From democracy to policocracy with almost absolute immunity
@harshildhaduk3766
3 ай бұрын
To give more power to police was necessary. Because in most of cases, the hard work to arrest criminals by police gets failed. Because criminals goes to courts and judges release them within some days. This is injustice or not??
@jblseng
3 ай бұрын
@@harshildhaduk3766 'Them' here has to be tried by court.Not by police,police's job is to gather evidence and fight on the floor of court.
@rasoolsahib2203
3 ай бұрын
The rulers wants police have to work under their control, hence this rules. All country knows this.
@indipacifician3693
3 ай бұрын
you want Lawyers so that people like you can shout sar tan se juda and get no punishment??
@abdulmannaf5519
3 ай бұрын
Really.
@willsmathews6260
3 ай бұрын
Authentic realistic and practical views on the subject matter 🎉
@anandmohan4657
3 ай бұрын
thanks . explained in lucid way. all audio/ video recordings as evidence must within an hour of recording should be upoaded to a central registering authority so that there is no chance of wrongdoing with the evidence collected
@jayeshsuthar7862
2 ай бұрын
V.nice explained Sir (Ma'am)...amazing 👏
@Cacofonixravi
3 ай бұрын
BJP RSS plan is to take police department from state to center.
@ge4517
3 ай бұрын
I am happy there were reforms. I am worried if corruption is not tackled. There will be advantages for more corruption or abuses. Check and balance must be enforced.
@nmn8829
3 ай бұрын
Govt is never corrupt
@gulabarora2011
3 ай бұрын
Very well explained
@hirajadhav9273
2 ай бұрын
No any declaration of legal aid.. ....
@mannikagupta8829
2 ай бұрын
Very useful, thank you.
@manchikantimurty7375
3 ай бұрын
M.G Devasahayam said: Ajit Doval was my batchmate, but his understanding of Constitution, civil society is flawed. Doval's statements reflect that he thinks India is still a colonial monarchy, where people are subjects, and not a democracy, where they are citizens. The dictum “in the game of power, the ultimate justice lies with the one who is strong,” was the hallmark of Doval’s ‘military doctrine’ to be applied to Kashmir. In a Scroll.in article, social activist and author Harsh Mander said that “under this doctrine, no weapon or strategy of offence is out of bounds - bullets, pellet guns, human shields - even if these outrage international and national legal and moral codes. Victory can only be assured by military might. The only objective is to win by any means. Even if blood flows, if children are felled or blinded, if mothers weep, if liberals are outraged, if people do not vote - it does not matter. The State has to prevail by more and more military force, even over its own people.”The statements of Doval mean he has a different understanding of the Constitution, democracy and civil society. He seems to think that India is still a colonial monarchy, where people are subjects, and not a democracy wherein, they are citizens. Our Constitution opens with the words “We the People” and democracy is defined as a society in which the citizens are sovereign and command the State. There is an ocean of difference between ‘subject’ and ‘citizen.’ ‘Subject’ is one who is placed under the authority or control of a monarch or government, whereas ‘citizen’ is one entitled to the rights and privileges of a freeman. While it is the duty of a ‘subject’ to obey the government, it is the right of a ‘citizen’ to command the State because it is them who form that government by exercising the electoral franchise. In short, democracy in essence is ‘people’s power’ and not ‘State power.’
@nikhilatyoutube
3 ай бұрын
Doval see public as enemy
@shobhitdagur1086
3 ай бұрын
Till now Hindus are in majority you will find out everything in anti Hindu constitution and than run to be dhimmi. Tamila have not tasted Islamic jihad yet
@johnsaumel8659
3 ай бұрын
Amazing clarity madam has
@ramcharitracharitra-g7y
2 ай бұрын
Absolutely true 🙏💐
@gauravagarwal7870
3 ай бұрын
mam record in hindi also for last person of the society
@siddharthanvarier3342
2 ай бұрын
Respected Muktha Gupta Jee, with greater powers and empowerment, comes GREATER RESPONSIBILITIES, LARGER Accountability and most of all, adherence to pre-fixed directory time lines. I am sure these sets of laws , Madamji, are set in the RIGHT Direction, and the dichotomies could be sorted out over time. I am inclined to believe, Madamji, the benefits of set of laws, far outweigh their dichotomies
@JV-nt9bp
3 ай бұрын
LAWS passed without discussing in parliament. Police State ind. Corruption will be freely used. Judiciary is short staffed. Not feasible at the moment.
