I had a Polaris Quad and it was such a quality vehicle.
@MCGrandMachine576
Ай бұрын
A bit more like harvest water from the specific place it's designed to, still a great inventions nonetheless.
@gretud35679
Ай бұрын
nice
@netwrench6570
Ай бұрын
Couldn't collect dew at 86% humidity? It's working or it failed to produce condensate? Did he misspeak? Sorry, can't watch any more as this seems a little too loose or not enough information. Vexing, not informational.
@HoneyBerighthere-Saysarath
Ай бұрын
Junk
@28russ
Ай бұрын
Geez, please realise that not your whole audience is American and give measurements in imperial and metric, in other words gallons AND litres as well as Fahrenheit AND Celsius. I'm 7:30 in but sorry I can't watch the rest as I don't understand the measurements. 🤷♂
@aislinndeweston4140
Ай бұрын
Water generation machines or atmospheric water machines as they're properly called use 200 W of power per gallon of water. A 5 gallon jug is going to cost you a 1000 W of electric
@alexandrevaliquette3883
Ай бұрын
Can you please provide source of your ignorance? Otherwise, stop educated stupid people on KZitem with this false information. 200W per gallon (so, probably 200W/hour but you ignore proper physic). "Atmospheric water machine' is nothing more than a dehumidifier. Now, check the power consumption of a dehumidifier on Costco and the number of litter of water removed per day. Come back to apologize with the proper number or remove your comment. Oh, and theses device only work efficiently when the relative humidity is high.
Пікірлер: 9