Both the British and the Argentinians fought without hate and with extreme professionalism and competency. It was a war like we had never seen. We're told war cannot be fought without hatred but the Falklands is an example of that being untrue with respect on both sides.
@cesardaconceicao567
Жыл бұрын
Being Argentine, I always said. We are facing the best enemy in that War, the English, the "English gentlemen". Until seeing the Russian savages today, without codes or any honor to realize it. I am deeply sorry that we have grown apart and the deaths on both sides. My respects from Argentina 🇦🇷
@yeffersonjaimes5280
3 жыл бұрын
Brand new aircraft entered in service the year before armed with the last air-to-air missiles defeating aircraft from 10 or 20 years ago with NO AIR-TO-AIR ARMAMENT in the attack missions: that's technology. Aircraft with lack of any modern guidance system or radar sinking last generation frigates and destroyers with WW2 bombs: that's BALLS
@35legrand
13 жыл бұрын
Argentine pilots showed great determination, courage, honor, and love for the motherland. They gave their lives in the Malvinas/Falklands war, and should be respected for that, as for all the soldiers that fought in the war.
@paulcardin6344
3 жыл бұрын
Members of the Junta could have shown their love for the motherland by not doing Nixon and Kissinger's bidding under Operation Condor and conducting a "dirty war" against their own people; kidnapping, torturing and murdering them over many years. Who would risk their lives to serve and defend THAT...?
@TitusFFM
3 жыл бұрын
@@paulcardin6344 you obviously never lived in a country where communities or military junta or faschist have ruled.
@35legrand
13 жыл бұрын
Alberto Philippi, one true argentine hero.
@greasyflight6609
3 жыл бұрын
Those Argentinian Pilots were brave
@paulcardin6344
Жыл бұрын
When you volunteer to serve fascism masquerading as 'patriotism' it's always misplaced bravery.
@sinergiamdp
Жыл бұрын
@@paulcardin6344 You are nothing but an ignorant an an idi0t
@paulcardin6344
Жыл бұрын
@@sinergiamdp 😊
@erictull2089
5 ай бұрын
Shame their bomb armourers couldn't arm their bombs correctly. The pilots dropped them too low for the detonators to arm.
@edgarrasetentayocho9531
4 жыл бұрын
En las guerras siempre mueren hombres buenos, por malas decisiones políticas. Mis respetos para los caídos en ambos lados 🇦🇷🇬🇧
@mick32156
5 жыл бұрын
I have no malice towards the Argentine military. I served throughout.
@simonyip5978
6 жыл бұрын
Very intense fighting, both sides were brave to do what they had to. The Royal Navy lost 2 of its modern Type 42 destroyers and 2 of the modern Type 21 frigates, plus the RFA lost 2 of the LSL (landing ship logistics) and the large Atlantic Conveyor was also sunk, but at least another 7 British warships were hit and damaged by the Argentinian Naval Aviation and the Argentinian Airforce planes. Many of the damaged ships were actually hit by unexploded bombs that had failed to fuse properly because they were fused for the wrong altitude, so fortunately for the RN they failed to detonate, but the Royal Navy would have struggled to deal with the losses if those bombs had worked properly.
@TitusFFM
3 жыл бұрын
Don't forget that the BBC reported this fuse fact so till the end of the war the bombs went off properly. Even worse they reported the attack on goose green HOURS before the british army attacked.
@kowalski666able
10 жыл бұрын
Argentina was not a NATO country fighting wars whith the US all around the world... the size of the british military forces where obviously bigger but the few Argentine regular forces in combat (especially the marines, the air force and the naval aviation) made the brits pay their toll...however both sides shown to be brave and like all wars, it was a sad story for both countrys...
@jimmyhillschin9987
3 жыл бұрын
the Argentines surrendered 13,000 soldiers on the Falklands and other islands - many more than the British had. Their naval forces stayed at home after the sinking of the Belgrano, meaning that the soldiers on the islands were alone.