@Ramesh-tr2ih
3 ай бұрын
Enough and more time was given in the parliament to discuss the laws.But as is their won't the opposition deliberately raised ruckus in the house and prevented the discussion and there after came out of the house and lamented that the laws were passed without discussion.Every time they employ the same tactics.
@manchikantimurty7375
3 ай бұрын
Modi does not believe in Participatory Management. Top Down decision making.
@JV-nt9bp
3 ай бұрын
@@Ramesh-tr2ih When opposition who are the representative of lakhs of people who have voted them to be their spokespersons they are debarred from speaking and thrown out in record numbers. This is shutting the mouths of lakhs of people. Is this democracy or dictatorship ? 🤐
@deepakkumr
3 ай бұрын
This kind of law is not discussed in parliament as it has already gone though thousand of discussions in drafting committee.
@shantanusapru
3 ай бұрын
@@Ramesh-tr2ih Are you so ignorant, or simply an andh-bhakt??!! Almost no time was spent on discussing these laws in the Parliament! When these laws were 'passed', more than 100 Oppositions MPs had conveniently been 'suspended' on the most frivolous of 'charges'! This was no doubt done deliberately a few days previously in order for the Modi/Shah duo to pass these pernicious laws! Oh, BTW, you don't have to believe me/take my word for it! Just see the Sansad proceedings from that time! Perhaps look at facts rather than act as BJP's propaganda-spreading troll!!
@manojchoudhary4668
2 ай бұрын
Now dictatorship begins
@sayasargam
3 ай бұрын
The rea chakarborty case will haunt again, mumbai connected to bihar, still incomprehensible despite the supreme court judgement.
@sayasargam
3 ай бұрын
From forum shopping to police station shopping, mere jaan pehchaan kaha hai, waha file karwa dete hai
@gauravroy1197
3 ай бұрын
The judge protection also be removed And tell him to do their judgement😂😂
@shubchatt
3 ай бұрын
Good luck India 🇮🇳
@siddharthanvarier3342
2 ай бұрын
Upteem powers are tantamount to UPTEEN responsibilities and UPTEEN accountability for their actions/inactions
@Kishore-ct8yi
2 ай бұрын
many power are misused .
@MrSpiritsurf
3 ай бұрын
The centre is attempting to control state police also
@deepaksethi8390
3 ай бұрын
Judges have grabbed umteen powers not intended for in constitution
@valerianpereira1259
3 ай бұрын
POLICE should come under theMilitary/Army..
@MrPicklu123
3 ай бұрын
Faltu laws......
@deepakkumr
3 ай бұрын
Worth Changing, Should again be changed after 5 years. Its not Quran which cannot be changed.
@laurancesharma216
3 ай бұрын
Mukta gupta ma'am miss you in Delhi highcourt
@siddharthanvarier3342
2 ай бұрын
You are talking THEORIES , not ACTUAL PRACTICE
@skycloud1401
2 ай бұрын
Money game finally
@arvindgirgaonkar3017
2 ай бұрын
Judges have been deprived of their own unlawful earnings. Uptil now Lawyers & Judges were minting money on Bail. What is wrong in Zeto FIR? Is sifferer to move here & their to know the jurusfiction of crime? Criminals are moving from one State to Another freely whereas Police cannot move that free.
@JV-nt9bp
3 ай бұрын
Pro Govt
@rnmishra7001
3 ай бұрын
As usual she became wise after retirement. I can guarantee, make her judge again she will sing laurels for the state.
@siddharthanvarier3342
2 ай бұрын
Madamjee, criminal laws greatly depend on its INTERPRETATIONS in a given criminal case scenario, especially convincing the judges about the innocence or otherwise, and most importantly, granting of BAIL ONLY to the most DESERVING DEFENDANTS. Bail pleas cannot be regarded as a RIGHT, or a PRIVILEGED, especially by the rich sections of indian wrongdoers, and needs to be underpinned on Case-to-case basis. THE PUNISHMENT MUST COMMENSURATE WITH THE GRAVITY OF THE CRIME AND ITS NUMEROUS RAMIFICATIONS
@girishsahni
3 ай бұрын
india is trained by judges in waiting for justice upto 60 years and still not get justice.. #SHO only allowed 90 days. #BharatiyaNyayaSanhita #NewCriminalLaws #SupremeCourt
@siddharthanvarier3342
2 ай бұрын
Madam Gupta jee, LAW- ABIDiNG CITIZENS NEED NOT FEAR THESE WATERSHED LAWS. CRIMINALS NEED FEAR THE MOST
@siddharthanvarier3342
2 ай бұрын
Madamjjee, BAIL CANNOT BE A MATTER OF RIGHT and PRIVILEGE. It has to be decided on case-to- case bases.
