The wrath of Charles XII was now aimed directly at Poland-Lithuania. But their leader had a plan! ..A terrible plan. Support us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ExtraCredits
@Pip-Pikacraft64
7 жыл бұрын
Extra Credits can't wait for part 3
@BListHistory
7 жыл бұрын
Extra Credits "arguably better idea: winning" loved it
@user-xp4wx8bv5m
7 жыл бұрын
I am always watching your video! Can you make the story of King Sejong?
@ArtArtisian
7 жыл бұрын
Reminds me a lot of the "HOW I FINALLY TAUGHT THE BIG GUY A LESSON" story.
@sarasamaletdin4574
7 жыл бұрын
Titan are you refering to Augustus loosing? That's a joke.
@MetalHeadViking
6 жыл бұрын
King Charles to the swedish people: "You are going to have so much winning, that you are going to get tiered of winning!"
@personguy7919
4 жыл бұрын
That’s why they started losing because they didn’t wanna win
@GERBERTH-r8y
3 жыл бұрын
😅😅😅
@jorenvanderark3567
3 жыл бұрын
You know what? You're right. KING CHARLES FOR PRESIDENT.
@a-e3654
2 жыл бұрын
(4 year I know but) *tired
@billyboy4283
2 жыл бұрын
Swedish people let us lose we're sick of winning
@shmatts5269
7 жыл бұрын
When you select easy mode and blitz through the campaign.
@yourfriendlyinternetintern4731
6 жыл бұрын
If you played EU 4 , you would know that with 105% discipline as Sweden and a decent general, this can hapen
@Kiloryn
5 жыл бұрын
that +20% infantry combat bonus is pretty neat
@user-uq3um5nq7d
5 жыл бұрын
@@yourfriendlyinternetintern4731 European Union 4?? Why and how did it happen??
@irrelevant_noob
5 жыл бұрын
Drew Senna actually Europa Universalis IV. It's an extremely complex simulation of grand strategy applied to historical starting conditions.
@aname6794
5 жыл бұрын
@@irrelevant_noob R/woosh
@haljoa5165
7 жыл бұрын
"And then he found a new plan, winning." Hands down one of the best lines of extra history.
@DanteTorn
6 жыл бұрын
Comes before "Let's not let a little X stop a Y."
@HarryDaniel31756
6 жыл бұрын
I saw this comment before he said the line
@k50kasatka1
6 жыл бұрын
haljoa s
@LS-oq3qh
3 жыл бұрын
It's like Baldrick from Blackadder saying "I have a cunning plan"!
@Syndicalist
Жыл бұрын
besides "He had thought the one sentece that he needed to think and that sentence was: Cool, now seems like a good time for a civil war"
@Forcystus85
7 жыл бұрын
Fun fact number 1: Augustus II and Charles XII were actually cousins. Fun fact number 2: Poland-Lithuania never declared war upon Sweden in the Great Nordic War, as Augustus could never get the Polish parliament to agree to do so. Instead, Augustus declared war in his capacity as Lord of Saxony. Fun fact number 3: Augustus II was also known as "Augustus the Strong". Irony was a thing even back then, it seems. ^^
@Artur_M.
7 жыл бұрын
I sense a mystery Yeah, it refered mostly to the actual physical strength. Supposedly his favorite party trick was bending (or even breaking) the horseshoes with bare hands. Also he had many kids, mostly illegitimate, with many women. Only eight are officially confirmed, but rumors spoke about nearly 300. I guess that this was also considered a sighn of "strength".
@darksnakenerdmaster
7 жыл бұрын
no matter what, the power of boners is stronger
@Duchess_Van_Hoof
6 жыл бұрын
Ah... That certainly explains why swedish history books keep talking about the saxons instead of the poles.
@Chaika1974
5 жыл бұрын
@Liberty or Death Learn how to spell.
@renatgal2946
5 жыл бұрын
nice to know. But I cant find the duna river in the baltic, can you help here?
@cheerfulpessimist952
7 жыл бұрын
"How to pull victories out of your ass! The official guide." Written by Charles XII of Sweden, "Carolus Rex"
@pierrelindgren5727
7 жыл бұрын
"Losing for Dummies" Written by Agustus II of Saxony
@technician122
4 жыл бұрын
"How to beat the Swedish Navy" Written by Frederick IV, King of Denmark and Norway.
@kiteskingdom6137
4 жыл бұрын
How to be beaten by a child By Denmark Russia and Poland
@Hairysteed
3 жыл бұрын
Step 1: recruit soldiers from Finland
@Karlss61
2 жыл бұрын
Step 2: Let ur Plans be so stupid and impossible that ur enemy has no fucking idea of what the ur doing and then fall like a thunderbolt
@torneko6652
7 жыл бұрын
What do you mean losing isn't a good idea. Ive been doing it my whole life
@Whitlock123
7 жыл бұрын
Give this man a medal... In Losing!
@FamusJamus
7 жыл бұрын
What a loser. o7
@recklessroges
7 жыл бұрын
Sadly you are winning at KZitem comments. So you fail at losing.
@guilhermesfk
7 жыл бұрын
@Maldus Most homeless people I know don't spend much time on YT. Maybe It's just in brazil, but homeless people usually can't even afford food, let alone internet connection.
@TheMcgreary
7 жыл бұрын
Guilherme Sabino a lot of homeles people at least here in Sweden will have a phone and places that offer free Wi-Fi so they can more easily look for work
@gigastrike2
7 жыл бұрын
...Is this kid a tactical genius, or is he just getting really lucky?
@sarasamaletdin4574
7 жыл бұрын
He was kind if a military genius. But he is not really well known because some stuff that happens later.
@gigastrike2
7 жыл бұрын
Ok, I'm having a difficult time understanding if he know's what he's doing, or is just being super aggressive and it keeps working.
@jonathancampbell5231
7 жыл бұрын
He was a military genius AND he got very lucky.
@smejkal1846
7 жыл бұрын
both, he was getting lucky but he was a great tactician aswell, theres not much room for luck in a war, especially not this much luch
@fipse
7 жыл бұрын
He was a pretty good commander but his main advantage was very well trained, very experienced Swedish troops while Russian troops often had little training and very bad moral.
