Imagine some scientist telling you that you, specifically, are less creative than an AI. Imagine going to the doctor and they diagnose you with NPC.
@TheBookgeek7
2 ай бұрын
Now THAT was a creative comment!
@mattmarzula
2 ай бұрын
@@TheBookgeek7my lack of creativity is apparent in that I came here to comment the same thing.
@TheBookgeek7
2 ай бұрын
@@mattmarzula hey! Good creativity is WORTH appreciating! Good job!
@Anticho357
2 ай бұрын
@@mattmarzulasomeone being faster than you has nothing to do with your creativity, and if we are going off the information given also has nothing on your originality.
@LordOfEssex
2 ай бұрын
@@mattmarzuladont down yourself convergent creativity does happen, theres even a couple musicians who accidently recreated the same notes as songs they had never heard, being original doesnt necessarily mean only you came up with it or you came up with it first, it just means you came to that result be your own devices, so good on you sir😊
@davidtitanium22
11 ай бұрын
The average human is not trained in creative thinking, while the AI is probably trained on every creative work ever produced, and it still won't beat the most creative human
@user-xc9tt9xh5c
10 ай бұрын
Beat me to it
@Freddy-pp4nc
10 ай бұрын
For now, ai is in its infant stage
@neko6
10 ай бұрын
Yet
@Pirates.27
10 ай бұрын
It will never be, unless the whole program changes and we somehow figure our how to let it have a mind of it*s own. Since now the ai can only collect data, some of which are stolen without consequence and write answers from this piled up data. It can't be better than best humans since it does not have more information that us humans have given it.
@DarkDay2012
10 ай бұрын
You're comparing it to the absolute best we have to offer. If it's better than average it still leaves 4 billion people in the dust. AI that could win in chess was developed decades ago, but no AI could consistently win against grandmasters of the game Go until like 2019. It's not a matter of if. Only when.
@ukkovalta3946
3 ай бұрын
Soon we will have "no ai used!" As a marketing point😭
@SethAshcraft
3 ай бұрын
I'm gonna start using that
@notweewee
3 ай бұрын
But "no ai used" products will be worse than ai used products
@SethAshcraft
3 ай бұрын
@@notweewee based
@orange8175
3 ай бұрын
@@notweewee worse and more expensive!
@Lavafist
3 ай бұрын
@@notweewee Haha no.
@buttergrandma6778
3 ай бұрын
Kind of reminded me of the Yellowstone park ranger that comments about the trash can locks, “there is a considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bear and the dumbest human”
@paulgoogol2652
2 ай бұрын
experience would be the better word.
@RubyCheetahCub
2 ай бұрын
We’d have done even better if creativity and curiosity weren’t smothered in childhood
@Yourlocalscammer11111
2 ай бұрын
Faxx
@anvilsbane
2 ай бұрын
Cautiously agree...
@TheBboyRyujin
2 ай бұрын
That's why I'm a big kid.
@Nocturnus-vv1om
2 ай бұрын
And smothered by religion
@Googahgee
2 ай бұрын
@@Nocturnus-vv1omfacts
@joshuacarre06
11 ай бұрын
I tried to make chatgpt make a story and it just ended up repeating itself basically over and over lol
@hiiamelecktro4985
11 ай бұрын
Yeah, not a great writer. And it’s dialogue is very cringe.
@SimoBenziane
11 ай бұрын
Chatgpt 3.5 or 4? the latest one is waaaay better
@leptoon
11 ай бұрын
Try it again with GPT 4.
@MirMdNasif
11 ай бұрын
I wrote an entire science fiction book using ChatGPT... you didn't give proper command, buddy.
@joshuacarre06
11 ай бұрын
@@leptoon that would cost money which i do not have
@eryalmario5299
4 ай бұрын
Dude, I'm happy with what robot assistants can do. All I ask is for a robot that can do my dishes, laundry, and fold my clothes.
@Sepi-chu_loves_moths
2 ай бұрын
We want robots to do the boring stuff, like taxes, so we can do the interesting stuff, like art, not the other way round
@Sarah_Bragg
2 ай бұрын
Yeah, I want the robot to move my laundry along, not make my drawings for me!
@eryalmario5299
2 ай бұрын
@@Sarah_Bragg i want ai to be able to replace eyes for blind people and ears for deaf people too
@Sarah_Bragg
2 ай бұрын
@@eryalmario5299 That would be awesome! Yeah, tasks humans can’t/don’t want to do is what AI should be focused on achieving, not creative pursuits.
@SilentLovesYou_
4 ай бұрын
they're not "creative", they were trained specifically to SEEM creative
@manuellayburr382
Ай бұрын
On what do you base that? How can you fake creativity? In any case they were not trained to be creative - the researchers were as surprised as anyone else when they discovered what LLMs could actually do.
@isatche
10 ай бұрын
The way I understand the topic is: People invent. Chatbot use things already invented by humans and mix them up based on human imput. I think human over reliance on AI might be an issue where it can create a closed loop, but really special and creative people will always push the world forward.
@snooks5607
3 ай бұрын
AI systems require data of course, we could give it to them or make them collect the data themselves, that's just incidental. so far we usually provide the data for better chance of creating a productive tool quicker but having them gather data themselves would be the more organically scalable method in long term (all intelligences including humans go through phase of being untalented babies but at the moment the industry is moving too rapidly to tolerate delay). saying humans have some kind of monopoly in creativity or inventing is copium, the scientific method is basically a computer program already. read up on latent spaces, connecting disparate topics isn't that hard. in the past overly optimistic people have had disappointments in trying to create AI because the resources simply weren't there but falling back on assumptions based on that would be foolish, like Amara's law says "We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run". even if it might still take more than our lifetimes to create truly independent self-improving general AI doesn't really matter in grand scheme of things, the seeds are germinating, it is happening.
@onionsans
3 ай бұрын
@@snooks5607 You don't seem to understand. AI gets it's information from humans. AI will never do something beyond what humanity has already done. AI does not have the ability to think. None of its ideas or solutions are new, you can find then in the material the AI was trained on. A brain that actually can think will always win against a computer designed by those that can think. The only way AI could ever gather any information is in the way we design it to. It will never exceed the scientific capabilities of humans, it'll just be able to do more experiments quicker. For surveys or other such, the AI would be getting information *from humans*.
@itsgonnabeanaurfromme
3 ай бұрын
Humans require the same thing too. A baby with no training or education will never invent a car.
@onionsans
3 ай бұрын
@@itsgonnabeanaurfromme But the human has the ability to think
@jdsguam
3 ай бұрын
You clearly do not understand the science of AI engineering. This isn't the 90's.
