Full Un-Edited Reactions Here: www.patreon.com/posts/m0nty-pyth0n-85776586 Life Of Brian: www.patreon.com/posts/m0nty-pyth0ns-0f-85994922
@creaturecaldwell9858
Жыл бұрын
You have to watch " Jabberwocky " from 1979..very similar ..but better in my opinion
@Excanda
Жыл бұрын
Here is some info to understand it better: They didn't have a large budget so they could only afford one horse, which they used to set up the literal cop out at the end by murdering the historian. As for the cartoon parts... they ran out of money partway through making they movie and so filled in the scenes not shot with cartoons as it was cheaper that way. That they could not afford horses made them use coconuts as it sounds the same, but then they are so aware of themselves that they put in on how they could get coconuts in that time period. Oh and the Holy Hand-grenade you at times see in games comes from this movie.
@myphone4590
Жыл бұрын
The knight that killed the historian wasn't connected to Arthur's knights : he had a horse.
@antichoice1
Жыл бұрын
I never caught that!
@br1729
2 ай бұрын
Arthur's lawyer will bring that up at trial.
@johnmaxwell1238
Жыл бұрын
Arthur and his knights were framed. The knight who killed the Famous Historian was on horseback.
@WilliamWyche
Жыл бұрын
You know, I had never considered that, and it kinda blows my mind.
@treefeathers
Жыл бұрын
The murderous knight can be seen at Camelot! But since Arthur and his knights decide not to go there, that means it's not one of his crew. The murderer wears a tabard with a light blue animal rampant on it (looks like a lion or a griffin), and the only matching tabard I ever saw in the whole movie is at Camelot, being worn by John Cleese, who appears on the right of the groups of knights a couple times.
@slowswimmer9169
Жыл бұрын
It was Patsy all along.
@sharkdentures3247
Жыл бұрын
"It's a pretty old movie." Ouch. I felt that. "How old is it?" "1975." "OH MY GOD! That's SO OLD!" I think I'll go sit in a corner and cry Gen X tears. Also? "The CGI is good though." Dude! CGI (Computer Generated Imagery) didn't even EXIST in 1975! (I "think" the first CGI film was The Last Starfighter from 1985!) That was all PRACTICAL effects. (also using some film editing & animation too, but no computers)
@davidtownsend8875
Жыл бұрын
"TRON" (1982) led the way with certain computerized graphic effects.
@ASaaaxxx
Жыл бұрын
I feel the same every time I Hear a youngster react to anything from the 60s and 70s
@GenXDaddyO
Жыл бұрын
CGI!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@qadgopthemercotan
Жыл бұрын
Heh, I saw this movie in a theater in 1975, with my girlfriend. We've been married over 42 years now. And we live in swamp castle.
@SebastianWeinberg
Жыл бұрын
It's just a slight mix-up of terminology. Now that nearly _all_ special effects are computer-generated, it's only natural for the abbreviation "CGI" to have replaced "SFX" in the vernacular. When people say "CGI", they mean "Effects" in general, not only computer-generated ones.
@Uncle_T
Жыл бұрын
No CGI in this one. Like at all. It's all practical (or drawn obviously). :)
@tofersiefken
Жыл бұрын
Here's my summary of the plot: Headline 1975 (not 932 a.d.) During a medieval LARP event, one participant (the only one who brought a real horse and actual sword to a LARP), took the role too far when he killed a historian reporting on the event for local media. Police raided the LARP and detained group organizers for questioning.
@TheGallantDrake
8 ай бұрын
Excuse you, clearly the plot is that King Arthur was charged with finding the Holy Grail by God and about nothing else at all whatsoever. Film comprehension these days…
@robspore5046
Жыл бұрын
Welcome to the absurdist comedy of Monty Python. I've been watching these guys since the late 60s. Absolutely crazy. And the way they keep returning to the whole coconut/swallow problem is just brilliant.
@SilverionX
Жыл бұрын
There's a theory floating around that there isn't any after credits because the team that did the credits were fired at the start (and the animator died of a heart attack).
@justusbraz
7 ай бұрын
Yeah, I was confused about why they didn't watch the opening credits!
@danielcobbins8861
Жыл бұрын
Learning about the legends of Camelot, was/is a required subject of study in the British school system. The members of Monty Python hated that subject in their younger days. When they were asked why they made that movie, they said it was their way of getting even.
