And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”
@MrProsat
2 ай бұрын
Isn't that the pure sacrifice offered worldwide that Malachi prophesied about?
@H3H3.podcast
2 ай бұрын
Yeah and Ignatius, Iraeneus, Justin Martyr, Polycarp, Eusebius, Clement of Rome, and every other known Christian who died for Christ until Huldrych Zwingli was a false teacher, and is in hell. But don’t worry you are super good and love Jesus way more than those losers. Wow I’m so glad Jesus finally revealed his true church in the Middle Ages.
@MrProsat
2 ай бұрын
@@H3H3.podcast I detect sarcasm!
@H3H3.podcast
2 ай бұрын
@@MrProsat you’re right I’m sorry 😢
@MrProsat
2 ай бұрын
@@H3H3.podcast It was funny!
@user-we4op2rt6h
13 күн бұрын
The head of the church is our LORD Jesus Christ and not the pope or the catholic, The truth is in the bible,which is the inspired word of God and not no man made institution. The Bible says seek the truth and it will set you free.If you do seek the truth,God will set you free from all men made religions.
@rinnah478
9 ай бұрын
Thank you for explaining what I grew up in and my family are devoted to. I’m in awe of God for His deliverance for me from this system into the true gospel. The ongoing revelation of His mercy and compassion for me in His deliverance and salvation continues to astound me. Thank you Father Son Holy Spirit
@1234poppycat
8 ай бұрын
On the contrary 1/ 3 Church of England Bishops in just the last 2 years have come to Catholicism to get closer to Christ -- think of all the power and wealth they gave up to get closer to Christ !! 2/ 14 scripture passages support Catholic Eucharist (start with John 6 )
@hamidrabiipour9707
6 ай бұрын
FYI, you are in mountains of trouble if MacArthur is your spiritual leader, as you will end up like him; arrogant, misguided, false, judgemental, hateful & of-course you will still call yourself a Christian! Something to ponder about! 🤔
@allguitarplayersrule
6 ай бұрын
There is no such thing as the true gospel. Christianity is like a sport something you play. Vatican has 35 miles of shelves containing religious documents. Still not as big as John MacArthurs ego. He has 1 book we created to make the world civil and obedient. The very purpose of Christianity so the meek, righteousness those above can inhabit the earth. John MacArthur and his founding fathers the plantation owners who fabricated Bible inerrancy to defend slavery , the kkk and now Christian supremacy though his personal interpretation of the Bible we created over 1600 years ago? Meaningless
@allguitarplayersrule Jesus Christ is the only way the truth and the life
@dentonhunt2640
22 күн бұрын
Praise be Jesus in the Eucharist Everyone should take a Bible Your heart , and your quietness and sit quietly with the blessed sacrament, and let Jesus whisper to your heart He waits for us Peace
@dentonhunt2640
22 күн бұрын
Eternal Father I offer you the body, blood , soul , and Divinity, of Your dearly beloved Son, our Lord Jesus Christ in atonement for our sins and those of the whole world For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world - divine mercy prayer 🙏
@MsBeachLizard
Жыл бұрын
We were stationed at Zaragoza Air Base in Spain but lived in Zaragoza back in mid-to-late 80s. What an awesome tour! It was an amazing place. This parade he references is so stunning in riches and pageantry, it would blow your mind. But the whole place (Spain) is rich in history.
@anasanchez2503
8 ай бұрын
Spain's history is as rich as many other countries around the world! One needs either to read or to travel more...😊
@johnhenrick2298
3 ай бұрын
Stunning in riches and pageantry, no doubt, but idolatrous, nonetheless.
@andrewrolwes6034
3 ай бұрын
@@johnhenrick2298 Tru dat. Catholics see statues and they worship. Can't help it. Thank goodness true Christians worship in cpmpletely stripped, barren, well carpeted, comfortable and image-free strip malls or former warehouse locations where true worship happens. True worship is inconoclastic, like how the Muslims do it.
@carolinajackson7621
2 ай бұрын
I come from Spain, & I understand what u mean. Grew up Catholic, but God saved me when I was 25
@JesusProtects
Ай бұрын
Sadly 70% of the population are Catholics. And catholicism is from the pits of hell.
@gtilusso2101
2 ай бұрын
“Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, and let not thine heart be glad when he stumbleth: Lest the LORD see it, and it displease him, and he turn away his wrath from him.” Proverbs 24:17-18
@scrpnby4207
9 күн бұрын
No one is rejoicing. We are called to test what anyone claiming to be a Christian says with scripture. The loving thing to do is to educate believers on what the catholic church believes because there needs to be the realization that catholics are a mission field and not fellow believers.
@markevans8054
2 күн бұрын
Ask a Catholic, on what basis should God allow you into heaven ? 90% will reply.... I'm a good person. No one is good, only God is good. They never mention Faith in Christ. That's very disconcerting, because they're not saved. That's why we evangelize Catholics. Glory to God ✝️
@tucker3601
2 ай бұрын
I can get behind criticism of the Roman Catholic Church, but I can’t accept that real Christian worship is go to contemporary rock concert and receive a 45 minute self-help lecture. The early church, virtually all church fathers, and the most learned theologians for hundreds of years, were all in agreement with so many areas which modern day protestants completely disregard. These pastors all in the risk of becoming deluded and deciding their own interpretations of scripture is ultimately true, that history and philosophy doesn’t matter at all.
@paulorazulike9284
Ай бұрын
I was going to comment, but seeing that my Catholic brethren has already said it all, I will just pray for the preacher and those who believe him 🙏
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@nathanoppy *Jesus did not say it's literally physical though. Bible says it's literally spiritual. 1 Cor 10:3-4.* *John 6, Jesus already made it clear it is not physical. Jesus said in John 6:35 saying "eating Him = believing in Him".* *John 6:40,47, 54 all reiterated the same thing. "eating Jesus for eternal life = believing in Him for eternal life".* you said bible is clear in John 6 that Christ is being literal about communion.
@josephshriver1695
Жыл бұрын
So glad someone teaches this!! Ive listened to this 5 times
@1234poppycat
Жыл бұрын
Why not read your bible to get the truth start with John 6 then go onto the other 13 scripture that support Catholic Eucharist ...
@Slpy0509
Жыл бұрын
@@1234poppycat They are twisted to support catholic doctrine.
@jayonnaj18
11 ай бұрын
I firmly agree with you @josephshriver1695! My late husband was Catholic, but not devout, but, PRAISE GOD, he and I got saved by believing the gospel of Jesus Christ in 1989! I'm an elderly widow now, and looking forward to seeing my husband again in glory! I listen to Ps. John's teaching on this frequently also, so I can be prepared to let others know of this satanic blasphemy of the mass!
@ilonkastille2993
11 ай бұрын
You listened to lies , nonsense and ignorance. Only knowledge of the truth can make you discern.
@trumpvanempowertrump1013
11 ай бұрын
five times and your still ignorant: read John 6:53 and understand
@normangensler7380
Жыл бұрын
Could someone explain the many KZitem sites that are proliferating and using McArthur's Sermons as though they are new? Simply copying and replaying past sermons that Grace to You has recorded on their own site doesn't seem right. Why would people not simply use the original source sermons, instead of having them offered by someone else?
@zulu0219
11 ай бұрын
$$$$ stealing material to monitize
@stockinettestitch
11 ай бұрын
I like when channels do this because I enjoy the comments.
@billyingram3492
11 ай бұрын
It shouldn't matter as long as the gospel is being spread. I take it your a catholic.
@Snoddypossie
11 ай бұрын
Because the gospel is to go to all the world by being passed on by the hearer. This is exactly what should happen.
@hamidrabiipour9707
6 ай бұрын
Hey Norman, that's because demons work in mysterious ways & of-course count on false preachers like MacArthur & idiots who believe in his misguided theology. It's certainly not Christlike to create a division in Christian community.
@corn1078
10 ай бұрын
This was an amazing teaching , and I learned so much from this! Just on a personal note, I'm a pretty young guy and grew up Catholic from my cradle until I turned 24. I kinda accepted the Catholic doctrine until my anxiety disorder actually made me question everything, so I did some digging and I'm like wow they're making me live in fear. So i don't want to live in fear and without assurance. Then, I got hit by a Ephesians 2: 8-10. and then I was like a huge weight was off my shoulders. But no doubt when they baptize you as a baby and indoctrinate you as a young child, the brainwashing is very deep. I'm glad God shook me awake
@hamidrabiipour9707
9 ай бұрын
Hey corn, based on what you have written It is obvious that your anxiety disorder has spiked again. Get some help buddy 😅
@ranospiteri5776
9 ай бұрын
St. Peter asserts that “baptism ... saves” us (1 Peter 3:21). If a dispute arises as to whether “baptism saves” us or not, and an inspired Bible passage states “baptism saves,” and Mark 16:16 also asserts that “he who believes and is baptized will be saved” - are those not answers to the very question being asked? How could they be any more plain and obvious than they are? Baptism saves you Acts 2:39 “For the promise is unto you, and to your (children,)(Mal. 1:11) Is a Catholic Eucharist
@mynamedoesntmatter8652
9 ай бұрын
God bless you, corn. I’m thankful that you’re on that narrow, rocky path with our Lord and Savior. He will always be with you every step. I look forward to seeing you one Day when we leave this earth. I’ll keep you in my prayers too, because we all can use other people praying for us. I am so happy for you! Love in Christ Jesus ~
@nguyen4814
9 ай бұрын
So by the statement that you just made those who were baptized as an infant ( who are not yet believer) need to be baptized again when they believe to be saved? Most Roman Catholic are not Baptized after they believed; they are baptized before they believed. Jesus task us to Batized those who believe, not the other way around. Those who believed are already saved; for example the thief on the cross, was he baptized?
@srich7503
8 ай бұрын
@@nguyen4814 so by this statement you show your ignorance of Catholic baptism vs Protestant baptism. They mean two different things, especially when/if you consider the sacrament of Confirmation at teen years in the whole mix. To answer the question about the thief on the cross, No he wasnt. But what was the impediment beyond his own control AFTER his conversion that God can overcome? Hmmmmmm
@nosuchthing8
2 ай бұрын
Hey, the title is wrong. It's heresy, not hersy!
@Ken-dh2te
5 күн бұрын
In "1551" the Council of Trent declared the doctrine of transubstantiation is a dogma of faith in Roman Catholicism. 1551....not 100 AD. 300 AD, 400 AD, 500 AD It took 1,500 years to decide on this? Bah Bah Baaaah
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *You kept dodging ... You claimed Jesus and APostles did not take doctrines from God's Word only. So please list out which other source they took doctrines from. Cite some examples.* 1 2 3 *You can't.*
@scrpnby4207
9 күн бұрын
Technically the apostles got doctrine from scripture and from the mouth of Jesus Christ, and therefore God himself.
@billpletikapich5640
6 күн бұрын
@@scrpnby4207 If they got doctrine from Scripture, it would have to be the OT, correct?
@waihekegodtimechurch2799
4 жыл бұрын
Very helpful insights, and necessary to understand just how deceiving the mass is and the curses associated with it. Thank you for making this available.
@1234poppycat
2 жыл бұрын
He is just showing his lack of understanding of Catholicism. If he could criticise without misrepresentation we could have some discussion -- I have just highlighted his mistakes in my posting above !!
