Hey guys! I wanted to let you know I just launched an "Insiders" Newsletter where once a week I'm sharing an important lesson I've learned in aviation, links to my latest content so you don't miss out, and links to any other interesting or helpful content I've found. I'm also working on a HUGE project I can't announce yet but I'm going to be sharing more behind the scenes info with Insiders first - Subscribe (it's free) at: airplaneacademy.com/insiders
@craigchips447
2 жыл бұрын
I work at the Cessna plant in Independence ks where this very plane was assembled. I have personally worked on this very aircraft. It is kind of cool to see a plane you have helped get ready for flight on a youtube video.
@tabcreedence6553
2 жыл бұрын
I really like the retro font on the Cessna logo. Has the equipment used for riveting of the panels changed in the last decade or so or done in the same fashion?
@gingerman5123
2 жыл бұрын
@@My_Fair_Lady You sound more like the attention seeker. I think the odds of a person who builds Cessna 182's finding a video of a... wait for it... Cessna 182 would be super high.
@fordmanfinis
2 жыл бұрын
So, any attempts on Johnny Cashs "one piece at a time" song?
@marcusruane7438
2 жыл бұрын
@@gingerman5123 super low but yeah I get wat u mean
@jacklucking691
2 жыл бұрын
Great plane !!!!
@grouchomagic
2 жыл бұрын
I wear my Cessna T-shirt proudly. These planes are so reliable and safe. Great job, Cessna!
@CRTLALTBACKSPACE
6 ай бұрын
And you too can have this aircraft for $495 down $16,900 a month at 12%apr
@hectorherbert6585
Жыл бұрын
a more modern throttle & mixture (center console) commands and controls would have been nice..
@carveking
2 жыл бұрын
I would do anything to own that beautiful plane.
@fecalfetus7902
Жыл бұрын
I love that retro Cessna font on the side
@mikeanderson9266
Жыл бұрын
Did they take off at Fredericksburg TX?
@치킨-n1s
Жыл бұрын
I don’t get why Christiano Ronaldo is flying the cessna
@CaptainCreampie69
Жыл бұрын
I have an ATP and am currently an airline pilot and would love to have an airplane but the thought that these 4 seaters with a naturally aspirated engine goes for $500k brand new, is absurd. These planes haven’t changed other than avionics since the “restarting of the type” in 1996 and was first certified in the mid 50’s. It is super light aluminum and a tight tolerance engine that runs at a constant speed. The airplane in 1958 sold for just under 18k and adjusted for today’s inflation goes for 190k. I understand we have GPS, G1000, etc. and better manufacturing, but that should make it cheaper. Not more expensive. $250k with all the current items in it new and I would have one but the manufacturers are way too proud of their product. In the end, great video and really nice to see what is going on in GA today but it is a big miss for me.
@joshuachittun9109
11 ай бұрын
Agreed
@desmit6
2 жыл бұрын
Derek is obviously a CFI… couldn’t stop himself from saying “Right Rudder”. Lol. Nice video
@motoguzzi7592
2 жыл бұрын
Haha
@HiTechRob
2 жыл бұрын
Something you can almost get away with in a trainer, but when you get into high performance airplanes, your rudder skills (or lack thereof) will become apparent. 🙂
@desmit6
2 жыл бұрын
@@HiTechRob agreed. I hope it was an obvious joke. 👍
@puspitabal2178
2 ай бұрын
Derek looks like Cristiano Ronaldo
@arthurmatthews9321
8 ай бұрын
I learned to fly in a 172 and a week after I got my license my flight school got two 182s . My instructor invited me back to go out in one of the new 182s . We got to level flight and he let me take over. This thing was brand new . It still had plastic covers on the seats. It still had that new aircraft smell.
@livingmodern
7 ай бұрын
I just got mine! Thinking about a 2nd one for the wife and spare for guests.
@NGUSA1
7 ай бұрын
Is this a bragging competition?
@whatta7793
3 ай бұрын
That must have been an awesome school then, or at least a great instructor! Sounds like he was a stand up guy. He probably felt bad that they got the new planes right after your graduation?
@AnthonyHigham6414001080
2 жыл бұрын
Having all those wonderful avionics and self recovering auto pilot is not cheating it's reducing pilot work load. I got my licence on a 152 and did the next 500 odd hours on 172's and then the 172 Cutlass retractable gear for my commercial licence. Flying passengers around the east coast of the states could be hard work and at times very tiring. I absolutely love that aircraft. 1100lbs is just about 500kg; that's a serious load. 145 knots cruise, perfect. The ability to make flap selections and have the AP take care of the trim; luxury. Reduced work load means safer flying and allows the pilot to maintain better situational awareness. What's not to like?
@ska042
2 жыл бұрын
It seems almost bizarre to me that you can have an aircraft with instrument-reliant features like the self recovering autopilot and yet it's NOT certified for actual IFR...?
@flexairz
2 жыл бұрын
Fuel flow?
@ryanwood74
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly, but non pilots have no clue what your talking about but would love to voice their opinions!
@neoretrophoto9198
2 жыл бұрын
@@ska042 the comment was only for the visual approach settings- the IFR approaches are different and the plane is certified for IFR using the IFR approaches. The visual's are not IFR procedures / not for IMC. The visual approaches would help with VFR situational awareness much like foreflight is an assist and not IFR certified. That's my take.
@davecrupel2817
2 жыл бұрын
The costs to maintain and update all those fancy bells & whistles. And the insurance for it all.
@boogerwood
2 жыл бұрын
And how about that price (and waiting list)! Great vid and plane and I'd love to get one but they are all now so priced out of the range for any normal human to buy.
@GasIPass
2 жыл бұрын
I realize this is different take but other than the GPU plug, the Kelly AC and avionics this plane is basically the same as the 1969 182 Skylane, right down to steps on the wing struts and copious aerodynamic impediments. If this aircraft was $150,000 that would be reasonable, but this is like GM selling a 1969 Caprice with a fuel injected motor, airbags and GPS. This is disgraceful.