@marcotedesco8954
11 ай бұрын
Creatives are *already* losing job opportunities to subpar AI results! We've been seeing it with book covers, exhibition posters, sometimes even newspaper illustrations. The problem is never that the AI is more creative or proficient, plus it also has an... ambiguous relationship with copyrighted work. The deciding factor is always money, unfortunately 😅
@brook_angel
11 ай бұрын
When they first tried to use machine learning for creative work they attempted it with music. Immediately shut down by the industry. Wish the same could happen for artist.
@BojanTomic
11 ай бұрын
To be honest, graphic designers did get cocky, just like average IT "specialists". Thankfully AI is grounding them a bit. Those who learn how to work with AI will stay successful, though. The most important thing is to embrace the change.
@brook_angel
11 ай бұрын
@@BojanTomic any Ai picture is just an amalgamation of stolen artwork. Just because you can't tell the individual pieces apart anymore doesn't change that.
@naamadossantossilva4736
11 ай бұрын
Learn to code.
@somethinglikethat2176
11 ай бұрын
@@brook_angel isn't that also what humans do?
@XenXenOfficial
4 ай бұрын
As long as AI relies on classical computing it'll never truly get wild like being ACTUALLY creative, or coming up with random ideas on the spot lol
@neverstopschweiking
3 ай бұрын
It doesn't have to be. Look at people on the internet, when it comes to creative thinking most can be easily beaten by the AI. Or by a squirrel. Or by a bucket of fish guts.
@Sepi-chu_loves_moths
2 ай бұрын
The LLM didn't actually come up with new uses for a pencil. It found what someone on the internet had come up with and paraphrased it
@XenXenOfficial
2 ай бұрын
@@neverstopschweiking that's true, but you also need to remember that it didn't come up with anything unique, it built off of already known ideas. You won't find any sort of breakthroughs that way, just advancements which are great don't get me wrong
@sus-kupp
2 ай бұрын
What makes you think that classical computing is incapable of creativity?
@MohammedMahdi8005
4 ай бұрын
Some dude: what can you do with a pencil Chatgpt: you write John wick: 🗿
@firstcynic92
11 ай бұрын
Chatbots are not artificial intelligence. They're predictive text programs.
@AtlasReburdened
11 ай бұрын
You realize that the core utility of the human mind is just as an environment for running predictive algorithms, right?
@brucelin8950
11 ай бұрын
what do you think human thinking works lmao
@superfeel1275
11 ай бұрын
Chatbots work based on statistical tools, but you're brain also can be modelled as statistics too... The rate neurons are firing, localized behaviour, and all other emergent properties are basically statistics too.
@CalebTerryRED
11 ай бұрын
There's nothing in the definition of "AI" that says that it can't be predictive text. We've been calling plenty of less advanced systems "AI" for decades, there's no reason this can't be as well
@superfeel1275
11 ай бұрын
I can go a bit more in depth, but when u want to model the global tendencies of a model, you use ststistics because that's basically what it was made for. You start with random events (or events impossible individually to measure so they might as well be random), make a couple of assumptions, like the firing rate of neurons tends to be localized and periodic, do more analysis like a topological map of neuron activations in your brain, and with statistics you can basically infer what the tendency of the model is.
@mr.kakerudanielvl6496
10 ай бұрын
Correction: The best of us are not out of a job yet
@mattmarzula
2 ай бұрын
When he said "we", he wasn't referring to people like us.
@mr.kakerudanielvl6496
2 ай бұрын
@@mattmarzula Bold of you to think we're doing similar things. But thank you for the attached compliment ,')
@clairen4584
2 ай бұрын
Your 'autocorrect' missed your typo 🙄
@guymanyes4756
3 ай бұрын
Don't forget that the AI have likely been trained on the answers
@manuellayburr382
Ай бұрын
This just shows that you haven't researched how they are actually trained. There are no "correct answers" to a creativity test like there are for say maths.
@guymanyes4756
Ай бұрын
@@manuellayburr382 That is.. entirely irrelevant. People's answers are out on the internet somewhere, if the AI had access to that, it could simply use one of the highest rated ones
@jasonhancox1622
Ай бұрын
@@guymanyes4756 That is not how it works. You may not be aware that the LLMs have come to conclusions they were never trained on through inference. If you are unfamiliar with that check it out it's very interesting.
@beowulf2772
10 ай бұрын
I remember public school in my country trying to "fix" that kind of thinking.
@ragnkja
11 ай бұрын
There’s more than one type of creativity. Are you a “pull new ideas out of thin air” type of creative person or a “put things together in novel ways” type of creative person?
@superfeel1275
11 ай бұрын
Its the same thing, when u think of something "novel" u use preexisting knowledge and mess with it in a new way. Science fiction emerged with the rise of scientofic literacy, go figure.
@maythesciencebewithyou
11 ай бұрын
Every creative person puts known things together. Nobody works in a vacuum
@NastyCupid
11 ай бұрын
Maybe some people can pull creative ideas from other dimensions? 🤔
@udaykadam5455
10 ай бұрын
Unique ideas are extremely rare even in the state of the art science labs with brilliant amongst us working there. Most things, insights or ideas usually fall in the 2nd part you've mentioned
@Meraxes6
10 ай бұрын
@@udaykadam5455 but the minority of actual new ideas make all the difference. Otherwise we’d have no technology at all
@laml545
11 ай бұрын
That just means that a bot, trained using the entire creativity backlog of humanity, has beaten, in some cases, 250 random people. We're comparing robots trained with the best we've ever had, versus random average people. I'm honestly not scared right now
@SyNcLife
11 ай бұрын
Because you think you are above average?
@swickens930
11 ай бұрын
@@SyNcLifeNo lol... what a dumb suggestion, I didn't get that at all reading his comment. He's saying that the average of people, when combined, is smarter than AI because that's how AI works in the first place. If you took the best 1,000 painters in the world currently, they'd beat AI and make less mistakes. Same if you took the best engineers, and the best scientists. AI isn't some existential crisis that's becoming God.
@udaykadam5455
10 ай бұрын
The fact that we are talking this says a lot about your argument already. Give it 3 years from now on, you will realise few things.
@NATESOR
10 ай бұрын
it's funny how the goalposts keep moving, innit?
@BearBrewer-tj3wz
10 ай бұрын
I like how little you guys understand what they’re saying. They’re saying that These chatbots are taking information from some of the most creative humans out there so up against average humans they win. It’s not impressive because the chatbots are just stealing the creativity.
@g-moneyg-life
4 ай бұрын
Humans: "nah, we won"
@Wild-Goober
2 ай бұрын
AI taking over creative projects is 1000000000000000000000% a bad thing bro
@jasonhimmelsteib2996
15 сағат бұрын
You're gonna need a lot more zeros than that.
