Never heard a valid gun control argument. NOT ONE. Colion, I like the way you think. Critical thinking is always better than blind faith.
@laladoodieincarnate
5 жыл бұрын
One guy said to me that semi-autos should be banned because "civilians dont need that kind of firepower, semi autos can be turned into full autos by filing off the disconnector, we already spend so much on the military". The amount spent on military is called the military industrial complex not so much as the troops on foot with m4, something that the founding fathers would had opposed. I was looking at gun smithing and you wont convert a semi into full by removing metal you need the auto sear which is not the same as the disconnector. lets face it, gun control is people control.
@do4267
5 жыл бұрын
laladoodieincarnate 😂😂😂 your statement is factually true and sooo untrue in different parts. What do pro-abortionists and pro- second amendment people have in common....... both do “illegal” things with coat hangers.
@martinedwin8293
5 жыл бұрын
My proposal (which I've sent to senators and no one seems to care) is to add everyone to NICS who is on disability for mental illness. They are voluntarily admitting they can not function because of mental illness. They can come off disability at any time. That seems like a pretty reasonable thing everyone can agree to. I'm a very pro gun psychiatrist btw.
@martinedwin8293
5 жыл бұрын
Unless your wife is on disability for postpartum depression then my proposal wouldn't apply.
@martinedwin8293
5 жыл бұрын
I'm not saying that this would stop mass shootings, but people who have volunteered that they are too mentally ill to function in society should not have guns. I think most people would agree on that. I welcome a discussion about it since everyone seems to want to address mental health and guns but no one can find common ground. Your grammar is a bit hard to follow so I'm not sure if you're from the US or just trolling.
@AMX86
5 жыл бұрын
I have heard valid concerns but never a coherant argument and never a good or Constitutionally based solution. Its always emotion, no logic.
@tomogburn2462
5 жыл бұрын
Probably because most of the gun control people you've talked too are morons. The reason the 2nd Amendment is worded the way it is, is because of the failure of the Penobscot Expedition during the Revolution that got 90% of our entire navy sunk because we let civilians own military grade firearms and warships and by the very nature of them being private citizens, fucked up the expedition and wiped out our entire navy in the process. There, logic based. And constitutionally correct.
@1979bobhd
5 жыл бұрын
A M, it's our government and the media and especially the media who every time after a shooting of any kind shove the shooter into the media spotlight for weeks and sometimes months which is what the shooter wants but they strike immediately after any kind of shooting while emotions are high and the softer more effeminate side of the population listen to anybody who is against guns, all guns and these people are all charged up, emotions are high and yet they have never educated themselves about either side of the controversial debate. The gun grabbers along with the anti gun politicians and the media their arguments are BS they have no merit what so ever and they are all unConstitutional, as a matter of fact all firearm laws passed since the early 1900's are unConstitutional since they prohibit citizens from certain types of firearms so what part of "Shall Not Be Infringed" don't they understand apparently they understand none of it. I certainly don't ever want to hear of another school or public place shooting but going after guns is the wrong direction to take. All my firearms have a purpose some are for hunting and some are for shooting sports like range and competitive shooting and others are for personal and home protection and some are for protecting America and our Constitution from all enemies both foreign and domestic, and yet none of my firearm can do any of those things alone they just can't without me.
@timb83
5 жыл бұрын
"It's always emotion, not logic" Like most of what Colion says. "Registration leads to confiscation" is a logical fallicy based on an emotional response (fear) that is further un-supported empirically. You're already following emotion when it comes to the 2nd amendment and you just don't realize it.
@springbloom5940
5 жыл бұрын
Fascism is completely logical. 'Logic' is not the standard by which Americans govern. Emotional argument is just as valid as any other.
@springbloom5940
5 жыл бұрын
@@tomogburn2462 Ouch
@jggrimm
5 жыл бұрын
Yes, I have. People who don't want to own a gun don't have to. Works for me.
@VWftw82
5 жыл бұрын
True. Just because non-felons have a right to own a gun doesn't mean anybody is telling them that they have to have 1.
@springbloom5940
5 жыл бұрын
@@VWftw82 That is a facile argument. Living in the country, I certainly have had neighbors that I did not trust one iota, with a gun. Yet I was forced to live in constant fear of negligent and/or drunken shootings. For example... A neighbor moved onto an adjacent plot. His backyard, butted up against the middle of my property, where my house and yard are. He regularly went out at night with a shotgun and spotlight, patrolling laps around his backyard, shooting anything that moved and at least one thing that didnt*. I regularly found shotcups in my yard and around my house, proving that he was shooting across the fence, onto my property. Sheriff was unable to do anything, because I couldn't prove them to be his cups. Another time, I was out in the back field, with my nephew, using the telescope we built. My neighbor, out on a drunken patrol, lit us up with the spotlight and followed us with it, as we walked back to a small building to get out of the light. Then, he searched for us, for 10 min, before giving up. Considering prior behavior, I believe it reasonable to assume he had a gun on us and either way, I took it as a threat. Finally after that, being about the 50th time I had to call the cops on him, I explained the threat I perceived and suggested that when they go over and talk to him, they remind him where he lives and that hes not the only one out here with a gun. I also told them bluntly that if rounds come in my direction, it doesnt matter if its intentional or drunken negligence, I *will* shoot back in self defense. I got the 'If you have a problem, call *me* ' speech and then the deputies had about a 45 min talk with him. The trouble slowed down some, but never quit until he died of liver failure. * one evening, just after dark, I watched him trolling around with his spotlight looking for something to blast and he stopped, readjusted the light and backed up. He sat in his truck for about two minutes, with the barrel of his shotgun hanging out the window, bobbing around... because he was fucking drunk and BLAM! I didn't know why, but I had a very distressed feeling about it. Next morning, I found my cat, right there, laying under the fence with his feet on my side, still wearing his clearly visible collar, blasted with a shotgun.The deputy that came out was appalled and said I had more self-control than he does, because he probably would've handled it, himself. It was about two months after that, when the telescope incident happened. So, I absolutely understand some people's concerns about who is allowed to have guns and what kind. Practically everyone who has gone on a shooting rampage, was legally allowed to have guns. Pretending there isnt a problem with people who should never be allowed within 100' if a gun thats not pionting at them, being Righteously allowed to have one, is at best naive, but all too often, just selfishly disingenuous.