@sircrapalot9954
2 жыл бұрын
@@GasIPass So, aside from accounting for inflation since 1969 and the exorbitant cost of a G1000 NXI, the 182 has similar useful load, slightly less fuel burn and is 10-20 kts slower than an SR22 , but is half the price.
@GasIPass
2 жыл бұрын
@@sircrapalot9954 in 1980 a brand new 182 cost $17,000. Taking into account inflation that same plane would only cost $60,000 today. If you are happy with the lazy/non-improvement of air frame design since this aircraft was first released in 1956, that’s on you.
@JETZcorp
2 жыл бұрын
@@GasIPass To really be fair in comparing these things to cars, we have to remember that these planes use an ancient ghetto mechanical fuel injection from the 60s and 70s. No car manufacturer would dare sell an engine with zero-feedback Bosch K-Jetronic dribble system where just going over a mountain pass requires manual tuning by the driver. But getting something new certified and STCs available is so expensive it's basically illegal, so we're all frozen in time.
@prodigalpilot
2 жыл бұрын
@@GasIPass you are quoting the original MSRP from 1957, not 1980. Adjusted for inflation, the 1980 price is roughly $200k. Still a far cry from the price today, but the airplane is also far more capable in terms of mission, avionics and autopilot. It’s a numbers game, numbers are too low to bring down prices, but we can’t bring down the price in order to get the volume up. Tough world.
@azcoyote007
2 жыл бұрын
This review was great right up until the point he told you to adjust the mixture. Just WTF. 2022 and FADEC still isn’t the standard. A $600,000 plane with 1950 engine technology. I realize a number of people will say managing mixture is no big deal but technology should be reducing Pilot workload. Pilots have to wear many hats. Pilot. Engineer. Navigator. Removing the need to manage the engine that much needs to happen now. Let the pilot have to worry about one less thing.
@21AirDrop
2 жыл бұрын
Totally agree.
@fli9614
2 жыл бұрын
Completely agree. It's just ridiculous.
@NavyGuy2OO7
2 жыл бұрын
Right, for as much as these airplanes cost new it should manage the RPM and mixture automatically by now.
@justinhaase8825
2 жыл бұрын
The planes now come with an insurance policy dedicated to each individual aircraft…no joke. Aviation should be cheaper…not more expensive today…but here we are.
@stuartclough915
2 жыл бұрын
And presumably still running exclusively on leaded fuel. Do we really have to dump toxic residue on people living under flightpaths?
@jeffannis549BJ
2 жыл бұрын
If you ever get to buy a new Cessna the delivery process is unimaginable. 4 days of fun in the air with your brand new bird and the best of everything. I bought a new T206H and took delivery in June. You will know your way around Wichita when you finally depart on day 5. Eat lunch at Steerman airport……at least one of the flying days.
@redblade8160
2 жыл бұрын
Jeff. Who cares about you?
@everettfarr8036
11 ай бұрын
Im getting ready to purchase a new 182. Delivery in 2025. I'm excited
@16B9
Жыл бұрын
Back in the early 1970s I was a young paratrooper stationed at Fort Campbell Kentucky. We had a sport parachute club for off duty jumping. On the weekends we would drive to Elkton Kentucky and meet up with a pilot that had a Cessna 182. He would take off the right door and remove the front seat and rear seats. We could fit three parachutists in the plane and away we would go off the grass airstrip. As soon as we started our free fall jumping the local residents would show up and watch use jump the whole afternoon. I have fond memories of jumping out of that Cessna 182. I'm glad they are still making them. It was a fun time for all.
@iflyuwalk
2 жыл бұрын
You don't trim during the flare, period. Fly a balked landing and find out exactly how devout you are. Any airplane that can't be flared properly by application of yoke/stick/whatever alone is poorly designed. The 182 is obviously _not_ poorly designed so trimming is absolutely not necessary. Nice ride, though.
@fernandobaiget755
2 жыл бұрын
You are 100% right!
@xfirehurican
2 жыл бұрын
Keerect!
@georgetrue6660
2 жыл бұрын
Actually, the 182 did tend to be a little nose-heavy in the flare, which required a small amount of extra vigilance so as not to accidently plant it on the nose gear. I assumed the weight of the A/C unit just forward of the empennage would have eliminated that in this new 182, but apparently not.
@TheSithTeacher
5 ай бұрын
and it will cost you a fortune 😅
@leer3286
2 жыл бұрын
Common people can no longer afford this hobby, only the rich. I have my PPL, but can’t afford to rent a 152 anymore, much less own one. Around 1995, I could rent a 152 for $37.50/hr wet. Piper warrior was $45/hr wet. Now it’s 4 times that or more, I have not checked in years, it is probable worse now. Pilot shortage? LOL 😂
@blake9908
2 жыл бұрын
Im paying $159 wet for a PA-28-181
@RickJohnson
2 жыл бұрын
When I learned in 2008, a 152 was $68/hr wet, and an older 172 $88/hr wet. I miss those days, and don't fly for similar reasons - cost. My family also grew and renting a 6-place aircraft was prohibitively expensive!
@KyleKatarn145
2 жыл бұрын
The pilot community on youtube is something I love watching, though I definitely don't earn near enough money to be able to start on this journey myself, so it's just nice to watch.
@jamesburns2232
2 жыл бұрын
You don't need money to be able to fly, just someone who will let you sit in the pilot seat and do it. 😉
@Hughes500
2 жыл бұрын
Me to.
@hariranormal5584
2 жыл бұрын
I had an friend, totally I.T based, I was amazed when he said he was training for a license etc, it honestly doesn't seem so difficult. You can definitely plan for this if you really wanna fly. You don't need to own these planes for flying them :v
@dabneyoffermein595
2 жыл бұрын
you can get a loan between multiple people and do a sharing ownership, that would put you in a brand new 182, and you could split the annual maintenance costs. I would like someone to let us know what the annual maintenance inspection costs on a 2022 Cessna 182 (Textron) in 2023? Thanks for helping
@rogerdickinson920
2 жыл бұрын
I remember back in the day when a 150 cost 16 or 18 an hr, 172 was 21 and the 182 was 23 including gas. Those were the days when ww2 pilots were instructors costing 10$ hr. One was a Mosquito pilot, another flew Vulcans and a third water bombers. I had some pretty good instructors.
