People get mad after losing and assume they're cheating, and then they report them, and that's why you're reviewing them. So many cases are obvious that the person wasn't cheating
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
I agree
@lucassancere4072
6 күн бұрын
Yes + in other games where you can report easily, most of the reports are not legit so I don t see why here should be different
@luminouskiwi1104
6 күн бұрын
Also would be nice to see their skill level, like if a 1500 went Cusco on Loreto I’d say that’s pretty suspicious
@aspuzling
6 күн бұрын
Also, they'd have to include games from people who are known non-cheaters in order to validate that the person giving feedback isn't trying to troll the system by accusing everyone of being guilty.
@legendarydestroyer1232
6 күн бұрын
if they weren’t googling they would scan for it
@dr.prof.kubinski9098
6 күн бұрын
Elo is a must and imo. also the country of the player because they might be fluent in a language or know the cities in their country giving them an advantage that might appear like a cheat without being one.
@PhillyPhil3737
6 күн бұрын
Agree. For instance, that Northern Ireland round would be very possible for even a gold rated player who lives in that area of the world. Otherwise you would have to think they googled to hone in that quickly.
@XDaosoadX
6 күн бұрын
i agree that would be helpful. but there also could be just a repeated round. deciding because of one round is near impossible if there isn't obvious scripting
@dominikheinz2297
6 күн бұрын
Flag doesnt imply that you can speak the language. Just because your location is set to a certain country does not mean you speak the language - but yea, its more likely.
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
I’m not sure how much the flag helps. A lot use VPNs but also many will study countries they aren’t from. For example, I live in Canada but I’ve practiced Australia and South Africa a ton more. My best friend lives in Australia and my family is South African
@Lungorizz
6 күн бұрын
Yeah one time I actually got the parking lot exit from my old High School. If it would've been a duel, I bet I'd get reported for being able to 5k within seconds
@dusty_dusty
6 күн бұрын
As a masters player I used to get frustrated the devs weren't looking at the instances of beyond obvious googling I was submitting. Now that I see what they have to deal with ... I'm sorry.
@Geodaizy
4 күн бұрын
The last Australia round zoom on the bollard seems like a distraction for the sign googling
@grtshw
5 күн бұрын
12:35 I think what's happening in this one is that the player has a script that places their marker somewhere within 250-500 points of a 5k or something like that. And the reason their marker is moving around so erratically is that they are spamming the script hotkey to see the general area around the loc so they can come up with a plausible guess. You can tell because a few times they place their marker outside of where the map is zoomed in
@mosesve1
5 күн бұрын
That is IMHO a very dangerous feature. I just started playing a few weeks ago and sometimes I am looking at a street sign to remember the language or if something else comes to mind by looking at city names. And I had a few very lucky guesses in those weeks. In addition to that someone could easily be drinking something, eating, smoking, whatever while not doing anything for 15 seconds on GG. Your reasoning for selecting guilty on the Cordoba-Round was "maybe", "not 100% sure", "they easily could have", but there was absolutely no evidence for that decision. Please remember that you could easily end someones fun on GG with a "maybe"! Another effect: I now have to not only think about the location, but also about how I am playing / thinking / guessing...
@TehOnlyAnd1-pw8ci
6 күн бұрын
Also disagree about the Indo case at 35:08. From my perspective (~1300 rating, I don't know Kabupaten and am poor at region guessing) I see it as someone taking a bit of time reading a promising sign with a lot of info. As the last word on the sign you have the province Sulbar (i.e. Sulawesi Barat or West Sulawesi), which is something I would recognise. They then go to the map and click Indo in West Kalimantan (maybe just remembered "West"), then check again the sign, switch to Sulawesi, and then Mamasa is visible on the map immediately, and quite prominently in West Sulawesi and they click on it. I might well have played exactly the same except being hopefully much quicker at seeing "Sulbar".
@smallwisdom8819
6 күн бұрын
Yeah. Almost definitly not cheating in my opinion. It's obviously indo. So just make sure there is a plonk (here kali), then think from there. Sula, mabye, hm ..ah there! yeah. Very normal looking in my eyes.