@barleysixseventwo6665
7 жыл бұрын
So many famous and ingenious strategies on this show! The Bull Formation The Fabian Tactics The Hannible Envelopment ...Losing
@unclejoeoakland
6 жыл бұрын
Barley Sixseventwo I have to say that in a certain light, Russia has made a fine art of losing to win- or else, destroying Russia better and faster than any foe could. There's this war with Sweden, there's the Napoleonic invasion and the burning of Moscow, the scorched earth policy of Stalin... For whatever reason, they have made it work!
@HaydenLau.
5 жыл бұрын
@@unclejoeoakland Scorched Earth was coined first during Napoleon
@billdehappy1
5 жыл бұрын
@@HaydenLau. no this is clearly long before as its during 1700 and not 1800 like napolic wars
@HaydenLau.
5 жыл бұрын
@@billdehappy1 The term comes from Napoleon's 1812 invasion of Russia. It was the common military practice of the era for an invading army to forage or commandeer what it needed as it advanced deeper into enemy territory, rather than rely only on its own increasingly long and vulnerable supply lines back to its home country. As the Russian army retreated, Tsar Alexander I ordered the soldiers and inhabitants to "leave nothing [of military or economic value] but scorched earth" in the invaders' path. I said first coined, not first use
@apinla2237
6 жыл бұрын
We polish need to be taught more about Augustus, we could really benefit from his strategic genius
@katiemcdonagh4048
4 жыл бұрын
Ohhhh daam
@domicioannioulpiano6845
4 жыл бұрын
Polish = Resilience. Just like the romans. Doesn't matter how many times you defeat them. They keep coming
@JoniWan77
3 жыл бұрын
@@domicioannioulpiano6845 Losing against a superior force, having no reliable allies helping out and still surviving somehow? That's the most Polish thing there is.
@huntclanhunt9697
2 жыл бұрын
Didn't you try it again during WW2?
@Cloud_that_looks_like_a_cat
2 ай бұрын
@@huntclanhunt9697they didn't attack in wwII, only defend
@scrublord95
7 жыл бұрын
**wakes up** **eating breakfast** **hear report that swedish armies are advancing** "what should we do?" "hmmm have we tried letting them use our cannons to kill us?" "THATS GENIUS" **the battle was a collosal failure** it's good to be king of Poland
@morrishellgrn
4 жыл бұрын
Lithuania
@Donut-fr7is
3 жыл бұрын
@@morrishellgrn its a poland lithuanian commonwealth
@zachly6555
3 жыл бұрын
Im reading this as im at that part of the video lolz
@trollinape2697
3 жыл бұрын
@@Donut-fr7is thats why he said lithuania
@yirkarja2884
7 жыл бұрын
Losing > Winning
@Dasmaster1
7 жыл бұрын
Tried and tested method that took down the mighty Swedish Empire!
@ysersno
7 жыл бұрын
And the Swedish king got unlucky and got shot by a Norwegian soldier in 1718
@FrostSwe99
7 жыл бұрын
OTT-OTT 1 They dont know who shot him...
@libertylemonz7145
7 жыл бұрын
if you kill your enemy they win
@Max_basil
7 жыл бұрын
Hi Indonesia Ball! Where is Polan?
@Duke_of_Lorraine
7 жыл бұрын
"which surprisingly was more men than they were fielding themselves" Infinite manpower, baby !
@Dasmaster1
7 жыл бұрын
Ask Groogy how that worked out for him..
@LFGRETIRED
7 жыл бұрын
A Hearts of Iron has taught me.
@proxima6030
7 жыл бұрын
LFG Mapping Productions A surprise to be sure but a welcome one
@kristofferson6584
7 жыл бұрын
playing china in hoi4 you win using 10 guns per división the rest are rock doesnt mather you have 10 million manpower in the field and a couple million training
@KitteridgeStudios
7 жыл бұрын
I somehow come across you in every history-related comment section...
@MrBigCookieCrumble
7 жыл бұрын
The swedish army had a lot of seasoned veterans but because of the lack of manpower and money usually only 2/3 men had muskets, the other 1/3 had pikes. However this was turned into an advantage. While most battles in this era was a shooting war, you'd line up your lines of infantery and shoot volleys at each other until one side was either outflanked or broke from low morale. The swedish army could not survive these kinds of battles in the long run, because they had such low manpower and as a result was almost always greatly outnumbered. What the swedish army did was cut the whole "shooting"-bit out of battles. They would approach the enemy lines in an ordinary fashion, they line up and wait within musket range of the enemy until the enemy had fired, then they would quickly march (or even run) up to the enemy line while they were reloading and fire two volleys (half the line would fire at a certain distance, the other half would afterwards move ahead of them and fire their shots even closer) almost point blank. Afterwards the entire line formation would immediatly charge into melee. This was absolutely devestating, especially vs the untrained conscripts that usually made up a significant portion of the enemy army, which is why they ususally targeted those first, rout the conscripts and then outflank the veteran forces. Remember what i said about the pikes? If you didnt have a sword your rifle and bayonet was your only proper melee weapon, which is used mostly like a spear, the length of your rifle and bayonet is important in these situations since if you have longer reach you can stab your opponent without them being able to reach you, well, there are no rifles capable of outreaching a pike! You'd either have to charge forward and try and get past the pike, stand your ground and probably get stabbed or you'd back up and avoid the pointy end, in either way this would disrupt your formation making the fight easier for the swedes. The cavalry tactics was also changed into, just like the infantery tactics, into a shock and awe. Instead of skirmishing the enemy cav and trying to find gaps in enemy formations, circling around and harrasing the flanks. The swedish cavalry would form very, very tight formations, the different riders would be knee to knee with each other and charge in a wedge formation straight into and plowing through enemy formations, waiting to fire their carbines and pistols until they were point blank range and then continuing to melee them. I've heard it being described as the musket era version of blitzkrieg tactics. But i personally belive that shock and awe is a better term. This is how sweden's armies were capable of inflicting such enormous casualties on the enemy during most major battles in this period.
@Paciat
6 жыл бұрын
"The swedish army had a lot of seasoned veterans but because of the lack of manpower and money usually only 2/3 men had muskets, the other 1/3 had pikes." Lol, no. At that times you could buy 100 muskets or 1 horse. The reason that Sweden was winning is because noble men, not soldiers fought wars in Poland. They often went to war for loot. The King of Poland had little power and no standing army. The only good thing about the Polish drafted nobles was that they had more horses than the Swedes cause a horse and a saber were the symbols of nobility. Most Infantry formations in the whole Europe had this 1/3 of pike-man ratio and there was no point to change that. If an infantry unit wasnt surprised, a cavalry had no chance getting thru a wall of 3m long pikes. Cavalry was only good for slathering surprised or retreating men. Napoleon Bonaparte quote: "Without cavalry, battles are without result". Thats why you see the Pl, Lit and Rus forces defeated time and time again but coming back for more. For Sweden, a defeated would be much more painful.