@flyinginak4824
2 жыл бұрын
When was this?
@pumpman0698
2 жыл бұрын
Now cost me £210 for an hour in a 152 yesterday
@chekyerego
2 жыл бұрын
Those prices are about what I paid back in 1981. I think a brand new 152 cost about 40 k back then. This thing has got to be about 500k
@rogerdickinson920
2 жыл бұрын
@@chekyerego There is a vid out there recently where the new cost of a 172 was 487k US,,,I think
@rogerdickinson920
2 жыл бұрын
@@flyinginak4824 1976 to mid 80;s
@carlfichtner8148
2 жыл бұрын
Great video ! Great plane ! Great paint scheme ! Great everything about this plane !
@redblade8160
2 жыл бұрын
Carl... But you don't sound great, just repetitive and boring!
@carlfichtner8148
2 жыл бұрын
@@redblade8160 Have a great day !👍🤣
@redblade8160
2 жыл бұрын
@@carlfichtner8148 There you go again!
@r.a.monigold9789
2 жыл бұрын
FSF - Full Self Flying. Literally AutoPilot. This is fantastic. A seasoned, knowledgeable and unable to be distracted, electronic co-pilot ready to take over when needed. And Flight Plans by touch screen - also fantastic. Cessna has made hobby flying fun, safe and relaxing. Thank you both for sharing...
@conantheagrarian
Жыл бұрын
My comments are full self typing, literally my brain on autopilot
@glennmullis1477
2 жыл бұрын
What an amazingly well done video! Great job to you both. This airplane is very VERY nicely done, and I absolutely love the retro '60s paint job on this version. I so much enjoy your videos!
@AirplaneAcademy
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! Glad you enjoyed!
@helios1912
Жыл бұрын
@@AirplaneAcademy Yes--There has to be a sizable demographic that prefers this retro font and paint. i love it. Also, sounds like Cessna has really worked on less NVH. Noise/Vibration/Harshness.
@thedudegamezzz
2 жыл бұрын
When they talk about the fuel range I started laughing cause the plane looked parked but it was just so stable in the air. Awesome plane
@topg6531
2 жыл бұрын
0:07 dude looks like Ronaldo
@joshuapatrick682
8 ай бұрын
I am a big fan of the auto correction for extended bank angles. Cant help but think such a feature would save a lot of lives over the years.
@chad1755
3 ай бұрын
As long as you can turn it off its ok I guess. I'm left wondering -- if the plane has such an advanced autopilot as this one, and you're not proficient on instruments and go inadvertent IMC -- why would you continue to hand-fly the airplane? Just activate the autopilot -- which kind of turns this feature into a useless gimmick doesn't it? Either let the autopilot fly the airplane, or don't. This half/half thing seems kind of pointless.
@johnninokleinvaldez1595
Жыл бұрын
So no one's gonna talk about how the instructor looked like Ronaldo
@PJHEATERMAN
2 жыл бұрын
We had a company owned 182 with cuffed leading edges. I loved practicing 50 knot approaches with a high sink rate at a higher than normal approach. Great for night time operation as inexperienced pilots can make lower than normal approaches at night. Also a good economical workhorse.
@kentuckyblugrass
2 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love the throwback vintage paint scheme and font. Such an iconic plane.
@BobbyGeneric145
Жыл бұрын
That retro paint and logo is AWESOME
@mtkoslowski
2 жыл бұрын
Salesman’s favorite word is ‘really.’ Yes, really.
@CJ.A-C
4 ай бұрын
how much is this plane
@Bitcoinistheshit
3 ай бұрын
Ever hear of google ?
@tamerlachauve5164
Ай бұрын
Google is your friend
@GasIPass
2 жыл бұрын
Other than the GPU plug, the Kelly AC and avionics this plane is basically the same as the 1969 182 Skylane, right down to steps on the wing struts and copious aerodynamic impediments. If this aircraft was $150,000 that would be reasonable, but this is like GM selling a 1969 Caprice with a fuel injected motor, airbags and GPS. This is disgraceful.
@johnrezzonico1139
2 жыл бұрын
Funny, I am selling a 1969 182M when my 2022 arrives in September. This is a great airplane and something I am excited to put my family in...
@xthanman
2 жыл бұрын
Touch button activated air conditioning?? In a cessna 182? hahahahah
@gulfstream7235
2 жыл бұрын
As my old boss used to say " If it F**ks ,Flies or Floats, you're better off renting "....
@bubbacole1657
2 жыл бұрын
I've never owned a plane, don't have the fund's to do so, but love watching the videos. This 182 would be a awesome choice to have..
@jamesburris4078
2 жыл бұрын
I'm guessing that aircraft is probably $250k? With that setup... It has certainly grown out of a hobbyists grasp.
@bubbacole1657
2 жыл бұрын
@@jamesburris4078 Hell, I can't afford the fuel to fly the thing, maybe drive it around the airport a time or two.. HAHA
@jamesburris4078
2 жыл бұрын
@@bubbacole1657 I wasn't even close to what 1 actually cost. $500k +... And that is not with all the bells and whistles.
@bubbacole1657
2 жыл бұрын
@@jamesburris4078 DAM,, Guess I won't be buying one anytime soon. Crazy Cost for a bunch of aluminum
@nunyabidness3075
2 жыл бұрын
@@bubbacole1657 Look into your local EAA chapter scene. There may be some budget builders in your area. Another option is taking a ground school course. It’s cheap. If you really want to fly on weekends, you can figure it out. Owning is expensive. You can get paid to fly.
@wilfredosoto2722
2 жыл бұрын
I’m a member of the Civil Air Patrol and we have the world’s largest fleet of single engine Cessnas and our 172’s/182’s are being equipped or come with the G1000, which is great and a huge help for our missions, but this new 182 just blows my mind. Can’t wait to see if we’re going to get any of the new 182’s in our Wings in the near future.