@jesusfaith2232
Жыл бұрын
@@1234poppycat The Enemy from within destroying the Catholic Church ..by E. Gajewski Over one hundred years ago Pope Pius X warned us of the enemy not from without but from within. Vatican II, the cult of man. Pope Paul 6th equated Vatican II to the cult of man. Vatican II foundationally speaking comes from man and not God. It is the religion of man which hides behind the whole “human dignity” babble just as Pope St. Pius X warned. Vatican II is not centered around the Church’s teaching on the Social Kingship of Christ but rather of the united brotherhood of man. Archbishop Lefebvre understood when he said, ““We cannot work together with these enemies of Our Lord’s reign. “We cannot follow these people. They’re in apostasy, … “How did the union, against nature, between the Church and the Revolution give birth to the monster (Vatican II), whose incoherencies now fill with fright even its most ardent supporters?” (Archbishop Lefebvre, “They Have Uncrowned Him”, 1988) ….. Me: Pope Frances : 30th Jan 2021 Pope criticises Catholics who reject Vatican 2 Quote “ Those who reject the teachings of the Second Vatican Council are placing themselves outside the church, either you are with the Church and therefore you follow the council, or you interpret it in your own away - according to your desire - and you do not stand with the Church,” Warning against a mentality which says “we are the true Catholics”, he cited those believers who split from the Roman Church following the First Vatican Council (1869-70) over the teaching on papal infallibility, and are part of the “Old Catholic Church”. Francis said that today this group ordains women, which runs contrary to official Catholic teaching. The 84-year-old Jesuit Pope told members of the National Catechetical Office of the Italian Bishops’ Conference. Me: look up the list of “Old Catholic Church “ ~~~~~~~~~~ The Pew study, issued Aug. 5, showed that 69% of all self-identified Catholics said they believed the bread and wine used at Mass are not Jesus, but instead "symbols of the body and blood of Jesus Christ." The other 31% believed in the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, known as transubstantiation. "Most Catholics who believe that the bread and wine are symbolic do not know that the church holds that transubstantiation occurs," said Gregory Smith, associate director of research at Pew Research Center in Washington. "Overall, 43% of Catholics believe that the bread and wine are symbolic and also that this reflects the position of the church. "Still, one in five Catholics - 22% - reject the idea of transubstantiation, even though they know about the church's teaching," Smith said. Me: Even Robert Barron was shocked at the findings!.. Look at the Catholic Charismatic Movement, I’ve posted in more detail and growing fast. One pope said you out if you reject Vat2 the other says you in apostasy? Frances says the Old Catholic Church ordain women yet he ordains gay priests, gays taking mass, shuffle priests….heck pope Frances has his face on the LGBT magazine, beware RC you might be outside the church, funny when one pope discredits another pope …”apostolic succession “….ha ha So cult man you in or out 😂……
@KristiLEvans1
Жыл бұрын
@@1234poppycat then, by all means, tell us what the teaching is, today, under Pope Bergoglio. You must remember that these sermons were preached during the papacy of John-Paul II. Most Protestants don’t fully understand the initial sea change of Vatican II, and the further theological destabilization under Pope Francis.
@1234poppycat
Жыл бұрын
@@KristiLEvans1 the change is only in emphasis. No teaching is changed as for the Eucharist being biblical see ""Where Is the Eucharist in the Bible? | (In Depth Bible Study) " on youtube
@seventhstar
Жыл бұрын
This guy doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground about the Catholic Faith, The Catholic Mass and what the Catholic Church stands for. The Catholic Church was the first church started upon the crucifixion of Christ. And most certainly there long before his arrogant ass ever was!
@Ribastein
9 ай бұрын
As humans made in the image of God is it that surprising that we have taken our understanding of the Bible and splintered into 100s of protestant faiths. Is this what Jesus wanted when prayed at the end of John.....may they be one as we are one.
@hamidrabiipour9707
8 ай бұрын
Hey riba, it sure is sad to see that the loving gospel of Jesus Christ being misrepresented by idiots like MacArthur who call themselves Christians but carry out satanic agendas.
@THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE.
5 ай бұрын
Amen
@donaldcooley897
4 ай бұрын
@RibaRanks , Christ is talking about saved believers who are members of the one Body of Christ his Church which is all saved believers who are baptized by the spirit into his body. 1 Cor. 12 : 13 ; witch is the one true Church . it has no name , all saved believers are the Church and it is still being built as sinners get saved Acts 2 : 47 ; so you catholics should read and study the scriptures so you can know the Truth . that the catholic church has turned into a cult , with a false Gospel of work base salvation and unbiblical dogmas and doctrines and the catechism . and salvation is only in the C C and it sacraments , and out side of the church there is no salvation Which is a fabricated deceptive lie from satan him self .
@hamidrabiipour9707
4 ай бұрын
@@donaldcooley897 just like MacArthur, you have certainly misunderstood the message of the scripture. Reading the Bible is one thing & comprehension is another. You will certainly benefit from watching a few videos by Dr John Bergsma who finally left Calvinism & became Catholic. It'll help your faith journey & spiritual development.
@giocatore_83
3 ай бұрын
@@hamidrabiipour9707 I don't know how anyone can read the bible and think it supports the Catholic system. Especially when it comes to praying to Mary and the saints. Even if it was not sinful to pray why would you even want to risk it in the first place?
@salachenkoforley7382
9 ай бұрын
Hebrews 7:11-12 New Catholic Bible 11 Another High Priest according to the Order of Melchizedek. If perfection was therefore achieved through the Levitical priesthood, on the basis of which the Law was given to the people, *what need would there have been for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek* rather than one according to the order of Aaron? 12 *For when there is any change in the priesthood, there must also be a change in the Law.* ------Jesus established the New Testament Priesthood among His apostles. This Priest is passed down to every Catholic Priest today. 1 Peter 2:5 New Catholic Bible 5 You, too, are like living stones, *being built up into a spiritual temple and a holy priesthood to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.* ------According to Peter, Jesus set up the New Priesthood to offer daily Mass for all. This is one of the Priest main function according to the Scriptures that you're confused with. Acts 20:7 New Catholic Bible 7 On the first day of the week, when we gathered for *the breaking of the bread,* Paul spoke to the people, and because he was going to leave on the next day, he continued speaking until midnight. ------ "The breaking of the bread" refers to the celebration of the Mass, which is the ONLY form of WORSHIP that is ACCETABLE to the Almighty God. This would mean, what you're doing at your churches every Sunday is anything but a Biblical Christian worship.
@solafide9533
Ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *Can you explain how a Singular Key in Isaiah 22 became Plural Keys in MAt 16? Lol? Transformed by the tales of Roman religion?*
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *But they did. Bible does say Do Not Go Beyond Scriptures and Man shall live by Every Word of God, 1 Cor 4:6, Mat 4:4. RCs say it's not.* *180+ verses say Jesus, Apostles and NT Church all took doctrines from God's Word only. RCs say it's not.* *So many early writings mentioned the Exact Word "Scripture Alone" or "Scriptures is the pillar of truth". RCs say it's not.* you said I answered. And it is very clear that the early church did not teach sola scriptura when there was not a NT yet.
@johnsimmons5951
2 ай бұрын
All the apostolic churches, ie Catholic , Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, & Oriental Churches agree on: + the definition & number of sacraments + the Mass being a sacrifice + the bread and wine offerings becoming the body blood soul and divinity of Jesus Christ. Also all agree that a sacrifice is the killing of the victim and the sprinkling of the victim’s blood on the altar (ie not just the killing of the victim). Also all agree that Jesus Christ died once on Calvery (ie he is not re-crucified during Mass). And Calvery is made present during Mass. The ongoing sacrifice is the action of Christ (as priest) offers his blood (as victim) on the altar in heaven in front of the Trinity.
@carlocosta3751
2 ай бұрын
Just read scripture The Romanist wont kill you any more ( like they used to) if you read it.
@zachdawson5620
2 ай бұрын
Christ was crucified over top of the centries prior hidden mercy seat, he did make the sacrifice, he was made high priest and sacrifice when the rocks rent. Ron wyatt was granted discovery of this evidence
@rbnmnt3341
2 ай бұрын
Apparently you totally ignore the book of Hebrews. Probably because it totally destroys the eucharist. Hebrews 10:12, "But this man after he had offered ONE sacrifice for sins FOREVER , say down on the right hand of the Father of." Why do you guys have such trouble with words such as ONE, ONCE and ONLY? It's not difficult. Those words don't take interpretation from anyone. It's not a mystery why your church hives itself sole authority to interpret scripture and that it tells you, "we'll tell you what scripture means."
@jamestrotter3162
2 ай бұрын
" For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are sanctified."-Heb. 10:14.
@johnsimmons5951
2 ай бұрын
@@rbnmnt3341 The Interpretation that a single event in one place & in the past is made present multiple times is not an invention of the Catholic Church, when Jews celebrate the Passover, the exodus from Egypt is Liturgically made present to each family each year they eat the Passover meal, ie the same as when a Mass/ Eucharist is celebrated.
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *You are still dodging .. Neither does 1 Tim **3:15** ever said "Roman religion is your final authority or Church is the final authority". So what ns are you spouting?* you siad There is not one verse which says "scripture alone is your authority." However, the Bible does say in 1 Timothy that the Church is the pillar and bulwark of truth."
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@bridgefin *Again deflecting Roman pagan? You cannot answer? Where in the John 6 ever taught Roman Mass (sacrifice Jesus on the altar back to God) or Roman pagan Transubstantiation (elements transform into Jesus to be eaten by RCs)? Where? If you can find that i will give you a lollipop.*
@ranospiteri5776
9 ай бұрын
1 John 4: 2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
@scrpnby4207
9 күн бұрын
Came in the flesh encompasses the entire Gospel message of Jesus Christ.
@nosuchthing8
2 ай бұрын
This video came out 4 years ago and you can't fix the typo in the title 😮
@FloridaGirl-
Ай бұрын
This isn’t Grace to you either. Which is Mac Arthurs own station. This is someone uploading his sermons. So it’s not his official channel.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *YOu did not answer yet you claimed you had? You failed to answer once again. If Roman Catholicism is truth or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.* - submit to Roman pope to be saved - devote to Roman Mary to be saved - be in Roman Church to be saved - partake Roman sacraments to be saved - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved - do lots of works to be saved
@solafide9533
Ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *Misquoting Luke 10:16 again? Jesus was addressing 72 disciples. Not Apostles. You are guilty of changing God's Word. Your end is the plagues of Rev 22:18-19. Like your Roman pagan religion.* Jesus Sends Out the Seventy-Two Luk 10:1 After these things the Lord appointed seventy others also, and sent them two by two before His face into every city and place where He Himself was about to go. Luk 10:16 *He who hears you hears Me, he who rejects you rejects Me* , and he who rejects Me rejects Him who sent Me." The Return of the Seventy-Two Luk 10:17 Then the seventy returned with joy, saying, "Lord, even the demons are subject to us in Your name." you said Jesus said of the Apostles "He who hears you hears me" To submit to Peter is to submit to Christ - that is what, "To hear you is to hear me" means.
@JustinSwell
6 ай бұрын
I like how he hints that this sermon might be incoherent compared to his normal ones.
@dananderson6697
4 ай бұрын
Tell me you didn't listen to a word without telling me you didn't listen to a word.
@jackieann5494
2 ай бұрын
Justin ....yup ! And FULL of misinformation !!! Unbelievable false claims. This man is going to have a lot to answer for. A lie is a lie and this talk is almost nothing BUT lies. I'm shocked to the core . Most of this is verifiably false ... Breathtaking .
@markevans8054
2 күн бұрын
When I pay my indulgences, should I pay by credit card or Cash ? Because indulgences are biblical right ? What a scam. Half the priests are practicing homosexuals.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *You are still dodging ... Jesus did not offer any “unbloodied sacrifice”. Again you are adding to Scriptures what it does not say. Rev 22:18-19 is for you.*
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *You are still dodging ... There is no verse that said anything about unbloodied sacrifice. The onus is on you to prove your false claims.* *Doctrines come from what Scriptures Does Say. Not from what Scriptures Does Not Say or self claims.* you said Point to me that verse that says "there are no more unbloody sacrifices"?
