Windows XP will always have revival tries, no matter what i hope in the future there will be a community making updates for windows xp to keep it alive for us to enjoy
@lillywho
11 ай бұрын
I don't actually have the numbers in front of me, but you're potentially forgetting about Professional x64 Edition's altered limitations. I remember using it for shits and giggles on my main rig, which at the time consisted of an i7 3770k, 16GB RAM and a GTX 970, and I didn't notice any issues with core count or RAM.
@kevinsahm5577
11 ай бұрын
mypal 68 is being updated for windows xp as well as roy tam browsers based on firefox so there are those choices that still get updates
@BALtimore2001
11 ай бұрын
RoyTam's browsers are probably the "most secure" for XP nowadays.
@Akahigep
11 ай бұрын
In my experience, XP on SSDs is a great experience. far better than a HDD. I use a cheap SSD for the OS and a 2TB HDD and works like a dream. Full of games of XP era and compatible W98 software too :)
@PineappleForFun
11 ай бұрын
XP doesn't implement TRIM, so there's no limiting or batching of writes, and there's no wear leveling or communication between the SSD and the OS about what actual cells are being written. Hard drive failures are almost always mechanical and nearly random. SSDs fail electrically. Each memory location will have a ballpark number of writes before the circuit degrades to the point it's no longer usable (usually see this as 'write endurance' and seems to be between 10k and 35k writes before the cell gives up the ghost, with the higher end of the range for 3D nands and the lower end for regular flash nands). Modern OSs and drives communicate about that via TRIM and will do things that preserve drive life. It limits the number of writes and makes an effort to spread those writes around to different memory cells so it doesn't just repeatedly hammer the same cells over and over again. In an age where a 128 gig SSD is legitimately like 10 bucks this may or may not matter, I'm not going to say it's bad or you shouldn't do it. Just want people to know that you should expect drive failures earlier then you would on a modern OS so keep a backup image updated regular and keep a spare drive hanging around in the drawer.
@Akahigep
11 ай бұрын
@@PineappleForFun I understand the cons, of course. But the casual use of retro-gaming, the speed and the prices of SSD make for me the difference. Anyways, thanks for the deep explanation :)
@beickus
10 ай бұрын
@@PineappleForFun trim - good point
@bertnijhof5413
11 ай бұрын
In March 2010 I installed and activated Windows XP Home in a Virtualbox VM. I still use that XP almost daily as Jukebox to play the wma copies of my CDs and LPs with WoW and TrueBass effects :) Windows XP survived 2 Virtualbox owners; 3 desktops; 4 CPUs (Pentium 4 HT; Phenom X3 8600; Phenom II X4 B97 and Ryzen 3 2200G). I use it with 1 core; 1GB of memory and I use Firefox ESR 52.9 browser and for me all works fine. Say once per year I use Google Sketchup 8.0 and Microsoft Office 2003 for existing old documents, like drawings of the house or my last CV from 2010. I run the XP-VM from a nvme-SSD.
@adultlunchables
11 ай бұрын
Awesome video! Be warned though guys, none of this is safe for connecting to the Internet.
@lillywho
11 ай бұрын
6:16 It should be noted that the Windows Update restoration project "Legacy Update" restores the online activation function. If I remember correctly.
@joaquimjesus6134
11 ай бұрын
do you know an audio driver for Windows 98 for MS-DOS(Windows mode) ? do i need change the MS-DOS max memory?
@checkersmith5101
11 ай бұрын
XP Vista all easy to install in Virtualbox but outside virtual environment many things fail badly. I have seen hundreds of videos on KZitem installing Windows XP on the modern PC’s, all of them are installing in virtualbox or another virtual alternatives. Many applications work in such virtual environments but fail outside in real setups. After seeing this I have successful installed XPSP3 and Vista in virtualbox on my AMD Athlon 220GE with Radeon Vega Graphics 3.40 GHz PC but failed outside using USB’s, DVD’s and CD’s
@wartortlerulestheworld
11 ай бұрын
This is an amazing video.
@keepitshort4208
11 ай бұрын
What works on an old laptop with these specs ? System Type X86-based PC Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6400 @ 2.00GHZ, 2000 Mhz, 2 Core(s) Would appreciate thr help 🙌🏼
@adventuresinnostalgia
6 ай бұрын
Windows 7 would probably be your best bet on a system like that. Unless the ram is very limited, then Windows XP would be a better option
@matthewfuller9760
11 ай бұрын
Compared to xp, I wonder what limitations will exist for legacy windows 10 users after support ends in 2025? Its odd to think my current experience right now has limitations compared to my future PC even though now everything seems completely fine.