@JoelJames2
6 жыл бұрын
Thank you, that actually does help. I was wondering how Sweden was able to field armies like this when they live so far up north, but it turns out they developed military doctrines to make up for such a deficit.
@TheFenderBass1
5 жыл бұрын
@@Paciat Augustus had his Saxon troops mate thousands of them. Not many know this but most of the ''polish'' troops were Saxon not polish. Those who first attacked Sweden at Riga, yeah all Saxon.
@magnum_cx8805
5 жыл бұрын
Mr BigCookie There’s a very good example of they cavalry shock in LOTR: Return of the King, when Rohan’s army arrive at the battle against Mordor
@animo9050
4 жыл бұрын
Hey
@Achillez098
7 жыл бұрын
You gotta give Augustus some credit, few people could suffer so many failures, yet still remain positive and confident of success
@Cloud_that_looks_like_a_cat
2 ай бұрын
Eh, he's Polish. Shouldn't be a surprise. Poles lose so much, yet never disappear. In a way, they're one of the strongest nations.
@TechShowdown
7 жыл бұрын
Sounds like Luigi Cadorna was trying to copy Augustus as much as possible during The Great War lmao
@joseroque8121
7 жыл бұрын
Feels like Hotzendorf deserves that more.
@AlphaSections
7 жыл бұрын
Nah Luigi Cadorna is the master of losing. He understood the best strategies for losing like arracking the same place twelve times, so that the enemy will always know where you are going to attack.
@callehammar2743
7 жыл бұрын
No mr. Haig. Lions lead by donkeys indeed!
@joehoe222
7 жыл бұрын
'It was a very sharp mango, sir!'
@danielreick9904
7 жыл бұрын
Augustus was just trapping the swedish king, but didn't work. Still nice tried of him.
@AxDhan
7 жыл бұрын
oooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhh thaaaaaaaaats why the swedish are so good in europa universalis?
@HARVEE64
7 жыл бұрын
AxDhan The 1600s and early 1700s are the reason Sweden is op in EU4
@samotten9874
7 жыл бұрын
No, Sweden is good because the developers are Swedish so naturally they want to make their home country over-powered.
@blackfireoffire
7 жыл бұрын
Sam Otten not really theyre not biased. Sweden at this time had the best army in the entire world. That's why they're good in euiv
@sarasamaletdin4574
7 жыл бұрын
The Sweden had small number of men and small economy so wars were really expensive. So I would not call it the best army but one of the best.
@Cythil
7 жыл бұрын
Well in Sweden we have long had a faith in quality over quantity. Mainly because we were too poor to actually afford cheap stuff. As odd as it might seem. But the thing is that if you get high-quality stuff you won't have to replace it so often. This goes for the army too. Sweden always had a bit of a low population. So by focusing on having high-quality troops you try to offset the shortage of manpower.
@stardust-reverie
7 жыл бұрын
I love how Charles constantly smiles proudly as if everything he does is effortless and/or he just could not give two fucks about anything.
@solari71
7 жыл бұрын
"soon the iron was beating up both the hammer and the anvil." Pretty clear sign of Epic Fail if I've ever seen one.
@geordiejones5618
5 жыл бұрын
Charles XII is basically Sweden's Alexander what a badass
@impaugjuldivmax
5 жыл бұрын
great comparison.. Alexander to another looser
@spatha2584
4 жыл бұрын
Nice
@randomguy4167
4 жыл бұрын
Ryan Sansaricq Charles XII doesn’t even begin to approach Alexander in any way lmao
@TechSupport900
4 жыл бұрын
I’d more compare Frederick to Alexander, Charles couldn’t even win
@nisselarson3227
3 жыл бұрын
This episode is like, "let the good times roll" for Karl XII, he had/got delusions of grandeur and suffered humiliating defeats after this, had to flee to Constantinople with his main boys where he hung out until he was very unwanted. Returned to Sweden in shame with a MASSIVE national debt to the Ottomans.
@matheusarruda6462
7 жыл бұрын
Charles XII our good and old Carolus Rex was a goddamn genius madman. Voltaire, the fabled philosopher, actually lived in his court during this time and wrote a biography of the man (which can be found on Google docs). According to Voltaire, When Charles XII stormed Polish Lithuanian and he heard the noise of musket fire he cackled maniacally and said "Henceforth, this shall be my music!".
@TheFenderBass1
5 жыл бұрын
Its ''this shall hence become my music'' and I am sure he said this the first time when he heard a volley being fired at the danes on Själland in 1700 at age 17.
@GeneralLuigiTBC
7 жыл бұрын
I'm guessing Augustus wasn't actually _trying_ to lose. I can understand why it's portrayed that way, though; mucking things up that badly can make it look as though you really are trying to lose.
@vetren23
7 жыл бұрын
Wow you are so intuitive, here we all were thinking Augustus wanted to be defeated.
@sarasamaletdin4574
7 жыл бұрын
The story was told oddly here. It could have initially been that Augustus had some plan to lead the Swedes to a trap before it turned out to be just a joke.
@firetarrasque4667
7 жыл бұрын
The words "fired upon their own forces" should never be said in a military sense. The words "fired upon their own retreating forces from their previously encamped position" even less so.
@GeneralLuigiTBC
7 жыл бұрын
I know, right, vetren23? I mean, it's so easy to fall into that trap of thinking that Augustus was some sort of RPG villain whose entire plan hinged on his enemy winning.
@Dasmaster1
7 жыл бұрын
Sometimes reality makes less sense then a joke. Trying to explain what went through Augustus mind would require its own video series and several psychologists as well as therapists for said psychologists before it was done.
@AlvoriaGPM
7 жыл бұрын
This episode had me clutching my sides in laughter. Not literally rolling on the floor, but definitely having to steady myself in my chair to prevent that from happening. Awesome work! Something tells me that the "just keep losing" bit is going to get a segment in the Lies episode given how many people are asking if that was actually the goal or not. Still a hilarious joke, though.
