I just love most of your lectures and the amazing way you always teach, Thanks, you made my day.
@ahmedjamshaid7727
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for the videos, they really help a lot!
@donationlynwrightwateitohi7411
6 жыл бұрын
Again another perfect explanation...Thanks...I'll tell all EC202 students at my Campus to watch this 8 min rather than wasting our time going for a 2hrs lecture on Game theory. I would have use an hour of my lecture charting if I had come across this before.
@acousticbluesgirl
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you a million times over for such a wonderful explanation!
@lisagatell7117
6 жыл бұрын
You are very talented at explaining this! Thanks!
@trentsmith6749
9 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video! It was exactly what i was looking for!
@johanperez6251
3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, because in this video I understood Game Theory so now I can pass economics for Lawyers.
@graffitiwritersllc
11 ай бұрын
Thank you Dr Hodgson. Preparing for an Econ final @Stern MBA and this was very helpful.
@oviajantevisionario7939
6 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks! You are the reason I know understand this. It would be cool if you could do a video on Mixed--Strategy Nash equilibrium ;)
@hafikadamzadeh4383
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your videos.
@RobertGilMassa
5 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I needed! Thank you :)
@jinyufei5125
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you sooooo much !! this is so helpful
@taofiqasultana6056
2 жыл бұрын
Hello, I have some questions. If u have two players with three strategies (Low, High and Medium) - Simultaneous game. And when we try find the best response for each of the player, it will come out the following : Player 1 L - H M - H H - M Player 2 L - H M- H H- M Playoff Matrix SC L M H L (3,3) (2,5) (1,6) M (5,2) (4,4) (2,5) H (6,1) (5,2) (-2,-2) How we could we say that there is a dominant strategies or not? Because I am confused as I think there is no dominant strategy and if there is no dominant strategy what it will be the Nash equilibrium Another question, if we move one player and then the other one , our outcome could change?
@tdreamgmail
6 жыл бұрын
The real question is how do you estimate payoffs in real world scenarios?
@waimun8856
4 жыл бұрын
I have my exam 10 hours later and thanks god I found your video ❤️
@drprashantdash
7 жыл бұрын
glad that i found your video. It makes cake walk of NASH
@yelenayegorova9836
2 жыл бұрын
Very clear presentation!
@jais4305
7 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video lesson on simultaneous move games. Some interesting examples of such games that i came across are Prisoner's dilemma and Parity chess.
@KelvinWKiger
7 жыл бұрын
Perfect ! Thank very much.
@AAA-ji7bw
5 жыл бұрын
I really appreciated to ur teaching , thanks u !! ,
@chaimaelaissaoui6870
Жыл бұрын
thank you so much ! you're an excellent professor
@ayeshasheikh6912
6 жыл бұрын
a million thanks. very very helpful
@monaanand9100
7 жыл бұрын
very well explained !Thanks
@hildaafeku-amenyo5161
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Ashley. This helped a lot. Any videos on Pareto efficiency?
@mashuraemdad
8 жыл бұрын
thank you soooo much! you saved my life the day before my exam
@HazarHome
7 жыл бұрын
so good thank you so much from Turkey ^^
@Nattapuy
6 жыл бұрын
very helpful. thank you so much
@alancantu2557
9 ай бұрын
Would it also be a prisoner’s dilemma since both could’ve gotten higher payouts in different scenarios?
@MMBariise
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I'll excel in my exam tomorrow because of you.
@manavkanoi8175
4 жыл бұрын
Ted's dominant strategy is going low, Lisa can easily guess this. Even if she can't deduce this, according to me she should have opted to go low, as when Ted goes high and Lisa too is going high she is earning 5 utility but when she goes low instead of high in this situation, she is the one who only loses 1 utility, on the other hand, Ted has to compromise 3, which makes Lisa more competitive. But then again, the basic assumption is more utility is better. In my case, Lisa is gaining more utility as she is encouraged by the fact that the gap between her and Ted is reduced and this is the only case in which she is earning more.
@prashantlimbu6792
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Ashley Greetings from Nepal Your explanation was mind blowing I was really feeling confused having hards time in game theory n payoff matrix Though, I never understood from professor.. he was unable explain in simple language. ur explanation made it crystal clear to me..... Thank you I am really subscribing now you are awesome. Mam i anticipating further more videos relating to the subject matter. inspiring mam
@sigakavya7494
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@ahmedipt1755
3 жыл бұрын
Many thanks
@ayeshatahreemsiddique4142
7 жыл бұрын
Thank you! :)
@alanstas
7 жыл бұрын
very nice thank you
@abdiadam236
Жыл бұрын
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻😀💪🏼
@donjetarexha4938
5 жыл бұрын
Hi...Is there any video about game tree sequential capacity expansion game? Thanks
@alexa-lv6di
3 жыл бұрын
But how do I illustrate this in a game tree ???? Please
@juandeswardt4818
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Emma Stone
@ucntcit
7 жыл бұрын
Game Theory seems to cut reality down way too much.
@AkshayAradhya
8 жыл бұрын
What if Ted did not have a dominant, then what should Lisa choose ?
@TreBlass
7 жыл бұрын
There are situations when there is no Nash Equilibrium
@kylechacko7484
6 жыл бұрын
honestly if ted goes high, Lisa should not go High as well.... Yes she does get 5 but Tedd also gets 6 which is more than lisa...If Tedd goes High I think Lisa would go low because she gets 4 but she also beats Tedd because Tedd only gets 3
@eleonorabonel372
4 жыл бұрын
Are you related to Geoff Hodgson?
@AshleyHodgson
4 жыл бұрын
Not that I know of, although I'm sure if you go back enough generations, I'd be related to him.
Пікірлер: 46