I don’t know if it shows up on a computer this way, but on my phone, your little banner in the upper left corner covers right over the top of anything that you’re writing in the upper left corner. So all of your little dimension things that you put up in there I couldn’t see them at all. other than that, I love your videos!
@RDeanOdell
5 ай бұрын
Hi, good catch! I made it semi-transparent so it should be better for next time.
@josephshaff5194
4 ай бұрын
See that top view . . . that's an Assembly. s/b on Part Level. That's usually how it's done. The main View should be Front. The Main View is selected because it contains the most information or features. We don't Dimension to hidden Features. We do not Duplicate information on Drawings. I.e. The Tolerance Note is in the Title Block but also has a different 2 pl. -lol Drawings should always be less confusing not more. A Drafter / Designer is conveying information to someone trying to make the part. Joseph F. Shaff EM Drafter / Designer 13 yrs. exp., 2 yr. Deg AASD EM Packaging & Design NSCC, 4 yrs Drafting HS (AP) Transfer Student Physics (off cycle).
@ariel59864470
5 ай бұрын
🏆
@brianvickery3397
5 ай бұрын
Shouldn't the +/-.005 converted to a positional tolerance be DIA .014 instead of the DIA .007 you showed on the screen for those thee holes on the center of that part?
@brianvickery3397
5 ай бұрын
On drawing T-99K-1-1
@karthikkulkarni9458
5 ай бұрын
Can you pls do live stream of interpreting angular basic dimensions controlled with angularity plus MMC condition
@deadpresident78
5 ай бұрын
I feel B should have been the hole with A and B being meet at center-line of hole.
@josephshaff5194
4 ай бұрын
Top Part 3rd Angle. Bottom Part 1st Angle. lol. Pretty Scary Drawings. Not all Drafters are =. I think Engineers only get one or two drawing courses.
@soundarvenugopal
5 ай бұрын
How to define the tolerance of part ?? For eg: rectangular bar with 4 holes near to corners and 1 center hole... On what criteria do I need to start providing the tolerance ??
@chrmeiss67
5 ай бұрын
Tolerances should be based on function. The result should be derived two times for verification and manufacturing. About what feature functions do we speak?
@chrmeiss67
5 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, it is difficult to talk about function based only on a single-part drawing. The always very important contacts appear in assembly constrains. First, should we talk about an explicit functional specification of features? The seconed step is the design of the function using GD&T toolbox (or ISO GPS). The result is a model of nature contacts with a mistake against nature. Derived specifications for verification and manufacturing should be the next steps in an industrial usecase…
@user-ry9se6jz5b
26 күн бұрын
So what is your real nam heeouse I am Ryan Dean ODell in Santa Rosa
@thatldopig6794
5 ай бұрын
First
@josephshaff5194
4 ай бұрын
Now . . . lol . . . oh nothing . . . Okay do you see that Hole on the Top View. LOL. 1/4 -20 UNC 2B THRU So the Part is 3/4 in. total. Then they are coming over 5/8 in. for a 1/4 -20 Tapped Hole. Where (.75 - .625) = .125 so 1/8 in. Then they are going to drill a hole and tap it at the edge. I mean it is breaking that surface. lol. Because it's 1/8 in. R from .625 and only 1/8 is left to that edge. LMAO
@thatldopig6794
5 ай бұрын
+/- .005
@thatldopig6794
5 ай бұрын
It had no gd&t so why argue its existence?? It can be made correctly.
@RDeanOdell
5 ай бұрын
Not sure what you mean, it’s just an exercise to show how GD&T works.
Пікірлер: 20