What ever happened with this? Would love to see more tests! And thanks for the stuff you do!
@kakemboluide
5 жыл бұрын
Hey, what happened to this project? Have been eagerly waiting for an update
@JurassicJenkins
Жыл бұрын
Ever notice how he starts something…. 😂
@JorgeJimenez2020
5 жыл бұрын
It's time for an update on the drone. What's new?
@bradman1961
4 жыл бұрын
Probably because it's the most exiting thing it has done.
@shinjithenegotiator2795
3 жыл бұрын
@@bradman1961 whut?
@KerryWongBlog
6 жыл бұрын
That's quite remarkable! Thanks for the sneak preview!
@Someguyorgirlfulness
4 жыл бұрын
I just love this guys technical knowledge. Utterly astounding! Did you guys watch the earlier videos when he upgraded the power unit by extracting the zero point energy from the quark gluon interchange gap using the Pauli exclusion principle to violate weak force parity symmetry and raise all the electron states to occupy every possible orbital configuration in superposition..... Holy Cow Batman!
@photojunkysdronezonevlog
6 жыл бұрын
So cool. Can't wait to see the full video and see more of your drone.
@kayboku7281
4 жыл бұрын
Perfect place for a test flight, not many things to hit! Apart from power lines, cars, trees hahahha. But looks like its handling very well! Well done!
@MantisRay861
6 жыл бұрын
Holy cow that thing is enormous! Careful around anything and everything!
@onemantwohands5224
6 жыл бұрын
Aaah that feeling of a fresh build!! :-) it looks the BUSINESS :-) :-)
@paddy2661
5 жыл бұрын
Super Awac mentioned my exact thoughts gas turbine . Miniature gas turbine vid on youtube and he tested it exhaust gas running into a small turbo then cool air normally for combustion engines input is used to cool jet and hot side of turbo. Then he connected AC generator onto turbo shaft . Cant recall efficacy but this Japanese man was switch on he designed and manufactures the mini turbine it's a pale gold color it's on KZitem haven't a clue how to share link . In comments he explains jet generator idea. Runs on filtered diesel think filtered to 20 microns. From memory it could make kilowatts of power and it would be the size of one of your 2stroke engines. Nearly finished my own overunity generator but alot smaller than this device. Awesome work love it keep it up can't wait to see it fly with generator on board it'll go. Cheers Pat.
@danielnagy5721
5 жыл бұрын
I love, as the boy was stepping back when firing it up, just like Marty McFly, when the Doc controlled the DeLorean. :) If this was the first flight, the safety distance still shows a really high level of confidence in science. :) I watch all your videos with open mouth, thanks for all the knowledge you give to me.
@TechIngredients
5 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@paulladdie1026
6 жыл бұрын
Looks awesome, I guess at the start you were doing the compass calibration dance?
@prestigeworld-wide8292
3 жыл бұрын
Duh
@brianjohnson2059
5 жыл бұрын
Man I want to hang out with you for a few years. I can't believe how knowledgeable you are.I would hope maybe it would rub off and I could get some of that on me.
@CozzyKnowsBest
6 жыл бұрын
That's awesome, but the DJI flight controller? Look into Ardupilot on the next build (pixhawk 2.1 et al), that's far more suited and expandable. With auto compass declination, you only have to do the dance once or when you make frame changes.
@reneestrada1148
5 жыл бұрын
incredible built.! congrats, by the anybody knows how much It's cost to build ans what's the maximum payload?
@eoinkenny3188
6 жыл бұрын
As this drone isn't intended for racing but purely heavy lift, I was wondering if you'd considered experimenting with ducting the rotors for extra lift & stability?
@supercobrapro7470
4 жыл бұрын
Great video 👍
@gillian2438
Жыл бұрын
Great video, it seems you have achieved a pretty nice drone, i would love to see a load, range and autonomy test video ^^
@flightautomatic4091
6 жыл бұрын
Funny magnetometer calibration with this huge frame! Do not use DJI flight controllers at big frames! Better to use Pixhawk at this solution becuse you can adjust the sensors from you notebook in FC parameters and not move copter. As well the best solution to not use the magnetometer on giant frames - better to use are two GPS sensors and implement mathematics for calculating the orientation vector in the flight controller program. Giant frames allow big distance between two GPS sensors from each other This gives the best accuracy in determining the direction vector.
@JaredReabow
6 жыл бұрын
Eagletree vector is even better!