@BleedingUranium
7 жыл бұрын
I definitely agree with this, and I'm also shocked just how many people in the comments seem to be taking things so literally. :/
@---uf2zl
7 жыл бұрын
I admit I took it literally the first time...I thought it was going to be some sort of scorched earth tactics. Them I realized I overestimated the Polish king
@michaeldog123ful
7 жыл бұрын
My favorite part was when Charles just walks up to warsaw and opens the door letting his men
@Turamwdd
7 жыл бұрын
Because it is a valid military strategy in some circumstances. With as messed up as the PLC was at this time, such a strategy could have been viable.
@thedigodragon
7 жыл бұрын
I died at the visual for "Just. Keep. Losing."
@maxmustermann9058
7 жыл бұрын
Augustus the Strong is a pretty fascinating character in his own right, known for breaking horseshoes with his bare hands and fathering over 300 children (one of which even with his wife !). He tried to make his money back from all the lost battles by forcing an alchemist to create the philosopher stone. It paid off because said alchemist discovered how to produce porcelain.
@MeatWork2023
9 ай бұрын
not the philopher stone, just plain gold, like the alchemist was braging about
@Humaricslastcall
7 жыл бұрын
I know Augustus is a laughing stock and all, but the fact that the iron was stronger than both hammer and anvil just made me roll on the floor.
@haradream7394
6 жыл бұрын
3:32 Aww this drawing looks so cute, Charles XII having a snowball fight with his soldiers
@jimzawacki3041
7 жыл бұрын
TO THE SKY *SEE* *CAROLUS* *RISE*
@smschramm98
6 жыл бұрын
No allegiance, I will swear no oath!
@monkeyt1554
6 жыл бұрын
FIFTEEN YEARS HAVE I BEEN WAITING TO SIT UPON MY THRONE
@TheParadoxGamer1
6 жыл бұрын
THEY THOUGHT I WAS TOO YOUNG TO RULE THE LAND JUST AS THEY FAILED TO UNDERSTAND BORN TO RULE MY TIME HAS COME
@thecleitom9497
5 жыл бұрын
I WAS CHOSEN BY HEAVEN!
@sweaterketchup2730
5 жыл бұрын
SAY MY NAME IN YOUR PRAYERS
@compatriot852
7 жыл бұрын
I hope we can cover Poland Lithuania more
@Zatrakus
7 жыл бұрын
And maybe with slightly less salt :/
@HARVEE64
7 жыл бұрын
Compatriot Their history is really interesting to me. I hope we get a series about some period in their history sometime.
@legionxiii8055
7 жыл бұрын
Compatriot Winged Hussars hype!
@Awalys
7 жыл бұрын
Poland-Lithuania only started to become absolute garbage in the second half of the 17th century. It's a shame that these videos capture us in the worst period imaginable. (aside from the 19th century when we basically didn't exist)
@Zatrakus
7 жыл бұрын
At the very lest they could have explained the reasons behind those failures instead of making it into one long joke, which apparently confused a lot of people.
@rhyzvanic3660
4 жыл бұрын
You have to admit, asking the enemy to open the door is a big brained military genius
@DefenderoftheOctoberists
Жыл бұрын
Dumb but smart
@yellogames7270
6 жыл бұрын
The thing to learn here: Sweden was fucking badass back then
@SerDerpish
7 жыл бұрын
Charles XII sounds like he should have a "Great" in his title somewhere. Any person who takes point leading his or her troops into battle (literal or figurative) is the hallmark of the best kind of leader
@TheFenderBass1
5 жыл бұрын
He lost the war though so Peter got the title instead
@skyskater7909
5 жыл бұрын
Yes I think he should have that title as well
@ragnarrahl
4 жыл бұрын
If he hadn't been born a king, but a lesser noble, and the king were merely average, he would be an ideal general, and we would be talking today about that king as "The Great." The trouble is that leading troops into battle was the only thing he lived for. You can't have someone like that deciding which fights you're going to take. Because then the decision is going to be "Take ALL the fights." And that's just not going to work.
@penguinstrophe
4 жыл бұрын
This was his titles combined into one phrase: We Charles, by the Grace of God King of Sweden, the Goths and the Vends, Grand Prince of Finland, Duke of Scania, Estonia, Livonia and Karelia, Lord of Ingria, Duke of Bremen, Verden and Pomerania, Prince of Rügen and Lord of Wismar, and also Count Palatine by the Rhine, Duke in Bavaria, Count of Zweibrücken-Kleeburg, as well as Duke of Jülich, Cleve and Berg, Count of Veldenz, Spanheim and Ravensberg and Lord of Ravenstein. I think that's long enough
@josefjusufssob4351
Жыл бұрын
@@TheFenderBass1 he could of won the war If he accepted russias peace treaty. Greed defeated him just like Napoleon.
@FWDDGS
7 жыл бұрын
Wow! Who would have thought that strategy wouldn't work... I'm absolutely baffled!
@adelaestrella3338
6 жыл бұрын
Ya i know right!(sarcasam levels 5000)
@adamdao4826
6 жыл бұрын
I know! It’s incredible!
@ferdinandfoch7816
7 жыл бұрын
Frozen ground Ride with the wind Emerge from the gunsmoke like demons Rehnskiöld’s men Charging their flanks The enemy trembles with fear One by one the Saxons disband Or die where they stand Killing ground Even though you surrender Turn around You will never survive Killing ground At the battle of Fraustadt Fall in line Battle formations Show no fear Riding them down Break their will Show them no mercy Caroleans attack Round them up, look into their eyes They beg for their lives See the Caroleans standing tall All for one and one for all Enemies fall at their feet Begging for their mercy See the Caroleans standing tall Conquer lands and slaughter all Enemies fall at their feet Victory and great defeat
@williamhaward1140
7 жыл бұрын
I love how theres always someone in these comments reminding me of Carolus Rex
@FishAnimations
7 жыл бұрын
What?
@williamhaward1140
7 жыл бұрын
Its the lyrics to Killing ground by Sabaton they did a whole album on Charles XII
@madijeis4320
7 жыл бұрын
Get ready the Poltava Lyrics for next episode m8
@Tytoalba777
7 жыл бұрын
William Haward correction, they had a whole album for the Swedish Empire. Carolus Rex just happened to take up half of it
@peroxide8823
7 жыл бұрын
Dorothy: Just keep Swimming! Augustus: Just keep Losing!
