God bless you Understood 3 hours worth of class in a 17 minute video
@Randomly.cliche
4 жыл бұрын
bro thats nothing ... he just saved me from my exams, chem is my weak spot.
@goldenkill3298
Жыл бұрын
This is my Chem teacher lol
@secrethandlehuhu
8 жыл бұрын
you smart. you loyal. i appreciate that.
@wolvesbane1748
7 жыл бұрын
Freedom that's an acreiate statement ....another one...another one ....another
@wolvesbane1748
7 жыл бұрын
one
@syedasalwa2391
8 жыл бұрын
Your the best chemistry teacher ever! And I hate chemistry but the way you explain makes it all so easier and simplerYour a genius, thanks for uploading this!!
@saytorz
8 жыл бұрын
oooooh my. Im up all night preparing for my chem finals. While in class i just didnt understand the concept. And you worked different types of questions. It was clear. You're a life saver. Thank you. ^_^
@JJ-Chantel
8 жыл бұрын
You will never know the magnitude of how much this video helped me. Thank you so much
@kiraivanich1264
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!! I was on the verge of tears before I watched this.
@waodaaaaa
5 жыл бұрын
literally saved my chemistry grade, god bless you !!!!
@Randomly.cliche
4 жыл бұрын
i love how u include sarcastic comments and make this kind of fun then how boring and sleepy others do
@justinchaney7445
8 жыл бұрын
thank you so much, I have a 100 point assignment due tomorrow and have been searching the internet for so long. you saved my life.
@josephd8404
8 жыл бұрын
thank you, seriously. i finally solved a hw problem i've been stuck on for hours simply by watching 10 minutes of this video.
@GinoTheSinner
8 жыл бұрын
Thank you for clarifying the molarity bit. Of the ~100 videos I've watched this is the first one that specifically mentions that only M's should be in the ICE table.
@kgaogeloakaaka7393
2 жыл бұрын
Wow... You actually explained this better in 17 minutes and that's what my teacher couldn't do in 2 weeks.. 😂
@amitbanerjee1325
6 жыл бұрын
Searching for how to solve these for 1 week finally got it..god bless you
@Anna-zy6hk
3 жыл бұрын
i watched so many videos and didn’t get how to do it until this one! thank u sm!
@DM77333
5 жыл бұрын
Honestly, this is such a fun explanation for what I thought would be a super boring topic so thank you!
@bokulahmmed756
3 жыл бұрын
First conditions was so much helpful from me.. Best wishes for you from Bangladesh
@hielenaug
7 жыл бұрын
YOU! are the best!! thanks a lot! why can't I ever get a great teacher like you? I understood everything so clear!
@jagritbudhiraja6391
8 жыл бұрын
thank you i wish i had a teacher like you
@SupaChinido
10 жыл бұрын
Best video on web for someone like me who know absolutely nothing about how to solve equilibrium :D
@laurasalvaggio113
8 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much this is the only video I've watched on this subject that actually explained it thoroughly.
@emmanuelkalunga7916
Жыл бұрын
Well explained and you are just a good teacher
@luvzlife1
11 жыл бұрын
If someone told me i would understand ICE BOX i would tell them they are crazy! Thanks you Mr.Seigel!
@Wolfeywolf16
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I was really dreading the quadratics equation and you just elminated so much of my anxiety
@jaidmubanga5328
11 ай бұрын
Thank you for this wonderful explanation 🎉❤
@preidbass
8 жыл бұрын
best explanation of this I've found...cheers bro!
@meganysc5246
6 жыл бұрын
thank you so much!!! I finally understand what my teacher was trying to teach for a week:")
@shamri4436
9 жыл бұрын
thanks for the help! got at 67 on my test!! my parents love me again!!!!!!!
@ethanlawrence5502
3 жыл бұрын
Thankyou for this video. It really helped me. You might just have saved me.
@WAZZA1235
10 жыл бұрын
Thanks for saving my exam.
@sentoiben
6 жыл бұрын
Bro! Best 17:40 of my KZitem binge ever!