@siddharthanvarier3342
2 ай бұрын
Madam, prima facie, I believe that giving additional powers to the police is essential and justifiable given the current sordid state of law and order in the country as a whole, and several States and Union Territories, wherein the RULE OF THE GUN is paramount and BAIL IS A RIGHT and PRIVILEGE of Criminal outfits and anti-social elements, for whom JAIL is their second HOME. If India is to progress forward (which most Indians, including your good self believe ), rhe hands of the law need to be strengthened. However, there should be CHECKS and BALANCES along the law enforcement hierarchy and PUBLIC ACCOUNTABALITY must be vigorously enforced, especially in rural areas and metro cities. Ask yourself, Madan, why have these reforms become INDISPENSABLE ? Think yourself as a victim of criminal injustice and not a subjective and theoretical upholder of law
@umesh952
3 ай бұрын
सही किया है.
@siddharthanvarier3342
2 ай бұрын
With due respect, Madam, the dichotomies may be more of academic interest, and not in real courtroom practices. The benefits and advantages of new set of laws FAR OUTWEIGH its DRAWBACKS and dichotomies No less than the distinguished CJI has welcomed these new sets of updated laws, calling it a WATERSHED I'm the annals of Indian legal jurisprudences
@zak4871
2 ай бұрын
Law for revenge
@sanjaysakhalkar3813
3 ай бұрын
Very good interview by interviewer.
@SunilSharma-oj3zu
3 ай бұрын
कुल मिलाकर हमे sichha दिया गया है की पुलिस जो वि करे उसको करने दो क्यों की हम हिजरे है
@knowledgecenterlaw1708
3 ай бұрын
Time line is possible if u see the judges take time to deliver the order deliberately delay a person who is losing want adjournment by bribing judges.
@ASeeker-9999
3 ай бұрын
Can you compare the new powers given to police to the powers police has in other democratic countries like US? Then we will have a better idea. Because if they don’t have powers then we the people itself call out the lack of law enforcement.
@sayasargam
3 ай бұрын
This victim word should be removed, unless the case proven, the very word prejudice the trial and it can be called complainant, injured complainant but victim word unnecessarily cause emotional bend and put accused to stage of guilty
@raravamudan4002
3 ай бұрын
Like a true liberal where an accused is sympathised and victim maligned
@AmitSharmaTheMariachi
3 ай бұрын
Exactly
@sayasargam
3 ай бұрын
Earlier in elopement cases, if abduction fir was filed, the consent statement s. 164 crpc could be recorded any where but now we see no such thing, thus the risk of life as wrll as tutoring, coercion to change statement.
@countrymusicfan9176
2 ай бұрын
Not in this one?
@RadhaSyam-m8u
3 ай бұрын
Absolut corrupt and partial police got absolute power but for illiterate mass caste and inflation is most important issue in election
@sanjeevverma8733
2 ай бұрын
So many chances more costdial deth
@sb-wx5kw
3 ай бұрын
Rules framed by Tadipar. What to expect?
@JV-nt9bp
3 ай бұрын
Anti-Men 😮
@manthramurthy7549
3 ай бұрын
Started their drama😂😂
@piyushsrivastavjaipuriasch8356
3 ай бұрын
Criminals are not happy with new laws.
@arvindrajput5328
3 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@raravamudan4002
3 ай бұрын
We should know the background of this ex judge. Because laws were made taking 4 years and suggestions by all. Including from judges of sc and state high courts from public and civil servants these so called liberals speak for the accused never for the victim.
@harshildhaduk3766
3 ай бұрын
What about more benefits given to woman in this laws Where is gender equality?
@Krish-cz7tg
3 ай бұрын
when give more power to police judiciary cry same goes to police indirectly they hate each other power's 😂😂
@subbaraod45
3 ай бұрын
If polic3 do not have power - how can they protect us?
@AmitSharmaTheMariachi
3 ай бұрын
Are you mad ? The issue is regarding dangerous powers for police. It's not to protect you but to smash you.