@ranospiteri5776
9 ай бұрын
(Do not lessen to wolves) When Jesus says, “Verily, verily” or “Truly, truly,” in the gospels you had better Believe
@jediv3381
22 күн бұрын
@ranospiteri5776 *Then why are 95% of Roman pagan doctrines not from Scriptures?* you said (Do not lessen to wolves) When Jesus says, “Verily, verily” or “Truly, truly,” in the gospels you had better Believe
@scrpnby4207
9 күн бұрын
Catholics don’t accept that the Bible is infallible and the only source of revelation. Their “sacred traditions “ override the Bible. When there is a conflict between the Bible and sacred tradition, tradition is taken as the truth.
@PaxMundi118
7 ай бұрын
Where is the doctrine of Sola Scriptura in the Bible? For it to be a binding doctrine would not it have to be substantiated clearly in Holy Scripture?
@Nose77904
4 ай бұрын
I think it is right next to the Holy Trinity...oops, that's not there either. ;-)
@PaxMundi118
4 ай бұрын
@@Nose77904 I was talking about material sufficiency, not explicitness. My question, and it is uniquely important to Sola Scriptura (or Solo Scriptura, which is often applied in practice) is whether the teaching is substantiated in Scripture. The importance of this is obvious because of the very nature of the doctrine. The material sufficiency of the Trinity is overwhelming in Scripture. That is why is was proclaimed a dogma by an Ecumenical Council. Unfortunately, with Sola Scriptura poorly applied within a given community, like the Jehovah's Witness and Oneness Pentecostals, you can come to non-Trinatarian conclusions. The Council's decision is, for them, in no way binding. Other Protestants run into serious and similar problems. If Scripture is the only infallible rule for the Church, how do you define the Canon? Yes, that old question won't go away... R.C. Sproul, the great Presbyterian scholar, said that the Bible is "a fallible Canon of infallible books." This is incoherent. How can a book, a book that was contested for centuries, like Revelation, be trusted as infallible, if the Canon is fallible. Essentially you would be guessing what is Holy Scripture and what is not, based on subjective criteria. This could not be the sole trustworthy rule for the Church. So the issue of Sola Scriptura not being substantiated in Scripture is indeed a serious problem for Protestants. You may want to say it is the best system, or the most reliable, or consistent, but I do not think you cannot say with any certainty that it is true -- and you must acknowledge it's shortcomings, internal contradictions and the interpretative issues it creates. I could get into all of that, but perhaps if you feel that there is very strong, implicit basis for Sola or Solo Scriptura in the Bible, you can tell me. Keep in mind that in 1 Timothy, when Paul says, "All Scripture is God-breathed," he is referring to the Hebrew Bible (the Old Testament) and not the New Testament, which had yet to been written. In other "proofs," the greatness and power and authority of God's Word is established, but not the self-sufficiency of the written Word of God throughout. God bless.
@seanpermann5570
4 ай бұрын
@@Nose77904the words are not there but the formula for the triune Godhead is. If you can't figure that much out I'd suggest reading it more than letting it collect dust on your dresser.
@seanpermann5570
4 ай бұрын
@@Nose77904sola scriptural means basically that scripture breathed out by God is infallible and everything must be weighed against it for truth because every person is infallible. Just because a priest or pastor teaches you something doesn't mean it's truth. You should know scripture just as much as the one teaching you.
@beadoll8025
3 ай бұрын
So do you deny the Scriptures as being the word of God? It is the word of God so it should be the highest authority because it God's Word. Why would faulty man's traditions be on par with Scripture? So, who knows best fallible man or GOD? This should be evident if you are honest with yourself if you think man's word or tradition supercedes God's word then it's clear that you don't want to do what God tells you to do and you're a LOST person.
@floogelhornzzz4770
6 ай бұрын
Hey, can you fix the spelling of Heresy in the title? It's not "Hersey."
@hailholyqueen
3 ай бұрын
Mmmmmm...... Chocolate.
@nosuchthing8
2 ай бұрын
Yeah, that bothers me too
@timmoore9736
2 ай бұрын
:The herey of the Catholic Mass - that is hysterical. The Mass is not a re-sacrificing of Christ; it It perpetuates His one sacrifice that stands outside of time. God cannot be killed and when His humanity died in the Person of Jesus Christ on Good Friday such an event must break through the confines of time if God is truly eternal and infinite. Perhaps the pastor whoudl review John 6, Luke 22, 14-20 and Luke 24, 13 - 31, as well as all the early Christian writers. Even Kuther accepted the Mass.
@jediv9910
Ай бұрын
@ianmonk6211 *You are making false claims again sda ct member. Where in Heb 8,10 ever said "since Jesus is the Lord of Sabbath, Gentile Christians need to keep 7th day sabbath as a law" or "keeping sabbath day as a law is worshipping Jesus?"? WHere?* you said Jesus says he is Lord of the Sabbath. So if you're not observing the Sabbath your not worshipping the Lord of it.
@hamidrabiipour9707
3 ай бұрын
You may want to look up Dr John Bergsma, who after many years of research decided to leave Calvinism, his church, salary & some friends and joined the Catholic Church. He explains the reason in plain language so you can understand. Do it for your own scrutiny and spiritual development.
@BenShapiroBR
2 ай бұрын
The envy of the protestants over the true and real cult of Jesus, to be able to be fed with his body, blood, soul and divinity, full real objective communion, is overwhelming. This truth is the real difference between the real Church and the pseudochurches. Hebrews describes the Mass.
@MrProsat
Ай бұрын
Jesus continues to intercede for us at the Altar in Heaven as the High Priest, an ongoing propitiation. Yes, it is all in Hebrews.
@BenShapiroBR
Ай бұрын
@@MrProsat exactly. The Mass on Earth as the Mass in Heavens. As He said: "do this in rememberance of me", and the priests did so as in 1Cor, 24-26. It is só divide that whoever eats His Body without legitimacy is doomed.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *You are still dodging ... Bible says clergy priesthood, altars and sacrifices were already obsolete. Heb 7,9,10. So why would there be a clergy priesthood in nt Church? nt Church of the Bible did not have clergy priesthood. So where did Roman pagan priesthood and Roman pagan altars come from?* Heb 7:27 who does not need daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the people's, for this He did once for all when He offered up Himself. Heb 9:12 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Most Holy Place once for all, having obtained eternal redemption. Heb 10:10 By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. Heb 10:11 And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. Heb 10:12 But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, Heb 10:18 Now where there is remission of these, there is *no longer an offering for sin* .
@richardnewquist6469
2 ай бұрын
Maybe it’s time to fix the spelling error in the title of the video?
@lewing658
11 ай бұрын
So which church is the right church to go to. They all believe and interpret differently.
@doriesse824
6 ай бұрын
First of all, stay away from any church that is 501c3 tax exempt. They trade being tax-free for any freedom to speak out against very important subjects like they once could.
@TimeWillTell651
5 ай бұрын
Pray and ask God yourself. Keep seeking hard in prayer and ask God to reveal himself to you and tell you what the truth is. I promise you you won’t get led to romantic Catholicism or any religion but to just the person of Jesus Christ. See for yourself.
@lewing658
5 ай бұрын
@@TimeWillTell651 that was a rhetorical question. I have already found the truth.
@carlocosta3751
2 ай бұрын
You can seek and you will find when you aeek truth with all your heart. I came out of Romanism looking for truth because I believe God was working in my life to save me by revealing the truth and power of the gospel ( good news) to me which I found in the Word.
@majorcajun5524
2 ай бұрын
@@lewing658 which is what?
@user-uc1yb7hy2n
7 ай бұрын
Justin Martyr vs John MacArthur. The Apostle John’s students, Ignatius and Πολύκαρπος Early Christianity would not even recognize MacArthur’s version of Christianity. Πάντοτε Χαίρετε.
@johnmark6628
4 ай бұрын
Wrong. I've read the writings of those people. . They would not recognize catholicism. . Catholics always like to point to these people to try to prove their ridiculous misunderstandings of scripture. . The only problem is that if you ever read the writings of these people they absolutely do not agree in any stretch of the imagination whatsoever to catholicism.
@MrProsat
Ай бұрын
MacArthur is a millionaire by preaching false witness. Too bad so many people are gullible.
@scrpnby4207
9 күн бұрын
I’m sorry you think that. John MacArthur holds to the truth of scripture and no other “truth” ever overrides it. If ANY Christian preaches or promotes something that is not from the truth of scripture then what they have said should be dismissed.
@user-uc1yb7hy2n
9 күн бұрын
John MacArthur specifically denied Peter was in or had anything to do with Rome. Scripture proves him wrong. ( Peter wrote through Sylvanus from Rome)
@MrProsat
9 күн бұрын
@@user-uc1yb7hy2n John MacArthur knows little about history or about Catholicism.
@jediv9910
Ай бұрын
@bridgefin *Bible does not mention Roman Catholic or Catholic. Neither saved by submitting to Roman pagan popes or being in Roman pagan religion or devoting to Roman pagan Mary. Neither baptising in Roman pagan baptism conducted by Roman pagan priesthood. So what ns journey are you referring to?* you said Any Catholic who is saved started that Journey with the same spirit and water as Jesus mentioned in John 3.
@billpletikapich5640
3 ай бұрын
A lot of time spent bashing Catholic and Protestant but what is the true Gospel? What makes MacArthur think he knows more than other Protestants?
@MrProsat
3 ай бұрын
He has to pay off that Camaro somehow...
@dodavega
2 ай бұрын
Go to 1 cor ch 1 for the gospel that saves Our faith is very simple
@gluvsd1029
Ай бұрын
The bs this knucklehead is spouting.. probably brought a stripper to his congregation... Another ignorant Protestant or whatever they call themselves 🤮🖕🏽
@jesusvergara3749
Жыл бұрын
8th commandment "Thou shalt not bear false witness against your neighbor. The RCC is founded by Christ. Read this Acts 5:38-39 So in the present case, I tell you, keep away from these men and let them alone, because if this plan or this undertaking is of human origin, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them-in that case you may even be found fighting against God
@josephdalelio6684
8 ай бұрын
::
@TimeWillTell651
5 ай бұрын
It’s funny you mentioned this text to try to push your belief about the RCC, because if you read from the top of this chapter of Acts 5 to the very end, you would’ve seen (or perhaps you did and ignored it) that it was the Gospel that was being preached by the Apostles. As seen in verse 42. They were telling people about Jesus, not any tradition. They were telling people to place their faith in Jesus, because he was put to death for our sins and resurrected in 3 days, paying our debt. Go to the next chapter, Acts 6, and read 14. If Jesus changed the covenant from the old, which was about law keeping and only directed to Jews, to the new covenant, which is all about faith alone in Jesus alone, which causes him to enter your body (which happened to me), why then do Catholics believe their traditions must be kept? If the law of Moses doesn’t have to be kept, why would man made traditions be kept? Heck let’s go back to Acts 4. Where it says salvation is found only in the name of Jesus. It’s clearly stated that the faith is to be placed upon Jesus, alone, for the salvation of sinners/the forgiveness of their sins. That contradicts Roman Catholicism, which states faith plus this that and other is how one is saved and even then doesn’t even promise eternal life. I love how you tried to use a text that clearly spoke about the apostles preaching the Gospel to push your Roman Catholic agenda to spread a false religion, when in that same chapter 5, you’re very clearly exposed when it states the apostles were proclaiming the good news about Jesus Christ. Good news being what Gospel means, and it talking about sin being completely dealt with by the death burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and the faith placed upon him being all that’s needed for our sin to be fully forgiven and taken away, and for his righteousness to be imputed to us. It’s very amusing how dishonest and shady you Catholics are, that y’all have to lie and twist to convince people to join an organization that doesn’t even grant them a relationship with the Almighty and eternal life. Goes to show that you’re truly just following satan. 2 Corinthians 4:3-4.
