🦕 Buy the poster: 🐢 usefulcharts.com/products/evolution-classification-of-life
@AlMuqaddimahYT
2 сағат бұрын
Damn! Matt's really good at making bird sounds!
@Doobleberry
2 сағат бұрын
Those impressions at 20:58 were spot on!
@Emelefpi
2 сағат бұрын
I love this series!! One suggestion though...could you please add the turatara to the chart with reptiles since it resembles a lizard but is just a convergently evolved reptile that isn't a a lizard and is the only surviving member of its order. Sorry for the run on sentence. Keep up the great work!!
@anothersquid
2 сағат бұрын
My only snivel might be leaving out falcons, which sit somewhere between parrots and songbirds... and ties into the "most of the birds of prey" comment as they are the rest of the birds of prey :) It even looks like there's room on the chart.
@jeremyeineichner7271
2 сағат бұрын
10:51 I remember learning in school about how George Washington rode an Ankylosaur into battle
@toefoneman
39 минут бұрын
Lmao
@BirdYoumans
2 сағат бұрын
I always enjoy your work with these "useful charts". It helps us visualize things in a way that just having it in memory cannot. Thanks for your work!
@lukeszczepiorkowski41
3 сағат бұрын
Thank you for the endless entertainment
@cpegalaxy
Сағат бұрын
I can't believe how simply he explained the different groups and evolution of reptile taxonomy, even covering the time periods! Thank you for this stellar educational content
@AveragePsychologist
2 сағат бұрын
There's some theories that place Turtles and Sauropterygians as a sister group, and they're both the sister group of the classic Archosaurs in the clade Archelosauria, while Ichthyosaurs are sometimes placed in there, or they're among the most primitive Sauropsids :'v Amazing video, can't wait for the Synapsids! :D
@dstinnettmusic
2 сағат бұрын
10:51 *imagines Dinosaurs dying out due to the Napoleonic wars*
@laletemanolete
3 сағат бұрын
Favourite series
@jps0117
2 сағат бұрын
Matt, thank you for your extensive, exhaustive, impeccable research!
@macaroni3062
2 сағат бұрын
Evolutionary biology is fantastic, because it proves that what you can assume by looking at something is not always the full truth. Humans like to group Amphibians and Reptiles into a group, like with early Herpetology, because they can look similar, and they're both cold blooded, but i'm always struck by the fact that their last common ancestor's defining trait was having four limbs; being a tetrapod.
@Dr.Ian-Plect
Сағат бұрын
Reptiles being 'cold-blooded' as a general statement is obsolete. Across all reptiles past and and present, there is a wide range of physiologies.
@jakubolszewski8284
3 сағат бұрын
10:50 - God I wish hahae.
@johnking07
Сағат бұрын
I love this serie so much!!!Keep up the good job❤
@xerxes-ei9gl
2 сағат бұрын
Absolutely amazing.. loved the episode
@adriankolsters
2 сағат бұрын
Fantastic! As always. Keep up the good work.
@theonlyjezebel
3 сағат бұрын
Been waiting on this one
@RickThornquist
2 сағат бұрын
Excellent.
@TheGodofWoodstock
3 сағат бұрын
I have a suggestion. Salamanders are more closely related to frogs than caecillians. So can you add that someday? Also turtles are more closely related to archosaurs than sqaumates.
@christopherdawson233
Сағат бұрын
Please do Thomas Jefferson family tree. It’s so interesting.
@LangThoughts
29 минут бұрын
No mention of the Tuatara and its relation to Squamata?
@talfriedman1265
21 минут бұрын
no one says p-t extinction even, we say the permian triassic mass extionction event or the end permian mass extinction event and no one says k-t extinction event, we call it either the cretaceous paleogene mass extinction event or the kpg (the k stands for cretaceous in german)
@GustavoValdiviesso
2 сағат бұрын
Hi Matt, How do I get in contact with you? I'm a university professor from Brazil, and I'd like to run a few ideas by you.
