It is implied (but never openly acknowledged) in Gladiator 1 that Lucius is indeed the son of Maximus.
@floriangrogoll5206
Ай бұрын
This continuation is as necessary as a cyst on the gums. Why can't Hollywood (including Ridely Sott) just leave the masterpiece "Gladiator" alone?
@thewatchers1909
Ай бұрын
lmao i cant disagree with this lolololololll thats why i was like uhhh... i don think i need this lol. Im not gonna lie i still want to watch it but, you're not wrong lol
@brysonfreeman7226
Ай бұрын
Yes agreed, Gladiator should’ve stayed as a stand-alone movie, just like Indiana Jones should’ve stayed as a trilogy, and Star Wars should’ve stayed as a 6-movie saga
@paulure861
Ай бұрын
Lucillas son is maximus's son.
@bronxrob1552
Ай бұрын
No Maximus son was killed in the first movie
@bedzoner
Ай бұрын
So the gladiator is Maximus son and the pale faced guy was the queens son I believe
@aceshigh2784
Ай бұрын
Maximus Son was crucified in the first gladiator after he was trampled by the horse
@ReactionsWithLula1909
Ай бұрын
Oh wow. Thanks guys 😅 I remember nothing from the first Gladiator movie
@user-dk7mc1yh2e
Ай бұрын
They are twin emperors
@decidueye2963
Ай бұрын
Did you even watched the 2000 movie ?
@user-dk7mc1yh2e
Ай бұрын
Denzel is hannibal
@Natedawgg84
Ай бұрын
Denzel is Macrinus
@bronxrob1552
Ай бұрын
How could he be Hannibal. Hannibal was 400 years before the time frame in the movie
@sebastianrichter6075
Ай бұрын
What a bad movie!!!
@GazzaBoo
Ай бұрын
Seriously? Denzel effing Washington? 🤦🏻♂
@thewatchers1909
Ай бұрын
yeah i'll be honest i wasnt expecting him to be any role in this film lol i didnt see that coming at all.
Пікірлер: 17