Gripen has the same features with F16 but more cheaper and longer range. Definitely Gripen E for now.
@dans78
Ай бұрын
F16V has a range of 4250 Km and Gripen 3200 Km so F16 Viper has longer range
@vidivici0075
Ай бұрын
@@dans78 I would say both. They are awesome pieces that will remain useful for the next 30 years or so
@bertronix182
Ай бұрын
@@dans78 Its not F16V though but only F16 the old variant. Only 804 km range as stated on the video.
@johna3142
Ай бұрын
@@bertronix182 Gripen E costs more than a Block 70 F-16. The one which is cheaper is the Gripen C/D variant but is has less payload and range, different airframe from the E/F and its production line is closed.
@dencan3209
Ай бұрын
@@dans78 di naman ganun kalaki ang pinas para maging importante ang range sabihin na natin na mabibili natin gripen 1 squadron in luzon 1 squadron in visayas 1 squadron mindanao mas maganda tlaga ang f16v pero dahil mas nakamura tyo na na sacrifice ang range na di nman ganun ka importante nakabili pa tyo ng anti air defense or anti ship defense
@misha791
Ай бұрын
14 Gripen with dedicated support, maintenance and long range anti-ship missiles for maritime security deterrence and 45 combat F16's. Philippine airforce are already training in Australia for the incoming Multi role fighters.
@chillxxx241
Ай бұрын
Getting a mix would definitely not hurt. Improved relations with Sweden would only help the Philippines.
@chrispunzalan7471
Ай бұрын
45 F16s? Where did you get that info?
@userjlj
Ай бұрын
45 F-16's.. send the link for your source..
@chillxxx241
Ай бұрын
@@userjlj The Ukraine was promised 45 F-16s. The Philippines was cleared to purchase 12 F 16’s from Denmark in 2021 but could not find the money. Those F-16s are now going to Ukraine and Argentina. Greece is trying to sell some of their old F-16s. Argentina would like more and Brazil is looking to possibly upgrade to the F-16 too. Poland has also offered up close to 20 MiG-29s if they are given a suitable substitute.
@intellectualenigma
Ай бұрын
I would say that Gripen E is better choice for Phillippeans they'll get more aircrafts in good price & the weapons package & the highlighting EW suite which has matched the likes of Rafale & TYPHOON in airtoair combact. Gripen is a very effecient fighter jet which I don't know why never get the due it deserves because Sweden is not the permanent memeber of UN.
@dans78
Ай бұрын
You mean NATO and not UN= United nations I think. Sweden is from 7 march 2024 an official member of NATO
@albertjamesdano1787
Ай бұрын
Tejas 10th generation fighter jets 😂
@daniloderecho9145
Ай бұрын
Pwede rin daw ilanding sa mga highways ang gripen..
@TheBooban
Ай бұрын
@@dans78no. He meant UN. Sweden does not sit in the UN Security Council and is why it cannot sell weapons so well. If you buy from the US, you get UN vote protection. If you buy from Sweden, Sweden will embargo you as soon as there is any shooting because Sweden scared of the Chinese and like love and peace and all that.
@mikecharlielima
Ай бұрын
@@daniloderecho9145lahat naman ng aircraft pwede ilanding sa highway, emergency procedure nila yun wla sila makitang clear area
@sceptikalmedia
Ай бұрын
I would choose the Gripen E in a mostly maritime environment.
@verdebusterAP
Ай бұрын
While the F-16 is the better plane, the JAS-39 is better for the Philippines budget but most importantly, given the Philippines proximity to China, the JAS-39 has better survival-ability as its made for austere operations
@vidivici0075
Ай бұрын
Why not both
@verdebusterAP
Ай бұрын
@@vidivici0075 Budget
@vidivici0075
Ай бұрын
@@verdebusterAP yeah
@rockhard9369
Ай бұрын
Hahaha, you know nothing, F16 been proven on battle fields, Gripen is just lovely blond jet, just for looks.
@grantamparado6440
Ай бұрын
In Ukraine-Russia conflict, most allied nations want to give their F16 to the Ukrainian air force, The problem is it will take more than a year to fly that plane. Hope Philippines will learn from this.