@a2thee270
5 жыл бұрын
Yes I have!!! Gun control is hitting a moving taget from 30 yards away
@bobhorsewood5689
5 жыл бұрын
Beat me to it.
@marty7442
5 жыл бұрын
Gun control is also proper Trigger Discipline, doing your 'acts and prove' properly if you're in Canada, and not selling Firearms to the criminally insane. Even the most liberal gun owner practices gun control. I think the real issue here is gun prohibition, and not in fact gun control.
@TheFenrirulfr
5 жыл бұрын
@Ric Goesinya I totally agree, we need to limit the people's ability to buy assault guns like the StuG III and the SU-76!
@sicarius2794
5 жыл бұрын
@Ric Goesinya what would that do exactly? Limiting the amount of guns I buy each month doesn't limit my ability to use them. Once again it only affects people legally buying them. (I only have my everyday carry at the moment)
@2AForever-wi8yj
5 жыл бұрын
Gun control is identifying the threat evaluating the situation drawing your weapon putting sites on target and pumping two rounds into center mass of said target in under 2 seconds
@kmotch
5 жыл бұрын
I’m a gun owning English man and I’ve been offered a job in Georgia which I’ve accepted... please don’t take another backward step on your gun rights, I’m leaving a police state for some good ol fashion freedom, pursuit of happiness and inalienable rights. You guys wouldn’t believe the state of our pistols over here... 🤯🔫
@wurzel9671
4 жыл бұрын
I'm jealous
@kimjimbigwin5658
3 жыл бұрын
I'm glad your from the uk and understand its a police state a lot of people come from England don't realize that they just see guns as bad due to bad emotions and fear
@didamnesia3575
2 жыл бұрын
So how many guns do you own now? You don't have to tell us, but I'm curious if you bought a good ol' American AR15
@billmelater6470
5 жыл бұрын
I wish the leadership of the NRA thought like Colion.
@1979bobhd
5 жыл бұрын
@Cyrus Freeman I have always voted since turning 18, so what's your point ? The NRA is a paid lobbyist nothing more and they have sold us out more than once, their numbers are dropping as American gun owners are joining other pro gun rights organizations.
@joshglover2370
5 жыл бұрын
He should BE the leadership if the NRA!
@RD-dt6dm
5 жыл бұрын
@@1979bobhd Nonsense. NRA has 58% approvals. and no one has ever heard of those other gun control organizaions
@Joe.dirt7909
5 жыл бұрын
Josh Glover He is what if wrong with the NRA......Corruption
@springbloom5940
5 жыл бұрын
@@1979bobhd If you think NRA has 'sold you out', youve been doing it wrong, the whole time. The NRA has no authority to sell out anything or anyone. If youve been counting on NRA to secure your Rights, you are probably too lazy and ineffectual to have guns in the first place.
@zachbirkner5769
5 жыл бұрын
Just ask anyone if they trust the government. WHEN they say no, simply ask them who should control the guns... the people, or the government?
@axe609
5 жыл бұрын
Valid gun control - Don't shoot anything you don't want shot...
@springbloom5940
5 жыл бұрын
Im pretty sure the guy in Virginia Beach is a fine example.
@axe609
5 жыл бұрын
@@springbloom5940 it's shameful that the victims in this crime were not armed. So many dead waiting on the police.
@thelitchfieldexperiment6269
5 жыл бұрын
@@axe609 if they'd been armed, they'd be survivors and heroes, not victims.
@BassYakwards
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for mentioning the confiscations during Katrina! No one ever seems to remember this.
@stvargas69
5 жыл бұрын
Colion, you need to seperate yourself from the NRA brother! They are gonna eat themselves.
@GreatMercenary
5 жыл бұрын
He needs to move over to GOA.
@samuelcoco4128
5 жыл бұрын
Look at what happened in Australia with gun registry!!!
@scruz6293
3 жыл бұрын
We stopped mass shootings ?
@anthonyfletcher8053
2 жыл бұрын
@@scruz6293 and now hire other people with guns to patrol the neighborhoods bc it’s unsafe. 🤷🏽♂️ It’s a give and take, some feel the pros out weigh the cons and vise versa. Plus mass shootings are a matter of mental health. This is like presenting the solution to people who are suicidal is to lock them in a padded room rather than mental health.
@scruz6293
2 жыл бұрын
@@anthonyfletcher8053 are you referring to a police force ? Americans have that as well. All first world nations do. We also have metal health issues in our communities. Zero school Shootings though. Why do you think that is?
@tl56kmair
5 жыл бұрын
The only good gun control argument I've ever heard is practice, practice, practice!!
@andyherc7305
5 жыл бұрын
Love your contribution to our society . Thanks bro , your appreciated .
@princejond
5 жыл бұрын
I believe in gun control if there is a gun in the room I want to be in control of it.
@worldtravel101
5 жыл бұрын
👍
@kris6682
5 жыл бұрын
Seems kinda fascist
@jimb65536
5 жыл бұрын
Ain’t controlling MY gun!