@wheretwowillgather4057
3 жыл бұрын
The writing is hilarious and the delivery is perfect. Love how the joke “just keep losing forever” just keeps building on and on while also being fact 😂
@Crystal_Moon248
Жыл бұрын
And with Augustus just digging into a hole is genius.
@blitzkrieg2928
7 жыл бұрын
See the Caroleans standing tall All for one and one for all Enemies fall at their feet Begging for their mercy See the Caroleans standing tall Conquer lands and slaughter all Enemies fall at their feet Victory and great defeat
@greninjamastergabe6452
5 жыл бұрын
Killing ground Even though you surrender Turn around You will never survive Killing ground As the battle of Fraustadt turns The last battle mentioned in this video actually was Fraustadt. So you commenting that was quite fitting.
@iexist2682
4 жыл бұрын
WHILE EUROPE SPEAK OF PEACE ALL OTHER BATTLES CEASE! THERES A MAN WHO AIMS FOR MORE THAN HE CAN REACH! 1648-SABATON
@soft_er0030
4 жыл бұрын
Some Thing it’s about 30 years war
@dumbnewyorker7379
4 жыл бұрын
SEE THE WHITES IN THEIR EYES CAROLEANS ARE MARCHING ON
@firstconsul7286
3 жыл бұрын
TILLS HAN VITÖGAT SER, KAROLINEN MARSCHERAR FRAM
@sol2544
5 жыл бұрын
This series seems to focus on the quality of strategic decisions, but seems to forget just how impactful the quality of the soldiers was. In my limited knowledge, what I know is that the swedish troops were extremely well disciplined, to the point of marching straight till they could see the whites of the enemy's eyes, which requires an extreme amount of discipline as it honest-to-god was a miracle to convince soldiers to do so without breaking from the casualties they would sustain. This may seem counterintuitive, as people may think, "so they can march somewhere when being shot at, that doesnt stop them from dying", but from a strategic view, the ability to trade some increased casualties in turn for being able to attack a key position was extremely vital in warfare, and could turn battles. This is due to how warfare worked back then. Most losses occurred not from units being slain to-the-man but rather when soldiers routed and ran *because* of their fear of losing a fight. When you have soldiers that can fight much longer despite losses around them, or despite a high chance that they could die, you could find scenarios such as a small amount of brave soldiers being able to overrun artillery guns, or cavalry that disrupt a key portion of an army to win a fight, at the cost of their own lives. Personally, the quality of men was as effective as any amount of strategy. After all, the earlier episode saw the Swedes fighting 1 to 4, on the offensive. Something never before heard of except for defeat-in-detail tactics. An undisciplined army couldnt have been able to be convinced to commit such an attack, which could make such a victory, and other victories, impossible no matter how good your general's genius is. Another more modern example could be the polish during WW2. To my knowledge, there was a fort or so that was heavily outnumbered (700 or so defenders against tens of thousands of soldiers, helped by tanks and bombers) That army was halted by those defenders for several days, which is, from the viewpoint of a general who is in desperate straights, an extreme victory considering the tactical advantage gained from halting an entire offensive for the price of those men, even if all of them became casualties. Needless to say, the quality of training matters a lot in a fight
@newdrug1880
4 жыл бұрын
Good point
@eyuin5716
7 жыл бұрын
Did he seriously think that continuously loosing was a winning strategy or was that added for comedic effect?
@alphawolf4643
7 жыл бұрын
I think it was not that he couldn't win, but that he was just so bad at war, and he never really ended up winning.
@dhasenan
7 жыл бұрын
An argument for him having a strategy of losing is that a civil war is a chance to topple the old political institutions and instate a stronger monarchy.
@danielreick9904
7 жыл бұрын
As EU4 player you should know more about the HRE. You can consider it a strategy after the treaty of westphalia was installed 50 years before. A war declaration against saxony would have brought in the entire empire. So perhabs he was aiming for this or for at least using the saxon army in this war, as he could not as the war was between PLC and sweden. So no realm troops :D
@poggies7639
7 жыл бұрын
Daniel Reick HRE didn't work exactly like the game just similarly, they obviously had to simplify The HRE for the sake of the game
@bluemountain4181
7 жыл бұрын
And Austria was already caught up in the War of the Spanish Succession
@byteofbacon
7 жыл бұрын
Augustus: Okay men. I have a great plan. This army moves in to lose against the Swedish. This army makes it obvious that Russians are part of the army and rout. This army gets encircled. All of you will lose many men. That's the plan. Ghost of Scipio: *Slow Clap
@philiphunt-bull5817
6 жыл бұрын
“Now he had a better plan. He would just keep losing even more.” I love this show.
@kered13
7 жыл бұрын
The problem with dragging out the joke about Augustus trying to lose is that you aren't telling us WHY the Swedes were able to win again and again.
@comradekali5025
9 ай бұрын
They… They are? They told you that they had their artillery turned against them, not that he just “decided to lose lmao”
@1987MartinT
7 жыл бұрын
Charles XII of Sweden may have often been naive and filled with youthful overconfidence, but he could also be shockingly brilliant and tough.
@thunderbird1921
3 жыл бұрын
What a century the 1700s was. At least five of the greatest military leaders in all of history within 100 years: Charles XII, Peter the Great, Frederick the Great, George Washington and finally the rise of Napoleon.
@AnonyMous-ql9nj
3 жыл бұрын
@@thunderbird1921 George washington would be a great stretch but sure.
@austinford1530
Жыл бұрын
@@thunderbird1921 Washington is a huge stretch as is Peter
@Handles-Suck-YouTube
Жыл бұрын
@@austinford1530 Agreed. Peter was certainly a competent commander, but a brilliant one? No. As a ruler of his nation though, he does deserve his title of the Great, I reckon.
@LucianoThePig
7 жыл бұрын
I'm confused. Did Augustus intend to fail so much, or is the joke that he fucked up unintentionally so much it's like he was trying to fail?
@LucianoThePig
7 жыл бұрын
Yeah sorry
@moarice509
7 жыл бұрын
The second thing.
@Kabitu1
7 жыл бұрын
Agreed, if this is sarcasm it's played way too straight to be easy to decipher.
@andriuspakulis2948
7 жыл бұрын
He tried to weaken nobles, which had real power in Commonwealth, and with his own trooops and supports of russians become absolute king.
