This thing is a flying supercomputer with amazing technology. The pilot can just sit back press some buttons and destroy fighters and ground targets without breaking a sweat. It totally outclasses anything flying today
@danielpiazza5195
2 жыл бұрын
Great showcase any my left ear loved it the most
@USRBlueLCuthill
12 жыл бұрын
My left Ear enjoyed this
@srinitaaigaura
8 жыл бұрын
It's not brute force, but the smartest plane that wins.
@gerry7man555
8 жыл бұрын
+srinitaaigaura Sensor and software bruteforce
@mbaxter22
8 жыл бұрын
Crazy. The way all planes & distant AWARCS are interlinked together is the key. Incredible force multiplying tech that ANY fleet of combat aircraft, stealthy or otherwise, can greatly benefit from. Russia take note...
@fuckjewtube69
8 жыл бұрын
+mbaxter22 LOL you just showed that you dont even know what youre talking about. The Russians have had full data link between planes and ground radar for many decades, and thats no exaggeration. They're far more advanced in this field. The US is only now starting to do it. That was some ignorant shit lmao. Usually people who want to troll have some idea about the subject and choose to ignore it.
@LRRPFco52
6 жыл бұрын
Ouija: MiG-31 never had, and doesn't have AESA. It has PESA. Russia has never had anything like what is show in this video. Russian cockpits are just catching up with early 1980s US cockpit configurations, because Russia lacked capability to make good electronics. When the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia went throng a decade of stagnation and degradation, while trying to buy every piece of Western avionics possible. Meanwhile, the US was pursuing 5th Gen fighters that were envisioned in the 1970s and 1980s. Russian BVR missile operational history is embarrassing if you've ever studied it. There are only a few examples really with R-27, which has a 0% pk so far in BVR WEZ. Russia can't even make a domestic market cell phone, let alone comparable fighter avionics to the US.
@TonymanCS
6 жыл бұрын
OMFG love Russian trolls coming with bold claim with literally 0 proof. The best demonstartion is Syria where Russian said their SAM systems are networked with Syrian SAM (tass.com/defense/962057), giving Syrian boarder info while not having the need to fire themself. What's the result? Israel still roam over Syrian skies like their home and Russian are so afraid of an another Mole Cricket 19 they had to abandon Iran and stop selling Syrian S-300. An another case is F-22 intercepting Su-25 which in turn attarcted a Russian Su-35 who came in to save Frogfoots. Isn't it weird Russian are not bragging about F-22 detection and that _"Su-35 radar locked F-22"_ ? What kind of "datalink" this is? All you said are theories without proofs. Here is real-life result.
@airbornewhite6536
2 жыл бұрын
@@fuckjewtube69 absolute bullshit
@guillaumelalonde7945
5 ай бұрын
@fuckjewtube69 this aged well
@ToonandBBfan
11 жыл бұрын
I suppose if the pilot burps it will retract the landing gear and a fart will deploy the chaff dispenser?
@shomz
4 жыл бұрын
Have you tried going against Flankers that actually fight back, go defensive, etc.?
@MandrewP
9 жыл бұрын
I want one of these avionics systems for my car with the AESA radar!
@RayTanZL
13 жыл бұрын
@piikkiniska No, they don't have to. It's not a heat track touchscreen like the Iphone. It's using a more advance technology with a higher precision touch panel.
@shysterlicious
12 жыл бұрын
@Markkkkk26 Thank you very much for your very informative response. You made an excellent point that I did not think about when I wrote my first comments. Training--as I'm sure you know--also helps the pilots properly digest the information on a timely basis. Again, thank you for being kind enough and sharing your knowledge with me:0)
@comandosespeciales
11 жыл бұрын
I'll get one, I love them.
@Malc2169
8 жыл бұрын
Theory... Don't you just love it?
@shysterlicious
13 жыл бұрын
Fascinating stuff. I wonder, though, if it's a bit too much to handle, information wise, with the stress of combat applied. Moving cursors, split screens, waiting on aperture radar results, icons for just about everything, etc. Either way, a marvelous aircraft with memorizing ingenuity.
@JSpidey
3 жыл бұрын
Moving cursors are common among all fighter aircrafts.
@piikkiniska
13 жыл бұрын
Nice touchscreen. Do you have to take your gloves off to operate it?
@valdisfreibergs6461
5 жыл бұрын
😍 Pilots must see on the Display Red Lines to Engaged Targets...In this Blue and Green Search Map Pilots can't be Focused and Fast in Launch.
@5xthejoy
13 жыл бұрын
This is an AWESOME system. Technology is way too cool. U.S.A. at it's BEST.
