So well spoken, our world needs this message in 2022.
@Photo513Graphy
2 жыл бұрын
My stage of life has brought me to discover Rohr - I am grateful.
@JeanHounsell
Жыл бұрын
I love the simple brown robes...I have been changing from my old dualistic Thinking.....I am so happy..
@maryokane2036
6 жыл бұрын
He is helping me to recover from a bereavement and his attitude is very positive and comforting. That is true.
@moon8rager212
4 жыл бұрын
Makes me happy that you found comfort
@williamfranzesquire5059
6 жыл бұрын
He has a wonderful way of opening up the wider faith. He is generous with his body of knowledge. What is so attractive about his teaching is as he describes. He puts you in touch with what is familiar.
@paulaliberty2082
Жыл бұрын
" we are threatened by otherness" Thank You Father
@celineghiara9674
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you fr. Richard. You brought me closer to our lord Jesus and to the Father. Bless you. Love you.
@JeanHounsell
Жыл бұрын
'He sounds very ignorant'~~~~I am amazed! I have learnt so much since I left my Baptist church for 68 years. And Richard has not stopped opening my mind.
@salrivera835
6 жыл бұрын
Richard Rohr has and is changing my life. Love this man. I been in church almost my whole adult life And it is as he says, all about rules and regulations... Thank u God for REAL TRANSFORMATION
@DocJoby
5 жыл бұрын
Hi Sal, I love Fr. Richard Rohr! I am going to be talking about many of the same topics. Please do me a great kindness and subscribe to my channel KZitem.com/JobyChrist... Thank you, thank you, thank you!
@bobcinq
5 жыл бұрын
Very thought provoking.
@flynvandenbergh4685
6 жыл бұрын
Simply amazing. ❤️🙏🏼😘
@melmontano1152
2 жыл бұрын
I would like to hear more about Father Rohr his Word on U2 everyday how do I join,. I appreciate his message. It bgi es me hope,. M poje
@duncescotus2342
3 жыл бұрын
If this brother is helping you, all well and good, but don't forget the blood of Christ.
@BenErrolDAspera
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks much for posting this. Is it also possible to post or share the succeeding talks of Fr. Rohr in this conference?
@vic38290
3 жыл бұрын
I can't speak the whole truth, which I wish, about Richard Rohr, just as I can never speak the whole truth about God without becoming an idolater. Am I correct? Is this what he meant it to be as I understood him? Please reply.
@mikerochelle4816
6 жыл бұрын
I am learning much from Richards teaching. Did he exemplify dualistic thinking when he talked about the right? Wasn’t that a we are right and they are wrong position he expressed? Love and Peace, in Christ, Mike
@hoover728
6 жыл бұрын
Non-dualistic does not mean a wishy washy world without distinctions or perspectives. There is some irony in what he said about the right, but remember that Jesus, who is the perfect exemplar of nondualism, called the Pharisees hypocrites and a den of vipers. Not to ultimately condemn them but to free them from their limited, deluded perspectives.
@charleskrugger3085
5 жыл бұрын
@@hoover728 Very well said Omega. Blessings and peace.
@fordwayne3833
4 жыл бұрын
Been listening to him for years. It sounds funny the way he always says 'Jezuz' and 'Jejwit', and 'qweyzai' but I can look past that, lol.
@truthclips
6 жыл бұрын
Do you allow all views here? If so, consider that Jesus said false teachers would come...and not to follow them. Is Richard saying that Jesus was wrong for saying that? On what basis? Is this a wrong question? If so, why would you be so dualistic as to call me wrong? Thank you.
@davidmarilley6060
5 жыл бұрын
Why do you think he said "Jesus was wrong"?
@floridalife215
5 жыл бұрын
Go away then
@henrieecen2938
2 жыл бұрын
Can God be fully apprehended? Of course not, for all of us past present and future were are and will be but (using a metaphor) one small grey cell in the mind of God who fills the Universe. However thank God for Jesus Christ, who shows us the characten of God and who we are to follow. Not so much as to imitate, as to be by dying to our old ego self and allow Christ to rise in our most inner being. Please shed our trust in denominational dogmas, and seek the indwelling Christ in whom we have eternal life both now in the present and the new age to come.
@truthclips
2 жыл бұрын
@@henrieecen2938 you blaspheme God and exalt yourself
@henrieecen2938
2 жыл бұрын
We worship God IN whom we move and have our being and worship God in spirit and in truth
@sarabarela4241
5 жыл бұрын
Where does the Holy Spirit come in this? No holy Spirit No Holy ????