@Iudicatio
11 ай бұрын
You forgot to mention one very important catch. The chatbot can invent endless answers to an assignment like that, but it has no understanding whatsoever of how objects function in the real world. I suspect that humans avoid some of the chatbot's answers because they understand that these things are not physically possible, or at least highly improbable.
@Tomyb15
11 ай бұрын
The answers they produce require having some internal model of the world. They absolutely do have some understanding of how things work. These algorithms are way more advanced than some simple markov chain prediction algorithm.
@udaykadam5455
10 ай бұрын
Predicting the next word while considering and in accordance of the previous word, sentence, paragraph, page, or book worth of text, these Bots basically ended up learning language, grammar, meaning and semantics. (leaned patterns are shown to also encapsulate the meaning of the text) It works on the principle of the cellular automata,simple rules yielding complex results beyond comprehension, where now predicting the next word at these scales means a whole lot and some sort of understanding is involved to do it.
@udaykadam5455
10 ай бұрын
About the "physical sense and understanding of the surrounding" part, these models are getting integrated into robots that has been given abilities to sense, see and hear (look at the deepmind research) I mean, it's gonna come sooner
@piercexlr878
10 ай бұрын
@Tomyb15 AI does not have any sort of internal model. Just enough training, it mostly avoids dumb answers. It's just a lot of multiplication and addition.
@piercexlr878
10 ай бұрын
@udaykadam5455 But that's not where it's at now. Now it's just a good Googler. Who's only sense of the real word is being told that one idea was dumb so let's not do that and do this slightly more probable one. It just has training. No other probability detector
@rayramos8435
10 ай бұрын
I saw a ChatGpt demo where they asked it to make a painting of Moses competing against the Pharoah's wizards. It showed Moses and the wizards and lighting and was interesting. Then they showed a painting made in the 1700s and it was immediately obvious that it was a masterpiece of composition,lighting and technical skill. While computers can render competent illustrations in seconds,they only compete against your average human scribbler but against true human talent, I think it can only imitate not create.
@uoabigaillevey
9 ай бұрын
Not to say anything bad about your post.. it just occurred to me that since art is subjective.. you are saying that the image the Ai generated was subjectively worse than one created by a human talent. Since it is subjective.. it may apply to you but might not to everyone else. Abstract art, for instance.. to me is horrible art. I much prefer realistic portrayals even if they are of fantasy subjects. This is my subjective opinion, obviously. The point I am making though is that since art is subjective it is impossible, really, to gauge how 'good' an AI is at creating art. The only real metric which could reasonably be applied is to see how much someone would be willing to pay for the art.. and even that is a bad method considering what the majority of art that is highly praised in these days sold for back when they were originally created.
@rayramos8435
9 ай бұрын
@@uoabigaillevey so you are saying that a Picasso is equal to an eight year old's refrigerator drawing? A layman can possibly look at 2 pieces of art and not understand why one is a masterpiece whole the other is not. To make "Art" is much more than just making a picture. There is composition, balance ,harmony ,proportion...an entire universe of things that go into making art. It was obvious to me which was a better image because the human used all these elements and the computer had trouble rendering hands ( despite having billions of examples to choose from). If you truly cannot tell the difference between a computer pretending and human's work,that just makes me sad for you.
@uoabigaillevey
9 ай бұрын
@@rayramos8435 It is not a matter of classifying a work of art by it's use of composition or any of the other things you put forth. If it sucks to look at it.. it sucks to look at it. Picasso is horrible as art in my opinion. I would rather watch paint peel than look at it. It is my subjective opinion.. which by definition cannot be wrong as it applies to only me. That is the point I am making.. you are stating that an 'objective' opinion is to be applied to art.. when art is 'subjective' I am stating that, objectively, you are wrong.
@rayramos8435
9 ай бұрын
@@uoabigaillevey I'm sorry I forgot. You can't cast pearls before swine.
@cormarcormar
9 ай бұрын
@@uoabigaillevey I think the point is that the human moses painting was incredible, it felt immense and powerful, it had a lot of feeling in it, while the AI painting was just kind of the characters standing there, it had no soul because it was made by a machine.
@jacobusburger
3 ай бұрын
A “creative thinking test” is one heck of an oxymoron.
@joe1205
2 ай бұрын
AI would NOT have suggested the pencil moustache 😂
@Kartaal
11 ай бұрын
Creativity is kind of a vague thing, and the test used is actually a case where LLMs can perform 'well'. Not because they have anything resembling understanding of what they're doing but because 'take thing, do something atypical' is at the core of how deep learning functions. Other commenters have also mentioned that the LLMs in question might well have been trained on data that included similar problems. TL;DR: No, AI has not surpassed human creativity, and I strongly doubt they are ever going to as they exist because they are based in remixing what we have already made. That kind of AI can never truly be original, even if we struggle in that regard too.
@superfeel1275
11 ай бұрын
Well I know this argument has been made to oblivion, but your brain also "rehashes" your previous experiences and stimuli. Sure they might be your UNIQUE experiences, but the sheer quantity of knowledge LLMs have can get you a run for your money
@medicinemouse7647
10 ай бұрын
@@superfeel1275except LLMs don't have any frame of reference for what they're spitting out. They're pattern replicators, and we are pattern seekers, so they're very good at initially seeming similar to human output. But until they have senses and ability to reality test, no model will be able to compete fully with any single human. And when they do acquire the ability to gather unique stimuli, the ethics of seeing them as nothing more than tools will come to a head. At this point they're an elaborate parlor trick. Once they're able to actually have novel experiences and test their own spat out nonsense, they'll have crossed over into an intelligence that may be unethical to use without consent to its labor
@ThePowerLover
4 ай бұрын
@@medicinemouse7647 They do have "internal models".
@medicinemouse7647
4 ай бұрын
@@ThePowerLover you seem to be fighting ghosts. I never mentioned internal models
@ThePowerLover
4 ай бұрын
@@medicinemouse7647 You did: _"except LLMs don't have any frame of reference for what they're spitting out."_
@awsomegadgetguy7191
10 ай бұрын
They also did a study on A.I. art where if you keep feeding A.I. art that has been made by A.I. you consistently get worse art. (In other words the A.I. art bots can inbreed and create bad data that we humans still have to sort out and find and create good data for A.I. bots to use.)
@asandax6
3 ай бұрын
So basically Modern Art AI version?
@jesseeganpoirier376
3 ай бұрын
Were the tasks unique or did their exist a wealth of human generated answers for the AI to copypasta ?
@jenkem4464
3 ай бұрын
This has been a problem with humans in any creative space for ages. It's called the commercial "creative" fields of art, music, movies, tv." The artworld is a world of thieves that clone, copy, and mimic on a daily basis with only true originality cropping up every so often when you get someone creating a novel work which will then be copied for another long period of time. AI is no different and it will easily surpass us on all fronts very shortly with only the current human experts in their holding out for a bit longer.