@Dasmaster1
7 жыл бұрын
Lets just say he is not a very popular figure in that countries history and that his incompetence combined with Augustus II basically destroyed the nation. He might classify as one of the most inept rulers ever in European history in fact and much of it is because of the electoral system in place and how it was corrupted by foreign influences to enact puppet kings. As we all know you dont want a skilled puppet king or he would not serve you or your causes.
@Snowy123
7 жыл бұрын
Jesus is Charles a god of war?
@Wrenneru
7 жыл бұрын
1. No, that was Genghis Khan 2. It was more or less the actual quality of the soldiers then Charles
@HAHA4625
7 жыл бұрын
He had Gustavus Adolphus to thank for the elite troops he had at his disposal. Not to discredit him entirely, he was still a good commander and leader, but he lost Sweden the war by refusing any treaty that wasn't a complete victory.
@HAHA4625
7 жыл бұрын
Inconclusive because he didn't gain anything strategically from those victories. If he had signed the treaty with Russia after defeating their army he could've won.
@maxygurl2731
7 жыл бұрын
no hes just Swedish
@marcooosbibendorsht1334
6 жыл бұрын
Square Square Triangle Kick Poland's ass
@thomasransdell1674
7 жыл бұрын
You have to put Sabaton into one of these videos, it's of paramount importance.
@eedwardgrey2
3 жыл бұрын
Killing Ground would be a good one for this
@ThatIcelandicDude
7 жыл бұрын
Killing ground Even though you surrender Turn around You will never survive Killing ground As the battle of Fraustadt turns
@firstconsul7286
3 жыл бұрын
Gjuter blod Möter döden vid Fraustadt Syndaflod Genom fiendens led Gjuter blod Ingen nåd kommer givas, där
@Rynosaur94
7 жыл бұрын
This kinda portrays Charles as someone who just stumbled into victories.
@Dasmaster1
7 жыл бұрын
Partially true.. I mean he did fight against Augustus.
@samlund8543
6 жыл бұрын
I mean, it doesn’t take much to look that way when you fight Augustus...
@viikmaqic
6 жыл бұрын
Well he crushed the danes and russians too.
@Duchess_Van_Hoof
6 жыл бұрын
He was a lot like Alexander the great. Raised from birth to be a warrior king, deified by his men and leading the most advanced and best drilled military force in the known world. So it was a bit unfair to his enemies.
@emptyforrest
6 жыл бұрын
its like playing total war war fielding an army of the best units while going up gainst tier one units and just crush them with superior skill, tactics and morale.
@jaypillsbury843
7 жыл бұрын
This is a good plan! Narrator: "It was not a good plan."
@DrIzixs
7 жыл бұрын
Gotta love that Swedish +5% discipline idea.
@EdVarkarion
5 жыл бұрын
And now I realize why the Great Northern War is almost never talked about in Poland.
@starboys3407
4 жыл бұрын
Yep
@EdVarkarion
4 жыл бұрын
@@starboys3407 polakiem jestes ?
@starboys3407
4 жыл бұрын
@@EdVarkarion nie
@neBeeYsia
3 жыл бұрын
3:30 No one's gonna talk about how dang cute this moment is? 💕
@DavidELD
7 жыл бұрын
Polandball: Poland can into empire? Swedenball: No.
@sadlobster1
7 жыл бұрын
I just realized...Charles the 12th is the Carolus Rex figure Sabaton sings about in their song. From what I've heard in the comments section of said song. Charles was said to be one of the greatest leaders of all time
@Dasmaster1
7 жыл бұрын
Well one of them maybe but he is far down on a long list with many other Swedish kings above him.
@Leaffordes
7 жыл бұрын
He surely stood out in the tactical aspects as one of the best, not as good when it came to stratergy (but still good) and lacked in diplomacy
@sadlobster1
7 жыл бұрын
I also realized that Gustav is the Gustavus Adolphus from the Sabaton song, The Lion from the North
@smiles5168
7 жыл бұрын
The scissors of loss loosing needs to become a regular gag
@smiles5168
7 жыл бұрын
*scissors of loss cutting
@adelaestrella3338
6 жыл бұрын
Redsand how?
@rebeccaennas5695
5 жыл бұрын
If only the Swedish Empire responded to the letters the Empire would have lasted longer than it did R.I.P Swedish Empire
@hefestus2012
Жыл бұрын
4:45 the way they worded this is hilarious to me. I’m just imagining the officers going: “What is the king doing? … Oh, @&$? !”
@Artur_M.
7 жыл бұрын
Honestly this is a bit disappointing. You only briefly mentioned Saxony once, without any indication that Augustus was it's ruler (beside and before being Polish-Lithuanian king). This is kind of important, as he started the war without the approval of Polish-Lithuanian diet (sejm), and for example all of the "Polish-Lithuanian" troops and commanders you talked about in context of the crossing of Düna were actually SAXON. Many Polish nobles were understandably angry with their foregin king for dragging their country into his stupid war, which puts the start of civil war and Swedish-backed anty-king in different context. BTW You could mention the rival king's name. I know that Stanisław Leszczyński looks intimidating, but you could at least take a shot at Stanislaus (commonly used in English latinisation of Stanisław).
@Gew219
7 жыл бұрын
Artur M. ^This. I agree with you wholeheartedly.
@c4blew
7 жыл бұрын
Pfft, Saxony...they may have been Saxon by name/title but those thuringian-slavic pretenders will never be real Saxons!
@Artur_M.
7 жыл бұрын
c4blew OK, the Electorate then, that is kind of beside the point here.
@c4blew
7 жыл бұрын
Artur M. Yeah, sorry that was just a general rant of frustration that had nothing to do with your point...sorry for hijacking your post!^^
@Artur_M.
7 жыл бұрын
c4blew No worries, I get it :)
@stevenchoza6391
7 жыл бұрын
This kid would do pretty well in GoT. Imagine if he had been King Robert's successor.
@despadas
7 жыл бұрын
I think Augustus' mind is too complex for me
@midimusicforever
4 жыл бұрын
Some fun trivia - Karl XII, Carolus Rex, or Charles the Twelfth, was actually NOT the twelfth Swedish king named Karl. Karl the 9th should have been Karl the 3rd, but some mythical kings who never even existed were taken into account when denominating as such. And then the rest followed. Our current King, Karl XVI Gustaf should be Karl X Gustaf, and the protagonist in these series should have been Karl VI.