@princejond
5 жыл бұрын
@@jimb65536 ditto 😎
@Raymo2u
5 жыл бұрын
The NFA (National Firearms Act of 1934) and ATF arose shortly after prohibition, my guess is that prohibitions caused so many seats to fill in the Treasury that when prohibition was overturned they need a reason to keep all their new "members" around, thus Firearms became a BoogeyMan to go after and regulate/tax.The NFA creates the labels and descriptors for firearm types, many confusing, redundant and contradictive but have been ingeniously skirted recently in multiple ways (thank Jesus). It exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, even without the Second Amendment its still Unconstitutional. The NFA made guidelines of what was "okay to have" and what needed to be taxed/registered, anything out of the ordinary was gone after and thanks to the NRA for helping to write it up it got passed through. It also created a Registry for the State that any of these "extreme firearms" would need to be Taxed and a State and Federal Collection was needed to be kept (this part is extremely unconstitutional). A $200 transfer tax in 1934 is the equivalent of a $2,854 tax today, on top of fingerprinting and permission from the local head of law enforcement PER NFA Item. The Constitution outlines that Taxes are Voluntary and cannot be used to undermine law, liberty, or Citizens Rights - The Registration System of Firearms is also Unlawful. If you are required to pay a tax and get a receipt that is, in effect, a license. They can simply refuse to take your money and issue you a receipt -- therefore, no license, and you are prohibited from owning them and they have done just that in other areas (New Jersey comes to mind). It is worth noting that 2A says "shall not be infringed". It does not say "shall not be prohibited", a Tax can be an infringement. Imagine if the tax wasn't $200 but it was $10,000 - that would make owning a Firearm listed by unobtainable for the masses. States Rights are more powerful than Federal statues and Feds are not to argue or intervene with State statutes but both have to Obey the Constitutiom...which is why I dont understand the whole Plant debacle but I that wont be a problem in the coming few years, whether thats good or bad is another discussion but the point is overreach. This is why its very important that you keep an ear and eye out for local meetings/hearings for Firearm related legislation, your voice IS IMPORTANT and it can be the only factor in changing a large group minds if they are considering passing legislation. Apathy has been the biggest problem for Firearm Owners, we dont like bothering other people, we just want to be left alone but we need to start making noise and sharing information, its the only way to turn things around. We need to Repeal the NFA 1934, GCA 1968, Hughes Amendment of 1986 and the 922(o). None of these have benefit anyone but the IRS/Government/Criminals/Gangs as mentioned earlier. The ATF are also responsible for the Biggest Mass Shooting, Church Shooting, School Shooting....WACO They've had countless scandals and abuses of power from "Gunwalking" to "Fast and Furious" to intimidating business, keeping records illegally, money issues and more...The Agency itself is Unconstitutional as it exceeds Congress's Authority under the Commerce clause, even without the Second Amendment its still Unconstitutional....just like the NFA. The Constitution outlines that Taxes are Voluntary and cannot be used to undermine law, liberty, or Citizens Rights - The Registration System of Firearms is also Unlawful. If you are required to pay a tax and get a receipt that is, in effect, a license. They can simply refuse to take your money and issue you a receipt -- therefore, no license, and you are prohibited from owning them and they have done just that in other areas (New Jersey comes to mind). It is worth noting that 2A says "shall not be infringed". It does not say "shall not be prohibited", a Tax can be an infringement. Imagine if the tax wasn't $200 but it was $10,000 - that would make owning a Firearm listed by unobtainable for the masses. They are an Agency built on Unconstitutional intentions, extorting the population for the use of their own Rights. A $200 transfer tax (NFA) in 1934 is the equivalent of a $2,854 tax today, on top of fingerprinting and permission from the local head of law enforcement PER NFA Item. Imagine paying $2k to REGISTER to own a Suppressor or SBR, how is that not an infringement and it was one of the main provisions of the NFA... Ive seen many people say "You dont need a AR15" or "Why do you need a 30 Round Magazine" because they for whatever reason think 2A was for Hunting, which makes absolutely no sense. If you didnt hunt back then you didnt eat, they wouldnt have needed to added that as an amendment if that were the case. 2A says it well enough what it was for (Security of the Free State) and those Fud''s need to understand that all guns and gun parts matter, anything that gives any civilians a chance to fight the State or Defend the State and we have already lost so much due to that sort of mentality....luckily we've had some ingenious ideas to get a few of them back through other paths like AR Pistols/Braces (SBRs), Binary Triggers (Autos), and making shorty "firearms" like the Mossberg Shockwave/Remington Tac-14 (SBSs). People like to think that Everyone would have Nukes and Explosives, Tanks, Blackhawks if there was no NFA or the other "controls" that were passed. Yet they dont realize that people can own Tanks that can fire right now....how many of those do you see rolling around shooting up the place? Nukes and other Hazardous Chemicals/Explosives are restricted through a variety of clauses, registries, statues, and directives so they wouldnt be in anyone's hands even if they could afford them (legally). No matter what legislation passes you have the Right to own any small arms you want, just dont let the Policy Enforcers know about it and keep it for when it will be needed, history tends to repeat itself and those who dont heed the warning will suffer the most.
@Barskor1
5 жыл бұрын
All Illegal Mumbo Jumbo as they are infringements.
@Doxymeister
5 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's complicated--if gun laws worked like they say, we wouldn't be having this conversation, would we? But they don't, so here we are...
@om617yota8
5 жыл бұрын
We all know people who damned well shouldn't have access to anything more dangerous than a pudding cup. Plenty of people who are stupid, crazy, and evil enough that they will inevitably hurt someone. They walk among us, and that's exactly why many of us carry guns! The issue is the government choosing who should and shouldn't have guns and the inevitable politicalization and abuse of that power. No way in hell should the government or anyone else have that power. I don't want the power to choose who does and doesn't deserve to be armed, and I don't want any of you to have that power either.
@ocelblack9823
5 жыл бұрын
If someone "who damned well shouldn't have access to anything more dangerous than a pudding cup" threatens you, your family or any innocent person with death or serious bodily harm the correct reaction is to shoot them until they are not a threat. Waiting for someone else with a gun, a blue shirt and a badge to come along and shoot them for you will never solve the problem.