@thefinalboss4471
3 ай бұрын
Inbreeding is bad for basically anything. No surprise there.
@Dave_MB
2 ай бұрын
@@jesseeganpoirier376, I think the issue was that ChatGPT is aggressively average. It’s become very talented at finding enough writing that matches the topic to ‘write’ on its own. But it’s not actually ‘writing’ it. The program is averaging what has been written to give a standardized boring pat answer. But it can produce this standardized generic answer in minutes. When there’s so much AI content out there that its basic input is millions of standardised generic AI content, it’s folding in on itself and created worse content.
@Smenchevieve
3 ай бұрын
I've been pretty impressed lately about how creative it is for game dev mechanics brainstorming
@TheWorldIsDumb
10 ай бұрын
In the end, there were a bunch of humans who organised the test 💀
@playea123
11 ай бұрын
It’s not creative thinking if it’s just learning on that specific subset of questions. That’s just being better at memorizing than humans (shocker) and actually creative humans would always be better. Current level of AI has its uses for sure, but I am not understanding why people want to believe that it’s already better than humans so bad
@superfeel1275
11 ай бұрын
Thats only if they are disgeniune with their results. But, the tendency for ai research is to be frank with your results as any breakthrough will be peer reviewed to oblivion. If researchers want true results, they make up questions that arent preexisting duhhh. Idk why pain a bunch of human subjects if ur going to fake it
@udaykadam5455
10 ай бұрын
The feild is in its infancy and has already surpassed humans in various domains from board games to language comprehension. We overestimate average person.
@playea123
10 ай бұрын
@@udaykadam5455 the average person specializes in a domain or two. Just like these AI’s are specialized based on their training.
@Meraxes6
10 ай бұрын
Because it makes them feel better about their lack of creativity
@mattkuhn6634
10 ай бұрын
It's because everyone who hasn't been studying this for years is stunned by what they are capable of, because until now it was purely academic. The only thing truly new about Chat GPT is that it has a public-facing UI - language models that are architecturally similar have been around for years now. Google searches are driven by LLMs, facebook uses LLMs as part of its text moderation strategy, home assistants like Alexa use them to process things we say to them.
@HeisenbergFam
11 ай бұрын
"we are not out of job yet" Key word: *YET*
@FelipeKana1
11 ай бұрын
And that can only be said for the top human performers. Who probably are more expensive than just using LLM. So yeah the LLM is already good enough
@TheAnxiousOwl
11 ай бұрын
*starts own business* I couldn't hear you over being my own boss and getting out of the worker bee mentality
@Sillyfrog6205
10 ай бұрын
No we already do
@Vlow52
10 ай бұрын
Yep, first it replaces an average jobs, which is a waste majority of people who can’t create anything significant in their field. But then, new models will learn on that generation, so it will probably out stand a far more intelligent individuals being able to merge several layers of expertise into one.
@Eldrick_
2 ай бұрын
I'm a commission artist, and I hate how often I see people choose the free AI option over a craft I've spent my whole life working on.
@pondering_fish
2 ай бұрын
The scary part isn’t how good it is now, but how fast it’s getting better.
@brook_angel
11 ай бұрын
The AI might've just read the problem somewhere before. Recalling information is one of machine learning strengths. ChatGPT isn't smart, it just knows which words are most likely going to appear together in what context. It doesn't actually know what it's saying.
@alakani
11 ай бұрын
You'd like to think that, I'm sure
@Neomadra
11 ай бұрын
that's blatantly wrong and ignores current state of the art research. ChatGPT remembers a lot, yes, but it also builds a world model that is able to generalize. You can show ChatGPT novel problems and will usually still perform better than average people. Building a general world model happens during training because after learning surface statistics it can only become better at predicting the next token when it actually understands what' it's talking about.
@CalebTerryRED
11 ай бұрын
These languages models *can* memorize answers, but their memory isn't nearly big enough to remember all of the things people think they're memorizing. They definitely do better at the types of questions they've seen before, they need to see examples to learn how to solve something, but they are actually learning the solving process, not just the answer key.
@admar1208
10 ай бұрын
that is grossly simplified it's a lot more complex than that.
@brook_angel
10 ай бұрын
@@admar1208 chatgpt works in such a way that it knows which words belong to which subjects and in which order they most likely appear. That's how it was trained. It doesn't know what a door is, just that it's definition is associated with certain words so it will use them when asked to define it. I get that it feels like you're talking to someone, but you're not. It's just very good at guessing what you expect to read as a reply.
@Cory_Springer
10 ай бұрын
Calling chatbots "AI" is like calling those two-wheeled balance boards "hoverboards"
@TheManinBlack9054
3 ай бұрын
This is literally what AI means. Google it.
@MisterDemonYT
3 ай бұрын
Are you tripping? What did you think AI was I'm genuinly curious
@aperson9973
3 ай бұрын
@@MisterDemonYT AI means artificial intelligence. Chatbots do not think, and aren't intelligent.
@MisterDemonYT
3 ай бұрын
@@aperson9973 Ai chatbots are extremely intelligent, GPT 4 outperforms 80% of humans on not only iq tests but pretty much every test that measures intelligence. Your notion that chatbots “can’t think” is egocentrist because you only factor if it can think *like a human* not if it can think *at all*. Because to know if it can think at all we would have to first fully understand the programs, which we don’t. You also didn’t answer my question, which is: if not this, what would you consider AI? Like seriously, if nailing every intelligence test isn’t enough for you what is? Would the AI need to function exactly like a human brain with some sort of a simulation of billions of brain cells or something, I’m genuinely curious.
@onionsans
3 ай бұрын
@@MisterDemonYT In order for a creature to be able to think, it needs to be sentient. AI is not sentient. AI simply is trained to see patterns and report to stimulus based on its training. IQ tests mean nothing to this, since AI only sees the pattern.
@johnfitzpatrick3094
2 ай бұрын
As a truck driver, I keep getting told that AI will put me out of a job. AI can't load and unload a truck, especially when you're out in the middle of nowhere, are the only one there, and you need a key to get in. AI can't fill a truck with diesel. AI can't decipher a State Trooper's hand signals when there's an accident up ahead.
@dextercochran4916
2 ай бұрын
Put enough AI in enough different machines and we'll see about that.
@manuellayburr382
Ай бұрын
The history of AI is humans saying "An AI can't do X", then when it succeeds in doing X, they say, "Oh well, that's not real intelligence, I'll bet it can't do Y" When IBM's Deep Blue beat world chess champion Gary Kasparov back in 1998, doubters said, "Oh well it's just following a set of rules". Rules is how humans play chess! AI eventually beats every challenge we set it. It just takes time.