@FamilyManMoving
2 жыл бұрын
My daughter joined CAP a year ago to get a feel for military service, without any thoughts of flying. THEN, she did a weekend deployment where she got stick time on a glider. Done, and done. She is going to be a pilot, whether as a vocation or as a PPL. CAP is great for type-A all-star performers, and creating leaders. Thanks and keep up the good work.
@duck_rifle5879
2 жыл бұрын
We are primarily flying G1Ks in VAWG. We took delivery of a 172NXi last year. Very cool flight deck.
@gcorriveau6864
2 ай бұрын
A 'sweet ride.' But (yes, I'm Old School!!!) all the buttons and electronics are a new kind of safety hazard that many pilots might not fully realize at first. On the airliners we have two pilots to help share this workload - and there's a good reason for this - these devices require focused attention and can be 'fatally distracting'). The second 'new danger' this tech presents is the loss of our hand-flying skills. Pilots using automation constantly will most likely underestimate how badly their own manual skills have deteriorated until they need them most! yikes! But, that all aside - as I said - a sweet ride (HINT make sure the carbon based unit is always in control of the silicon based units.)
@danl.909
2 жыл бұрын
I had a 2006 turbo 182 before I lost my medical. Best airplane I ever owned. It would do 155 KTAS at 12,500’, running lean of peak at about 12 GPH with Gamijectors (if I remember correctly; that was 10 years ago). It would fly circles at 70 kts over sites my passengers wanted to photograph, steady as a rock. It was indeed a great short field airplane. I could easily land and make the first exit taxiway at my airport every time, just to show off. It would true 170 KTS at 17,500’, though I almost never took it that high unless there was a screaming tailwind. I loved that airplane. The new one in this video almost brings tears to my eyes. I envy anyone who can get himself one.
@stancotton4778
2 жыл бұрын
We don't use VFR altitudes above FL180...I really hope you meant 17,500. If you were flying at 18,500, sure hope you had an ATC assigned altitude of FL180 block FL190.
@danl.909
2 жыл бұрын
@@stancotton4778 What??
@stancotton4778
2 жыл бұрын
@@danl.909 Did you really fly at 18,500 or is that a guess?
@danl.909
2 жыл бұрын
@@stancotton4778 I never flew at 18,500 in my life. A guess? What are you talking about?
@stancotton4778
2 жыл бұрын
@@danl.909 You stated that your airplane would true out at 170kts at 18,500. And that you ALMOST NEVER took it that high unless there was a screaming tailwind. Those are your words... so now you're are saying you NEVER took it that high. I was only questioning whether you knew that FL180 and above is class A airspace, formerly known as PCA...Positive Controlled Airspace, requiring an IFR assigned altitude by ATC.
@roadcyclist1
Жыл бұрын
This plane seems underwhelming. For a 2022 plane, I would liked to have seen more updated avionics. I understand this is marketed towards low budget, novice pilots....but common.
@anthonycyr9657
2 жыл бұрын
Love the old school paint job, my favorite airplane, but over 750,000 for a new 182? absolute insanity, cant see the type lasting much longer at that price, cessna will price it out of the market like they did with the ttx240..
@adamyoung8906
2 жыл бұрын
Agree... what could the market for this plane possibly be? You'd be better off buying a Sling TSI and two Bentleys, one for each leg of your trip to the airport.
@Heathfx5
2 жыл бұрын
Everything about certificated aircraft is out of control, price-wise. The only way for a mere mortal to get into a new plane is for them to build it themselves. Avgas has a lot of enemies in the environmental/political space and aerodiesel engine options are far and few between, leaving experimental+automotive diesels as the only option for an affordable plane that burns affordable fuel.
@rogerdickinson920
2 жыл бұрын
Flying schools, they are easy to fly.
@adamyoung8906
2 жыл бұрын
@@rogerdickinson920 I thought that's what the Skyhawk was for? I don't doubt it's an incredible aircraft and it's not even really Cessna's fault they have to charge this much. I'm just bummed new planes went from accessible for the top 5% of incomes to the top 0.5%.
@anthonycyr9657
2 жыл бұрын
@@rogerdickinson920 Flying schools wouldnt buy a 182, especially when the 172 is the most popular trainer out there, but still over 500 thousand a copy.
@additive8924
2 жыл бұрын
I'm liking the Cessna representative here. I did work as a Salesman for a little while( I decided it wasn't for me). Between my experience in and as a consumer I've realized there are two kinds of salesmen. The typical " greasy used car salesman" type, and the one that actually believes in the product. He seems like he really believes in the product and genuinely wants people to enjoy it as much as he does. It's going to be quite a while before I can afford my own plane, but I'm gonna have to ask to talk to him when I start looking at what Cessna has to offer.
@conantheagrarian
Жыл бұрын
If you listen attentively you’ll hear say The tio540 is 235 hp which is wrong. It’s 310hp not 235 so yes I agree with you …yup he’s GREAT and also gay as hell good rep for “the times”
@philiporourke7896
8 ай бұрын
He' very handsome.
@mouthbreather280
7 ай бұрын
He’s gay
@captainbuck5969
Жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention that 98 percent of the public can’t afford this plane.
@Chris_at_Home
8 ай бұрын
I bought a good used plane that was a 2 seat taildragger in 1984 for $9,000 which was a few months income in the oil field then.
@dbsmith975
13 күн бұрын
98% of the public aren’t capable of flying this airplane.
@dbsmith975
13 күн бұрын
@@Chris_at_Home agree, we all did. Those days are over.
@Harryjmacneil
2 жыл бұрын
I jumped many time out of a 182 back in the 70’s. Owned a 170B. Great planes! ♥️
@BIBIWCICC
2 жыл бұрын
Such an aerodynamically dated aeroplane. Why isn’t Cessna making and designing new aircraft?
@landocycle
Жыл бұрын
Wow, the designers really went all out on this one! That black stripe was not in the same spot as the 1960s version. We’re making ground!
@joedoakes8307
2 жыл бұрын
Does the 182 come equipped with an Automatic fart sucker ?