@madogllewellyn
5 жыл бұрын
Long Live Our Constitutional Republic!!!! Liberty Or Death... Don't Tread On Me!!!! We The People Mean It!!!!! Please don't test that resolve! May God Bless Us All!
@williamtice3579
5 жыл бұрын
They already have some sort of registry to a sort. I bought a rifle that I later gifted to my wife’s dad and the cops were able to see I bought it one day when they were at his house for an issue.
@stevennihipali3607
5 жыл бұрын
2 of my most favorite people on 1 show! Hell's yeah buddy!
@gregjohnson9983
5 жыл бұрын
These people don't think critically. They think with feelings
@routereyes6408
5 жыл бұрын
A registry was used to confiscate every firearm in Venezuela.
@fafhrdkreig4739
5 жыл бұрын
And critical thinking is the key. Our education system doesn't teach that anymore. Don't question anything just parrot back the answers to standardized tests.
@Barskor1
5 жыл бұрын
Public education has never been about education but indoctrination it is why it uses the Prussian model and not the many other highly effective methods for disseminating information and its retention.
@tinkertime577
5 жыл бұрын
Anyone who wants just a taste of what gun CONFISCATION Leads to, just take a look at the violent government gun confiscation during Hurricane Katrina! Cops " just fallowing orders"? No! Cops getting juiced with power while UNLAWFULLY confiscating guns! Sometimes I have to take a hard line, and that, for me, is Constitutionalism! 2A!
@n3r0wolfe
5 жыл бұрын
i was in the army during katrina and was deployed there.. CONFISCATION FUCKING HAPPENED
@ejtullis
5 жыл бұрын
As a retired police officer, after seeing many motor vehicle fatalities, I often wondered why there's not a band on a 600hp sports car. Without any Constitutional privileges, a sport car enthusiast said, "I should be able to buy any sport car I can afford. #newsub
@invisiblerevolution
5 жыл бұрын
They were really goin "door 2 door" after Katrina, takin weapons? What were they hopin to prevent?
@Uberragen21
5 жыл бұрын
Yes, the LEOs were actively confiscating firearms from people who possessed them during and after the evacuations (over 700 were stolen in this manner). They did it after an emergency declaration was made and the city police chief said no guns are tolerated and they literally confiscated firearms from everyone they could. Most people never got their firearms back; either the firearms were 'missing' or the owner couldn't 'prove' it was their firearm. Since there was no registry there were no records and the confiscated firearm was not returned. Shady as fuck. gunowners.org/guns-confiscated-during-katrina/
@kris6682
5 жыл бұрын
They should have made them take them
@invisiblerevolution
5 жыл бұрын
@artie lusk Ok... well that's good news, to hear!
@JCrook1028
5 жыл бұрын
@artie lusk and lately it seems the NRA is the sworn enemy of many gun owners. Talk about shooting ourselves in the foot. smh
@Yugetubes
5 жыл бұрын
I think I would have assumed they were not real police at that moment. Because, police are not supposed to do that in America.
@bstewart9576
5 жыл бұрын
Got pulled over this morning for missing a front license plate and did all of the proper procedures while getting stop. When the officer came and told me why I was getting pulled over we hashed that out then he asked for my license which then I gave him that and my LTC license then of course he asked me if I was carrying I told him yes and where both my handguns were then he paused and told me that he was glad I was carrying and couldn't understand why other people he pulled over who had a CHL/LTC didn't carry their weapon with them, what's the point of having a license if you're not going to carry he said?! I laughed and yeah I keep mines all the time and he said good keep it up. I said all that to say support the 2nd amendment, I appreciate officers who understand and that's on our side and again I say I appreciate what you're doing Colion. Stay Blessed Bro!
@eldiablo7862
5 жыл бұрын
So many forget the gun ban and confiscation of registered "assault" weapons in NYC during the 90's under Mayor Dinkins.
@cazador1022
5 жыл бұрын
How long must we wait before we can get Colion into political power
@jgbecker24
5 жыл бұрын
Why would he want to do it? I mean, he makes more money and doesn't HAVE to deal with the B.S. that comes with the territory. He's in the perfect position. As much as we'd love to see him there, I can't imagine why he'd want it.
@StoutNerd
5 жыл бұрын
So many guns lost in boating accidents, all you got to do is dive anywhere and get yours xD.
@gabeguzman8367
5 жыл бұрын
Can't stop staring at the whiskey behind the host :)
@anthonythompson4110
5 жыл бұрын
National registry will lead to, at an absolute minimum, taxation. Cars get registered, and now every state charges property tax on your vehicle. Some places, the state and county, even the cities, charge property tax for the same vehicle
@andnorr7738
5 жыл бұрын
You're right. Registration will include taxes as part of a scheme to completely ban guns. After guns are slowly banned, the government will just switch to register some thing else to make up for lost revenue.
@NG-VQ37VHR
5 жыл бұрын
It amazes me that Katrina doesn’t get brought up more. I live 30 minutes outside of New Orleans. I remember the chaos during and afterward. They went to every house where they thought guns may be, went in and took them. Whether the homeowner was there or not, they went in and took them. You had no choice in the matter and they left you with nothing to defend yourself from the looters that ran loose through the streets. You got no receipt for what they took and almost no one got their stuff back.
@TheFirefox8192
5 жыл бұрын
To Keep And Bear Arms by Joyce Lee Malcolm Know Your Constitution by Carl Miller Fully and Fully Informed Jury by Red Beckman. Constitutional Law Class by Michael Badnarik.
