Very interesting! Keep testing! I wonder if the devs will invent some ways to avoid frame dropping in exchange of lowering the resolution/quality. Is this is even possible with this technology?
@ChrisGripeos
6 күн бұрын
I don't own these Box goggles, but I've heard that the HDMI connection on them introduceses a lot of additional latency (compared to when connecting to the HDMI on Fatsharks, Orqas,HDZero goodles)
@owen_is_on_the_internet
6 күн бұрын
@@ChrisGripeos the cobras do have a bit of added latency on the hdmi input compared to other goggles.
@DirtNDrone
22 күн бұрын
Nice testing. I am still waiting for mine to be in the mailbox. Which VRX module do you have?
@owen_is_on_the_internet
22 күн бұрын
@@DirtNDrone I have the Radxa. So far it looks like the WiFi modules you use affect the range, but the processing power of the VRX affects the latency.
@DirtNDrone
21 күн бұрын
@@owen_is_on_the_internet Is Radxa by far the best VRX to be paired with it?
@enochsu7617
21 күн бұрын
Switching between H264/H265 may solve the problem of frame loss.
@darkwingfpv
24 күн бұрын
Fantastic insights!
@Ghost_Of_FPV_1151
23 күн бұрын
Very cool
@enochsu7617
21 күн бұрын
The WiFiLink experience should be a bit better if the code uses H265, the antennas are not crossed and are up as far as possible. 😊
@electronicGRL
24 күн бұрын
One way transmission is really disapointed.
@jimmytheriot8978
21 күн бұрын
The antennas are to be mounted up in the air your killing the signal
@owen_is_on_the_internet
20 күн бұрын
They aren't in the thumbnail, but they are during the flight. I made little slots to pinch them between the hatch and the fuselage. I flew again with nicer antennas and a higher bitrate and it worked much better.
@jimmytheriot8978
20 күн бұрын
@owen_is_on_the_internet what antennas your using now
Пікірлер: 16