@michellengu3946
9 жыл бұрын
good explanation man! better than my current teacher >
@riak401
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you soooooo much!!! You helped me wayyy more than my teacher :))))
@wallacet4789
8 жыл бұрын
Appreciate that, very clear explanation and it helped me very much ! Hope i can answer the question for exam tomorrow!
@francieemanzano2034
8 жыл бұрын
Very useful information and he's very good at explaining it. Thank you.
@YoungFudge3
7 жыл бұрын
youn the mannn i understood everything in this 17 minute video
@gangsterkami1
9 жыл бұрын
Fantastic method. However I prefer to think of out logically and use ratios to work this out. I kind of wish I knew this method in the first place, I suppose thinking of it logically is the superior way as it shows your understanding of equilibria.
@adityasaxena7374
7 жыл бұрын
Very well explained keep uploading more videos
@abby4899
9 жыл бұрын
Thanks a gazzilion yo! :) I adore peeps that teach using examples!
@JarsOfRedClay
9 жыл бұрын
As my friend would say...bloody fantastic!
@lenzfaraday2077
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!! I missed the class on ICE so had to keep up
@24OakRaiders
11 жыл бұрын
Amazing!!!! More power to you. I love your teaching mechanism. Thank you.
@Stelnice
8 жыл бұрын
isn't Kp=Kc(RT)^change in n (where R is 0.0821 L.atm, T is temp in kelvin, and change in n is mol of gas products-mol gas reactants) ?
@blankblank8176
3 жыл бұрын
YES
@Rodger16
5 ай бұрын
Very good video to learn
@donodestro4179
8 жыл бұрын
i love you...you made me understand the ICE table...thanks
@kayla7772
8 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making this video, Mr. Seigel!
@Dev3z
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro love from India
@favourizuagba231
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir. This video was helpful
@aprilharris8933
8 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much your students are so lucky.
@pastorpretty4121
2 жыл бұрын
Does reactants always go down if for reverse reaction????
@aidanbailey6337
8 жыл бұрын
Brilliant (taking Gen Chem 2: college).
@CoolVideoWatchpersn
10 жыл бұрын
bloody fantastic thank you so much for doing this video! fantastic explaination
@majan374
8 жыл бұрын
Why would you use square brackets on the Kp expression when they mean moldm^-3?
@WAZZA1235
10 жыл бұрын
I got something quite odd when redoing the question at 14:30 myself, with another technic. What I did was when we were at the 64 = [HI]2 / [H2] * [I2]. I simply placed the 2 réactants (the 0.2 * 0.2) on the side of 64. So I have 64 * 0.2 * 0.2 = [HI]2. So i square root the result of 64 * 0.2 * 0.2 and get the answer 1.6. How come the equilibrium for 2HI, when calculated (as I just did), is equal to 1.6 rather than the 0 that is expected?
@harikeshkaul5584
9 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation. Thank you.
@ankithrao7215
9 жыл бұрын
Great explanation, but just one question: is Kc the same as Keq?
@nerdyblackgirl_x
3 жыл бұрын
do you have a video that goes deeper into the ratio thing?
@San-pu1gn
7 жыл бұрын
jst awsummm👍👍
@jumuahalabsbek731
6 жыл бұрын
Well executed
@beautyprincess6454
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very veryyyyy muchhhhhhh you help me alot
@kevingunawan3913
Жыл бұрын
isnt the 6:55 2H2O suppose to be 0.1 m at initial, why is it at 1.0?
@jaidmubanga5328
11 ай бұрын
He might hv made a mistake
@muskaanseher4144
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, you are a great teacher☺☺
@surat8591
3 жыл бұрын
Awesome!!Thank you so much!!!
@saimakhankhan2517
7 жыл бұрын
How can u calculate Kp when you are given moles. plz someone tell me a link or something.
@westsideconnection1258
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks you’re a great teacher!