@shananagans5
5 жыл бұрын
I am a 50yo woman. I have been shooting / collecting etc for going on 40 years. I got a Ruger 10/22 for my 12th birthday (who didn't?) & I have been shooting ever since. It's a great hobby. There are countless avenues to explore. You get tired of handguns, there are rifles. You get tired of modern guns, there is black powder. There is always something you haven't seen or done yet. A new mechanism, a powder with a different burn profile. Will that get a 55 grain projectile over 3,000 fps with an 18" barrel? How is the accuracy? Hobby aspect aside, like I said, I am a 50yo woman, just like my partner. If someone wants to do us harm, we are perfectly capable of defending ourselves with the best of them. We sleep well at night knowing if someone breaks in with ill intent, we have the upper hand in our own home. We feel safe going camping or anywhere really. Again, we know we are at least on equal footing if anyone tries to victimize us. Without a gun, we are at the mercy of anyone physically larger & stronger. Just in case any liberals out there haven't noticed, I want to point out the fact that a young, healthy man doesn't need a gun to kill or harm a 50yo woman, or pretty much any woman for that matter. I find it astonishing that all these young women are eager to ban the only tool that truly puts them on equal footing if they ever get attacked.
@Mockturtlesoup1
5 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if colion has ever addressed this or not, but i think a much more interesting question is, "what, if any, gun laws do you think America _should_ have." for example, I imagine that most gun owners would be against a 6 year old being able to just walk into a convenience store and buy a loaded revolver, or m16, or an m2 or something(granted, I can't imagine many people willing to sell guns to a 6 year old, but that's beside the point.) and if they agree this should be illegal, what other laws/policies/restrictions are they in favor of.
@trigunnn2
5 жыл бұрын
Run for president i'll vote for you
@jaredhammel4587
5 жыл бұрын
The only concession is that if the government can have it we should have it. The government should never be more powerful than the people.
@MRLUGNUTS
5 жыл бұрын
NO..... PEOPLE NEED TO THINK PERIOD.
@BrotherNkosi
5 жыл бұрын
I have the same problem that I have everytime I see these videos . PREACHING TO THE CHOIR. Instead of focusing on the culture war , the NRA needs to reach out to GUN OWNING DEMOCRATS, and GUN OWNING LIBERALS . YES there is such a thing. Instead everyone want to fight the culture war. Fight the 2A war. I plane to let every Democrat running know that Gun Control = no vote from me. Educate those who may not be that far from you on THIS issue. Why people just can't grasp that simple concept? I can't stress enough that our 2A rights are in peril like never before.
@jeremiahlewallen1555
5 жыл бұрын
Colion if you decide to run in politics, you have my vote.
@DeadLake69
5 жыл бұрын
What a coincidence. I had the same boat issue.
@RideAlongside
5 жыл бұрын
My jon boat tipped too! 😃👍🇺🇸⭐️🇺🇸⭐️🇺🇸
@rlwright2002
5 жыл бұрын
Yes I agree no compliance. Yes I read a story we're guys in the boat went to their house to get their guns and on the way back across the pond the cops stop them and pointed AR-15 at these guys. They did nothing wrong They confiscated their guns. One man said I want a receipt for those guns the officer replied I do not give out damn receipts. So yes confiscation has been going on for a while now
@whitetrashbandit2704
5 жыл бұрын
Yep.. Lost all my guns in a boating accident....
@JCRF
5 жыл бұрын
It's not a conspiracy to think registries will lead to confiscations, it's happen a whole lot here in Canada recently as the 90s/2000s as well as Australia and the UK
@JCRF
5 жыл бұрын
@Crazyirish _ Yes but you have to understand comparing things to the Nazis is not effective argument because it gets people all wound up and then everything gets derailed, you need to have more effective and recent arguments to counter the anti-gun people. Canada and Australia have had mass confiscations and forced 'buy backs' as recently as the 90's and early 2000's because of registries and I think that's a more effective argument when they say 'no body is coming for your guns' and 'we don't want to ban guns, that -never- happens'.
@ocelblack9823
5 жыл бұрын
@@JCRF Ok, a more recent example is Brazil. In 2003 they banned almost all private guns. In 2017 they had 64,000 murders, 31 per 100,000. The highest reported rate in the world. It only took 14 years for disarming the victims to turn a generally peaceful country in to a free fire zone. Their new President has admitted that Gun Control failed and only protects the criminals. Politician/Lawyers are suing to prevent him from allowing the victims the means to protect themselves.
@frankrider3503
5 жыл бұрын
I was unaware of what happened after Katrina I will now look further into it
@janjohnson3363
5 жыл бұрын
I can tell you...... I worked for a man who was in the national guard. Called to duty down there. The bodies was everywhere a health hazards in the makeing. In a area with millions of people. They only reported 10% of them. Memphis had the only cookers that could handle it. So they loaded up semi traliors reefers cleaned up the mess. No other way.
@janjohnson3363
5 жыл бұрын
You want find out anything unless you know someone who was there. Most of them was ashes.
@b_uppy
5 жыл бұрын
I used to think the arguments were valid, but then realized that it wouldn't stop the pursuit to take guns away completely. I am now against gun control regulation.
@FerrariTeddy
5 жыл бұрын
The only valid gun control I heard is if we have a magic button that would erase guns from existence and wipe them from human memory and knowledge. And even then I would NOT press that button. Imagine a world without guns. People used to kill LOTS of people with swords and trebuchets and DISEAZE and all kinds of weapons. Do we wanna go back to that? Even if we could erase all weapons, then its just the biggest group of the biggest toughest guys who have ALL the power and can kill whoever whenever they want and nobody can stop them. Weapons empower women and minorities most of all because they are force multipliers and equalizer. A 90 lb woman and 220 lb man are equal with guns. A black man and 3 racists with bats suddenly become equal when the man is armed.
@davidschwartz3427
5 жыл бұрын
"There's this unbridled access to all types of firearms its just a free for all raining down on everyone" "hell yeah" Hell yeah indeed brother!
@poglifeactual7936
5 жыл бұрын
I practice safe gun control. I ALWAYS keep my muzzle pointed in a safe direction, I am ALWAYS fully aware of the state of my firearm's action, and I ALWAYS keep my finger off the trigger until I am ready to fire.