@flightautomatic4091
6 жыл бұрын
selfmade flight controller with your code and mathematics allways is better :)
@JaredReabow
6 жыл бұрын
dima bochkarev hell no!
@photonthief
6 жыл бұрын
I've never seen anyone running a Vector on a serious commercial or industrial drone. With the exception of a few proprietary controllers like the Freefly Synapse, the Pixhawk 2.1 and DJI A2 seem to be pretty much the industry standard now. I'm just about to install a Pixhawk 2.1 in my Tarot T15 heavy lifter.
@SystemsPlanet
6 жыл бұрын
it's best to power it with a Zero Point Module so you never have to land stargate.wikia.com/wiki/Zero_Point_Module
@ErnestGWilsonII
6 жыл бұрын
Wow, I now have a new favorite channel! I am of course subscribed with notifications turned on and thumbs up!
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@andrewbeaton3302
5 жыл бұрын
WOW BRILLIANT!!!
@gddeen1
5 жыл бұрын
Fantastic stuff. I've always wondered why drones are not 2 drones with the top drone always level (helicopter blade setup) mounted to a lower multi rotor. The top copter would use a liquid fuel and engine to provide nearly enough force to lift the vehicle. The lower copter would provide the additional force to raise and direct the unit. Heck, if someone wanted to get fancy, the lift copter could be inside a gyroscope, the fly drone attached to the exterior. The lift copter could be 2 props vertically mounted. Procession elimination might require the traditional tail rotor. The system might even have the lift unit on the outside. It seems complicated but the hybrid seems too inefficient. How crazy is this idea. Obviously it must be or they would be all over.
@davidphillips2986
6 жыл бұрын
Have you contemplated a manned multi-rotor?
@PappaLitto
5 жыл бұрын
What do you think the lift capabilities are? 10kg?
@7curiogeo
5 жыл бұрын
Very cool to see it fly. Thank you for sharing the pay off for all your energy in this project. LOL I know your not done with it yet.
@TechIngredients
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you! And, you're correct, we aren't.
@locouk
6 жыл бұрын
It needs a detachable compass module or a wire so you can do the compass dance with out having to lift the drone.
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
Ya, that would be a good idea. Yet, as is, imagine when these drones get to several hundred pounds. That would make an interesting video under the category of...fails.
@molisemondonews6065
2 жыл бұрын
Hi, Did you try ducted propellers to increase the thrust???
@Sorenzo
6 жыл бұрын
I thought you made custom rotors? What happened to them?
@danielkeirsteadsr6939
5 жыл бұрын
how does it steer ?
@jaydenrareproto
2 жыл бұрын
How long can it fly? How much can it lift? What kind of motors are those?
@lorriecarrel9962
4 жыл бұрын
Very good indeed
@greggillespie4557
5 жыл бұрын
What are you using for a power distribution board? I’m building a 12S HV hexacopter and can’t find a good one.
@TechIngredients
5 жыл бұрын
I fabricated the buss from PVC bar stock and some SS cap head screws, epoxied into the plastic.
@did3d523
4 жыл бұрын
power lift?how many kg
@RyanLackey
6 жыл бұрын
Have you considered a rotary (Wankel) engine for the drone? Probably better efficiency at the small scale than a single shaft turbine, and I don't think you could realistically make a multi-shaft turbine in that size. Also, there's the LiquidPiston non-Wankel rotary, but I assume that is patent encumbered.
@eoinkenny3188
6 жыл бұрын
That was my first thought as well. It would reduce the vibration issues and still offer a high power-to-weight ratio. Fuel consumption might be as bad as the 2-stroke. www.aieuk.com/40s-5bhp-wankel-rotary-engine/
@PiDsPagePrototypes
5 жыл бұрын
Unless they use the turbine as a generator, rather then driving props. Wren make ones for RC Heli's that would more then do the job.
@onehumanwasted4228
4 жыл бұрын
Suddenly it became an Hexacopter :D Where did the other two arms go?
@USdemonicWA
4 жыл бұрын
what happen to this?? I would love to see more.
@matrixscutari
3 жыл бұрын
how much can lift this drone?
@rbmirza8655
5 жыл бұрын
Please give me link how to create
@mohammedbuti8707
6 жыл бұрын
hey nice job there what sort of flight time did you get in this setup??