@vijayrana9594
3 ай бұрын
Kuch nhi judge aur vakil ki power kam ho gaye esliye ro rahe bechare
@avinashsingh2391
3 ай бұрын
The now Supreme Court lawyer has extraordinary understanding of criminal law very very uncomman at these times and reflects she has been groomed by lawyers best in the profession apart from her own efforts obviously. The lady taking the interview is requested to give primacy to the person being interviewed and I am certain she lacks the understanding to follow the replies.
@erjaspreet007
3 ай бұрын
Shoshan karne ke liye powers phele courts ke pass power hoti thi aab police ko de di hurdang machane ke liye
@arvindrajput5328
3 ай бұрын
🎉🎉🎉
@humungous09
2 ай бұрын
No worries! Let them take liberties. How many girls are being raped and killed with several loopholes bailing out the criminals? Didn't we all pray for stricter laws? Let the women and minor girls be protected from sexist, lusty, and influential scoundrels. The laws could always be reviewed if they ever get draconian. It's important to address crime against women! About time, the tardy, protracted, and inefficient judicial process is thrown out of the window.
@harshildhaduk3766
3 ай бұрын
Finally wish of Singham is completed. 😊😊😊 That movie very well explained than this discussion that why police needs more power.
@shantanusapru
3 ай бұрын
If you're taking advice/notes from a movie, well, then you're the most important & most urgent problem that this nation is facing...!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Just like an ignorant andh-bhakt to take gyaan from a movie...just like they take gyaan from social media or Whatsapp Univ. or Godi Media......🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 What a m0r0n!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@tarzenthewondercar
3 ай бұрын
May be you not face police in complaintant Or accused role. That's why you talking shit. Then you know what is real corruption in India🇮🇳. I hope you don't need or face police in life.
@tarzenthewondercar
3 ай бұрын
It's movie, reality very worst
@aaamar-tf4hj
2 ай бұрын
Judge sauna ap log kuch ukaad nahi sakta to koi to koi ukadnA padegasamjna chahiye
@ramphalbishnoi8906
3 ай бұрын
Police state
@Navviku
3 ай бұрын
Ye bde banglow govt salary se kaise ban pate hai how is possible? Gazab
@deepakkumr
3 ай бұрын
The Question is will it help in speedy Justice, wo cares whether police has power or no power. We want Justice quickly.
@ytadltspv
3 ай бұрын
define justice!! even with existing laws police beat people to death in lockups, foist false cases to show #s or just as plain politicians weapons..... u think u will get 'speedy justice'???
@shantanusapru
3 ай бұрын
These new laws will lead to a) filing of more frivolous cases; b) delaying/delayed filing of cases by the police; c) delaying in examining evidence (as the proper resources for forensics is pretty much lacking); d) increased pendency of cases due to increased case load in courts -- so, you make up your mind whether this will lead to 'speedy justice' or not... And, oh, also, this will increase police bribery & arbitrariness...so, hurray for that too!!
@deepakkumr
3 ай бұрын
@@shantanusapru I think there are issues which goes in future. At present the punishment of spurious drugs food items , question paper leak is very less 1-3 years. It should be at least 100 years with full confiscation of property removal to citizenship along with jail for all family members of criminal.
@shantanusapru
3 ай бұрын
@@deepakkumr "I think there are issues which goes in future." --- As opposed to the issues which concern only the past? What are you talking about?? Law is an ever-evolving field, and most issues go into the future as well... So??? "At present the punishment of spurious drugs food items , question paper leak is very less 1-3 years. It should be at least 100 years with full confiscation of property removal to citizenship along with jail for all family members of criminal." -- I agree that the punishment for some of the crimes is obsolete (esp. the fines/monetary punishment) and for many the sentencing minimums need to be changed -- for some they need to be cut down, and for others they need to be more stringent... However, those are not the issues at hand/we're discussing right now...! The issues are: 1) there is/was no need to change the laws en masse, in toto - selective modifications would have been better (faster, causing less chaos & confusion); 2) the egregious manner in which this was actually done; 3) the fact that the 'new' laws are pretty much not new, and are ~80% copy-paste, thus negating/obviating the very rationale of 'changing' them!; 4) the fact that some of the new laws have been made much more arbitrary & stringent -- leading to potentially more arbitrariness & corruption in the policing & legal systems, not to mention the total disregard of human/individual rights & freedoms (incl. & esp. the freedom of speech/expression!). In short, most/much of the new laws are unwanted, unnecessary modifications (but not enough!) which were passed by highly dubious methods, and they are pernicious to the extent of being anti-democratic...!