@wilfredgismundo7405
Ай бұрын
It is unlikely that the Philippines does not defend itself from Chinese aggression. Acquiring fighter jets is one of the indications. Maybe both fighter jets should be acquired.
@xamina12345
Ай бұрын
we lack funds.. we only have enough for 12 Gripen or 6 F-16 for now
@darkflamemaster6541
Ай бұрын
having two different multirole jets will only cause to spend much on maintenance due to difference of parts and equipment and different use of training.
@politicfrog
Ай бұрын
The Gripen looks scary to be honest it looks like it can fire 8 missiles at once. lol
@jessiej147
Ай бұрын
go to Gripen E..best choice for ph.
@Boglimgolteb
Ай бұрын
F16 would probably take decades to be delivered anyways
@archangel763
Ай бұрын
Gripen is a better choice.
@johnahmedgeli9655
Ай бұрын
I think that if you look at it speed 2, 470 KM/H, Range 3,200 KM, length 15.2 M, weight 14,000 KG, cost 35.40 million dollar, is nice price and beautiful style Gripen E was the best! Bye
@jaytech7514
Ай бұрын
The Gripen is designed to counter Russian jets. China mainly copied all Russian designed jets. so the Gripen is well suited for the Philippines also the gripen is at par when it comes to price with the F16's but at lower maintenance cost. F16's has E warfare variant but the Gripen has the capability of being an MRF with integrated excellent Ewarfare capability.
@edselroysaludo9232
Ай бұрын
that’s right 💪🏻
@bikeride1443
Ай бұрын
they know it thats why they hire technical working group with different expertise
@deguzmanerwinl.6273
Ай бұрын
in 1997 the philippine air force considered purchasing the f/a-18 C/D variants of that aircraft the reason why it not proceed because of the financial crisis back then
@stephenbachman132
Ай бұрын
I would go with the Gripn it actually meets their requirements and is built to be cost effective and quick an easy to get in the air. It can also land on poor surfaces. The F16 will have a better weapons loadout but be way more expensive
@MiSt3300
Ай бұрын
Gripen is better, overdependence on the US is never good
@TheBooban
Ай бұрын
US has defense treaty with Philippines. Sweden not coming to help them.
@nogibertv4824
Ай бұрын
but majority of the core parts of Gripen is USA made.. if we dont want to be dependence of US we should go for Rafale or Typhoon. or better yet KF21 or The Turkish Kaan.
@TheBooban
Ай бұрын
@@MiSt3300 thank kind of thinking is why the US was forced out of Clark and Subic. If not for that, China would never have dared doing what it is doing now.
@temujin0911
Ай бұрын
from a logistical supply standpoint, the F-16 is a better option for the PH...
@CharlieDean-ki6wb
Ай бұрын
That's what i also think about the F-16 has logistical advantage "during wartime" whereas the USA and it's territories or the parts source have vector proximity in the country. Thought the Gripen is a very juicy proposition because of advantageous physical capabilities.
@temujin0911
Ай бұрын
@@CharlieDean-ki6wb you also have to factor in training and aircraft availability, the F-16 already has a very wide user base making maintenance and replacements easier… the Gripen is an outstanding aircraft and has more advanced avionics than the basic F-16s but transitioning pilots between aircrafts will take time just like what happened in Ukraine…
@temujin0911
Ай бұрын
btw, one of the main advantages of the Gripen over the F-16 is that it can use the Meteor missile which is more capable than the AMRAAM…
@yeaz2779
Ай бұрын
it is no longer a competition between SAAB and LM, rather the government wants both platforms
@temujin0911
Ай бұрын
@@yeaz2779 well, that's going to be a problem in the long run... good luck to them.
@acruxheisenberg4381
Ай бұрын
For me, gripen e would be best choice, considering the current number of fighters the country has. Thus, it is more logical to purchase fighters with great speed and long operational range it which the gripen has the upper hand. AFP must have quick and deadly fighters in it's arsenal considering the vast territory it needs to cover and with very limited number of operational fighters
@giacomogiacomo1194
Ай бұрын
We don't want conflict but we are being forced by this Bully🇨🇳 to fight back.