@barbwellman6686
21 күн бұрын
Correct me if I'm wrong. Did Calvin's gospel preach and teach that God predestines some souls to damnation irregardless of their willingness to reach out to God?
@markevans8054
2 күн бұрын
Read the Bible. Ephesians ch 1 verse 11. In him we were also chosen having been "predestined" according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will.....Yes God predestines some and not others. You can argue about that with God when you get a moment.
@barbwellman6686
Күн бұрын
@markevans8054 1 Tim 2 1First of all, then, I urge that petitions, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgiving be offered for everyone- for kings and all those in authority-so that we may lead tranquil and quiet lives in all godliness and dignity. >>>>>This is good and pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, who wants everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@nathanoppy *Hilarious false claims. There were so many churches that were not Roman religion or Orthos in history. Ethiopian Churches, Egyptian churches, Armenian churches, ASsyrian churches and many more.* you said Catholic Church was the only church for 1500 years until the reformation?
@timothyjordan5731
4 ай бұрын
How many times did the LORD GOD lead the Chosen People out of Egypt? Once? Then why do they commemorate it every year (Jesus included) as though they were/are at the actual event?
@kd5499
3 ай бұрын
They commemorate it because God commanded it a holy day. He did not command us to sacrifice Jesus everyday. We can do a commemorative Lord's supper, but Jesus himself is not coming back daily to be an unblooded sacrifice on another altar
@MrProsat
3 ай бұрын
@@kd5499 Jesus isn't sacrificed every day. If you have a problem with the Catholic Mass, have the decency to at least understand what you disagree with. It's tiring watching these straw man arguments.
@jpcrotc
2 ай бұрын
@@MrProsat The Council of Trent wrote that during Mass that "Christ is contained and immolated." Immolation is a sacrificial killing.
@MrProsat
2 ай бұрын
@@jpcrotc Look at the context. It states several times that Christ is not killed again, sacrificed again. His sacrifice is re-presented to us. We are drawn into it, despite being removed by 2000 years. Jesus, according to Hebrews and Romans INTERCEDES - present tense - for us. The heavenly scene of worship in Revelation also shows the Lamb that appears slain offering Himself for the sake of humanity. Immolation has multiple meanings, if you read the context, it should be clear what Trent says.
@MultiSky7
2 ай бұрын
@@MrProsat Context?? Really?? Read Council of Trent, session 22. Chapter 2. Towards the end they even confirm that there is no difference between Jesus's sacrifice than and priest's sacrifice during the mass - less the blood.
@sebastian.v2
Жыл бұрын
Didn't Jesus teach not to judge, and to instead focus on doing what is right, and live by the rules of the kingdom? The final judgement is up to God and God alone. Didn't Jesus also rebuke his disciples for rebuking others doing good works in the name of Jesus? It's sad to see so much energy that is put into analysing the beliefs, rituals, and practices of other churches that follow Christ, when we should be focussing on living like Christ as much as possible every single day of our lives - inside and outside of church. Even if another church does have bad practices, why should we not work alongside them in pursuit of the kingdom, instead of scoffing at them? The parable of the weeds: --- Jesus told them another parable: “The kingdom of heaven is like a man who sowed good seed in his field. But while everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away. When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, then the weeds also appeared. “The owner’s servants came to him and said, ‘Sir, didn’t you sow good seed in your field? Where then did the weeds come from?’ “‘An enemy did this,’ he replied. “The servants asked him, ‘Do you want us to go and pull them up?’ “‘No,’ he answered, ‘because while you are pulling the weeds, you may uproot the wheat with them. Let both grow together until the harvest. At that time I will tell the harvesters: First collect the weeds and tie them in bundles to be burned; then gather the wheat and bring it into my barn.’” --- Matthew 13:24
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc
Жыл бұрын
The Gospel Truth is (supposed to be) the foundation for every Christ follower. JESUS Warned about “Leaven of the Pharisees” etc Absolute Truth vs Relativism.
@1234poppycat
Жыл бұрын
Mr MacArthur can not be a servant of Jesus He is completely tragic as he thinks success is lies in bringing people away from Gods Catholic Church. In another hate video he says Catholics worship Mary ! At 5 minutes he misrepresents the Catholic Mass ONCE Part of the Eucharistic prayer is "as we join in this one perfect sacrifice"" He ignores 14 scripture start with John 6 The Mass is a requirement insisted by Jesus -- this is why he will never enter into a debate with any Catholic priest or Catholic clergy -- it is so easy to show up MacArthur lies I say again Catholic Mass is joining in the ONE sacrifice btw the priesthood is because of the growth of the Church they are lesser Bishops which we have in the New Testament Mr MacArthur is a false preacher offering false claims as he leads a false church !!
@user-kj2fz5lq7g
Ай бұрын
This person goes on and on . Bears false witness and slanders the Catholic Church . Commandment 9 . This man is a stalker of the Catholic Church . He is so sad . He won’t have a talk with a priest or a Catholic apologist. He is a false preacher . God Doesn’t like this . This man is full of hate .
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *WHere in the Bible ever said "Jesus' work is not completely done because there is an altar in heaven"?* *Where has Jesus interceding for believers to do with altars in heaven? Since when Bible says Jesus was sacrifice on the altar in heaven? Answer these. You are concocting tales all days.* you said Now, if "Jesus work is completely done", why is there an altar in heaven? WHY is Jesus STILL interceding for us? Can you answer that?
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *Cite me one Apostle or NT believer who "sacrificed Jesus on the altar back to God". Where?* 1 2 3
@jeffodonnell7098
2 ай бұрын
Just curious, At what point in the digestive process is the host considered no longer Jesus under the Catholic system?
@andreaurelius45
2 ай бұрын
The Eucharist is a Spiritual thing. Your post modernist categories do not have boxes for that. ....you don't even believe in Spiritual Authority
@carolinajackson7621
2 ай бұрын
I also asked that to a Roman catholic, telling him that transubstantiation means u r sending particles of Jesus to the sewer.
@andreaurelius45
2 ай бұрын
@@carolinajackson7621 did you read what Jesus said about communion? And did tou read about what Jesus said about what is not possible with man is possible with GOD?
@carolinajackson7621
2 ай бұрын
@andreaurelius45 1. Yes, I have read what Jesus said about communion, & has nothing to do with the sacrifice part of the Mass. 2. The context of those words by Jesus was about rich pple having trouble following God. U cannot use those words of Jesus as a panacea for wrong doctrine. Greetings.
@andreaurelius45
2 ай бұрын
@@carolinajackson7621 nope you are wrong. The Eucharist is the CENTERPIECE of Christian Worship for over 20 Centuries. It has ALWAYS carried Spiritual significance. It has ALWAYS imparted Spiritual effects to the partakers of it IF correct Authority and Succession are present.
@jediv3381
5 ай бұрын
@1234poppycat *You failed to answer again.* *WHere in your 14 verses says anything about Roman Mass (sacrificing Jesus on the altar back to God) or Roman Transubstantiation (elements transformed into Jesus to be eaten by Roman Catholics)? Where?*
@jaynelyone687
2 ай бұрын
You can’t find it in the Bible but you can find the practice of transubstansiation in any pagan books. Read the two Babylons, or any witchcraft book, or anything on Tower of Babel
@MrProsat
2 ай бұрын
Another lazy straw man argument. Catholics do not say that Jesus is sacrificed on the altar again and again. He is represented to the Father to make a continuous intercession for our sake. Romans, Hebrews and Revelation all speak of Jesus interceding NOW. And in Revelation, that is heavenly liturgy that the Catholic Mass is joined to. Do this in remembrance of me. Do what? What does Jesus say to "do this"? I presume you can find that answer in the Synoptic Gospels.
@debbednarczyk5838
2 ай бұрын
@@MrProsatHe can and does that seated at the right hand of the Father, where He continually intercedes for us
@MrProsat
2 ай бұрын
@@debbednarczyk5838 Jesus High Priest role continues. He offers Himself - "Look Father, what I have done for Debbednarczyk. Forgive her of her sins". We can participate in that action in the worship that takes place simultaneously in heaven and at the Mass - the perfect offering given to the Father at all times everywhere.
@jediv3381
2 ай бұрын
@@MrProsat *Bible says clergy priesthood, altar and sacrifice was already obsolete, Heb 7,9,10. So where did Roman pagan priesthood and altars come from?* *WHere in the Bible ever said there is such thing as a Roman pagan Mass (sacrifice Jesus on the altar back to God)? If you can find that i will give you a lollipop.* you said Another lazy straw man argument. Catholics do not say that Jesus is sacrificed on the altar again and again.
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *If Jesus' work was not completely done, why did He say "it is finished"? WHy? Answer coherently intelligently.* you said Now, if "Jesus work is completely done",
@billmartinn9851
8 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, MacArthur also preaches heresy, in teaching that the TULIP of reformed theology is biblically correct. Christ died for ALL, 1John 2:2. But not all will accept that invitation. John 1:12.
@anthonymongelli5567
5 ай бұрын
I know about it already I was raised Catholic but I am saved now forty three years since I was born again at 32 years old.! I didn’t know what I was missing till I lost everything and had been very successful up to that point.! Worthy is the LAMB 🐑 of Our FATHER Hallelujah and AMEN.
@THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE.
5 ай бұрын
You have to be Baptized with water and The Spirit to be born again. Being born again isn't what one sole individual personally interprets it to be. This is just being delusional. Even The Bible doesn't say this anywhere. If you were Baptized Catholic then you were already born again. And if you haven't been denounced by a Catholic Bishop then you are still a Catholic. It's good that you came back to God, but don't let ignorant men like John MacArthur fool you into believing lies about The Catholic faith.
@donaldcooley897
4 ай бұрын
@@THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE. What John says is biblical . and what you say about catholics being born again is not biblical . sprinkling water on the head of a baby or any one else is not being born again . and according to scriptures you must hear the word , faith come by hearing the word of God .Romans 10 : 17 No one comes to God unless it is by Jesus .John 14 : 6 .and no one comes to Christ unless God calls them John 6 : 44 ; I am 91 years old , was saved at 16 ,75 years ago when I heard the gospel in a revival , when I was 13 in a Methodist Church it was 6 or more teen agers went to class for a week and on Sunday we went to the front of the Church and was sprinkled on the head with water and become Christians . I didn`t feel any different and i didn`t see things in life any different , Then at the age of 16 I went to a revival and the Holy spirit revealed to me that I was a sinner and I was brought to Christ for salvation , I repented of my sin and excepted Christ as my Lord and savior , I felt relieved and good and I knew something had changed , I saw things different , and I thought about thing different . I had become born again from above , I was born spiritually dead in sins and when by faith believed on Christ I was saved , and I was baptized by the spirit into the body of Christ 1 Cor. 12 : 13 , and a man who is in Christ is a New Creature ( Creation ) 2 Cor. 5 : 17 born from above born of God , that is what being born again is about . 1 John 3 : 9 ; 1 John 5 : 18 ; when in my 20s I was called to be an Evangelist and after school I was ordained and preached and taught on Radio and in Churches in the south , that has been some 50+ years ago and the word of God has not changed there is only one way of salvation and that is through faith believing on Christ Prove me wrong by scriptures . ARE YOU SAVED ?
@THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE.
4 ай бұрын
@@donaldcooley897 I'm sorry my friend, but you need to learn The Scriptures more. What I stated about being born again has nothing to do with Catholicism, but actually comes right from The Bible as Jesus has spoken them. So unfortunately my friend I will not read the rest of your comment, because you are unfortunately communicating from a view point of Catholic bias instead from a *true* Biblical stand point.
@donaldcooley897
4 ай бұрын
@@THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE. You are the one that brought up catholic . I am commenting that being springled with water does not make you born again . catholic , Methodist , or any other religion . A professor ask on a test why must you be born again ? How do you get born again and what happens to you when you get born again . Do you know? when you are born the first time , you are born in water in the flesh , spiritually dead . Separated from God . Flesh and blood can not inter the Kingdom of Heaven . 1 Cor. 15 : 50 ;the only way to regenerate or quicken or make alive the dead spiritual man is by the spirit . that quicken or makes alive. John 6 : 63 ; Eph. 2 : 5 ; John 3 : 3- 10 ; explains it very simple , To be born again is by the spirit not by water . when a sinner hears the word the spirit convicts him he is a sinner and he repents and is drawn to Christ for forgiveness of sins and by faith believing on Christ he is saved . When a sinner get saved he is baptized by the spirit into the body of Christ 1 Cor. 12 :13 ; and when a man is in Christ he is a New Creature ( creation ) born of God from above . 2 Cor. 5 : 17 ; Read !!! ; That is what being born again is about . 1 John 3: 1 - 9 ; 1 John 5 : 18 . Your problem is you do not want to hear the spiritual truth of God word . So being born again is by the spirit .nothing else . It is the only way for to be made alive spiritually is by quickening or baptism of the spirit I know I can always learn more about the inspired word of God . but what I do know is I am saved ,by faith believing on Christ and his Gospel and born again , by the baptism of the Holy spirit , and that is am a Son of God born born by the spirit . I am a member of the Church the body of Christ his Church the one he prophesied he would build on him self , so that makes me a member of his body which is his Church it is the one he died for , it is holy with out spot or blemish . Eph. 5 : 25 - 27 ; it is his bride , it is the Church of the living God ,the Pillar and Ground of the truth . all saved believers are members , we are also saints living or dead . and we worship God in spirit and in truth in local denominations that preach and teach the Gospel of Christ for the salvation of sinners . ARE YOU SAVED ?
@THE-WAY_THE-TRUTH_THE-LIFE.
4 ай бұрын
@@donaldcooley897 Sorry my friend, but your argument is not with me here, but with Scripture itself. I stated what Jesus Himself said in The Bible about being born again: "Very truly I tell you, no one can see The Kingdom of God unless they are born again." John 3:3 We already know by Jesus words that being born again means to be born of water and The Spirit. John 3:5 This is what Baptism is. So you are saying that Christ Himself is wrong? You have to be Baptized to be born again, and there is only one Baptism no matter what denomination you are from. You can't be born born again after you already were born again. There is only one born again. Just like human birth. You can't be born from the womb twice, and you can't be Baptized twice cause it makes no sense. People who are Baptized more than once are only doing it for themselves, and people who say they're "born again" without a Baptism are just making things up. If OP was Baptized as Catholic, then they are a Catholic for life, unless they were denounced from Catholicism by their Bishop or The Holy Father. OP saying "I felt born again at 32 and rejected Catholicism, so now I'm a born again non-Catholic" doesn't actually make it so. This is just deception and delusion. Empty words with no real meaning. That's why it's important to not only quote Scripture, but also to understand it and live it. If being a born again Christian was just about people only saying that they were born again whenever they *felt* like they were, then there would be no need for Baptism, and Jesus words would be wrong. THAT is my point. I made TWO different points in my comment my friend, but it seems that you just read the word "Catholic" and then go on an unlogical tirade because of an ignorant bias you seem to have for Catholicism. (Same thing with MacArthur.) To be honest I didn't even read most of your last comment either because of your tirade. You don't understand what I'm saying, mix up denominations as being an entire Religion, and then have the blatant ordasity to question someone else's Salvation. You need to get right my friend. Since you are very wrong I could ask You if "YOU ARE SAVED?", but I'm not going to, because that's just dumb. Actions speak louder than words my friend. You know how to quote Scripture with your words, but you don't seem to live it in a Christ like manner with your heart. Maybe you should get off of social media for a bit and re-examine yourself to see how you can be more Christ like. Pray to The father to turn your heart from stone to flesh. I hope that it works out for you my friend. God Bless
@brianwinters5434
Жыл бұрын
Sad but true.
@jediv9910
Ай бұрын
@ianmonk6211 *Sure .. where in John 14, 15 or 1John 5 ever said "GEntile Christians need to keep 7th sabbath as a law"? Where?* you said John 14:15-21 He said He kept His father's commandments john 15:10. 1 john 2:3-4 Paul tells us to imitate him as he imitates Christ Jesus sets the Sabbath observance example in Luke 4:16 and Paul in Acts 17:2. 1Jn 5: v2. By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *You claimed there were Christian altars in NT. So what altars were they? OT had two different altars - the Altar of Burnt Offering, and the Altar of Incense. So which altar was NT or Roman pagan religion using?* *Cite me Scriptures of Apostles using them. Where?* 1 2 3
@billpletikapich5640
6 күн бұрын
All I know is: if no altar, how does one dance down the aisle and do an altar call? That is what they are for ?
@jediv9492
5 күн бұрын
@@billpletikapich5640 *You do not sound intelligent. Altar call is just a term that meant a call for response. Not saying there is an altar.*
@billpletikapich5640
5 күн бұрын
@@jediv9492 Thank you. Why would I respond to an Altar. Wouldn't one respond to Jesus Christ or if one chooses an inanimate object, a cross? Whenever I see an Altar call it reminds me of Soul train, with people dancing down the aisle, That's the response That I see. Where is your interpretation in the Bible ? Chapter and Vs.? 1, 2, 3
@jediv9492
5 күн бұрын
@@billpletikapich5640 *You do not sound coherent. TRy again.* *Altar calls are just time to respond to God. Jesus called for response often. Who says altar calls = dancing at the aisle? You do not sound intelligent.* you said Thank you. Why would I respond to an Altar. Wouldn't one respond to Jesus Christ or if one chooses an inanimate object, a cross? Whenever I see an Altar call it reminds me of Soul train, with people dancing down the aisle, That's the response That I see. Where is your interpretation in the Bible ? Chapter and Vs.? 1, 2, 3
@jediv9492
5 күн бұрын
@@billpletikapich5640 *Where in the Bible teaches Roman pagan Mass (sacrificing Jesus on the altar back to God"? Where is your interpretation in the Bible ? Chapter and Vs.? 1, 2, 3?*
@lilybeth8767
4 ай бұрын
I pray for this speaker, he spreads division and hate rather than love towards his brothers and sisters in Christ. God bless us all.
@MrProsat
Ай бұрын
Follow the money, friend. Follow the money.... The guy is rich for a reason.
@jpwpropertycare.drivewaysa285
Жыл бұрын
I thank God for Pastor John I am in Irish Catholic, and to be honest I didn’t know half of that because he’s right. We are only spectators at praise the Lord and glory in our Jesus, amen
@geordiewishart1683
Жыл бұрын
Have you ever been able to see any videos by ex Irish priest Richard Bennett?
@1234poppycat
Жыл бұрын
@@geordiewishart1683 Richard Bennett has a murky past have you researched that ??
@1234poppycat
Жыл бұрын
You need to go to Mass on a regular basis and if you have doubts discuss them with a priest rather than be fooled by the hate preachers who lie about Catholicism (which you should know about if you were a practicing Catholic
@sethyap8268
11 ай бұрын
you should do more research about the Catholic faith. try to listen scott hahn or steve ray.
@hamidrabiipour9707
10 ай бұрын
Hey jpw... Pastor John is a misguided Calvinist. You would be in mountains of trouble if MacArthur is your spiritual leader. Do some research bro, watch professor Douglas Beaumont or John Bergsma. They will certainly help with your knowledge on Catholic faith.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *Sola Scriptura remain unchallenged:* *180+ verses showed Jesus, APostles and NT CHurch took doctrines from Scriptures Only. This is already Sola Scriptura. Roman pagans say no.* *Bible says Do Not Go Beyond Scriptures and Man shall live by every Word of God. 1 Cor 4:6, Mat 4:4. This is already Sola Scriptura. Roman pagans say no.* *So many early writings mentioned the Exact Words "Scripture Alone". This is already Sola Scriptura. Roman pagans say no.*
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *You are still dodging... WHere in the Bible ever said anything about Roman Mass (sacrificing Jesus on the altar back to God) or Roman Transubstantiation (elements transformed into Jesus to be eaten by Roman Catholics)? Where?*
@user-ny3sy2mk7q
9 ай бұрын
If I weren’t Catholic, I would look for the Church most despised by the WORLD! There is the true Church of Jesus Christ, the one, holy, catholic, apostolic Church! The one who is treated just like Jesus himself! Glory to God in the highest! Blessed be the one who comes in the name of the Lord! Jesus is the ONE mediator between us and God! Mediator of the New and everlasting CONVENTANT! Not to be confused with intercessor, we are all intercessors, praying for one another!
@andrejshamonky2863
8 ай бұрын
I mean, you have to at least give 1 valid argument for your case. You offered no refutal of arguments from the video. If you want the most HATED church - wouldn't it be Jehovass Witnesses? That is not how it works... God bless brother! 🙏
@lestie1686
7 ай бұрын
Please check out message from heaven by Rachel lubbe and A lamp in the dark by chist pinto and Before the wrath by ingenuity films.
@grossepointemichigan
5 ай бұрын
@@andrejshamonky2863 Johnny boy the preacher man teaches heresy, so there's that...
@taylord9190
2 ай бұрын
@@andrejshamonky2863Think it should be the Mormons/LDS tbh. They have way too many murders and abuses going on over there. Might as well be sacrificing to Molech for all the faith and fruit they (don't) produce. Their depravity is off the charts. JW are weird. Mormons are dangerous 😮
@elizabethburns1449
Ай бұрын
The world loves Catholicism? Kings and queens bow before the beast. Even presidents. The pope is king of this world and God told us he gets his power from satan. You want to talk about a hated church? Christians. Christians were killed by the Roman Catholics for hundreds of years. Look up what your church did to its own people in 1994 in rawanda. Appalling stuff. Evil stuff.
@ateam388
8 ай бұрын
The church father Saint Ignatius who was taught by the Apostle John said this in 107AD: See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is administered either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude of the people also be; even as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. -Letter to the Smyrnaeans, Ch 8
@jayman762
7 ай бұрын
And Judas was taught by Jesus, so your point is misguided. Men still find a way to taint and twist God’s gift. This is nothing new. There is no authority above God’s word that is found in scripture.
@ateam388
7 ай бұрын
@@jayman762 Sadly so many people struggle with Trusting in Our Lord Jesus Christ. When Jesus said if you do not eat my body and drink my blood you do not have eternal life then seventy disciples left because they did not believe Jesus. He was then left with just the twelve. Jesus at the last supper Instituted the Eucharist and that is when Judas leaves to betray Our Lord because Judas did not believe.
@TruthHasSpoken
5 ай бұрын
@@jayman762 St Ignatius is a a great example of (Luke 10): He (St Ignatius) Who hears you (St John) Hears me (Jesus) "Men still find a way to taint and twist God’s gift." 100% agree. I'll go with Luke 10 on this one.