@ezefinkielman4672
3 жыл бұрын
The majority of soldiers were young conscripts who barely knew how to fight. If the soldiers were professional soldiers, things would have been different.
@elliskaranikolaou2550
3 жыл бұрын
@@jimmyhillschin9987 So whats your point ? The British surrendered to the Japanese en mass at Singapore during WW2 when they outnumbered them 3 to 1. It happens to all countries.
@emafrancisco1808
3 жыл бұрын
@@ezefinkielman4672 In fact, british soldiers thought they were fighting proffessional soldiers, those conscripts fought very well even if they were not as trained as the brits
@volpiguitar
2 жыл бұрын
Most infantry soldiers were 18 years old mate...
@iftikharfaridy2974
Жыл бұрын
Blessed be the Mothers . . Who gave birth to such courage and bravery . . Respect for the Argentinian Pilots . . ❤ From 🇵🇰
@Cilt_doktorunuz
5 жыл бұрын
Respect to Argentinian friends from Turkey.Viva Argentina!
@cesarst3720
3 жыл бұрын
Descansen en Paz todos los soldados de ambos bandos Ojalá no hubiera habido una guerra en su momento porque todo era parte de la culpa de los malos gobiernos
@MichaelCasanovaMusic
13 жыл бұрын
Gotta give those Argie pilots credit. Flying in that low/fast over the water takes alot of skill/courage
@erictull2089
6 жыл бұрын
Their bombs hadn't enough time to arm . They weren't that good.
@simonyip5978
6 жыл бұрын
the Royal Navy and the RFA and MN lost a lot of ships sunk and many more badly damaged. The jets used to attack the RN ships were not state of the art (A-4 Skyhawk and Super Etendard and Mirage III etc). I don't know what the RN and RAF veterans think of the Argentinian pilots but I wouldn't be surprised if most of them have a lot of respect for them.
@cxarhomell5867
5 жыл бұрын
eric tull they had Exocet missiles tf you mean they weren’t good
@rmstorms
4 жыл бұрын
@@erictull2089 The Argentine Navy Skyhawks like the one that destroyed Ardent carried US mk 82 high drag bombs specifically designed to attack ships. The air force Skyhawks carried the problematic bombs.
@veronicaphilippi1994
4 жыл бұрын
@@erictull2089 incorrect!! that was the Air Force :) who were obviously not trained to fight in naval combat and did not listen to the Navy telling them to change the tiiming on the bombs. my father is Alberto Phillippi, he told me so.
@weekdaywings
11 жыл бұрын
Argentina might not be a G8 member country, but it has a fairly decent standard of living and developed infrastructure comparable to that of Greece, Spain or Portugal. Furthermore, that "craphole" like you put it, sank 7 of her majesty's ships, including 4 destroyers... not too shabby. Can you imagine what would have happened if you were facing a "first rate" enemy? You would have been pulverized.
@pinz2022
13 жыл бұрын
@Calenfeyn41 This was an a transitional moment in naval engineering. Anti-aircraft gunnery and anti-missile defenses had yet to catch up to the new fast-moving era. The brits had an awkward combination of WWII-era guns and high-tech missiles. In the Falklands the guns were useless against anti-ship missiles and were too slow to track high-speed jets whereas the missiles were good enough against aircraft but useless against missiles.
@PhweeRage
2 жыл бұрын
Hi, do you own the copyright to this video? I am hoping to use the interview with Entiknap for my Falklands anniversary video next year. Thank you.
@juaniravaioli3741
4 жыл бұрын
Great pilots.
@traceurhero
14 жыл бұрын
My dad was on that ship at 0:20
@pauldg837
7 жыл бұрын
People forget the most fundamental thing. Because Argentina lost the war, they regained democracy in their Country. The Argentinian people got rid of the much hated and feared military junta. This is the same junta that was responsible for the indiscriminate killings and disappearance of so many of their own citizens. So yes, they lost the war, but thankfully due to this, they regained their freedom and returned to a democracy. A sobering thought is that had they actually won the war, the people of Argentina would still possibly be ruled by a military junta today.