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
approximately 30 minutes
@TabataFreeSongs
6 жыл бұрын
OMG. Specs? Flight time? It seems you could mount bigger props, but you obviously done some math at the beginning!
@iLLt0m
5 жыл бұрын
lbs of lift?
@slumbercat
3 жыл бұрын
Ah you guys have fun 😎
@hedleypepper1838
3 жыл бұрын
Ditto how's the drone coming along
@kashmirha
5 жыл бұрын
We need update! :D
@SA12String
2 жыл бұрын
What tickles me is that even with a huge drone, you still have to tip it on its nose and rotate it to calibrate the compass.
@RoboBeaver6
4 жыл бұрын
It seems really quiet compared to the ones I have seen, Large Props, lower Frequency I guess. Do you have any Metrics on the noise levels?
@TechIngredients
4 жыл бұрын
We haven't measured the sound levels, but they're similar to a small comercial multi rotor, but as you said, the frequency is much lower.
@jean-lucpicard8186
2 жыл бұрын
I know an Ardupilot compass calibraton procedure when I see one!
@BluntForceTrauma666
6 жыл бұрын
Wow, that bad boy is pretty menacing! Might as well go ahead and attach cutting blades to the props so it can just chop/cut right through any tree limbs that might get in the way...
@MrJamespcastle
4 жыл бұрын
Can you get higher efficiency by ducting the blades?
@TechIngredients
4 жыл бұрын
Yes, but the added weight is significant.
@TheEsseboy
6 жыл бұрын
What was the higher pitch whining noise from? The motor bearings?
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
This sound comes directly from the winding in the three phase motor as the current is shifted around the coils by the driver. This property is even used by the control system as a speaker to indicate settings when you program them.
@TheEsseboy
6 жыл бұрын
Tech Ingredients Aah, forgot about that, I have a electric scooter that also makes such a sound :). So it is probably hard to eliminate, got to go to DC or above 20 Khz?
@mattthesparky
6 жыл бұрын
Good day sir. I do enjoy your channel, your skill and attention to detail in your engineering projects is very impressive. You must be quite an accomplished engineer. I am an Instrumentation and Control technician from New Zealand, and I have recently acquired a derelict hill country sheep farm which I intend to re establish as a productive farm. Shocked at the cost of helicopter spraying I am now investigating the possibility of drone spraying of about 50 acres of hillside, and I am looking at building a drone based on Multistar motors and ESCs. I note that you have used Multistar on your heavy lift drone and I was wondering if you would consider sharing some of your results. I would be looking to lift about a 20KG payload and would need 7-10 minutes of flight time. Do you think a drone such as yours would be suitable for such an application?
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
Yes, I think it would. Engineering is an art where you balance the physics and the available materials with the tools you have and the cost in time and money associated with generating a solution. These motors were criticized by someone who commented on my earlier drone video. They are not the world's best motors, KDE and T-motor make better ones, but the costs are so high for those motors they may make a solution financially impractical.
@goranjohansson9753
2 жыл бұрын
What’s happening with this ? Grate project! Please continue. BR
@hastingb
6 жыл бұрын
Awesome!; I bet you don't need a leaf blower do you. ;-)
@bobflannagan7262
Жыл бұрын
I guess the final result must be classified. But maybe now try again with toroidal propellers for greater efficiency and less noise.
@rcconroy
6 жыл бұрын
These are really interesting experiments, but at the end of the day, isn't this really just an exercise in energy conversion? Why deal with the inefficiencies of energy conversion when you could just replace the drone motors with gas engines? I apologize if I missed a discussion on this topic. I just found this collection of videos and haven't had the chance to watch them all.
@Pownyan
6 жыл бұрын
The problem with gas motors is that they can't respond fast enough to be used reliably in a multirotor
@driversteve9345
6 жыл бұрын
How much weight can it carry? I'm wondering if it's possible to build a drone that could carry 100 pounds at a time? I'm pondering the idea of delivering water/fire retardants to a wildfire using hundreds or maybe thousands of these drones to help put out these wildfires we get every year. What are your thoughts?
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
This particular drone is limited by the relatively inexpensive motors on it's 6 arms. But, with higher capacity motors from say, T-motor, 2kw/ motor and an overall weight of approximately 160 pounds, your payload is within its structural limits. Regarding your application, I agree that the principle of multiple, autonomous "swarms" to deliver large payloads such as water to the highest IR signature regions in a forest fire, is a good idea. Modifying the craft to fuel powered or at least hybrid powered, fixed wing will substantially increase the payload efficiency. A tilt rotor, VOTL sytsem might be an advantage if retrieving water from anything but an artificial source or the most placid lake.
