Perhaps we should look at Damen Shipyards, the got a lot of good designs, and many proven designs, and they like to produce in other countries.
@jankeesvanderwal8546
Жыл бұрын
Agree fully, perfect type of ship for their knowledge and experience.
@bits2646
Жыл бұрын
I like the forward way of thinking of Danish navy, impressive strenght of navy already for such a small nation
@stedymyheart217
Жыл бұрын
Mabuhay from the Philippines... 🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭 #1
@chandrachurniyogi8394
Жыл бұрын
it's time for the compromised Scandinavian navies to come together join forces & function as one . . . in ancient times Viking raiders always teamed up with other Viking raiders & fought together against the enemy . . .
@Yuki_Ika7
Жыл бұрын
Their Air Forces are already doing this, and when Sweden joins NATO their Navies will in a way become one alliance
@BS-vm5bt
Жыл бұрын
Better with a EU army since there is is the resources of a superpower there. It is just pointless waste of money otherwise.
@jesperlykkeberg7438
Жыл бұрын
The Royal Danish Navy has nine ocean going frigates. The Swedes have none. It will be a while before the Swedes can cruise with the big boys.
@heuhen
Жыл бұрын
Ehhh we are doing that already....
@bjorn2625
10 ай бұрын
@@jesperlykkeberg7438 Our Swedish brothers and sisters have had a very different mission for the last 50 years. They've traditionally not joined NATO/US-led operations out in the wider world, but have focused on defending their homeland and possibly completely on their own. Their navy has been perfectly adapted to their task. One could ask if the Danish navy has managed the same, given the scramble to build more boats for the Baltic. That said, I utterly agree that the Scandinavian region should integrate their armed forces, now that all are (or will be) in NATO ... in the same way we are seeing France, Germany and the Benelux region does.
@brisser68
Жыл бұрын
i love the danish ships we allready have. plz keep them many years. even if we got new ships the old can still funktion some were in the arctic and baltic regions.. :-)
@andreasbruckner8109
Жыл бұрын
Are these ships and also other ships of Danish Royal Navy out of non-magnetic steel? Others are for minehunting operations for example..
@mikkel066h
Ай бұрын
They are going to be multirole modular ships. So yes very likely being made out of nonmagnetic steel and would be able with a limited overhaul in port to be switched to minehunting operations. Since they have to be able to switch from one type of mission to another in short time. Which means they gotta be doing everything from, patrol, subhunting and many other missions
@cuba3433
Жыл бұрын
Good Job U K 🇬🇧 👍 !!. I love you ❤ !. Rusia no god ??.. jajaja..
@kwinter2541
Жыл бұрын
#Canada #Denmark #Scandinavia #Terra
@SWOBIZ
2 ай бұрын
The US Navy has some littoral combat ships they could sell you...
@heinedenmark
Жыл бұрын
From what I about ship design.. This seems to be a quite slow vessel. And that doesn't make much sense, if it's supposed to intercept other military vessels 🤷♂️
@heuhen
Жыл бұрын
It's not designed for that role at all....
@heinedenmark
Жыл бұрын
@@heuhen Well . that's what we need 🤷 Anders Puck Nielsen believe we should have stealth corvettes like Sweden. And several others in the Navy have criticized this design.
@MrBandholm
Жыл бұрын
@@heinedenmark These ships are for SAR (search and rescue), policing the national waters, as well as helping with a number of other secondary roles in the maritime enviroment. They are not warships in the classic sense (as of the current design specifications). These ships are in the line of the older cutters. Slow ships that does important jobs in the civilian aspect of the navy. What Anders has talked about, is the re-introduction of a small warship, the Swedish corvettes are simple examples, but these will fulfill an entirely different role. It is not an "one or the other" concept, but an actual addition to the navy. I know this, because I have been involved with Anders, writing about the needs for one of his projects on the defence academy.
@heinedenmark
Жыл бұрын
@@MrBandholm So.. what are the weapons for?
@MrBandholm
Жыл бұрын
@@heinedenmark police duty. And second line work, in case of war. These are perhaps better understod, if you call them "coast guard ships"
@rodneypantony3551
Жыл бұрын
There was an ex KGB artificial intelligence officer working for BlackBerry, 2008, and then Maluuba. Both apparently fired him. Could NOT do what he said he could. Query a pattern of Putin's artificial intelligence people overstating their capabilities. Ask John Chen for the guy's name and have a chat.
@bjarkehansen4911
11 ай бұрын
TARD
@giod6266
Жыл бұрын
To build a ship takes 10 years and more in the West, bureaucracy and so on.. But in China, it takes like a year to build a ship!
@agffans5725
Жыл бұрын
As we all know by personal experience, then Chinese products lack in quality and easily breaks down, exactly due to cutting corners and the lack time and effort spend.
@giod6266
Жыл бұрын
@@agffans5725 Not anymore, it was as you say before yes. And not when it comes to military production. AND, there are a lot of sources saying that Chinese military ships are of same qualityl as US and in some cases better! It is because US has stopped mass production/building ships for years ago! US navy is old, very old, I mean most of the ships US have are old. Yes, some ships are upgraded in some cases and new carriers like Gerald Ford are build, but it is still in testing phase it so advanced. Military experts agree on that today's Chinese navy has both quality and quantity.
@agffans5725
Жыл бұрын
@@giod6266 .. Wrong.. I personally stay clear of anything Chinese, because it's crap to be honest and I can afford not to buy it, so this is the perception of China in all of Western Europe, also regarding their military.