@zdzichus.3264
6 жыл бұрын
I wonder what role played all those German Nazi's living there since WW2... yeah, the best citizens in the world... right...
@siveren2183
5 жыл бұрын
Creo que se olvidan que estabamos en la guerra fria. Es mentira que fueron 30000 y aparte nose que tanta cosa le hechan la culpa a la dictadura si estados unidos invirtio mucha plata en ellas para que no hubiera otra cuba. Cabe destacar que esta guerra no fueron por temas políticos fueron si no mas bien economicos Inglaterra con la pesima crisis que pasaban no podian sostener los costos de tener una flota necesitaban una guerra rápida para demostrar que funcionaba este objetivo no funcionó porque perdieron mas. Recorda ingles que esa flota supuestamente debia defender a Europa de una posible invasion de la Union Sovietica a la Europa libre. Fue un gran fracaso. Mas alla de que argentina perdiera la guerra.
@tonypasma1707
5 жыл бұрын
oooh
@madmax5144
2 жыл бұрын
Yes sure. Thanks for the degenerated democracy. You forgot the great democratic Grl. Pinochet; along with Thatcher. A little dose of hipocrisy.
@kowalski666able
11 жыл бұрын
that is not going to happen...this war was a Galtieri´s madness... the argentine people is pacefull, this is the only war they had in the XX century. they just dont like war. theyare not like the UK or USA... argentina as a democratic country is against any war...
@Johanrdom
12 жыл бұрын
Toda guerra es la muerte de inocentes, incluido el militar.Esto es muy triste. Every war dead innocents, including the military.This is very sad.
@BritanniaPacific
3 жыл бұрын
Captain west had since become first sea lord of the Royal Navy.
@TitusFFM
3 жыл бұрын
War is a meat grinder. People go on the one side in it and dead, wounded or mentally fucked up on the other side out. Watching the entire documentary i started to cry. Those soldiers were killed because some fuck up had some great idea. Both sides showed gallantry bravery and will. One side won the other lost. Most respect for all of them the dead and those who survived.
@ricardoeliecerneftalireyes8308
Жыл бұрын
El Coraje de uno de nuestros halcones el Capitan de Navio Alberto Philippi de la Armada Argentina con su A4 Skyhawk le dio con una bomba al HMS Ardent - The Courage of one of our falcons, Captain Alberto Philippi of the Argentine Navy with his A4 Skyhawk hit HMS Ardent with a bomb
@erictull2089
6 жыл бұрын
Philippi and Martinez (his wing man) met the Muerta Negra (Sea Harriers) on the way back. Phillipi ejected Martinez disappeared in a fire ball. 21st May, the day the Ardent was hit the Argentinian Air Forces lost three Pucaras, six Daggers (one shot down by Argonaut) and five Skyhawks in seven hours. On the 21st the crew abandoned Ardent, a couple of other ships were damaged but still operational with the exception of Argonaut which suffered major damage to her boiler room, she couldn't move or steer. The Army and Marines landed on the Falklands, no landing ships were hit. Operation complete success. Argonaut returned home 26th June.
@joserafaelzepeda-garza9971
Жыл бұрын
Argentina’s loss of 16 planes in 7 hours of combat
@veronicaphilippi1994
5 ай бұрын
It's Marqiez, not Martinez. And what about HMS Sir Galahad? It was full of troops and armor ready to land. It was sunk.
@erictull2089
5 ай бұрын
@@veronicaphilippi1994 Well (1) it wasn't sunk. It was abandoned. (2) This was at Bluff Cove not at San Carlos where the vast majority of British Troops and Armour had already been landed and the 2nd Para had already taken Goose Green against overwhelming odds.
@lady.stardust-tn3um
5 ай бұрын
@@erictull2089 & why was it abandoned then, Dannyboy? bc it was hit and sunk, there you have it.
@franfonse
14 жыл бұрын
Muy buen documental... volveremos a las malvinas!! VIVA LA PATRIA!!
