Thank you for sharing! I'll be looking for this film.
@malwida1022
12 күн бұрын
Great talk and great film! What a passion project!
@bbqnice1
Жыл бұрын
this is such a good philosophy channel
@garyedavis6486
6 ай бұрын
Stephen Hicks does a good job of evincing Davis's attitudes, which provides important context. In case the CEEE channel disappears, I hope that this interview remains available.
@cameronkrause4712
Жыл бұрын
" I have a masters degree in Philosophy, I'm not a philosopher." I didn't know being a philosopher was so exclusive.
@lindacianchetti3599
Жыл бұрын
I know! I laughed.
@erlinacobrado7947
6 ай бұрын
Reminds me of Leo Strauss who insisted he was not a philosopher but only a scholar.
@richardzellers
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for all your posts!
@4kassis
Жыл бұрын
I can think of another reason why Heidegger never spoke about National Socialism after the war: there was what I like to call national amnesia on the subject. Nobody talked about what happened right after the war - I grew up in the 50s, I remember.... there was too much pain, too many things nobody wanted to remember, so it took almost a whole generation until the subjects could be approached again.
@ansmut
Жыл бұрын
To claim that the reason he didn't rewrite his works after the war was because he was 'narcissistic' displays the difference between those who 'think' for money and a man whose standards of truth is beyond the reach of money.
@metapolitikgedanken612
Жыл бұрын
Yes, to me it adds to the credit of the person, when it doesn't role where the wind is blowing, whenever the political power relations do change. And well, Heidegger was right about many things. Including Jews in many ways.
@OscarCuzzani
7 ай бұрын
I agree. I think Heidegger had a historic view of his work and perceived that his work was way ahead of his time, like Nietzsche realized too.
@StephenHicksPhilosopher
Жыл бұрын
The documentary itself is here: kzitem.info/news/bejne/wIp7q36bsox_lII.
@vaughanosgan2623
Жыл бұрын
Superb post.....I have followed the similar tradition.......
@oldsachem
Жыл бұрын
Prof. Hicks, please analyze what elements of Heidegger appear in the ideological writings of the PRC communist intellectual and official Wang Huning.
@StephenHicksPhilosopher
Жыл бұрын
I haven't read those works. Where's the best place to start?
@oldsachem
Жыл бұрын
@@StephenHicksPhilosopher not enough to identify the work/s. One must find a trustworthy translator, I know one, but we need to transport her and her parents out of danger.
@bbqnice1
Жыл бұрын
omg dude u make a Heidegger documentary that's frank about his Nazism and the Heidegger family shows up to a packed house
@excitingworld364
5 ай бұрын
Please stop saying he is the greatest philosopher! His genius is a mirage, a case of people having convinced themselves in what has no foundation in reality!
@timreading5005
Жыл бұрын
An interesting definition of the word Goal.... Please keep on banging it on napoleons card you Star spangled gypsy 👌💚💣♒
@ricardocima
Жыл бұрын
Carlos V spoke german to his horse, not Frederick the Great.
@OscarCuzzani
7 ай бұрын
The statement is correct. Friedrich the Great spoke French and only German to peasants and horses. All his writings including his famous attack to Machiavelli, were in French.
@ricardocima
7 ай бұрын
@@OscarCuzzani As king, Frederick was renowned for being a fine military strategist; but he also continued to show artistic flair in his musical compositions and his writing. He conjectured on history, tackled philosophy and penned verse - and he did so all in French, not German. When Frederick received Johann Christoph Gottsched in 1757, he is reported to have admitted that he spoke German like a coachman (‘comme un cocher’); French was Frederick’s preferred language of scholarly and literary discourse. The infamous words supposedly uttered by the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V (1500-1558) are frequently (mis)attributed to Frederick: that he spoke Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to men and German to his horse. Nevertheless, the commonly held belief that Frederick was disparaging of the German language is absolutely correct.
@OscarCuzzani
7 ай бұрын
van Davies acknowledged that his film was one sided. Pity to watch a film that didn’t recognize the merits of a thinker. Many famous artists, scientists had a dark side in their lives, we all still accept that humans are not perfect. The idea of Heidegger being narcissistic may explain his reluctance to apologize. Another element that I have missed is that Nietzsche was not mentioned. Did Heidegger neglected him because Nietzsche was pro Semitic? As we out in scientific papers, more research is needed.
@UnDaoDu
Жыл бұрын
why is that? save us from what?
@robertmontgomery6256
Жыл бұрын
Basically he meant the modern world in general- technology especially.
@smrubelmedia
Жыл бұрын
Your video is very beautiful. I like it a lot. I have been trying to talk to you for a long time. I am waiting for your response. Please give me a chance to talk to you😍
@JSwift-jq3wn
2 күн бұрын
Like all Germans Heidegger was an intentionally obtuse peasant, and nothing else. He could never distinguish between philosophy and his own idiotic fiction. I am no fan of Judaism, in fact the very opposite. However, the most important thinker of the 20th century is Sigmund Freud. Nietzsche goes so far and asserts that "Socrates and Plato must have been Jews."
@nicolasplagne5577
11 ай бұрын
Ridiculous journalism
@pendejo6466
Жыл бұрын
I saw the documentary and was very impressed. What did Victor Farias say that was so controversial that needed to be omitted from the film?
@brendanmalone463
6 ай бұрын
Philosophy is the pursuit of irelavince some believe it answers the truth of being ,it's just a opinion
Пікірлер: 37