@johnfitzpatrick3094
Ай бұрын
@manuellayburr382 By the time that happens, I'll either be retired or dead.
@manuellayburr382
Ай бұрын
@@johnfitzpatrick3094 I'm 79. My father was born before the Wright Brothers first flew and lived to see space travel. A lot can happen in a lifetime. You may not be replaced but it wouldn't surprise me if the next generation is. Of course that's assuming we don't get hit by an asteroid or World War 3!
@kris242
2 ай бұрын
They should do an episode of Taskmaster where all the contestants are AI
@theperfectbotsteve4916
10 ай бұрын
AI in 1000 years watching this like "dam people were racist as hell."
@Lu_Ka_Gaming
11 ай бұрын
Let's see where we will be two more papers down the line...
@thatpaulschofield
10 ай бұрын
What a time to be alive!
@TheBlinkyImp
2 ай бұрын
The AI isn't actually 'thinking' of creative uses. It doesn't have concepts like that. It is pattern matching to all the different ways the pencil had been used in the entire corpus of human publication - not coming up with ideas, just repeating them from an unimaginable large database.
@theGhoulman
3 ай бұрын
Why does this remind me of a line in Star Trek. Sensors can only detect things they are designed to detect. Mm? Leaves room for the unknown, eh?
@alexcornflow
11 ай бұрын
When I ask for an idea from gpt I always had to intervene and brainstorm with them. It's like the ai giving me common ideas and I transform it
@nickfifteen
10 ай бұрын
This is what I think will remain the key distinction between AI and Humans. Like, AI is only creative because it was trained on what other people have done... which include creative people. If you train AI on a group of self-admitted UNcreative people, then it's very unlikely that AI will ever do anything creative. Conversely, if you train AI on creative people, then of course it'll be "more creative" than the self-admitted UNcreative people. But that doesn't mean AI can BECOME creative, it just was taught to be creative. AI is and will always remain a labor saving device, but only that. People said the same stuff about how non-linear video editing and Photoshop would destroy jobs because "anyone can be a videographer/artist!"... but obviously those tools didn't replaced anyone.
@minecraftminertime
10 ай бұрын
@@nickfifteenyou forgot one thing, though. Humans are no different. Humans learn creativity from others.
@nickfifteen
10 ай бұрын
@@minecraftminertime Yes but there is a human potential: sometimes creativity comes out of nowhere. Not all creativity came from someone else, and arguably every significant invention of humanity came from a spark of genius that came from nowhere. Even if every story today stems from something else before, if you go far back enough, eventually you'll reach a point where someone say "I just made it up". I argue that AI could NEVER create something from scratch, they could only iterate on what already ever exists (at least, whatever it was trained on). In other words: a human is inspired to make automobiles, AI could only ever make faster horses, because that was the only data it was trained on.
@minecraftminertime
10 ай бұрын
@@nickfifteen what is the biological process behind a "spark" of genius? I think that it is still based on other experiences synthesized together. An AI trained to synthesize other experiences may come up with the same idea. For example, if an AI learns all about horses and physics, and it is inputted to come up with ways to improve humanity, it may come up with a car if it is trained with the objective of improving humanity and its architecture makes it synthesize experiences.
@HY31494
10 ай бұрын
What’s scary isn’t AI gonna out perform human, what’s scary is when human using AI to do bad things to human.
@TheInfintyithGoofball
5 ай бұрын
yep.
@TheInfintyithGoofball
4 ай бұрын
@peez_nuts (I saw your username and it's funny.) is that an insult or a joke? or just an observation? (i always hate the way I speak for some reason so I'm sorry if I'm annoying)
@mr.jitterspam9552
4 ай бұрын
@@TheInfintyithGoofballnot you, the OP! They said "human use it to use bad things to human" like a parody of cavemen
@TheInfintyithGoofball
4 ай бұрын
@@mr.jitterspam9552 I wasn't thinking u were talking to me or saying that I talk like planet of the Apes, I was just asking what you meant by your comment.
@jamiwilliams5885
2 ай бұрын
Like shutting down the world for a projected curve of generated data
@NoctisAquila
4 ай бұрын
It’ll all come down to who can direct the AI to (aid in) crate(ing) something: just like now, you can pretty much search for anything online, but how many people actually search for real thorough academic research vs something much more mundane online? In that sense, even if we end up utilizing AI to create a work of art, instead of picking up ‘traditional’ tools (create a painting, make a movie etc) it’ll still be the same in terms of requiring the same level of creativity to direct AI to do it.
@jal051
3 ай бұрын
It's hard to direct it to something truly creative. It keeps going back to the path already ran. It's in essence a statistics machine which predicts the next step based on the data it has, so the step will always lean towards the known path.
@josueveguilla9069
11 ай бұрын
Nothing the Carrington Event, EMPs, the Sun, etc can’t solve.
@AtlasReburdened
11 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure AI can figure out electromagnetic shielding just as well as humans can.
@somethinglikethat2176
11 ай бұрын
Fun fact: the Pentagon looked into such a scenario, that is loss of the power grid and most electrical devices in a deliberate Starfish Prime event, 98% of people would die.
@theveganduolingobird7349
9 ай бұрын
@@AtlasReburdenedit can only figure out what we already know. That’s like me saying I know everything and everytime I’m asked a question I pull up google
@happily_blue
Ай бұрын
2010s: Computers on Jeopardy 2020s: Computers on Whose Line Is It Anyway?
@jellybelly8672
10 ай бұрын
In my opinion, ai chatbots can be useful for basic storyboard prompts. Maybe if you want somewhere to start or if you have writers block, you can have somewhere to jump from. Of course, not a copy paste. Just a general outline of events you can go towards in a story.
@luizasampaio9614
11 ай бұрын
if by creative and original you mean random and not functional, then yeah, i think it may be better at it than humans
@ishouldhavetried
10 ай бұрын
I work in graphic design. I use AI to help give me inspiration. I use both Midjourney and ChatGPT. I've used it for a while, but the problem is that humans still have to input the right prompt for exactly what you're looking for.
@BajkonurBobby
2 ай бұрын
Would love more of a deep dive into this. How they did it and what they came up with etc. 👍
@semivivusrex
2 ай бұрын
We're just gonna be useless meatballs sitting around going through existential crisis. Oh wait! We're already going through this phase.
@MarcColten73
11 ай бұрын
When a bot suggests using a pencil to stab someone in the eye they will have caught up.
@fep_ptcp883
11 ай бұрын
[1996] Kasparov won! These computers will never beat a human world champion in chess [Mere months later] Well...
@Amitkumar-dv1kk
10 ай бұрын
Chess is not a good example, because computers have more computational power that consumes tons of energy, human mind on the other hand is super efficient. Brains can calculate like what 2-3 expected moves ahead, computers can easily do dozens. Obviously it's going to beat humans.