@jimmyhillschin9987
3 жыл бұрын
este es un documental británico
@JuanPirincho
12 жыл бұрын
Más allá de mi comentario, Philippi me parece un grande lo bajaron y quedo vivo. Viendo este video de nuevo fíjate el doblaje, el acento nuestro que le ponen. Que Gracioso. Si el documental es imparcial lo voy a ver. Gracias por la recomendación. Saludos.
@rubengarcia89
5 жыл бұрын
Is this part of some documentary? Where can i find the original source?
@HistoryonYouTube
14 жыл бұрын
@saltydog45 This is something that rather comes out in this film!
@LuisGax76
12 жыл бұрын
@luisaviation You're absolutely right. I don't know if this bad translation was the result of some sort of bias or, hopefully, a lack of proficiency in Spanish language from the interview-translators.
@lucaandrade6951
3 жыл бұрын
Argentinian pilots of the Best!
@capitanbyrd
10 жыл бұрын
Facts are there, we lost the war (wich i think was a mistake from our side) but we are not naive or stupid, so think before you speak or write, cheers.
@mauriilennon
15 жыл бұрын
A live! Argentinaaaa..
@DodgyIdeot
13 жыл бұрын
@GrandeurFrancaise Thats impossible... the sbs are deployed from sea and the sas are deployed on land. SAS and SBS operations are so secretive, and unique, if they were to be deployed both at once it would almost certainly be together or in support of one another.
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen I simply think that if you took the islands - the situation of the population will become worse and the situation of Argentina will not become so much better. So the islanders will lose and you will probably not gain too much. So the expected value would be negative.
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted Jeffrey William Glover, was treated under the ginebra treaty, his harrier was knock down by the commandos, with their light weapons. And no one threw him to the sea or tortured him.
@kowalski666able
10 жыл бұрын
thats true, but after the invasion the special forces and the regular troops returned to the continent leavin behind the 17 and 18 years old conscripts, and they just dont wanted to be there...the only regular troops on the ground in combat where the 25 infantry regiment of coronel Mohamed Ali Seineldin, the 602 company of comandos of major Aldo Rico and 5 marines battalion of cpt. Robacio all those units surrenderd when they received the order of the higher command.
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@OlenkaWagner diplomatic or war. And is for us a motto to not forget, and to show our loyalty to the cause. Is to say to other argentinian i´m present too in this matter.
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted if you think so let it be, but that wont stop any attack if the militars retake the power.
@Leogalvanhalen
14 жыл бұрын
@alanheath3 ajajaja ese volveremos, significa que serán nuestras en todo sentido y por el medio que sea nesesario, but for the argentinians soldiers that have died and were buried there, they are already in home.
@Leogalvanhalen
14 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted he did not say that he wasnt trying to kill, he say " When i bomb a ship, im not wishing to kill anybody....... " then the translation is ok. but he didnt say; i wasnt trying to kill. He said: i have not the wish. We all dont have the wish, but they did what they had to. As he said we where doing our job.
@Leogalvanhalen
14 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted yes, you too.
@julioomaribarra449
3 жыл бұрын
el primer avion . parece que esquiva un misil o algo por el estilo . pero es verdad hay que sacarse el sombrero con estos pilotos. la diferencia tecnologica era muy muy evidente.
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - you say: "If a war must be then it will be" - the war is not something that happens without human will (hurricane, tsunami, earthquake etc.) - the war is caused by people, Britain is not interested in the war, because they have the islands. The only factor that can cause the war is Argentina...
@HistoryonYouTube
14 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen Volveremos is the first person plural of the future tense of the word to return. One assumes it is to kill as happened on 2 April 1982. I never threaten anyone. As for learning Spanish - why, what is the point?
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - I admit that Argentinian conduct towards the civillians was not the worse compared to other occupations (some British people don't like if I say that). Argentinians did not kill any civillian, Argentinian authorities removed Patricio Dowling who was very brutal, but still imprisonment of Goose Green population and other arbitrary detentions were wrong and the very fact of invasion and occupation was wrong., for the reasons I said above.