@UsefulCharts
Сағат бұрын
matt@usefulcharts.com
@lunatickgeo
Сағат бұрын
If Aves is a class within a class (Reptile), what does that make Fish? Is Fish still a class? I noticed that in the chart, Actinoptrygii is labeled as a class but Bony Fish or Sarcopterygii are not. I would really love an explanation. Thanks!
@kalevader
2 сағат бұрын
Hi, please u private the old royal chart playlist. Those videos match my posters. Thanks!
@focusonrevenues
19 минут бұрын
Thank you for keeping birds separate from reptiles. I think you would enter into the same fray that is going on with the idiots who say Pluto is not a planet but a dwarf planet negating their argument as it is actually a planet.
@billyr2904
Сағат бұрын
I suppose that the reason why you included caecilians on this chart is because there are only 3 living orders of amphibians. I also still want you to change the label that says "snake-like amphibians" to "caecilians", because no one calls them by what you call them on this chart.
@montacalvos4867
Сағат бұрын
Amazing work Matt!!! one question, (I'm interested on philosophy and religion, and it would be interesting to read your answer) What do you think about the Ludwig Feuerbach's philosophical system of the origins of God? Thanks for everything!!!
@UsefulCharts
21 минут бұрын
I'm not overly familiar with him but I'm pretty sure he leaned towards God being an entirely human creation, right? I'd therefore disagree with him because, while I believe that the God of the Bible is a human creation (just like the God or gods in any religious text), I do actually believe that God does exist and that while every human concept of God is faulty, there are glimpses of truth in them and that it's better to try and say something about God (via some sort of mythos) than to say nothing at all.
@montacalvos4867
15 минут бұрын
@@UsefulCharts Thank you!!!, I thought the same thing!, I mean, it seems that each culture represents him in a very different way, but that is not a proof that he doesn't exist!!!
@montacalvos4867
11 минут бұрын
@@UsefulCharts That remembers me of the Xenophanes' system of thinking!!!
@EntrerrianoMapper
Сағат бұрын
Hey Matt, are you sure the "T-rex" you have on the thumbnail isn't AI-Generated? I have the suspicion it might be (especially considering how the lips at the corners of the mouth look like)
@itssas-qx1ff
2 сағат бұрын
I feel like I'm my own species, separated from the rest of you and i am going extinct.
@Dr.Ian-Plect
Сағат бұрын
This is an observation, not intended as a correction, although it in fact is. My intention here is to convey more advanced aspects of reading a phylogeny and understanding lineage progression. 7:04 not quite all, just the taxa after the amniote common ancestor, stem-amniotes, the lineage from the first tetrapod to the first amniotes, are not amniotes. And of course the same applies to stem-amphibians in regard to your wording. 14:00 another point for the more advanced; 'oldest type, cladistically speaking' should not be misinterpreted as meaning those groups of crown birds are more related to the bird common ancestor. It is only stating that those 2 lineages diverged earliest among all crown birds. Note further that I am specifically talking in regard to crown birds; this phylogeny only shows crown groups. Some extinct bird lineages of course diverged even earlier. So, ostriches and chickens, representatives of those first 2 divergent lineages, are _not_ more related to the common ancestor than any other bird. This point relates to a scientific paper that came out about 10 years ago or so. It was comparing T. rex collagen proteins with 21 living organisms. The group of living organisms analysed included humans, chimps, mice, chickens, ostriches, alligators and salmon. T. rex's collagen proved to be most similar to chickens and ostriches; its next closest match was to alligators, all unsurprising. It is this finding that got misinterpreted as meaning that chickens and ostriches are the closest living T. rex relative. I reiterate; this is not so; all extant birds are equally related to T. rex.
@rychei5393
56 минут бұрын
Brontosaurus... wasn't that a debunked, mis assembled dino?
@UsefulCharts
34 минут бұрын
No. It's just understood in a different way now.
@billyr2904
Сағат бұрын
Yeah, the whole thing of birds being a class within a class, doesn't make sense.
Пікірлер: 50