ok for everyine here are all the movies used A night to remember Atlantic Titanic nazi The unsinkable molly brown
@arricammarques1955
Жыл бұрын
Water tight doors with no ceilings. Flooded like a tray of ice cubes.
@bobzoomtech9085
Жыл бұрын
That’s a very good analogy
@andrewstackpool4911
Жыл бұрын
Rubbish! OF course they had 'ceilings' not a nautical term. But in fact except for one event, the ship may have stayed afloat longer. If you are not a seaman get the hell off the comments
@orwellknew3408
Жыл бұрын
The sailor on lookout survived the sinking but killed himself in 1966 , the last victim of the Titanic
@jusam6854
Жыл бұрын
Wow, really? I never heard that before. Ya learn something new everyday if you just pay attention and listen.
@RSTI191
Жыл бұрын
You are referencing Frederick Fleet. You may want to add the following: Shortly after Christmas, on 28 December 1964, Fleet's wife died, and her brother evicted him from the house. Consequently, Fleet fell into a downward spiral of depression. He returned to his brother-in-law's home and hanged himself in the house's garden on 10 January 1965. He was buried in a pauper's grave at Hollybrook Cemetery, in Southampton. His grave remained unmarked until 1993, when a headstone bearing an engraving of the Titanic was erected through donations raised by the Titanic Historical Society.
@idamarsillo7327
Жыл бұрын
@@RSTI191 That is a very sad story on top of what he went through that night. May his soul RIP How old was he when he died?
@doctorbohr1585
Жыл бұрын
@@idamarsillo7327 he was 77 according to Wikipedia, and had suffered depression his whole life as a result of the Titanic trauma.
@idamarsillo7327
Жыл бұрын
@@doctorbohr1585 Thank You. Poorr man.
@zacmumblethunder7466
Жыл бұрын
For fans of classic Dr Who, the officer giving the hard to starboard command is actor Richard Leech, Gatherer Hade from the Sunmakers.
@pianomanfred1948
Жыл бұрын
And assistant wireless operator Bride is played by David McCallum (Man From U.N.C.L.E. and NCIS).
@phoenixman8569
Жыл бұрын
during David tennants years as doctor who, one of the Christmas specials was a titanic like themed episode "Voyage of the Damned"...
@zacmumblethunder7466
Жыл бұрын
@@pianomanfred1948 McCallum was also Steel in "Sapphire and Steel" and one of the television invisible men in the 70s. I always smile when I see his character name in NCIS though, as "Ducky" in Britain is usually heard in a mocking camp voice in phrases such as "Ooh, get you, Ducky!" when someone is being a drama queen about something.
@johnzeszut3170
Жыл бұрын
This is what happens when nobody is paying attention to what is going on.
@michaelflorez4194
Жыл бұрын
Well said
@Male_46_Is_Bored_EDITZ
Жыл бұрын
no its a remaster of my movie scene
@andrewstackpool4911
Жыл бұрын
You fkn armchair admiral, the officers knew exactly what was going on with the limited intelligence they had. Signals that never reached the bridge, an unusual night, ice far further south than the advisories provided. So Admiral, what would you have done based on the knowledge AT THAT TIME
@lesigh1749
Жыл бұрын
At 0:35 That is a really top-notch set for the bridge. Old movies weren't usually this accurate.
@titidiz6343
Жыл бұрын
Looks like the guy answering the phone with his feet under water had already shit his pants.
@richardgregory3684
Жыл бұрын
Ironically a head-on collision would probably have done less damage, instead the ice effectively sliced open the hull
@DieFlabbergast
Жыл бұрын
Not "probably" -- definitely.
@filifeck9172
Жыл бұрын
Not really. If the hull was welded, maybe, but it was riveted, so the rivets would pop out and the plates would fall apart. Also, at the bow there were many people (mainly stewards), and the head-on collision would most likely kill them.