@TheMadRatKing
6 жыл бұрын
These Swedish just keep winning, and I love how easily they beat the odds. The image of Augustus digging his own grave still kills me, though.
@Hostilenemy
7 жыл бұрын
Great Northern Lion.
@spreadthewordofwalpole9737
7 жыл бұрын
The great northern.... cub?
@carolean4360
7 жыл бұрын
Carolus Rex!
@talltroll7092
7 жыл бұрын
What's the Scumegg got to do with any of this?
@stevenchoza6391
7 жыл бұрын
Maybe the Great Northern Wolf?
@pliniomelo6295
7 жыл бұрын
Hostile EGGSCUM!
@giorgosvr09
7 жыл бұрын
Probably the funniest episode you've written so far!
@thelunaticcultist5157
2 жыл бұрын
ever.
@erenoz2910
7 жыл бұрын
But who put losing in Augustus' mind? Did he put this ingenious and cunning plan together by himself? Or was it Walpole?
@willjelle7944
7 жыл бұрын
"Sire, what is you plan?" Some random Officer "We shall loose every.God.Damn.Time" Augustus "Please no..." Officer
@Lightning_Toad
7 жыл бұрын
I'm sure that James had an even greater hand in the writing of this video than normal. It's very much filled with his brand of humor.
@Duke_of_Lorraine
7 жыл бұрын
Augustus' advisor : "my king, do you remember those absurdly OP winged hussars that kicked the Ottoman's asses 20 years ago and were great at beating the Swedish during the Deluge ?" Augustus : "nope, I won't use them"
@funnyjupiter4499
5 жыл бұрын
I think it wouldn't have made a difference since the Swedish army or the Carolean army was one of the best if not the best Army in the world at the time. They also was more modernised than the PLC and had better generals. So they were only used for some battles.
@real_yunicellular
2 жыл бұрын
They actually used them, at Kliszow but failed.
@cjhui7633
7 жыл бұрын
who would have guessed that genius strategy of losing we end up with you losing.
@badoodadoodadoo7653
5 жыл бұрын
Augustus: “OUR MEN ARE FLEEING THE BATTLE! SHAMEFUR DISPRAY!”
@Yourlocalwordrobe
Жыл бұрын
poles getting slammed again for the 77788989743849023th time:This is fine
@pegzounet
7 жыл бұрын
It would be nice if you could elaborate in "lies" about that swedish military edge. Organisation ? Troop/officer quality ? Tactics ? Hardware ?
@banaroklionrage9536
7 жыл бұрын
was a bit of all, sweden was warring pretty much ALL the time so their veterans were used to combat, their tacticans and generals had lots of practice and Sweden spent a lot of money on the military.
@PraetorianOverlord
7 жыл бұрын
Generally the Swedish troops were all standing, trained military veterans. Their officers had experience and were very well organised. And their tactics were VERY aggressive. They would advance towards the enemy, take the first volley and keep advancing, then halt right in front of them. Pretty much hit them point blank, then charge them with the bayonet and sabre. It was a very effective shock tactic.
@Pikkabuu
7 жыл бұрын
Also very aggressive tactics while other commanders tended to be more careful and so weren't ready to really oppose heavy Swedish attacks. And multitasking ie. most troops in the Swedish army could be used as cannoneers. So the Swedes could put any captured cannons immediatly in use.
@RacconAndMT
7 жыл бұрын
All of it. Swedish copper mines produced top quality metal for the cannons, the Lutheran Church had been co-operating with the government's war efforts ever since the Thirty Years' War, not only keeping accurate records of how many men can be conscripted from where, but also sending priests who participated in battle and kept up military morale, the soldiers were regularly drilled and were required to observe strict discipline in camp, and Swedish society itself was highly militarised, making it hard to get anywhere near the top without military expertise (as opposed to Poland-Lithuania, where aristocrats powerful in their holdings and the parliament wrestled for the army's control). Their tactics were also top-notch since Gustav Adolph reformed the army for the 30 Years' War (where he developed the perfect answer to both the tercio and the schwarze Reiter, changing the face of 17th century warfare), reforms which Charles XII's father, Charles XI further improved on. While the infantry of most European armies at the time usually stood in place in battle and traded disorganised shots with the enemy for minutes or even hours before a long and drawn-out charge, the standard tactic of Carolean infantry was to steadily march (later run) through the inaccurate medium-range fire, exploiting the long reload time of muskets, especially in the hands of untrained soldiers, then unleash one (or two, the tactic was modified during the war with Russia) volley at extremely close range (first usually at around 50 meters, later at around 15 meters), and to then charge the enemy line, experienced Swedish soldiers winning out in the melee over conscripted peasants, sending the enemy into a panic and rout. Carolean cavalry was likewise offensive, and while it wasn't as revolutionary as it had been under Gustav Adolph (because the rest of Europe caught up by then), their aggressive attacks, use of the wedge formation (while most European armies still had cavalry forming up knee-to-knee), and emphasis on sticking to melee weapons when charging still made them much more effective than the cavalry of most European armies. The Swedes also employed expert light cavalrymen from Finland (and occasionally vlachs and cossacks), well-versed in tactics that proved highly effective against the regular army of Austria during Hungary's war of independence under Prince Ferenc II Rákóczi, which could scorch the earth under enemy troops, conduct guerrilla-style attacks, and provide valuable reconnaissance. This also made their cavalry superior to most Western armies, however, this doesn't really show in the Great Northern War, as the Poles themselves employed such units, and so did the Russians (when the cossacks weren't revolting). However, had the invading army been any Western one other than the Swedish, its lack in light cavalry would have shown, and it would have been devastated between battles by the raids of Polish and Russian light cavalry.
@Dasmaster1
7 жыл бұрын
Troop and officer quality goes a long way. They also had a some more advanced tactics although their hardware was a bit subpar because of their weak economy. Their biggest advantage was using fear tactics against their opponents while simultaneously almost making their own army immune to fear. Not only do most armies scatter before there is allot of losses but an army that does not scatter is even more terrifying. Combining this horrific image with tactics specifically designed to shatter enemy morale like point blank musket volleys and charges and you have a potent weapon.. Also helps that Russians have terrible morale. These fear tactics were specially designed to make the most out of the highly trained and religiously motivated Swedish troops while minimizing casualties because Sweden could simply not replenish them. If the battle ends early because you scared the crap out of the enemy then less of your troops die and the infamy spreads making the next battle even easier to scare them shitless.