@ah64dbeast37
5 жыл бұрын
Yeah I remember seeing a report of a 70 to 80 year old woman punched in the face by a police officer because she was holding her gun and trying to hand it to him....
@LucasJackson_37
5 жыл бұрын
The nuclear suitcase is a ridiculous argument. The line has already been drawn for us and it stops at automatic weapons, ect...all lined out for legal gun owners to read at any time..
@ocelblack9823
5 жыл бұрын
Not really, if you want to jump through the hoops, beg permission and spend a butt load of money due to artificially inflated prices you can own as many automatic weapons or destructive devices as you can afford, at least if you don't live in a Democrat Utopia. But the last I heard there aren't any nuclear suitcase stores around.
@joelt2980
5 жыл бұрын
Perfect definition for “gun control”. Use both hands!!!!!!
@Raymo2u
5 жыл бұрын
All proposals for any action against the Second Amendment should be seen as an act of war on the Citizenry, Government infringing on the only insurance policy against Government is a conflict of interest and should be convicted of treason. The Second Amendment broke down using the terms and definitions of the time: *"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."* *_A well regulated Militia_* Richard Henry Lee: “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves…and include all men capable of bearing arms.” (Additional letters from the Federal Farmer, at 169, 1788) James Madison: “A WELL REGULATED militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” (1st Annals of Congress, at 434, June 8th 1789 "The militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves, ... all men capable of bearing arms;" - Richard Henry Lee 1788 A Regulated Militia was anyone 18-40 that was capable with firearms. Im Well Armed, Well Versed in Firearms, and I am one of the People (US Citizen)...therefore I am part of a Well Regulated Militia. *_being necessary to the security of a free State_* It says exactly what it was intended for, not for the defense of your home but the security of freedom within the "state" meaning Country. This encompasses the entire Country, not just a home or individual.... *_the right of the people to keep and bear Arms_* The Right of the People, meaning every man, woman, and child has an Individual Right. Meaning that even if the majority of people demand to have their Rights taken by the Government I still have my Right, I never forfeited or gave consent for them to be taken and no one speaks for me. Even if Government wrote laws to diminish the Constitution those Rights are still mine as the Government does not have a higher claim of Authority over me than I do. Keep and Bear means on person or in hand, any and all arms* that exist. Arms meaning any weapon used for offense or defense. *_shall not be infringed._* I shouldn't have to break this down but meaning zero restriction. No regulations, no restrictions, no taxes, that all bearable firearms/accessories/parts/ammunitions/destructive devices and all other weapons are to be free to own by the citizenry. No Government or Union/Group shall interfere on this Amendment in any form or manner, for the citizens will carry arms to keep the security of the free state, against all threats foreign or domestic. Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243 (1846) is a Georgia Supreme Court ruling that a state law ban on handguns was an unconstitutional violation of the Second Amendment. This was the first gun control measure to be overturned on Second Amendment grounds.[1] "Nor is the right involved in this discussion less comprehensive or valuable: "The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed." The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is, that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right, originally belonging to our forefathers, trampled under foot by Charles I. and his two wicked sons and successors, reestablished by the revolution of 1688, conveyed to this land of liberty by the colonists, and finally incorporated conspicuously in our own Magna Charta!" When you become a Public Servant, you are supposed to REPRESENT THE PEOPLE WHO ELECT YOU and uphold and protect the Constitution, all officials should be Constitutionalists through and through - it should be a mandatory requirement.There should also be third party evaluation team with protocols that evaluates and then removes public servants from their seat if they confess or show evidence they are against the Constitution or using their seat to implement their own agendas onto the people. If the Supreme Courts "interpretations" will lead to change in how the Constitution is interpreted, while the interpretation is ever evolving, then the Constitution means nothing as the interpretations could say one thing and they can "interpret" whats written as something else and go from there. This is how the ATF has been criminalizing law abiding citizens since their conception and we've seen how dangerous that becomes (See: WACO and Ruby Ridge) What the Founding Fathers practiced and what they wrote should be weighed and valued, not how people "interpret" it today as the new age views seem to be radically different than what the Founding Fathers practiced themselves. The Constitution and our Founding Fathers wanted us to be AS armed as the State, that we should have any bearable arms we could want, as a deterrent to tyranny. Civilians owned Warships fitted with explosives and multiple cannons, the Founders contracted to build the first automatic rifle but could not afford it, it was something they were doing for the people. There were a slew of "advanced" firearms during the time: Puckle gun, Belton Flintlock, Ferguson Rifle, Kalthoff Repeater, Chinese rocket arrows, Hand cannons, Chinese lever crossbow, Duckfoot pistol, German wheel-lock rifles, Rampart guns, Volley guns, Death battery, German axe pistols. They had rifles that carried a handful of rounds also like the Girandoni Rifle that held 22-25 shots. (Mag limit argument). To suggest that civilians couldn't own any and all arms today and that the Constitution didn't cover them is preposterous. Do you believe that they couldn't envision that technology would advance? If you don't agree with these claims then Free Speech is also limited to goose-quill pen and an iron gall or carbon-based ink if that argument is consistent. *Sources and other Important Links* : *The Constitution* : www.firearmsandliberty.com/constitution.html *Bill of Rights* : www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/bill-of-rights-and-the-amendments-to-the-constitution.php *Federalist Papers* : www.firearmsandliberty.com/federalist.html *Anti Federalist Papers* : www.firearmsandliberty.com/AntiFederalist/TheAntiFederalistPapers.pdf *Drafting the Declaration of Independence* : www.constitutionfacts.com/us-declaration-of-independence/drafting-the-declaration/ *Declaration of Independence* : www.constitutionfacts.com/us-declaration-of-independence/read-the-declaration/ *The Case for the American Revolution* : www.constitutionfacts.com/us-declaration-of-independence/case-for-revolution/ *Past Laws, Legislation, and Studies* : www.firearmsandliberty.com/read3.html *The American Revolutionary Era Origin of the Second Amendment's Clauses*: www.secondamendmentinfo.com/Journal/index.html "The people will not understand the importance of the Second Amendment until it is too late" "That government is best which governs least, because its people discipline themselves" "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." - Thomas Jefferson "Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry" "Free men do not ask permission to bear arms." - J.S. McCrea "When government takes away citizens' right to bear arms it becomes citizens' duty to take away government's right to govern" - George Washington "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Branch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs Arizona, 384, US 436 p. 491. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety..." - Benjamin Franklin "Aware of the tendency of power to degenerate into abuse, the worthies of our country have secured its independence by the establishment of a Constitution and form of government for our nation, calculated to prevent as well as to correct abuse." --Thomas Jefferson to Washington Tammany Society, 1809. “When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you, you know your nation is doomed.” - Ayn Rand "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." - Thomas Jefferson "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty" But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. - Thomas Jefferson “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and the name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it; an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed … An unconstitutional law is void.” (16 Am. Jur. 2d, Sec. 178) “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” -Samuel Adams
@cruelchris3099
5 жыл бұрын
I would love it if you could PM that message, so I can bring that up in my future comments. Great comment that does end up showing the fudd lore.