@deepakkumr
3 ай бұрын
@@shantanusapru "I think there are issues which goes in future." --- As opposed to the issues which concern only the past? What are you talking about?? Law is an ever-evolving field, and most issues go into the future as well... So??? - Ans: Law is ever evolving - I would like to have all laws having expiry date. People are resistant to change, but criminals evolve. The issues are: 1) there is/was no need to change the laws en masse, in toto - selective modifications would have been better (faster, causing less chaos & confusion); Ans: You told earlier Law is ever evolving. We are still going with British era laws. This is sufficient to change it. I know people are resistant to change. 2) the egregious manner in which this was actually done; Ans: Its not. It’s passed by parliament. Decision of speaker is final. Opposition has not raised no confidence in speaker prior to start of session. It’s of least concern. I am not political animal. 3) the fact that the 'new' laws are pretty much not new, and are ~80% copy-paste, thus negating/obviating the very rationale of 'changing' them!; Ans: I did not read the old law. New law I have read. Its easy to understand. Serial numbers are given. Its good. It does not have sub clause. It Could have been better drafted. Murder by Bullet, Knife, Sword, By cutting in pieces, burning, etc should have different sentences. Depending on nature of cruelty ranging from 10,20,30,40 etc. But most crimes are clubbed together. 4) the fact that some of the new laws have been made much more arbitrary & stringent -- leading to potentially more arbitrariness & corruption in the policing & legal systems, not to mention the total disregard of human/individual rights & freedoms (incl. & esp. the freedom of speech/expression!). In short, most/much of the new laws are unwanted, unnecessary modifications (but not enough!) which were passed by highly dubious methods, and they are pernicious to the extent of being anti-democratic...! Ans: You need to read and point out. Like I am doing Number 63 rape. Punishment of 10 years. How do you record a consensual sex? Gov should provide a draft of consensual sex. Is that draft not violation of privacy. Who would like to keep record of all sexual activities? Over glorification of rape. Corruption is hidden and is underestimated 173 - One year punishment is too less. 174 Election fraud one year jail, 178 Counterfeit note 10 year its too less. It can be argued. On what is good or bad. But I as a citizen is concerned about by safety my right to self defence , corruption free society .I am not concerned how the law is passed
@kedarnathpanda8724
3 ай бұрын
Pl tell why judges would have unlimited powers to select judges , fix their own salary, drag cases for decades, allow advocates to loot, varied with contrary judgement & lastly contempt to gag opinion on corrupt judiciary.
@indipacifician3693
3 ай бұрын
exactly
@indipacifician3693
3 ай бұрын
ironic the same court releases Kancha iliahs book on hindus saying its freedom of speech but bans Hum do hamare baarah calling it offensive. when documents are clear who the owner is who the tenant is and tenant refuses to vacate then why the court needs 20 years. are the judges having such low IQ?
@prashantsharma-nq2zs
3 ай бұрын
There are teething problems but it will settle down in time to come. Success chances are greater than 0%
@ytadltspv
3 ай бұрын
thats always been modis base-rule - stupid gutless indian citizens will stay quiet for fear of ruling govts harassment and will get used to lower and lesser ' rights' .
@asimahmed885
3 ай бұрын
Copy paste law.
@mintusaren895
3 ай бұрын
Kan khulke, IAS VS IFS.
@drrmdebnath8356
3 ай бұрын
Is she bangali or punjabi????
@harshildhaduk3766
3 ай бұрын
In most of cases, police arrests criminals. Than criminals go to court and get released or get bail by judges. Police was weak in it. Now they have got power. But they should not misuse such powers. They should use these powers against criminals and for safe guarding citizens.
@shantanusapru
3 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣What an 1d10t!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@harshildhaduk3766
3 ай бұрын
Those who thinks police get more power should watch singham movie again. They will better understand it . Police were arresting criminals and court judges were releasing them. Than where were peoples that doesn't like that police get more power.
@tarzenthewondercar
3 ай бұрын
More power then more mind will corrupt😅. Watch video on KZitem how police abused people. And how they helpful for common man.
Пікірлер: 140