@Foxtrop13
12 жыл бұрын
yep but the UN keep insisting that UK must negotiate and not telling argentina to stop the reclaim
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@OlenkaWagner we can guarantee to much more.
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - so what can you guarantee?
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@gaelicscots you just wait.
@Leogalvanhalen
14 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted if you read clearly, you would realised that what i wrote was a reply explaining what the phrase "VOLVEREMOS" means, a phrase that other argentinian said, the way we use that phrase, and we do that to not forget. We dont need to threaten you, its useless, those things are for us, not for you. If a war must be then it will be, it useless your threatens and our. And yes its you the same im not confusing.
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@OlenkaWagner You already have the answers and dont need my opinion, im not going to change my way of thinking. If a war is need it, then it will be, is not depended of me. goodbye Olenka
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted they can be friends, cause the war have ended to them, but if a war is made now, they would send me and the others of my age, so dont ask me to be friendly, with our lands in your hands. And even the enemy have respected one of each other, but that not mean they have to be became friends.
@Leogalvanhalen
14 жыл бұрын
@alanheath3 if you read the first message, the part in spanish its a explain of what "volveremos" means to the argentinian peopel, that we use the prhase to show our loyalty and that we wont forget, but tell me when did i threaten you?
@HistoryonYouTube
14 жыл бұрын
@n52nimbus I may have parts of it which I will post on my channel. But the recording is awful quality.
@HistoryonYouTube
14 жыл бұрын
@n52nimbus I have got clips from it but it is awful quality. I will upload it.
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - you have right to chose the sovereignty of the place you live. No one has right to claim Buenos Aires or Cordoba or Trelew or any place where Argentinian people have been living for generations. But you sais "we can guarantee much more" and when I asked "what" you said "this is not about bribes".
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - I think that even if you had 100% historical rights to the islands (I doubt, but let assume you are right), taking the islands by force was not a good thing to do (even if you did not kill anyone during the action). It is something like having a debt. You owe someone money, but he is not allowed to use illegal threat or force, even if he has right to the money.
@Arminevh
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen In 1982 Argentina did just a token effort to defend their islands, and even so Britain almost lost. Britain have been defeated 3 times in Argentine soil, reason why the only thing they managed to steal those tiny frozen rocks. Next time we go (and we will) they will lose.
@JostVanWair
Жыл бұрын
No, next time you go you'll be absolutely ruined.
@elpollo73
11 жыл бұрын
Ganaron la guerra pero la Royal Navy se llevo una buena paliza.
@jimmyhillschin9987
3 жыл бұрын
y la Armada Argentina se quedó en casa
@raquelalvarez356
3 жыл бұрын
PALIZA !!!!!! JAJAJAJA QUIEN SALIO Y SIGUEN 2021 CON LAS NALGAS COLGANDO DESARMADOS DERROTADOS HUMILLADOS ?? 😤😤😤ARG FALKLANDS
@paolavilela2180
2 жыл бұрын
Seguro que sos chileno lo mismo le va a pasar a ustedes lo mismo. .
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted there were execution in monte longdon, and, what hapen with philippi?
@veronicaphilippi1994
4 жыл бұрын
My father is alive an kicking. He is 80 :)
@TomGodson95
2 жыл бұрын
1:33 That is my nans brother/my great uncle Lenny Yeatman. They got his name wrong 😂
@billbates5475
4 жыл бұрын
The argies dropped 14 bombs that hit british ships but did not detonate, had they done so the brits would have lost the war. This was stated in the memoirs of British Admiral Sandy Woodward.
@JuanPirincho
12 жыл бұрын
Pobre, me da pena el C.P.O. Kent … 3:20 . Esto es porque siempre se da desigualdad en los combates. No es como el “Counter Strike” o en el Fútbol, once contra once. (no es broma).
@cheltcanary
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - wrong! you need not only a reason, but resources too, and your army navy and airforce are weak, crippled by a very poor economy, old equipment (still the same equipment from 1982!) - whilst in that time we have over 1000 troops and hi-tech early warning and defence systems, not to mention typhoon fighters ready to intercept. I served in the falklands on the early warning radar....I have first hand experience!
