedin
Жыл бұрын
Sad about the copy right issue... Enjoyed it very much.
@robertclark972
Жыл бұрын
Thought it was odd -- picture of a huge marine plane and the words Deep Dive Aviation ! !
@pattywolford
Жыл бұрын
New subscribed. Thanks.
@hilman94
Жыл бұрын
just found out about this beautiful sea plane because of so many reviews of microsoft flight-sim on youtube. thanks for reviewing it... 👍
@karlfriedrich7758
11 ай бұрын
Great video! You definitely did a lot of research and it's cool learning about a lesser-known plane like this. Keep up the great videos!
@aviationdeepdive
11 ай бұрын
Appreciate that, thankyou!
@christopherreed4723
Жыл бұрын
The immediate post-WW2 period of commercial passenger flight was dangerous as hell. Loss-of-life accidents happened all the time. As far as I can tell there are several reasons for this uptick. First is that the number of aircraft operating as passenger airliners increased dramatically. In the US, especially, all the C-47 and C-46 transports that had been flown by the Army Air Corps were sold to civilian airlines. The large number of returning servicemen who had experienced air travel - before the war a luxury for the very rich - drove an explosion in new routes. Trains were passé, airliners were what you traveled in. None of these new airliners had pressurized cabins. During the war, pilots and crew could use oxygen masks to reach higher altitudes, but fir commercial passenger flight that wasn't practical. So all these new airliners were operating at below 12000 feet, to prevent their passengers from passing out or dying from hypoxia. That put them in an altitude band that is extremely hazardous, because it's also where a lot of bad weather happens. You also have to contend with terrain, which is bad enough on landing or takeoff, but claimed a lot of aircraft during cruising in this time, since even minor miscalculations could result in flying into a cloud filled with rocks. Air traffic control was in it's infancy. Continuous radar tracking and transponders as we know them now were unknown. Aircraft flew in established corridors and reported by radio when they passed radio beacons. This caused a lot of accidents due to navigational errors, but also several spectacularly fatal mid-air collisions as the limited airspace in the transit corridors became increasingly congested. And, finally, there was a widespread lack of safety features. Devices such as leading-edge and control surface de-icers were considered luxuries, not the absolute essential they are today. Navigation was by map and compass, dead reckoning, and landmarks on the ground. Instrument landing systems didn't exist, and crew fatigue was an unrecognized danger. And the Latecoere was flying *very* long distances under these conditions. Aircraft losses were only a matter of time.
@CrusaderSports250
Жыл бұрын
With the huge rise in demand there would also be a need to get the passengers on your plane, pricing the seats competivly to do so, and when things get cut to the bone maintenence always suffers, another reason for the high accident rates.
@alainfournol6786
Жыл бұрын
this is a good summary of the situation at that time ! Anyway it is incredible that they did not have any de-icing boots on the leading edge, since if it is 0°C at sea level in winter, your are finished if you cross several clouds between 0 and FL120.
@chrisreynolds6520
Жыл бұрын
Even the US military had multiple B29 and B36 losses during the same time.
@calderniven8110
Жыл бұрын
Good stuff, well researched, well presented, well edited. Liked and subbed, looking forward to more!
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thankyou!
@gerardleahy6946
Жыл бұрын
It is indeed sad to think that no example survives but it suffered the same fate as the Boeing 314, i.e none still exists. There is a full sized replica of the fuselage of one at a museum in Foynes, Ireland
@buckwheatINtheCity
11 ай бұрын
In spite of the tragic losses, the French deserve credit for building these aircraft.
@jiyushugi1085
13 күн бұрын
Fascinating airplane, never even knew of it. Thanks for the upload. Did the pilots imagine that flying into icing conditions and thunderstorms would not be dangerous on such large aircraft? Get-there-itis? Arrogance? Hard to fathom.
@rogerb5615
11 ай бұрын
The flight deck is larger than my living room. Sheesh!
@306champion
Жыл бұрын
She was a beautiful bird. I am sure there must be photos of the interior!
@brentsummers7377
4 ай бұрын
Superb in flight clips!😀
@cricticalthinking
Жыл бұрын
Just discovered your channel. It has great potential. The amount of information you provide hits about the right note. Would you consider doing some more modern aircraft as well. I know Aircraft like Concorde, SR71, Airbus A380 have been done many times but your style lends itself to adding another facet to those stories. A bit like different singers covering the same song. All have their merit. The Concorde is unmatched in so many ways not just raw speed but what had to be invented to do that. How many planes even today do you know of can fly you at Mach two in the clothes you are wearing. If anything planes have largely stagnated except in areas of fuel economy and noise levels. If Concorde was a 'quiet' aircraft it would still be flying.
@adotintheshark4848
Жыл бұрын
It went down in history as one of the most beautiful designs, and it also just went down.
@laura-ann.0726
Жыл бұрын
I've never heard of this flying boat. The Martin JRM Mars is far more familiar to North American aviation buffs, having had an amazingly long post-WWII service life as a water-bomber in Canadian service, fighting forest fires all over the Western US and Canada. Two JRM airframes are still extant in 2023, both as museum aircraft, I think.
@Taketimeout3
15 күн бұрын
It is one of the most beautiful and awe inspiring planes of all time. It deserved to succeed. The late 30s is the most interesting period in aviation. So many beautiful aircraft like the DH Albatross, one if your next vides, hopefully.
@kristoffermangila
2 ай бұрын
Of the three French aircraft manufacturers (Potez, Lioré et Olivier, and Latécoère) which build those big flying boats, only Latécoère is still in existence; although nowadays, it is engaged in the manufacture of aerospace components rather than whole aircraft. It builds the passenger doors of the B787, for example.