@driversteve9345
6 жыл бұрын
Tech Ingredients Thanks for your response! I was evacuated for a week by the Northern California wildfires last year that hit wine country. During this time, I kept thinking that their must be a better way to put out fires than to put firemen's lives at stake. We've progressed so much in other fields like technology, medical industry, and who knows what else... I started to ponder ideas that would put these fires out in a matter of minutes and hours instead of days and weeks. I wanted to find a way to make a man made rain storm and so I thought about using drones that could deliver water to the fires by using thousands of drones that would synchronously fly over these fires and reload and maybe even switch out batteries in an automated way. We got some of the world's best programmers right here in Silicon Valley and some of the wealthiest people and investors around! If we could make this happen, think of all the billions and billions of dollars worth of property damage we could save! Not to mention the potential lives as well!
@pobembe1958
5 жыл бұрын
@@driversteve9345 Well Steve, there are Helicopters! The K-Max is being remotely flow for delivery missions by the Marines in Afghanistan (I think). fireaviation.com/2018/04/07/after-a-13-year-hiatus-the-k-max-is-back-in-production/ I hasten to say that drones are more versatile and can be used in close proximity to people, but for truly heavy lift industrial /military/ uses. The reality is that both technologies are needed side by side each other.
@jeffstone7912
6 жыл бұрын
How much Can it lift?
@rich1051414
5 жыл бұрын
My guess is ~100 lbs.
@steveholt8991
10 ай бұрын
Still no developments of this ? Are you still working on drones or have you given up ?
@latergator3367
4 жыл бұрын
Heavy Lift !
@amalfi460
5 жыл бұрын
What is it’s maximum payload?
@TechIngredients
5 жыл бұрын
That depends on flight duration, but it can lift 20 kg.
@annierenard5954
5 жыл бұрын
bravo
@SurajGrewal
4 жыл бұрын
And kids, that's how skynet got born
@dnomyarnostaw
5 жыл бұрын
I notice you didn't use your "home-made" ptops.
@TechIngredients
5 жыл бұрын
They are too large.
@merlynwylld
5 жыл бұрын
Drone? Where did it go? Crashed? Remember those batteries don’t last forever and buying new ones just to make a update will be a pain.
@flow5718
4 жыл бұрын
"batteries don’t last forever" Yeah, in other breaking news the Sun still rises in the east and batteries still suck! Sorry, I have such a love-hate relationship with batteries just hearing about it gets me off.
@Someguyorgirlfulness
4 жыл бұрын
Didn't you watch the earlier videos when he upgraded the power unit by extracting the zero point energy from the quark gluon interchange gap using the Pauli exclusion principle to violate weak force parity symmetry....
@Dr.JustIsWrong
2 жыл бұрын
You made a drone.. Does this means you're a drone generator?
@fiziflash
4 жыл бұрын
why did you let go the drone project. Looks promising...
@TechIngredients
4 жыл бұрын
We didn't. Have you noticed the intro to some of our more recent videos on scotch whisky, the Tesla catamaran and the campfire generator?
@ssoffshore5111
3 жыл бұрын
@@TechIngredients Please do a status update!
@supercobrapro7470
4 жыл бұрын
Hi, What I'm intending to use is following, 6 Hobbywing X8 Motors According to website the specs of this motor are Hobbywing X8 Motor( integrated ESC) Specifications: Max. Thrust 15.3kg/Axis (48V, Sea Level ) Recommended LiPo Battery 12S LiPo Recommended Takeoff Weight 5-7kg/Axis(48V,Sea Level) Combo Weight Motor+Propeller 1040g Waterproof Rating IPX7 Operating Temperature -20℃~65℃ Motor Stator Size 81*20mm KV Rating 100KV Bearing NSK Ball Bearing (Waterproof) PWM Input Signal Level 3.3V/5V (Compatible ) Throttle Signal Frequency 50-500Hz Operating Pulse Width 1100-1940 μs (Fixed or cannot be Programmed ) Max. Input Voltage 52.2V Max. Input Current (Cont.) 80 A(w/ Good Heat Dissipation ) Max. Peak Current (10s) 100 A (w/ Good Heat Dissipation ) Propeller Diameter&pitch 3090 Weight 180g Flight Controller: Pixhawk 2.4.8 Weight 200g PDB EFT 480A( Available on AliExpress) DIY Hexa frame Weight 6kg Required payload capacity excluding the weight of Hybrid generator: 10kg Now the question is how much powerful hybrid generator should i use to get all this setup running? Obviously I'll have to make power generator on my own too. So what engine and alternator should i use to get this setup all going on smoothly. My required flight time is about 30 to 45 minutes. So please help me. Is this all setup good? Should i go for 40mm props? Would it work as I'm expecting? Do i need any changes? Any kind of suggestion or advice on this is absolutely welcomed
@paulanderson6609
5 жыл бұрын
Why not make the calibration component removable. calibrate and reinstall.