@flyingpanhandle
2 жыл бұрын
Would love the hear an actual review of this, feels more like a sales pitch. Nice plane all the same.
@TheBarzook
2 жыл бұрын
Especially done by a 182 guy! You can tell he's sold on it even before going in! Can't blame him though I would do the same!
@suzukirider9030
2 жыл бұрын
Flown different 182 Cessnas a few times. Most recently it was $215 / hour, 12.5 gph, and only 122 kt GS at 2'400 RPM with throttle firewalled at 10'500. Now, okay the IO-540 powered ones with wheel fairings may be faster. A bit. Maybe 130 kt GS. Okay-ish as a rental. Wouldn't purchase a new one today. So many much better aircraft in 2022 Faster, more efficient gas-wise, MUCH better view. Much easier to fly. Alas, struggling to get market traction because 80% of disposable income in the U.S. comes from 60+ year old who are set in their ways. Also because many newer people in aviation are heavily biased towards "tried and true" designs, even if it's 60+ years old, and inefficient as f_ck. Seriously though.
@joem8615
2 жыл бұрын
I have a 2021 Cessna 182T, what would you like to know?
@suzukirider9030
2 жыл бұрын
@@joem8615 Which aircraft did you consider before purchasing it, and why did you end up getting a 182T ?
@TheBarzook
2 жыл бұрын
@@joem8615 Wow a 2021! Is the 2021 equipped with the same features than the 2022? I'm mostly interested in the performance figures like cruise speed, rpm, fuel burn, MP, etc. Some climb performance data too. 1100 lbs of payload is not a whole lot but the 200 lbs rear baggage capacity is very impressive. How does it fly with 200 lbs in the back?
@edmoore3910
2 жыл бұрын
How can over 700,000 be justified?
@monsenrm
2 жыл бұрын
Hmm…nice but a very expensive version of my 1969 182M. I also have 265hp Pponk conversion. I am just finishing a avionics upgrade that basically gives all the same features as this one.
@cryhavoc38
2 жыл бұрын
200lb baggage limit...so about 1 of my wife's suitcases when we go on trips.
@alansimpson596
2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful aircraft. I learned to fly on the Cessna 150 and 172. I found that the Cessna wing was so efficient that sometimes I had trouble getting it to settle on the runway on landing.
@Suncast45
2 жыл бұрын
Me to! Earned my PPL in June 1967 and entered the Air Force one month later and sent to Viet Nam one year later as a security cop! :-(
@chad1755
3 ай бұрын
Getting the plane to settle has nothing to do with the wing design -- it's all about speed management. If you're floating during the flare, you've got too much speed.
@Foxtrot1967
Жыл бұрын
Government, greed and over regulations for profits and fuel cost has made it impossible for an average person to own and fly even the oldest single engine aircraft's.
@golfbravowhiskey8669
2 жыл бұрын
Nice. Where’s mindy😀.
@robschmieg6211
2 жыл бұрын
Schmiiiiindy lol
@PavewayJDAM
2 жыл бұрын
Because flush rivets are only for... warbirds? Its 2022!?
@Reacta-dev
2 жыл бұрын
This is Awsome! The 182 is my favorite plane! I am 13 and just did my first Discovery flight, hope to own one of these in the future!
@zackriden79
2 жыл бұрын
better start saving your peenys there is drug king pins that can not afford one
@lancepeltier1081
2 жыл бұрын
Don't wait any longer than you have to kid. I put off getting a pilot's license and then I had to work, I got married and had kids and never did get it. Now I'm in my 50's watching other people fly on KZitem videos.
@Reacta-dev
2 жыл бұрын
@@lancepeltier1081 Thanks! I am trying to convince my mom to let me, I really want to!
@ljthirtyfiver
2 жыл бұрын
@@Reacta-dev yea what Lance said …I waited til age 26 which wasn’t bad but I knew I wanted to fly since your age. I say that to say the journey is been rough and because I waited long I almost didn’t finish. So get on it soon as your 15/16 make it your goal to have your ppl at or before 20
@william38022
Жыл бұрын
So with the turbo charged option here you’re looking at what 200 mph???
@HiTechRob
2 жыл бұрын
Totally dig the vintage paint scheme! I have a 1979 Piper Dakota I did major flight deck upgrade - all Aspen Avionics PFD/MFD and Garmin flight deck, but I kept my retro paint scheme. I have 235 hp and 1,150 lbs of useful load. Love it!!
@ebouwman034
2 жыл бұрын
I’ve been out of aviation for a while. I didn’t realize this was “vintage”, I just thought they never changed.
@aaronbrown6266
2 жыл бұрын
I think I prefer the Dakota. Very stable airframe.
@alexkram
2 жыл бұрын
Why wouldn't they update the look since the 1950's? Could you imagine buying a car today that looked just like the 1950's version but with the full 2022 price? I realize it has EFI and AC now but so does any car from 30 years ago. You can't tell me that with all of the CFD software advances since the 1950's Cessna couldn't make significant improvements to the aerodynamics by changing the shape. Garmin made the avionics, Lycoming made the EFI, what have the Cessna engineers been doing?
@TravelingStacker
2 жыл бұрын
Because it doesn't need it. They have made slight improvements over the years. But they are sticking to a main design that was built right the first time.
@MD-sj2dn
2 жыл бұрын
Cool dude, always teaching and adjusting the mixture just like my CFI always did.
@fudogwhisperer3590
2 жыл бұрын
In the pattern, I just push my mixture full forward. Since there is a mixture control, am I to assume there is no FADEC on this aircraft?
@petesmith9472
2 жыл бұрын
For the amount of time you fly alone, then occasionally with another on board .. few aircraft beat the RV8…165kts @ 33 litres…constant speed when fitted…with Flymore tip tanks 6.5 hours endurance. More baggage than you can ever need.
@droge192
2 жыл бұрын
Far too exciting and radical for a conservative 182 flyer!
@Heathfx5
2 жыл бұрын
High wings aren’t sexy, but if you are fat and out of shape or have bad joints, they sure are a lot easier to get in and out of.