@Kayla-ns7lm
7 жыл бұрын
Thankyou, I found this really helpful :) really appreciate it
@rhussain3180
8 жыл бұрын
Thank you! You will help me get through chem eng! :D
@jamiecoleman773
8 жыл бұрын
Do you do it the same same if your two starting moles of H2 O2 were different? say instead of them both being .200M, H2 = .033 and O2= .0081 what would you do?
@justinchaney7445
8 жыл бұрын
+Jamie Coleman The reactants (which I assume you meant H2 and I2, not that it matters) would have to change by the same amount so they still would change by "-x". 2HI would still increase by "2x". Therefore you would plug in these new values instead of .2. From there you would simplify the "64=" equation until you reached 60x2−2.6304x+0.017107=0. After that plug in the quadratic formula(If you don't know what that is go to this site here www.purplemath.com/modules/quadform.htm ). That should give you your answer for x. You will get two answers (.0359 and .0079) and it must be .0079 because .035 is greater than your H2 value. then just apply this to your ICE table giving you an HI value of .158. That is as far as my understanding is of this topic.
@saladmona
9 жыл бұрын
so for question #2, 0.16 is the answer and it ends there?
@mongalo92
8 жыл бұрын
You're a life saver!!!!!!
@TheIsotopes
5 жыл бұрын
For the last problem why was it (2x)^2 ???
@peterkabwe9648
Жыл бұрын
This is awesome
@BunnyEthan
12 жыл бұрын
how do you get the 8x in the 1.6-8x=2x?
@lindeeslife6513
8 жыл бұрын
At 10.01 , is the unit for Kc M^-1 or M? Since you didn't include the unit when you calculated the final answer which was 0.16 >< thanks!
@justinchaney7445
8 жыл бұрын
+Shalinda Beevi M
@carefull8365
5 жыл бұрын
Is this for as level?
@m3h3d1997
8 жыл бұрын
thank you so much i highly appreciate that
@143BabyDoll143
8 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't HI be 2(times) 0.32 making it 0.64
@justinchaney7445
8 жыл бұрын
+143BabyDoll143 Probably a little late to tell you, but know because when he multiplied .16 by 2 that was due to HI having a constant of 2.
@iEpicness2k10
8 жыл бұрын
This helped me so much! Thanks!!!!!
@calseed
7 жыл бұрын
where did u get 0.38 from tho ?
@mickaylamihailovic4613
8 жыл бұрын
Lifesaver!! Thank you soooo much :)
@sunjidaakhter2090
7 жыл бұрын
sir i've a problem in this chapter and i want to send u a question so i'll be pleased if u help me..
@thashen1690
9 жыл бұрын
great video, thanks
@Jessiey404
7 жыл бұрын
What about a limiting reagent?? How does that work it's way into the equilibrium???
@marcseigel5949
7 жыл бұрын
LRs don't get involved in Equilibrium because the reaction never goes to completion.
@olwakhemngqolo3750
8 жыл бұрын
thank you
@adityasaxena7374
7 жыл бұрын
Please Add Questions Of Degree Of Dissociation.
@carlosadams5478
6 жыл бұрын
i do wanna say this but you are awesome
@Jenny-mi3zq
7 жыл бұрын
Made me laugh a lot 😂 thanks 👍
@shudidesai
8 жыл бұрын
You da real OG
@TuyisengeJonas-id9sw
2 ай бұрын
I can't find where the -o.38 was got from
@daretoawesome
2 ай бұрын
Since they tell you what the equilibrium concentration is you can subtract to find the change.
@yeabsirayeshane3002
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@romies2999
10 жыл бұрын
Your the best thanks
@AbsurdoMX
5 жыл бұрын
Eres mi dios.
@sidarthavader9062
8 жыл бұрын
Thanks, it helped a lot! :)
@hafsaabid7454
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!
@yuganeswarman8416
8 жыл бұрын
Thank you internet
@mohammadhussainshah1475
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@trailblazer_98
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooooo much!!!!!!
@toivomvula
8 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@Creacion83
8 жыл бұрын
Calculate the equilibrium constant using the following concentrations [H2CO3] = 7.75 x 10-4 M and [CO2] = 5.65 x 10-1 M.
Пікірлер: 128