@TechIngredients
5 жыл бұрын
On small drones, these maneuvers are simple and quick. The interface cables including the power input and the antennas make extracting the nav modules for calibration a little cumbersome. The new A3 control system has 3 redundant nav modules.
@JaredReabow
6 жыл бұрын
Guys I would highly recommend you look at the Eagletree vector flight controller systems, they are so much more repliable and capable than the DJI products.
@MiniMotoAlliance
5 жыл бұрын
Did you get your FAA cert to operate this? They have some very strict rule about operating drones near power lines.
@chrish7927
5 жыл бұрын
Source regarding power lines?
@matthewvetter5070
3 жыл бұрын
Can you put together a drone gun, or something that will hack, takeover or interfere with drones from distanc. Love your channel.
@TechIngredients
3 жыл бұрын
We could. I'm just going to address this theoretically and it's not complicated. Forget about a broadband EMP. The concept sounds sexy, but the energy requirements are too high and the implementation is likely to overwhelm a broad range of unrelated electronic devices. A better approach is a fast, radio frequency scanner that identifies the communication band operating the drone and a slaved, directional, narrow band carrier transmitter that jams its control reception.
@Migueldeservantes
6 жыл бұрын
I do find extremely interesting your APU video, but in all of them I find exactly the same type of flaw, or weak point and it is the engine, I mean no one is actually willing to put the money to make a truly reliable power plant. that is vibration free or at least is some what more vibration friendly. I have thought about it for years now, but the amount of money that it will take to make a custom engine, that in my personal opinion should be a diesel, thus increasing the power density
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
Agreed...but think about this. The small volumes in these RC engines means that the stresses in the cylinder walls are rather low. Increase the cylinder height and the compression ratio toward 20 to 1 and add fuel injection (they already have electronic ignition). Such a 4 cylinder, sequential 2 stroke engine would meet most of your goals and is well within the capacity of an individual to produce.
@Migueldeservantes
6 жыл бұрын
I was thinking of a two cylinder flat tween but the reality is tat there is a need for a higher energy density " A custom made alternator" Very little weigh, tons of output.. you know custom.. all the way there.
@jamesburleson1916
6 жыл бұрын
If you want to get really crazy, make a flat 4 four stroke so you can have the continuous power stroke thing going on with the fuel efficiency and reliability of the four stroke, as well as the vibration cancellation tendencies of the flat 4 design. You could conceivably have a very compact and energy dense power unit that can operate for long periods with little maintenance. I would recommend sticking with a gasoline powered engine due to the stresses associated with the higher compression in diesels. Yes, diesels have better power delivery from a given quantity of fuel, but the engines tend to be heavier per unit of power production, unless you turbo them and tune them to make a lot of power at the cost of reliability.
@Migueldeservantes
6 жыл бұрын
Well I happen to agree with you 100% but also I don't see any good reason why a totally new design based on better structural engineered innovation wouldn't give you all the power in exchange for probably a 1/4 of the weight "Kind of sad that no one that actually have the vision also have the money to put on an new engine that would be able to integrate this particular features on a single power/plant!
@StevenWillmy
6 жыл бұрын
While diesel fuel has higher energy density, diesel engines have much lower power density. To make the same power, a diesel engine must be much heavier, larger, and more expensive. Also, diesel engines are noisier and vibrate more.
@thomasrobson6370
6 жыл бұрын
I like the concept, but I'm more of a "Y" guy (tricopter, Y4, Y6) than an octacopter.
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
It is a tempting approach. You will have somewhat less rotor disc efficiency/watt, but you will have somewhat lower overall weight with 1/2 the number of arms and attachments. Your design will cost less as well.