@docholiday7758
2 жыл бұрын
@@droge192 Planes fly as you fly them. If all you want is a cruiser, the RV-8 will dutifully obey your commands. The RV-8 is hard to beat.
@JoeyBlogs007
4 ай бұрын
An extra plug in seat option for the backage area could be useful.
@ryanwood74
2 жыл бұрын
It’s amazing how far aviation has come with electronics. I started in 1997 steam gauge Piper Cadet with no GPS and to be honest, it wasn’t all that fun. How people can navigate to a non VOR airport in ND back then with no GPS is beyond me!
@jbw9999
2 жыл бұрын
I started in 1990. Learning how to navigate without all the electronics doing it for you really helped with situational awareness. If those navi systems failed on a newer pilot today, I'm not sure if they could manage without getting lost.
@Micg51
2 жыл бұрын
Yet still ancient engine technology. Avionics are a game changer though.
@ryanwood74
2 жыл бұрын
It’s really important to to train pilots without the use of GPS, just in case all the satellites fall out of the sky!
@coriscotupi
Жыл бұрын
Back in the day (80s) I'd do cross-country VFR with no VOR, no ADF, no GPS of course, and depending n the specific airplane, not even a VHF com radio. All we had was a WAC chart, the compass and a watch. Today this would be considered borderline dangerous hard-core VFR, but then it was the bread-and-butter of flying small aircraft. And it was fun!
@greglewis572
2 жыл бұрын
The C182's are historically nose heavy in the flair. However, you should Not teach to run electric trim during your flare.
@cinemantics231
Жыл бұрын
This is probably the most perfect plane that exists. Can take it almost anywhere and it'll handle the ride with stride. I only hope Cessna considers adding the Lycoming 540 ie2 engine to it and give it something north of 300 hp of power. I'd wager it will woo quite a few Cirrus buyers away.
@mmm0513
Жыл бұрын
agree
@chad1755
3 ай бұрын
I'd take a 206 over a 182 any day of the week. Just as easy to fly, and more capable in every way.
@ak9079
2 жыл бұрын
Nothing has changed with this plane for the last 40 years except the g1000
@cptairwolf
2 жыл бұрын
It's amazing just how little the Cessna has changed. I suppose it's hard to improve on such an iconic design though I would like to see nicer interior design (more akin to modern cars). I mean if I can get a fully equipped Audi S4 for under 50 grand, surely a Cessna 182 can look just as nice inside for the price it's sold.
@kalleblom5564
2 жыл бұрын
what is the price?
@s1ipzys661
2 жыл бұрын
@@kalleblom5564 300k
@s1ipzys661
2 жыл бұрын
@@kalleblom5564 that one u just saw is 750k 🙁😞😢
@Jaypilot100
2 жыл бұрын
I would like to see flush rivets and other speed improvements.
@davidtalbott8817
8 ай бұрын
Fredricksburg,TX, airport!! I've been there! Spent a long time working there!
@rockymountain5-speed719
2 жыл бұрын
All throughout my childhood I had real at home simulators with all the controls, rudder pedals. The 172 was my absolute favorite to fly. Super forgiving airplane. I just recently started playing the simulators again and it's like I never stopped flying even though it's been 15 years since I last been on a simulator.
@robertmetzger6467
2 жыл бұрын
Just like Riding a Bike ! 😄😀😃
@thepianoman1010
2 жыл бұрын
Steep turns were a requirement in the GFT back in 1975/6 .... and they were at 60 degrees ... I believe that nowadays this is a max of 45 degrees .. could be wrong?
@llwellyn1
2 жыл бұрын
You and Derek did a great job showcasing this aircraft. I appreciate the high level of detail in this review and the overall production quality of your channel. I see that the C182 has rudder trim but does the GFC700 have a yaw damper function? Cheers!
@gregmanning8967
2 жыл бұрын
The GFC700 is YD capable. I can't find any literature that says whether or not it's utilized in the Skylane but I would be surprised if it wasn't.
@AirplaneAcademy
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This was a fun video to produce. It took a lot of work but I'm really happy with the result. It was fun to be able to showcase this awesome airplane for everyone so that more people could be exposed to aviation.
@lsx_moe
2 жыл бұрын
It’s a nice plane but I could buy 2 da40’s for that price
@HiTechRob
2 жыл бұрын
None of it cheating... it helps reduce workload. Althrough I do like to practice flying approaches by hand as well to stay fresh, trim, pitch, and power settings... The C182 is such a great plane. Great job on the video.
@markadams7328
2 жыл бұрын
The problem is - when pilots 'cheat' too much, they can't fly the plane.
@HiTechRob
2 жыл бұрын
@@markadams7328 Yeah, don’t disagree with you at all. It’s why I make it a common practice to fly several approaches by hand within the same six-month requirement period and not just rely on automation.
@Foxtrot1967
Жыл бұрын
Buying a new plane is a waste of money. Buy used and invest the saved money on avionics and engine
@jtharmon12
2 жыл бұрын
I have been flying a 2017 182T (not turbo) for a few years. The NXI and G700 spoils you... and yes, the IO-540 at 2400 rpm just is so quiet and it takes a LOT of stress off longer journeys
@chad1755
3 ай бұрын
At the beginning of my career I started off flying cargo in a Cherokee Six (IO-540), and then did a bunch of time in a 206 (IO-520). The 520 was ear-pounding -- its what prompted me to upgrade from my old Davie-Clarks to the Bose A20, which had just come out. But I don't know if I'd call them quiet -- I also remember the Navajo with twin IO-540s being loud as well...
@reodds
2 жыл бұрын
Been flying since 1976. Don't know how "normal" people can afford to fly these days, let alone buy a new 182...
@aaronbrown6266
2 жыл бұрын
We can't. I got my PPL in October 2021. I have flown three times since. Last flight was in a Warrior from Phoenix to Lake Havasu City for lunch to celebrate my wife's birthday. That was a $700 day. Fuel cost has priced me out. I'm hoping to get back in soon.
@jerrylittle7797
2 жыл бұрын
Great video Charlie! Really enjoyed your presentation of the features of the new 182.