@brightlessness
6 күн бұрын
The last one is a googler imo. If you search up what was on the sign you get the location instantly
@zakigeyan
6 күн бұрын
there should be player rating, tier, and player's flag or home country i guess. even the low rated player from big countries could score 4800+ points very quickly in moving game if it's in their home country
@bigmiraclewhips
6 күн бұрын
people must just get tilted and report their opponent whenever they lose because a lot of these were completely reasonable guesses
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
that seems to be the case with a lot of these
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
Ya. I have a friend who does that. He’s really low level and therefor thinks people who guess well are always cheating but I’m just like they know meta but he keeps reporting all of them 😂
@angelineang5089
5 күн бұрын
@@NathanLipetzsounds like a horrible friend
@NathanLipetz
5 күн бұрын
@@angelineang5089 He's just not so knowledgeable about meta and doesn't understand that most players at gold will already know at least some meta things
@OlalOop
5 күн бұрын
How can you EVER be 100% sure that a person did not cheat?
@cropsini
6 күн бұрын
30:00 they zoom in because Kigali sign shows only when you zoom in really hard
@riader
5 күн бұрын
this is actually so fun to do, but i agree that having the rating visible is very necessary to accurately assess
@TehOnlyAnd1-pw8ci
6 күн бұрын
I'm currently 15 minutes into your video and I've had all those locations as well for review yesterday. I think the instructions "if you are confident that they are 'not guilty', choose 'not guilty'" should be rephrased. That's why you left some "not enough evidence" on rounds that were completely normal play. I think though that in these cases we should use "not guilty" as even though one can never be certain that no script is being used, one should probably err on the side of innocent until proven guilty.
@AliKerim0
6 күн бұрын
i think elo and level info should be given for more fair judging
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
true
@unlimitxyourxself
6 күн бұрын
What about high elo people smurfing or just made a new account for whatever reason? If elo was shown, they would look guilty if their elo was low at the time of the report.
@michaelwisniewski6047
5 күн бұрын
@@unlimitxyourxselfwell, that’s also against the rules…
@unlimitxyourxself
5 күн бұрын
@@michaelwisniewski6047 or someone that plays solo usually at a high level but they decided to do a duel game or just someone with a hell of a lucky guess. Rating shouldnt be used to judge a person's authenticity. It would muddy the waters on the verdict because people would lean on the rating too much to make the decision. What this system does really well is weed out the false reports so the banning team can review actual suspicious players.
@lexistential
5 күн бұрын
I do think there's a potential problem with people like me who had thousands of games before ever touching ranked. I don't know how common this is but it wouldve sucked to get banned just because I was 400 rating and playing like a 1200 and not because I was obviously cheating or anything
@StijnHommes
6 күн бұрын
I think that first round wasn't just a lucky guess. All the indications were that the player knew where that beach was and just had to scan to find the exact spot. They've probably visited that very beach before in real life.
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
Same.
@probably_sh
6 күн бұрын
another round where knowing the person’s country would help
@wayfinder1882
5 күн бұрын
or they could have realized it was UK with ocean to the north that did not look scottish, so northern ireland would be the logical guess
@TehOnlyAnd1-pw8ci
6 күн бұрын
I'm not so certain about the Cambodia case at 25:55. While the initial plonk was in Thailand probably, this might have been done under time pressure to make sure you at least have a plonk in. More suspicious is the then quite specific move to close to the 5k. I reviewed this again then and it was not possible to see the ridge at the border of Thailand. I can't remember how I decided on this one though.
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
I don't think that was the case honestly, just seemed sus with the no zoom plonk + switching on 5k shortly after
@pitaodsira7354
6 күн бұрын
Yeah probably not cheating IMO, just a person who wanted to get a first guess in ASAP (they clicked Thai presumably because they were attempting to click western Cambodia while zoomed out far) and then zoomed in, readjusted and made a more precise guess that wasn't actually a 5k, just a close region guess.