@TheLateBird7
Жыл бұрын
A well rounded video, very enjoying watch. The reenacted part of the iced-wing crash was ... well, chilling. (Pun not intended!) Great french voice acting here. Also the development context is very interesting. I'd not heard of the SE.200 Amphitrite before. I must say, aesthetically that one is even more attractive to me!
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Thanks! I also have to admit the SE.200 is a bit more cool looking.
@vanessabryan786
Жыл бұрын
The Amphorite was the aircraft that transported Film stars to the first post war Cannes film festival. The Lat. was an incredibly elegant flying boat. The Flight deck was huge like an item from a Jules Vern story.
@sreed8570
10 күн бұрын
In the history of aviation especially the first 50 years, designers and builders were simply making the best airplanes they could considering the materials, processes and techniques that were available to them at the time. When you think about it, its still amazing what they achieved back then. Remember these men were just a few short decades removed from the Wright bro's.
@simonrancourt7834
11 ай бұрын
A few years ago, one was found at the bottom of a lake in Québec.
@gavmansworkshop5624
Жыл бұрын
I bet that plane had shocking blind spot issues too.
@kikufutaba524
Ай бұрын
I love flying boats, what an amazing time for aviation.
@johncurcio3621
14 сағат бұрын
Well done and interesting.
@frenchie7812
Жыл бұрын
WOW this is a huge work!! Nice job, I have learned a lot here. Thx
@aviationdeepdive
Жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@kevindolin4315
11 ай бұрын
The French certainly had a predilection for massive flying boats: the biplane Breguet 521 Bizerte, span 115'; Breguet 730, span 132'; Latécoère 302, span 144'; Latécoère 521-523, span 161'; Latécoère 611, span 133'; Potez-C.A.M.S.141, span 134'; Sud-Est LeO H-246.1, span 104'; Sud-Est LeO H-470, span 104'. As a long-time fan of all things that could float 'n' fly, I was fascinated by this video. How I would have loved to have flown in one of the great flying boats of the time, well, not this one. Many thanks for the work you did on this little known craft. Perhaps you could do one on the Loire 130, perhaps the most widely used French wartime flying boat.
@danielprates2208
Жыл бұрын
There is a MSFS latecoere now. Looks good
@deltavee2
Жыл бұрын
I'm sure it is just a rumour that the nose was designed by Charles de Gaulle.
@jamesbugbee9026
Жыл бұрын
Giant flying boats?- i'm there ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@Theintruder100
Жыл бұрын
Very interesting. I never knew about this aircraft until now.
@kennedysingh3916
Жыл бұрын
Watched from Old Harbour Jamaica.
@goldgeologist5320
Жыл бұрын
Great video!
@kiwisteve6598
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for a quality video. A very pretty aircraft. While it should not have shed a prop, and had significant flaws, I think the airframe deserves a hat tip for staying in the air having lost 2 engines on the same side and a large hole in the fuselage (and one engine twisted badly off centre so would have generated heaps of drag). On that occasion it brought everyone (except the 2 initial fatalities) home, so must have had some good flying qualities too.
@tommytwotacos8106
6 ай бұрын
Freaking amazing that they were able to get the aluminum that they needed to complete the project during 1942. That's probably half a dozen bf-109 fuselages represented in the wing spar alone there.
@danhubert-hx4ss
Жыл бұрын
Most interesting. Didn`t know abt. this masterpiece.
@rafarosso8518
Ай бұрын
the many accidents are extremly sad yet the Latécoère 631 is stille my favourite flying boat (and its not only bc im french i promise)
@oxcart4172
14 күн бұрын
Thanks
@DavidJohnson-gh3si
11 ай бұрын
Excellent video, thank you!
@UnrealEntity
11 ай бұрын
I didn't understand why it read "deadly" in the title, I guessed it would have been a war machine, turns out my imagination was struck by reality hahaha... it was not untill the end of the video that It became clear why it was so deadly. Informative sad story for such a nice behemoth. Now a days there are airplanes that are way bigger and due to all the technological and engineering advances and are way safer as well, so the Latécoère 631 is like a sort of aviational titanic. The story is the same, nowadays there are ginormous cruise-liners better and bigger then the titanic. Your research efforts are appreciated. I had a youtube channel in the past where I was more in to comments then anything else, I know what it takes to research to answer questions or to refute false information flying around the comment section, I had like more then 100 comments to reply to every day on a hole range of diverse topics, had to take something like 9 hours to reply to them all working hard to investigate before answering... turns out that I was not getting payed for such huge efforts... exept for the knowledge that I acquired in the process, I abandoned it for not being profitable, for being exhausting and for it being kind of dangerous as well because of some religious fanatics that would lie about stuff and be angry if someone pulled off their mask with some research and factual information. So I understand how much effort and time it takes to do something like this, specially to provide factual information.
@repenney
8 күн бұрын
Pretty and deadly; so true for many things.
@Topofdescent55
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for an awesome video! This was a new aircraft to me when it released for Microsoft Flight Sim a couple of months ago, it's an absolute beauty in the sim ans incredible value at 10-15 bucks. This video adds to the fascination, l appreciate the depth of research you did!!!
@aviationdeepdive
11 ай бұрын
Thankyou, that’s very kind! I agree, it’s really awesome to see such an aircraft come to MSFS
@survivaloptions4999
Жыл бұрын
The nose of the SE 200 looks like the ancestor of Boeing's 700 series and modern jetliners in general.
@handy335
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for an excellent informative video! Very well done.
Пікірлер: 568