@rd77513
29 күн бұрын
@@jayman762 10-15 years after the last apostle dies, based on Saint Ignatius you would be a heretic and removed from the church for your beliefs.
@radioranchito4465
3 ай бұрын
The Roman Mass is by definition a replacement by Divine Love of the pagan sacrifices offered in the early days of human existence. Instead of you offering your own babies to the Evil One, common in pagan practices, God came to sacrifice his own Son to replace the before, this sacrifice is known as the Mass.
@jediv9910
Ай бұрын
@ianmonk6211 *I am not an RC. You are making false claims of SDA ct. Where in the Bible ever said "Gentile Christians need to keep 7th day Sabbath as a law"? Cite me some verses that say so?* 1 2 3 *NOTE: please do not cite me verses that mentioned Sabbath but has nothing to do with Gentile Christians or Gentile Christians keeping sabbath as a law".* you said All Sunday keepers break the 4th commandment. They are either Catholic or daughters of the Catholic church.
@MrProsat
Ай бұрын
Ah, SDA, that explains a lot of your biblical ignorance.
@jediv3381
5 ай бұрын
@1234poppycat *Bible does not teach you can get "help" from "passed on believers" to be saved. Simple faith is sufficient for salvation. John 3:16. Roman Catholics are still working for salvation.* you said we get help and support from the prayers of others including saints and Mary -- Only Jesus saves you !
@MrProsat
Ай бұрын
Where is that verse - simple faith alone saves...? Yes, Catholics work out their salvation in fear and trembling - well, you can find the rest of that verse... You probably never read it, so I better help, it is Phil 2.
@1234poppycat
8 ай бұрын
Explaining the heresy of Mr John MacArthur.... His points on the Eucharist The easiest and first to refute is that he says Jesus made ONECE and for all sacrifice .. That has been the teaching of Catholicism for 2000 years ... The Eucharist is part of the ONE sacrifice Jesus so in the Eucharistic prayer we hear "as we join in this ONE living and perfect sacrifice....." Then we come to his scripture claims.......John 6:30 begins in the synagogue at Capernaum. The Jews asked Jesus what sign he could perform so that they might believe in him. As a challenge, they noted that “our ancestors ate manna in the desert.” Could Jesus top that? He told them the real bread from heaven comes from the Father. “Give us this bread always,” they said. Jesus replied, “I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me will never hunger, and whoever believes in me will never thirst.” At this point the Jews understood him to be speaking metaphorically. Jesus first repeated what he said, then summarized: “‘I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if any one eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh.’ The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, ‘How can this man give us his flesh to eat?’” (John 6:51-52). His listeners were stupefied because now they understood Jesus literally-and correctly. He again repeated his words, but with even greater emphasis, and introduced the statement about drinking his blood: “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him” (John 6:53-56). Notice that Jesus made no attempt to soften what he said, no attempt to correct “misunderstandings,” for there were none. Our Lord’s listeners understood him perfectly well. They no longer thought he was speaking metaphorically. In John 6:60 we read: “Many of his disciples, when they heard it, said, ‘This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?’” (It is here, in the rejection of the Eucharist, that Judas fell away; look at John 6:64.) “After this, many of his disciples drew back and no longer went about with him” (John 6:66). This is the only record we have of any of Christ’s followers forsaking him for purely doctrinal reasons. If they erred in taking a metaphor in a literal sense, why didn’t he call them back and straighten things out? Both the Jews, who were suspicious of him, and his disciples, who had accepted everything up to this point, would have remained with him had he said he was speaking only symbolically. But he did not correct these protesters. Twelve times he said he was the bread that came down from heaven; four times he said they would have “to eat my flesh and drink my blood.” John 6 was an extended promise of what would be instituted at the Last Supper-and it was a promise that could not be more explicit. Now when you say Christ was speaking only metaphorically by comparing verses like John 10:9 (“I am the door”) and John 15:1 (“I am the true vine”). The problem is that there is not a connection to John 6:35, “I am the bread of life.” “I am the door” and “I am the vine” make sense as metaphors because Christ is like a door-we go to heaven through him-and he is also like a vine-we get our spiritual sap through him. But Christ takes John 6:35 far beyond symbolism by saying, “For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed” (John 6:55). Jesus continues: “As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me” (John 6:57). The Greek word used for “eats” (trogon) is very blunt and has the sense of “chewing” or “gnawing.” This is not the language of metaphor. You appeal to John 6:63: “It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.” You say this means that eating real flesh is a waste. But does this make sense? Are we to understand that Christ had just commanded his disciples to eat his flesh, then said their doing so would be pointless? Is that what “the flesh is of no avail” means? “Eat my flesh, but you’ll find it’s a waste of time”-is that what he was saying? Hardly. In John 6:63 “flesh profits nothing” refers to mankind’s inclination to think using only what their natural human reason would tell them rather than what God would tell them. Thus in John 8:15-16 Jesus tells his opponents: “You judge according to the flesh, I judge no one. Yet even if I do judge, my judgment is true, for it is not I alone that judge, but I and he who sent me.” So natural human judgment, unaided by God’s grace, is unreliable; but God’s judgment is always true. Also in John 6:63, “The words I have spoken to you are spirit” does not mean “What I have just said is symbolic.” The word “spirit” is never used that way in the Bible. The line means that what Christ has said will be understood only through faith; only by the power of the Spirit and the drawing of the Father (cf. John 6:37, 44-45, 65). Paul wrote to the Corinthians: “The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?” (1 Cor. 10:16). So when we receive Communion, we actually participate in the body and blood of Christ, not just eat symbols of them. Paul also said, “Therefore whoever eats the bread and drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have to answer for the body and blood of the Lord. . . . For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment on himself” (1 Cor. 11:27, 29). “To answer for the body and blood” of someone meant to be guilty of a crime as serious as homicide. How could eating mere bread and wine “unworthily” be so serious? Paul’s comment makes sense only if the bread and wine became the real body and blood of Christ. Anti-Catholics also claim the early Church took this chapter symbolically. Ignatius of Antioch, who had been a disciple of the apostle John and who wrote a letter to the Smyrnaeans about A.D. 110, said, referring to “those who hold heterodox opinions,” that “they abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in his goodness, raised up again” (6:2, 7:1). Forty years later, Justin Martyr, wrote, “Not as common bread or common drink do we receive these; but since Jesus Christ our Savior was made incarnate by the word of God and had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so too, as we have been taught, the food which has been made into the Eucharist by the Eucharistic prayer set down by him, and by the change of which our blood and flesh is nourished, . . . is both the flesh and the blood of that incarnated Jesus” (First Apology 66:1-20). Origen, in a homily written about A.D. 244, attested to belief in the Real Presence. “You are accustomed to take part in the divine mysteries, so you know how, when you have received the Body of the Lord, you reverently exercise every care lest a particle of it fall and lest anything of the consecrated gift perish” (Homilies on Exodus 13:3). Cyril of Jerusalem, in a catechetical lecture presented in the mid-300s, said, “Do not, therefore, regard the bread and wine as simply that, for they are, according to the Master’s declaration, the body and blood of Christ. Even though the senses suggest to you the other, let faith make you firm” (Catechetical Discourses: Mystagogic 4:22:9). It is this level of research prayer and understanding which has led three Church of England Bishops in just the last two years to give up so much power, wealth and status to join the Catholic Church to get closer to Christ..
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *You are still dodging ... You cannot seem to understand my simple questions. WHere in Mat 16 and Mat 18 ever said Roman pagan religion inherited the authority of Peter and Apostles? Where?* you said Matthew 16:19 Peter individually, Matthew 18:18 the Apostles in general.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *You claimed there was Christian altars. Then you should be able to cite some in NT where APostles or NT believers used. Where?* 1 2 3
@jrudi9241
Жыл бұрын
Universal (Catholic) church established 33A.D. When did Protestants take out books from the Bible and start their religion? How many denominations? I'm curious
@geordiewishart1683
Жыл бұрын
I'm curious as to how the infallible papacy changes its mind about eating meat on Fridays, and limbo. I see now papacy is saying there is salvation to be found in every religion. So why martyr fifty million souls?
@bridgefin
Жыл бұрын
@@geordiewishart1683 Friday was a practice and not a doctrine. Limbo was never a formal teaching. And nothing has changed about iys teaching on other religions.
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc
Жыл бұрын
Francis kissed the Koran & called Muslims brothers. Francis told a young boy that his atheist father is in heaven. Francis ignored reports from VIGANO. There’s more about just this one. RCs don’t know their own history
@bridgefin
Жыл бұрын
@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc We know our history and we know truth from deception. Francis was no different that Paul when he went into their pagan temple to an "unknown God". In evangelization you establish a rapport before you go further. Both Paul and Francis did that and neither of them compromised the truth when they did it. While I am not crazy about Francis I don't have the same issue as you do over the boy and his father. You probably think that the atheist father could not possibly be in Heaven. The Catholic Church says it is possible though we would not judge him to be there. I would have told the boy that it was possible that his dad was in Heaven.
@1234poppycat
Жыл бұрын
@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc Yes respecting other religions is not the same as agreeing and on this Earth we are all brothers and sisters ... Francis did not tell a boy his atheist father was in heaven. Catholic doctrine is that God alone makes the decision on the day of Judgement and no one can say about another with any certainty ....... Mr macArthur is completely tragic as he thinks success is lies in bringing people away from Gods Catholic Church. In another hate video he says Catholics worship Mary ! At 5 minutes he misrepresents the Catholic Mass ONCE Part of the Eucharistic prayer is "as we join in this one perfect sacrifice"" He ignores 14 scripture start with John 6 The Mass is a requirement insisted by Jesus -- this is why he will never enter into a debate with any Catholic priest or Catholic clergy -- it is so easy to show up MacArthur lies I say again Catholic Mass is joining in the ONE sacrifice btw the priesthood is because of the growth of the Church they are lesser Bishops which we have in the New Testament Mr MacArthur is a false preacher offering false claims as he leads a false church !!
@TheBeachkitten
11 ай бұрын
Thus the saying “ damned if you do and damned if you don’t “
@stm5258
Ай бұрын
My heart is not crying for the wicked...that's just puffed up talk...and Mr McA you embrace the Pope like he's your best friend.
@christophergegere7288
15 күн бұрын
HEBREWS 7:22 “...so much more Jesus has become a surety of a better covenant. 23 Also there were many priests, because they were prevented by death from continuing. 24 But He, because He continues forever, has an unchangeable priesthood. 25 Therefore He is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. 😃 26 For such a High Priest was fitting for us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and has become higher than the heavens; 27 who does not need daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the people's, for this He did once for all when He offered up Himself.” 🤔😃
@sswogXXIII
4 ай бұрын
Thank you, you did a beautiful job helping me become a better Traditional Catholic 😊 God bless you.
@markevans8054
2 күн бұрын
How does a person get to heaven ?
@jediv3381
5 ай бұрын
@1234poppycat *Roman doctrines comes from gblogy. Where in the Bible teaches "getting help and support from prayers of passed on believers to be saved"?* you said we get help and support from the prayers of others including saints and Mary -- Only Jesus saves you !
@MrProsat
2 ай бұрын
Where does the Bible teach to "go and build you own church with your own doctrines because you know better"???
@jediv3381
2 ай бұрын
@@MrProsat *You are just demonstrating you DO Not read the Bible RC. Taking all the verses on Church and Churches, Church in the Bible meant "all local churches + all believers". Bible does teach making disciples of all nations. Disciples are the Church.* *Jesus, APostles and NT Church all took doctrines from Scriptures only. So yes, doctrines are from Scriptures. Where in the Bible ever said RCs can take doctrines from Roman pagan religion? Where?* you said Where does the Bible teach to "go and build you own church with your own doctrines because you know better"???