@thomasrobson6370
6 жыл бұрын
I've been surfing the net looking for props/motors that would "support" my thoughts/ideas. I found the prop www.foxtechfpv.com/t-motor-fa36-2x11-8-prop-2pcs-pair.html with the "thrust limitation" of 45kg; 45kg X 3 (I don't count the fourth prop under the third prop on the tail, it's really only for torque countering) = 135kg (297.62lbs) the airframe/props/motors/batteries/etc. can weigh 97lbs and I'd still have 200lbs for payload. The props cost $465.90 a pair (X 2 = $931.80 for the four needed), which makes your prop building very attractive. The two motors I'm looking at are www.foxtechfpv.com/tmotor-u13-kv100-freeshipping.html and hobbyking.com/en_us/turnigy-rotomax-150cc-size-brushless-outrunner-motor.html , the former says "max" 18.5kg (40.78lbs) and the latter says "watts" 9800 (13.14hp). The Tmotor costs $369.90 (X 4 = $1479.60) and the RotoMax 150cc costs $447.62 (X 4 = $1790.48). The ESCs I've found that could handle them are www.foxtechfpv.com/tmotor-flame-80a-esc-p-1857.html at $119.99 (X 4 = $479.96). I like the KK2.1.5 flight controller (mainly for the built in screen so no need for connecting it externally to a PC), but these ESCs have 8 control wires coming out of them so I'm at a lose. The battery www.maxamps.com/lipo-22000-12s-44-4v-battery-pack is the single most expensive item at $1,299.99. The above (not including the FC) will range anywhere from $3259.55 (with making my own props and the Tmotor) to $4502.23 (with buying the props and the RotoMax 150cc); both are currently cost prohibitive to me, so I'll have to stick with small scale to perfect my piloting skills facebook.com/thomas.robson.1238/media_set?set=a.1392405427537660.1073741866.100003046483109&type=3
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
T motor props are excellent if you go that way. The batteries are your Achilles Heal(s). The more you add the more you need. The gen unit we show becomes easier and more efficient as you scale it up. If you actually do progress to that large scale you'll want to investigate this.
@thomasrobson6370
6 жыл бұрын
this site offers one www.foxtechfpv.com/foxtech-nova-2000-generator.html but is the same cost as the combined above parts. APUs trades the weight of the battery for the weight of the motor, fuel and generator; I've been shying away from the aggravation of fuel powered equipment facebook.com/thomas.robson.1238/media_set?set=a.944956078949266.1073741854.100003046483109&type=3 as much as possible (electric chain saws also even though the plastic bodies piss me off), for me they're unreliable (for over 20 years I've been wanting to convert my vehicles to electric, but again not enough cash) and aggravates me when I have to fight them to get them to start. I think if I was going to go with having gas in my "drone", I'd cut out the middle man and have small gas engines driving the props/rotors instead of electric motors. The small gas motor that interests/intrigues me are the Freedom Motors' small rotaries freedom-motors.com/freedom_rotapower.html their "300cc" has as much HP as my 800cc motorcycle has. Some of these engines are being used on the development of a "flying car" freedom-motors.com/freedom_aircraft.html (one of which looks like a round octacopter).
@user-xh8po2pp2n
6 жыл бұрын
ازشما متشکرم میام اطلاعات میدهد
@TechIngredients
6 жыл бұрын
You're welcome.
@TheWeirdSide1
Ай бұрын
In the next shot unfortunately not filmed, the drone shot up suddenly, defeated earth's gravity and is headed straight to the red planet! Update therefore unlikely
@kaib5286
Жыл бұрын
with that motors you will not be able to lift much. I am actually surprised the drone could lift its own weight :)
@TechIngredients
Жыл бұрын
They're very efficient and carbon fiber is very light.
@omnianti0
4 жыл бұрын
you had be more safe making a frame protection around bladesbut maybe its too much heavy to lift or to craft
@TheDixlexxik
4 жыл бұрын
Needs a update !?
@ignasanchezl
2 жыл бұрын
Looks like the FAA confiscated the project lol
@TechIngredients
2 жыл бұрын
Nope. They're afraid of our robots.
@ignasanchezl
2 жыл бұрын
@@TechIngredients haha, I hope to see this thing someday. You always have a great project to show us regardless. Keep it up!
Пікірлер: 139