These days can be said to be the darkest days in the future in Hong Kong. It can also be said that have affected the future of democracy, human rights and freedom of speech in the media in Hong Kong. Great Hong Kong people, bless you.
1993?? Zhou Enlai has passed away for a while. It would be unreal that vice president Zhou had been involved into the proposal. R u sure on that? It does not sound scientific! Also When hongkong was still a colony of the UK, Uk needs to get an approval from China? Does not sound logical... Anyway we don't know what was going on at the time as you say and also the truth of the black and white. Anyway thanks again for trying to answer the questions but... Still as clear as mud, still confused. Thanks again! But i will give your answers to EU foreigners once the questions raised again. Either they think the feedbacks are logical or not, suppose they can do their own research.
Salute to 郭議員. Very intelligent and righteous. He should be President of Hong Kong.
@iambuttman1769
5 жыл бұрын
Clara McClure I hope one day HK can have a president
@andycheung6500
5 жыл бұрын
@@iambuttman1769 HK is dead the momment it returned to China, China just impatient to wait for another 30 years to take all of HK's tax money which is our blood and sweat
@inkofscholarsbayyinaat3777
5 жыл бұрын
bullshit, How can local Hong Kong Chinese , trust American? yellow ribbons, yellow embrela movement. They are working for western evil agenda. strong China is very important to stop western evil nations to attack poor nations. first world war, second world war & upcoming 3rd. world war is/will be in the interest of elder Zion favor.
@sammyyung1122
5 жыл бұрын
@@inkofscholarsbayyinaat3777 Zick Zeon
@suibbaba4410
5 жыл бұрын
聽完隻比加超講嘢真係成個禮拜隔夜飯都嘔返出嚟點解做人可以做到咁無恥真係就嚟爆血管
@vincycheng3842
5 жыл бұрын
Sui b Ba ba NO!你侮辱左隻比加超,應該係垃圾 唔係!係垃圾都唔配做
@marcolok6320
5 жыл бұрын
佢不係人,人渣不如
@hkjazzy
5 жыл бұрын
好似周星馳電影功夫熊貓中嘅收租婆😅😂
@bionditseung
5 жыл бұрын
好多人看到後半沒有了字幕,就覺得是有什麼『陰矛』 唔緊要,我補返,下半有,在這裡,但有大量廣東話用詞,括號是我的補充。鄭女仕個一半就有時間再補充,不過聽了都係浪費各位的寶貴生命,無謂喇。 李家超: 請不要把說話放入我口裡(put your words into my mouth 中譯版?) 我話有些人不熟悉我們的條文,亦有些人聽了些錯誤的訊息, 我冇講「有啲法律界人仕被誤導」。 如果法律界人仕細心睇我們的(修訂)法律條文,佢(應該)知道今次的政策、目標呢,係「不是改動成個(整個)移交逃犯制度」。今次政策目標只是做2個目的啫, 第一,將地理限制剔除 第二,將個案移交的啟動比行政長官的證明書去開始 之後的成個(整個)制度、成個(整個)運作,係冇變嘅。係呢22年來,其實法庭都處理左好多這類案件,我地聽唔到有任何問題。而法庭係2003年曾經係一宗移交逃犯耹訊裡面,發覺證據不充份,而即時釋放有關人仕。所以制度的運作,我地睇唔到問題,亦都真真正正係唔適合案件入面,法庭係即時釋放,即時釋放之後呢,就寫上句號㗎,(佢)嘅移交係唔會再進行嘅。 所以係呢方面我地希望大家明白,我係用返現有所有法律制度,去做(逃犯修訂中的)「剔除地理限制」以及「啟動移交(程序),以行政長官嘅證明書」 係2個簡單的改動來嘅。 我地都明白,如果我地要全面去檢視成個「移交逃犯的司法制度」呢,呢個係一個非常大的(改動?)。呢個唔係我地今次的政策目標,希望大家理解。如果係要做呢個政策目標呢,當然會係一個好全面、好廣泛去研究喇,但我地只係希望做呢2個改動啫,主席。 好似好合理,沒有大問題,但其實「魔鬼在細節」。 刪除地理限制,即等如加中國入去。 按現時制度,香港法庭只能以提出移交逃犯方所提出的證據去審視移交是否合理,而不能審視證據是否可信、有否疑點等。 即係話,法庭『不』可以話「我覺你提出的證據、證供有可疑,我要香港法庭審理一下」,香港法庭係『沒有』這個權力。簡單講,香港法庭『只能信,不能問』 所以李局長所提及的『成功例子』,即「證據不足,即時釋放,句號」是不能說明這個修例沒有問題。 點解?well, 中共要你特首移交某人,點會兩手空空而來,叫她難做呢,實有足夠的『完美』證供㗎,係咪。 就算一次提交唔得,作兩次、三次…。作到你法庭滿意,有幾難。 啊,唔係『作』,係『搵』,我點可以詆毀我地偉大祖國裡,那群每天為正義、公平公正,面對種種危險、艱辛而努力的執法人員呢。佢地一定不會為了最高的在位者的個人需要而誣陷(老屈)他人嘅,絕對唔會。我有感耿爽先生一定會咁講。 所以當『完美』證供來到法庭,法庭既沒有權力審理證供合法性,只能批准移交。 呵呵,到時大條道理話佢跟足現有法理、法規做事,你地仲要上街鬧事?簡直就是暴民作風,一定是被西方自由思想所毒害。 你耐佢咩何?
Hello Mr. Kok, I enjoyed your discussion. Your speech is awesome and eloquent. Your line of questioning is direct, thorough, succinct and have a sense of humor. You are a Chinese Ben Shapiro from Daily Wire. Thank you so much.
@@TheBbansoniou Well sail. Support : "叫啲贊成嘅律師提出理據同反對嘅律師公開辯論囉" x 2 .
@alphabetacanton
2 жыл бұрын
Oh, we could "rely on the Chief Executive to stop extradition if human rights of the defendant could be at stake?" Oh, that was a ton of weight off my poor, fevered, silly mind! Thanks so much for all care and compassion our Chief Executive is so famous for.
Пікірлер: 2,4 М.