@MultiSky7
2 ай бұрын
@@MrProsat You just proved his point.
@MrProsat
2 ай бұрын
@@MultiSky7 Yea, a nice bumper sticker saying, about "ya proved my point" but where do I find that verse about building your own church?
@dentonhunt2640
22 күн бұрын
Rev 4-6 mentions the prayers of the saints Yes Jesus saves us , but 99% he uses people, Salvation comes through Mary Jesus comes to us through Mary Yes Jesus saves , but we know because of those who have preceded us. It’s like the analogy of the guy drowning asking God to save him , and God sent a guy in a boat , helicopter, etc So yeah it Jesus who provides them remedies but he does through extraordinary and ordinary ways
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *You are still dodging .. Where in Malachi ever mentioned any Roman pagan altars? Bible says clergy priesthood, altars and sacrifices were already obsolete. Heb 7,9,10. So where did Roman pagan altars and Roman pagan priesthood come from? Please answer coherently intelligently.*
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *What ns. Where in Malachi mentioned any Roman pagan altars? Bible says clergy priesthood, altars and sacrifices were already obsolete. So where did Roman pagan altars and Roman pagan priesthood come from? Please answer coherently intelligently.* you said HAHAHA! What pagan roman altars are you talking about? Have you read Malachi? Probably not.
@michaelszczys8316
Жыл бұрын
As a small catholic child in early 60s I remember going to our church on a Saturday or Sunday afternoon and spending an hour or two staring at the big fancy gold device they kept on the altar that had the ' host ' in the center. Some sort of special time, I think what John was describing. Even at five or six years old , I didn't get it.
@hamidrabiipour9707
Жыл бұрын
Well Michael, apparently & sadly there has not been much of a spiritual development in you in the past few decades. Please watch professor Douglas Beaumont for more knowledge , it will certainly help your faith journey. Peace.
@michaelszczys8316
Жыл бұрын
@@hamidrabiipour9707 I'm not sure what that it supposed to mean. It seems that even at the young age of 5 or 6 I was aware that the thing in the center of that gold structure was not ' God '. I'm taking it that you're saying if I had more ' spiritual enlightenment ' I would understand that the center of the gold structure ' really is God '. At 5 and 6 years old I had pretty good understanding of a supernatural spiritual creator God and knew He didn't live in any little gold boxes or structures. 60 years later it's still the same.
@leaderofthebunch-deadbeat7716
11 ай бұрын
That's because you were (and still are) an ignorant child, I pray that you come to realize the error of your ways
@1234poppycat
8 ай бұрын
@@michaelszczys8316 You do not believe in the Actual presence of Jesus --- do some research 3 times in John 6 Jesus says "You must eat my body and Drink my blood "" there are 14 other scripture to back this up
@tonyrussell5058
8 ай бұрын
I was sent to a Catholic School in grade school. We had to attend Mass. I never had any idea what the priests were doing in all of their ceremonies sprinkling incense everywhere, speaking in Latin, wearing fancy robes and moaning depressing chants. At 40 I got saved and the first time I attended a service in a Baptist church I felt at home with God everywhere. I was astonished at the sermon that the Pastor seemed to know everything about me. It went right to the heart. It was the Holy Spirit speaking to me through the preacher!
@jediv3381
5 ай бұрын
@1234poppycat *You failed to answer once again.* *Where in the Bible teach you need to accumulate“enough faith or works” to be saved? Where did you get that NS? Chap verse?*
@jediv9910
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *The issue is not leaving the Church. The issue is Roman pagans inventing an unbiblical definition of Church. Taking all the verses on Church and Churches in the Bible. Bible says Church refers to "all local churches + all believers". The believers are the Church.* *Since believers are the Church, how do you leave yourself - the Church?* you said Where in the Bible does it say "leave the church and make your own"????
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *You failed to answer once again ... If Sola Scriptura is false, then explain why did Jesus, Apostles and NT Church all took doctrines from Scriptures Only and not from any other source? 180+ verses say so. WHy is that so? Were they all false teachers according to Roman pagans?* you said Sola Scriptura is a man-made doctrine - it is not in the Bible - it is unbiblical !
@MrProsat
Ай бұрын
You keep saying that but provide ZERO evidence. You just making things up again?
@RaulRamirez-nx5sb
Жыл бұрын
God loves to walk with us. To understand the Mass, one has to believe that God exists outside of the boundaries of time (no past or future, just the eternal now). Yet, He chose to be bound to time when the second person of the Holy Trinity walked on earth. How about the other way around? Yes, God does allow it: during Mass the priest and the congregation journey between God's time and humanity's time. This is not any different as what John experienced in Revelations. That is why, we Catholics, can claim that in Mass we participate in the one and true sacrifice, the resurrection, and Ascension of the Lord.
@katiedid8192
Жыл бұрын
Great and clear comment.
@geordiewishart1683
Жыл бұрын
To allow God to change the times and seasons that he himself has set is dangerous. How can we take at face value anything he has said if he is changing the time line?
@katiedid8192
Жыл бұрын
Geordie. God does not exist in our understanding of time -- He always was and always will be. Forever is not measured in time. We do nothing. God is in control of everything and He is not bound by time. Our understanding is related to a timeline because we have a beginning and an end. Eternity is forever no beginning and no end.
@petermubiru3790
2 ай бұрын
Catholics who have the time for this arch heretic, listen to this; all those presumptuous assertions are heretical and just as Satan has always been, he is thru all this derailing so many to hell! Who told him that when a priest offers the Sacrifice of Holy Mm ass, that priest is the one offering the sacrifice! The term Priest means representative and at Mass, the ministerial Priest represents Christ. STOP CONFUSING THE WORLD. ALL YOU HAVE SAID IS NOT THE CHURCH TEACHES ABOUT THE HOLY MASS.
@bruceclary9238
2 жыл бұрын
Very well explained! I respect how he uses Scripture and their own false doctrines and documents to show just how blinded the Catholics are. When MacArthur continues to keep his pride aside, the truth really flows from the Holy Spirit to show who and what religions truly are worshiping, or not ... Well done, very informative sermon!
@bridgefin
2 жыл бұрын
HAHAHA. Mac doesn't have a clue about the Catholic Church. And pride and arrogance are on the stage for all to see. He is just another servant of the devil, spreading lies and deception.
@1234poppycat
2 жыл бұрын
those who make up their own Churches reject the Gospel of Christ and his Catholic Church !! ck “I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel- not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed. For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ.” Galatians 1:6-10
@jesusfaith2232
Жыл бұрын
@@1234poppycat The Enemy from within destroying the Catholic Church ..by E. Gajewski Over one hundred years ago Pope Pius X warned us of the enemy not from without but from within. Vatican II, the cult of man. Pope Paul 6th equated Vatican II to the cult of man. Vatican II foundationally speaking comes from man and not God. It is the religion of man which hides behind the whole “human dignity” babble just as Pope St. Pius X warned. Vatican II is not centered around the Church’s teaching on the Social Kingship of Christ but rather of the united brotherhood of man. Archbishop Lefebvre understood when he said, ““We cannot work together with these enemies of Our Lord’s reign. “We cannot follow these people. They’re in apostasy, … “How did the union, against nature, between the Church and the Revolution give birth to the monster (Vatican II), whose incoherencies now fill with fright even its most ardent supporters?” (Archbishop Lefebvre, “They Have Uncrowned Him”, 1988) ….. Me: Pope Frances : 30th Jan 2021 Pope criticises Catholics who reject Vatican 2 Quote “ Those who reject the teachings of the Second Vatican Council are placing themselves outside the church, either you are with the Church and therefore you follow the council, or you interpret it in your own away - according to your desire - and you do not stand with the Church,” Warning against a mentality which says “we are the true Catholics”, he cited those believers who split from the Roman Church following the First Vatican Council (1869-70) over the teaching on papal infallibility, and are part of the “Old Catholic Church”. Francis said that today this group ordains women, which runs contrary to official Catholic teaching. The 84-year-old Jesuit Pope told members of the National Catechetical Office of the Italian Bishops’ Conference. Me: look up the list of “Old Catholic Church “ ~~~~~~~~~~ The Pew study, issued Aug. 5, showed that 69% of all self-identified Catholics said they believed the bread and wine used at Mass are not Jesus, but instead "symbols of the body and blood of Jesus Christ." The other 31% believed in the real presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, known as transubstantiation. "Most Catholics who believe that the bread and wine are symbolic do not know that the church holds that transubstantiation occurs," said Gregory Smith, associate director of research at Pew Research Center in Washington. "Overall, 43% of Catholics believe that the bread and wine are symbolic and also that this reflects the position of the church. "Still, one in five Catholics - 22% - reject the idea of transubstantiation, even though they know about the church's teaching," Smith said. Me: Even Robert Barron was shocked at the findings!.. Look at the Catholic Charismatic Movement, I’ve posted in more detail and growing fast. One pope said you out if you reject Vat2 the other says you in apostasy? Frances says the Old Catholic Church ordain women yet he ordains gay priests, gays taking mass, shuffle priests….heck pope Frances has his face on the LGBT magazine, beware RC you might be outside the church, funny when one pope discredits another pope …”apostolic succession “….ha ha So cult man you in or out 😂……
@mitchellosmer1293
Жыл бұрын
@@1234poppycat Again---The "religion " Catholic IS NOT IN THE BIBLE!!!!! The FIRST time is was even written down was by Ignatius of Antioch in 110AD!!!!!!!! quote---those who make up their own Churches reject the Gospel of Christ...--unquote and YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE!!!! --You refuse to accept the teachings of Christ regarding the Sabbath----You REFUSE to keep the Sabbath Commandment!!! You REFUSE to OBEY GOD regarding idol worship. ----You REFUSE to ACCAEPT that Mary is NOT a mediator. 1 Peter 5:6---- -Humble yourselves, therefore, under God's mighty hand, that he may lift you up in due time. Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for you. (John 14:6-----“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me”). Christians are often criticized for claiming that Jesus is the only way to God. -----Do you really think God appreaciates the implication that He is a liar? ----John 14:13-14 13 And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.1 Timothy 2:5 ******1 Tim 2:5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, -=---The NAME of Jesus!!! --Not the name of Mary!!! ******IN ALL OF ETERNITY BEFORE GOD CREATED MAN.THERE WAS GOD, GOD THE FATHER,GOD THE SON SON, GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT. WHERE IS MARY? NO MARY?! SO THAT MEANS MARY WAS BORN IN THE FLESH LIKE EVERYONE ELSE! THE BIBLE SAYS,THERE IS NO ONE WHO IS JUST, NO NOT ONE. FOR ALL HAVE SINNED AND COME SHORT OF THE GLORY OF GOD. WE ALL NEED A SAVIOUR.TO SAY MARY WAS BORN WITHOUT ORGINAL SIN IS CALLING GOD A LIER! MARY IS NOT WHAT CATHOLICISM TEACHES ABOUT HER. THEY'RE MAKING MARY EQUAL WITH GOD!! THERE IS NO MOTHER IN THE GODHEAD!!! *****Who invented purgatory? Jacques Le Goff The most prominent modern historian of the idea of Purgatory, Jacques Le Goff, dates the term purgatorium to around 1170; and in 1215 the Church began to set out the actual length of time in Purgatory required of souls. (IF it is in the Holy Bible--Why INVENT IT?) ****as·sump·tion (of Mary) /əˈsəm(p)SH(ə)n/ Learn to pronounce noun 1. a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof. WITHOUT PROOF!!!!! *****The virgin Mary, by God’s grace, recognized that she needed the Savior. The Bible never says that Mary was anyone but an ordinary human whom God chose to use in an extraordinary way. Yes, Mary was a righteous woman and favored (graced) by God (Luke 1:27-28). At the same time, Mary was a sinful human being who needed Jesus Christ as her Savior, just like everyone else (Ecclesiastes 7:20; Romans 3:23; 6:23; 1 John 1:8). ***** kzitem.info/news/bejne/qWio132sbpSdaaQ 10 Claims by POPE FRANCIS That CONTRADICT the BIBLE **** kzitem.info/news/bejne/2md4sX6KjGupl44 Is Infant Baptism Biblical?( selected scriptures **** kzitem.info/news/bejne/lLCwtYiQkKdlf5g 10 Facts About the VIRGIN MARY You're Not Being Told (Especially If You're Catholic) *****SOLA SCRIPTURE Isaiah 8:20 To the teaching and to the testimony! If they will not speak according to this word, it is because they have no light.- The ONLY writings INSPIRED by God is what IS written in scripture!!! ---Sola Scriptura is the Latin translation for Scripture alone. As a whole, the phrase means that God’s Word is sufficient and has the highest authority for all of life. This does not mean that the Bible is clear on every issue or question we have. (NOPE---The Catholic church is above the Holy Word of God). *****The BEAST of REVELATION Is Here But People Don't See it kzitem.info/news/bejne/poeYmmF5i5uCfnY ***** Jesus says quite simply "If ye love me, keep my commandments." John 14:15 and "He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him." 1 John 2:4 "Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city." Revelation 22:14 There are many sincere Christians who are honestly misguided on the importance of obeying God's commandments. God is calling His people in these last days to return to obedience. His last day people are described in Revelation: "Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus." Revelation 14:12 The commandments have always been God's standard of right and wrong, and breaking the commandments is the very definition of sin (1 John 3:4). --(NOT according to the catholic church--They decide what commandments they wil keep and wil change whatever THEY decide)--Just as the Holy Bible prophesied. ****
@KristiLEvans1
Жыл бұрын
Many of his congregants are former Catholics, with still-Catholic family members. I too, appreciate that he carefully and thoroughly equips people in this area.