@btc-btc-net
8 жыл бұрын
cool.......
@XKS99
12 жыл бұрын
Probably, but the F-35 APG-81 radar is even more advanced than the F-22s. The F-35 should have no trouble with any aircraft it's likely to face until 2030.
@Mako2-1
13 жыл бұрын
@FMXPRO199 i totally agree
@Megalodon64
12 жыл бұрын
WOW. The F-35 makes the F-22 look like a WW2 Fighter
@VARIANT192
8 жыл бұрын
USA all the enemies in the MiG-29 holds? We have T-50 series comes with the Su-35
@adebeast62
8 жыл бұрын
t50 sucks ass, and even if it was somewhat good, you cant even afford them, you can only get 12 of 52 planned lol
@jddjfilms2134
6 жыл бұрын
T 50 is even better than F 22, F 35 does not fly as it must. T 50 has got electronics like this too and boom-T 50 is the best. I ain't a russian or american.
@Thetequilashooter1
5 жыл бұрын
30T LifeOf10Blocking Want to take back your comment now that mass production of the Su-57 has been cancelled and India wants nothing to do with it?
@danielmanfroi4797
2 жыл бұрын
This simlator is real 100%?
@TheGoodChap
10 жыл бұрын
Antifaith29 Everybody's google results are different. I googled super-maneuverability and got nothing but info on the su-27 su-30 su-33 su-35 T-50 PAK etc. I'm sure the F-22 is super-maneuverable but that's one of the things Russia has been perfecting for a while now.
@testuser1337
13 жыл бұрын
You know, there is not much known or released about the pak-fa and neither the j-20. i know that the f-35/f-22 are way too expensive per unit and that a lot of customers will cut down their orders for f-35. But that and the fancy avionics-shows is all we know about. so what we can basically observe, is that a few ppl who definitely know, what everybody knows since 1995, are amused of the facts available. they sure won't be amused over the dirty little details they don't know about.
@Antifaith29
11 жыл бұрын
IN the world comming in at 28 degrees per second at 20 thousand ft. that is SUSTAINED. Higher than most other aircrafts INSTANTANIOUS. You have quite obviously gotten confused in regards to the F-22. It is a VERY manueverable fighter.
@Antifaith29
11 жыл бұрын
You know theres actually an old saying that if it looks good it probably flys good. Still, the F-22 simply would destroy this thing, the F-22 is a fucking predator, the F-35 more of a work horse.
@andrewm4951
6 жыл бұрын
Antifaith29 put the two together and what do you get..... its like having a supercar and diesel monster truck in your garage. Will take on any comers.
@donbryant58
8 жыл бұрын
IFF ABILITIES THROUGHT THESE MISSIONS ?
@magictylo668
8 жыл бұрын
f15
@GiveMeAnOKUsername
8 жыл бұрын
The displays look very complicated.
@kerdougan
13 жыл бұрын
@tambis23 : Never say this in front of a pilot who flew over Afghanistan.
@maryc4732
8 жыл бұрын
superblue tooth .
@นายกิตติกวินทร์แสงสุก
Жыл бұрын
รุ่นแรกมี่ไม่มีคนขับ
@Antifaith29
11 жыл бұрын
I mean why else would it be thrust vectored? The whole point of that was to MAKE it a supermanueverable aircraft. Please, I implore you to educate yourself in regards to the F-22 at least. You are correct in your assertion regarding the F-35 ( even though its designed to perform under a combat load and actually does ok with that in mind) But you are DEAD WRONG about the F-22. Watch the video I linked you.
@raulrusboy
14 жыл бұрын
... and I'm not allowed to take pictures in the cockpit of a TH-67, probably one of the lowliest aircraft in the military... WTF
@kerdougan
13 жыл бұрын
@tambis23: Then I have to say: Thumb up! :)
@jblo73
5 жыл бұрын
I think maybe goof but have to see when war break out first... everything here's about business
@devaryapatel1159
3 жыл бұрын
Video confuses das with eots
@muhammadindra9090
4 жыл бұрын
Glass cockpit...WISIWIG....
@vladworldzmason8244
6 жыл бұрын
Who believes in this Hollywood? Not NorKor for sure
@muhammadindra9090
5 жыл бұрын
Glass Cockpit...
@holzfu2012
10 жыл бұрын
lol 100% AMRAAM hit probability
@Ackreti
13 жыл бұрын
"The fate of the F-35 Lightning II would be far worse in an air combat environment challenged by the PAK-FA. If the Mach 1.5 PAK-FA is using its infrared sensor as the primary sensor and observes radio frequency emission control (EMCON), then the first detection by the F-35’s APG-81 radar could be at ~20 nautical miles or less with a missile launched by the PAK-FA’s infrared sensors already inbound from 60 to 70 nautical miles away. " APA think tank.