@scottandrewbrass1931
10 ай бұрын
Citation needed .
@arthurcamargo8416
Жыл бұрын
This movie was made by a television comedy troupe known as Monty Python's Flying Circus. It was a British show that has endured. The Holy Grail was the first of three movies and when it was made, it was not given a lot of money. It only had enough money some costumes and effects, and one horse. It did make enough that the studio (BBC1) decided to fund another movie called Life of Brian, and that one was good enough to fund a final one called The Meaning of Life. It made the troupe world famous, and some even did side projects as they could now afford to. A Fish Called Wanda is a good example of that, and John Cleese (Sir Lancelot in this movie), especially had a great acting career.
@long-timesci-fienthusiast9626
Жыл бұрын
The ending is literally a cop-out, actually they ran out of money !! The use of coconuts for the sound of horses came from radio plays. The way they acted the riding of horses, comes from young boys of a higher class in the U.K., having hobby horses. You can see what a hobby horse looks like on YT. It consists of a long broom-like shank, with an imitation horses head at the top & a small pair of wheels at the bottom.
@KitsyX
Жыл бұрын
I don't know if you had to be higher class, especially not by the 70s, but you might be more likely to have a better one... And maybe a long time ago it was only upper class people... I think I had one, although it was nothing amazing... A rocking horse might be a bigger deal, but still not crazy to have towards the end of the last century... Especially not a basic one.
@long-timesci-fienthusiast9626
Жыл бұрын
@@KitsyX When I was growing up in the `60`s, I did not know anyone who had one. I only knew of them because they would appear in Tv Shows occasionally, such as (The Avengers) & in relation to upper class or upper-middle class figures. But you may be right, perhaps more prevalent in Southern England.
@MT-it9qt
Жыл бұрын
If you actually watched Monty Python you would be less inclined to believe the ending was a "cop-out (pun recognized)" for cash sake. They never ended their skits with a 'THE END'. It is a classic Monty Python interruption.
@tofersiefken
Жыл бұрын
Among my "theater kid" community in High School and University (in the 1980s), this was the movie to quote. Knowledge of Monty Python bits, whether from the movies or Monty Python's Flying Circus, and being able to banter with like-minded, nerdy, creative types was the currency of social clout. I also really love Monty Python's The Meaning of Life. It has some of my all-time favorite bits (the restaurant scene) and musical numbers (the "sperm" song... don't ask, just watch it). Of course, The Life of Brian is another must-see Python film. It has some interesting behind-the-scenes stories about famous bands / musicians funding the project and how the film was banned in some countries when it came out.
@1805movie
11 ай бұрын
Monty Python: You either love it or you hate it.
@MT-it9qt
Жыл бұрын
You have to realize that CGI wasn't a thing in '75. Back then we were impressed that we could call up the nearby University, set our telephone hand set onto a modem sitting on the table and connect to their computer so we could play text games like: "You enter a room. There is a door to your left and a stair to your right. A- go left. B- go right". Five years later we could boot up our computers by using a cassette tape so we could play Pong. No color screens, no voice audio, NO CGI.
@quasarsphere
Жыл бұрын
But but but but but...if there was no CGI back then, how did NASA fake the moon landings in 1969???
@waynesmith5442
Жыл бұрын
The wizard(John Cleese), when he was asked his name, was supposed to give this ridiculous, incredibly wordy, unbelievably complicated name. When they shot the scene, John forgot his lines(that's why there's a long pause) so, he just said,"Tim". They didn't have money for a second take and the everyone kept a straight face, and rolled on. So they left it in.. actually made it more absurd....
@janzizka9963
Жыл бұрын
The word is shrubbery (shrubs), like bushes or thicket but shrubbery is usually maintained for decorative purpose. Perhaps you could forage for the strawberries in the shrubbery 😁 For example hedge maze is a very advanced form of shrubbery.
@antichoice1
Жыл бұрын
My take on the Knights of Ni is that: they just wanted a landscaper. They talked about the heights of the shrubberies, and placing them around a path. Like the front yard of a residence.
@josheldridge8546
Жыл бұрын
A lot of bits in this film were based on medieval history, Terry Jones (Sir Bedevere, Dennis the Peasant's workmate, the prince in Swamp Castle) was a scholar on medival history; just off the top of my head: there was a stretch of land that no lord wanted so the pesants ruled themselves. There was a religious order that would go around, publicly beating themselves. Sir Lancelot's reputation was one of always charging into battle and just slaying anybody in reach. Terry had a lot of commentary on the dvd, and the documentaries he presented for the BBC on medieval life is really good stuff.