@richardgregory3684
Жыл бұрын
@@filifeck9172 Yes but the ship would likely not have sunk, since the watertight door system could have constained the flooding; what proved fatal was that the iceberg istead effectively slashed the hull open, so that the flooding exceeded the ability to contain it. iirc it was somethin glike the Titanic could withstand three flooded compartments and remain afloat, but not more.
@Deltaexe190
Жыл бұрын
@@filifeck9172 No. there wouldn’t be a school wave because the bow telescoping would absorb the impact.
@jamieroach5755
Жыл бұрын
was a iceberg the real cause of the sinking is my question 🤨
@justicemeter347
Жыл бұрын
The Bridge in this clip ordered “Hard over to Starboard.” What actually apparently transpired was “Hard over to Port,” as the video footage here portrays. Same turn was executed - too late as well - in the James Cameron film “Titanic.”
@Peregrinami
Жыл бұрын
commands in UK until 30's were given on tiller not on the stern. You need to turn tiller a starboard to turn the ship left.
@justicemeter347
Жыл бұрын
@@Peregrinami Thanks. Was not aware of this historic anomaly.
@shadowstarz3651
Жыл бұрын
@@justicemeter347 Can't say James Cameron didn't do his research.
@jomac841
Жыл бұрын
That is because of tiller commands. When you call an order your turn ends up being opposite. Hard-a-starboard was a hard turn to left, or port. Hard-a-port was the opposite
@jomac841
Жыл бұрын
@@stuartryan9035 to be blunt you have no idea what you are talking about. There was no way a ship as large as Titanic could at that speed evade the berg as close as they were to it. And don’t forget the time taken to ring down to the bridge from the crow’s nest and for the word to get to Murdoch. The time from sighting the berg to collision was less than a minute. That coal fire was in no way a danger to the ship. It was small and contained. The lifeboats were only launched half full because many of the passengers refused to go on. Should the officers pressed a bit more? Sure. But you can’t blame them if passengers refused to board them. Was there a comedy of errors involving the sinking? Yes. A few small things building up to tragedy. I almost somewhat acknowledged your argument until you threw in the whole “it was sunk on purpose” hogwash. Believe historians before you believe what’s on the internet.
@nicholasreid1836
Жыл бұрын
This is clearly spliced together from three separate films - the Nazi version of the Titanic made in 1943; the Hollywood version called "Titanic" in the eary 1950s and [just possibly] the later 1950s British film "A Night to Remember" which itself used some footage from the Nazi film. it's a real mess.
@danijelujcic8644
Жыл бұрын
A few more: S.O.S. Titanic used some colorized ANTR footage and Cameron's 1997 movie remade some ANTR scenes (like Smith's "4 hours" reaction or Ismay, in his boat, turning his head away).
@Male_46_Is_Bored_EDITZ
Жыл бұрын
its a remastered scene
@caitthenerd7470
Жыл бұрын
@@Male_46_Is_Bored_EDITZ I don't think you know what remastered means. Remastered means to take the original recording of something (film reels, multitrack tapes etc.) and republish it, using modern technology to improve it over the original release. What you've done is make a "movie" that doesn't exist out of various pieces of other movies, and not very well either.
@kurtfrancis4621
Жыл бұрын
@@Male_46_Is_Bored_EDITZ No, it is not. It is a cut-n-paste together, spliced together pieces of multiple moviews. Not a remaster.
@KrakenMan5853
Жыл бұрын
Also toward the end, the British version called "Atlantic" from 1929.
@tedthesailor172
Жыл бұрын
If that's remastering, you can keep it...
@LuisRodriguez-ik8dd
Жыл бұрын
COLABORE POR AÑOS EN ESTUDIOS DE GRACION Y NUCA ESCUCHE TAL Cosa NINGUN VIDEO SE PUEDE REMASTERIZAR SOLO EL AUDIO SI ES ORIGINAL Y POR CAMALES SEPARADOS. PERDÓNA SAE.
@kyle381000
Жыл бұрын
Silly question, but would searchlights mounted on the bow have illuminated the iceberg soon enough for it to be avoided?