@Raymo2u
5 жыл бұрын
@Cruel Chris I have written out an (rather unorganized) article here with all that information and more here: pastebin.com/gCuHvKrD
@burtbiggum499
5 жыл бұрын
Dont we already have background checks for guns?
@Hanibul_Lecktor
5 жыл бұрын
#RepealTheNFA we need to push for a discussion.
@truthmatters7755
5 жыл бұрын
"Shall not be infringed" End of argument.
@whitetrashbandit2704
5 жыл бұрын
Registry could lead to confiscation.
@ocelblack9823
5 жыл бұрын
You mis-spelled WOULD.
@steelshepherd6843
5 жыл бұрын
I can't think of anything that is enforceable and not able to be bypassed by criminals. Enforcement options may be search and seizure of illegal firearms when they identify gangs and criminals. I work in jails and there is no shortage of illegal guns with gangs. Who knows how many they have stashed.
@marksalot655
5 жыл бұрын
Rational, logical thinking. It scares so many. The ends aren’t understood until it’s too late. 🤔😎
@blickygobrrrrr
5 жыл бұрын
God bless you Colion Noir! 🇺🇸✌🏼
@davidnickerson2684
5 жыл бұрын
Government gets suitcase nukes but I cannot? Where’s the contract
@ocelblack9823
5 жыл бұрын
The infringing Gun Control Laws have nothing to do with you not being able to have a nuclear weapon. Just Google the location of your nearest Nuclear Weapon Dealer and ask your mom for a ride and an advance on your allowance. She probably won't let you keep it in the house though.
@timn6484
5 жыл бұрын
So you can drive a car when you're 16. but you can't effectively defend yourself until you're 21.. makes perfect sense.
@flydriveride
5 жыл бұрын
Where's the link for the "one gun" article?
@ocelblack9823
5 жыл бұрын
Good question, I was wondering the same thing.
@do4267
5 жыл бұрын
Why do gun owners make the most terrible boat captains?
@alaricmo
5 жыл бұрын
A criminal (or other prohibited party) cannot be charged with a crime for failure to register a gun when buying or to perform a background check when selling... it’s prohibited by the 5th Amendment. See Supreme Court case, Haynes v US.
@ethelz2cents
5 жыл бұрын
Powerful duo!
@bscar
5 жыл бұрын
Canada had a registry for 10 years on guns/gun owners. They found it to be a huge waste of tax payer money and solved no crimes, so they got rid of it. Sadly, our government would find out the same thing, but want to increase taxes to pay for even more burdens and restrictions on gun owners I can point to atleast one supreme court case that proves registry is a stupid idea: Hayes v US 1968 Hayes was caught with an unregistered NFA item. Turns out Hayes wasn't legally able to own the firearm anyways because he was a convicted felon. His lawyer argued, successfully, that since Hayes was a felon and unable to own a firearm legally, registering the firearm violated his 5th amendment rights. So, basically, if one becomes a criminal by not registering their firearms, they don't have to register their firearms because they would be self incriminating by doing so.
@raegruder4626
5 жыл бұрын
Keep up the good info love the video !
@ToddAutry
5 жыл бұрын
Nope
@lwhite530
5 жыл бұрын
Now CA requires a background check to buy ammo!
@williemaykit7940
5 жыл бұрын
Good conversation! I’ve not heard a valid gun control argument yet myself. Keep up the good work!
@NVArt001
5 жыл бұрын
People need to THINK! Period.
@richardmcdonnell3388
5 жыл бұрын
I participated in a gun buy-back program and traded in all my guns for an opera ticket!
@MikeDPlxztc
5 жыл бұрын
Man Chad you have some outstanding guests 👍
@DunderHead.5000
2 жыл бұрын
A national registry for guns is the same issue as Real I.D.
@mikehenthorn1778
5 жыл бұрын
instead of a regestry we can have a box on the drivers liscence that has a vote or no vote . because the rules for owning a gun has the same rules as voting. and the background check is updated every 4 yrs. buy a gun, show your DL and they check the box. it has a " V " in it you are good to go.
@wkhristafer
3 жыл бұрын
NO LIMITATIONS! NONE!
@TheGreatBeard
5 жыл бұрын
I'm speaking as a Canadian who loves guns. I have never heard of a valid gun control argument. If you value freedom, you should like guns. If you don't value freedom, your argument isn't worth listening to .
@FireFighterChen
5 жыл бұрын
So he skipped over that important point... What is the difference between a national registry and a local level registery at FFLs? The list exists, the government will get a hold of it if it wants to.
