This a good example for quick fixing and change over. Good one..
@kmcwhq
8 жыл бұрын
Could it ever be even faster?
@TWOConsultingAU
8 жыл бұрын
+kmcwhq Certainly... high performing teams continuously practice to maintain standards but also to find better ways!
@jinkly
10 жыл бұрын
Maybe you have to compare with a pitspot with refueling... 2007 F1 Shanghai GP Felipe Massa Pit stop
@raquelgerardo94
8 жыл бұрын
first, no fuel recharge, second, limit 4 crew, third, add the time of all 12 crew and idle time between pit stops and you have the real cost , anyway great improvement but apples to apples
@TWOConsultingAU
8 жыл бұрын
Very true Raquel Gerardo. Different times with different rules and best known standards for achieving the lowest possible time in the pit. The interesting question is what is the cost of achieving the goal and the size of the prize?
@Vicious5id
8 жыл бұрын
I didn't understand why these differences between pitstops illustrates SMED. SMED is something different from that, isn't it?
@TWOConsultingAU
8 жыл бұрын
Hi Vicious5id, if the goal is ensure machine utilisation is maximised, in this case to continue racing, SMED provides motion economy analysis to identify which non-value adding activities to eliminate as well as relocating the remaining "internal" activities (that originally require the vehicle to be there) to "external" activities that can be prepared for without the vehicle. These methods improve the cycle time of the pit stop ultimately reducing downtime.
@3a146
9 жыл бұрын
Look at how many more crews are needed now...
@doggonemess1
8 жыл бұрын
TWENTY guys, that's just incredible. Why did they have a four person rule in 1950? Also, what a crappy way to attach the wheels. I'm going to have to look up what the heck the mechanic is doing.
Пікірлер: 14