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted im telling you. 28 years had past and here are people in charge to feed the hate, malvinas is a good card in the power game and if a dictator or a brutal polititian arises, is all it need to retake the war. And for the situation here, too many people wants the military to take the power again.
@barajaz
11 жыл бұрын
si lo intentamos de nuevo .... la flota britanica va a desaparecer de la faz de la tierra
@HalfAnIranianInNY
12 жыл бұрын
@csx999 Why would you say something like that, that only shows up a worrying portrait of your life and principals?
@calebshonk5838
5 жыл бұрын
It's a shame really. Britain used to be the preeminent naval power in the world. And in less than fifty years, they became little more than a footnote on the world scene. Barely even able to defeat Argentina. They couldn't even commission the expedition without requisitioning civilian transports. The modern Royal Navy is not a force prepared for a knock down, drag out fight. While the Argentine military were no pushovers, a single US Navy task force would have wiped the floor with them without even breaking a sweat.
@derekrichardson8312
5 жыл бұрын
Caleb Shonk here we go another yank.U couldn’t beat a bunch of farmers in the Vietnam war.😆😆😆😆😆
@Chazzangenio
11 жыл бұрын
Simple, lamentaríamos mas muertes innecesarias, tendríamos a muchos idiotas de ambos lados regodeándose de esta nueva desgracia, y para variar, nada se solucionaría. Al final, tendríamos entre manos, mas problemas y menos soluciones.
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@OlenkaWagner this is not about bribes, this is about rights, you think about their rights, what about our rights?
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted And?, the same with tom lucero, and?
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - interesting, when did I say that you are evil? I am just saying that it is wrong to demand the territory against the will of the residents. I can understand that historical issues are complicated and not 100% on one side. But if I have to chose the rights of the living people and some legal argument in old papers - I will chose the living people. My question is: can you guarantee them the same living standard as they enjoy now?
@carlosezequiel22
14 жыл бұрын
@ale25auto no creo que el capitán phillipi te conteste maestro seguí participando
@cheltcanary
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen Generally speaking the vast amount of British HATED Hitler and what he was trying to do which was take over Europe. The same way we hated Galteari who tried to take over peaceful islands. The British had a MASSIVE role in defeating Hitler, The Germans never managed to invade Britain depsite taking over most of Europe! Just like we defeated Germany in world war 1.
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - of course no one of us is the God, but we have right to express our opinions on certain actions. So do you think tha Argentinian taking the islands was right or wrong or neutral (1) from diplomatic point of view (2) from moral point of view? Do you think that the conduct towards the residents was (a) good, (b) acceptable (c) not acceptable? What was good and what was wrong about the conduct?
@OlenkaWagner
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - I was just assuming on the information I have and thinking about possible gains and losses, but Eddie seems to confirm my assumptions. Of course Argentina officially does not want the war either, but I always wonder what "volveremos" means. You explained that, but some reasonable doubt still remains. Unless you mean the return as visitors, I wonder how you want to achieve the return...
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@cheltcanary There is the big support of chile, the most of the profecionals troops, were in the frontier with chile. The threatened of chile was crusial for the surrender. Our Air Force managed to destroy the half of your fleet, and we know the british death are too much more than they are telling now, WE KNOW. The british attacked the belgrano out of the war zone. And so on. We are not afraid of you and we will do what we have to, as you would.
@Resenbrink
14 жыл бұрын
Oh goody....war
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@OlenkaWagner You are not british, why you think britain are not interested? they live from war to war, think about it.What i mean with : "if a war....." , is that the choice dont depend of any of the people in here, i`m not the one who would start a war but the one who will fight in it.