@toddkurzbard
Жыл бұрын
No. In fact, they would have distracted him from sighting the berg due to the glare from the light impairing his vision.
@kyle381000
Жыл бұрын
@@toddkurzbard If the lights were mounted on the bow and if the lookouts were behind and and above them up in the crowsnest, then how would there be any glare?
@TheTarget1980
Жыл бұрын
0.13. i wonder why he starrs at the side of the ship and not straight to the front from the beginning.
@andrewstackpool4911
Жыл бұрын
He would have been
@jimcrawford5039
Жыл бұрын
How many different movies? Jeez.
@georgewaite2952
Жыл бұрын
Titanic was on top of iceberg before it could fully turn away from iceberg. Ice ripped opened the plates below the water line.
@parrsnipps4495
Жыл бұрын
He says turn to starboard which means turn right, but they actually turn to port (left) and hit the right side of the hull. How could the people making a movie about the Titanic get that wrong?
@Male_46_Is_Bored_EDITZ
Жыл бұрын
cause pf teller commands
@toddkurzbard
Жыл бұрын
It;s not wrong. Helm orders in that day were a holdover from the days of sail. On a wind-driven ship, ordering, say, "Hard a'starboard!", actually meant turning the TILLER starboard, thereby turning the rudder to PORT. I know, it's confusing, and that's probably why the way of given the orders was reversed in 1928, thereby making it much more comprehensible to the masses in the process.
@zoedaly214
Жыл бұрын
god all mighty
@lamusaogamingvlog1709
Жыл бұрын
I think must better hard port slow ahead.
@Dedicated2WendyWilliams
Жыл бұрын
feels like a Bollywood film
@Male_46_Is_Bored_EDITZ
Жыл бұрын
its a remaster of the spin off of all the 1950 remaster iceberg collision
@jbredin1
Жыл бұрын
The engine telegraph of a British liner built in Ireland was marked in German? (@ 1:24) I think not! And if this movie was made in 1959, I'll eat my hat!. It feels like a couple of Titanic movies spliced together, including possibly the Nazi-era German one. Fuzzy picture and bad dubbing at some points, but clear picture and synced sound at others.
@pianomanfred1948
Жыл бұрын
You're partially right. It's probably the British film A Night To Remember from 1958. Some effects scenes in that 1958 movie were 'borrowed' from the 1943 Nazi propaganda film Titanic. I didn't know that, but Wikipedia told me so.
@zacmumblethunder7466
Жыл бұрын
This video is a splicing together if two different films. The footage from "A Night to Remember" is the better quality of the two. The video compiler has spliced in what looks to be a silent movie. The effects in that look like they were filmed in the same way as the flooding of the city in "Metropolis".
@pianomanfred1948
Жыл бұрын
@@zacmumblethunder7466 So you're saying you disagree with what I quoted from Wikipedia? It clearly says that some effects scenes from the 1943 Nazi film were inserted into the actual 1958 film A Night To Remember (not by the compiler of this video). It even specifically says what they are. Although, upon further review, this video does seem to have more old scenes than were described. So maybe the video compiler did include more of the 1943 film. So we're both probably right.
@HDreamer
Жыл бұрын
@@pianomanfred1948 "two of the ship sailing in calm waters during the day, and two of a flooding walkway in the engine room" so you are right, but still looks like there's another movie in this clip as the Iceberg looks different than in A Night To Remember and all those dancing scenes are also not from either movie I'd say.
@danijelujcic8644
Жыл бұрын
@@zacmumblethunder7466 some footage at the end is from the 1929 Atlantic
@joelluongo7419
Жыл бұрын
I think the very first decision that I would have made was to stop the engines.. and get the ship into reverse.
@tonyburzio4107
Жыл бұрын
No, that was incorrect. Once in reverse, the rudder no longer functioned. Full ahead, hard a'port and the ship would have turned.
@tedthesailor172
Жыл бұрын
Yeah - but you'd be making the decision in hindsight. In reality, you'd have thought like everyone else that the ship was unsinkable, don't make a crisis of a drama, don't wake the passengers, don't make a fuss, don't be the one who rocks the boat for the sake of a lump of ice that's not going to be more than a nuisance anyway...
