Congratulations for your selection in uttrakhand judicial services 🎉
@bilkishbano3778
9 ай бұрын
She deserves ❤❤
@anushkasingh8295
5 ай бұрын
How did you know?
@dharmeshd1052
3 ай бұрын
Oh that's she is not posting more videos relating to new laws and acts
@user-eb2pd2op5j
Жыл бұрын
This is the best online Law class on KZitem. There is no doubt in this regard. Please do not discontinue your contribution to the needy people. 🙏
@kartikrathi7901
2 жыл бұрын
Your videos are easy to understand and we can makes even notes from what you have written, Thank You so much Ma’am 🙌🏻🙌🏻
@Sunny009-d7g
4 ай бұрын
Thank you ma'am for giving such a wonderful lecture. You make even the most difficult topic easy.❤
@bipinbiharipadhy4542
Жыл бұрын
Respected Madam, I being a law student ,regularly watch your classes in KZitem and derive utmost satisfaction. My request in this regard is that I could not well understand regarding section 6 of succession Act-1956 .I would be thankful again if the same can be taught comprehensively. With Regards, Bipin Padhy.
@mohimam7367
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for making this important topic easier for law students. Thank maim plz making remaining sections also.
@RamSatrote
2 жыл бұрын
Your teaching skills are really very expellant
@AnamwithBaLLB
9 ай бұрын
Lot's of love from U.P❤ maam 🎉
@PCBHANDARI99
2 ай бұрын
Wonderful Law content, Mam I need your suggetion about bequest/will.
@chandanchowdhary01
Жыл бұрын
The best lecture i hv seen in section 6 of hindu succession act . Excellent
@KhushiDatwani
10 ай бұрын
ocassionally can you please move aside from thee board. it'll be easier to make notes. love your content . really helps as a law student
@rakeshdubey1587
9 ай бұрын
Subject to correction, the type of Debt is not defined. The provision only talks about the liability of the descendants (pious obligation) to discharge the debt.
@sathyanarayanan4479
Жыл бұрын
class beyond compare. thanks a lot
@gyaaneshwarjoshi3894
5 ай бұрын
It's given under Explanation of Section 6(5) and not in Section 6(3) by which a daughter cannot claim re-opening of partition done before 20 December 2004
@djain2k
Жыл бұрын
really very helpful, thanks for these....
@pratapraobhosale15
Жыл бұрын
Res.madam very good lecture. Please keep going on. Thanks
@samadarshikar9408
22 күн бұрын
If daughter born on 1920, her both parents died before 1956 act. Will she applicable in act 1925 or she can claim ancestral property based on 2005 amendment.
@samadarshikar9408
22 күн бұрын
Hi Mam, Need some suggestions on the 2005 amendment. I have one use case of a civil case. 1. Father died in 1943 2. Mother died in 1922. 3. Daughter born in 1920 and died in 1997. Will those daughter's son can claim ancestral property?
@KironPaira
3 ай бұрын
Very good
@simrandash4563
2 ай бұрын
well explained
@123abhinav321
Жыл бұрын
Hi 1. Land Laws 2. Labour Laws 3. Intellectual Property Law 4. Insurance Law Make videos
@gayatribhagwat1643
3 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot ma'am
@vikastambavekar8642
10 ай бұрын
Very Nice explained 👍
@nagarjunakanavalambedu4784
7 ай бұрын
Excellent
@pandurangakg8476
Жыл бұрын
Please explain how the concept of survivorship has been abrogated by 2005 amendment
@DKumar-f5v
8 ай бұрын
Thankyou Very Much Ma'am ❤
@Armaan_1934
Жыл бұрын
Excellent session. You're so cute❤
@musicalsuryansh5942
7 ай бұрын
Mam what are the custom adopted too by the Hindu succession act
@satyapalray2173
8 ай бұрын
position after amendment, for widow se related koi case law hai to please reply kijiye....
@bhattmehnaza3495
8 ай бұрын
Is it as important to study for social welfare supervisor?
@shikhaojha9348
Жыл бұрын
Hello ma'am it's request regarding...you covered tha blackboard while teaching please...next time
@legumBaccalaureus108
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much😊 🙏💫
@jollyagarwal8727
Жыл бұрын
Please make the video on remaining sections of succession act
@alwayshousewins8297
7 ай бұрын
some one please share me your thoughts on: Father has 2 wifes,1st wife S1,S2 & 2nd wife children S3,S4,D1. in 1981 father done a Registered Partition and divided the great grand fathers ancestral property between 1st wife S1,S2 & 2nd wife children S3,S4(D1name not mentioned in reg partition deed). Now untill 2024year 2nd wife children are living jointly. can D1 claim partition suit on ancestral property? as brothers still living together and enjoying ancestral proprty? does partiiton between 2 wifes children also breaks ancestral chain?