@นายกิตติกวินทร์แสงสุก
Жыл бұрын
£35สเปกโปรแกรม
@Clintwoodz
13 жыл бұрын
Windows 8 has touch screen interface..... hint hint sim designers
@TankNutJohn89
12 жыл бұрын
Su-35 is outdated junk, compared to this. Su-35 with its huge RCS can be tracked at 460km, this one at 100km. Also the Su-35 can't hover. F-35 is 3x more expensive, but could kill 6 Su-35. It reduces operating cost, pilot cost, and more.
@TheChoreia
7 жыл бұрын
How F-35 could kill Su-35? With it's radar?
@aaandag9688
6 жыл бұрын
wait what
@มดแดง-ฃ3ข
2 жыл бұрын
90,000
@Heaney5551
12 жыл бұрын
@SrNutritivo As the last posted, said, saying "LOL my jet beat yours in wargames" is BS. The Su-35 has NEVER EVER been in a wargame with the F-22. The Su-30 has however, and the F-22 took ZERO losses against the Su-30 team.
@Ackreti
13 жыл бұрын
@jiangshulin Be civilised Jiangshulin, you can always say your opinion without insulting tone. 1. Quoted article is APAs, not mine words. 2. It is related to F-35 and T-50. No word of J-20 were said, read it again if you want. 3. "Your T-50!!" I own T-50? Lucky me. 4. J-20 design is superior to F-35 and T-50.
@hiltonnathaniel
12 жыл бұрын
are you joking the f22 would destroy this plane
@faustus2058
9 жыл бұрын
Hmmm there seems to be people here who are knowledgeable about the F-35.... oh wait, they're full of shit!
@FKKJohn
12 жыл бұрын
imagine this avionics install in Su-35 Superb!!!
@NWguy83
14 жыл бұрын
A2A F-35 vs Pak-FA I probably gotta give it to PAK-FA.
@danielwarchol6178
8 жыл бұрын
AOPA >Usa*Pl
@Antifaith29
11 жыл бұрын
The F-35 is a bit of a slug but you saying the same about the F-22 proves you have no idea what youre talking about. The F-22 has the highest sustained turn rate of ANY modern aircraft. Do a little research before spewing that nonsense in future.
@DarkPrinceNH5570
12 жыл бұрын
Really? Europe really wants to buy these? They did the samething with the P-40 back in WW2.
@tsaixianfeng
12 жыл бұрын
how come the more advance the technology, the uglier the design...
@Antifaith29
11 жыл бұрын
You're full of shit. The F-22 and the F-35 are nothing alike in term of kinematic performance. The F-22 is designed to be supermanuverable. With thrust vectoring and a thrust-to-weight ratio of 1.26 at 50% fuel, it is the first production aircraft in the U.S. arsenal to be supermaneuverable. In fact go and type supermaneuverability into google and see what comes up , I dare you. Then watch this video /watch?v=GW2Hvu_mUdU Lastly as I said earlier, the F-22 has the best sustained turn (cont)
@SrNutritivo
12 жыл бұрын
@5xthejoy yeah, another ultraoverpriced piece of junk, beaten repeatedly by SU-35 (50-60 million dollars vs 150!!!) in wargames... because of that and his price, a lot of orders cancelled... including Royal Navy
@pakruy
12 жыл бұрын
55% of the avioncs don t work. That plane is an over priced tool.
@MustNotRead
12 жыл бұрын
That looks like one damn BORING jet to fly. I'd much rather fly an F16. Dumbed down jets for a dumbed down Mac Generation.
@fuckjewtube69
8 жыл бұрын
So whats the big deal about this plane? Everything I saw in this video apart from data link the F16 already has.
@playloud90278
8 жыл бұрын
+rsx123 Things the F-35 has, that the F-16 does not... 1) 2.5x the internal fuel 2) Stealth 3) Better radar (even better than the newest AESA for the F-16, as it's bigger) 4) DAS (IR sensors all around the jet, 360 spherical coverage). 5) AN/ASQ-239. Essentially a RWR on steroids. The F-16's RWR doesn't come close. 6) Sensor fusion. The F-16 has no fusion. All sensor information is shown on different screens. The F-35 has a fusion server that takes all the sensor data, and paints a single picture of the battlespace. It even automatically queues other sensors (such as the EOTS) to gather more detail on a target if needed.
@sobhanvosoulipour3244
5 жыл бұрын
F-16 has this data link with an extra JTRS data link which is used for Army and jointly with A-10Cs
Пікірлер: 85