@pirbird14
Жыл бұрын
There wasn't just one religious order that would go around beating themselves. there were many. There were many. This type of religious order was called "flagellants".
@chiefaberach
Жыл бұрын
Taunting & throwing food were real tactics to show that a seige wasn't working and they were so self-sufficient they could afford to waste their food. Hamsters were known for making lots of babies & elderberries were used to make wine (Your mother was a hamster & your father smelled of elderberries)
@br1729
2 ай бұрын
That's what happens at the end of a comedy--the fun's over.
@jeffdee
Жыл бұрын
Guys. There was no CGI in 1975.
@KelsaRavenlock
Жыл бұрын
They simply had no budget for horses, the coconuts was a last minute work around.
@TTM9691
Жыл бұрын
PS: Some of their stuff is just silly and doesn't mean anything. The Knights Who Say Ni doesn't mean anything, it's just silly. Life Of Brian is more "consistent" than this one, from beginning to end.
@joebloggs396
Жыл бұрын
Life of Brian has more and cleverer satire. It's strange that the silliest thing, Biggus Dickus, is actually the most famous part.
@TTM9691
Жыл бұрын
@@joebloggs396 All I can say is Life Of Brian has A LOT more Michael Palin and Terry Jones, and that's a GOOD thing. Palin's character work in "Brian" is incredible, he does like 14 different characters or something crazy like that, many of them hilarious. But definitely the satrie is sharper in "Brian".
@markharris1125
Жыл бұрын
@@joebloggs396 "Biggus Dickus is . . . the most famous part." 😂😂 Excellent.
@chiefaberach
Жыл бұрын
@@markharris1125well, he ranks higher than any in Rome (IYKYK) 😂
@MT-it9qt
Жыл бұрын
'Ni' simply harkens back to the days of childhood when kids chose a word (or sound) that they all agreed to be taboo, punishable by slap.
@kennethfarrand-collins6405
Жыл бұрын
Never try to understand Monty Python, it only hurts your brain.
@andrewward5891
Жыл бұрын
You may have noticed the main actors each played multiple parts in the movie- John Cleese played Lancelot, the Black Knight, the witch burner who claimed to have been turned into a newt, the insulting French guy, and the Wizard Tim.
@jeffmartin1026
Жыл бұрын
Hamsters mate randomly and have large litters. Elderberries were used to make wine at the time. The Frenchman is calling him the son of a whore and a drunkard.
@rmhartman
11 ай бұрын
You have to imagine that ending while you are sitting in a darkened theater.
@eschiedler
Жыл бұрын
Most Americans that grew up around that era can quote most of the jokes from this movie instantly.
@gregmattson2238
Жыл бұрын
jesus christ guys.. for monty python watch everything, including all of the credits!
@chrisofnottingham
Жыл бұрын
Monty Python as a high concept was sketches based on the principles of being silly and not
@zoppie
Жыл бұрын
I think Indiana Jones found the grail in one of his movies.
@markharris1125
Жыл бұрын
Hence his lifelong fear of rabbits. (It was rabbits, wasn't it?)
@TinaTheNaughtyDragon
Жыл бұрын
It's the most foul and dangerous rodent you have ever seen! just look at all the bones!🍖🍖🍖🍖🍖🐇
@sgtmoose1942
Жыл бұрын
A moose once bit my sister.
@starhawk4855
Жыл бұрын
in old movies the sound of horses running was created by a man banging coconuts before sound effects became recordings.
@Thane36425
Жыл бұрын
Castle "Aaargh" is a real place, Castle Stalker. Castle Doune was featured three times: the swallows, the first Frenchman encounter, and the exterior and interior of Castle Anthrax. At the beginning, that was a body. That was likely the wheel, a form of torture and execution. Really nasty.
@corypowercat7277
Жыл бұрын
I'm an older Gen Z and I've been watching this for YEARS. The other Monty Pythos stuff is cool to.
@Lethgar_Smith
Жыл бұрын
What floats on water? Very small rocks!
@chiefaberach
Жыл бұрын
Churches!