@cheongchoong6654
Ай бұрын
then stay out of SCS waters. And peace will be with pinoys. Period.
@choyanzallatinoba3183
Ай бұрын
We dont speak dog languages@@cheongchoong6654
@zoromia28
Ай бұрын
@cheongchoong6654 stay out of the south east asian waters deep shit even the other east asians dont claim it only the two chinas lol
@lanky_j7701
Ай бұрын
@@cheongchoong6654China is the one who should get out in the Philippine territory..
@cheongchoong6654
Ай бұрын
@@lanky_j7701 read the history wayback 1890s b4 you said it's yours.
@HaggiyoPilipinas
Ай бұрын
Why not get a squadron each? Come on PBBM!
@bikeride1443
Ай бұрын
they will buy 40+ unit
@wesamboy
25 күн бұрын
hahahahahahaha bili ng flying saucer
@byron8657
Ай бұрын
Its Gripen JAS for the Philippines the Bang for our bucks our peso! All features at Par with F16 plus much cheaper we can acquaire more and easier to maintain k! Go Go Go Philippine Airforce k!
@xanaphiatotnax2504
Ай бұрын
Yeah, that’s why everyone’s lining up to buy the gripen? 😂
@lmac1807
Ай бұрын
I would say Gripen E would be better overall. Considering Saab has made it able to work on all sorts of runways, including highways
@f50koenigg
Ай бұрын
Gripen E!!
@AccordGTR
Ай бұрын
The decision should be a logistical one, not political. Let the pilots and the ground crews who will fly it choose. What do you guys know?
@SpeakOut_with_ReyCMutia_2014
Ай бұрын
Swedish aircraft .... more cheaper... considering its algorithms and price.... it's for the Philippines for now vi's-a-vi's the Philippine budget....🇵🇭🇸🇪🇸🇪🇵🇭
@humpreygarduque8220
Ай бұрын
OK YAN JAS 39 GRIPIN E ..NG. PARA SA PHIL AIRFORCE .. F/A 18 SUPER HORNET E/F NAMAN PARA SA PHIL NAVY.. MARITIME PATROL & FOR MID AIR REFUELING FUNCTION OR TANKER..PARA SA GRIPINS..ETC..
@369IRISH
Ай бұрын
The Swedish gripen jets as stats provide are more closer to 5th gen fighters while f-16s are now outdated typical 4th gen not 4.5 literally 3.5 tp 4 lol
@soupnazi8061
Ай бұрын
Somebody is playing his cards to delay the decision on which MRF to pick
@markvalencia58
Ай бұрын
Who is that might gonna be?
@manuelsumang9734
Ай бұрын
Go go PHIL.DONT GIVE UP GO FIGHT N FIGHT UNTIL WE WIN.
@darkwing4298
Ай бұрын
I would like to thank china for opening the eyes of our government to procure advance equipment to protect our country.
@rockhard9369
Ай бұрын
Manila just buy fighter jets, don't mean they will challenge big china, your leaders are weak.
@dyxasofficial
Ай бұрын
Its a 30 year old MRF SAGA in the Philippines. 30 years of planning for only a few MRF!!! SHAME on Government!!
@erwinnadate6485
Ай бұрын
Dipa kasi puno mga bolsa Nila sir
@reymiguelperez6643
Ай бұрын
Add 40+ years. Since 1976, America has been offering the F-16 since then.
@bblocks3741
Ай бұрын
BUY BOTH
@FernandoLapulapu
Ай бұрын
Don't push for F-16... maintenance and operational costs is too much expensive...and the Philippine government can not afford the price of an F-16 squadron...