@andrewstackpool4911
Жыл бұрын
Which is what Murdoch did, correct.
@andrewstackpool4911
Жыл бұрын
Oh thank you. That is what he did. You are the new expert. So what would you have done; come on, you are a gd expert. Murdoch acted correctly. However, a possible alternative exists today
@seikibrian8641
Жыл бұрын
@@tedthesailor172 "In reality, you'd have thought like everyone else that the ship was unsinkable..." In reality, no one except the ignorant thought the Titanic was unsinkable; that was a bit of PR fluff by a reporter writing about the ship prior to her maiden voyage.
@solgoodman2694
Жыл бұрын
This is a splice of about three different films. One being the Nazi propogander film, another being A night to remember and I'm not sure on the third but think another review has identified this in the comments.
@zoedaly214
Жыл бұрын
god al mighty
@gregmackenzie5822
Жыл бұрын
Huge mistake , among others ! , going full astern took steerage off the rudder .
@christopherpardell4418
Жыл бұрын
Correct. Stopping or reversing engines would make the ship unable to answer the helm. The correct command would have been full ahead on the port and center screws to increase the side thrust by the full left rudder. She was already steaming at “flank” speed which is the speed at which any ship is most responsive to helm. Slowing the ship literally made her unable to turn.
@andrewstackpool4911
Жыл бұрын
Yes but no. Murdoch did what was correct for the time. Remember the performance of these new massive ships was till being learned. However, what would you have done? Sorry, I am a professional seaman but you are on a relevant course so ???
@christopherpardell4418
Жыл бұрын
@@andrewstackpool4911 On the cry “iceberg right ahead” I would have ordered helm hard to port, and maximum revolutions on the Port screw to pivot the ship about her center of gravity until the bow was pointing more than one point to port of the iceberg, Then helm amidships to drive the ship to the port with the help of the water glancing off the starboard broadside. As the bow drew closer to the iceberg I would have ordered helm to starboard 20 degrees or so to try and pivot the stern away from striking the berg as well. If that didn’t clear the berg, the best case scenario would have been to take the strike amidships so that I had dry watertight compartments in both bow and stern. She could have taken 4-5 flooded compartments amidships and not sunk. As to ship handling… by 1912 steamships had been around for 50 years. Most young seamen would never have served aboard a sailing ship… and powered vessels navigating narrow waterways had long before worked out the safest means of avoiding collisions. She likely would have survived a direct hit on the bow if the Officer of the watch had made No orders. But cutting power to the screws was the worst possible action because even reverse engines would not have reduced her speed by more than 2 kts before she hit… but it nearly eliminated the efficacy of the rudder.
@gregmackenzie5822
Жыл бұрын
@@andrewstackpool4911 Quite right , what was right for the time , two better options would have been , full astern both and hit the berg dead on , or just hard a port .
@christopherpardell4418
Жыл бұрын
The engine telegraph was in German?
@shaney9393
Жыл бұрын
I think it was a Nazi German film made in 1943 or around that and this is remastered
@jusam6854
Жыл бұрын
The British don't say ' dead ahead' , they say ' right ahead'.
@emanuelmota7217
Жыл бұрын
Damn Yanks!!
@rickkinki4624
Жыл бұрын
Yes, and James Cameron got that right.
@jusam6854
Жыл бұрын
@@rickkinki4624 That's right. I'd forgotten about that!
@flitsertheo
Жыл бұрын
The American version could be called "irony" in a way.
@zacmumblethunder7466
Жыл бұрын
I'm British and I've always heard people say "Dead ahead". "Dead" is used in several turns of phrase to mean "precisely". "Dead centre", "Dead to rights", "Dead certain", etc.
@newbeginnings8566
Жыл бұрын
American on the ship's crew? I think not... A load of old rubbish
@fabianabrancati8198
Жыл бұрын
God
@Atlanticoceanliner84
Жыл бұрын
God or Good?