@scottwatson9453
Жыл бұрын
The ending was fine according to God as he only gave them the quest to search for the Holy Grail he didn't say they had to actually get it.
@routemaster19
Жыл бұрын
Very interesting seeing how they reacted to the democracy scene near the beginning...a clear example how the humour has shifted with the generations. They still see it as humorous but in a more factually socially appropriate way through the lens of cosplay - using the analogy of king Arthur as a metaphor for the police was a revealing slant!
@syriomontoya5121
Жыл бұрын
the castle for the wedding scene in this movie is actually winterfell, and one castle in outlander
@hbron112
Жыл бұрын
I enjoyed your reaction to this great movie.
@perunandtzuu
Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@myphone4590
Жыл бұрын
Castle anthrax was full of peril. They then encountered the gorge of eternal peril, which the bridgekeeper himself wound up in. The question is: is it the same kind of peril?
@tonycardone990
Жыл бұрын
Nope it's different peril. The gorge was deadly, perilous peril. The castle Anthrax was more like peril light. Definitely a survivable form of peril.
@myphone4590
Жыл бұрын
@@tonycardone990 How do you know?
@rmhartman
11 ай бұрын
That's the first time I've heard Monty Python accused of perpetrating intellectual humor.
@kennywilkus1632
5 ай бұрын
They didn’t have horses because they couldn’t afford them. So they used coconuts! The reason the movie suddenly ends like that is because it’s the story of King Arthur and the Holy Grail. Once they get arrested, that’s the end of the quest. Lol
@martinbynion1589
3 ай бұрын
Don't people in other countries know that a Shrubbery is a garden composed of shrubs?
@Mortigantoj
Жыл бұрын
"The CGI..." 😆
@jonlight670
Жыл бұрын
They couldn’t afford horses, so coconuts. Also they ran out of money so that’s why it suddenly ends. Watch - Life of Brian
@Corfield81
Жыл бұрын
CGI is good for the time? there was none? there were no Computers to do that in 1975 haha
@brandonflorida1092
Жыл бұрын
Great choice of movie and great reaction! Thanks. It's very, very unfortunate that you skipped the opening credits, though, because that's one of the funniest parts of the movie. Go back and watch it and you'll see what I'm talking about. If you continue to react to classic movies, I will subscribe. It's a little hard to tell where you plan to go with your reviews based on your catalog, since you're a new channel. Good luck, though.
@perunandtzuu
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comment. We didn't skip the opening credits, just wasn't included in the KZitem edit. However the opening credits were really funny. Thank you for watching :)
@Ironoclasty
Жыл бұрын
CGI was first used in movie production for the movie Westworld (1973). But it was used to degrade the image, not enhance it. There are some opinions that place CGI as far back as 1958 from Alfred Hitchcock's film, Vertigo, but the imagery used, while generated by a targeting computer, did not involve a computer processing a film image to create an enhanced output. Star Wars was the first time realistic computer processed images were used. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
@brandonflorida1092
Жыл бұрын
@@Ironoclasty It wasn't until the 1990s that CGI became a dominant force in Hollywood, with groundbreaking use in films such as Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) and Jurassic Park (1993).
@gregmattson2238
Жыл бұрын
@@perunandtzuu hey I would suggest in future including the credits and title sequences for movies. glad to hear you watched it, but it really sets the tone for your movie and the reaction. Especially considering this is your first exposure to monty python at all..
@Ironoclasty
Жыл бұрын
@@brandonflorida1092 You're right. Dragonheart was the first time CGI was prominently featured and realistic in any way.
@jontastic
Жыл бұрын
First cgi was in 1985. So all effects are practical.
@timholder6825
Жыл бұрын
No he's not right, a swallow beats it's wings about 8 times a second. Some humming birds do and even faster than 43 times a second. One variety can beat it's wings at up to 80 a second. But not a swallow.
@llanitedave
Жыл бұрын
You have to know these things when you're a king, you know!
@robinhankin9293
Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately humming birds are non-migratory, so...
@fxbear
Жыл бұрын
Truthfully humming birds do migrate. At least around here they do. So the question is, how many of the little buggers would it take to lift a 1lb coconut?
@quasarsphere
Жыл бұрын
You bastard! I've loved this movie since I first saw it in 1984, and now it's ruined! RUINED! *bursts into tears and runs away*
@tofersiefken
Жыл бұрын
You skipped the intro credits? You missed out! That was some funny shit in the credits, most reactors spend a minute reading and appreciating all the moose and llama humor. Did you just fast-forward past them? Patience... good things come to those who wait.