@ProtagonistMaster794
Ай бұрын
The gripen at least cost 80 million usd
@jezzeldelapena9603
Ай бұрын
both
@Vendell_23
Ай бұрын
And the AFP modernization is barely a decade old its still ramping up its modernization and they will be acquiring more modern assets in the next 10 years
@greyson042290
Ай бұрын
both planes are on China's intelligence because of Pakistan and Thailand are known to be China's bootlickers... they know the strength and weaknesses and they knew how it works and how it was made, we must outsource other manufacturers, Japan had Shinshin but their no export laws are still implemented... south Korea and Indonesian joint venture on their new KF21 might be the best option to choose for now as it was made in secrecy
@dans78
Ай бұрын
Has not South Korea uppgraded the newest FA50 PH have today of older versions. Then those FA50 more modern might be the best and chepest för PH. The new KF21 Is still not in action what I know so it will tace to long to wait for? The China kan start war imminent
@vidivici0075
Ай бұрын
@greyson042290 that could if the Philippines is not supported by Japan, US and Australia surveillance systems. Plus, anti-air. these will just be for defensive purposes primarily
@bingbing3464
Ай бұрын
Or you can just be diplomatic to china like the entire continental south east asia did and get free protection and infrastructures instead of becoming the next nato puppet like ukraine. Nato knew they cant use korea, japan and taiwan to start a proxy war with china because the koreans, japanese and taiwanese are smart to not allow it, that's why now they turn to pinoys.
@user-vd9is6pi6x
Ай бұрын
Jas39 gripen E 💪❤️
@77leny
Ай бұрын
Gripen can take of from the roads, has better tech, cost less in service and i think they use air to air meteor missiles
@hdk07
Ай бұрын
Buy both
@tab529
Ай бұрын
Phil can get initial 12 Nos SAB 39 E then place an order for 24 Nos F16 Block 70 Viper and use the EDA to get additional 36 Nos used F16 CD to be transferred after order of F6 Viper for retrofit to Block 70 in 3 phases ,12 Nos per phase will allow PAF to use the 24 F16 CD
@manuelsumang9734
Ай бұрын
Phil GOD IS ON YOUR BACK GO FIGHT FIGHT FOR OUR FREEDOM.
@JeanYouLuckyBoi
Ай бұрын
As a World of Tanks Blitz player here, I suggest South Korea's brand new KF-21 Boramae 💪😤
@entertexthere1127
Ай бұрын
F16 Viper for me. Better.
@agniksen8507
Ай бұрын
Gripen E is the clear choice here it is cost effective and it covers a wider range.
@user-tx7pk3jz2s
Ай бұрын
That weight difference is crazy.
@agniksen8507
Ай бұрын
And it has spare parts available all the time.
@Overneed-Belkan-Witch
Ай бұрын
Europe fighters are always a good choice But they should eyeing on the new upcoming Korean 4.5 gen
@kamote_korps
Ай бұрын
2 squadrons of Gripen D/E and another squadron of F-16 block 70 plus additional 2 squadrons of FA-50 block 20... I think that should be enough.
@lanceacejo5733
Ай бұрын
i think we're getting both (f16V and JAS 39 E/F) i heard that USA offers second hand f16 C/D that could easily convert to Vipers if they picked the vipers and sweden offers their AWACS if they select the gripens
@rockhard9369
Ай бұрын
You right, i think they will buy some f16 too, depend on USA for helps and training.
@letsg4353
Ай бұрын
Gripen all the way!
@totofred8420
Ай бұрын
Our/My County The Philippines favorite script/line when presscon occurs: "Were eyeing, planning, considering, might be an option".
@grimjoetv2692
Ай бұрын
Gripen sana para mapadali mahaba ang listahan ng f16 order
@arminjoemarblanche1948
Ай бұрын
Gripen have the advantage
@danielpaulin7119
Ай бұрын
As war thunder player here I highly recommend for real military air force requirements for new aircraft fighters/ multirole Jets and Air supiority Aircraft the best candidate is F-16C Block 50/51 or New variants F-16 Block 70/71 Lockheed Martin design, it's very Modern variants and improved Sensor and Missile system SAM/ air to ground/ CAS/ Air to Air capabilities/ latest anti Missile system and it have best Engine for Multirole Aircraft definitely F-16s can competing the Chinese New SU-27 Flanker or SU-35S Flanker E and Mig-29s variants even if the F-16 pretty expensive to buy and maintenance and training programs and supply for parts F-16s are very useful and more dangerous for Chinese Air Forces
@ivangim1
16 күн бұрын
Get F16s for better interoperability amongst the air forces in ASEAN as well as for regional air exercises and air force exchanges.