@shakibgour7443
Жыл бұрын
Good explain 👍
@pandeyrajesh7425
Жыл бұрын
Thanks🙏
@ashishkumarhari7787
2 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation mam 👍🏻
@pk9780
2 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot for this lecture . There is confusion between How to decide about ancestral and self acquired property ? Can you please explain that Ma'am ? Thank you .
@hindi_Kdrama
2 жыл бұрын
ancestral property It will be that which is inherited from grandfather or lineal ascendant and self acquired property is that which is acquired from itself, that is, what your father has bought from himself is his self acquired property.
@pk9780
2 жыл бұрын
@@hindi_Kdrama thank you...ancestral is that which remains undivided and is been there since the great grandfather
@bingiramakrishna
2 жыл бұрын
What about Oral partition before 20 Dec 2004 with respect to Public Document. An oral partition property Which is not registered or No court decree but acted upon that property before 20 Dec 2004 and have public document like mutation in revenue records.what is the validity of this kind of oral partition. Please clarify with latest citations. Thank you in Advance
@ReeraRana2002
4 ай бұрын
Before 20/12/04 if any oral partition took place and it can be supported by public documents like - seperate electricity bill, seperate income tax, seperate house tax etc. then it is a valid partition.
@ReeraRana2002
4 ай бұрын
Latest citation is - Vineeta Sharma Vs Rakesh Sharma,2020 SC the above stated point was discussed in this case.
@ananthreddy4455
Жыл бұрын
hi mam i have doubt uterrine blood relation kids have the propert right of which father
@utkarshmishra4637
Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much di
@Imamahasim456
Жыл бұрын
why u didn't upload full series...
@kanubhaiPatel-o8w
11 ай бұрын
Dear Madam, My son passed away last year and he had insurance policy of 25 lakh rupees, and nominee was his wife and she has taken away all the money saying she is nominee in policy. As a mother under Hindu succession act and as a legal heir do I get half of the share in insurance. Please advice. Thanks.
@ReeraRana2002
4 ай бұрын
No. But i would suggest you to consult an advocate.
@simranpreetkaur4410
Жыл бұрын
Section 6 (5) impose restriction and not section 6(3) explanation
@amitsinghdude
Жыл бұрын
Hi madam according to Hindu succession act 2005 daughter no right in father property after death before 2005 ,9 September or supreme court decision on 2020 that daughter property has its right even after death of father before 2005
@VarshaYadav-pu7cg
3 ай бұрын
Ma'am survivourship kya hota hai 😢
@annoymous-gq9bf
6 ай бұрын
Notional partition and deemed partition are same????
@Advocate92
5 ай бұрын
Yes
@pekka7154
Жыл бұрын
Mam use big blackboard its hard to write notes
@manjunathaks607
Жыл бұрын
My mother was died in 1968, her father (my grand father) is died in 1984.. His Two sons shared it in 2020 sub registrar office, registered. Can we Claim now in 2023 my great Grandfather agriculture property . It's necessary my mother should be alive before 9/9/2005 Please inform us madam..
@ReeraRana2002
4 ай бұрын
There's no law as such but if you file a suit and your suit goes in appeal in supreme court then there are chances that supreme court will give you the share. So I would suggest you to file a suit.
@sksagir6481
Жыл бұрын
If a Hindu kept second lady while his wife alive , and there are progeny from second lady who all shall come in legal successors..can second lady come in legal heirs?? What is the legal position of children from second lady ?? Please clarify...thank you
@ReeraRana2002
4 ай бұрын
If the second marriage was solemenized asper sec 7 hindu marriage act, then the second wife is entitled to maintenance under 125crpc and children born out of such marriage will get right in succession of father's share. Suppose there are 3 people - father,son1 and son 2 and there's son 3(who is from second marriage ) then if father dies then s1 will get 1/3..s2 will get 1/3...and 1/3 will go to Father but since he's dead so his 1/3 will further be divided into 31,s2,s3
@ReeraRana2002
4 ай бұрын
So final shares will be S1= 1/3+ 1/9 S2= 1/3+1/9 s3= 1/9
@VarshaYadav-pu7cg
3 ай бұрын
Ma'am date is not correct
@vikramkarade7236
8 ай бұрын
Start 7section
@Advocate92
Жыл бұрын
Hard to understand.... Please hindi mai example deke samzayee....
Пікірлер: 69