@Yggdrasil42
Жыл бұрын
They didn't skip it, just didn't include it in the YT cut.
@notvalidcharacters
Жыл бұрын
@@Yggdrasil42 I can't fathom why it wouldn't be included, when everything else is.
@williamjones6031
Жыл бұрын
1. What about the moose? 2. Paying attention to the opening credits makes it better for everyone, including you. 3. The first time I saw this was in the back of a pickup at a drive-in (it's still here) with my siblings and a couple of friends. 4. Perfect Monty Python where you can just get sucked into something where you don't have to think about anything and just let yourself go. 5. "What ya gonna do? Bleed on me." 🤣"we'll call it a draw" 🤣 6. Quick bit: "Blow it out your ass"! 7. The ultimate cock block 😭 8. Robin's shield is a chicken. 9.The only horse in the film is ridden by the guy that killed the historian. 10.The ending sucked. It was a cop out. Literally They ran out of 🤑🤑
@jamesnash6101
9 ай бұрын
I love watching reactions to this movie. Especially from those who don't get it. They always have this look of puzzlement. Especially from those who don't understand this type meta humor. Or the history of religion, or the history of the French and their battles with England. And I don't blame them, because when this movie was released, in 76. I was a teen, and I didn't get it. But now, I do.
@adaddinsane
Жыл бұрын
Great reaction. Shields were definitely used offensively. You should watch Life of Brian. No it was low budget because they had no money. Monty Python were a TV sketch group, which is why this is like a series of skits.
@perunandtzuu
Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comment, we have watched Life of Brian yesterday and its hilarious. Its on patreon now, but will be on the channel soon :)
@a4kata40
Жыл бұрын
Crazy movie 😂😂
@alt7244
5 ай бұрын
If you try to understand monty python, you dont understand monty python
@rmhartman
11 ай бұрын
"The CGI is kinda good for that time" ... um ... WHAT CGI?
@glassontherocks
8 ай бұрын
Gen Z would feel more at home watching "Idiocracy"
@tranya327
Жыл бұрын
Don't know if you skipped over the opening credits on your viewing, or you did watch them & merely chose not to include that portion in your video. In the event that you didn't watch them (but merely used the scroll bar to skip over that part), you inadvertently cheated yourself: This is one movie where EVERYTHING, even the opening credits, are a series of running jokes. We have Michael Palin to thank for the opening credit jokes (If you didn't see them, I urge you to go back and take them in!) Michael Palin played Sir Galahad, and the King of Swamp Castle, Dennis the 'Constitutional Peasant' ...the first castle guard who questions Arthur about the Coconut, & a number of other characters (including the film's narrator). The opening credits have a premise that there are multiple people behind the scenes, attempting to edit the film in real time. These people all have different visions of what sort of film this is trying to be, and what credits (or subtitles) should be shown next. (The 'different visions' element, is something that often happens in real life on film projects - producers, directors, editors, composers all wanting things to be done their way.) These opening credits are a classic example of how this comedy team created a truly funny series of jokes, using nothing but white text on a black background, and some music, and next-to-no money! We're very lucky to have this film.
@JPMadden
Жыл бұрын
1) They used coconuts for the sound of horses' hooves because they didn't have enough money to hire horses. Necessity led to one of the funniest running gags in film history. 2) At 6:45, the monks hitting themselves in the head was not a comic exaggeration. In the 1340s the Black Death, caused by bubonic plague, killed 30-60% of the entire population of Europe. It was not then understood how the disease was transmitted, and they had no medicine even if they had understood. It was assumed that God was angry, and some people tried to appease God by travelling from town to town flagellating (hitting) themselves. 3) Comparing an accused witch's weight to a duck likely never happened, but testing them to see if they float or sink in water actually did. It was believed that a witch would float and an innocent person would sink. Unfortunately, many of those accused drowned. 4) I interpret the strange ending to mean that the entire film was just a bunch of modern-day idiots in medieval costumes running around in the woods. None of them had horses, so we don't know who killed the historian. (Monty Python's Flying Circus sometimes ended their TV skits in the middle of them, because the writers ran out of jokes. That's probably why the film ends the way it does.)