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *You kept dodging ... where in the Bible or real history ever said "Roman religion = CHurch Christ founded or the Universal Church"? Where is your proof? Still waiting ...*
@dentonhunt2640
22 күн бұрын
Praise be to Jesus for the church that gave us the Bible , if you google Justin Martyr 2nd century, he talks about the order of the mass , Christ Jesus is the final sacrifice made present everyday til kingdom come
@Ribastein
9 ай бұрын
Mmmm...the bible did not exist for the first 300 years of the church.....catch a wake ppl. Jesus didnt ask the disciples to establish a bible.....he asked them through the holy spirit to evangelise and baptise and establish a church.
@johnbrowne2170
Ай бұрын
Mmm... Jesus quoted the Old Testament.
@Mutasis_Mutandis
Ай бұрын
@@johnbrowne2170Good one!
@richardjackson7887
21 күн бұрын
God commanded you to Study and that would be the old covenant. Most of the new covenant was written to correct things they heard years after their missionary journeys. Have you ever read scripture? How about what happened on the road to Emmaus!
@HarryHafsak
16 күн бұрын
Mmmmm someone’s arguing about it something they know zero about.
@barbiewert7182
Жыл бұрын
Love your teacher of Bible God Bless you
@1234poppycat
Жыл бұрын
If only he was. Unfortunately he is a hate preacher who does not know God..He is completely tragic as he thinks success is lies in bringing people away from Gods Catholic Church. In another hate video he says Catholics worship Mary ! At 5 minutes he misrepresents the Catholic Mass ONCE Part of the Eucharistic prayer is "as we join in this one perfect sacrifice"" He ignores 14 scripture start with John 6 The Mass is a requirement insisted by Jesus -- this is why he will never enter into a debate with any Catholic priest or Catholic clergy -- it is so easy to show up MacArthur lies I say again Catholic Mass is joining in the ONE sacrifice btw the priesthood is because of the growth of the Church they are lesser Bishops which we have in the New Testament Mr MacArthur is a false preacher offering false claims as he leads a false church !!
@bryanblanks1714
Жыл бұрын
Martin Luther and other Reformers pointed to the seat of Rome as the Anti-Christ.
@bridgefin
Жыл бұрын
As they were working directly for the anti-Christ!
@1234poppycat
Жыл бұрын
They also said that Catholics do not honour Mary enough and urge ONE protestant church in each country ... Mr MacArthur is completely tragic as he thinks success is lies in bringing people away from Gods Catholic Church. In another hate video he says Catholics worship Mary ! At 5 minutes he misrepresents the Catholic Mass ONCE Part of the Eucharistic prayer is "as we join in this one perfect sacrifice"" He ignores 14 scripture start with John 6 The Mass is a requirement insisted by Jesus -- this is why he will never enter into a debate with any Catholic priest or Catholic clergy -- it is so easy to show up MacArthur lies I say again Catholic Mass is joining in the ONE sacrifice btw the priesthood is because of the growth of the Church they are lesser Bishops which we have in the New Testament Mr MacArthur is a false preacher offering false claims as he leads a false church !!
@furyfantoo
10 ай бұрын
@@1234poppycat Catholics DO worship Mary.
@1234poppycat
10 ай бұрын
@@furyfantoo Catholic Catechism "Worship is reserved for the Godhead alone (Father Son and Holy Spirit)"
@furyfantoo
10 ай бұрын
@@1234poppycat Catholics will kneel down in front of a STATUE of Mary to PRAY to Mary. Explain how that isn't worship.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@bridgefin *Where in the Bible says believers need to "follow Catholic teachings" and not "biblical teachings"? WHo says Roman religion is the only infallible interpreter of Scriptures? WHere?* you said As for Scripture he recommends at 1:39 that a persona interpretation allows one to measure THEIR understanding of Scripture against Catholic teaching.
@jediv9492
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *You are still dodging... Yet you claimed you had answered? Cite me one Apostle who used an altar or sacrificed Jesus on the altar back to God. Just one? You cant?* 1 2 3
@ChristianMig1980
9 ай бұрын
In the process of transition, the most heart breaking thing I've faced is the deconstruction of my beliefs from Roman Catholicism. I am still Catholic, but it pains me even more having awareness of its paganism and false teachings. 😔 I suppose that God will use me right where he found me. The solution is NOT to leave the church, but to bring truth to my bothers and sisters in the church. Lord give me wisdom and patience.
@jaym684
9 ай бұрын
It's hard to hear I know... There are many other churches that would love to to have you... going to a new church is always hard but something to think about. Have you ever been to a church outside of the Roman Catholic Church?
@colvinator1611
9 ай бұрын
Kraftermig. Heed the solemn warning of the Lord Jesus Christ and GET OUT. Revelation 18 : 4 King James Bible.
@colvinator1611
9 ай бұрын
@@jaym684 There is nothing about ' going to church ' or church buildings in my King James Bible. These unbiblical trappings were invented by the vatican to control people and soak up their money with lying satanic doctrines such as purgatory and the mass. The priesthood and temple worship were abolished by the Lord Jesus Christ at Calvary. See Hebrews 7, 8 & 9 ( KJV )
@hamidrabiipour9707
9 ай бұрын
Hey christianmig, Perhaps watching a few videos by Michael Cumbie or John Bergsma would help you understand some issues more clearly.
@colvinator1611
9 ай бұрын
@@hamidrabiipour9707 Perhaps getting saved and buying a King James Bible would be the best idea. 1 Corinthians 15 : 1-8, Ephesians 2 : 8-9 et al ( KJV )
@jediv9910
Ай бұрын
@MrProsat *Heb 7,9,10 totally refutes all Roman pagan Mass, Roman pagan altars and ROman pagan priesthood. So yes. I have read.* you said But have you read Hebrews 10?
@user-xs9nw5dg8k
27 күн бұрын
You certainly don't sound like a fellow Christian constantly complaining about your brother in Christ, without joy or happiness in your tone; like the Israelites in the wilderness, or Jeremiah with his lot, or Martha about her sister Mary.
@jediv9910
26 күн бұрын
@@user-xs9nw5dg8k *You are most certainly not a Christian since you do not believe in God's Word.* *R Catholicism has nothing to do with God and His Words. R Catholic Church contradicts Scriptures in every possible ways!* 1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10. 2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39. 3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47. 4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10. 5. Catholics say drink of the physical blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26. 6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19. 7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5. 8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians. 9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18. 10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”. 11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10. 12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10. 13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6. 14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it. 15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity. you said You certainly don't sound like a fellow Christian constantly complaining about your brother in Christ, without joy or happiness in your tone; like the Israelites in the wilderness, or Jeremiah with his lot, or Martha about her sister Mary.
@jediv9910
26 күн бұрын
@@user-xs9nw5dg8k *Exposing Roman pagan doctrines is not complaint. You lack knowledge.*
@michaelterry4394
26 күн бұрын
@@jediv9910 thank you !
@pattihawks353
Ай бұрын
Thank you.
@zorandusic7079
Ай бұрын
Nice video bud. I'm off to Mass now, to cleanse my ears from this nonsense. Glory to Lord Jesus and to His Apostolic churches.
@MsRAUL68
19 күн бұрын
All facts . Look it up
@jediv3381
5 ай бұрын
@TruthHasSpoken *You failed to answer once again. If Roman religion had fixed a Universal Canon and Roman popes were infallible and all ruling, then why there were still other canons in Ad 592 and 1442? Why is that so? Explain coherently intelligently.*
@nosuchthing8
2 ай бұрын
Seems Jesus chose peter/rock to build his church on...
@jediv3381
2 ай бұрын
@@nosuchthing8 *That does not prove Roman religion inherited the authority of Peter or was successor of Peter. I would really love to see Roman pagans prove your self claims. I haven't seen any.* you said Seems Jesus chose peter/rock to build his church on...
@jediv3381
2 ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *If Roman Catholicism is truth or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.* - submit to Roman pope to be saved - devote to Roman Mary to be saved - be in Roman Church to be saved - partake Roman sacraments to be saved - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved - do lots of works to be saved
@bridgefin
2 ай бұрын
Any Catholic who is saved started that Journey with the same spirit and water as Jesus mentioned in John 3.
@PInk77W1
Ай бұрын
I’m Catholic 63y. I have no clue what you’re talking about. LoL.
@bridgefin
Ай бұрын
@@PInk77W1 He hates Catholicism with a passion. Makes little sense but puts himself in everyone's way.
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@@bridgefin *Bible does not mention Roman Catholic or Catholic. Neither saved by submitting to Roman pagan popes or being in Roman pagan religion or devoting to Roman pagan Mary. Neither baptising in Roman pagan baptism conducted by Roman pagan priesthood. So what ns journey are you referring to?* you said Any Catholic who is saved started that Journey with the same spirit and water as Jesus mentioned in John 3.
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@@PInk77W1 *Yes ignoramuses always say that.* you said I’m Catholic 63y. I have no clue what you’re talking about. LoL.
@jediv9910
Ай бұрын
@PInk77W1 *You are dodging .. Bible and real history did not say "Roman pagan religion = the Church Christ founded or the Universal Church" though. No RC can prove this self claim. So how?*
@MrProsat
Ай бұрын
straw man. Catholic church is not a "roman pagan religion", so naturally, no catholic could prove that.
@jediv3381
Ай бұрын
@chrismason8476 *You claimed Jesus and APostles did not take doctrines from God's Word only. So please list out which other source they took doctrines from. Cite some examples.* 1 2 3 *You can't.*
Пікірлер: 4,2 М.