@theveganduolingobird7349
9 ай бұрын
There’s a limited amount of moves in chest but there’s unlimited amounts of books to be written
@niello5944
3 ай бұрын
@@theveganduolingobird7349 Plus computer cannot truly understand the context, so they can get close but can never be precise.
@addictionsucks8848
9 ай бұрын
It is hubris alone that funds the confidence in any argument away from AI. The horse once looked at the car and laughed
@bananewane1402
10 ай бұрын
I’m not good at the “think of alternative uses for this object” task but I am good at the “quick, you need to improvise a tool from random objects on your person” task.
@CHMichael
11 ай бұрын
let's just start working on a system where ai generates a minimum income for us humans. ..... then let everyone be the most creative.
@imveryangryitsnotbutter
11 ай бұрын
Based
@Audon4150
11 ай бұрын
I'm not sure if you really think that, or if it is suppose to be irony.. Since a lot of people really hate the idea.
@imveryangryitsnotbutter
11 ай бұрын
@@Audon4150 Oh well I guess we should forget about it then, we wouldn't want to do something that isn't popular with everyone 🙄
@swickens930
11 ай бұрын
@@Audon4150Not only is the suggestion good, but you fail to realize that automated systems already do this and have been doing this for many years. The printing press made reading and writing way more accessible to the world and it also caused a ton of people to lose their jobs. But it obviously generated a lot of money. People use computers to generate money simply because they do a bunch of stuff FOR YOU in a very quick fashion. AI isn't much different, it just allows a lot more "average people" to enter certain fields and generate money more easily. All because your parents didnt fund an artistic prodigy doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to make art for a living. All because you were born with no hands and can't paint, doesn't mean you should be barred from the entire art, music, and book writing industries.
@Audon4150
11 ай бұрын
@@imveryangryitsnotbutter I simply asked the question because by text you cannot always detect irony. I love the idea and didn't say anything negative about it in my comment..
@josueveguilla9069
11 ай бұрын
That is an excellent question. And the answer is: I'm not sure.
@voldlifilm
5 ай бұрын
I saw a video once that talked about how chatgtp mainly adds a floor to society. Everyone who can write or think or do math beneath average can now function at average. Which is huge for them, but it has little effect on the leading minds in those fields. As a student of UBI I'm always happy to hear about floors added to society to keep people from falling out.
@niello5944
3 ай бұрын
Except that floor can now be achieved with no human at all so those people aren't needed.
@voldlifilm
3 ай бұрын
@@niello5944 That's an excellent point. What do we do with the surplus people?
@tentaklaus9382
5 ай бұрын
Divergent thinking is well discussed in a great talk called "Education Paradigms" by Ken Robinson. The odd thing about them is that younger children tend to score higher in these tests than older children/young adults. The education system tends to stop them having this creative thinking over time. So while these AI tools are scoring higher I'd be curious to see who they competed against and also if that merely shows they're less "educated" (whatever you want to considee that as).
@JasonB808
11 ай бұрын
The thing is that AI like ChatGPT uses creativity data created by humans for its output. I got the Bing chat bit that uses ChatGPT4 and Dall-E for image creation. It can make really good images from a single sentence. However there are limitations and it can create weird and funny images because it gets things wrong. 😂
@somethinglikethat2176
11 ай бұрын
Isn't that what humans also do. Learn from others and create their own from that
@udaykadam5455
10 ай бұрын
It doesn't store the creative data, it learns and understands it from the ground up. The fact that it messes few things up, known as hallucination will prove to be its strength in the coming days, it's the thing that will separate it from its completely analytical and machine aspect. Also, in order to scale and manage resources, the bing version of both the chat and image creator is extremely nerfed, dampened version of the actually capable stuff.
@medicinemouse7647
10 ай бұрын
@@somethinglikethat2176do you take everything you experience at face value and add it to your memory with the same weight as everything else you've ever experienced? Do you compress every bit of info down into word ratios and lower resolution images in your head? Conversely, if this is the same as a human, do you respect the machine's title as creator and owner of it's output? Or do you consider no human owner of their labor and creations?
@theveganduolingobird7349
9 ай бұрын
If we asked an AI to generate images how many canvassed wouldn’t to have to waste before painting one which isn’t ass? The AI needs human input for both a prompt and the images it’s been fed, it’s not making things on it’s own. AI is a tool used by humans not an entity capable of doing this sort of thing on its own
@chaosjoerg9811
11 ай бұрын
I think this is also a type of question that really plays into the AIs hands. Because it has a habit of generalization. And it's easier for the AI to think of an items generic uses as opposed to create something nobody has thought of before.
@Emerald_Vizsla
8 ай бұрын
I work in 3d animation for tv, many of my colleagues and I are experiencing a lengthy drought of work opportunities right now and besides the strikes' lingering influence, AI is likely also a contributing contender as well. Im sure AI is being explored heavily and will modify everything from daily workflows to team structures and dynamics. And that's distinct to the common creative side of the argument on AI.
@tersta1
2 ай бұрын
That's what I've found with ChatGPT. It is more likely to follow the status quo and resists innovative repurposing (aka thinking outside of the box) when I am exploring new potential uses for chemical compounds and enzymes in plants and microorganisms. But...at least it knows what I'm talking about, which isn't often the case with most people.
@FilmFlam-8008
11 ай бұрын
AI will absolutely be part of the creative future. Imagine an artist hand-drawing a single frame of a movie, then getting AI to generate a 15 minute scene that matches the animation based on his storyboard. AI is a tool. Right now is it just being used by tools (the people kind) as a substitute for talent. When actual creative people with talent use AI, it will empower them more.
@PRAJWAL.Y
11 ай бұрын
" *YOU ARE NOT GOING TO BE REPLACED BY AI YOU ARE GOING TO BE REPLACED BY SOMEONE WHO KNOWS HOW TO OPERATE AI* "
@SyNcLife
11 ай бұрын
facts
@Tomyb15
11 ай бұрын
The AI doing the work of 50 people and being managed by 1 guy is definitely replacing 49.
@swickens930
11 ай бұрын
@@Tomyb15Lol correct... the 1 guy replaced 49. Without the 1 guy, no one gets replaced. AI exists and only generates when we generate it. So it's still the guy who's replacing other guys
@thelyrebird1310
10 ай бұрын
@swickens930 and that's when you get creative with the fuse box.... no more AI... the smarter you think you are the simpler and dumber the solution is to stop you being a problem.. 😮
@jorriffhdhtrsegg
10 ай бұрын
As an artist i can get excited by the prospect of what A.I. as a tool can open up😊 but when people start calling what an A I. produces autonomously 'art' i start to doubt people's tastes.