@mikejankowski6321
Жыл бұрын
Many sketches ended with a policeman arresting the players. One even had the first policeman getting arrested by a second, who got arrested by a third, and the sketch cut away as a fourth hand landed on the third shoulder.
@NoUniqueUsername
Жыл бұрын
There’s no CGI or graphics. It’s all animation and live action.
@scalefree
Жыл бұрын
in the classical Tales of Camelot the Black Knight fights Arthur who yes, cuts his arms & legs off but not so funny.
@pauldonaldson6067
7 ай бұрын
you should've watched the opening credits, lots of jokes in there which was a shame to have missed out
@brianbutzen6703
Жыл бұрын
Tell me you watched the opening credits and were paying attention. If not you HAVE to go back and watch them. It will be worth it!
@mhlevy
Жыл бұрын
I really hope that you had seen the opening credits. Far too many people skip them...
@Otokichi786
Жыл бұрын
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail": A ROTFLMAO romp through King Arthur's 10the century Britain, where Coconut-bearing Swallows roam the skies. Beware the Mast of Insults, The French Knight!
@JFrazer4303
4 ай бұрын
The most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you've ever set eyes on. It's got a vicious streak a mile wide! Look at the bones!
@stevensprunger3422
Жыл бұрын
The quest is the result
@graemerigg4029
Жыл бұрын
There's 3 and a half tv series before this and a handful of films after. The first two are a compilation of the best sketches and then there is Life of Brian and finally a big budget sketch based film.
@philshorten3221
Жыл бұрын
Before the movie the TV Series Monty Pythons Flying Circus catch phrase was... "and now for something completely different" Famous sketches The Dead Parrot / the lumberjack song The fish dance 5 Minute Argument Ministry of silly walks The art of camouflage Upper Class Twits The Spanish Inquisition Four Yorkshiremen ...... the list is huge!
@ncktbs
Жыл бұрын
cheap wine at the time was made of elderberry's thus he was saying you father was smelling of the cheapest wine implying he was poor and drunk
@dorlonelliott9368
Жыл бұрын
The Rabbet's name is Bun Bun....
@TheGallantDrake
8 ай бұрын
The political peasant scene always gets me. As much as some people want to pretend, those issues of figuring out who’s actually calling the shots and why are very much unresolved. It’s probably that damnable Human Condition or something.
@davidd7536
Жыл бұрын
sorry no cgi
@t0dd000
Жыл бұрын
Love this film. But i can only watch once every few years. Life of Brian is even better IMHO.
@davidd7536
Жыл бұрын
the original cop. out
@rmhartman
11 ай бұрын
Comedic movie? Well... Surreal. Absurd. Insane.
@hynol
Жыл бұрын
How could you cut out when of the part??? Witch trial.
@clutchpedalreturnsprg7710
10 ай бұрын
Hello, if you skipped the opening credits, ypu have missed a large percentage of the humor. Plus, two key hints about the results of this movie.
@clutchpedalreturnsprg7710
10 ай бұрын
P.S. We children before we had bicycles or horses. We rode stick horses like Arthur. Only we did not have coconuts.
@OroborusFMA
9 ай бұрын
It's really funny up until the bridge of death and then it unfortunately gets stupid.
@Ati-MarcusS
Жыл бұрын
Pretty old ? i was born that Year
@t0dd000
Жыл бұрын
The chanting monks. They are making fun of ... Christian monks. Self-flaggelation etc.
@znotch87
Жыл бұрын
Please increase the volume of your video's. Even with max volume it's very hard to understand you.
@notvalidcharacters
Жыл бұрын
You skipped the credits??
@Escrima88
Жыл бұрын
Guys you need to work on your editing can't see what your watching so you and the viewer's can react with you
@SandJosieph
5 ай бұрын
I don't know why but the cursor in the subtitles is triggering me.
@kbrewski1
Жыл бұрын
Can't see the frickin movie, so what's the point?
@scott4482
Жыл бұрын
It's called comedy, something nobody from your generation knows , because woke has killed funnyness.
@jackthecat5497
Жыл бұрын
Looks like you missed the jokes in the opening credits.
@perunandtzuu
Жыл бұрын
We saw the jokes in the opening credit haha, they were super funny. Just didnt include them in the youtube edit, full is on patreon :)
@mr.huzzah3019
7 ай бұрын
I LIVE for peoples reaction to the end the best. lol Huzzah!
Пікірлер: 148