@heuhen
Жыл бұрын
It doesn't take 10 years to build, but the work and designing before building a ship take time, the ship it self take around 1-2 years to build and up to 1 year of testing.
@PlasmodiumV
Жыл бұрын
They are ruining marine life with those toxic wind turbines.
@henrikerdland578
Жыл бұрын
toxic?!
@michaelmulligan0
Жыл бұрын
Ireland really needs to work with Denmark
@captivatethem
Жыл бұрын
The first vessel looks like the new Canadian Offshore Arctic Patrol Ship, but with more teeth and a possible ASW role. Fascinating modular mission bay concepts.
@nobodyjustme7481
Жыл бұрын
Norwegian patrol ship also. That's a modern hull design for patrol vessels operates in the icy waters.
@captivatethem
Жыл бұрын
@@nobodyjustme7481 you're absolutely right, the Canadian ship was a modified Norwegian design. Regarding their future Baltic needs, the Danes would look good with the FREM if they could build it locally. Korean offerings are also very interesting.
@nobodyjustme7481
Жыл бұрын
@@captivatethemFREMM is the best western frigate, no doubt about that. That's why US navy and Indonesian navy ordered FREMM. But Korean, um.. their current submarines is disappointing, their current LHD Dokdo class also disappointing, they still struggling with corruption inside their government. So I'm not really sure about their future frigates or corvettes. I would only recommend from Japanese. Like Mogami class frigate. Zero defect, advance tech, but literally half price than FREMM. Not to mention they have zero defect on their Izumo Class destroyer. Japanese now is a mad max country after US allows them to expand their military power. They even able to built 5th gen fighter jet, and now they are developing 6th gen fighter jet with the US.
@eanerickson8915
Жыл бұрын
Minus the drunks and homosexuals.
@henrikerdland578
Жыл бұрын
@@captivatethemWhy should Denmark go with the FREMM class, when Denmark already operates the Iver Huitfeldt class. FREMM and Iver Huitfeldt are very similar.
@kimkristensen2816
Жыл бұрын
The new multirole corvette is replacing the Diana class (launched 2006-2007). 6 ships are planed but only 5 billion dkk is in the total budget for now. 7.5 billion is more realistic. 4 Thetis class arctic corvettes (launched 1989-1991) are long overdue for replacement, but this may be pushed another 10 years. Likely it will be with a more capable replacement in a fregat size such as the 4 Finnish Pohjanmaa class which cost about 10 billion total. 2 Absalon class ASW fregates (launched 2004) will likely be about the same size as now, but with updated weapon/sensor technology and therefore much more expensive. 3 Iver Heuitfeld class airdefence fregats (launched 2010) is equiped with a 32 cell VLS. Expect the same or more in its replacement and perhabs to carry even superzonic missiles. 32 smaller vessels of marinehjemmeværnet (launched 1992/2003-2011) are also to be replaced perhabs with Baltic Workboats patrol class type vessels. That would total about 1 billion dkk. Supposely there is 40 billion dkk in the budget for the listed vessels. There seems to be a political will to reintroduce submarines in the Danish navy again. 3 type 212CD or A-26 would cost upwards 21 billion dkk with likely launch in 2036-2038.
@waynesworldofsci-tech
Жыл бұрын
Ah, the enemy admiral in the Island Liquor Bottle War.
@EricPham-gr8pg
4 ай бұрын
I had techniques to protect ship , building and personal from artillery or missile or airplane or even uav
@ioanbota9397
Жыл бұрын
I like it they are powerful
@Ade-mu4zn
Жыл бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩👌👍💪🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩 1000D
@redblueyankee8343
Жыл бұрын
Chimpanzee flag😂
@honfmeilingfleet957
Жыл бұрын
another new ship that could be added in Modern Warships
@IsraelMilitaryChannel
Жыл бұрын
Impressive ships
@AugmentedGravity
6 ай бұрын
Fantastic interview.
@jim.pearsall
Жыл бұрын
👏🏻👍🏻🇩🇰
@ThePRCommander
Жыл бұрын
I dont like the design.
@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617
Жыл бұрын
No VLS, no guns. It’s not a warship.
@heinedenmark
Жыл бұрын
From what I can see, it has a 127mm MK4 cannon and two 35mm Millennium guns 🤷♂️
@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617
Жыл бұрын
@@heinedenmark 127mm is good, US and Italian glide and guided round are coming on line so that is good but I don’t understand why just one turret and just a single gun in the turret. You don’t need any more than 4 guns in two twin turrets, one extreme forward and one extreme aft. With just one turret and single gun, the ship is not able to defend itself from air attack and swarm attacks by missile boats and loitering munitions. This is not a warship. The Chinese coast guard and fishing fleets have more weapons systems aboard than these ships will. They’re herbivores.
@heinedenmark
Жыл бұрын
@@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617 The Millennium Guns are CIWS that fire advanced 35mm AHEAD ammunition. Look it up.
@harveyblanquisco6738
Жыл бұрын
@@heinedenmark its a Oto Melara 76mm Super Rapid
@heinedenmark
Жыл бұрын
@@harveyblanquisco6738You might be right. Makes more sense in a defensive role, which is what these are for.
@davidprins5504
Жыл бұрын
next pipeline they blow up will be a better job then the last time
Пікірлер: 65