Loved the “general rule of thumb” 😂 I can complement here with an experience to the young men specifically: I had a very few sessions with a psychologist / mental expert / etc, in the “Jung lineage” I remember he told me that, and this was a positive marker to me knowing Jung’s position (in opposition to Freud fyi) and i was forcefully pushed to these sessions; I think it was after the 2nd or 3rd session I told him bluntly I will not come back anymore, to which he replied with a surprising exasperation: “But we don’t stop like this with your psy!” I had a good laugh (privately, he was not an asshole just lost in his theories imho) and I never regretted it… An important thing indeed is I did not like instinctively what was going on… I can’t explain it but guts do exist and we need to trust them actually. Mind you this was in the early 2000s, without much resources like today to help in face of feminism and all the BS… So trust your guts young men, they somehow already know… by God’s design if you ask me. Thanks for this content, helpful as always.
@graybeardactual3149
Ай бұрын
Well put 💪🏼💪🏼
@MoulayAbdsamadBelghiti
Ай бұрын
@@graybeardactual3149 thanks!
@jasonswan3320
Ай бұрын
Some of this is true. Just remember, this is the new world, not the old one.
@stefm.w.3640
Ай бұрын
Kind of disagree because; 1) In my experience, the kind of men who like to boast about their honor are usually the ones who are overcompensating. They'll be living on social security, spend all of their money on expensive clothes and complain about "wahwaaah society is keeping us down". Their definition of honor is pretty arbitrary. And yes, they do have a fragile ego because they do base their self-worth on the approval of others, 2) It has been shown in numerous studies that men who identify themselves as more traditionally masculine have higher rates of anxiety and other mental illnesses. Which contradicts the emotional control part, because control doesn't mean suppressing emotions, control refers to actually being in control, being *in charge* of your emotions instead of letting them control and eat away at you. So I think there's a reason why there's a strong correlation with honor cultures usually being the ones still stuck in the middle ages
@graybeardactual3149
Ай бұрын
Appreciate the reaponse. You're giving us a clear example of how the definitions have been warped & twisted. "Studies" that are based on the "superiority" of the feminine response for example - they actually say men are fragile & reckless because most men don't like eating vegetables. That's what passes for science today & it fuels the delusional, emotional based sense of reality that ppl like yourself have bought into.
@stefm.w.3640
Ай бұрын
@@graybeardactual3149 What studies are based in the superiority of the feminine response? Something that can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence you know... All you did was trying to paint a picture so you could go on and say "therefore science bad" instead of coming up with an argument on your own, that because *some* studies are BS that science must be BS in general. Utter lack of nuance. There's millions of research papers published every year, I'm not saying all of them are correct but one can't say that all of them are equally wrong either. Honestly, just seems like you have already made up your mind and aren't open to discussion and possibly evaluating your own world view. Ironic that you accuse science of having an agenda and being moralistic, whereas you're the most moralistic of them all: like putting the word studies in quotes and calling values you don't agree with "delusional" all in the span of a short youtube comment. Ask yourself this: what would it take to change your mind?
Пікірлер: 10