@hyphenangel
5 күн бұрын
@@wookgg I'm also not confident, getting really close definitely happens sometimes when you just plonk in the general area without zooming because of time pressure "just seems sus" isn't a valid reason to be 100% confident, to be fair, i think the 1 guess = 1 report system is very dumb. if somebody has a ton of guesses like these, it'd warrant a ban, but being found guilty of scripting after a lucky plonk seems unreasonable. i'd like to see how the geoguessr team handles banning people who are sent as 'guilty' with this system
@iSniper
5 күн бұрын
looked like they were playing on touchpad or something and just got a lucky plonk
@oldo2840
6 күн бұрын
This is a good feature, glad they've added it. They really should show you which country they are from - it would help you to determine if they likely have local knowledge (e.g. on the N Ireland round) You should defo do a series!
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
I agree, and I will probably make a series 👍
@lucassancere4072
6 күн бұрын
I desagree with all people saying ELO should be displayed.. It will add to the bias of seeing high ELO and consider a very good plonk not suspicious. What about the person was cheating from scratch and has a high ELO now? Also the reviewer are high ELO players, might be some cheaters on the reviewers already. And for low ELO, if the cheat is obvious you don t need the ELO and if the plonk is good but not obvious cheat could be the player went there... Also the Dev already have the info of the ELO, so interesting for them to see unbiased opinions with different information than the ones they have.
@smallwisdom8819
6 күн бұрын
Yes, to even state that any gold player isn't (or even shouldn't, what ever that implies) able to tell a red car meta in Nigeria is most probably false: Specialization, random knowledge, little playing but lot of KZitem watching, etc. and the sheer numbers of players below master ELO makes it extremly likely that there are always a decent number of players with random knowledge in any ELO.
@arrowheaded
6 күн бұрын
34:45 I don't think you noticed, but this was a team duels game, so _maybe_ their teammate knew the kab? not too sure 🤔 I hope you do more of these vids, they're really fun to watch and get a laugh out of
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
oh that's why there were 2 people, i thought that was either opponent or a bug 💀team duels never even crossed my mind for some reason
@briocg1004
6 күн бұрын
Even if elo isn't present, and credits to Matepotato's video, if you see the game mode appear as duels, then the suspected player should be silver division or lower because they can't choose modes. If it's nmpz, then they should be masters or higher because that's when it's unlocked.
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
makes sense
@acryyt3904
6 күн бұрын
Honestly I think most of the round are not even suspicious.... It's probably just frustrated players who signaled others just because they lost !
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
there were some very clear cases here, but it's true, some of these are not suspicious at all
@acryyt3904
6 күн бұрын
@@wookgg yes for the googlers it was obvious, they stayed stuck on the signs for ages 🤣 For the scripters is harder to say except for the one in sweden It would be really interesting to know the rating to be more acurate on the judgement 😊
@barleduckgeo
6 күн бұрын
it's also funny that a lot of times the players are probably just bad at the game, and a not THAT impressive guess might look like cheating to them
@theAkornTree
Күн бұрын
That last one definitely seems like googling. The name on the sign isn't hard to remember for a few seconds while the camera is moved, and typing it into google maps brings up the location the player pinned seconds later...
@leoa.1571
6 күн бұрын
I think the last person is clearly scripting, they zoomed on the sign that has the 5k on it, they memorized what it said, zoomed on the bollard and didnt pan for like 20sec, googled it, 5ked.
@smallwisdom8819
6 күн бұрын
You meant googling (as stated in your last part), but said scripting at first. I agree, though it's not 100% clear. Highly suspicious though,
@mrrfyW
5 күн бұрын
Why did KZitem highlight the world “bollard” in this comment to search for 😭
@probably_sh
6 күн бұрын
maybe profile border would be better than elo, because elo can be lowered to mimic lower level players, but profile borders are permanent and show experience
@probably_sh
6 күн бұрын
or both
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
Yes definitely make a series. This is entertaining
@dhdhdhdbdbdbdbd4453
5 күн бұрын
they should show multiple guesses of people so that people arent getting accused of scripting from lucky guesses
@jacksonb4050
6 күн бұрын
Fun to watch definitely do a series
@sevaspirin843
6 күн бұрын
this is really fun! I think I missed being a reviewer by 11 ELO so at least that way I get to see someone do it!