@jan3019
Ай бұрын
We should get them both. F16 are great too
@arminjoemarblanche1948
5 күн бұрын
Gripen E brand new at F-16 secondhand for now.
@whiskeytangofoxtrot2324
Ай бұрын
it is much better to acquire the Gripen giving its cost-effective advantage and let the US operate the F 16 by allowing them access to more bases to assist in the front against China. Why buy the expensive F 16 when you can lease bases for them to which they will use to defend the Philippines based on the Mutual Defense Pact, that's what they wanted anyway.
@ChasingEnigma
Ай бұрын
It's going to be both. F16's are going to be provided by the Americans via the PERA act $2.5 Billion, it's a bill to modernize the defense capabilities of the Philippines, and for other purposes enacted and signed by the US senate. The US will not allow their funds to be used to buy that aren't made by American companies like Lockheed Martin. The Philippines own National defense budget are the ones going to be use to buy the Gripen
@Bobby01Ben
Ай бұрын
Choose Gripen. Thailand is now choosing between F16 and Gripen E. In conclusion, the Royal Thai Air Force chose Gripen from Thailand.
@user-bh2sb3vt1l
12 күн бұрын
Gripen, F16 현명한 선택으로 좋은 전투기 구입하기 바랍니다
@jeffangara6965
27 күн бұрын
F-16 & FA-50 (which is the PH Air Force has) has the same technology and usability so that will be the advantage. However it has high-maintenance costs, and long delivery timeframe as well.
@sayfolman7752
Ай бұрын
While Philippines Undecided Malaysia Already In Discussion With Kuwait Counter Part To Acquire F/A 18 C/D That Have Low Flying Hour
@mariomacalalad2119
Ай бұрын
F 16 fighter jets are expensive compare to gripen and buying American made with too many condition to follow is a big disadvantage to the buyer
@516GCT
26 күн бұрын
It's more practical to have Jas 39 Gripen E instead of F16 as the country's main MRF. If Gripen C had defeated Chinese jet fighters then Gripen C had lost to FA50 why not buy a squadron of single seat version of FA50? Then buy 4 to 8 squadrons of Jas 39 Gripen E and a squadron of Jas 39 Gripen F for training new pilots.
@ritotrasmonte89
Ай бұрын
Buy the Gripen J39, cheaper & still more modern...dont insist on what we cannot afford...do it now before its too late..
@timoteosantuturyo418
Ай бұрын
Gripen is the best choice because of its operational cost that the philippines can cope with
@user-ln3gh6no3e
Ай бұрын
GRIPEN E THE BEST
@kimannepark4709
Ай бұрын
The Gripen -E is new, and more advanced ECM and AESA radar and avionics and much cheaper to acquire, operate and maintain - perfect for the PH. The F-16 V is proven, battle-tested and has a large client base, but is very expensive. But the US and PH are very close defense allies and strategic partners and has more sway and the US has great influence in the country. 97% of Filipinos trusts the USA (while an overwhelming 85% of Filipinos consider China as a very serious threat to the country's national security). So it might boil down to a political decision if the PH selects the F-16 V.
@grantamparado6440
Ай бұрын
In Ukraine-Russia conflict, most allied nations want to give their F16 to the Ukrainian air force, The problem is it will take more than a year to fly that plane. Hope Philippines will learn from this.
@jhonargarcia2880
Ай бұрын
Good Job PBBM Administration in the World Leaders Continues 🙏🌏🌏
@4rct1c9Ic3m4n
Ай бұрын
F16 block 70/72 is superior to the Gripen. Brazil has Gripens and now purchasing old F16s to plug capability gap
@musicforthesoul8027
Ай бұрын
Get both. But first acquire Gripen E for its longer range, it's cheaper and we needed it now. Then acquire F-16s in the future! Then we can see FA-50s + Gripen Es + F16's flying in our skies!
@gritzen1600
Ай бұрын
it's taking so long. make up your mind already.
@mongo0179
Ай бұрын
Budget or maybe lack of
@randmvid
Ай бұрын
both are good but i go for griffen E. much more cheaper at mas marami ka mabibili kumpara sa F-16. mas mura pa ang mga spare for maintenance
@GenBril
Ай бұрын
In time of conflict, it will be hard for PH to buy spareparts for Gripen.