@AirplaneAcademy
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! Glad you enjoyed!
@glenn3379
2 жыл бұрын
flaring on the trim?? probably one of the worst "techniques" I have ever heard. Do a low speed go-around and let us know how you go. New players, DONT DO THAT!
@fingerhorn4
2 жыл бұрын
Agreed. So many pitfalls to flaring with up trim. If you need a go around you are priming your self for a balloon take off, rapid nose high and if you still have a notch or two of flaps you are asking for a stall.
@thebadgerpilot
2 жыл бұрын
To each their own, but if you trim in the flare and have to go around, it's a recipe for disaster if you're not proficient in go arounds. I fly a nose-heavy 235 and I just keep a touch of power in until touchdown for normal landings
@MichaelLloyd
2 жыл бұрын
Same
@ljthirtyfiver
2 жыл бұрын
I do it but I’m of the philosophy that if you need to go around by the time of the flare you messed up several hundred feet (distance and altitude ) ago Doesn’t mean don’t do it but even most turbine jets won’t allow you time to recover if you initiated a go around that late in the game.
@thatguy8005
2 жыл бұрын
Yea… if you get lost with a G1000… wow… you shouldn’t fly.
@kim.in.nature.
2 жыл бұрын
My Dad started with a 172, then upgraded to a 182. He just got his multi engine rating when he developed Afib and was grounded. Broke his heart, but he sure had fun flying all his friends to cool destinations, including me !
@9HighFlyer9
2 жыл бұрын
I feel your Dad's pain as I had also had a medical grounding way too young. I started flying a 172R then moved up to the 172S after I soloed just for the extra 20HP which was helpful in Phoenix's heat. Day after my checkride I got into a '99 182S and never looked back until I started having episodes of lightheadedness. Grounded before I started my multi but was 75% through my IFR. Interesting fact; that 182 had a new sticker price of right around $230,000 and rented for $115/hr. The biggest bargain anywhere. My kids never got to know me when I flew so it's just an oddity when someone is digging through a closet and finds my flight bag.
@poochie5543
Жыл бұрын
@@9HighFlyer9 that’s weird, I contacted a Cessna representative and they said a new Cessna Skyhawks costed $499,999. With what you do, how much money do you assume you need to own a plane, something even basic as a Cessna 150.
@9HighFlyer9
Жыл бұрын
@@poochie5543 Now they cost half a million $. But in 1999 they were $135,000. There's an article, from 1997, on Avweb if you search for it. Discusses the price and if they're too high.
@poochie5543
Жыл бұрын
@@9HighFlyer9 I did the math, that 135k is actually more than 500k in todays money due to inflation.
@poochie5543
Жыл бұрын
@@9HighFlyer9 in reality which is surprising, it’s actually cheaper to buy a plane today than before during 80’s. I know I’m still new and working for my ppl at 18, i hope I can get a tour at one of Cessnas dealership on what they have in person, very fascinating non the less.
@JohnVKaravitis
2 жыл бұрын
This guy flies? He'd be able to take on more luggage IF HE'D BOTHER LOSING SOME WEIGHT!!!
@TravelingStacker
2 жыл бұрын
Well some people like flying and their weight doesn't matter. You just worry about reviewing beer and other nonsense on your channel.
@ThomasGrillo
2 жыл бұрын
I'm legally blind, so I can't fly real aircraft, but I'm seeing this instrumentation in the aircraft in Flight Simulator 2020, and X-Plane sims. I only wish the G1000 had a soft key that would enlarge the instrumentation. For real world pilots, I think this would help, especially in the event of a smoke filled cabin, or other emergency that impairs a pilot's vision. Thanks for sharing.
@rogerdickinson920
2 жыл бұрын
@ThomasGrillo Pay some low time pilot to take you up. Pay for the plane and he or she racks up left seat time
@blake9908
2 жыл бұрын
Thomas Grillo, is your vision correctable with glasses or contacts to 20/20?
@ThomasGrillo
2 жыл бұрын
@@blake9908 No. WITH glasses, my right eye is 20/500, WITH glasses, the left eye is 20/2000. Field of vision is less than 25 degrees vertically, in both eyes, and about 40 degrees, laterally, in right, about the same in the left. Also, there's astigmatism (distortion), as well as nystagmus (jittery eyes) in both eyes. Nope. No pilot's licenses in my near future. LOL
@MacNmey
2 жыл бұрын
So, all you need now is close to 600K and you can have one!
@droge192
2 жыл бұрын
Insanely overpriced for it's class and 230hp power. The problem is that the "2022 C182" is still 90% the same technology as the "1965 C182". Avionics aside, this is ancient technology and cannot compete with modern Jet A TDi engined modern aircraft. Cessna will die of conservatism one day. No innovation whatsoever.
@philconey11
2 жыл бұрын
This isn't a product they're trying to innovate with. That's what the TTX, SkyCourier and Citation series aircraft are for. Plenty of innovation in those models. Especially with select TTX models having electronic ignition and computerized injection/fuel management systems. This is an aircraft that's tried and true, produced in sufficient numbers with sufficient aftermarket support to reduce cost of ownership. Technology from 1965 is fine, sometimes. This is one of those situations where it's okay.
@wallyballou7417
2 жыл бұрын
@@philconey11 Electronic ignition? Computerized fuel injection? Those are the devil's tools! I'll stick with magnetos and carburetors. And get off my lawn!
@markherrington9422
2 жыл бұрын
2 garmin 3x would be much better
@Brave_Aviator
2 жыл бұрын
Oh wow this plane looks amazing for a first airplane. If i have enough money in the future I want to maybe own one of these planes :) I just completed my first solo flight on June 2nd, 2022 which is a huge confidence builder for me to continue my training and I hope to be a commercial pilot for a career!
@suzukirider9030
2 жыл бұрын
Don't buy a 182. Learn to fly 172/182 'cause they are available for rent everywhere. And arguably better than the whole Piper family. But to purchase - do yourself a favor and go for some newer designs.
@RedHawk785
2 жыл бұрын
Your timing is immaculate. Prospects have never been better.