@IdahoMoose
6 күн бұрын
Neat idea, but I'm not sure I like this feature. I am never going to be a pro player - I am just playing Geoguessr for fun. Most of the time I play this with my young kids (under 5) sitting on my lap. Anyone with kids knows they can get unruly without notice and I have had to walk away from the computer for 15+ seconds mid-round before.
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
I don't think you need to worry if you're not cheating, I think it's usually easy to separate obvious cheaters from random great guesses
@harmonyinchaos6381
5 күн бұрын
if ur camera is pointed at an obvious street sign indicating region, and u randomly look at that shield for 15+ seconds its pretty obvious cheating... if u actually say the truth u wouldn't have to worry anything because the chance that u are busy with ur kids the chances ur looking at a street sign that can be googled should be very low so theres that...
@hctkey
5 күн бұрын
they need to show more rounds, because everyone can get a lucky plonk.
@LucasTrikas
5 күн бұрын
I'm pretty sure that on the last Nigeria round the guy clicked on Jimeta first cuz he knows the car meta but then he realized the hills to the north and how flat Jimeta is (he clearly stares at the hills for a good amount of time, in the round and also on the map), to then switch to Jalingo, which also works with the car and the hills. Not a cheater
@0M0rty
5 күн бұрын
Feel like the last one is likely to be a googler, they memorized the sign, then panned away from it to make it less suspicious, that's why they were zoomed in on that bollard for 15s Maybe they can add one more option, like "suspicious" or something, that wouldn't assign guilt to people but flag their account if they do something weird, if they get reported a lot it should require a more thorough review.
@siddkumar8032
5 күн бұрын
I wonder if they are using this as "training data" to train their cheat detection system to identify cheating or not
@AndrisVerners
5 күн бұрын
Great video, would love a series!
@dominikheinz2297
6 күн бұрын
I like these vids, make it a series, like idk, once a week?
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
👀
@jeancarlo1680
5 күн бұрын
Honestly, without the ELO and nationality, this program could lead to a lot of bad judgments. I'm pretty good at Argentina and Brazil because I'm Brazilian and know a lot of Argentina, but I'm crap in Asia and northern Europe. And these cases where you don't see anything suspicious are just crybabies situations where the opponent probably didn't accept the loss.
@rajajinnah6749
5 күн бұрын
You should give Not guilty for obvious plonks. Like the zurich and India ones
@knowledgegeoguessr9060
5 күн бұрын
Wook, you are the future of Geoguessr.
@joycey845
6 күн бұрын
27:04 Nice, first time my hometown's appeared on the channel ;)
@1977akom
6 күн бұрын
I don't think you can really rely on the Elo, it could be an alt account or a good player playing ranked for the first time.
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
I wouldn’t rely on it, but I think it’s helpful to have.
@michaelwisniewski6047
5 күн бұрын
I think you should play more attention to the instruction to „presume innocent”. Not sure why you are leaving so many „insufficient evidence” reviews, if there was zero suspicious activity - surely you should mark „not guilty” as presumption of innocence.
@wookgg
5 күн бұрын
because that should be the other option anyway, when you're doing this you should assume that they're not guilty until proven guilty, so really there should only be 2 options, insufficent evidence and guilty, and if I say they're clear and they end up cheating, then I'm defending a cheater. Not guilty option is kinda useless
@Marcin_Cin
6 күн бұрын
Very nice series, please continue 😊
@diamxnd4202
6 күн бұрын
Yeah this should deffo be a series! I like your judgement too. How does one enter this program?