@isaganiracal3053
Ай бұрын
Buy both and buy submarines
@nonitopanes
Ай бұрын
for me i much prefare gripen for the time being for we are short of budget this plane is almost same as F35 the most important is we have the plane to be used to protect our nation which is capble of defending our teritories and our nation
@Mistah2
Ай бұрын
Just buy both , each has their own strengths and weaknesses.
@user-gd1oy9nl1d
Ай бұрын
Best tested inwar f 16
@chad_dogedoge
20 күн бұрын
F-16 , swedish also has a problems in its Border Russia , and in case of Russian Attack on Sweden/Finland it would hamper the production of Gripen.
@iBeatBoxz8
Ай бұрын
That’s cute, they think buying a few planes will help them against a war with China😂😂
@tenavrisen9279
Ай бұрын
I don't think that's what's intended for. Besides, they have MDT with the US.. They don't even have to buy anything.
@renatocorpuz9651
Ай бұрын
For me, both F16 and JAS 39 will acquire to boost air Defence of PAF.
@Jhunef
Ай бұрын
2 set squadrons( F-16 & Gripen E) Boost air defences🇵🇭
@NovenritoPutra
Ай бұрын
For neutral objective, i prefer gripen e/f than f16 viper
@seenyouyt6885
Ай бұрын
F-16 for easy access to spare parts. Gripen is cheaper to ooerate though
@donjayviente751
19 күн бұрын
I think gripen and f16 list will set asside due to the treats that the Philippine facing Right now.... The france dassault rafale was the decided future procurement as per the dnd... Philippines has an unusual archipelagic territory and it requires a very wide area defense coverage... The dassault rafale was the choice...
@netxzero3993
Ай бұрын
No matter the choice is that we are all winners if the MRF program pushes through. This has been the ultimate topic since the 90s. Sad thing is there is so much red tape going on and no sense of urgency to get this done. The navy and coast guard is beefing up while the air domination factor is still nothing.
@renmedalla
Ай бұрын
Other countries buy enough aircraft to equip squadrons, even our ASEAN neighbors. Philippines is better off investing in Anti-access/Area Denial systems and acquire enough aerial and sea drones to effectively and cheaply counter aggressor states who have real navies and air forces.
@boypazaway5833
Ай бұрын
Buy Both why? Because this will take time to make or build. It's not same as buying a mobile phone or other assets it I'll not be delivered in a week. We need all this ASAP.
@richardobedencio675
Ай бұрын
good
@giancarlocajitayamato334
Ай бұрын
Griffen is low cost aircraft ideal for PAF
@user-im5fe3sd5v
Ай бұрын
Im tired of waiting for this mrf procurement updates im afraid it won't happen never
@rccl-u8g
Ай бұрын
PAF must Consider buying the Jas 39 Grippen E. As this is EU - NATO fighting jets .The most Advance none stelth Aircraft. Plus transfer of technology as Swedens Offered to us.
@user-gx8ww8oc7h
Ай бұрын
finally
@ArhonPaulMarquina
Ай бұрын
Plot twist: *they award the contract for 24 KAI KF21s.. sometimes the PH govt have a good (and bad) habit of surprising us Filipinos, but it'll be really nice if this do happen. but if this will go by the book, they would get the JAS39, not just because of the aircraft itself, but because of what it can carry: the MBDA Meteor, which is known as one of the most dangerous BVR missiles in the world.
@dyronsimene
Ай бұрын
Gripen and order spare parts in advance. Order from the US and they'll ship out old worn out planes again just like last time.
@Israelo7abc
Ай бұрын
French rafale would be the best choice for a multirole fighter!
@johnalbutra7397
Ай бұрын
1 dozen f16, 1 dozen f50, 1 dozen big warship, 1 dozen military camp, 1 dozen missilecamp, 1 doz. Iron dome, 1 doz radar, 1 dozen submarine thats what we need for now.
@ramongabutina8015
Ай бұрын
Better to have many more sea assets to confront China's aggressive sea claim behavior.Phils air power + US in bases is already initially enhanced .
Пікірлер: 389