►अपनी क़ानूनी समस्या को 1 कॉल पर अभी सॉल्व करे (Legal Opinion)
Whats App- wa.me/message/CNF4QLGUA6CNE1
Consult with Legal Shots Experts ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/legal...
Consult with Legal Expert Adv. Naman Mohnot ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/advoc...
______________________
►हमारे बनाये गए Legal Courses से जागरूक बने, Click here
link.labourlawadvisor.in/lega...
_________________________
►Description
Judgment link- RAJARAM S/O SRIRAMULU NAIDU (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. vs. MARUTHACHALAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS, JANUARY 18, 2023 main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/...
00:00- Introduction
01:09- Facts of the case
03:36 - Judgment By Supreme Court
04:28- The Law in the case
Recently, a two-Judge Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court comprising Justice B.R. Gavassi and Justice M.M. Sundresh passed a Judgment dated 18.01.2023 in Rajaram s/o Sriramulu Naidu (since deceased) through l.rs vs. Mr. Maruthachalam (since deceased) through l.rs., and reiterated that the adjudication in civil matters is based on the preponderance of probabilities, whereas, adjudication in criminal cases is based on the principle that the accused is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
Based on the arguments and analysis presented by both the Appellant and Respondent, the Supreme Court allowed the present appeal and gave observations:-
(1) That the Apex Court relied on its earlier judgment, Baslingappa vs. Mudibasappa (2019) 5 SCC 418,
(2) That “The standard of proof for rebutting the presumption is that of preponderance of probabilities.
(3) That it is reiterated that the adjudication in civil matters is based on the preponderance of probabilities, whereas, adjudication in criminal cases is based on the principle that the accused is presumed to be innocent until the prosecution proves the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
(4) In terms of the standard of proof in Civil Cases, the High Court rightly came to the conclusion, on the basis of the evidence, relying on the preponderance of probabilities
(5) However, in terms of standard of proof in the Criminal Cases, the Respondent could not prove the Cheque Dishonour Cases against the Appellant beyond a reasonable doubt.
_________________________
► Related Videos
Landmark Judgement of Supreme Court on Cheque Bounce case in Hindi I Section 138 NI I 2022 tinyurl.com/33zb9934
Landmark judgment of Supreme Court on Limitation in Cheque Bounce I Section 138 of NI Act in Hindi tinyurl.com/3dh5x7rv
Cheque Bounce case NI Act Sec 138 | Explained in Hindi tinyurl.com/5c3ef6v4
2 मिनट में जीते Cheque Bounce Case I You must know this NI Act tinyurl.com/y4bj6bzu
7 Precautions before taking Cheque. Cheque Bounce case in Hindi tinyurl.com/2p99wsdm
_________________________
►Contact us
What's App ► +91 9251660907
Reach out ► www.aapkaconsultant.com/legal...
_________________________
►Follow Us
Website ► thelegalshots.com/
Facebook ► / thelegalshots
Instagram ► / legal_shots
Linkedin ► / legalshots
_________________________
#legalshots #chequebounce #supremecourt #landmarkjudgment
Негізгі бет Historical Judgement of Supreme Court on How to get Acquittal in Cheque bounce case in Hindi I
Пікірлер: 779