@rasr100
6 күн бұрын
prob reach high master
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
I think most of high rated players got this option, but I am not sure who gets it
@arrowheaded
6 күн бұрын
I got it and I haven't played comp in months lol, though I'm still champion
@diamxnd4202
5 күн бұрын
@@rasr100 gotta grind then (p.s: i am high master so i think they deffo picked champs)
@ronnilol1
6 күн бұрын
42 min video W
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
👍
@turkmenbilgin802
6 күн бұрын
The Ceara round was from my game and I did not report that opponent. I was around silver 3 and the game was from a few weeks ago I believe. Interestingly I also immediately recognized the sign in the Cordoba round from one of my games but not too sure on that one.
@TehOnlyAnd1-pw8ci
6 күн бұрын
It was probably not your game, just the same location. There are many games played and only around 100,000 locations so they do come up in many games.
@turkmenbilgin802
6 күн бұрын
Maybe. Its the same location and the replay is very similar. He exactly knew where ceara was without even spending a second on the map so I thought its likely the same round but who knows
@jakartaa
6 күн бұрын
btw, just so you know, anyone can be scripting really. there are scripts that allow you to see the location on a separate map before the round starts so you dont stand still at all and you can play normally and use it to inform your guess. really always impossible to tell if someone is scripting unless they space plonk a 4500 on a not obvious round or go like wrong country or water or something (even then this isn't proof bc some people water send on accident or wrong country)
@ronnilol1
6 күн бұрын
They should definitely add the elo and rank of the suspected player
@Lowezar
5 күн бұрын
Reminds me of a game I had and my home city popped up, and there was a sign with the name of one of the markets. :) Of course it first gave me a few seconds pause to "wait... No way!" and then of course I 5k-d that. :) Wonder if that'd look like googling on this review. :)
@acryyt3904
6 күн бұрын
After this video I m thinking it would be great if developers could add an option to be able to review the game from both players perspective to avoid a lot of useless report or to confirm a cheater before report him =)
@acryyt3904
5 күн бұрын
I just realized that there is already this option hahaha 😅
@OssiSaarinenVideos
5 күн бұрын
I would not say that the Uppsala one for example, at 14:30, is 100% cheater. They could have e.g. have connection problems and waited until the picture get sharp and be able to read the text, or after zoomed into the sign they could have got a call or do anything else and then returned to the game and guessed correctly because of simply knowing the location. If judged the same way, there's many rounds I have played where I would have been accused for cheating (which I don't do). Yes - most likely this particular Uppsala-guesser, for example, was cheating but since we don't know for sure, judging players on such basis is a bit problematic. I hope whoever is reviewing the verdicts takes into consideration the total amount of such situations and don't ban anyone based on one or two suspicious rounds. Anyways, great that they are taking more action to ban the cheaters.
@legendarydestroyer1232
6 күн бұрын
if they weren’t googling, they would scan for it
@wookgg
5 күн бұрын
exactly
@LucaVincent
6 күн бұрын
ok most of these its clear that the person reporting is a beginner at the game and can't understand how the opponent is even getting the general area, so why are we looking into these? i feel like the players should have an elo above a certain level to warrant even looking at it so it filters out the stupid ones
@googlemapsspeedruns777
5 күн бұрын
u sound exactly like a big rawlstars youtuber
@tattooboyyt954
6 күн бұрын
I would like to c more of this i liked it thx
@Calterack
5 күн бұрын
14:42 This is certainly not definite that they cheated. A lot of people will read a place name without doing anything interactive with the game just to have a moment to try to remember where it is. Especially since this city is fairly large it isn't hard to find it on the map so quickly after a moment of thought. Just because you have heard of the city before doesn't mean you necessarily immediately zoom in. It's like when you know a word in a foreign language and hear it, it's not necessarily muscle memory that you understand it immediately. On the next round though it certainly is a lot more likely since that town was much smaller and they got the 5k so quickly.