@doctorbohr1585
Жыл бұрын
@@Atlanticoceanliner84 Good God?
@danijelujcic8644
Жыл бұрын
Loki?
@emanuelmota7217
Жыл бұрын
"Hard a-starboard"?? Didn't they hit the iceberg on the stasrboard side? Would they not have wanted top steer hard a-port?
@Gvlogs200
Жыл бұрын
hard a starboard means swinging the stern to the starboard and reversing the engines (full a stern). This is visa versa for hard a port. So the ship was swung hard a starboard to attempt to avoid the iceberg from the front and following that it was kicked hard a port to attempt to kick the stern away from the berg. the hard a port call was made following the collision with the berg. The titanic hit the berg scraping along the side however due to the hard a port, the damage was much lighter.
@westerlywind1035
Жыл бұрын
@@vincentvanderhyde That make so much more sense now, thank you!
@jomac841
Жыл бұрын
Ships were turned based on tiller commands, so the tiller is what was used to turn a ship. To turn a ship to port you would have to pull the tiller starboard. So basically whatever turn you wanted to make the order would have to be opposite. Edit: just saw the far more detailed answer above :)
@andrewstackpool4911
Жыл бұрын
@@vincentvanderhyde BZ. FINALLU someone gets it right. Heaven help us seamen from armchair admirals and lunatics.
@andrewstackpool4911
Жыл бұрын
@@vincentvanderhyde Oh and forget steering cables to the tiller, hydraulics took over
@REVERSe_EDITZ_3235
8 ай бұрын
bro 144k views 💀💀
@Male_46_Is_Bored_EDITZ
2 ай бұрын
HOW DID YOU GET HERE!? ITS BEEN LIKE WHAT!? 2 YEARS!.
@stevenweiler1379
Жыл бұрын
Why couldnt they avoid the iceberg
@keithammleter3824
Жыл бұрын
It was a moonless night and thus the iceberg could not be seen until it was close enough for the lookouts to notice stars being obscured. There are no brakes on a ship - the only way to stop is to put the engines into reverse until momentum is lost. This would take too long, so the only chance is to steer around the iceberg. Unfortunately, First Officer Lightholler, who was in command at the time, gave an incorrect order - he ordered engines full astern (most likely) or engines all stop (less likely). Both orders, since the centre propellor was turbine driven and could not be reversed, resulting in a marked reduction of water flow over the rudder, killing rudder effectiveness. Lightholler was a fool anyway - he would have been given radio messages that icebergs in the area, but chose to continue at normal cruise speed. He should have slowed down.
@Male_46_Is_Bored_EDITZ
Жыл бұрын
@@keithammleter3824 fax bro
@keithammleter3824
Жыл бұрын
@@cathycutchin7092 : That is fact. It was a detail that was unearthed during the Board of Enquiry hearings. The key to binocular cupboard was in the pocket of an officer who was transferred off the ship at departure time and thus took the key with him. However it was not a factor in causing the accident, despite some press articles implying it was. It was a dark night due to no moon. Also, there was no wind, which meant no light from waves breaking against the iceberg. Under such conditions icebergs themselves are practically invisible - but are detectable by the obscuring of stars by their bulk. Binoculars attenuate light intensity, and under such conditions the naked eye is just as good and often better without binoculars. If it was important to issue binoculars, no doubt an officer would have directed the cupboard lock forced.
@rickkinki4624
Жыл бұрын
@@keithammleter3824 Correct. At the last minute, they brought on Chief Wilde as the Chief Officer, demoted Murdoch to 1st Officer and Lighttoller to 2nd officer. The prior 2nd officer left the ship with the key in his possession. That was why they had no access to the binoculars.
@keithammleter3824
Жыл бұрын
@@rickkinki4624 : I wasn't completely correct. In my first post, I wrote "Lightholler" where I meant "Murdoch" in two places.
@miklosgergely2356
Жыл бұрын
This whole Titanic story stinks... And now this submersible...
Пікірлер: 143