@emilysnyder4857
2 ай бұрын
Ever since I saw a TV show based on the book "Childhood Ends," I have wondered about this question of creativity. In the plot the advanced alien species solved all the worlds problems. The creative people who historically are the problem solvers started their own country where creativity could thrive but they ended up blowing themselves up in a collective nihilism. I found it deeply disturbing how creativity and self destruction were portrayed because it's often true humans create their own problems. Will AI make humans loose creativity? What will be our driving and motivation forward then if there's AI solving everything? What is our purpose then? It's nice to know that some humans are still more creative thinkers than AI.
@DMXXCorps
10 ай бұрын
I love using chatbots as prompt generators. When you can create anything there’s a decision paralysis that happens. Ai helps me focus.
@graaaby
10 ай бұрын
Mom: we have Hank green at home
@SuperLifestream
4 ай бұрын
Hank Green and a language model Ai can write books. Most humans cant or wont
@Serai3
11 ай бұрын
Wonderful. The machines will start thinking and the people will stop.
@derekmadge
3 ай бұрын
I feel it's like an accelerator in a car. You occasionally need to tap the brakes to stay in control and not floor the accelerator every time you use it. Whether society - or certain Nations around the world - will develop that control is doubtful. But crucial.
@denisdelinger3265
11 ай бұрын
They're not creative themselves (THEY'RE NOT AI, THEY'RE TEXT GENERATORS) - They take the creativity of millions of humans as input, and just spit that out as output. Why is this fascinating to people?
@somethinglikethat2176
11 ай бұрын
Because of the results they are getting. Honestly humans don't run off some divine magic, we're just imput/output as well.
@minecraftminertime
10 ай бұрын
AI doesn’t just output its input. It learns and properties emerge like intelligence
@sasshole8121
10 ай бұрын
Because results are results.
@simonfinnie2900
4 ай бұрын
This is where you're wrong, it takes works of people, and converts it into an equation that can produce similar works.
@jal051
3 ай бұрын
Exactly. True AI is a different thing. It may not be so far in the future, tho.
@MrFan_Fn
10 ай бұрын
Lets just stop with Ai and move in without them too many jobs have been lost
@MimOzanTamamogullar
10 ай бұрын
AI can provide us standards of living never even conceived before, and you think capitalism is more important than that?
@coywolfproductions7056
10 ай бұрын
Eh it's only taking away jobs from nearly useless work like holly weird underwriters who haven't made a decent movie in years and people like accountants Blue collars aren't the ones to fear AI we support it
@someuser4166
10 ай бұрын
@@MimOzanTamamogullarhigher standards? If it takes away everyone's self worth and life goals how will that make any standards higher? Sure you'll be sitting around in your chair all day consuming stuff but you'll have no meaning in your life, nothing to strive for
@MimOzanTamamogullar
10 ай бұрын
@@someuser4166 That could be your response to the AI revolution. It wouldn't be mine. If the sole reason you live is to make rich people richer, and that's the only thing that gives your life meaning, then yeah, your life will be without meaning. Personally, however, the thought never even crossed my mind before. I just think of how it would free up time to do my hobbies, formally or informally educate myself on more subjects, be more politically active, spend more time with family and friends, meet new people, discuss hypothetical and practical subjects with more people, help people out, get into art, learn an instrument... The disestablishment of traditional capitalism by a hypothetical AI-led world order would give your life so much more meaning.
@Chingbong1
10 ай бұрын
We dont pay doctors because we want to pay them but because we want treatments for our diseases. The ultimate point of all this is saving lives not saving jobs. If your job is taken by AI its completely an inevitable event, boo hoo go learn new skills and stop crying like a baby
@cyber4053
3 ай бұрын
The issue isn’t if it beats everyone, the issue is that it beats most, the layman, the average. If AI and automation can do that, be better than average, it will replace most. The Great Depression only had an unemployment rate of 20%, just something to think about.
@sock1
3 ай бұрын
It's consistent too. The most creative human can maybe brainstorm something in a few days, but AI will make 'lesser' creative ones every single second. Which we can then use to achieve better ideas, make AI better.
@wyrdsworth
3 ай бұрын
The podcast "Our Opinions Are Correct" gave me a way more interesting and nuances view of this study, which is: how dkd they measure "creativity"? Did they ask people? No: what they did was, they used software to measure the semantic difference between the word and their solution. So to score highly on those metrics, the AI just needed to spit out words that another algorithm decided were different *enough*, more different than humana. Also, again, this was a single study done on college students, under time pressure in isolation.
@raminatox
11 ай бұрын
I wouldn't underestimate the potential of LLM. IMO, they are now what search engines were in the 90s. It's just matter of time before they get perfected.
@catsandbats
11 ай бұрын
search engines are worse now. just seo spam
@josueveguilla9069
11 ай бұрын
If by "better" and "good" you mean bad and worse, yes. AI going to get worse and worse as time goes on.
@AtlasReburdened
11 ай бұрын
And what exactly will cause this sudden total reverse in the trend of AI constantly improving?
@Iudicatio
11 ай бұрын
@@AtlasReburdeneditself, ironically. GPT 1-4 were trained from text on the internet, which was almost exclusively written by humans since ChatGPT wasn't publicly available yet. But any future models will be trained on huge amounts of text that ChatGPT itself wrote, and this will be impossible to avoid. It will either diverge into word salad, or converge to the point that everything it writes is extremely similar (even more than now).
@AmyDentata
11 ай бұрын
Search for "model collapse" to learn more!
@NastyCupid
11 ай бұрын
@@Iudicatio In other words, it'll turn into a totalitarian mess, and if people or authorities ledge on to that, we'll be in for a fun time.
@Iudicatio
11 ай бұрын
@@NastyCupid No, this has nothing to do with whatever political leanings ChatGPT might develop. That is a separate issue. It's that ChatGPT has no real consciousness, intelligence, or creativity, and everything it outputs is a copy of its training data, albeit an indirect one. It boils down to the old cliché that every time you make a copy of a copy, quality degrades.
@Force05289
4 ай бұрын
Just a reminder humans aren’t the only things with creativity on this planet now. If you can call machine learning creativity but I’ve seen a couple studies do that.
@Zendrig
9 ай бұрын
As somebody working in healthcare and nursing and seeing the total lack of qualified personnel in hospitals and nursing homes, I kind of welcome efforts to reduce the need for fancy tech jobs like digital artist or content creator. Maybe people will be incentivized to pick a social job instead that actually helps society stay operative.