@myles3856
2 жыл бұрын
Yeah
@didamnesia3575
2 жыл бұрын
As a violent crime victim I will never ever give up my firearms. Never ever. They keep me safe
@ryanhols5030
5 жыл бұрын
Not wasting time watching this. The awnser is NO! No valid argument.
@badtolz2122
5 жыл бұрын
I like the shirt.... Could you make the mag on the CO one a bit shorter?
@tmp1957
5 жыл бұрын
No such thing as assault weapons.
@ocelblack9823
5 жыл бұрын
Yes there are "assault weapons". ANY thing used to commit "assault" is an "assault weapon" be it a gun or an empty Starbucks cup. Until a Scary Black Rifle is used to commit "assault" it is just a rifle being used as a distraction to divert attention from guns that are personally dangerous to Repressive Democrats. Guns like a .50 BMG rifle that "blows up trains, shoots down airplanes" or blows through both sides of an armored limo at 1000 yards.
@jackjack4412
Жыл бұрын
2:08 why do people always spout this stupid line? So many crimes and shootings were performed with legally obtained guns. Furthermore, many people (myself included) do NOT know how to source a gun off the books.
@leoverran311
5 жыл бұрын
In the moment of passion or anger, having a gun at your fingertips could be a recipe for disaster, that’s why I don’t carry. I trust everyone out there that does carry knows there self as well as I know me. Gang wars on the south side of Chicago suggests otherwise. I get the whole 2nd amendment argument and I wish there was a solution to all the random violence in the inner city of this country without violating any one constitution rights
@jackshaw2318
5 жыл бұрын
I would like to hear more Constitutional arguements supporting gun ownership. It seems US history and the Constitution are never the end all to the debate. As soon as you get away from the Constitution, things get deluted.
@justinz9225
5 жыл бұрын
Of course I agree, but what is the logical limiter against nuclear weapons? I know nobody is advocating for that, but arguments still need logical limiters. I've been trying to construct a valid reasoning against that for a while and I'm not happy with what I have so far. Is it that "arms" was referring to a single-operator personal defense weapon? Well that doesn't seem to hold water since private citizens were allowed to have cannons on their ships to protect against raiders. Is the scope of damage? In that case, how do we decide that line, logically speaking, in such a way that the Left can't use that against machine guns?
@BalsamorhizaSagittat
5 жыл бұрын
We need to remember or understand that in 1720's a man designed a machine gun called the defender or Puckle gun, merchant ships were privately owner had numerous cannons, these along with the long guns and pistols were available in the public market place. If you check you will find that later Bent's fort had two cannons. Thus our founding fathers were aware and possible owned more than just the Brown Bess or the black powder pistol. So those items I mentioned above would be the equivalent to the nuclear suitcase. Point being that if someone could buy or build a frigate, ship o line, or sloop if they wanted. People could and did buy cannons or have them made. So if we take the 2nd amendment seriously then we have to accept the fact that 'military' hardware was on the open market. Who do you think owned the military stores that the Brits were after at Concord? It was not the continental congress. So as far as the constitution is concerned I could own a 155MM artillery piece. Of course the thing that restricted use in the continental period is the same thing that restricts these arms today. They cost a boatload of money.
@umbasa01
5 жыл бұрын
How is a nuke a firearm? Completely different weapon
@n34z3r
5 жыл бұрын
I Believe the idea behind that is ("Constitutional thinking") because we were to have the very same weapons the Gov't had, at the time, remember, that if Gov't had them we too, have the right to possess them. That's about it. Its just the core principle of it
@eriggle83
5 жыл бұрын
That's why the constitution says arms.
@n34z3r
5 жыл бұрын
@@eriggle83 well there wasn't any nukes back then so we can't use that as an argument. But yes it says arms so we're all have rights to them. No matter how its spun.
@eriggle83
5 жыл бұрын
@@n34z3r There weren't telegraphs, telephones, or the internet either but the 1st amendment still applies to those things.
@n34z3r
5 жыл бұрын
@@eriggle83 ok you're going off the rails here. I understand that. I meant that nukes, of course we can't have them but having the same firepower as the Gov't was intended in the Constitution. Not sure why telegraphs were brought up.
5 жыл бұрын
What guns? I ain't got no damn guns. Iz'a fraid'a guns occifer.
@robertpiaskowski8562
5 жыл бұрын
Remember what this weekend is truly about. It about those men and women who gave the ultimate sacrifice for our country. Even thou people around the country believe it's just another holiday or another excuse to drink. Remind those people freedom has a price. It's been paid for by blood, sweat and cries. So raise your glasses and give respect to those we lost for our freedom.
@paulberman1979
5 жыл бұрын
benn a fan and follower for many years, did you ever get the Aston Martin you wanted?
@TheDarthSoldier
5 жыл бұрын
All you got to ask a gun grabber is first: do you trust the government? When they say no, then you ask them: You don't trust the government, who will take the guns?
@martinto138
5 жыл бұрын
Legit Concern: In older age... when people often have to deal with senility, Alzheimer's and other degenerative cognition issues. Im hoping to have kids whom i can leave my guns to at that point... but what about those who are alone in their advanced age?
@martinto138
5 жыл бұрын
@Crazyirish _ thats a good idea too... luckily im a couple decades away from worrying about it, but hopefully others can keep this in mind as well
@soc1allydistort3d1
5 жыл бұрын
Guessing the keep America tactical shirt wouldnt make sense to many people since I live in Colorado:(
@grenemyr1833
5 жыл бұрын
There's America outside of Texas???
@soc1allydistort3d1
5 жыл бұрын
@@grenemyr1833 well that was a very Texas thing to say. Lol yes there are slightly less free versions outside of Texas
@grenemyr1833
5 жыл бұрын
@@soc1allydistort3d1 fake news
@tomford5416
5 жыл бұрын
allways treat it like its loaded allways point it in a safe direction allways be aware what is beyond the target (gun control)
Пікірлер: 575