@wookgg
5 күн бұрын
you couldn't be more wrong, if you're trying to "remember" it, it helps to look at the map, and not to stare and do nothing
@Calterack
5 күн бұрын
@@wookgg Respectfully, I never said it doesn't help, it certainly does, but not everyone necessarily has to resort to using the map immediately. I mean, if you casually hear about a place in your life, let's say on the radio or something, is your first thought to think of why it sounds familiar and where you may have heard it before? Or is your first thought to open Google maps and just try to find it? Personally I'd think of why it's familiar first and not immediately open a map. You can't assume everyones first resort would be to open a map and scan without thinking and that anyone who thinks differently to you is cheating. Although, it is possible that they were cheating of course. It helps to try to remember context too, and when people do that, they won't be doing anything but thinking, the human mind isn't built for simultaniously doing different things. Your comment doesn't argue against anything I said, I never even said it doesn't help so I don't really get what you're arguing.
@wookgg
4 күн бұрын
@@Calterack I have no idea what your point is, that guy was clearly googling 🤣
@Calterack
4 күн бұрын
@@wookgg It's most likely, not certain.
@decommonifyable
5 күн бұрын
Just be more confident with your answer. If there's zero evidence just say not guilty. Why always select not enough evidence on clearly normal guessing patterns?
@wookgg
5 күн бұрын
because that should be the other option anyway, when you're doing this you should assume that they're not guilty until proven guilty, so really there should only be 2 options, insufficent evidence and guilty, and if I say they're clear and they end up cheating, then I'm defending a cheater. Not guilty option is kinda useless
@LucasTrikas
5 күн бұрын
I think you should've just clicked not guilty for most of the insufficient evidence ones as they are clearly not cheating and the only reason they are there its cuz someone got mad after losing and falsely accused them of cheating.
@pontuspanflojt
6 күн бұрын
People with low levels should not be able to report…
@OsefKincaid
5 күн бұрын
There's no way the first person googled, if you look up people who google stuff it takes them a lot longer than this
@OsefKincaid
5 күн бұрын
The first two are both very clear not guilty, like if we say insufficient evidence on this we basically never say not guilty
@LucaVincent
6 күн бұрын
who is reporting someone who got the wrong part of taiwan lmao
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
They probably lost to high multis and tilted 😂
@henrikzq
6 күн бұрын
What, if someone uses voice search? How can you proof that?
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
they would still need to stand still in the game while searching, that's why I was looking for weird camera movements as well
@InformatorCelje
6 күн бұрын
Excellent point! (But you can still see how someone is moving/scanning the map. It just seems unnatural sometimes.)
@henrikzq
6 күн бұрын
@@InformatorCelje maybe with a friend. One is playing one is googling. How can you proof that?
@dominikheinz2297
6 күн бұрын
@@wookgg Not necessarily.... Hey Alexa, where is xxx?
@johnjohn1985
6 күн бұрын
love these vids
@shakeweller
5 күн бұрын
Keep in mind that "weird clicking" around the point where someone actually wants to go can always be someone being on a phone. Never suspect awkward clicking around in a circle.
@jonathand1996
5 күн бұрын
I disagree with seeing the elo etc. Don't think that should influence the verdict.
@jonathand1996
5 күн бұрын
Like if you'd ever need to factor in the elo then you cannot be 100% sure and should put insufficient evidence. A lower elo player could have studied one country out of interest and therefore outperform their elo on it. 'Insufficient evidence' as a verdict is to keep them in the system and have more of their rounds investigated.
@XDaosoadX
6 күн бұрын
deciding on just one round is quite difficult, and knowing someone was googling for certain is near impossible
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
the first part is true, the second one not so much, you can be very sure that someone is googling by the way they act
@arseniys3054
2 күн бұрын
Gold can’t play NMPZ
@qwertifier
6 күн бұрын
9:20, so you are 100% sure of scripting? 100%????????
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
yes
@LegacyzGeo
6 күн бұрын
yes i concur too 200%
@smallwisdom8819
6 күн бұрын
Would a higher rated gold player who is not allowed to play NMPZ get ruanda in NMPZ? I think most gold players who 700+ would get that. At least as a 33/33/33 between Uganda/Kenya and Ruanda. And that might be what they were thinking so long about. Ruanda first choice...could it be one of the others...hm.... like that, probably.