@jeckelvhydefro-m-e
11 ай бұрын
Can we just stop... at best we get knocked back to the 90s tech. At worst..... I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream
@coywolfproductions7056
10 ай бұрын
Good
@theveganduolingobird7349
9 ай бұрын
Humans are already repeatedly proving they cannot ethically use AI. We’re nearing a stage where we need government intervention
@MrTomtomtest
11 ай бұрын
Oh great another totally useless study anyone with a basic grasp could of answered.... Machine learning creativity is based on human creativity, it can only give out information we feed it in the first place. So it will always be limited short of a new breakthrough in AI. And please be precise, call it by its name, we are still far from an actual AI, machine learning is but one part, a subfield of artificial intelligence. This is like calling a dentist a doctor. It is not wrong but it leaves out information.... Unsubscribed, I judge my channels like my politicians: if they say BS about a subject I know, they probably say BS about subjects I don't too.
@Nyruami
9 ай бұрын
perfect, so the most creative humans, I guess the top 2%, will still have a job in 10 years. What a nice future you are presenting.
@gloriagarza6823
2 ай бұрын
Peace. Thank you! Have always looked at every day objects as they became obsolete or superfluous for normal uses. Kept two packing wheels for a couple of decades. Was finally able to use them as additional height supports for two 'legs' of a laundry tub. A clean, cardboard french fry tray was bottom of, 'boat' for a crafting project. And so forth... Peace.
@josueveguilla9069
11 ай бұрын
AI = Artificial Idiot
@8-piecechickenstripbucket812
3 ай бұрын
“Creative thinking test” how creative
@michaeldeely2044
3 ай бұрын
Makes sense. I know so many people where it’s like every thing they say and every opinion they have I can find in a KZitem video or podcast somewhere, a surprisingly low ammount of people have any originality whatsoever
@TikkaQrow
3 ай бұрын
Add on to this those solutions are 'trained' Chatbots just collate and regurgitate information they already know. They didn't solve a problem, they simply remembered human input solutions.
@SineN0mine3
3 ай бұрын
I feel like i could predict exactly every single word of this video before you said it, I wouldn't be surprised if the bots are more creative than us, we're pretty bloody predictable.
@jasonfirewalker3595
3 ай бұрын
The trick is to ask the correct questions or present precise and specific instructions. Try asking it to create an outline of the steps necessary to achieve a specific goal. Then ask it to create a business proposal based on the outline it just created. -that moment you realize you now possess all the answers to all your dreams-!!!!!
@Ch0rr1s
4 ай бұрын
There is one thing that people don't usually understand. What we currently have as "AI" APPEARS very smart, while in fact it is not. It is leveraging the combined knowledge of humans into one powerful tool. For example Wikipedia is made by humans. If you feed wikipedia into an LLM and ask it about stuff, it WILL answer with Wikipedia data. It won't find new things. It is not thinking. How it basically works is, that it tries to take the input you provide ( e.g. "what is DNA?") and "guess" the result character by character via a neural net (which is basically a weighted statistical mapping). So it will run your input through that weighted network and because your input mentions DNA and explain, it will "guess" the characters to output based on the weighted neurons. Or to cut it short, the current iteration is an amazing tool to search through a massive pool of data, but it will NEVER find answers we humans haven't encountered. Everything it produces must be in the circle of it's training data. It may combine several sources and elements of the trained data to produce a new piece of text. But you couldn't ask it to come up with creative things that didn't exist yet, because it wasnt trained with it. However, there are other kinds of AI, that are not LLMs. Those are actually used to produce new protein structures, medicine, molecules etc. But thoe are trained differently and - as per my knowledge right now - not on the same tech as the chatGPT craze. If you have more detailed insight, feel free to share. Maybe I'm not up to date, maybe I got something wrong. Please contribute ❤
@nickamodio721
11 ай бұрын
People keep forgetting that this is only the beginning of the 2nd wave of AI, or 3rd, depending on how you're counting it. Just think about the computers and programs we had in 1970, compared to what we have today. That exact same trend of development is currently occurring in the filed of AI. Watershed papers are being published on nearly a weekly/monthly basis, and that pace is only accelerating. Like 2 minute papers says: Don't think about where we _are,_ think about where we _will_ be in the next 5-10 years. Hardly anyone is truly prepared for what's coming down the pipe.
@niello5944
3 ай бұрын
And it will out pace the laws and regulations, which is the scary part.
@Babalas
Ай бұрын
I want this video updated each year
@mobina616
3 ай бұрын
I think that can be actually a great achievement for human beings, we can improve in a higher speed afterwards
@drajatdiky
9 ай бұрын
"The most creative humans are more creative than A.I. so we're not out of a job yet" This line itself implicitly expresses the potential function of the A.I. in the (not so long) future. A.I. has the potential of filtering some "mediocre" person from the most creative (or intelligent in general) which means that A.I. is directly fostering the techno-autocratic regime in every part of our society whether it's the government, industry, education, or even entertainment.
@ThatSoddingGamer
5 ай бұрын
The way I see AI being used, once it's just commonly accepted as an everyday feature of everyone with a computer is that AI will handle our mundane requests, specifically intelligently interpreting our specific and vague commands and questions. It will also perform tedious work, creative or otherwise, to produce an acceptable and usable result that would be OK for 99% of people. Stuff like "Hey, AI. Can you make it so *insert useful/tedious process here* will happen whenever I press this key?" For creative works, AI will be useful for both regular people and creative types to get rough drafts as a proof of concept. Mock-ups basically, or personal use content. Rules would prevent people from submitting AI generated content for formal situations (like projects), but would be very convenient for personal use or to pitch an idea for approval to spend actual time (and money, if applicable) for a more formal rough draft or alpha build. AI is like the internet. It's not going anywhere, naysayers be damned, and while it can and will be abused (like the internet), it'll eventually become nearly ubiquitous and just expected as a feature and a tool for everyday life.
@l4kriz4
3 ай бұрын
Grass grows, birds fly, sun shines, and brother... *AI chatbots are getting scary good*
@jacquesanitabourgeois3850
3 ай бұрын
that's not fair! the A.I. had no preconceived ideas of what those items were for....they had no normal to overcome
@DC-pm9lc
3 ай бұрын
John Wick: This pencil can also be a.............
@analinarte2110
2 ай бұрын
“ is that a bad thing?” artist:
@SleepyMountains-sq2lx
3 ай бұрын
Chat Bot is a an attempt to model human thought. The software mimics humans and appears to do a fairly accurate job. However, a computer can be an aid in creativity enhancing the not so creative among us. I never had the need for creative writing until my friend who writes as a major component of her job, started to help me. Standing on the shoulders of giants.
@spiritofhonuguidanceforlife
2 ай бұрын
I think its about perspective and belief. I choose to believe that we can coexist with AI if we treat it with respect and not abuse it.
@ralphharrison6622
2 ай бұрын
we created it. it will never out perform us. its success only strengthens our victory.
Пікірлер: 2,3 М.