@floridalife215
5 жыл бұрын
STFU
@johnpfmcguire
5 жыл бұрын
To me it's very, very funny that we've taken to calling it ❝Vatican II❞, given that 1. There was never a "Council of Rome", ALTHOUGH - a. there was a Council of Constantinople (and Orthodox Christians refer to Constantinople as the "New Rome") - b. it was actually at Constantinople that they actually finalized what we mostly mistakenly call the "Nicene Creed" - c. no Pope of Rome has ever personally attended a single Ecumenical Council, excepting Jerusalem, prior to the 1054 schism. 2. It seems worded to make it sound like the Vatican itself has been rebooted, which according to Australian intellectual giant Hutton Gibson (and most scholars outside the Vatican II "conciliar think tank" - so even secular ones [indistinguishable as they are otherwise]) is of course precisely what happened!
@KMF3
5 жыл бұрын
Why are none of your clergy in your clerics? Is your priesthood not who you are?
@e.d.2292
4 жыл бұрын
Great question. Why is he ashamed of wearing clerical collar/clothes?!
@johnriley5499
6 ай бұрын
Priests are human. In settings like this they seldom wear clerical garb. They are all priests and know they are all priests. Has nothing to do with being "ashamed", although considering the abuses that have been made in the name of clericalism, there would be good reason for shame.
@KMF3
6 ай бұрын
@@johnriley5499 none of the priests that I know in any of the parishes that I go to wear secular clothing.
@summersong2012
5 ай бұрын
“Simple kindness.” Hear and practice it.
@KMF3
5 ай бұрын
@@summersong2012 I'm simply asking a question
@bisserdanev9503
6 жыл бұрын
Can you give us the preach from Tomorrow?
@bernitacenteno1326
4 жыл бұрын
Where is the priests Roman collar? Neither wears it. Why?
@uldisdantche3633
3 жыл бұрын
I believe he is a Munk and not a priest.
@buzzledoux7572
3 жыл бұрын
Uldis Dantche Not a real Priest that's why
@IngridWin
Ай бұрын
Friar @@uldisdantche3633
@judemccarthy4592
5 жыл бұрын
A gathering of old priests still living in the past.
@ThunderBroomPilot
5 жыл бұрын
It appears that the non-dual thinking has risks just like the other thinking. You can hold non-sense ideas just as well as good insights. The trinity thing appears to be a verbal sophistry. My guess is that this concept comes from the ancient Egyptian religion. A good example of non-dual thinking is that you can be and not be. When you look at your picture as a child, you see that you are that person in the picture, but you are also not that person in the picture.
@charlesfrancis1706
6 жыл бұрын
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but [wanting] to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths". 2 Timothy 4:3-4 "Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen". Romans 1:24-25
@e.d.2292
4 жыл бұрын
Wolf, not a shepherd
@chrismichael7987
4 жыл бұрын
This is NOT the biblical, scriptural Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ !!!!
@realperceiver1010
6 жыл бұрын
He sounds very ignorant.
@dustinhellstern7728
5 жыл бұрын
Pat Duffy He sounds ignorant?!? You just revealed your deconstructive, deaf, little Self.
@almilligan7317
5 жыл бұрын
Rohr’s doublespeak and web of tangled thought is very hard to follow unless you have taken the lure. Then he drags you wherever he, with his great knowing mystic mind wants to take you. You are the fish, he is the fisher. In order to do this the first thing he has to do is disavow identity, or the first premise of logic and reasoning A is A. He calls it dualistic thinking but it is really monistic for it must start with a thing is what it is. This of course leads to A not being Not A. That is not dualism. Rohr’s is dualistic thinking because the first thing it does is sets off the spiritual from the material, or the mind/body problem. In this dualism Rohr goes with the Beginning-less Mind and in doing so will eventual deny substitutionary atonement and that Jesus and the Christ are not the same thing, Jesus being the historical man and Christ the incarnation of God in all matter. How does he know all these things? It’s mystical and you can’t understand it unless you enter the mystical mind. Let go! Caught!
@almilligan7317
5 ай бұрын
@@selflesswill Exactly! Rohr has to claim an evolutionary superiority since he is talking about things incomprehensible to us lesser mortals. Another example of his dualistic thinking. But neither Rohr nor you are going anywhere. (Mankind In Amnesia by Immanuel Velikovsky).
@Stereostupid
6 жыл бұрын
Love you Richard!thank you father!
@rodneynewburn545
5 жыл бұрын
he's not your father , is he?
@Paul-qr7hu
Жыл бұрын
Heretical. AUSCP - read what they stand for. This lot needs God's mercy.
Пікірлер: 61