Thank you so much. The third order suddenly popped up in linear control systems and I couldn't figure out how to solve for the frequency and damp factor. This video helped me out immensely.
@alejandrobanolescobar6160
3 жыл бұрын
I want to congratulate your effort for make and share this cleary explanation. It was very useful because I was looking for an example about analysis of the transient response of third order systems and here it is. Have a nice day.
@AL-wc8oy
Жыл бұрын
This is miracle. I couldn't find any videos about multiple poles
@hiteshlohiya7346
3 жыл бұрын
What to do if all the p values is real?
@WaqasKh-um9tk
9 ай бұрын
I don't know you but i say to you that you are the only one of which i did subscribe because my heart 💖 was stop to your chanel
@nitinsiva1044
2 жыл бұрын
That indeed was really helpful. Thank you
@egoworks5611
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@kshitijkumar4118
5 жыл бұрын
Helped a lot, thank you...
@jsweatman7118
2 жыл бұрын
i found this very helpful in understanding what is happening, i have a question though, your TF=1/(s^3+24.4s^2+109s+500) how would changing the numerator effect this for example (s+2)/(s^3+24.4s^2+109s+500) ?
@ATC_ShubhamK
2 жыл бұрын
I can hear you for all day 😌
@edrismussa3688
2 жыл бұрын
thank you very clear
@kshitijkumar4118
5 жыл бұрын
I want to learn MATLAB in depth , can you suggest from where should start or from where should I take a course on it?
@theryderproject5053
5 жыл бұрын
There are many materials on Lynda if you have access to that. There's also Matlab Onramp courses available through Mathworks.
@KMBeckwith
10 ай бұрын
What do i do if Second order dominance isn't true?
@ViniciusAraujo1
26 күн бұрын
Could your or anyone tell me to what is this function transfer related to? I just need it to going further with some practice classes.
@AkashS-zt1ue
9 күн бұрын
She standard form of second order transfer
@wj95.
2 жыл бұрын
If there is a K/{(s+a)(s^2+bs+c)} transfer function, If we ignore the s=-a pole(a>0), can we consider it K/{a*(s^2+bs+c)}?
@yusufmuhamed7234
Жыл бұрын
❤
@kartikeyachoudhary5742
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot
@sebastiancastanedaespinosa4341
2 жыл бұрын
how do i solve that when the assumption is not valid?, thank you.
@sasukekianhoong6130
2 жыл бұрын
what if the validity is equal to 5 ?
@learnmechatronics2545
5 жыл бұрын
thanks for the explanation.
@صقرصقر-ذ9ل
4 жыл бұрын
I need ask you a question (control system) How can call with you ??
@webslinger2011
5 жыл бұрын
Must P/Wn(Zeta) always be greater than 5?
@theryderproject5053
5 жыл бұрын
If you are assuming dominance of the second order component (as is the case here) then the answer is yes for the assumption to be considered valid.
@webslinger2011
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I guess my course work result was false then.
@muqadasfatima6643
9 ай бұрын
Pro
@Eng-ahmedali-o7l
4 жыл бұрын
i need a general form for 3 rd order please
@mq2851
4 жыл бұрын
بتعمل ايه هنا يا اسطا ؟ دا اليوتيوب دا طلع اوضتين وصالة ^_^
@scorpus_gaming
4 жыл бұрын
What if their is equation at numerator
@theryderproject5053
4 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure what you mean. Sorry.
@scorpus_gaming
4 жыл бұрын
@@theryderproject5053( s+7)/(s^3+8s^2+6s) how to get damping ratio and natural frequency
@theryderproject5053
4 жыл бұрын
@@scorpus_gaming You would do the same process as in the video, however because you now have a zero (through the s in the numerator) you are going to introduce some additional error to your analysis. However, if you're doing it manually, you're just going to have to accept that (but you can roughly assess the extent of the impact based on how close the zero is to the imaginary axis - similar to the 5x rule for poles).
Пікірлер: 35