@wookgg
5 күн бұрын
that location literally can't be Uganda with the gen 4
@smallwisdom8819
5 күн бұрын
@@wookggDoesn't mean a Gold player can't have that as one of his options. Also they may be thinking about which gen cam it is, etc.
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
8:01 lmao they moved off the 5k. I think that’s honestly just a vibes guess where they were 50/50 between 2 areas and ended up on wrong one. Happens to me a lot when I don’t know the meta If they are scripting, why would they move that far off?
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
that's not a vibe guess, their script put them on a 5k, and since they now knew the country, they went further away to make it less sus. You can tell that it's a script because they basically plonked the 5k without zooming on the map, and the odds of them clicking on a 5k from that distance is just abnormally low.
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
@@wookgg ya fair. I don’t understand how the script works but you explained it a bit after I commented. But still, if they use script, why would they click North to make it less sus? If opponent knows country, they should get closer than a far North guess. I’d expect someone cheating to guess much closer to the location to not look sus but win the round at least
@LegacyzGeo
6 күн бұрын
@NathanLipetz Clearly a very low level player, most likely getting the country is enough. And cheaters are usually dumb.
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
@@LegacyzGeo ya makes sense. Just feels like an obvious Sweden to me, even at low levels. And the normal click for someone who doesn’t know where but knows it’s Sweden would be on or near Stockholm. Clicking North here could lose you 1k+ even on no multis
@joaopaulogardinivieira8721
6 күн бұрын
Hi, i reported the first round of this video, if it makes a difference, im 900 rated and he probably was something arround that as well
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
I don't think that first round was too suspicious, 900 rated players are capable of guesses like that imo
@joaopaulogardinivieira8721
6 күн бұрын
hes currently 864 rated, look how he doesnt do any good guess in the game at all, until this round when there is the name of the beach, that he googled and got the 5k to finish the game
@barleduckgeo
6 күн бұрын
he clearly just scanned and found it, at 1:59 it looks like the person might just be looking at the compass
@TehOnlyAnd1-pw8ci
6 күн бұрын
Doesn't seem suspicious to me. UK plates and coast very much to the North with sandy beach. I think Northern Ireland is quite reasonable to get here, and then scan for the beach name.
@joaopaulogardinivieira8721
6 күн бұрын
@@barleduckgeo he went straight to northern ireland to scan, didnt even considered scotland, wales or england, thats very suspicious in the context that hes not a good player, look at the other guesses he did in the game
@wcheng2795
6 күн бұрын
I'm gonna say the same here like on GeoPeters video, I just hope obvious "no cheating" reports have consequences for the ones who report stuff like that.
@arrowheaded
6 күн бұрын
I did like 15 of these earlier, and almost all of them were REALLY obvious cheaters. It's interesting that your random batch skewed completely reasonable guesses lol
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
yeah I was expecting this to be much more straightforward, a lot of these seemed like normal guesses
@arrowheaded
6 күн бұрын
@@wookgg yeah, maybe geo purposely put in non-sus rounds to see if reviewers are actually being honest? perhaps
@NathanLipetz
6 күн бұрын
They should really put elo and division. Very hard without
@neonlight1214
6 күн бұрын
The firsr guy with the beach was 100% googling
@wookgg
6 күн бұрын
I am not convinced
@maallee
6 күн бұрын
I don't think it's that clear-cut. If you've got an inkling it's Ireland (which isn't that hard of a conclusion to reach), you're obviously gonna start scanning the north coast quite quickly. From there, it's a relatively easy find. Could just as well be googling, but for me it's a perfect example of an inconclusive case.
@lucassancere4072
6 күн бұрын
"100%" clearly not... What About they were from NI. Or just know this coast a bit. The only thing we can say is exactly the opposit, they were not "100% probability" of cheating.
@lucassancere4072
6 күн бұрын
Okay I just read other comments 😂 So the suspected player was Irish so it is even more going against the "100%"
Пікірлер: 175