@bakersbread104
7 жыл бұрын
Charles is fucking badass
@carolean4360
7 жыл бұрын
He's my favourite king that Sweden has had throughout its history. Him and Gustav II Adolf.
@kevstermeister4662
6 жыл бұрын
Carolean what about the candy loving gustav vasa
@Nick-gf2nj
7 жыл бұрын
"We trained him wrong on purpose, as a joke" Augusts' Advisors and Teachers
@adiyarzharmenov9187
6 жыл бұрын
Charles the XII is super badass commander. He acted like a superhero
@DustinBarlow8P
5 жыл бұрын
The characterization of Augustus was hilarious! I could see a satirical version of this battle either on stage or on tv. Great entertainment!
@slendy9600
7 жыл бұрын
This was a 9 minute long savage roast of Augustus. I approve
@MrBurgeri
7 жыл бұрын
Charles XII is not all that popular in Finland. Much of the Swedish Army was recruited from here and after the Russian counter-invasions the population had dropped by a half.
@sarasamaletdin4574
7 жыл бұрын
Hopefully Isoviha or the Great Hatred (sounds odd in English) is covered here properly.
@Dasmaster1
7 жыл бұрын
Cant fault a man for trying. That said he really did fuck up by the end of it.
@cyber5659
7 жыл бұрын
MrBurgeri Only 50 000 of the 200 000 recruited soldiers were finns. The rest where mostly swedes.
@cyber5659
7 жыл бұрын
Fredrik Dunge He didnt lose the army, Lewenhaupt did at Perevolotjna after Poltava.
@sagal1374
7 жыл бұрын
he/she said much, not the majority. 50 000 out of 200 0000 is 1/4th of the entire army which is really a large fraction.
@MathDM329
7 жыл бұрын
Anyone else notice Walpole?
@stephenschlueter8242
7 жыл бұрын
somepersonnamed Bob Yeah, he took away Augutus' sash. Wonder what he plans to do with it.
@mill2712
7 жыл бұрын
Give it to someone more deserving.
@robertwalpole360
7 жыл бұрын
I noticed. ;)
@Healermain15
7 жыл бұрын
What do you think that blue thing is he's always wearing?
@robotic-race
5 жыл бұрын
Dutch: I've got a god damned plan Arthur:is it losein?
@swordsmancs
5 жыл бұрын
“Just keep losing. Forever.” “You gotta hand it to Augustus, he lost like a champ.” Am I living my life according to Augustus????
@LanChrissTV
7 жыл бұрын
And still Augustus is reminded as one of the greatest rulers Saxony ever had.
@vdate
7 жыл бұрын
Well, he does apparently decide to give winning a try later on down the line, so there's still time!
@LanChrissTV
7 жыл бұрын
No, not for his war affords. He is known for his finacing of architecture, art, science and mostly his legendary affairs ^^
@AlatarIstari
7 жыл бұрын
Cause he cared for Saxony and made it prosperous. He didn't care for PLC, he liked the title of king but that's it.
@nattygsbord
7 жыл бұрын
How much money did this guy have? castles, wars, buying the crown of Poland, having party fucking drinking like crazy and even creating an anti-temperance organization togheter with Friedrich Vilhelm of Prussia. Seems like this guy had an endless number of expensive hobbies, so where did this guy get all his money from?
@nanaya7e433
7 жыл бұрын
+Alataristari It's not about "caring". The only reason he is remembered as a bad ruler in Poland is because none of his reforms passed because of nobles who opposed him at every turn to keep their golden liberty.
@Heds123
7 жыл бұрын
8:20 When even Wapole is tired of winning.
@felixbabuf5726
7 жыл бұрын
You know, it's weird seeing incompetence being the main focus in an Extra History video.
@KrishnaTej21
5 жыл бұрын
The narration is simply too good...My cheeks are bursting with pain and face is ripe like a tomato from laughing so hard
@eqmonkey28
3 жыл бұрын
4:35 let me guess, KEEP LOOSING!
@Tytoalba777
7 жыл бұрын
Augustus was waiting for the Winged Hussars to arrive, not realizing he was the Winged Hussars
@smalltime0
7 жыл бұрын
Probably the funniest episode of extra history.
@FreedomR115
7 жыл бұрын
Poor Augustus, where are Winged Hussars when you need them?
@DeDerpyDerp_
6 жыл бұрын
guy: "OPEN THE DOOR!!!" (guards): "Wth?" guy: opens them forcefully and lets in 300 soldiers... Guards: " *...* "
@snakes3425
7 жыл бұрын
Augustus: All we need to do is keep losing Me: you just made Don Juan from Tentacolino look like Napoleon by even suggesting that
@CB-lh4ph
5 жыл бұрын
This spawned one of the greatest albums ever written, sabatons "carolus rex"
@LoydAvenheart
5 жыл бұрын
*We are going to beat you with over whelming odds* Sweden: How about no.
@ShinigamiSparda
7 жыл бұрын
There so much sarcasm, it's flowing out of my screen onto the floor.
@avetleeg3654
4 жыл бұрын
The shade thrown at the polish-Lithuanian guy has made my day. 😂
@1003JustinLaw
2 жыл бұрын
Ahh, what an inspirational figure, we should ALL aspire to be more like Augustus! Never win, never give up, winning is for losers!
@Lucas-q2l5e
4 ай бұрын
😂
@crimson4069
7 жыл бұрын
You honestly convinced me for a while that he actually wanted to lose....
@MEW-hn2dn
7 жыл бұрын
"Just keep losing" needs to be a shirt design in the store.
@itwaswalpole5462
7 жыл бұрын
It was Walpole!!!
@robertwalpole360
7 жыл бұрын
Well, naturally. ;)
@callehammar2743
7 жыл бұрын
Indeed!
@robertwalpole360
7 жыл бұрын
We cool?
@callehammar2743
7 жыл бұрын
We cool!
@pressypoo3236
2 жыл бұрын
I was born and lived in Poland all my life... A full-blooded Pole... But only now do I understand the art of being Polish.
@Librarian356
6 жыл бұрын
The sarcasm in this episode is hysterical. 'He thought of the one, great idea that would save anything. Hey, let's start a civil war.'
Пікірлер: 2,3 М.