@Foxtrop13
12 жыл бұрын
Rosas didnt take all the patagonia but he was probritish and advanced a little in the desert, the one who invade de patagonia was Julio Roca pro british too but he oficial decide to conquer it, GB give them weapons and the land conquist were used to produce food and materials that were solded to GB primarly, the spanish genocide was big but was ONE genocide, great britain commited genocide in africa and india, I think mao tze tung made the biggest genocide at once
@cheltcanary
13 жыл бұрын
@Leogalvanhalen - ONLY argentina claims soverignty, the UN and most of the western world accpet that the Islands are British! Theres nothing you can do about it.
@HistoryonYouTube
14 жыл бұрын
@R0ozter Pueden volver como turistas ahora sin problema.
@josealbertohudson9547
4 жыл бұрын
Asi visitamos todos los buques hundidos..Sheffield Sir Galahad.Coventry.HMS Antilpe..
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted yeah, yeah you always have a reason, dont you? i dont believe anything you could say, and im from bahia blanca, leave like that i don believe you and never will.
@cheltcanary
13 жыл бұрын
@javzowie - the Falklands will always be protected by the British. Its what the Islanders want.......and its what they shall have.
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted they were attacking kids or dont you see. Time for you to face the true or not, is the same to me but the pleasure still is mine.
@robinbanks4265
5 жыл бұрын
Reggy perrin
@juandemalvinas
2 жыл бұрын
Viva la patria carajooo! Malvinas Argentinas!
@pinz2022
13 жыл бұрын
@Calenfeyn41 Whereas, the defensive radar systems didn't work too well in the cluttered confines of San Carlos Bay where most of the killing took place.
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@OlenkaWagner i never said that you said it, i said: you talk as if we were the bad guys, such a difference. Its fine if you think like that but im not going to do that, cause we have the territorials rights.
@mmarsh1972
13 жыл бұрын
@luisaviation Sry thats simply not believable. War is about killing people. The Argentinan pilots did their duty, so did the British on HMS Ardent.
@ale25auto
14 жыл бұрын
capitan phillipi cuantas misiones de combate tuvo en la guerra? te recuerdo que fue una sola explicame como hizo el ardent para buscar aguas abiertas si su sistema de propulsion habia quedado fuera de servicio por una mk17.usted no ataco ese barco y si fuera cierto solamente sus bombas eran eficaces las de la faa no.enseñeme un video donde salgan ustedes por que hace 28 años que los busco y no los encuentro.
@albertophilippi9510
6 жыл бұрын
Valiente, anotá: San Andrés 411 Bahía Blanca. Te espero
@ngamo52Nick
12 жыл бұрын
If Argentina decided to re-take the Falklands again I seriously doubt if Britain would have the ability to respond in the way it was able to back in 1982. The British armed forces are a shadow of what they were in 1982 and more importantly the US will probably support Argentina's cause for purely economic reasons such as oil.
@jburgo15
12 жыл бұрын
sorry, read UK resolution 2065 again, that resol say both parties HAVE to negotiate.
@dervirru
12 жыл бұрын
MALVINAS ARGENTINAS!!!!
@traceurhero
14 жыл бұрын
It was hms intrepid
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@cheltcanary yes that is true chile never support us, but there are almost a thousands countries here, what about venezuela, brazil and too many others. And who care, you think Argentina needs allies, we didnt need them last time, the only thing argentina needs is a reason to invade.
@Leogalvanhalen
13 жыл бұрын
@Eddieposted jajjaja think again, with the mercosur we have too many allies, not like the last time. Its the right of any argentinian to follow the orders. And britain always would be an island, we dont have fear of an island.
@ianharvey8025
4 жыл бұрын
I was there but I feel no hatred towards the argentine people. If anything I feel sorry for them.
@julioomaribarra449
3 жыл бұрын
y por tu armada .
@lady.stardust-tn3um
5 ай бұрын
We feel for you lot Ian, what a coincidence go figure!
@Foxtrop13
12 жыл бұрын
And of that 16 cases in how many the UK is involved? also that same article says that must respect the terrotorial integrity of other nations, and thats the conflict, as UK has that only argument dont want to discuss it in the UN otherwise the problem were already solved, also this article was important to avoid UK to sabotage the creation of Israel and keep the power
Пікірлер: 260