@chevyon37s
2 жыл бұрын
Those AC vents look like the stole the cheap ass vents out of a Jeep Wrangler. For the price of this plane, the little things like that shouldn’t be skimped on.
@calsurflance5598
2 жыл бұрын
As a Jeep Wrangler owner, I resent that! 😂
@dougmccloud3703
2 жыл бұрын
Using electric trim on flare sounds dangerous to me in the event of having to go around. Am I wrong? Been a lot of accidents lately on go arounds done wrong. Theory has been too much UP trim on landing and making it stall due to not enough forward pressure on the yoke during the go around.
@glenn3379
2 жыл бұрын
I just saw your comment after I posted... you are spot on.
@douglaswhite8688
2 жыл бұрын
I agree, trim for the approach to meet stabilized standards, then no more trim. Not a good habit to get into.
@cwhitty05
2 жыл бұрын
In my opinion, that depends on the pilot’s proficiency and level of training. If the pilot does have to go around in the flare, the worst thing he can do is stiff arm the throttle. The prop wash will make the elevator more effective and cause the nose to come up abruptly, while at the same time P factor, torque, and spiraling slipstream are yanking the nose to the left. Not good. Full flaps is also an issue. However, if the pilot was trimming in the flare using the electric trim, he likely didn’t add that much nose up trim because the trim doesn’t move that fast. If a go-around is necessary, it would be better to add about 50% power initially, with coordinated right rudder, reach over and raise the flaps one notch, then bring in some more power, using electric trim as needed and eventually getting to full throttle and flaps up or 10°, and a smooth safe go around is the result. No need to rush it.
@CaptVII
2 жыл бұрын
@@cwhitty05 Did you watch the end of the video? The sales guy said he likes to reach the full aft limit of the trim at touchdown. Makes me wonder if he’s ever done a last second go-around. But I dont know the 182 well enough. Maybe the trim limits aren’t that drastic?
@blake9908
2 жыл бұрын
@@CaptVII Same, i haven't flown the 182, but the nose is heavy according to those that fly them
@nathansharma87
9 ай бұрын
That sales rep knows his product inside out. It's so nice to see. So many third party guys are just salesmen. Really great video.
@petergrundy8081
2 жыл бұрын
Very impressive those features are going to save lives excellent progress Cessna
@robertsopinski7971
Жыл бұрын
I have always wondered why Cessna has not gone to an arrangement like Cirrus has where the prop control has been eliminated.
@firepro329
2 жыл бұрын
I've had the 172 for 4 years, and the 182 for 8 years.... Derek does a really good job of explaining the new aircraft.
@TM-529
2 жыл бұрын
please excuse my ignorance ( i have only flown carbureted 172s/cherokee 140s ) - why this 180 in the video has mixture control if it's fuel injected?
@ZoeSummers1701A
2 жыл бұрын
I loathe those awful glass displays. Too dumbed down and far too cluttered. Too dangerous for GA pilots. Garmin sucks.
@TravelingStacker
2 жыл бұрын
Yet they have more avionics than anyone else. You, however, are probable making Star Trek videos.
@paulwilson8367
2 жыл бұрын
It's beautiful. I had hoped that someday when I retired from airline flying, I could hope to own something like a 182. But, of course no way, even the 40 year old ones are very expensive and that is only the beginning when you think about fuel, maintenance, annual checks, etc. etc. I flew a 182 a few times as a youth, pleasant memories.
@joehall7883
2 жыл бұрын
You are correct....prices and flying costs are insane.
@Brady_Da_GOAT
2 жыл бұрын
Obviously, you do not know how to budget well. Lol if your a airline/commercial pilot, and lived a low budget lifestyle, a used one at around $380K is totally possible. I’m training to become a pilot and companies like FedEx and Southwest are paying beginner pilots above $150K a year. If your experience.. past $200K. There a pilot shortage so pay has increased dramatically. Owning a plane like this is very much possible is one’s lifestyle is low and reasonable.
@paulwilson8367
2 жыл бұрын
@@Brady_Da_GOAT that’s funny, 380k. And that’s just the beginning. Good luck dude.
@paulwilson8367
2 жыл бұрын
@@Brady_Da_GOAT btw if you’re learning to fly for the money and not because you love it, you’re making a mistake.
@Jaypilot100
2 жыл бұрын
@@Brady_Da_GOAT a first year pilot makes first year pay. A second year pilot makes second year pay. There is no such thing as experienced pay or beginners pay.
@crazyspace6792
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's a great first airplane except for the part where it costs $653,000.
@Optimization_Coach
2 жыл бұрын
Truth! LMAO
@sonnyburnett8725
2 жыл бұрын
As an older guy who flew the 182 fifty plus yrs ago I think the safety features of the G1000 and autopilot are wonderful but the pilots should hand fly it all the time, at least on short hops like this and look outside a lot more. Sitting there staring at the screens ain’t cool. That said, I’d love to fly one of these.
@batesvillbilly368
2 жыл бұрын
I think you should still fly sitting in the open on the wing like Wilbur Wright. Vacuum instruments are wonderful but pilots should have to stick their finger into the wind to judge speed, at least on short hops like this and feel the outside a lot more. Sitting there behind a wind screen ain't cool.
@alistairedw
Жыл бұрын
Great aircraft. I have fond memories of skydiving from a 182 over 40 years ago. Strut & step exit, so you would spend a bit of time hanging onto the strut, before dropping away into free fall.
@lkdysinger
2 жыл бұрын
Great plane. A 67 year old design that has not changed much as far as the airframe. It if grossly overpriced. Why doesn't CESSNA offer electronic ignition and tuned exhaust to improve performance and reduce fuel burn
@philconey11
2 жыл бұрын
Thank the FAA for that.
@RickJohnson
2 жыл бұрын
Simple. Certification cost and red tape don't make it profitable.
@brentdavidson3965
2 жыл бұрын
Why does this model need flaps for a standard TO? There was no indication they were performing a soft field or short field TO. My standard TO in my 182 is without flaps.
Пікірлер: 1,3 М.