@CCJ1998
11 ай бұрын
It'll be like 7 there'll be 3rd parties, slowly drop off over two years. Windows 7 starting next year won't be able to run a Modern browser or Steam.
@PricklyPineapplesProductions
11 ай бұрын
Unofficially ryzen does work with xp. Though unless you play something like Minecraft everyday usability feel’s basically the same
@g0odnite
10 ай бұрын
Link to you part 1 video please?
@Ed.E
11 ай бұрын
Why not windows XP 64 bit?
@adventuresinnostalgia
11 ай бұрын
Windows XP Professional x64 Edition is very different from Windows XP Pro/Home. It's actually closer to a workstation version of Server 2003. Way back when, Windows NT and W2K had a server version and workstation version very much focused on business. Which makes sense because businesses generally have both servers and workstations. Then there was Windows 98/ME on the consumer side which was more focused on home users. Windows XP _kind of sort of_ merged those two channels until 64bit processors were mainstream. XP Pro/Home was not designed to ever be a 64 bit operating system but Server 2003 was. If you strip out all of the features that make it a server operating system you basically have a desktop operating system... Right? So, the concepts in this series don't equally apply to Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
@Ed.E
11 ай бұрын
@@adventuresinnostalgia Ah, thank you for explaining! Very interesting video.
@MassReflux
9 ай бұрын
@@adventuresinnostalgiaI appreciate this explanation, that said, following this explanation, I would love to see a video of this sort applied to XP x64 Edition
@Chancherpancher
7 ай бұрын
I'm using a Virtualbox on Laptop.
@adventuresinnostalgia
7 ай бұрын
That's a good, safe way to do it!
@Chancherpancher
7 ай бұрын
@@adventuresinnostalgia Unfortunately, one problem I had with my Virtualbox, is that it's kinda laggy. I tried Mypal but it's too laggy. 🫤
@CCJ1998
11 ай бұрын
Yeah, you really just want to use XP for nostalgia and retro gaming. If you want XP like experience with updated modern software choices check out any Linux KDE based distro, you can even it make it look like XP.
@Lofote
11 ай бұрын
Haha true, but would anyone really want that strange XP look :)?
@adventuresinnostalgia
6 ай бұрын
Can it run Crysis?
@JarppaGuru
11 ай бұрын
yes you can it works. just like win10 works even support end. no need go win11+ads. win12 come. win10 was last windows..linux is free....too many distros(linux take advange and make 1 linuxOS+themes(distros))
@pedrocorral1821
11 ай бұрын
MS Office 2000 for XP Alternatives: Libre Office v5.4.x Softmaker Office (or FreeOffice) 2016 WPS Office Free 2016 or v10.2.0.x OnlyOffice Desktop Editors v7.4.x Apache OpenOffice v4.1.x
@adventuresinnostalgia
6 ай бұрын
Thank you for the suggestions!
@TechnoMinded-qp5in
9 ай бұрын
Windows XP is my childhood it looks way better than Windows 10 in honest criticism everything's right there in the start menu and not scattered if I woke up in my childhood to relive those moments I would. I'm running experiments even if it's a USED Windows XP laptop to re experience my childhood. I remember the computer lab in my Elementary School had Windows XP and all the kids we would play games on it on a free game website before the teacher came in. I love the original background as well with the green hill and blue sky it feels like a warm welcoming after you boot it up nice and colorful. If I wanted a casual computer laptop wise it would definitely be Windows XP or desktop the older computers actually did feel like they were better than newer generation techology. I bought a used desktop with Windows 7 already on it and got very lucky finding it it would be for casual computing or casual games made in the early 2000s probably like The Sims and not heavy gaming. If time travel existed in any format I would definitely want to wake up in my childhood and die happy these were the golden ages of computers. If Microsoft runs out of ideas they can always rollback to Windows XP and start the cycle all over again.
@OwnedByWuigi
6 ай бұрын
why not XP x64? the limits there are 128gb ram
@adventuresinnostalgia
6 ай бұрын
64 bit hardware wasn't mainstream in the XP era
@weelebaseknowles4410
2 ай бұрын
U could shut off 2 cores
@adventuresinnostalgia
2 ай бұрын
I'm not sure what difference disabling CPU cores would make, unless you were reducing heat for over clocking. Please explain.
@weelebaseknowles4410
2 ай бұрын
@@adventuresinnostalgia if u run a 4 core and it overclocks I would try it to see if u can more speed in xp and also if u want less power consumption and don’t plan to over clock that work to
Пікірлер: 41